Treatment of prescription opioid dependence: main results and longterm follow-up outcomes from the Prescription opioid addiction treatment study (POATS) Roger D. Weiss, M.D. Professor of Psychiatry,Harvard Medical School Chief, Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA March 11, 2016
Background Prescription opioid (PO) epidemic
2nd most commonly abused drug More overdose deaths than heroin & cocaine combined Most studies of opioid dependence had focused on heroin users in MMT Can’t assume same findings with PO users
Background • Buprenorphine was the most likely treatment option to consider for Rx opioid users • Proven efficacy for treatment of opioid dependence • More flexible and convenient than methadone due to office-based prescription • Some questions remain about optimal delivery (e.g. role of counseling)
Main POATS design Wei
Overview of POATS
Largest randomized clinical trial yet conducted for prescription opioid dependence
Conducted at 10 sites across the U.S.
N=653 2-phase adaptive treatment research design
Research questions
Does adding individual drug counseling to buprenorphine-naloxone tx + standard medical management improve outcome? What length of bup-nx tx is best for prescription opioid dependence? 1 month vs. 3 months? Maintenance? Does current chronic pain or a history of heroin use affect outcome?
Phase 1, up to 12 weeks
Bup detox with or without drug counseling
Phase 2, 24 weeks
Bup maintenance with or without drug counseling
Main study results Wei
Successful outcome 60
SMM only
50
SMM + Drug counseling
40 % 30 20 10 0 Phase 1: Taper
Phase 2: Maintain
Week 16: End of taper
Week 24: Follow-up
Phase 1 vs. Phase 2, maintain: p<.001; Phase 1 vs. Phase 2, follow-up: p=.21; Phase 2, Maintain vs. Follow-up: p<.001
The role of heroin use & chronic pain
Did lifetime heroin use at baseline (23%) predict successful outcome? % of pts with successful outcomes
60 50
Heroin use
40
None
30 20 10 0
*p<.003
End of bup tx Week 12*
8 weeks post-taper Week 24
Phase 2
Did chronic pain at baseline (42%) predict successful outcome? % of pts with successful outcomes
60 50
Chronic pain
40
No chronic pain
30 20 10 0 End of bup tx Week 12
8 weeks post-taper Week 24
Phase 2
Primary reason for use in chronic pain patients, past & present 1° reason for 1st use Pain Get high 1° reason for current use IF 1st reason was pain Avoid withdrawal Pain Get high Weiss et al. J Subst AbuseTreatment 2014
83% 13%
56% 23% 14%
Long-term follow-up (LTFU) study: Rationale & design
LTFU study rationale
No previous longitudinal studies of treatment-seeking PO dependent patients
Nothing is known about the long-term course & response to treatment of this population
LTFU study design
Aim: to examine long-term outcomes of participants in the main trial Naturalistic, exploratory study Participants were interviewed at 18, 30, & 42 months post-initial randomization Telephone interviews: 45-60 minutes each $75 for each interview completed All interviews conducted by McLean Hospital staff
LTFU Sample Description N=375 enrolled N =338 interviewed
Sample description (N=375) Demographics
44% female Mean age = 33 90% white 48% never married 64% employed full-time Psychiatric history, past-year
Major depressive disorder: PTSD: 12%
21%
Sample description continued Substance use history at baseline
16% past-year non-opioid SUD 22% ever used heroin 32% previous opioid use disorder treatment 63% 1st used opioids to relieve pain 48% used opioids ≥4 years
Illicit opioid use, dependence and abstinence
Mean days using drugs, past 30 days, over time 30
Baseline Month 18 Month 30 Month 42
25 20 15 10 5
0
p<.001
Rx opioids*
Marijuana*
Opioid dependence over time, pastmonth (excluding agonist therapy) 50
100% at baseline 40
30
% 20
16 12
10
8
0
Month 18
Month 30
Month 42
p<.02
Illicit opioid abstinence past-month by current opioid agonist treatment 100
%
80
Agonist tx 80
Not
60
40
80
51
37
20
0
*p<.001
Month 18*
Month 42*
Treatment utilization over time
Opioid agonist treatment over time, past-month 50
40
38
37
Month 30
Month 42
32 30
% 20
10
0
Month 18
SUD treatment, past year Treatment, % (n) None Buprenorphine maintenance Self-help groups Outpatient counseling Medical detoxification Methadone maintenance Inpatient/residential Intensive outpt/day hospital Naltrexone
Months 18, 30, & 42 34-39% 41-43% 35-41% 23-32% 6-12% 6-9% 3-7% 2-3% 0-1%
Initiation of risk behaviors
Prevalence of new heroin users >4 days, past month
Follow-up
New heroin users
Month 18 (n=252)
11 (4%)
Month 30 (n=312)
16 (5%)
Month 42 (n=306)
0
Prevalence of injection heroin use >5 times, past year
Follow-up
1st injection use
Month 18 (n=252)
12 (5%)
Month 30 (n=312)
18 (6%)
Month 42 (n=306)
4 (1%)
Deaths
2 participants died during main trial: 1 during Phase 1, 1 during Phase 2
5 participants (1.5%) died during LTFU period
Predictors of Long-term Outcomes • Those successful in treatment in the main trial were more likely to be abstinent at 18month follow-up, but this was no longer the case by Month 42 • Those with lifetime heroin use before entering the study were more likely to be opioid dependent at follow-up
Conclusions Wei
Conclusions Encouraging results
Rates of opioid abstinence in LTFU surpassed main trial extended bup-nx treatment outcomes Especially if receiving agonist treatment (80%) Even if not on agonist treatment, rates at month 42 matched outcomes on bup-nx at 12 weeks (50% successful) Decreased opioid use was not accompanied by increased use of other substances.
Conclusions Cautionary results New heroin & injection use 8% of participants reported 1st use of heroin during LTFU 10% reported injecting heroin for the 1st time, >5x in past year 1.5% died during LTFU History of any heroin use prior to study entry associated with poor outcomes
Limitations
Generalizability: 52% response rate
LTFU participants may be more or less severe
Interviews
During tx trial, in person + urine drug screens In LTFU, by telephone without urine drug screens
Main trial success less strict measure than complete abstinence required for successful LTFU outcome
Conclusions
1st longitudinal study examining treatmentseeking patients with prescription opioid dependence Opioid agonist treatment effective in supporting long-term recovery, though some recover without agonist treatment Initiation of heroin use &/or injection can occur Should be monitored over the course of agonist treatment
Acknowledgements
McLean POATS LTFU team,
with
3 World Series trophies
Our home base: Proctor House, McLean Hospital
Acknowledgements, cont’d
• • • •
Investigators, clinicians, & patients at the 10 study sites Jennifer Potter, Ph.D., M.P.H. and Walter Ling, M.D. CCTN, CCC, and DSC-1 staff NIDA Grants U10DA15831 & K24DA022288