Effects of Self Managing Life Crisis Based on the Oriental towards

Life Crisis and Well-being qf Married Women

E d : ungs-.ac.th

akharinwirot Uaivmity

114SuIrbumvit23Rd.,Bangkjak 1OlIQ Thadad E-mail: -.th ,&*act

The main objtctivcs were:

1) to study tbt efficiency of Mam& Lifd Crisis WCP) b a d an the t o w d dm df-peroeption of life #isls, 2) ba bwtigak m i a ~ c t i o n ~ c pychwmial en Z h m r M c 8 (of mmticjsq d f control armd d mpport) and W,md 3) to study the variables p r c d i a tho wcil-hhg Srlbject$ wlm d b i on dpeacFptiao of d s , urtro motbus of sixth ~ ~ U ~ ~ i a ~ p a m p l i n g , 3 2 p a r t i g~m p w a en dr# ~tt b~ ~ ~ ~ J 1grwrp. Dab was by M O V A d s t i c 8 and multiple rcgrdo12 Ths W m M dthat ~ ~ t h e ~ ~ p u p w b o ~ w i t h ~ , d l o w e r ~ a t b a t o t a l p e r c e p t i o n d ~ e mtionosidoophg,d~ting.Thesemw~~~ d lmy n i ~ c m t a t 0 . 0 5 ~ l h m ~ wnmlgroup.Nomtcmtionm o B s # v d d a m o n g ~ a l ~ c h.ainingprogramtowards s d tha ~ - ~ t i m d l f i c r i S i s . F ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ o f p t i d p d s at 42.1% Kqwordst Mmi$hg lift eri&, Midm c& Wd-bch& Matriad women

arid

Tbcfopndetionof~~isbasadootbt~afIPtw~mlati~Asf$mityisc~~ l h e m midunit ofhumrtll~.A~torhFNatiwal~cdSocidI3evtlopmcslt board &odd focus cm buildhg h p p h s ofthe paople. HUM m organhations art lxyingto pmmitc Plan, P> the cwrcept of ME-wffieieacyand ta lxphold the philwphy of !%Gciency Gcoaomy of H.M. Kin# W l m l ~ u l y a ~ ~ K i o g d ~ ~ ~ 2 0 0 6 ) , ~ a l l ~ y m e m ~ & t h e f w m ~ o l r o f d w e l ~lt b, e y w o ~ M @ a ~ t a t d t u d e ~ ~ g a h t a l t h y ~ , d h e r w x e the m&n&It social a d d c

bi able to lad their t h i k , ssciety and trrmtudly ttae country t gro*

T b statistic of self-iqjury clr sufdde from the -t of Mental H d h in 2005 ~~the SUWG mk w a s ~ ~ 16-20 l caddayml y d l HhTbtmost~~uicideratcwas24.9%fixpef~0~l~ ~3639~TBeftmahWarmhidomtsthatwrashtim#rbi@mtbaamal~TBo~ pdkping micide w g s mostly&q u m l wirb dose ptrson (36%); v a t being c u d a n d w king bland (33%); abut love @I%),and h u t ~ # m w(U%). The f a d as ~ b precipitating c factor for d suicide w m duwic discma (573%);11(22.4%); ptiychwk (10.9%)md incmsing d r e ~ . The statistic f h m the D-tnt of Mental Rcaltb a h a w e d that tha patioats visi!hg s m s rebatiom clinic, had i n d h m 5JW in 2004 to 5,746 Min 2005. ~e~vidualwho~sto~ihemidtifeFai&my~~~tal.~~or~narlmtsfs ~itis~td~iftbepblemis~biddFn,itmsy~mm~andWto~bsli&untilthat falstiydocide toendup b i d b e d M e o e # l m e ~ ,ormd t o a b u s e , m a n j g m n p c h i l a and family, till it finally the w m h g potanWty.

-

Women play metal role la t h t ? W d a ~ y They . mhuetaboprincipally ~ ' b l e f b a dr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a , w w x l e n w o d k m g ~ i d e ~ h s ~m be ~h' bai l vi t k e abs r n e s l h ~ e i r w o r k ~ M ~ I f h o ~ ~ $ t h t b o d y ~ a n d d s c ~ ~ b o l r n o w ~ ~ i a o e m a l d & ~ ~ ~ $ o u p h ~ o r t & t o ~ ~ ~ d i s m M u a ~ e ~ ~ i f ~ p p o m e m ~ ~ e W ~ u r i s k ~ ~ ~ t b w r ~ ~ l p r o ~ f a d i l i f e ~ ~ & o f ~ n ~ m l @ ~ 8 ) & ~ w e d ~ a t ~ ~ ~ t c d t o amploy4 Thai mmi& wego amticism d experiawx ia lit% -1 mpndbility ia Mly, maria ruMhhip, M y qqmt, mmitmmt to &tddlimwithin ~ ~ ~ ojob promotioa, a d job , ambiguity, ~ d b o g s ~ ~ e ~ w ~ I l m l ~ b o r r e f i * . n ~ h t ~ d ~ - f b l t f

~cim~an~faetw~tbadm~mlifbcri&dtbat~Mtlrrithotfttr~b& ~ ~ i n b ~ t o ~ w ~ m a i s i s . The mmmhaswera &fore &mtd in baining the m e n in arder to build up d f p m t 4 0 1 1to cope with

t b 8 p m b h ~ l i f o ~ ~ ~ t o ~ ~ o f B ~ m d a a s ~ t i m q g ~ $ l ~ o f ~ E a t id cbmd y e x m b ofTlsoigm, Tberawcbm thedm applied thejointpraciia8 of on Buddim and Twism d W a d tho hmccbn af nwrotidf-1 d d ~ ~ n o f l i f e e r i p i S . h ~ h m i d l ~ ~ ~ b a & e t o ~ y t h i g M tothtirdailylift, t o ~ ~ o f l i ~ ~ r a n d ~ n # i r ~ w n ~ ~ E ~ a n d b a c c a r w g o o d q w l ass& of Thai socisry. 2 . O b ~ o f f h e ~ T o s t u d y t h c ~ a f ~ ] ; i f e ~ h g r a m m e ~ ) , t o ~ a n ~ c t i o

~ m a n d ~ W a ~ t h t d - ~ o f f i h ~ ~ T h a i d a d w w n a a d ~ t h e ~ p r U i i ~ t l a Q w l e U - ~ a m o m p ' l b a i ~ ~ 3 . G c o p s d ~ ~

T I s e r e s F a r c h ~ a n ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ & u m ~ ~ w n l ~ ( I 9 W & w W ~ ~ t h a t e b a n g e i n ~ ~ v i m w a s d ~ ~ @ d m. dsacial % M c e I M g u i ~ ~ ~ a r n d * ~ b i n t a r a c t i o n o f h ~ t a a d ~ t raniabla&shamrinthtml,

4.~pchMttwoleg3f ~dwas~oathsfrrctwial~dcsignd~ionwmusad~tbemaio,~~fa W B i r

4.I T I s e ~ I t ~ ~ o f ~ ' I b e i ~ w o m ~ n ~ 3 5 5 5 ~ ~ ~ b s

i

x

t

h

~

h

h

L

i

n

~

M

~

.

~

~

~

~

m

d

- ~ 3 3 4 s t u d a n t s - ~ ~ t s . m - w b o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W h O d ~ h m m k ~ ~ o f l i f r : ~ ~ ~ a v r n ~ ~ ( # 1 6 0 )

~ ,, ~ ~ M

~ t a l o f l ~ ~ w h m t e e r o d ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ o f ' ~ 7 ; 2 p ~ s o 1

~ e g f t l l l ~ m t h e ~ w i t b ~ ~ ~ ~ d g r r m p , w b h ~ e a t a l ~ & M ~ a s t b e e a n t r o r ~ ~ . ~ & ~ ~ ~ v e a ~ ~ ~ d ~ a ~ l i f e ~ ~ t o f ~ m ~ w h S c h ~ Z l Q a a memck6. 4.2 7%e&F

4.2.1 T b c ~ w ~ o p s d b a s e d a m t h t o r i ~ ~ o f T ~ D o c t r i n % T b a ~ p a o

w~~to~prof~fok~~orrdoorrsctioainordeeto~daEPssui~bili~tottw~ t h e m m r & m d ~ ~ ~ a n y ~ I n ~ ~ 4.2.2 Mcipaab w m t h e d to the sppved MU2 p r o m W m R d o m k i Control Gmup ~ ~ D d g n ~ i s s b O w a m T a b1.l e s 4 ~ ~ h e ~ c i ~ o f ~ ~ ~ m ~ a c t i v i t i ~ m a ~ d a i l y ~ r r s ~ mmchbbtwem h 4 m b A p 3 m. M e acMa mi. T h t ~ e r c a i v h y m m d t r y s e i f ~ ~ & W f b r W t c c b t t i g u a o f m ~ a n d b o d y m ~ t -&--ubItoctrine,-on,nirw-dTd&,m&with C h i n e s e m u ~ a a d ~ r e l i t f t b r o u gMbd~s t w i t b d n w x ~ c .

ii. ThaddviQwap~aotivityandsdf~toMmh-dmlatimtoocrpc w i t h ~ a m i m a l w ~ g e sbebody in andmeotalnmmguumt iii The third was &massage Irairiingfor rthttion wcmdbg to Thai traditionalphiple and

thcrr~tofbedyandm~mafia~~~to~Forthsoan~grwpwas ~ t o ~ ~ t i ~ b y ~ ~ f ~ e ~ & ~ ~ ~ c o p * ~ m i d I i f b l l l a j m a R i Q d ~ n e a ~ ~ ~ b y ~ ~ m k dawYby*@4 ~ . 4 ~ ~ ~ l l e c t e d ~ t h b ~ g r o u p i n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t i m e ~ t o d ~ p r d g a J l w h b 1 m ; t b e ~ t i r n e w a s t o c o U e d ~ e s t d a t aafBertRlJIliag ~y tomsum

~ ~ 1 o f l i f e ~ ~ 1 e d t h b t h i r d ~ ~ t o ~ a ~ ~ m o n t h s o f t b e mtasuia the mhbk 4.2.5 The perfoo f t b e ~ l ~ g r o u p w s ~ byr r p of theprtidputs a home, and ehbytakiP~~mXfrtmtbemtooollactgaalirstive~~bout~~aad&of~as

~~

~~

Q t t 3 t o s r y r p o r t r b s ~ ~

-

4.3 W c h krsmntm

9

Trialwesfthe' w a s G O D d d wits ~ m o ~ d t whohwerestudying e ~ in ~ sch~lsmBangF~Afofsiof2wpoola-~~COCffiCientlmalysisofthc 4ut&mmbs&dephMhW1e2 4,4 Am&i!s T h s d a t a ~ ~ t b e ~ ~ ~ u s i n g S P S S ~ p r o g n u a . ~ ~ d t l

k ~ w d ~ m ~ & h f l ~ ~ d ~ M a t i o p . F - T e s t ~ W ~

d

n

d

t

i

p

b

~

a

n

a

l

~

s

~

~

b

3

m

h

~

*

5Rmb aSbcd~hbeaaWMandhm~of~fincfinase~wteoaGhdad~totbe staicd hw folloarp.-SJ&~itMtharmifiThaidadwoman~bhadbMFIsingthcMLX=PWm

~ g r o u p , h d o v d l ~ o f ~ ~ o f l i f c d s b l o w a ~ ~ T b a i w o m e n i n ~ l g m uW p . ,t k h y p d m b I w m q q w n k d d i s dmm in table3. After ~ o f ~ o f ~ v a r i a b l e ~ k c h i s i r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a f t k o ~ t a l a a d c o a t r o I ~ w e r a a o t M ~ ~ ~ ~ a o p i a g s n d ~ o ~ r and control gmq showed smiaidy pignihnt di&rmw rtt 0.05 lev& zm &own in fablt 4. ~.ZFwIlts~al~~bahrkqg,itM~-mi&~mrrsriad~~had~ dtfrMLCPMonmootidaypwacbM~~d~ondlifterisha~thanbefbre ~ g . ~ , ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ s b a w n i a ~ 5 . ~ ~ ~ b v a r i ~ o f c a c b , v &orid-m

. I

@

~

m

o

,

,

~

i

t

~

~

~

r

s

r

r

.

m

,

a

m

r

~aotdiff~b~~~of~orimfcd~d~mwa~elowathrmbefore~hgr &&tical dgdimwat0.05 aidmmin table 6. 5.3 ~ - l & s ~ ~ / w ( ~ e ~ ~ , o f ~ m i d l i l c ~ h a i ~ c d w o m c n w h o ~ b k t m k l wiib MLCP based on orieataf appa& and receiwd d nuppt hd ~ ~ c a l significant l y d j ~ ~ ~ a t . 0 5 ~ ~ o n ~ o l l o f ~ c r i 9 i s a h R l ~ t o h 1 *,?he ; o a t r o l ~ -hair wmd. 5 . 4 ~ w k ~ ~ l a f ~ ~ t 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ b r d b e ~ n t r a i n c a i ~ ~ d ~ $ a d ~ ~ ~ d n t a r o t i ~ ~ l ~ h e d d i f f ; e F e a t o v e r s l l ~ ~ C S u y ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ fM . ~ ~ w s ~ ,

b 5 m e m ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ m g l a r r i e d w o m t s n ~ v a r y i P g I ~ d & ~ l ~

~ h a d b ~ ~ ~ w a g m d i f f ~ T h k d i d n o r ~ ~ a P i s . ~ d t b t h d d a f 3 ~ t S 6 n d l i & r & &it ~ ~ t h e ~ h a v i n g d i ~ s t E lcvtl, f ~ thb t m 1 m

o

f

~

d

m

~

i

p

~

o

r

~

~

~

~

a

o

d

~

a

d

mmm&

5.6~Parmif1W~ruiwo~tatwho~law~mnaum~~~~msoeid~up by MLX=Pbascdw~ a p p m a c h { ~ ~ - 4 2 . 1S 1D ,= 1 1 2 4 , p m b h ~ g ~ m n =

-@bed

www.ccsenatorglijps

International Jo~mdafPsycbological Studies

-

VoL2,No. &

~

2

0

1

0

13.00, SD = 3.00 and d q m i o n man 19-11, SD = 337) had Iower m s in o v d life crisis for each variable, i.t. stxss, motion oriented coping and adaptati~n,lower than the women who mmd Mgh on ne1uo~cisrn, and lower on s d support and dm h n the group not mined (3- m w 25.92, SD = 7.34; emlion orientad m a n = 18.92, SD = 5.66 and dpmion man = 27.67,SD = 7.27). 7 % difhrn@ts ~ w m nut statistically s i m t n t . Tltw r b e j h r d i did ~ nor s e r p p n ' h ~ t h i s .

-

-

5.7 The mMfe ?la3 & m women who mrtd high on self control ad s d d support, after k n train& by MLCP b a d on oririental approach (stress ruean 3225, SD = 14.64; pwblcm cupmg mean = 14.00, SD = 2.98 and &pWi~n rnm = 21,@3, 9D 4.00) of tifie &is 4tach of its l m w ov&? variablw, i.s. streis, mation oriented coping md adaptath ras mmprared w the wwnen who had lowed self = 34.N, SE = 9.26; pmMem copkg m a d cantrol, lower mid a p p r t a d had not beexl mined (Skess 18.67, SIT 3.44 and adaptation mean = 28.00, SD = 4.933. W dilBmwsw m not stati&dly si@&ant. llw, thesefindings dinr not q p m r ~ i h s r h . 5+8SlnmE&on o r i d c q k g a n d a d a p k h muld predict well-Wmg of midlife TtLai manid WQUCI XI at a modcratE Ievd or 41.1% and eaapration had grtatesl inflwnct over well-bing in oppssjte dj+m @ = 0.741). Stcond was emation oriented W g @= 0.185) ad hst was stress @= OL021].h e f i d i n g s mp~t-ld the hWhd. 6. D$sctlssIQnof Resab The posttmt lxabtd Thai mamid w o r n hd lower p q t i o n of lifk chis as c o m p d to the m t p u p and

-

-

-

~~h~W~bEtPW.Th~gt~rmppDTfedthethearetidviewp~intd~dF (1984) wfio pointed out that when srw is c x p m h d by aa h W m I h y rurn to social supor! in varying d e g e s . TE hihidual Urea tries to solve my pm&& problem by applying pddm fd qhg. Rowever, if it were a wims problem, empdon oP-iented wphg was appM and this would yidd Mkx if they had social Wpprt. ~cseWmg~acmmt.mto~~ofH&da@~)whastuW~eprobhfd~af510 Israeli persans, This study found W mution oriented cupin8 using cognitive qqmisal was a ltss e f f d v m r n e c ~ t o ~ t s t r E S S ~ ~ ~ b r e l ~ a , M o h d e d @ h r e s ~ h addition, the tm&g program b m d on Taoism was i m p h t b d by gmnp a&viti.es dboxing, physical h h g , madiWm, d l y hfid activity rmd meait pmp dkwssion. All of tbm &ods yielded positiva imp& upon @ce of d n h g the rrrind ttnd w d d lead tw&s the &ility of problem f d m p @ d a & p t a t i o n t o Ijf&uisi&S u c a m m u a n d ~ m ( 2 0 0 5 ) d a m r y f a u r h o u r s p g m m basdd an Taoism ta show h t it I d efficidy p m t d the evclI-hiig ofthe pwicipanb better t b m prttcst lev& hi+ rhan &lmtt.aincd cwtro1 group. Additionally, b m were s e v d o t k r rmmdm tbat supported the Buddhism practice in i@rmdtant impact ta caImand miax rhe mind, promote jntdlectual abilities and to f d Mter goIutioa to the life d i s as a h also to in in the of TmgchItbip (1987). This -%I studid the i m p l of WCrttioa training w SeYcnteea tqm seean* students fix e a t weah. mhs showed that thE oxpuimcnta1 gmup had bttm dhealth in the p m t &an ~ in pr&&. Similarly m the st&y ofh g p m w a t (2004) who abut mdbion to & m h k strws, participui graduate students were trained t~ pmoiice the four n&lc truth$ and musck m d a Tbe study &wed that thc Mad p u p badwmmm~t&hunGudgrollp,

m

F k h r cYidum can be f o d iD. he mwd~ of A p w i t (19%) who qwtEd that t kt ~ h k j u of e sdf mmage wm a kind of Whhg that I d similar h p a c f as mditatlon. E .mss~g~ was rl~yhnic b t helped to mbditatF and calm down miad to stress md base was an taexercisa for both mind ~ n bdd y . F m the hypptbesk Thai &ed women m the mprhmlal p u p who had difftreat k w h of social support, had different d q m of pwptim of life crisk Rmdb of this study showed that smial support had h n p z t ~ I -tion of Ufc crisis. T h ~ findings t support dm kypoksis a d gain cvifram other mem&es. Tn a study Maslach (1986; cited $ Mawat, 1998) shkd that dsupport M played m irqmrtmt mle in d i n g sYms md cdmmion of wmk -1in the sbdy of N o h (1citd in I.inAa, 2004) 3t was found tbrrtswiaI supportwtlldhdpapmmto qwMawiih sbzss. EmmaNaAyytthyaand Sortmarin (1997l found tbat frPmily s u p m could alleviate f&hgs of sb% in M v i h k In additim, Phulsamt (2001) found tZle -tS who ttPld WeiYad levels of & suppm wMlJd have statistidly $&dficantd i f f e ~ ~ n t -tion, mi that bigher MISofswhI l f ~ ~ p p r t help d d a p m n to adapt better with tbe dtuation These rtmxlls &awed t h t &dm b d a impact an rhe m a n of Iife crisis. study of S u M h q w ~t &11~h ~~SOI e ~ w t ~ pblwtl mmt d ~ n due s ro tlaeir

(awl)

Inttmatlonallwl ofPQ@mlq$d Wi#

%I. 2, No. Zr b w n h 2010

7 p m d i t y cbruaduisticg. For instam a serious aad sadthe pma MI&- to fbel mwe stress. This hdhg sllso camp& with the study of htdadm&CBwchm and summa^ (2007) which that a i e d i v c m l i t y had h&um in w t i m of the m r n of life &is mong midlife Thai M o d womm ap to 0.13 and had amelation with other miable9 rach as lhfamily incoant, famiry suppt, religious b m i t u m t From the study ofcbichmde~(1998) it was fd that mtal sbbility was negarivcly d t 6 d io

strtss. Sm,thaWof-(2W)Wfou~dghthebmrwrscs,asCrorrgw w m l d ~ ~ ~ l ~ l e \ r e l s a f s t r e s s h a oswakwpmwdty, dtiw

yt-

T h i g i n ~ , t s d W g e l f ~ ~ d i d r t o t ~ ~ d l i f t ~ a p ~ c t a d ~ s o m

wggested~d~lwouldm~l~a~bhthe~wbohadbocPbaiwdtondaptmaealwjPh conflict bdmior or exady suitable bahaviw. For h s h m , this grmp wndd nhh fjrwn smkbg, using of illegal h g , dyeh d t b cam, w expieace e v e d o n , R d d n g to the study of P h h m g (2W)

w h o G o m p a r e d t h e b e l i e f o f ~ ~ a n d ~ ~ w t b e h & d ~ i n f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i t s h a w e d t b r d t h c ~ o f ckgmdidnotdcca d f ~ ~ dBbmce P h m & a m ( ~ ) ~ o

~ t h s ~ ~ ~ t u r a o r i ~ ~ s a l f c a ~ l d p h ~ d m ~ d e m a n ~fdthat~awmloftha~ataffwas~~~dhr~l~with~exarci~(r 03).

it kmalls far tmingh y p d d s , found that motion o r i d ooping and adqmion muld pdid ~ ~ o f m i d l i f e ~ ~ ~ h a s e f o u n d ~ ~ ~ a t t l d y o f ~ t . { 2 0 0 2 ) * ~ tharwdl~wbwtcsmanEalMLwahdh~~d~to@vb~problem, F

b W t p m a ~ a g e ~ ~ M ~ & ~ d p e r c e p t i o a , M i n g r m r r e ~ b ~ h

germiotdworqfaelbeppypbhg~m~olrtdwlyethtpaobl~~~also~ ~ ~ o f S h e E E j 1 9 9 5 ) w ~ s t m d i e d m i d l i f e C % i n e E t ~ c orrndfolmdtHatihemarritdooupies~ pplt m d I t f ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ b ~ l i f o & h I o p ~ ~ ~ a a d ~ m i d l ~ i i s i s . m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f r o m ~ ~ c i a l ~ ~ ~ ' l y I i f t s p s u t G p 8 ~ r h ~ h t b P i r ~ a t ~ .

by the nailand I b a r c h Fund in jointly prit$ M a of the This rtsaatcb was fmanchDp Higher Edmth CmmWop1. We p a t l y ap@& the valaabe advim ead guihco of A ~ E W Cbamda,FhD., F e Mmbor o f M w S c i w m Res&mhInsfiMe,SrinakhwbwirotUniversity.

XpWi?,S. (1993)

Ax&: RtI-

m t e r of Mags Medih B&n&k

Pub, ~

s

f Pmuv w

m d k u g f n g CiIm. Bangkok:

i

~

m,),

B ~ w A. % (1989). -1 oopitivt t h r y . In R V W Annals of a i l d Dadopent, 6. Six theories of childdedopmar~@p. 1-50]. - C T : M M , Big &ad Tac. (2003). ~ t w p d i n g &is themy, Crkh & Suicide+ [Onlina] AvailabIt: bttpJ ~ 2 2 I ~ ~ o t l ' d ~ ~pebwylf2005) h t m l .

D i e s ED.(2000). Wdm Wtll-

h m k m -@r,

55(1), 3443.

M d a m h g , U.,R qbm C., C h m c b a O., & Swarmma A. (2508). &dR e l a A n a w l and ~ c g a f ~ C r i s i s o f ~ ~ M a r r i e d T b e f W ~ ~ o f P ~ m m 1Q),73-93.

Lb@mumn, P. (2004). Tao D o d m of Lm Jtle. Ihngk& Tek fi"Jit rm lfob F o d a t h h @rarbn Room o f R m d f W Hospid Lfmsfla, S, (XIW). F a d m Wtsd to ?ES&I Cqhg of s of Masmof EduGatfon.@dth Bhath). Bm@k SriPakharinwirot b h d t y .

M

H QWQ Im&dd mw, Wkdahg F a c and ~ M& F&m R e h d r o B d m #h$Wd Nme W w h g in i W B+IP H t & W w .T b d s of Masm of Bhmtiaa Psychob). rndty. wdc:a m I + d Model: of Midlife M i P&IRws 3121, 105s1m 01- PX. (1999).

- .

PIimmw P. (2004): -n dbb Wiqfin In& r m d E ; * i d Pomr and MfConftolof Nmhh h n AIDS i?i&etdand Nia&@ctd in h m m NmahI lasd#~ T&p $ h@stcr of Scimct

m u d - > *

wemw.mok: Shck, D,TL (1493. hQaritsl Quality and F?@h&& JmmaI OfGmettk -om, ISb(lX 4546.

Wd-being of Married Ad& in a Chitaese W Q L L

hkmtiml Jmmlaf psycho^ S m d h

wyrw,~s~rip.

%l. 2, No. 2; December 2010

Table 4. Variam d ea& term of Life Crisis r a m (stress, enmion miented coping and adaptation) comparing w o m e n w h o h a d ~ ~ ~ W i t h ~ a n d ~ w b ~ d n ~ t ~ ~ b d

..

sow&?of Y

~

Sum of SQ~IIW

W

df

MmnSq~tm

Unfvadae

F - tesf

tr*afntq,g

A*

and wnirul group

-

79.34

StmX

T~ble5. Wdpl~analysis of d

m s (MANDvA) of o ~ m l llife

W

P

~

P

Y

~

-

~

P

K

of

h the

Tabb 6. Multiple analysis o f vwkmces (MANOVA) for 41 variable of fie life esisis wrc (stress, emotion orimtbd coping and daptaiiunl of warnen witbin q m i m m d p n p and control group

--

W m iB~$rore-@m twin&

- motion oriented coping

-

adaptation NOR: *F0.05

Published by C a d a n Ce~d&rafsciena and &&ion

Independent VWhbl# 1

.

-l-lrp

1. Relaxationby e x m k with tight music, 2. Emotfonal cmml by meditation. 3. Emotion w h k d coping by Ikslingto mofk i s m d o h . 4. Adaptationby d m activity. 5. Adaptation to l b socisry byjoiningr &d b e f i t sctivity. 6. W-ThiMtlOaal-

-

c@-mP 1. n i a ~ t t r a i n i e w 2 wmmivisedtotrrrioim&~ 3. ~ m g i v a n d u c w n m m r n ~ t o ~ ~ ~ ~

soa*Isnppurtbln~orchildreD. I. Wac gim pitiw mmmuniclttion to

pmmokwill-poweraad~~f$rce. 2. W ~ g i v u l ~ ~ b s b a v i ~ f , 3. W# a m ssskm to mhce buden in

1 .

Dependent Vdables

orrra~ws

W& 1. !hmm

2.

motion oriunted q i n g

3. ~

a

t

l

li ib!~ I