Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas 2013 Connecting the Dots: School Spending and Student Progress

We Made The Grade

District Listings

From Abbott to Zephyr, every school district in Texas receives a Financial Allocation Study for Texas (FAST) rating ranging from one to five stars. See how well your district fares in its relative academic progress and spending.

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

T

he Comptroller’s Financial Allocation Study for Texas (FAST) examines both academic progress and spending at Texas’ school districts and campuses. The following table profiles each Texas school district, with an assigned FAST rating of one to five stars indicating its success in combining cost-effective spending with the achievement of measurable student academic progress. Five stars reflects the strongest relative academic progress combined with the lowest relative spending.

READING KEY RESULTS TABLES

The FAST overview tables provide the following information about select school districts and charter school operators:

FAST

1

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

65

83

79 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ABBOTT ISD

HILL

276

MET STANDARD

70

62

69 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ABERNATHY ISD

HALE

765

MET STANDARD

61

32

48 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ABILENE ISD

TAYLOR

16,992

MET STANDARD

69

49

62 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ACADEMY ISD

BELL

1,174

MET STANDARD

62

57

62 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HARRIS

742

MET STANDARD

86

30

63 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

192

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND TECHNOLOGIES CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

ACADEMY OF DALLAS (C)

DALLAS

617

MET STANDARD

19

2

4 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ACCELERATED INTERMEDIATE ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

253

MET STANDARD

99

98

99 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

134

MET STANDARD

COUNTY — ADRIAN ISD OLDHAM county in which the district’s administrativeNUECES offices AGUA DULCE ISD are located; ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD BEXAR WOOD

368

MET STANDARD 7

841

MET STANDARD

SHACKELFORD

503

ALDINE ISD

HARRIS

65,415

PARKER

4,712

ALEDO ISD ACCOUNTABILITY RATING — ALICE ISD TEA rating of academic performance; ALIEF ISD

MATH PROGRESS PERCENTILE — ALIEF MONTESSORI COMMUNITY SCHOOL (C) percentile ranking of math progress; ALLEN ISD

JIM WELLS

5,472

HARRIS

45,748

ALTO ISD

79

82 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯°®®®

85

46

72 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

90 80INDEX 90  SPENDING — + VERY LOW = ¯¯¯¯¯  MET STANDARD ranking 18 5 7 + adjusted VERY HIGH = regional ¯®®®® of spending per pupil, for wage MET STANDARD 84 96 94  + LOW ¯¯¯¯° differences, relative to the district’s fiscal=peer group; and

297

MET STANDARD

COLLIN

19,768

MET STANDARD

127

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

9

72

71

75 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

FAST96 RATING rating+ combining  96 — 97 star VERY LOW =academic ¯¯¯¯¯ progress and relative spending;

1,090

MET STANDARD 56 data 88 ** Insufficient

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CHEROKEE

669

MET STANDARD

55 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

JOHNSON

3,452

43

64

Rating is an average of the composite academic+progressLOW percentile and the spending index; MET STANDARD 14 65 34 = ¯¯¯®® *The FAST districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores.

ALVARADO ISD ALVIN ISD

MET STANDARD

77

8 MET STANDARD

HARRIS

READING PROGRESS PERCENTILE — DALLAS ALPHA CHARTER SCHOOL (C) percentile ranking of reading progress; BREWSTER ALPINE ISD

¯¯°®®

COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE —¯¯¯¯® 41 45 41  + AVERAGE ¯¯¯®® percentile ranking of combined math and= reading MET STANDARD 62 59 64  + HIGH = ¯¯¯®® progress;

4,805

ALBANY ISD

number of students enrolled in the school district;

FAST27 COMPONENTS — 20 19  + LOW = elements used to determine FASTHIGH rating;= MET STANDARD 35 11 16  + 6

9

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

MET STANDARD

ALBA-GOLDEN ISD 2 ENROLLMENT —

5

8

988

ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEARNING INC (C)

4

5

7

6

DALLAS

A+ ACADEMY (C)

3

4

Financial Allocation Study of Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

1

3

2



BRAZORIA MET STANDARD COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■18,767 ■■■■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ 85 ■

ALVORD ISD AMARILLO ISD AMBASSADORS PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C)

LOW

= ¯¯¯¯® LESS THAN 20 ■  = ¯¯¯°®

HIGH

=

26 + LOW 40-59 ■ ■60 ■   20-39■ ■ 

WISE

703

MET STANDARD

53

50

52 

+

POTTER

33,130

MET STANDARD

66

27

47 

+

GALVESTON

329

MET STANDARD

91

76

89 

+

Susan Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts HIGH Combs = ¯¯°®® ¯¯¯°®

1

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

A+ ACADEMY (C)

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

DALLAS

988

MET STANDARD

65

83

79 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HILL

276

MET STANDARD

70

62

69 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ABBOTT ISD

HALE

765

MET STANDARD

61

32

48 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ABILENE ISD

TAYLOR

16,992

MET STANDARD

69

49

62 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ACADEMY ISD

BELL

1,174

MET STANDARD

62

57

62 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HARRIS

742

MET STANDARD

86

30

63 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

ABERNATHY ISD

ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED LEARNING INC (C) ACADEMY OF CAREERS AND TECHNOLOGIES CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

192

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

ACADEMY OF DALLAS (C)

DALLAS

617

MET STANDARD

19

2

4 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ACCELERATED INTERMEDIATE ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

253

MET STANDARD

99

98

99 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

ADRIAN ISD

OLDHAM

134

MET STANDARD

27

20

19 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

AGUA DULCE ISD

NUECES

368

MET STANDARD

35

11

16 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD

BEXAR

4,805

MET STANDARD

77

79

82 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

ALBA-GOLDEN ISD

WOOD

841

MET STANDARD

41

45

41 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

ALBANY ISD

SHACKELFORD

503

MET STANDARD

62

59

64 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ALDINE ISD

HARRIS

65,415

MET STANDARD

85

46

72 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ALEDO ISD

PARKER

4,712

MET STANDARD

90

80

90 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

ALICE ISD

JIM WELLS

5,472

MET STANDARD

18

5

7 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

ALIEF ISD

HARRIS

45,748

MET STANDARD

84

96

94 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

ALIEF MONTESSORI COMMUNITY SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

297

MET STANDARD

72

71

75 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

19,768

MET STANDARD

96

96

97 

ALLEN ISD

COLLIN DALLAS

127

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

ALPINE ISD

BREWSTER

1,090

MET STANDARD

56

88

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ALTO ISD

CHEROKEE

669

MET STANDARD

43

64

55 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ALPHA CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

ALVARADO ISD

JOHNSON

3,452

MET STANDARD

14

65

34 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ALVIN ISD

BRAZORIA

18,767

MET STANDARD

85

26

60 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

WISE

703

MET STANDARD

53

50

52 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

POTTER

33,130

MET STANDARD

66

27

47 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GALVESTON

329

MET STANDARD

91

76

89 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

ALVORD ISD AMARILLO ISD AMBASSADORS PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C) AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

123

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

AMHERST ISD

LAMB

161

MET STANDARD

29

72

50 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

AMIGOS POR VIDA-FRIENDS FOR LIFE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

510

MET STANDARD

99

78

97 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CHAMBERS

1,202

MET STANDARD

46

15

24 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

GRIMES

729

MET STANDARD

47

17

26 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

ANDREWS ISD

ANDREWS

3,617

MET STANDARD

79

5

30 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

ANGLETON ISD

BRAZORIA

6,444

MET STANDARD

69

27

49 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ANNA ISD

COLLIN

2,520

MET STANDARD

71

22

46 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ANSON ISD

JONES

698

MET STANDARD

56

41

49 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

ANTHONY ISD

EL PASO

855

MET STANDARD

43

91

74 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

ANAHUAC ISD ANDERSON-SHIRO CISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

2

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

ANTON ISD

HOCKLEY

250

MET STANDARD

43

42

42 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

APPLE SPRINGS ISD

TRINITY

209

MET STANDARD

37

90

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

AQUILLA ISD ARANSAS COUNTY ISD ARANSAS PASS ISD

HILL

287

MET STANDARD

9

29

13 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ARANSAS

3,161

MET STANDARD

55

26

39 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SAN PATRICIO

1,841

MET STANDARD

9

15

8 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

55

64

61 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

73

87

85 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

ARCHER CITY ISD

ARCHER

488

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

ARGYLE ISD

DENTON

1,884

MET STANDARD

ARLINGTON CLASSICS ACADEMY (C)

TARRANT

1,176

MET STANDARD

80

98

96 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

ARLINGTON ISD

TARRANT

64,913

MET STANDARD

33

59

45 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

ARP ISD

SMITH

883

MET STANDARD

77

67

76 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ARROW ACADEMY

BRAZOS

867

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

ASPERMONT ISD

STONEWALL

253

MET STANDARD

71

58

68 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ATHENS ISD

HENDERSON

3,344

MET STANDARD

33

31

29 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

ATLANTA ISD

CASS

1,813

MET STANDARD

42

34

36 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

AUBREY ISD

DENTON

2,002

MET STANDARD

64

80

76 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

AUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS (C)

TRAVIS

118

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

AUSTIN CAN ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

387

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

AUSTIN DISCOVERY SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

395

MET STANDARD

20

99

87 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

AUSTIN ISD

TRAVIS

86,233

MET STANDARD

83

78

85 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

AUSTWELL-TIVOLI ISD

REFUGIO

150

MET STANDARD

74

58

70 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

AVALON ISD

ELLIS

321

MET STANDARD

85

68

83 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

AVERY ISD

RED RIVER

385

MET STANDARD

24

70

46 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

CASS

118

MET STANDARD

22

50

33 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DALLAS

520

NOT RATED

98

95

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MCLENNAN

784

MET STANDARD

33

67

50 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

TARRANT

5,912

MET STANDARD

16

24

16 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

SMITH

161

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

BAIRD ISD

CALLAHAN

289

MET STANDARD

22

33

24 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BALLINGER ISD

RUNNELS

945

MET STANDARD

9

66

29 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

BALMORHEA ISD

REEVES

164

MET STANDARD

93

93

96 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

BANDERA

2,443

MET STANDARD

55

34

44 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

BROWN

993

MET STANDARD

34

98

88 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

AVINGER ISD A.W. BROWN-FELLOWSHIP LEADERSHIP ACADEMY (C) AXTELL ISD AZLE ISD AZLEWAY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BANDERA ISD BANGS ISD

NUECES

856

MET STANDARD

84

68

83 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CHAMBERS

4,533

MET STANDARD

93

64

88 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

BARTLETT ISD

BELL

421

MET STANDARD

8

25

11 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

BASTROP ISD

BASTROP

9,268

MET STANDARD

73

37

57 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HARRIS

360

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

17

76

43 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MATAGORDA

3,650

MET STANDARD

25

4

7 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BANQUETE ISD BARBERS HILL ISD

BAY AREA CHARTER INC (C) BAY CITY ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

3

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

HARRIS

450

MET STANDARD

90

95

95 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

BEAUMONT ISD

JEFFERSON

19,830

MET STANDARD

74

34

56 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BECKVILLE ISD

PANOLA

675

MET STANDARD

10

44

20 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BEEVILLE ISD

BEE

3,453

MET STANDARD

2

3

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BELLEVUE ISD

CLAY

158

MET STANDARD

32

76

54 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

GRAYSON

783

MET STANDARD

63

31

48 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

AUSTIN

2,082

MET STANDARD

56

22

36 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BELL

9,896

MET STANDARD

84

70

83 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

JIM WELLS

619

MET STANDARD

59

15

32 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

DUVAL

358

MET STANDARD

27

27

23 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

BEATRICE MAYES INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BELLS ISD BELLVILLE ISD BELTON ISD BEN BOLT-PALITO BLANCO ISD BENAVIDES ISD BENJAMIN ISD

KNOX

71

MET STANDARD

37

60

49 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BEXAR COUNTY ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

458

MET STANDARD

90

40

74 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

BIG SANDY ISD

POLK

495

MET STANDARD

42

43

41 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BIG SANDY ISD

UPSHUR

716

MET STANDARD

68

85

82 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

HOWARD

4,180

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

2

3

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

REAL

165

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

BIRDVILLE ISD

TARRANT

24,119

MET STANDARD

38

74

57 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

BISHOP CISD

NUECES

1,297

MET STANDARD

33

70

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

BLACKWELL CISD

NOLAN

147

MET STANDARD

29

95

72 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BLANCO ISD

BLANCO

949

MET STANDARD

70

53

64 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

BLAND ISD

HUNT

617

MET STANDARD

55

75

67 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

BROWN

240

MET STANDARD

4

59

17 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

CASS

263

MET STANDARD

27

24

21 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

BLOOMING GROVE ISD

NAVARRO

818

MET STANDARD

37

65

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

BLOOMINGTON ISD

VICTORIA

905

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

15

2

3 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

BLUE RIDGE ISD

COLLIN

658

MET STANDARD

37

66

52 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BLUFF DALE ISD

ERATH

117

MET STANDARD

19

85

52 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

HILL

378

MET STANDARD

15

50

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

JEFFERSON

243

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

BOERNE ISD

KENDALL

7,075

MET STANDARD

89

97

97 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

BOLES ISD

HUNT

530

MET STANDARD

33

21

23 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

BOLING ISD

WHARTON

1,068

MET STANDARD

50

6

15 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

BONHAM ISD

FANNIN

1,950

MET STANDARD

55

83

74 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

BOOKER ISD

LIPSCOMB

407

MET STANDARD

87

58

80 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

BORDEN

238

MET STANDARD

80

91

91 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HUTCHINSON

2,782

MET STANDARD

59

56

60 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

BIG SPRING ISD BIG SPRINGS CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BLANKET ISD BLOOMBURG ISD

BLUM ISD BOB HOPE SCHOOL (C)

BORDEN COUNTY ISD BORGER ISD

MCLENNAN

624

MET STANDARD

20

49

30 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BOVINA ISD

PARMER

476

MET STANDARD

68

51

63 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

BOWIE ISD

MONTAGUE

1,686

MET STANDARD

33

41

35 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BOYD ISD

WISE

1,161

MET STANDARD

4

19

7 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

BOSQUEVILLE ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

4

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME BOYS RANCH ISD

COUNTY OLDHAM

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX **

=

**

320

MET STANDARD

61

89

83 

+

= *FAST RATING

KINNEY

620

MET STANDARD

91

58

83 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

BRADY ISD

MCCULLOCH

1,241

MET STANDARD

75

65

74 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

BRAZOS ISD

AUSTIN

821

MET STANDARD

93

68

89 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

226

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

BRACKETT ISD

BRAZOS RIVER CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

SOMERVELL BRAZOS

448

MET STANDARD

35

52

42 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

BRAZOSPORT ISD

BRAZORIA

12,505

MET STANDARD

26

33

26 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BRECKENRIDGE ISD

STEPHENS

1,457

MET STANDARD

87

11

47 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BREMOND ISD

ROBERTSON

433

MET STANDARD

66

29

47 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BRENHAM ISD

BRAZOS SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & CREATIVITY (C)

WASHINGTON

4,943

MET STANDARD

73

11

35 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

BRIDGE CITY ISD

ORANGE

2,764

MET STANDARD

51

36

43 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BRIDGEPORT ISD

WISE

2,199

MET STANDARD

14

30

17 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WICHITA

168

MET STANDARD

1

14

2 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

BRIGHT IDEAS CHARTER (C)

SAN AUGUSTINE

439

MET STANDARD

7

6

5 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

BROCK ISD

PARKER

1,001

MET STANDARD

77

69

77 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

BRONTE ISD

COKE

262

MET STANDARD

81

67

79 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

BROOKELAND ISD

JASPER

402

MET STANDARD

15

84

48 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BROOKESMITH ISD

BROWN

203

MET STANDARD

4

33

10 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

BROOKS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (C)

BEXAR

1,208

MET STANDARD

2

55

9 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

BROOKS COUNTY ISD

BROOKS

1,525

MET STANDARD

44

3

9 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BROWNFIELD ISD

TERRY

1,839

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

12

16

10 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

BROWNSBORO ISD

HENDERSON

2,862

MET STANDARD

46

17

25 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BROWNSVILLE ISD

CAMERON

49,129

MET STANDARD

67

45

59 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BROWNWOOD ISD

BROWN

3,504

MET STANDARD

41

11

18 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MCLENNAN

789

MET STANDARD

47

93

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

15,624

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

68

16

37 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

BROADDUS ISD

BRUCEVILLE-EDDY ISD BRYAN ISD BRYSON ISD

BRAZOS JACK

237

MET STANDARD

91

79

90 

4

10

5 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

BUCKHOLTS ISD

MILAM

184

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

BUENA VISTA ISD

PECOS

123

MET STANDARD

70

83

82 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

BUFFALO ISD

LEON

935

MET STANDARD

12

14

9 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

BULLARD ISD

SMITH

2,177

MET STANDARD

67

53

63 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

BUNA ISD

JASPER

1,533

MET STANDARD

8

17

8 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

BURKBURNETT ISD

WICHITA

3,413

MET STANDARD

56

81

73 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BURKEVILLE ISD

NEWTON

298

MET STANDARD

18

37

23 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

BURLESON ISD

JOHNSON

10,545

MET STANDARD

56

46

52 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BURNET CISD

BURNET

3,203

MET STANDARD

26

57

39 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL DISTRICT (C)

EL PASO

856

MET STANDARD

93

94

96 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WASHINGTON

365

MET STANDARD

23

74

47 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BURTON ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

5

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME BUSHLAND ISD

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

POTTER

1,395

MET STANDARD

67

81

79 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HILL

223

MET STANDARD

96

78

93 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

BYNUM ISD

HUNT

1,553

MET STANDARD

49

91

77 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CALALLEN ISD

NUECES

3,981

MET STANDARD

76

64

75 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CALDWELL ISD

BURLESON

1,821

MET STANDARD

62

40

52 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

CALHOUN COUNTY ISD

CALHOUN

4,253

MET STANDARD

65

22

41 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

COOKE

1,128

MET STANDARD

17

7

8 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

ROBERTSON

143

MET STANDARD

69

39

56 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

38

83

64 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CADDO MILLS ISD

CALLISBURG ISD CALVERT ISD CALVIN NELMS CHARTER SCHOOLS (C)

HARRIS

253

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

CAMERON ISD

MILAM

1,618

MET STANDARD

47

64

57 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

CAMPBELL ISD

HUNT

367

MET STANDARD

25

42

31 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

CANADIAN ISD

HEMPHILL

968

MET STANDARD

48

92

78 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CANTON ISD

VAN ZANDT

2,068

MET STANDARD

82

75

84 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CANUTILLO ISD

EL PASO

6,042

MET STANDARD

68

60

67 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CANYON ISD

RANDALL

9,173

MET STANDARD

73

55

67 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

RUSK

663

MET STANDARD

25

23

20 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

CARRIZO SPRINGS CISD

DIMMIT

2,439

MET STANDARD

24

1

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

CARROLL ISD

TARRANT

7,697

MET STANDARD

97

87

96 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

DALLAS

26,325

MET STANDARD

71

79

79 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

CARLISLE ISD

CARTHAGE ISD

PANOLA

2,863

MET STANDARD

66

29

48 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

CASTLEBERRY ISD

TARRANT

3,808

MET STANDARD

78

37

61 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CAYUGA ISD

ANDERSON

595

MET STANDARD

56

53

56 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

DALLAS

8,243

MET STANDARD

73

88

86 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CEDAR HILL ISD CEDARS INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY (C)

TRAVIS

308

MET STANDARD

76

67

75 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CELESTE ISD

HUNT

475

MET STANDARD

61

96

89 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

CELINA ISD

COLLIN

2,030

MET STANDARD

97

71

94 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CENTER ISD

SHELBY

2,750

MET STANDARD

74

20

45 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CENTER POINT ISD

KERR

642

MET STANDARD

49

74

64 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CENTERVILLE ISD

LEON

668

MET STANDARD

3

15

5 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

TRINITY

118

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

10

3

4 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

NACOGDOCHES

1,082

MET STANDARD

44

86

70 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CENTERVILLE ISD CENTRAL HEIGHTS ISD

ANGELINA

1,540

MET STANDARD

81

30

59 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CHANNELVIEW ISD

HARRIS

8,750

MET STANDARD

95

28

74 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CHANNING ISD

HARTLEY

174

MET STANDARD

8

45

17 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY (C)

TARRANT

488

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

CHAPEL HILL ISD

TITUS

1,008

MET STANDARD

77

89

89 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CHAPEL HILL ISD

SMITH

3,442

MET STANDARD

62

49

58 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

502

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

2

1

1 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

72

52 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CENTRAL ISD

CHARLOTTE ISD CHEROKEE ISD

ATASCOSA SAN SABA

122

MET STANDARD

32

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

6

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

CHESTER ISD

TYLER

181

MET STANDARD

46

35

40 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

CHICO ISD

WISE

588

MET STANDARD

30

35

31 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

DALLAS

904

MET STANDARD

99

99

99 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

CHILDRESS ISD

CHILDRESS

1,134

MET STANDARD

36

17

21 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

CHILLICOTHE ISD

HARDEMAN

181

MET STANDARD

52

80

69 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

FALLS

524

MET STANDARD

40

18

24 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

CHILDREN FIRST ACADEMY OF DALLAS (C)

CHILTON ISD

MCLENNAN

2,392

MET STANDARD

81

87

89 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CHIRENO ISD

NACOGDOCHES

378

MET STANDARD

88

30

65 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CHISUM ISD

LAMAR

837

MET STANDARD

60

78

72 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CHRISTOVAL ISD

TOM GREEN

445

MET STANDARD

50

32

40 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

CISCO ISD

EASTLAND

878

MET STANDARD

81

94

92 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

BEXAR

124

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

6

41

14 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

CITY VIEW ISD

WICHITA

974

MET STANDARD

38

35

35 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

CLARENDON ISD

DONLEY

472

MET STANDARD

76

96

94 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CLARKSVILLE ISD

RED RIVER

648

MET STANDARD

83

41

67 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CHINA SPRING ISD

CITY CENTER HEALTH CAREERS (C)

CLAUDE ISD

ARMSTRONG

366

MET STANDARD

13

92

54 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

CLEAR CREEK ISD

GALVESTON

39,480

MET STANDARD

92

84

92 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CLEBURNE ISD

JOHNSON

6,600

MET STANDARD

13

31

16 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

CLEVELAND ISD

LIBERTY

3,642

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

39

4

11 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

CLIFTON ISD

BOSQUE

997

MET STANDARD

67

83

80 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CLINT ISD

EL PASO

11,719

MET STANDARD

75

56

69 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

CLYDE CISD

CALLAHAN

1,419

MET STANDARD

41

33

35 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COAHOMA ISD

HOWARD

852

MET STANDARD

4

18

7 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

SAN JACINTO

1,619

MET STANDARD

4

5

3 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

COLEMAN ISD

COLEMAN

873

MET STANDARD

45

15

23 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

COLLEGE STATION ISD

BRAZOS

11,022

MET STANDARD

94

56

86 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

COLLINSVILLE ISD

GRAYSON

547

MET STANDARD

19

48

29 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

COLDSPRING-OAKHURST CISD

COLMESNEIL ISD

TYLER

418

MET STANDARD

36

30

31 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COLORADO ISD

MITCHELL

1,107

MET STANDARD

10

20

11 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

COLUMBIA-BRAZORIA ISD

BRAZORIA

3,007

MET STANDARD

30

6

11 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COLUMBUS ISD

COLORADO

1,659

MET STANDARD

49

4

13 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COMAL

18,614

MET STANDARD

67

68

71 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

COMANCHE ISD

COMANCHE

1,232

MET STANDARD

19

84

51 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

COMFORT ISD

KENDALL

1,115

MET STANDARD

28

82

58 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

COMMERCE ISD

HUNT

1,573

MET STANDARD

37

9

15 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

COMAL ISD

COMMUNITY ISD COMO-PICKTON CISD COMPASS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL COMQUEST ACADEMY (C)

COLLIN

1,634

MET STANDARD

42

10

17 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HOPKINS

796

MET STANDARD

65

89

83 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

ECTOR

373

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

64

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

HARRIS

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

7

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

COMSTOCK ISD

VAL VERDE

208

MET STANDARD

61

97

91 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

CONNALLY ISD

MCLENNAN

2,393

MET STANDARD

21

27

19 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

MONTGOMERY

53,632

MET STANDARD

86

74

85 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

LIMESTONE

322

MET STANDARD

72

23

47 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

COOPER ISD

DELTA

773

MET STANDARD

62

12

30 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COPPELL ISD

DALLAS

10,960

MET STANDARD

75

79

82 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

COPPERAS COVE ISD

CORYELL

8,355

MET STANDARD

83

62

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CORPUS CHRISTI ISD

NUECES

39,142

MET STANDARD

16

29

18 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

CORPUS CHRISTI MONTESSORI SCHOOL (C)

NUECES

165

MET STANDARD

21

89

58 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

POLK

1,020

MET STANDARD

37

58

48 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

NAVARRO

5,891

MET STANDARD

58

10

26 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HALE

131

MET STANDARD

19

92

60 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

LA SALLE

1,289

MET STANDARD

11

4

5 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WILLIAMSON

106

MET STANDARD

30

65

47 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

CONROE ISD COOLIDGE ISD

CORRIGAN-CAMDEN ISD CORSICANA ISD COTTON CENTER ISD COTULLA ISD COUPLAND ISD COVINGTON ISD

HILL

253

MET STANDARD

65

47

59 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

CRANDALL ISD

KAUFMAN

3,029

MET STANDARD

63

68

69 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CRANE ISD

CRANE

1,070

MET STANDARD

12

15

9 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

CRANFILLS GAP ISD

BOSQUE

126

MET STANDARD

67

24

45 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CRAWFORD ISD

MCLENNAN

576

MET STANDARD

69

96

91 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

CROCKETT COUNTY CONSOLIDATED CSD

CROCKETT

801

MET STANDARD

16

23

15 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

CROCKETT ISD

HOUSTON

1,255

MET STANDARD

30

2

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

HARRIS

5,145

MET STANDARD

69

46

60 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CROSBY ISD CROSBYTON CISD

CROSBY

385

MET STANDARD

50

21

31 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

CROSS PLAINS ISD

CALLAHAN

346

MET STANDARD

72

81

81 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

CROSS ROADS ISD

HENDERSON

604

MET STANDARD

53

31

40 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

92

60

85 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

CROSSTIMBERS ACADEMY (C)

PARKER

118

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

CROWELL ISD

FOARD

218

MET STANDARD

CROWLEY ISD

TARRANT

15,000

MET STANDARD

18

37

23 

24

1

3 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

CRYSTAL CITY ISD

ZAVALA

1,992

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

CUERO ISD

DEWITT

2,086

MET STANDARD

54

30

40 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

CULBERSON

432

MET STANDARD

9

52

22 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

CULBERSON COUNTY-ALLAMOORE ISD

SMITH

483

MET STANDARD

61

82

76 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CUMBY ISD

HOPKINS

402

MET STANDARD

12

63

31 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

CUSHING ISD

NACOGDOCHES

494

MET STANDARD

80

57

73 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

CYPRESS-FAIRBANKS ISD

HARRIS

109,733

MET STANDARD

87

90

92 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

D’HANIS ISD

MEDINA

337

MET STANDARD

4

45

13 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

DAINGERFIELD-LONE STAR ISD

MORRIS

1,138

MET STANDARD

25

33

26 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

DALHART ISD

DALLAM

1,749

MET STANDARD

6

14

7 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

CUMBERLAND ACADEMY (C)

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

8

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

VERY LOW

=

**

2,092

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

DALLAS

263

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

DALLAS

579

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

DALLAS

158,680

MET STANDARD

34

28

28 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DALLAS CAN ACADEMY CHARTER (C)

DALLAS

DALLAS COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL (C) DALLAS COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE (C) DALLAS ISD DAMON ISD

BRAZORIA

173

MET STANDARD

54

15

29 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

DANBURY ISD

BRAZORIA

778

MET STANDARD

83

23

56 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

DARROUZETT ISD

LIPSCOMB

126

MET STANDARD

39

21

26 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DAWSON ISD

DAWSON

163

MET STANDARD

31

72

51 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DAWSON ISD

NAVARRO

425

MET STANDARD

23

30

22 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DAYTON ISD

LIBERTY

5,067

MET STANDARD

61

13

30 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

DE LEON ISD

COMANCHE

623

MET STANDARD

32

27

26 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

DECATUR ISD

WISE

3,024

MET STANDARD

43

28

33 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

DEER PARK ISD

HARRIS

12,790

MET STANDARD

78

36

62 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

DEKALB ISD

BOWIE

811

MET STANDARD

24

18

15 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

DEL VALLE ISD

TRAVIS

11,317

MET STANDARD

77

38

61 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

DELL CITY ISD

HUDSPETH

63

MET STANDARD

32

91

68 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

DENISON ISD

GRAYSON

4,397

MET STANDARD

53

77

67 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

DENTON ISD

DENTON

25,714

MET STANDARD

60

83

76 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

DENVER CITY ISD

YOAKUM

1,686

MET STANDARD

79

88

89 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

DESOTO ISD

DALLAS

8,884

MET STANDARD

56

54

56 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

DETROIT ISD

RED RIVER

486

MET STANDARD

1

9

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

DEVERS ISD

LIBERTY

178

MET STANDARD

74

79

81 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

DEVINE ISD

MEDINA

2,001

MET STANDARD

22

25

19 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

FREESTONE

156

MET STANDARD

91

50

80 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

DEW ISD DEWEYVILLE ISD

NEWTON

659

MET STANDARD

44

18

25 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

DIBOLL ISD

ANGELINA

1,996

MET STANDARD

76

28

52 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

DICKINSON ISD

GALVESTON

9,728

MET STANDARD

83

8

39 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

FRIO

975

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

8

3

3 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

78

22

50 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

DILLEY ISD DIME BOX ISD

LEE

176

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

DIMMITT ISD

CASTRO

1,215

MET STANDARD

15

38

22 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

KERR

13

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

DIVIDE ISD DODD CITY ISD

FANNIN

347

MET STANDARD

77

68

76 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

DONNA ISD

HIDALGO

15,245

MET STANDARD

47

4

10 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

DOSS CONSOLIDATED CSD

GILLESPIE

29

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

NACOGDOCHES

393

MET STANDARD

61

82

76 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

83

64

79 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

DOUGLASS ISD DR ML GARZA-GONZALEZ CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

NUECES

228

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

DRAW ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

477

MET STANDARD

HAYS

4,765

MET STANDARD

97

99

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

NUECES

292

MET STANDARD

72

39

58 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

DRIPPING SPRINGS ISD DRISCOLL ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

9

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

DUBLIN ISD

ERATH

1,198

MET STANDARD

35

12

17 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

DUMAS ISD

MOORE

4,662

MET STANDARD

36

37

34 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

13,238

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

16

69

39 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

DUNCANVILLE ISD

DALLAS

EAGLE ADVANTAGE SCHOOLS (C)

DALLAS

1,971

MET STANDARD

31

95

74 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

EAGLE MT-SAGINAW ISD

TARRANT

17,674

MET STANDARD

52

71

64 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

EAGLE PASS ISD

MAVERICK

15,015

MET STANDARD

78

52

69 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

TRAVIS

7,837

MET STANDARD

97

99

98 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

EANES ISD

BROWN

1,185

MET STANDARD

92

71

89 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

EAST BERNARD ISD

WHARTON

956

MET STANDARD

71

55

65 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

EAST CENTRAL ISD

BEXAR

9,562

MET STANDARD

21

21

17 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

CHAMBERS

1,372

MET STANDARD

37

40

37 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

EARLY ISD

EAST CHAMBERS ISD EAST FORT WORTH MONTESSORI ACADEMY (C) EAST TEXAS CHARTER SCHOOLS (C) EASTLAND ISD ECTOR COUNTY ISD

549

MET STANDARD

32

88

65 

TARRANT GREGG

167

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

EASTLAND

1,145

MET STANDARD

52

63

59 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ECTOR

29,575

MET STANDARD

10

6

6 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

ECTOR ISD

FANNIN

274

MET STANDARD

23

38

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

EDCOUCH-ELSA ISD

HIDALGO

5,149

MET STANDARD

17

12

10 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

EDEN CISD

CONCHO

244

MET STANDARD

9

93

50 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

EDEN PARK ACADEMY (C)

TRAVIS

653

MET STANDARD

96

87

95 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

EDGEWOOD ISD

BEXAR

11,931

MET STANDARD

11

4

5 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

EDGEWOOD ISD

VAN ZANDT

898

MET STANDARD

63

94

88 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

EDINBURG CISD

HIDALGO

33,582

MET STANDARD

53

65

61 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

EDNA ISD

JACKSON

1,535

MET STANDARD

52

33

42 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

DALLAS

140

MET STANDARD

2

19

4 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

EHRHART SCHOOL (C)

JEFFERSON

251

MET STANDARD

57

51

56 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

EL CAMPO ISD

WHARTON

3,520

MET STANDARD

7

10

6 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

EL PASO ACADEMY (C)

EL PASO

479

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

EL PASO ISD

EL PASO

62,884

MET STANDARD

87

54

77 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

52

55

54 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

EDUCATION CENTER INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY (C)

ELECTRA ISD

WICHITA

440

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

ELGIN ISD

BASTROP

4,122

MET STANDARD

26

36

28 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ELKHART ISD

ANDERSON

1,236

MET STANDARD

28

83

59 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ELYSIAN FIELDS ISD

HARRISON

1,003

MET STANDARD

44

63

55 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

ENNIS ISD

ELLIS

5,782

MET STANDARD

21

9

9 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

ERA ISD

COOKE

450

MET STANDARD

11

75

37 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ERATH

168

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

NACOGDOCHES

141

MET STANDARD

11

19

11 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

91

85 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ERATH EXCELS ACADEMY INC (C) ETOILE ISD EULA ISD

CALLAHAN

378

MET STANDARD

66

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

10

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

EUSTACE ISD

HENDERSON

1,447

MET STANDARD

40

56

49 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

EVADALE ISD

JASPER

456

MET STANDARD

29

86

62 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

EVANT ISD

CORYELL

216

MET STANDARD

25

5

8 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

EVERMAN ISD

TARRANT

5,385

MET STANDARD

76

67

75 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

DALLAS

421

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

EXCEL ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

441

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

EXCELLENCE IN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY (C)

HIDALGO

59

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

EXCELSIOR ISD

SHELBY

119

MET STANDARD

79

66

77 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

EVOLUTION ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

EZZELL ISD

LAVACA

61

MET STANDARD

30

40

34 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

FABENS ISD

EL PASO

2,383

MET STANDARD

87

35

67 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

FREESTONE

1,762

MET STANDARD

96

86

96 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

FAITH FAMILY ACADEMY OF OAK CLIFF (C)

DALLAS

2,041

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

FALLBROOK COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

352

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

FALLS CITY ISD

KARNES

359

MET STANDARD

94

86

94 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

FANNINDEL ISD

DELTA

195

MET STANDARD

97

6

62 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

FARMERSVILLE ISD

COLLIN

1,471

MET STANDARD

48

39

42 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

FARWELL ISD

PARMER

581

MET STANDARD

22

59

38 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

FAYETTEVILLE ISD

FAYETTE

213

MET STANDARD

41

38

38 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ELLIS

2,406

MET STANDARD

23

28

21 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

FLATONIA ISD

FAYETTE

606

MET STANDARD

95

84

94 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

FLORENCE ISD

FAIRFIELD ISD

FERRIS ISD

WILLIAMSON

991

MET STANDARD

39

15

21 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

FLORESVILLE ISD

WILSON

3,806

MET STANDARD

87

64

83 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

FLOUR BLUFF ISD

NUECES

5,596

MET STANDARD

63

42

54 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

FLOYDADA ISD

FLOYD

806

MET STANDARD

92

14

56 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

FOCUS LEARNING ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

920

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

FOLLETT ISD

LIPSCOMB

184

MET STANDARD

89

20

60 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

FORESTBURG ISD

MONTAGUE

193

MET STANDARD

48

80

66 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

FORNEY ISD

KAUFMAN

8,540

MET STANDARD

70

78

78 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

FORSAN ISD

HOWARD

685

MET STANDARD

17

80

46 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

FORT BEND ISD

FORT BEND

69,123

MET STANDARD

90

86

92 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

FORT DAVIS ISD

JEFF DAVIS

302

MET STANDARD

43

81

65 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

FORT ELLIOTT CISD

WHEELER

136

MET STANDARD

8

38

16 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

FORT HANCOCK ISD

HUDSPETH

482

MET STANDARD

96

82

95 

+

**

=

**

FORT SAM HOUSTON ISD

BEXAR

1,605

MET STANDARD

51

98

91 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

FORT STOCKTON ISD

PECOS

2,393

MET STANDARD

40

18

23 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TARRANT

521

MET STANDARD

18

98

80 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

52

34

42 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

FORT WORTH ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS (C) FORT WORTH CAN ACADEMY (C)

TARRANT

639

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

FORT WORTH ISD

TARRANT

83,255

MET STANDARD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

11

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

FRANKLIN ISD

ROBERTSON

1,071

MET STANDARD

96

95

97 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

FRANKSTON ISD

ANDERSON

751

MET STANDARD

49

64

58 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

FREDERICKSBURG ISD

GILLESPIE

2,971

MET STANDARD

38

86

67 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

DUVAL

803

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

15

1

3 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

LUBBOCK

7,967

MET STANDARD

78

76

81 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GALVESTON

5,984

MET STANDARD

95

81

93 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

PARMER

1,194

MET STANDARD

38

18

22 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

FREER ISD FRENSHIP ISD FRIENDSWOOD ISD FRIONA ISD FRISCO ISD

COLLIN

42,530

MET STANDARD

98

97

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

FROST ISD

NAVARRO

383

MET STANDARD

51

28

38 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

FRUITVALE ISD

VAN ZANDT

407

MET STANDARD

5

65

22 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

COOKE

2,779

MET STANDARD

8

31

13 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

GAINESVILLE ISD

HARRIS

22,012

MET STANDARD

95

60

88 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

GALVESTON

6,695

MET STANDARD

31

13

16 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

GANADO ISD

JACKSON

709

MET STANDARD

44

50

47 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

GARLAND ISD

DALLAS

57,914

MET STANDARD

64

81

77 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

GALENA PARK ISD GALVESTON ISD

PARKER

190

MET STANDARD

58

46

53 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

NACOGDOCHES

747

MET STANDARD

64

42

54 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

GARY ISD

PANOLA

411

MET STANDARD

37

36

34 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GATESVILLE ISD

CORYELL

2,902

MET STANDARD

26

29

24 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WEBB

455

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

GATEWAY CHARTER ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

804

MET STANDARD

53

32

41 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

GAUSE ISD

MILAM

209

MET STANDARD

75

19

44 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GEORGE GERVIN ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

1,228

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

GEORGE I SANCHEZ CHARTER (C)

HARRIS

609

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

GARNER ISD GARRISON ISD

GATEWAY (STUDENT ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM INC) (C)

GEORGE WEST ISD

LIVE OAK

1,108

MET STANDARD

23

46

32 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GEORGETOWN ISD

WILLIAMSON

10,328

MET STANDARD

85

54

76 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

GHOLSON ISD

MCLENNAN

201

MET STANDARD

82

48

70 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

GIDDINGS ISD

LEE

1,904

MET STANDARD

79

38

63 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

UPSHUR

2,390

MET STANDARD

39

47

42 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

7

6

4 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

GILMER ISD GIRLS & BOYS PREP ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

752

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

GLADEWATER ISD

GREGG

1,982

MET STANDARD

59

15

31 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

GLASSCOCK COUNTY ISD

GLASSCOCK

289

MET STANDARD

93

71

90 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

GLEN ROSE ISD

SOMERVELL

1,688

MET STANDARD

77

26

53 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

JOHNSON

1,667

MET STANDARD

49

29

37 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

MONTAGUE

132

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

40

24

29 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

DALLAS

1,215

MET STANDARD

93

97

97 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

GODLEY ISD GOLD BURG ISD GOLDEN RULE CHARTER SCHOOL (C) GOLDTHWAITE ISD

MILLS

579

MET STANDARD

68

53

63 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GOLIAD ISD

GOLIAD

1,347

MET STANDARD

60

14

31 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

12

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME GONZALES ISD GOODRICH ISD GOOSE CREEK CISD

COUNTY GONZALES

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE 2,804

MET STANDARD

POLK

234

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

HARRIS

21,743

MET STANDARD

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

46

75 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

51

35

42 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

74

35

57 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

88

GORDON ISD

PALO PINTO

235

MET STANDARD

20

30

20 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GORMAN ISD

EASTLAND

330

MET STANDARD

43

44

43 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MARTIN

232

MET STANDARD

86

75

86 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

PALO PINTO

330

MET STANDARD

28

79

54 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

GRADY ISD GRAFORD ISD GRAHAM ISD

YOUNG

2,574

MET STANDARD

38

51

44 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GRANBURY ISD

HOOD

6,510

MET STANDARD

84

75

85 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GRAND PRAIRIE ISD

DALLAS

26,803

MET STANDARD

74

57

69 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

GRAND SALINE ISD

VAN ZANDT

1,090

MET STANDARD

5

62

20 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WARD

130

MET STANDARD

38

25

28 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

JOHNSON

1,142

MET STANDARD

86

46

73 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

GRAY

42

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

GRANGER ISD

WILLIAMSON

410

MET STANDARD

82

47

70 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

GRAPE CREEK ISD

TOM GREEN

1,062

MET STANDARD

28

32

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GRAPELAND ISD

HOUSTON

464

MET STANDARD

39

25

29 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE ISD

GRANDFALLS-ROYALTY ISD GRANDVIEW ISD GRANDVIEW-HOPKINS ISD

TARRANT

13,328

MET STANDARD

71

90

87 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

GREENVILLE ISD

HUNT

4,649

MET STANDARD

36

47

40 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

GREENWOOD ISD

MIDLAND

1,875

MET STANDARD

49

38

43 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

SAN PATRICIO

4,488

MET STANDARD

80

54

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

GREGORY-PORTLAND ISD

LIMESTONE

1,725

MET STANDARD

15

3

4 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

GROOM ISD

CARSON

137

MET STANDARD

71

66

72 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GROVETON ISD

TRINITY

748

MET STANDARD

54

15

28 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HANSFORD

426

MET STANDARD

74

67

75 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GUNTER ISD

GRAYSON

805

MET STANDARD

62

71

70 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GUSTINE ISD

COMANCHE

237

MET STANDARD

40

12

19 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

GUTHRIE CSD

KING

92

MET STANDARD

88

71

86 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HALE CENTER ISD

HALE

671

MET STANDARD

17

47

28 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

GROESBECK ISD

GRUVER ISD

LAVACA

1,005

MET STANDARD

68

42

57 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

HALLSBURG ISD

MCLENNAN

141

MET STANDARD

65

34

50 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

HALLSVILLE ISD

HARRISON

4,598

MET STANDARD

89

61

83 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

HAMILTON ISD

HAMILTON

772

MET STANDARD

22

73

45 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HAMLIN ISD

JONES

464

MET STANDARD

60

13

31 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HAMPTON PREPARATORY (C)

DALLAS

776

MET STANDARD

61

85

78 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

JEFFERSON

1,709

MET STANDARD

78

30

56 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

HAPPY ISD

SWISHER

241

MET STANDARD

84

63

78 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HARDIN ISD

LIBERTY

1,281

MET STANDARD

70

52

64 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HARDIN-JEFFERSON ISD

HARDIN

2,081

MET STANDARD

96

45

86 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

HARLANDALE ISD

BEXAR

15,154

MET STANDARD

48

23

32 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HALLETTSVILLE ISD

HAMSHIRE-FANNETT ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

13

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

HARLETON ISD

HARRISON

726

MET STANDARD

36

97

83 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

HARLINGEN CISD

CAMERON

18,411

MET STANDARD

52

14

26 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

HARMONY ISD

UPSHUR

1,098

MET STANDARD

6

91

43 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HARMONY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE (C)

HARRIS

3,860

MET STANDARD

56

64

63 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HARMONY SCHOOL OF SCIENCE (HOUSTON) (C)

HARRIS

1,496

MET STANDARD

99

98

99 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (AUSTIN) (C)

TRAVIS

2,960

MET STANDARD

46

74

63 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

CAMERON

438

MET STANDARD

15

23

15 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (EL PASO) (C)

EL PASO

2,260

MET STANDARD

1

29

4 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (FORT WORTH) (C)

TARRANT

3,422

MET STANDARD

29

85

60 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HARRIS

3,481

MET STANDARD

42

79

63 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

849

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

1

2

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (BROWNSVILLE) (C)

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (HOUSTON) (C) HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (LUBBOCK) (C)

LUBBOCK BEXAR

2,148

MET STANDARD

6

97

58 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (WACO) (C)

MCLENNAN

3,702

MET STANDARD

81

96

95 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HARPER ISD

GILLESPIE

576

MET STANDARD

85

67

82 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

HARROLD ISD

WILBARGER

102

MET STANDARD

36

34

33 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HARMONY SCIENCE ACADEMY (SAN ANTONIO) (C)

HART ISD

CASTRO

287

MET STANDARD

52

21

33 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

HARTLEY ISD

HARTLEY

198

MET STANDARD

95

98

98 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

TITUS

471

MET STANDARD

51

93

80 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HASKELL

659

MET STANDARD

56

43

50 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HARTS BLUFF ISD HASKELL CISD HAWKINS ISD

WOOD

765

MET STANDARD

44

11

20 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

HAWLEY ISD

JONES

720

MET STANDARD

66

61

66 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HAYS CISD

HAYS

16,525

MET STANDARD

53

48

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HEARNE ISD

ROBERTSON

981

MET STANDARD

78

2

17 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

HEDLEY ISD

DONLEY

116

MET STANDARD

75

73

77 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HEMPHILL ISD

SABINE

926

MET STANDARD

55

48

52 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HEMPSTEAD ISD

WALLER

1,525

MET STANDARD

29

12

14 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HENDERSON ISD

RUSK

3,426

MET STANDARD

58

75

70 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

911

MET STANDARD

17

48

29 

HENRIETTA ISD

CLAY BEXAR

203

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

5

96

50 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HEREFORD ISD

DEAF SMITH

4,229

MET STANDARD

15

6

7 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

HERMLEIGH ISD

SCURRY

240

MET STANDARD

4

13

6 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

HENRY FORD ACADEMY ALAMEDA SCHOOL (C)

HICO ISD

HAMILTON

548

MET STANDARD

84

47

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HIDALGO ISD

HIDALGO

3,306

MET STANDARD

30

10

13 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

145

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

13

20

12 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

642

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

HIGGINS ISD

LIPSCOMB

HIGGS, CARTER, KING GIFTED & TALENTED CHARTER ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR GALVESTON

170

MET STANDARD

13

66

34 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

HIGHLAND ISD

NOLAN

245

MET STANDARD

92

61

84 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

HIGHLAND PARK ISD

DALLAS

6,828

MET STANDARD

98

87

97 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HIGHLAND PARK ISD

POTTER

917

MET STANDARD

42

40

40 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

HIGH ISLAND ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

14

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME HILLSBORO ISD

COUNTY HILL

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE 1,970

MET STANDARD

HITCHCOCK ISD

GALVESTON

1,405

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

HOLLAND ISD

BELL

610

MET STANDARD

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

90

96 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

26

13

14 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

36

6

11 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

97

HOLLIDAY ISD

ARCHER

887

MET STANDARD

59

73

69 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HONDO ISD

MEDINA

2,174

MET STANDARD

9

8

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

584

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

23

19

15 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

66

58

65 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HONEY GROVE ISD

FANNIN

HONORS ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

627

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

HOOKS ISD

BOWIE

882

MET STANDARD

25

77

50 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

HOUSTON CAN ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

753

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

HOUSTON GATEWAY ACADEMY INC (C)

HARRIS

1,485

MET STANDARD

99

54

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

206

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

HOUSTON HEIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

HOUSTON HEIGHTS LEARNING ACADEMY INC (C)

HARRIS

128

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

HOUSTON ISD

HARRIS

202,586

MET STANDARD

72

55

66 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

GRAYSON

1,008

MET STANDARD

44

82

66 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HUBBARD ISD

HILL

384

MET STANDARD

55

78

70 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HUBBARD ISD

BOWIE

99

MET STANDARD

87

56

78 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HUCKABAY ISD

ERATH

158

MET STANDARD

70

86

83 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HUDSON ISD

ANGELINA

2,726

MET STANDARD

78

49

68 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HUFFMAN ISD

HOWE ISD

HARRIS

3,272

MET STANDARD

30

13

15 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HUGHES SPRINGS ISD

CASS

1,192

MET STANDARD

45

55

50 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HULL-DAISETTA ISD

LIBERTY

521

MET STANDARD

28

19

19 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

HUMBLE ISD

HARRIS

36,867

MET STANDARD

84

79

86 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

KERR

193

MET STANDARD

64

77

74 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

HUNTINGTON ISD

ANGELINA

1,735

MET STANDARD

54

23

35 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

HUNTSVILLE ISD

WALKER

6,321

MET STANDARD

42

15

21 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD

TARRANT

21,775

MET STANDARD

94

95

96 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

HUTTO ISD

WILLIAMSON

5,746

MET STANDARD

43

68

57 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

IDALOU ISD

LUBBOCK

928

MET STANDARD

86

20

56 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS (C)

HIDALGO

12,567

MET STANDARD

98

99

99 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

COLLIN

900

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

INDUSTRIAL ISD

JACKSON

1,179

MET STANDARD

88

95

95 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

INGLESIDE ISD

SAN PATRICIO

2,287

MET STANDARD

27

32

26 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

KERR

954

MET STANDARD

1

7

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

HUNT ISD

IMAGINE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF NORTH TEXAS (C)

INGRAM ISD INSPIRED VISION ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

982

MET STANDARD

50

96

87 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

IOLA ISD

GRIMES

466

MET STANDARD

87

11

46 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

IOWA PARK CISD

WICHITA

1,784

MET STANDARD

46

11

20 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

IRA ISD

SCURRY

255

MET STANDARD

84

77

85 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

85

70 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

IRAAN-SHEFFIELD ISD

PECOS

530

MET STANDARD

46

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

15

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

BOSQUE

131

MET STANDARD

45

41

42 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

IRION

300

MET STANDARD

41

51

46 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

IRVING ISD

DALLAS

34,961

MET STANDARD

39

68

55 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ITALY ISD

ELLIS

544

MET STANDARD

61

61

64 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

ITASCA ISD

HILL

720

MET STANDARD

26

58

39 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

JACKSBORO ISD

JACK

977

MET STANDARD

31

75

53 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

CHEROKEE

4,855

MET STANDARD

64

52

61 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

HARRIS

140

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

JARRELL ISD

WILLIAMSON

1,076

MET STANDARD

80

59

74 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

JASPER ISD

JASPER

2,647

MET STANDARD

29

62

44 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

KENT

144

MET STANDARD

57

88

79 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

JEAN MASSIEU ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

200

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

JEFFERSON ISD

MARION

1,241

MET STANDARD

34

40

35 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

JIM HOGG COUNTY ISD

IREDELL ISD IRION COUNTY ISD

JACKSONVILLE ISD JAMIE’S HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

JAYTON-GIRARD ISD

JIM HOGG

1,117

MET STANDARD

27

16

16 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

JIM NED CISD

TAYLOR

1,014

MET STANDARD

63

67

68 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

JOAQUIN ISD

SHELBY

746

MET STANDARD

91

55

81 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

JOHN H WOOD JR PUBLIC CHARTER DISTRICT (C)

BEXAR

557

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

JOHNSON CITY ISD

BLANCO

721

MET STANDARD

73

53

66 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

JONESBORO ISD

CORYELL

166

MET STANDARD

42

22

28 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

JOSHUA ISD

JOHNSON

4,885

MET STANDARD

77

53

69 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

JOURDANTON ISD

ATASCOSA

1,470

MET STANDARD

19

27

18 

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

JUAN B GALAVIZ CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

75

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

JUBILEE ACADEMIC CENTER (C)

BEXAR

2,378

MET STANDARD

13

82

44 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

JUDSON ISD

BEXAR

22,576

MET STANDARD

40

43

40 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

JUNCTION ISD

KIMBLE

678

MET STANDARD

10

35

16 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

KARNACK ISD

HARRISON

179

MET STANDARD

6

4

4 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

KARNES

1,060

MET STANDARD

46

57

52 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

HAYS

137

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

19

52

32 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HARRIS

64,408

MET STANDARD

93

84

93 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

KAUFMAN

3,752

MET STANDARD

28

29

25 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

94

93

96 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

91

87 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

KARNES CITY ISD KATHERINE ANNE PORTER SCHOOL (C) KATY ISD KAUFMAN ISD KEENE ISD

JOHNSON

902

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

KELLER ISD

TARRANT

33,254

MET STANDARD

69

KELTON ISD

WHEELER

140

MET STANDARD

32

53

41 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

KEMP ISD

KAUFMAN

1,457

MET STANDARD

9

25

12 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

KENEDY COUNTY WIDE CSD

KENEDY

83

MET STANDARD

64

61

65 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

KENEDY ISD

KARNES

652

MET STANDARD

4

14

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

KENNARD ISD

HOUSTON

301

MET STANDARD

12

12

8 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

KENNEDALE ISD

TARRANT

3,147

MET STANDARD

45

71

61 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

KERENS ISD

NAVARRO

650

MET STANDARD

31

29

27 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

16

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

WINKLER

1,357

MET STANDARD

5

1

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

KERRVILLE ISD

KERR

4,926

MET STANDARD

83

76

84 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

KILGORE ISD

GREGG

3,921

MET STANDARD

12

45

21 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

KILLEEN ISD

BELL

41,687

MET STANDARD

57

73

68 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

KLEBERG

3,543

MET STANDARD

3

4

2 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

BEXAR

1,201

MET STANDARD

88

77

88 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

KERMIT ISD

KINGSVILLE ISD KIPP ASPIRE ACADEMY (C) KIPP AUSTIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC (C)

TRAVIS

2,081

MET STANDARD

99

99

99 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

KIPP INC CHARTER (C)

HARRIS

6,695

MET STANDARD

85

90

92 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

KIPP SOUTHEAST HOUSTON (C)

HARRIS

1,889

MET STANDARD

51

69

62 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

KIPP TRUTH ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

354

MET STANDARD

98

50

91 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

KIRBYVILLE CISD

JASPER

1,465

MET STANDARD

47

39

42 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

KLEIN ISD

HARRIS

46,778

MET STANDARD

81

72

82 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

KLONDIKE ISD

DAWSON

245

MET STANDARD

88

73

86 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

KNIPPA ISD

UVALDE

323

MET STANDARD

90

36

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

KNOX

297

MET STANDARD

57

46

53 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

KNOX CITY-O’BRIEN CISD KOINONIA COMMUNITY LEARNING ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

176

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

KOPPERL ISD

BOSQUE

234

MET STANDARD

40

88

71 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

KOUNTZE ISD

HARDIN

1,303

MET STANDARD

3

5

2 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

KRESS ISD

SWISHER

234

MET STANDARD

27

31

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

KRUM ISD

DENTON

1,891

MET STANDARD

46

56

51 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LA ACADEMIA DE ESTRELLAS (C)

DALLAS

950

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

LA AMISTAD LOVE & LEARNING ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

344

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

EL PASO

268

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

LA FERIA ISD

CAMERON

3,679

MET STANDARD

31

21

22 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

LA GLORIA ISD

JIM WELLS

106

MET STANDARD

38

52

45 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

LA GRANGE ISD

FAYETTE

1,900

MET STANDARD

71

49

63 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LA JOYA ISD

HIDALGO

29,177

MET STANDARD

58

16

32 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

GALVESTON

2,862

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

18

3

4 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

LA PORTE ISD

HARRIS

7,723

MET STANDARD

57

38

49 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

LA PRYOR ISD

ZAVALA

481

MET STANDARD

13

69

36 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

LA VEGA ISD

LA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL (C)

LA MARQUE ISD

MCLENNAN

2,875

MET STANDARD

19

7

8 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

LA VERNIA ISD

WILSON

3,056

MET STANDARD

45

31

37 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LA VILLA ISD

HIDALGO

647

MET STANDARD

33

73

54 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BEXAR

1,054

MET STANDARD

96

98

98 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

LACKLAND ISD LAGO VISTA ISD

TRAVIS

1,339

MET STANDARD

65

80

76 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LAKE DALLAS ISD

DENTON

4,007

MET STANDARD

85

65

81 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

LAKE TRAVIS ISD

TRAVIS

7,779

MET STANDARD

94

87

94 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

LAKE WORTH ISD

TARRANT

3,243

MET STANDARD

9

8

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

LAMAR CISD

FORT BEND

26,064

MET STANDARD

72

79

80 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LAMESA ISD

DAWSON

1,950

MET STANDARD

3

10

4 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

17

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

LAMPASAS ISD

LAMPASAS

3,396

MET STANDARD

58

48

55 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LANCASTER ISD

DALLAS

6,536

MET STANDARD

62

51

59 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LANEVILLE ISD

RUSK

156

MET STANDARD

75

20

46 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LAPOYNOR ISD

HENDERSON

455

MET STANDARD

16

80

46 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LAREDO ISD

WEBB

24,797

MET STANDARD

45

17

25 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

LASARA ISD

WILLACY

501

MET STANDARD

42

84

66 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LATEXO ISD

HOUSTON

485

MET STANDARD

10

63

30 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

LAZBUDDIE ISD

PARMER

183

MET STANDARD

56

49

54 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LEADERSHIP PREP SCHOOL

DENTON

350

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

LEAKEY ISD

REAL

264

MET STANDARD

34

94

73 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

LEANDER ISD

WILLIAMSON

34,265

MET STANDARD

79

89

90 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

LEARY ISD

BOWIE

109

MET STANDARD

45

64

55 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LEFORS ISD

GRAY

172

MET STANDARD

46

60

53 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

DALLAS

820

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

LEGGETT ISD

POLK

187

MET STANDARD

35

88

67 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LEON ISD

LEON

715

MET STANDARD

11

39

19 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

LEONARD ISD

FANNIN

869

MET STANDARD

25

55

37 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

LEVELLAND ISD

HOCKLEY

3,033

MET STANDARD

37

17

21 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

RUSK

256

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

6

53

19 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

LEWISVILLE ISD

DENTON

52,399

MET STANDARD

90

87

93 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LEXINGTON ISD

LEE

914

MET STANDARD

53

25

36 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

LIBERTY HILL ISD

LEGACY PREPARATORY (C)

LEVERETTS CHAPEL ISD

WILLIAMSON

2,845

MET STANDARD

95

72

91 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

LIBERTY ISD

LIBERTY

2,121

MET STANDARD

39

8

15 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

LIBERTY-EYLAU ISD

BOWIE

2,750

MET STANDARD

18

61

35 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

LIFE SCHOOL (C)

DALLAS

4,206

MET STANDARD

94

95

96 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

LIGHTHOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

233

MET STANDARD

20

9

10 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

LINDALE ISD

SMITH

3,748

MET STANDARD

93

82

92 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

LINDEN-KILDARE CISD

CASS

801

MET STANDARD

25

61

40 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LINDSAY ISD

COOKE

520

MET STANDARD

65

44

57 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LINGLEVILLE ISD

ERATH

238

MET STANDARD

77

44

64 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LIPAN ISD

HOOD

312

MET STANDARD

14

28

15 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CISD

ORANGE

3,406

MET STANDARD

40

32

34 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

LITTLE ELM ISD

DENTON

6,378

MET STANDARD

46

61

54 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LITTLEFIELD ISD

LAMB

1,423

MET STANDARD

25

28

23 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

LIVINGSTON ISD

POLK

4,092

MET STANDARD

41

3

9 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

LLANO ISD

LLANO

1,829

MET STANDARD

84

74

84 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

CALDWELL

4,958

MET STANDARD

82

13

44 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

FLOYD

513

MET STANDARD

13

34

18 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

MCCULLOCH

89

MET STANDARD

18

81

49 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

LOCKHART ISD LOCKNEY ISD LOHN ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

18

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

LOMETA ISD

LAMPASAS

309

MET STANDARD

69

69

72 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LONDON ISD

NUECES

613

MET STANDARD

63

62

65 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LONE OAK ISD

HUNT

921

MET STANDARD

75

69

76 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LONGVIEW ISD

GREGG

8,819

MET STANDARD

49

22

32 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LOOP ISD

GAINES

112

MET STANDARD

83

78

85 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

15

55

30 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

34

78

58 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LORAINE ISD

MITCHELL

134

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

LORENA ISD

MCLENNAN

1,650

MET STANDARD

CROSBY

302

MET STANDARD

33

51

41 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LOS FRESNOS CISD

CAMERON

10,406

MET STANDARD

96

70

92 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

LOUISE ISD

WHARTON

483

MET STANDARD

86

43

71 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LOVEJOY ISD

COLLIN

3,638

MET STANDARD

91

94

95 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

LORENZO ISD

LOVELADY ISD

HOUSTON

485

MET STANDARD

48

68

60 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

LUBBOCK ISD

LUBBOCK

28,929

MET STANDARD

26

48

34 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

LUBBOCK-COOPER ISD

LUBBOCK

4,626

MET STANDARD

86

74

85 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LUEDERS-AVOCA ISD

JONES

114

MET STANDARD

36

21

24 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

8,494

MET STANDARD

86

35

67 

LUFKIN ISD

CALDWELL

1,409

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

4

1

1 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

LUMBERTON ISD

HARDIN

3,886

MET STANDARD

37

53

44 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

LYFORD CISD

WILLACY

1,573

MET STANDARD

69

26

48 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

LYTLE ISD

ATASCOSA

1,736

MET STANDARD

44

60

53 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MABANK ISD

KAUFMAN

3,384

MET STANDARD

81

29

58 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MADISONVILLE CISD

MADISON

2,244

MET STANDARD

67

36

53 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

MONTGOMERY

11,956

MET STANDARD

34

35

33 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LULING ISD

MAGNOLIA ISD

ANGELINA

MAINLAND PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C)

GALVESTON

392

MET STANDARD

87

82

90 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MALAKOFF ISD

HENDERSON

1,271

MET STANDARD

47

62

55 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MALONE ISD

HILL

97

MET STANDARD

18

74

42 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MALTA ISD

BOWIE

147

MET STANDARD

5

32

11 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

MANARA ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

457

MET STANDARD

78

71

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

MANOR ISD

TRAVIS

8,039

MET STANDARD

53

40

47 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

MANSFIELD ISD

TARRANT

32,831

MET STANDARD

63

76

73 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MARATHON ISD

BREWSTER

50

MET STANDARD

66

77

75 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

MARBLE FALLS ISD

BURNET

4,037

MET STANDARD

58

53

57 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MARFA ISD

PRESIDIO

329

MET STANDARD

26

66

45 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

MARION ISD

GUADALUPE

1,318

MET STANDARD

49

81

69 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MARLIN ISD

FALLS

987

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

16

16

12 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MARSHALL ISD

HARRISON

5,554

MET STANDARD

15

10

9 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

MART ISD

MCLENNAN

560

MET STANDARD

97

56

91 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

MARTINS MILL ISD

VAN ZANDT

483

MET STANDARD

92

98

98 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MARTINSVILLE ISD

NACOGDOCHES

358

MET STANDARD

39

93

74 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

19

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

MASON

713

MET STANDARD

94

84

93 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MATAGORDA ISD

MATAGORDA

157

MET STANDARD

13

43

22 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

MATHIS ISD

SAN PATRICIO

1,653

MET STANDARD

11

14

8 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MAUD ISD

BOWIE

479

MET STANDARD

32

22

23 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MAY ISD

BROWN

265

MET STANDARD

45

18

26 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MAYPEARL ISD

ELLIS

1,005

MET STANDARD

56

81

73 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MCALLEN ISD

HIDALGO

24,815

MET STANDARD

50

39

45 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MCCAMEY ISD

UPTON

534

MET STANDARD

20

8

9 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MCDADE ISD

BASTROP

215

MET STANDARD

82

85

88 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MCGREGOR ISD

MCLENNAN

1,360

MET STANDARD

59

26

41 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

MCKINNEY ISD

COLLIN

24,316

MET STANDARD

85

92

93 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MCLEAN ISD

GRAY

201

MET STANDARD

48

87

72 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

MCLEOD ISD

CASS

412

MET STANDARD

69

16

38 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

MCMULLEN

249

MET STANDARD

88

84

90 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

TERRY

325

MET STANDARD

31

60

44 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

MASON ISD

MCMULLEN COUNTY ISD MEADOW ISD MEADOWLAND CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

KENDALL

70

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

MEDICAL CENTER CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

348

MET STANDARD

33

60

46 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MEDINA ISD

BANDERA

266

MET STANDARD

68

92

87 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

MEDINA VALLEY ISD

MEDINA

3,642

MET STANDARD

93

49

82 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MELISSA ISD

COLLIN

1,686

MET STANDARD

86

65

82 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MEMPHIS ISD

HALL

536

MET STANDARD

75

84

84 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MENARD ISD

MENARD

339

MET STANDARD

32

46

37 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

MERCEDES ISD

HIDALGO

5,681

MET STANDARD

26

17

17 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MERIDIAN ISD MERIDIAN SCHOOL

BOSQUE

508

MET STANDARD

94

89

95 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WILLIAMSON

785

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

MERKEL ISD

TAYLOR

1,181

MET STANDARD

22

35

24 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

MESQUITE ISD

DALLAS

39,028

MET STANDARD

88

85

91 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LIMESTONE

2,054

MET STANDARD

29

31

27 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HARRIS

151

MET STANDARD

62

75

72 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MEYERSVILLE ISD

DEWITT

122

MET STANDARD

63

63

65 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

MIAMI ISD

ROBERTS

215

MET STANDARD

95

54

87 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

14

20

13 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

MEXIA ISD MEYERPARK ELEMENTARY (C)

MID-VALLEY ACADEMY (C)

HIDALGO

363

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

MIDLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

MIDLAND

490

MET STANDARD

MIDLAND ISD

MIDLAND

23,249

MET STANDARD

43

18

24 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ELLIS

7,524

MET STANDARD

84

65

80 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MIDWAY ISD

MCLENNAN

7,337

MET STANDARD

50

71

63 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

MIDWAY ISD

CLAY

95

MET STANDARD

90

45

76 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

MILANO ISD

MILAM

401

MET STANDARD

69

5

23 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

MILDRED ISD

NAVARRO

720

MET STANDARD

80

72

81 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MIDLOTHIAN ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

20

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME MILES ISD MILFORD ISD

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

RUNNELS

442

MET STANDARD

80

26

55 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

ELLIS

228

MET STANDARD

94

40

79 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

MILLER GROVE ISD

HOPKINS

224

MET STANDARD

26

59

40 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MILLSAP ISD

PARKER

794

MET STANDARD

64

57

64 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

MINEOLA ISD

WOOD

1,598

MET STANDARD

48

37

41 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

PALO PINTO

3,474

MET STANDARD

35

12

17 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

HIDALGO

15,471

MET STANDARD

33

34

31 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WARD

2,139

MET STANDARD

29

3

7 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MONTAGUE ISD

MONTAGUE

112

MET STANDARD

41

58

49 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MONTE ALTO ISD

HIDALGO

1,046

MET STANDARD

60

9

25 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

MONTGOMERY

7,173

MET STANDARD

87

67

84 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MCLENNAN

657

MET STANDARD

72

89

87 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

16

70

39 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MINERAL WELLS ISD MISSION CISD MONAHANS-WICKETT-PYOTE ISD

MONTGOMERY ISD MOODY ISD MORAN ISD

SHACKELFORD

123

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

MORGAN ISD

BOSQUE

103

MET STANDARD

7

41

15 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

MORGAN MILL ISD

ERATH

119

MET STANDARD

96

49

87 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

MORTON ISD

COCHRAN

422

MET STANDARD

17

15

12 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

MOTLEY COUNTY ISD

MOTLEY

188

MET STANDARD

11

27

14 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

MOULTON ISD

LAVACA

293

MET STANDARD

73

95

91 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

HILL

180

MET STANDARD

11

28

14 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

MOUNT CALM ISD MOUNT ENTERPRISE ISD

RUSK

386

MET STANDARD

1

58

9 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

MOUNT PLEASANT ISD

TITUS

5,524

MET STANDARD

39

38

37 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

FRANKLIN

1,612

MET STANDARD

43

74

60 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

COOKE

475

MET STANDARD

90

39

73 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

MOUNT VERNON ISD MUENSTER ISD MULESHOE ISD

BAILEY

1,486

MET STANDARD

95

19

65 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MULLIN ISD

MILLS

106

MET STANDARD

17

65

37 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MUMFORD ISD

ROBERTSON

597

MET STANDARD

67

73

73 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

MUNDAY CISD

KNOX

381

MET STANDARD

34

76

56 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

HENDERSON

179

MET STANDARD

6

87

39 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

NACOGDOCHES

6,447

MET STANDARD

61

10

26 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

NATALIA ISD

MEDINA

1,135

MET STANDARD

14

62

32 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

NAVARRO ISD

GUADALUPE

1,622

MET STANDARD

80

83

87 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MURCHISON ISD NACOGDOCHES ISD

NAVASOTA ISD

GRIMES

2,995

MET STANDARD

8

9

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

NAZARETH ISD

CASTRO

237

MET STANDARD

34

96

79 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

NECHES ISD

ANDERSON

406

MET STANDARD

29

39

33 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

NEDERLAND ISD

JEFFERSON

5,014

MET STANDARD

20

47

30 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

FORT BEND

2,769

MET STANDARD

82

69

81 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

NEW BOSTON ISD

BOWIE

1,380

MET STANDARD

22

72

44 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

NEW BRAUNFELS ISD

COMAL

8,063

MET STANDARD

72

87

85 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MONTGOMERY

11,510

MET STANDARD

44

34

38 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

19

19 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

NEEDVILLE ISD

NEW CANEY ISD NEW DEAL ISD

LUBBOCK

711

MET STANDARD

28

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

21

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

NEW DIANA ISD

UPSHUR

1,024

MET STANDARD

11

50

24 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

NEW FRONTIERS CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

627

MET STANDARD

12

1

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

LYNN

262

MET STANDARD

85

67

83 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

CHEROKEE

497

MET STANDARD

66

11

32 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

NEW WAVERLY ISD

WALKER

889

MET STANDARD

53

60

58 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

NEWCASTLE ISD

YOUNG

195

MET STANDARD

98

79

97 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

NEW HOME ISD NEW SUMMERFIELD ISD

NEWMAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ARLINGTON

TARRANT

475

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

NEWTON ISD

NEWTON

1,071

MET STANDARD

7

10

6 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

NIXON-SMILEY CISD

GONZALES

1,010

MET STANDARD

11

26

13 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

NOCONA ISD

MONTAGUE

816

MET STANDARD

24

56

37 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

DEWITT

138

MET STANDARD

64

37

52 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

NORMANGEE ISD

LEON

521

MET STANDARD

71

25

48 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

NORTH EAST ISD

BEXAR

67,701

MET STANDARD

80

84

87 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

7

1

1 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

NORDHEIM ISD

NORTH FOREST ISD

HARRIS

6,690

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

NORTH HILLS PREPARATORY SCHOOL (C)

DALLAS

1,961

MET STANDARD

98

97

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

22

59

37 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

NORTH HOPKINS ISD

HOPKINS

467

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

NORTH LAMAR ISD

LAMAR

2,914

MET STANDARD

45

11

20 

+

MADISON

344

MET STANDARD

6

45

16 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

NORTHSIDE ISD

WILBARGER

175

MET STANDARD

2

35

7 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

NORTHSIDE ISD

BEXAR

99,426

MET STANDARD

76

87

86 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

NORTHWEST ISD

DENTON

17,752

MET STANDARD

71

75

77 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

97

68

93 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

NORTH ZULCH ISD

NORTHWEST PREPARATORY (C)

HARRIS

389

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

NOVA ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

207

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

NOVA ACADEMY (SOUTHEAST) (C)

DALLAS

650

MET STANDARD

88

97

96 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

NUECES CANYON CISD

EDWARDS

254

MET STANDARD

16

88

53 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

NURSERY ISD

VICTORIA

102

MET STANDARD

1

51

9 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TRAVIS

843

MET STANDARD

89

99

98 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

LYNN

290

MET STANDARD

19

7

8 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

NYOS CHARTER SCHOOL (C) O’DONNELL ISD

LEON

210

MET STANDARD

59

24

39 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SAN PATRICIO

1,043

MET STANDARD

9

58

25 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

GALVESTON

679

MET STANDARD

1

85

19 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

OGLESBY ISD

CORYELL

168

MET STANDARD

39

85

66 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

OLFEN ISD

RUNNELS

52

MET STANDARD

13

44

22 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

OLNEY ISD

YOUNG

746

MET STANDARD

73

19

43 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

OLTON ISD

LAMB

669

MET STANDARD

63

70

70 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

ONALASKA ISD

POLK

943

MET STANDARD

52

43

48 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

OAKWOOD ISD ODEM-EDROY ISD ODYSSEY ACADEMY INC (C)

ONE STOP MULTISERVICE CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HIDALGO

1,203

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

ORANGE GROVE ISD

JIM WELLS

1,880

MET STANDARD

17

44

26 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ORANGEFIELD ISD

ORANGE

1,707

MET STANDARD

65

46

58 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

22

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME ORE CITY ISD

COUNTY UPSHUR

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE 847

MET STANDARD

ORENDA CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BELL

998

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

OVERTON ISD

RUSK

517

MET STANDARD

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

18

25 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

2

17

4 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

10

50

22 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

44

PADUCAH ISD

COTTLE

220

MET STANDARD

37

89

68 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

PAINT CREEK ISD

HASKELL

156

MET STANDARD

49

77

64 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

PAINT ROCK ISD

CONCHO

242

MET STANDARD

2

90

28 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

MATAGORDA

1,489

MET STANDARD

79

64

76 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

PALACIOS ISD PALESTINE ISD PALMER ISD PALO PINTO ISD PAMPA ISD

ANDERSON

3,288

MET STANDARD

54

14

28 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ELLIS

1,097

MET STANDARD

87

98

97 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

PALO PINTO

123

MET STANDARD

98

65

94 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GRAY

3,668

MET STANDARD

18

26

18 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PANHANDLE ISD

CARSON

665

MET STANDARD

28

67

47 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

PANOLA CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

PANOLA

169

MET STANDARD

14

72

38 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

PANTHER CREEK CISD

COLEMAN

161

MET STANDARD

40

88

70 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ERATH

3,824

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

PARADIGM ACCELERATED CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

WISE

1,083

MET STANDARD

17

54

31 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

PARIS ISD

LAMAR

3,571

MET STANDARD

41

23

28 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PASADENA ISD

HARRIS

53,449

MET STANDARD

69

60

68 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

PARADISE ISD

PASO DEL NORTE (C)

EL PASO

282

PATTON SPRINGS ISD

DICKENS

106

MET STANDARD

82

56

74 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BEE

156

MET STANDARD

67

47

60 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

DALLAS

1,578

MET STANDARD

99

99

99 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

BRAZORIA

19,581

MET STANDARD

91

91

94 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

2

1

1 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PAWNEE ISD PEAK PREPARATORY SCHOOL (C) PEARLAND ISD PEARSALL ISD

FRIO

2,236

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

PEASTER ISD

PARKER

1,018

MET STANDARD

25

12

13 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

PECOS-BARSTOW-TOYAH ISD

REEVES

2,266

MET STANDARD

16

22

14 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

PEGASUS SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES (C)

DALLAS

780

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

PENELOPE ISD

HILL

189

MET STANDARD

24

29

23 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

PERRIN-WHITT CISD

JACK

364

MET STANDARD

12

37

19 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

OCHILTREE

2,396

MET STANDARD

14

30

17 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

PETERSBURG ISD

HALE

272

MET STANDARD

33

42

35 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PETROLIA ISD

CLAY

475

MET STANDARD

11

32

16 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

57

24

38 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

18

41

25 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

PERRYTON ISD

PETTUS ISD

BEE

427

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

PEWITT CISD

MORRIS

1,070

MET STANDARD

TRAVIS

23,302

MET STANDARD

75

86

85 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD

HIDALGO

32,025

MET STANDARD

20

16

13 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

PHOENIX CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HUNT

602

MET STANDARD

2

76

18 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

DENTON

1,510

MET STANDARD

63

90

84 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

PFLUGERVILLE ISD

PILOT POINT ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

23

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME PINE TREE ISD PINEYWOODS COMMUNITY ACADEMY (C)

COUNTY

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

4,603

MET STANDARD

54

32

42 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ANGELINA

635

MET STANDARD

44

73

60 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

CAMP

2,515

MET STANDARD

65

39

55 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

YOAKUM

447

MET STANDARD

78

26

54 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

HALE

5,795

MET STANDARD

48

24

33 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

COLLIN

54,921

MET STANDARD

89

92

94 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

PLAINVIEW ISD PLANO ISD

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

GREGG

PITTSBURG ISD PLAINS ISD

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

BOWIE

2,040

MET STANDARD

67

80

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ATASCOSA

3,487

MET STANDARD

66

4

20 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HUTCHINSON

636

MET STANDARD

24

24

20 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

CAMERON

2,632

MET STANDARD

60

70

68 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

PONDER ISD

DENTON

1,244

MET STANDARD

76

93

90 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

POOLVILLE ISD

PARKER

511

MET STANDARD

3

9

3 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

27

23

21 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PLEASANT GROVE ISD PLEASANTON ISD PLEMONS-STINNETT-PHILLIPS CISD POINT ISABEL ISD

POR VIDA ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

311

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

PORT ARANSAS ISD

NUECES

524

MET STANDARD

62

94

87 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

PORT ARTHUR ISD

JEFFERSON

8,992

MET STANDARD

83

49

71 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

PORT NECHES-GROVES ISD

JEFFERSON

4,850

MET STANDARD

24

36

27 

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

167

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

POST ISD

GARZA

817

MET STANDARD

59

47

55 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ATASCOSA

1,773

MET STANDARD

6

2

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

POTEET ISD POTH ISD

WILSON

816

MET STANDARD

76

55

69 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

POTTSBORO ISD

GRAYSON

1,342

MET STANDARD

67

44

58 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

PRAIRIE LEA ISD

CALDWELL

211

MET STANDARD

11

17

10 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

PRAIRIE VALLEY ISD

MONTAGUE

141

MET STANDARD

76

63

73 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

LAMAR

1,126

MET STANDARD

36

33

33 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

PRAIRILAND ISD PREMIER LEARNING ACADEMY

GALVESTON

362

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

PREMONT ISD

JIM WELLS

544

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

1

1

1 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

PRESIDIO ISD

PRESIDIO

1,440

MET STANDARD

41

73

59 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

MILLS

101

MET STANDARD

34

42

36 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TARRANT

577

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

COLLIN

3,433

MET STANDARD

45

92

77 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

HANSFORD

123

MET STANDARD

50

40

44 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

HIDALGO

2,157

MET STANDARD

40

8

15 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

PRIDDY ISD PRIME PREP ACADEMY (C) PRINCETON ISD PRINGLE-MORSE CISD PROGRESO ISD PROSPER ISD

COLLIN

5,496

MET STANDARD

98

92

97 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

QUANAH ISD

HARDEMAN

545

MET STANDARD

71

78

78 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

QUEEN CITY ISD

CASS

1,041

MET STANDARD

64

82

78 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

QUINLAN ISD

HUNT

2,534

MET STANDARD

27

36

30 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

72

68 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

QUITMAN ISD

WOOD

1,165

MET STANDARD

59

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

24

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

RADIANCE ACADEMY OF LEARNING (C)

BEXAR

482

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

RAINS ISD

RAINS

1,652

MET STANDARD

67

63

68 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

RALLS ISD

CROSBY

568

MET STANDARD

5

22

8 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

DUVAL

27

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

42

27

32 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

VAN ZANDT

100

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

RAMIREZ CSD RANCH ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

1,192

MET STANDARD

75

95

92 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

RANGER ISD

EASTLAND

452

MET STANDARD

26

6

9 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

RANKIN ISD

UPTON

261

MET STANDARD

54

42

49 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

MCLENNAN

572

MET STANDARD

60

97

90 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

RAUL YZAGUIRRE SCHOOL FOR SUCCESS (C)

HARRIS

1,338

MET STANDARD

75

4

21 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

RAVEN SCHOOL (C)

WALKER

100

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

RAYMONDVILLE ISD

WILLACY

2,197

MET STANDARD

4

5

3 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

REAGAN COUNTY ISD

REAGAN

884

MET STANDARD

5

11

5 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

RECONCILIATION ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

201

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

RANDOLPH FIELD ISD

RAPOPORT ACADEMY PUBLIC SCHOOL (C)

RED LICK ISD

BOWIE

516

MET STANDARD

16

54

30 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

RED OAK ISD

ELLIS

5,617

MET STANDARD

58

36

48 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

REDWATER ISD

BOWIE

1,161

MET STANDARD

30

16

18 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

REFUGIO

728

MET STANDARD

77

57

71 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

RESPONSIVE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS (C)

TAYLOR

10,537

MET STANDARD

36

82

63 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

RICARDO ISD

KLEBERG

681

MET STANDARD

97

80

95 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

RICE CISD

COLORADO

1,268

MET STANDARD

50

23

34 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

RICE ISD

NAVARRO

856

MET STANDARD

54

61

60 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

REFUGIO ISD

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (AMARILLO) (C)

POTTER

215

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (ECTOR COUNTY) (C)

ECTOR

642

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

TARRANT

196

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

LOW

=

**

HARRIS

222

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOL (C)

BELL

156

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

RICHARD MILBURN ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOL (C)

NUECES

217

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (FORT WORTH) (C)

RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY (SUBURBAN HOUSTON) (C)

RICHARDS ISD

GRIMES

149

MET STANDARD

3

25

7 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

RICHARDSON ISD

DALLAS

37,954

MET STANDARD

96

69

92 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

RICHLAND COLLEGIATE HIGH SCHOOL OF MATH, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (C)

DALLAS

444

MET STANDARD

44

63

55 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

RICHLAND SPRINGS ISD

SAN SABA

130

MET STANDARD

20

33

22 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

RIESEL ISD

MCLENNAN

609

MET STANDARD

85

48

72 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

STARR

10,796

MET STANDARD

73

21

46 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

RIO GRANDE CITY CISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

25

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

RIO HONDO ISD

CAMERON

2,212

MET STANDARD

65

13

33 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

RIO VISTA ISD

JOHNSON

814

MET STANDARD

8

5

4 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

HARRIS

1,941

MET STANDARD

94

62

88 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

RISE ACADEMY (C)

LUBBOCK

238

MET STANDARD

98

98

99 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

RISING STAR ISD

EASTLAND

191

MET STANDARD

28

91

65 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

RIVER ROAD ISD

POTTER

1,449

MET STANDARD

62

5

19 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

RIVERCREST ISD

RED RIVER

712

MET STANDARD

51

10

21 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

RIVIERA ISD

KLEBERG

462

MET STANDARD

8

28

12 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

ROBERT LEE ISD

COKE

240

MET STANDARD

23

34

25 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ROBINSON ISD

MCLENNAN

2,244

MET STANDARD

48

40

44 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

3,086

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

6

2

2 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

RIPLEY HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

ROBSTOWN ISD

NUECES FISHER

242

MET STANDARD

48

80

67 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

ROCHELLE ISD

MCCULLOCH

214

MET STANDARD

5

76

29 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ROCKDALE ISD

MILAM

1,588

MET STANDARD

41

22

28 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

EDWARDS

271

MET STANDARD

26

37

29 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

ROBY CISD

ROCKSPRINGS ISD

ROCKWALL

14,359

MET STANDARD

82

69

81 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

ROGERS ISD

BELL

838

MET STANDARD

31

42

35 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

ROMA ISD

STARR

6,479

MET STANDARD

70

24

46 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LUBBOCK

1,055

MET STANDARD

48

40

43 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ROCKWALL ISD

ROOSEVELT ISD ROPES ISD

HOCKLEY

313

MET STANDARD

33

60

45 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ROSCOE ISD

NOLAN

452

MET STANDARD

80

95

93 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

ROSEBUD-LOTT ISD

FALLS

687

MET STANDARD

41

27

32 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

ROTAN ISD

FISHER

310

MET STANDARD

40

24

29 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ROUND ROCK ISD ROUND TOP-CARMINE ISD

WILLIAMSON

45,588

MET STANDARD

89

88

93 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

FAYETTE

260

MET STANDARD

49

89

75 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

89

56

81 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

3 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

ROXTON ISD

LAMAR

185

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

ROYAL ISD

WALLER

2,088

MET STANDARD

10

2

ROCKWALL

4,900

MET STANDARD

43

54

49 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

RULE ISD

HASKELL

129

MET STANDARD

6

92

43 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

RUNGE ISD

KARNES

302

MET STANDARD

5

14

6 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

RUSK ISD

CHEROKEE

2,226

MET STANDARD

42

31

34 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

S AND S CISD

GRAYSON

832

MET STANDARD

4

41

11 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SABINAL ISD

UVALDE

521

MET STANDARD

51

3

11 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SABINE ISD

GREGG

1,325

MET STANDARD

55

33

44 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

SABINE PASS ISD

JEFFERSON

344

MET STANDARD

97

93

97 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SAINT JO ISD

MONTAGUE

282

MET STANDARD

58

26

40 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

SALADO ISD

BELL

1,348

MET STANDARD

76

92

89 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

SALTILLO ISD

HOPKINS

256

MET STANDARD

88

77

88 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

SAM RAYBURN ISD

FANNIN

483

MET STANDARD

35

39

35 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ROYSE CITY ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

26

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME SAN ANGELO ISD

COUNTY TOM GREEN

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

14,427

MET STANDARD

62

51

59 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

SAN ANTONIO CAN HIGH SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

435

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

SAN ANTONIO ISD

BEXAR

54,236

MET STANDARD

23

41

29 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

SAN ANTONIO SCHOOL FOR INQUIRY & CREATIVITY (C)

BEXAR

423

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

SAN ANTONIO TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

77

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

HIGH

=

**

SAN AUGUSTINE

822

MET STANDARD

15

3

5 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

CAMERON

11,160

MET STANDARD

55

28

40 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SAN DIEGO ISD

DUVAL

1,342

MET STANDARD

23

2

5 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

SAN ELIZARIO ISD

EL PASO

4,127

MET STANDARD

42

21

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

VAL VERDE

10,300

MET STANDARD

32

8

13 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

STARR

263

MET STANDARD

24

82

54 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

SAN MARCOS CISD

HAYS

7,509

MET STANDARD

55

25

38 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SAN PERLITA ISD

WILLACY

280

MET STANDARD

83

66

80 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SAN SABA ISD

SAN SABA

726

MET STANDARD

65

38

53 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SAN VICENTE ISD

BREWSTER

23

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

DAWSON

224

MET STANDARD

89

76

89 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

HUTCHINSON

850

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

3

19

6 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

DENTON

2,662

MET STANDARD

53

64

61 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

SAN AUGUSTINE ISD SAN BENITO CISD

SAN FELIPE-DEL RIO CISD SAN ISIDRO ISD

SANDS CISD SANFORD-FRITCH ISD SANGER ISD

COLEMAN

270

MET STANDARD

50

38

43 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

GALVESTON

4,657

MET STANDARD

8

2

2 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

SANTA GERTRUDIS ISD

KLEBERG

517

MET STANDARD

29

49

37 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SANTA MARIA ISD

CAMERON

729

MET STANDARD

24

1

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SANTA ROSA ISD

CAMERON

1,166

MET STANDARD

21

20

16 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

37

8

14 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SANTA ANNA ISD SANTA FE ISD

SANTO ISD

PALO PINTO

508

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

SAVOY ISD

FANNIN

271

MET STANDARD

9

91

49 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-UNIVERSAL CITY ISD

GUADALUPE

13,540

MET STANDARD

89

74

88 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SCHLEICHER ISD

SCHLEICHER

582

MET STANDARD

70

37

56 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION (C)

BEXAR

1,527

MET STANDARD

98

66

95 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (C)

BEXAR

843

MET STANDARD

22

90

60 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DISCOVERY (C)

BEXAR

910

MET STANDARD

1

31

3 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SCHULENBURG ISD

FAYETTE

691

MET STANDARD

38

38

36 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

SCURRY-ROSSER ISD

KAUFMAN

1,005

MET STANDARD

81

44

67 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SEAGRAVES ISD

GAINES

612

MET STANDARD

49

30

36 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SEALY ISD

AUSTIN

2,676

MET STANDARD

81

34

62 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

NUECES

433

MET STANDARD

92

78

91 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

GUADALUPE

7,457

MET STANDARD

27

9

12 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SEMINOLE ISD

GAINES

2,630

MET STANDARD

92

33

72 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SER-NINOS CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

954

MET STANDARD

99

96

99 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SEASHORE MIDDLE ACADEMY (C) SEGUIN ISD

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

27

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

SEYMOUR ISD

BAYLOR

582

MET STANDARD

79

52

70 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SHALLOWATER ISD

LUBBOCK

1,557

MET STANDARD

72

94

90 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

SHAMROCK ISD

WHEELER

428

MET STANDARD

46

42

43 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SHARYLAND ISD

HIDALGO

10,205

MET STANDARD

95

78

92 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

SHEKINAH RADIANCE ACADEMY (C)

BEXAR

890

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

SHELBYVILLE ISD

SHELBY

824

MET STANDARD

71

18

41 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SHELDON ISD

HARRIS

7,549

MET STANDARD

62

51

59 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SHEPHERD ISD

SAN JACINTO

1,870

MET STANDARD

20

2

4 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

SHERMAN ISD

GRAYSON

6,899

MET STANDARD

76

59

71 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SHINER ISD

LAVACA

601

MET STANDARD

89

75

88 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

SIDNEY ISD

COMANCHE

131

MET STANDARD

12

69

34 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

HUDSPETH

162

MET STANDARD

14

88

50 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SILSBEE ISD

HARDIN

2,758

MET STANDARD

47

13

22 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

SILVERTON ISD

BRISCOE

195

MET STANDARD

79

89

89 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

SIMMS ISD

BOWIE

499

MET STANDARD

47

12

21 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SIERRA BLANCA ISD

SINTON ISD SIVELLS BEND ISD

SAN PATRICIO

2,182

MET STANDARD

23

32

24 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

COOKE

59

MET STANDARD

12

47

23 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

BEE

821

MET STANDARD

94

93

96 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

LUBBOCK

1,272

MET STANDARD

5

8

5 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SKIDMORE-TYNAN ISD SLATON ISD SLIDELL ISD

WISE

251

MET STANDARD

58

86

77 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SLOCUM ISD

ANDERSON

439

MET STANDARD

51

77

66 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

SMITHVILLE ISD

BASTROP

1,768

MET STANDARD

81

61

76 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SMYER ISD

HOCKLEY

406

MET STANDARD

51

51

51 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

42

8

16 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SNOOK ISD

BURLESON

527

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

SNYDER ISD

SCURRY

2,788

MET STANDARD

22

17

14 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

SOCORRO ISD

EL PASO

44,054

MET STANDARD

81

66

79 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

SOMERSET ISD

BEXAR

3,888

MET STANDARD

35

13

18 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

BURLESON

486

MET STANDARD

3

6

3 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

SUTTON

932

MET STANDARD

53

44

49 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LUBBOCK

188

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

BEXAR

9,828

MET STANDARD

21

13

12 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

SOUTH TEXAS ISD

CAMERON

3,381

MET STANDARD

80

83

86 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

SOUTHLAND ISD

GARZA

174

MET STANDARD

39

57

48 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SOUTHSIDE ISD

BEXAR

5,123

MET STANDARD

38

46

41 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SOUTHWEST ISD

BEXAR

12,991

MET STANDARD

23

25

20 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

**

**

**

+

VERY HIGH

=

**

SOMERVILLE ISD SONORA ISD SOUTH PLAINS (C) SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD

SOUTHWEST PREPARATORY SCHOOL (C)

BEXAR

508

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

SOUTHWEST SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

1,728

MET STANDARD

1

19

2 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

HANSFORD

876

MET STANDARD

88

60

81 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

SPEARMAN ISD

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

28

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME SPLENDORA ISD SPRING BRANCH ISD SPRING CREEK ISD

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

MONTGOMERY

3,488

MET STANDARD

21

5

8 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

HARRIS

34,778

MET STANDARD

73

62

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

108

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

57

86

77 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

HUTCHINSON

SPRING HILL ISD

GREGG

1,898

MET STANDARD

70

47

62 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

SPRING ISD

HARRIS

36,028

MET STANDARD

8

22

10 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

SPRINGLAKE-EARTH ISD

LAMB

413

MET STANDARD

36

16

20 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

PARKER

3,452

MET STANDARD

27

11

13 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

SPRINGTOWN ISD

DICKENS

296

MET STANDARD

29

80

56 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SPURGER ISD

TYLER

421

MET STANDARD

19

77

45 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

ST ANTHONY SCHOOL (C)

DALLAS

302

MET STANDARD

82

57

75 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

BEE

431

MET STANDARD

74

70

75 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SPUR ISD

ST MARY’S ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C) STAFFORD MSD

FORT BEND

3,353

MET STANDARD

61

70

68 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

STAMFORD ISD

JONES

673

MET STANDARD

90

51

79 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

STANTON ISD

MARTIN

836

MET STANDARD

20

12

11 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

STAR CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

365

MET STANDARD

93

97

97 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

MILLS

59

MET STANDARD

31

73

52 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

NACOGDOCHES

252

MET STANDARD

52

94

82 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

STEPHENVILLE ISD

ERATH

3,685

MET STANDARD

73

45

62 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

STEPPING STONES CHARTER ELEMENTARY (C)

HARRIS

290

MET STANDARD

43

96

82 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

STAR ISD STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

STERLING CITY ISD

STERLING

263

MET STANDARD

47

31

38 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

STOCKDALE ISD

WILSON

825

MET STANDARD

29

91

67 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

STRATFORD ISD

SHERMAN

591

MET STANDARD

90

57

82 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

STRAWN ISD

PALO PINTO

193

MET STANDARD

82

7

36 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

LAMB

456

MET STANDARD

92

82

91 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

SULPHUR BLUFF ISD

HOPKINS

229

MET STANDARD

32

48

38 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

SULPHUR SPRINGS ISD

HOPKINS

4,188

MET STANDARD

35

63

49 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

SUMMIT INTERNATIONAL PREPARATORY (C)

TARRANT

1,692

MET STANDARD

99

99

99 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

SUDAN ISD

SUNDOWN ISD

HOCKLEY

694

MET STANDARD

97

58

91 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

SUNNYVALE ISD

DALLAS

1,288

MET STANDARD

86

93

93 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

SUNRAY ISD

MOORE

526

MET STANDARD

85

73

84 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

SWEENY ISD

BRAZORIA

1,917

MET STANDARD

90

42

74 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

SWEET HOME ISD

LAVACA

144

MET STANDARD

35

29

29 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SWEETWATER ISD

NOLAN

2,189

MET STANDARD

30

52

39 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

SAN PATRICIO

1,088

MET STANDARD

21

2

5 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

LYNN

608

MET STANDARD

87

22

58 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

TAFT ISD TAHOKA ISD

LIBERTY

1,850

MET STANDARD

10

19

10 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

TATUM ISD

RUSK

1,631

MET STANDARD

47

43

45 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

TAYLOR ISD

WILLIAMSON

3,181

MET STANDARD

74

27

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

TEAGUE ISD

FREESTONE

1,234

MET STANDARD

17

12

10 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

93

84 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

TARKINGTON ISD

TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION CHARTER HIGH (C)

HIDALGO

881

MET STANDARD

57

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

29

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

JEFFERSON

515

MET STANDARD

21

1

1 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

TEMPLE EDUCATION CENTER (C)

BELL

448

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

TEMPLE ISD

BELL

8,752

MET STANDARD

31

10

14 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TENAHA ISD

SHELBY

572

MET STANDARD

84

33

64 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

BREWSTER

97

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

68

59

66 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

TEKOA ACADEMY OF ACCELERATED STUDIES (C)

TERLINGUA CSD TERRELL COUNTY ISD

TERRELL

116

MET STANDARD

15

72

39 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TERRELL ISD

KAUFMAN

4,218

MET STANDARD

30

37

32 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

TEXARKANA ISD

BOWIE

7,121

MET STANDARD

54

50

53 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

TEXAS CITY ISD

GALVESTON

5,878

MET STANDARD

21

21

17 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

TARRANT

296

MET STANDARD

60

54

59 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

TRAVIS

218

MET STANDARD

73

43

61 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

TOM GREEN

960

MET STANDARD

7

7

6 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

HAYS

138

MET STANDARD

92

66

87 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

MONTGOMERY

427

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

TEXHOMA ISD

SHERMAN

372

MET STANDARD

1

17

1 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

TEXLINE ISD

DALLAM

145

MET STANDARD

32

62

46 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

THE EAST AUSTIN COLLEGE PREP ACADEMY (C)

TRAVIS

717

MET STANDARD

13

71

36 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

THE EDUCATION CENTER (C)

DENTON

646

MET STANDARD

7

76

31 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

THE RHODES SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

724

MET STANDARD

14

49

25 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

THE VARNETT PUBLIC SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

1,595

MET STANDARD

64

4

18 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

THORNDALE ISD

MILAM

576

MET STANDARD

34

7

12 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

WILLIAMSON

626

MET STANDARD

19

42

26 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

LIVE OAK

631

MET STANDARD

47

9

18 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

ERATH

53

MET STANDARD

38

36

35 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

THROCKMORTON

203

MET STANDARD

35

58

47 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

MATAGORDA

779

MET STANDARD

38

79

61 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

SHELBY

644

MET STANDARD

63

25

43 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

TIOGA ISD

GRAYSON

270

MET STANDARD

91

89

94 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

TOLAR ISD

HOOD

651

MET STANDARD

57

26

39 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

TEXAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS (C) TEXAS EMPOWERMENT ACADEMY (C) TEXAS LEADERSHIP CHARTER ACADEMY (C) TEXAS PREPARATORY SCHOOL (C) TEXAS SERENITY ACADEMY (C)

THRALL ISD THREE RIVERS ISD THREE WAY ISD THROCKMORTON ISD TIDEHAVEN ISD TIMPSON ISD

TOM BEAN ISD

GRAYSON

753

MET STANDARD

58

45

53 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

TOMBALL ISD

HARRIS

11,723

MET STANDARD

93

91

95 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

TORNILLO ISD

EL PASO

1,350

MET STANDARD

91

16

57 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

BELL

66

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

**

**

**

+

AVERAGE

=

**

TARRANT

349

MET STANDARD

58

62

62 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

TRANSFORMATIVE CHARTER ACADEMY (C) TREETOPS SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL (C) TRENT ISD

TAYLOR

171

MET STANDARD

55

83

73 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

TRENTON ISD

FANNIN

549

MET STANDARD

28

40

33 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

TRINIDAD ISD

HENDERSON

164

MET STANDARD

2

61

12 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

TRINITY BASIN PREPARATORY (C)

DALLAS

1,622

MET STANDARD

82

53

72 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

TRINITY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

COMAL

137

NOT RATED

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

30

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

TRINITY ISD

TRINITY

1,260

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

21

5

7 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

TROUP ISD

SMITH

1,124

MET STANDARD

59

53

57 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

TROY ISD

BELL

1,380

MET STANDARD

40

54

47 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

TULIA ISD

SWISHER

1,110

MET STANDARD

70

70

74 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

TULOSO-MIDWAY ISD

NUECES

3,713

MET STANDARD

60

43

53 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

TURKEY-QUITAQUE ISD

HALL

213

MET STANDARD

95

66

90 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

HARRIS

550

MET STANDARD

3

36

10 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

TWO DIMENSIONS PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C) TYLER ISD

SMITH

18,216

MET STANDARD

45

56

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

UME PREPARATORY ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

337

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

UNION GROVE ISD

UPSHUR

755

MET STANDARD

9

51

22 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

UNION HILL ISD

UPSHUR

284

MET STANDARD

66

85

81 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WEBB

42,753

MET STANDARD

64

17

36 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

UNIVERSAL ACADEMY (C)

DALLAS

1,469

MET STANDARD

74

86

85 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

133

MET STANDARD

34

83

62 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

298

MET STANDARD

72

55

66 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

80

48

69 

+

**

=

**

UNITED ISD

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TRAVIS

770

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

UT TYLER INNOVATION ACADEMY (C)

SMITH

278

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

UTOPIA ISD

UVALDE

214

MET STANDARD

52

72

64 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

UVALDE

4,843

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

24

7

10 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯®®®®

JEFF DAVIS

41

MET STANDARD

79

89

89 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

VALLEY MILLS ISD

BOSQUE

628

MET STANDARD

31

52

40 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

VALLEY VIEW ISD

HIDALGO

4,760

MET STANDARD

98

94

98 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

UVALDE CISD VALENTINE ISD

VALLEY VIEW ISD

COOKE

697

MET STANDARD

71

94

90 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

VAN ALSTYNE ISD

GRAYSON

1,294

MET STANDARD

60

94

86 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

VAN ISD

VAN ZANDT

2,245

MET STANDARD

53

18

30 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

VAN VLECK ISD

MATAGORDA

920

MET STANDARD

35

50

41 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

VANGUARD ACADEMY (C)

HIDALGO

1,695

MET STANDARD

83

99

98 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

VEGA ISD

OLDHAM

343

MET STANDARD

68

32

51 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

VENUS ISD

JOHNSON

1,891

MET STANDARD

68

11

33 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

VERIBEST ISD

TOM GREEN

251

MET STANDARD

55

59

59 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

VERNON ISD

WILBARGER

2,164

MET STANDARD

64

26

45 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

7

6

5 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

VICTORIA ISD

VICTORIA

14,460

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

VICTORY PREP

HARRIS

658

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

VIDOR ISD

ORANGE

4,988

MET STANDARD

20

7

8 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

VISTA DEL FUTURO CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

EL PASO

182

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

VYSEHRAD ISD

LAVACA

111

MET STANDARD

78

55

71 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

WACO CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

MCLENNAN

263

MET STANDARD

3

4

2 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WACO ISD

MCLENNAN

15,159

MET STANDARD

18

14

11 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

31

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

WAELDER ISD

GONZALES

304

MET STANDARD

14

28

15 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

WALCOTT ISD

DEAF SMITH

139

MET STANDARD

86

68

84 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

WALIPP-TSU PREPARATORY ACADEMY

HARRIS

229

MET STANDARD

**

**

**

+

**

=

**

TOM GREEN

1,040

MET STANDARD

95

94

96 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

WALLER ISD

WALLER

5,705

MET STANDARD

92

83

92 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

WALNUT BEND ISD

COOKE

90

MET STANDARD

49

63

57 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

BOSQUE

199

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

27

7

11 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

WARREN ISD

TYLER

1,228

MET STANDARD

50

8

19 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

WASKOM ISD

HARRISON

865

MET STANDARD

30

6

10 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

WATER VALLEY ISD

TOM GREEN

302

MET STANDARD

78

74

80 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

12

43

20 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WALL ISD

WALNUT SPRINGS ISD

WAXAHACHIE FAITH FAMILY ACADEMY (C)

ELLIS

450

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

WAXAHACHIE ISD

ELLIS

7,629

MET STANDARD

54

41

48 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WEATHERFORD ISD

PARKER

7,617

MET STANDARD

46

57

51 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WEBB CISD

WEBB

350

MET STANDARD

13

69

35 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WEIMAR ISD

COLORADO

566

MET STANDARD

74

92

89 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

COLLINGSWORTH

585

MET STANDARD

57

24

38 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

TERRY

224

MET STANDARD

28

92

66 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

WELLINGTON ISD WELLMAN-UNION CISD WELLS ISD

CHEROKEE

318

MET STANDARD

59

27

42 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

WESLACO ISD

HIDALGO

17,830

MET STANDARD

79

9

36 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WEST HARDIN COUNTY CISD

HARDIN

584

MET STANDARD

3

7

3 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

WEST HOUSTON CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

HARRIS

320

MET STANDARD

8

67

28 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

MCLENNAN

1,440

NOT RATED

16

21

14 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WEST ORANGE-COVE CISD

ORANGE

2,349

MET STANDARD

5

20

8 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

WEST OSO ISD

NUECES

2,030

MET STANDARD

13

23

13 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WEST RUSK ISD

RUSK

998

MET STANDARD

14

20

12 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯®®®

WEST SABINE ISD

SABINE

649

MET STANDARD

22

16

14 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

WESTBROOK ISD

MITCHELL

219

MET STANDARD

77

62

73 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

WESTHOFF ISD

DEWITT

69

MET STANDARD

17

52

30 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WESTLAKE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (C)

TARRANT

670

MET STANDARD

69

97

93 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WEST ISD

WESTPHALIA ISD

FALLS

155

MET STANDARD

92

47

80 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

WESTWOOD ISD

ANDERSON

1,619

MET STANDARD

72

44

61 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

WHARTON ISD

WHARTON

2,132

MET STANDARD

47

24

33 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WHEELER ISD

WHEELER

466

MET STANDARD

24

33

25 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WHITE DEER ISD

CARSON

389

MET STANDARD

51

41

46 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

GREGG

1,436

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

83

80

86 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

WHITE SETTLEMENT ISD

TARRANT

6,514

MET STANDARD

35

44

38 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WHITEFACE CISD

COCHRAN

356

MET STANDARD

59

73

69 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

WHITEHOUSE ISD

SMITH

4,597

MET STANDARD

89

56

80 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

74

51 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

WHITE OAK ISD

WHITESBORO ISD

GRAYSON

1,507

MET STANDARD

28

FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; *The districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

32

60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■ 

40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

LESS THAN 20 ■ 

** Insufficient data

2013

DISTRICT LISTINGS

DISTRICT NAME

COUNTY

FAST

Financial Allocation Study for Texas.

2013 TEA MATH READING ENROLL- ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESS PROGRESS MENT RATING PERCENTILE PERCENTILE

FAST COMPONENTS COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE

+

SPENDING INDEX

= *FAST RATING

WHITEWRIGHT ISD

GRAYSON

777

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

WHITHARRAL ISD

HOCKLEY

193

MET STANDARD

70

85

83 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

HILL

1,537

MET STANDARD

22

48

31 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

WICHITA FALLS ISD

WICHITA

14,639

MET STANDARD

68

50

62 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

WILDORADO ISD

OLDHAM

102

MET STANDARD

94

90

95 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

WILLIAMS PREPARATORY (C)

DALLAS

1,563

MET STANDARD

99

98

99 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

MONTGOMERY

6,536

MET STANDARD

60

9

24 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

VAN ZANDT

2,524

MET STANDARD

20

44

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

WHITNEY ISD

WILLIS ISD WILLS POINT ISD

58

39

50 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

WILSON ISD

LYNN

138

MET STANDARD

10

70

34 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WIMBERLEY ISD

HAYS

2,044

MET STANDARD

91

90

94 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯¯®

WINDTHORST ISD

ARCHER

476

MET STANDARD

91

35

72 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

TITUS

134

MET STANDARD

6

69

27 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯°®®

**

**

**

+

VERY LOW

=

**

WINFIELD ISD WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS (C)

DALLAS

1,506

MET ALTERNATIVE STANDARD

WINK-LOVING ISD

WINKLER

400

MET STANDARD

85

20

55 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

WINNSBORO ISD

WOOD

1,490

MET STANDARD

65

85

80 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

WINONA ISD

SMITH

1,019

MET STANDARD

79

75

82 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WINTERS ISD

RUNNELS

625

MET STANDARD

51

43

47 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯®®

WODEN ISD

NACOGDOCHES

806

MET STANDARD

91

90

94 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

WOLFE CITY ISD

HUNT

612

MET STANDARD

57

81

73 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯¯®

WOODSBORO ISD

REFUGIO

515

MET STANDARD

10

37

17 

+

HIGH

=

¯°®®®

WOODSON ISD

THROCKMORTON

109

MET STANDARD

76

81

84 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

WOODVILLE ISD

TYLER

1,315

MET STANDARD

54

87

77 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯®®

WORTHAM ISD

FREESTONE

486

MET STANDARD

25

31

24 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯®®

WYLIE ISD

COLLIN

13,361

MET STANDARD

74

49

65 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

WYLIE ISD

TAYLOR

3,649

MET STANDARD

96

71

92 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

YANTIS ISD

WOOD

380

MET STANDARD

7

96

55 

+

LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

YES PREPARATORY PUBLIC SCHOOLS (C)

HARRIS

5,934

MET STANDARD

99

99

99 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯¯°®

YOAKUM ISD

DEWITT

1,613

MET STANDARD

56

13

28 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯°®

YORKTOWN ISD

DEWITT

525

MET STANDARD

10

10

7 

+

LOW

=

¯¯°®®

YSLETA ISD

EL PASO

43,512

MET STANDARD

66

78

75 

+

VERY HIGH

=

¯¯°®®

ZAPATA COUNTY ISD

ZAPATA

3,585

MET STANDARD

60

8

24 

+

HIGH

=

¯¯®®®

ZAVALLA ISD

ANGELINA

441

MET STANDARD

82

65

79 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯°

ZEPHYR ISD

BROWN

214

MET STANDARD

50

76

65 

+

AVERAGE

=

¯¯¯°®

481

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

89

77

88 

+

VERY LOW

=

¯¯¯¯¯

ZOE LEARNING ACADEMY (C)

HARRIS

*

** Insufficient data

The FAST Rating is an average of the composite academic progress percentile and the spending index; districts with the lowest spending relative to similar districts and the most academic progress receive the highest scores. COMPOSITE PROGRESS PERCENTILE: 80-99 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-79 ■ ■ ■ ■  40-59 ■ ■ ■   20-39■ ■  LESS THAN 20 ■ 

Susan Combs Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts

33

2013 FAST Ratings.pdf

Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. 2013 FAST Ratings.pdf. 2013 FAST Ratings.pdf. Open.

2MB Sizes 1 Downloads 27 Views

Recommend Documents

fast furious 2001 2013.pdf
Page 1. Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... fast furious 2001 2013.pdf. fast furious 2001 2013.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Fast Construction of a Word↔Number Index for Large ... - raslan 2013
also for many other applications, e.g. building data for morphological analysers ... database management system must be in place – and so is this the case of the.

Fast Construction of a WordNumber Index for Large Data - raslan 2013
Construction of a Word↔Number Index. 7. 12. 2013. 1 / 7. Page 2. Introduction. • Inspiration: Aleš Horák @ 1st NLP Centre seminar :-) • (but we still did not compare Manatee and some sql DB). • Problem: indexes for large text corpora (billi

Fast Averaging
MapReduce. Conclusions. Motivation. Large data center (a cluster of computers). Used by Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Facebook, ... What functions ... 15/17. Introduction. Algorithm. MapReduce. Conclusions. Why it works. Estimated Frequency. Facebook. F

Fast Averaging
Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. {bodas, devavrat}@mit.edu. Abstract—We are interested in the following question: given n numbers x1,...,xn, what sorts of approximation of average xave = 1 n (x

(>
(-eBook-) The Fast Forward MBA in Project. Management (Fast Forward MBA Series). BOOKS BY ERIC VERZUH. An book is definitely an electronic variation of ...