Sullivan High School- Creating a Culture of Excellence Building School Improvement Plan
2016-2017 0|Page
CSIP Goal 1 – Student Performance BSIP Goal 1 - To improve the academic performance of ALL students at Sullivan High School while preparing for college and/or career. MSIP 5 Standard 1- Academic Achievement The MPI number is used to determine academic achievement in those courses. The figures below represent the percentage of students scoring in the top two levels of the respective EOC Assessments.
Objective 1 - SHS will experience growth over the 2015 scores of the students who take the End of Course Assessments during the 2016-2017 school year. Objectives 1-3 from the 2015-2016 BSIP were based upon achieving 10% growth in each of the EOC assessments given. The breakdown of assessments is listed below. We met the goal for Government. The others were not met. 2016-17 scores: English II – 85.1% - up 1.1% Biology – 69% - down 21% Algebra I – 50% - down 5.2% Algebra II – 77.5% - down 6.5% Government – 73.4% - up 23%
Goal for 16-17 is to maintain 85% Goal for 16-17 is to achieve 85% Goal for 16-17 is to achieve 60% Goal for 16-17 is to achieve 85% Goal for 16-17 is to achieve 75%
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Metric
2014
2015
2016
1. Academic Achievement % Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score % Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score % Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score
English Language Arts Status
16.0
16.0
399.5
2020 Target
Progress
12.0
0.0
-2.6
Floor
16.0
16.0
100.0%
16.0
16.0
100.0%
Total Points Earned - 2016 (Status + Progress or Growth) Total Points Earned - 2015
73.5%
402.7
76.1
Prior 2 Yr NCE Avg = 73.3
84.0%
397.5
70.5
86.1%
398.2
71
Current 2 Yr NCE Avg = 70.7
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current NCE and Year 2 NCE) - Average(Year 2 NCE and Year 3 NCE)
1|Page
2014
2015
2016
% Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score % Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score % Prof or Adv MPI NCE Score Mathematics Status
16.0
9.0
345.6
Approaching
Progress
12.0
3.0
1.1
Approaching
16.0
12.0
75.0%
16.0
16.0
100.0%
Total Points Earned - 2016 (Status + Progress or Growth) Total Points Earned - 2015
59.1%
352.3
51.9
63.3%
347.3
62.7
Prior 2 Yr NCE Avg = 57.3
58.6%
337.1
54.1
Current 2 Yr NCE Avg = 58.4
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current NCE and Year 2 NCE) - Average(Year 2 NCE and Year 3 NCE)
2014
2015
2016
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
68.7%
379.7
90.3%
413.7
68.3%
376.9
Science Status
16.0
16.0
390.1
2020 Target
Progress
12.0
0.0
-1.4
Floor
16.0
16.0
Prior 2 Yr MPI Avg = 396.7
Current 2 Yr MPI Avg = 395.3
Total Points Earned 3 Yr Progress = Average(Current MPI and Year 2 MPI) - Average(Year 2 MPI and Year 3 MPI)
(Status + Progress) 100.0%
2014
2015
2016
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
58.0%
355.4
52.0%
344.6
73.6%
386.2
Social Studies - ## Status
8.0
6.0
362.1
On Track
Progress
6.0
6.0
15.4
Exceeding
8.0
8.0
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
Prior 2 Yr MPI Avg = 350.0
Current 2 Yr MPI Avg = 365.4
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current MPI and Year 2 MPI) - Average(Year 2 MPI and Year 3 MPI) 100.0%
2|Page
3|Page
MSIP 5 Standard 2 – Subgroup Achievement SHS has subgroups in both IEP and Free/Reduced populations. The figures below represent the percentage of students scoring in the top two levels of the End of Course Assessments in each of subject areas listed below. Subgroup Achievement
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Metric
English Language Arts Status
4.0
3.0
373.0
On Track
Progress
3.0
1.0
0.8
Approaching
Total Points Earned 2016 (Status + Progress or Growth) Total Points Earned - 2015
2014 % Prof or Adv
MPI
60.9%
373.9
2015 NCE Score % Prof or Adv
75.2
72.7%
NCE Score
% Prof or Adv
MPI
NCE Score
365.5
70.8
73.4%
379.7
76.7
Current 2 Yr NCE Avg = 73.8
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current NCE and Year 2 NCE) - Average(Year 2 NCE and Year 3 NCE) 4.0
4.0
100.0%
4.0
4.0
100.0%
Mathematics Status
4.0
2.0
305.3
Approaching
Progress
3.0
0.0
-1.0
Floor
Total Points Earned 2016
Total Points Earned - 2015
MPI
Prior 2 Yr NCE Avg = 73.0
2014
(Status + Progress or Growth)
2016
% Prof or Adv
MPI
49.0%
325.5
2015 NCE Score % Prof or Adv
47.8
50.7%
2016
MPI
NCE Score
% Prof or Adv
MPI
NCE Score
298.5
55.7
46.0%
292.0
45.8
Prior 2 Yr NCE Avg = 51.8
Current 2 Yr NCE Avg = 50.8
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current NCE and Year 2 NCE) - Average(Year 2 NCE and Year 3 NCE) 4.0
2.0
50.0%
4.0
4.0
100.0% 2014
Science Status
4.0
4.0
370.3
2020 Target
Progress
3.0
0.0
-0.8
Floor
2015
2016
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
53.2%
354.4
86.0%
403.5
56.3%
352.9
Prior 2 Yr MPI Avg = 379.0
Current 2 Yr MPI Avg = 378.2
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current MPI and Year 2 MPI) - Average(Year 2 MPI and Year 3 MPI)
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress) 4.0
4.0
100.0%
4|Page
2014 Social Studies - ## Status
2.0
1.0
314.1
Approaching
Progress
1.5
1.5
11.8
Exceeding
2.0
2.0
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
2015
2016
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
% Prof or Adv
MPI
44.8%
310.3
37.9%
298.3
52.7%
333.8
Prior 2 Yr MPI Avg = 304.3
Current 2 Yr MPI Avg = 316.1
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current MPI and Year 2 MPI) - Average(Year 2 MPI and Year 3 MPI) 100.0%
Objective 1 - SHS will experience growth over the 2016 scores of ALL students who take the End of Course Assessments during the 2016-2017 school year.
5|Page
To improve upon the data shown previously, the following strategies are planned: Person(s) Responsible Math teachers
Strategy
Evaluation
Professional Development/Resources Needed
Require students to orally defend a process that they used to solve a math problem at least weekly and explain a complex process in writing at least once each unit Have students construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others in solving math problems Implementing SLO’s in their classrooms to monitor student learning and adjust as needed Use STAR data to track progress of students in Math & Reading – set goals and use interventions to achieve Teachers are integrating more critical thinking skills in their lessons to increase student engagement as reflected in their growth plans.
Teacher reflection EOC Assessments
Teachers, Instructional Coach, Principals
All teachers, except Math, will require students to write a “Perfect Paragraph” at least once each unit
EOC Scores, ACT Writing
Evidence Based Writing PD
Teachers, Instructional Coach, Principals
All teachers will have students annotate a non-fiction text and use text dependent questions to read closely in each unit Math teachers continue to work on curriculum recommendations including more visual representations, hands on activities, & higher level/problem solving strategies All teachers will adhere to curriculum maps to pace out implementation of approved objectives, assessments, & instructional practices ELA teachers are in phase II of their curriculum and are utilizing new resources this year
EOC Scores, ACT
Close Reading/Text Dependent PD
EOC Scores
Instructional Strategies
EOC Scores
Curriculum training
EOC Assessment ELA curriculum
Curriculum training
Math teachers All Teachers Instructional Coaches & Freshmen Math & ELA teachers Teachers, Instructional Coaches, Principals
Math teachers, Instructional Coach, Asst. Supt of CIA, Principals Teachers, Instructional Coaches, Principals, Asst. Supt of CIA ELA Teachers, principals,
SLO’s STAR data Critical Thinking through Questioning PD
6|Page
Core Teachers EOC Teachers, Instructional Coaches
All core teachers will meet weekly as a department to focus on data, grading practices, common assessments, pacing guides, etc. EOC teachers give practice EOC assessments throughout the year to gauge what areas need improvement
EOC Assessment
7|Page
MSIP 5 Standard 3 – College & Career Readiness There are 6 indicators for Standard 3 Standard 3 – CCR Indicators 1-3 Indicators 1-3 are grouped together in the data charts. Schools receive points for individual graduating seniors’ scores on assessments including ACT, SAT, COMPASS, and the ASVAB. Schools receive a full point for each student scoring at or above the national average and receive partial points for those scoring below. Schools receive 0 points for any student not taking one of the assessments. Schools earn 1.25 points for students scoring a 26 or above on the ACT, 1190-1600 on the SAT, or 88-99 on the ASVAB. Our objective from 2015-2016 was to have 70.1% of our graduates earn qualifying scores on the ACT, SAT, COMPASS, or ASVAB. That objective was MET.
Objective 1 – Of the graduates of 2017, 71.1% will earn qualifying scores on the ACT, SAT, COMPASS, or ASVAB. 3. College and Career Ready
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Pct.
2014 % at or Abv # at or Abv State State Standard Standard
*1-3 CCR Assessments Status
10.0
7.5
70.2% On Track
Progress
7.5
4.0
6.5% On Track
10.0
10.0
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
62.2%
105.75
2015
Number of Graduates
170
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 67.7%
% at or Abv # at or Abv State State Standard Standard 73.1%
125.75
2016 Number of Graduates
172
% at or Abv # at or Abv State State Standard Standard 75.2%
99.25
Number of Graduates
132
Current 2 Yr Avg = 74.2%
For details on progress please reference the MSIP5 Comprehensive Guide to Missouri School Improvement Program. 100.0%
8|Page
Standard 3 – CCR Indicator 4 Indicator 4 is the percentage of graduates who earned a qualifying score on an AP exam, TSA, and/or received a B or above in a college dual credit course taken while in high school. The number of graduates earning that qualifying score or grade is divided by the number of graduates and then multiplied by 100. Students earning a qualifying score on an AP exam earn 1.25 points while all other qualifiers score 1 point. Our objective from 2015-2016 was to have 54.9% of our graduates earn a qualifying score on an AP exam, TSA, or earn a successful grade in a college dual credit course taken while in high school. That objective was MET.
Objective 2 – Of the graduates of 2017, 54.9%% will earn a qualifying score on an AP exam, TSA, or earn a successful grade in a college dual credit course taken while in high school.
9|Page
3. College and Career Ready
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Pct.
2014
*4 Advanced Placement Status
10.0 10.0
60.1%
2020 Target
Progress
7.5
2.0
2.7%
Approaching
CTE Expansion *
0.0
0.0
Total Points Earned (Status + progress)
2015
% at or Abv State Standard
# at or Abv State Standard
Number of Graduates
61.8%
105.00
170
% at or Abv # at or Abv State State Standard Standard 51.3%
88.25
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 56.6%
2016
Number of Graduates 172
% at or Abv # at or Abv State State Standard Standard 67.2%
88.75
Number of Graduates 132
Current 2 Yr Avg = 59.3%
For details on progress please reference the MSIP5 Comprehensive Guide to Missouri School Improvement Program. 10.0 10.0 100.0%
To improve upon the data shown previously, the following strategies are planned: Person(s) Responsible Teachers, counselors, & principals Math, ELA, Science, & Social Studies teachers & principals Counselors & principals Counselors, principals, and teachers Career Ed Teachers Career Ed Teachers Career Ed Teachers & Career Ed Instructional Coach
Strategy Offer AP courses with study sessions to prepare for the AP exams Teachers will embed ACT strategies into their curriculum. Seniors receive recognition and incentives for scoring at or above a 22 on the ACT. Students will participate in Assessment Day each fall – taking part in the ACT Aspire, Practice ACT, or ASVAB Promote to Career Ed students and parents the potential of earning an industry certificate with TSA score and the benefits Career Ed department meets regularly to ensure students are placed correctly according to their career path Offer pre & post assessments for the TSA/IRC Assessment
Evaluation AP Exam results Curriculum Review ACT results 22 Crew ACT results ACT results
Professional Development Needed AP Training for teachers ACT training for newer staff Access to and information on ACT
CCR Indicator 4
10 | P a g e
Standard 3 - CCR Indicators 5-6 Indicators 5-6 include post-secondary placement of graduates. The score is determined by dividing the number of graduates who attend post-secondary education or training, are in the military, or who completed a Career Education program and are placed in an occupation directly related to their training by the number of graduates, and then multiply by 100. Schools receive one point for each student who meets the above criteria. Schools earn 0 points for students not meeting the above criteria. (Some of this year’s data was entered incorrectly; next year’s tables will show the corrections) Our objective from 2015-2016 was to have 85% of our graduates attend post-secondary education or training, join the military, or be placed in an occupation directly related to their career training. That objective was met. 3. College and Career Ready
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Percent
2014 % Earning # Earning Numbe % Earning Qualifying Qualifyin r of Qualifying Score g Score Grads Score
*5-6 Postsecondary Placement
Status
10.0
7.5
85.6%
On Track
Progress
7.5
2.0
1.8%
Approaching
10.0
9.5
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
2015
84.3%
129
153
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 84.5%
84.7%
2016
# Number Earning of Qualifyi Grads ng Score
144
170
% Earning Qualifying Score
87.8%
# Earning Number Qualifyin of Grads g Score
151
172
Current 2 Yr Avg = 86.3%
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current Pct and Year 2 Pct) - Average(Year 2 Pct and Year 3 Pct) 95.0%
Objective 1 – Of the graduates of 2016, 90% will be attending post-secondary education or training, in the military, or placed in an occupation directly related to their career training.
11 | P a g e
To improve upon the data shown previously, the following strategies are planned: New strategies are outlined in BOLD Person(s) Responsible Teachers, counselors, principals MCAC Advisor, Counselors, Advisors Counselors & Advisors All advisors, counselors, & principals Advisors, counselors, principals, and parents
Strategy Ensure Career Ed courses offered are in demand in the workplace Meet individually with students regarding college – offer several college visits – host college reps here for students to meet Promote Missouri Connections to all students, staff, and parents on a yearly basis. Counselors and advisors will meet with students regularly and parents annually to discuss post graduate options and interests. Expect students to take a rigorous course of study in preparation for post secondary education or training.
Evaluation
Professional Development Needed
Career Ed Completers College Placement Advisory agendas College placement Newsletters Advisory Agendas Counseling logs Advisory agendas Enrollment in advanced & career education
Connection to Guidance/course description booklet Workshop on personal plans of study and grad requirements Workshops on Guidance/course description booklet 12 | P a g e
Advisors, counselors, & principals
Students receive assistance transitioning from middle to high school and from high school to college or the work force.
Counseling logs Advisory agendas
Workshops on Guidance/course description booklet
A+ Coordinator, Advisors
Promote A+ program and its benefits to students, parents, and the community.
Advisors Counselors – MCAC counselor
All seniors will complete at least one application for college or technical school.
Newsletters College placement & number of A+ graduates Advisory agendas College placement Scholarship acquisition
Refresher on A+ Requirements and benefits Counselor led PD Eagle Time enrichment – assistance to students in filling out scholarships
Counselors
SHS will host an annual college fair.
Counselors, MCAC Advisor, FRCC Representative
Meet with FRCC students – ensure they are aware of continuing ed options via ECC and Linn State Technical College Establish Postsecondary Leadership Team to participate in MCAC training and implement plan Career Ed Teachers host Advisory Board meetings with members of the school and community to gain support Junior & Senior Career Ed students will participate in Job Shadowing
Postsecondary Leadership Team, counselors, principals Career Ed Teachers
Career Ed Teachers & Career Ed Instructional Coach
College Placement and survey results College Placement & Career Ed Completers Postsecondary placement
MCAC training
Career Ed Completers Enrollment in Career Ed classes
Partnering with the community with CTSO’s as well as Career Ed Advisory Committees SHS will host a Career Expo to promote careers in the area manufacturing and engineering
13 | P a g e
Career Ed Teachers
Career Ed teachers will host additional guest speakers to inform students of area needs in careers
Advisors, Counselors, Special Ed Teachers
Team Vocational Rehab with students who may need assistance with employment or training after high school
Advisors, Counselors, Career Ed Teachers
Continue to promote Career Ed Internships as well as the FLEX program and OJT as a means to prepare students for various careers
14 | P a g e
Standard 4 – Attendance Schools receive 1 point for each student with 90% attendance or above. That number is divided by the total number of students to determine the proportional attendance rate. Our objective for 2014-2015 was to have 90% of our students earn 90% attendance or above. That objective was not met.
Objective 1 – SHS will have 90% of its students with 90% attendance or above. 4. Attendance
Points Poss.
Points Percent Earned Earned
Pct.
2014 Pct Above 90%
Attendance
Num. Above 90%
2015 Num. Attend. Pct Above 90%
Num. Above 90%
2016 Num. Attend.
Pct Above 90%
Num. Above
Num. Attend.
90% Status
10.0
6.0
84.6%
Approaching 83.4%
Progress
7.5
2.0
1.1%
Approaching
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
585.6831
702.652
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 84.1%
84.8%
572.9450
675.9141
85.5%
571.2537
668.3503
Current 2 Yr Avg = 85.2%
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current Pct and Year 2 Pct) - Average(Year 2 Pct and Year 3 Pct) 10.0
8.0
80.0%
15 | P a g e
Our goal is to increase to 90%. To improve upon the data shown previously, the following strategies are planned: Person(s) Responsible Assistant Principals
Strategy Students earning 97% attendance at semester are given a “final free” pass.
Evaluation Participation in final pass incentive Attendance Rate
Assistant Principals & Attendance secretary Assistant Principal & Attendance secretary
Parent notification by e-mail for ALL absences.
Attendance Rate
Social Worker
The district Social Worker will meet with all at-risk attendance students to support them. Student contract/improvement plan will be created with students not following attendance policy during the previous semester 90% at 90% Attendance Incentive Program to reward advisories with the highest percentage of attendance in each grade level “Lifesaver” Mentoring Program implementation – focuses on students who had 80-89% attendance – staff member mentors throughout the year on attendance Require students to have, and maintain, 90% attendance prior to participating in all off campus options (AG COE, Marketing Intern, Flex Option, OJT)
Assistant Principal Counselors & Assistant Principals Lifesavers & Counselors Counselors, Principals, Teachers involved in those programs
Attendance step letters will be mailed home to students on Increase in attendance of those a weekly basis. receiving letters. Record of SBSW visits and student attendance progress Attendance rate Attendance rate Attendance rate Attendance rate
16 | P a g e
Standard 5 – Graduation Rate DESE measures both 4-year & 5-year graduation rates and counts the better score for the school. Our goal from the 2015-16 BSIP was 95%. Our best rate was 94.5%. That objective was NOT MET. The 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate is the number of students who graduate in four years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who form the adjusted cohort for the graduating class. From the beginning of 9th grade, students who are entering that grade for the first time form a cohort that is subsequently “adjusted” by adding any students who transfer into the cohort later during the 9th grade and the next three years and subtracting any students who transfer out. The 5-year adjusted cohort graduation rate is calculated the same as the four year with the exception that it includes both four and five year graduates in the fifth-year cohort. DESE will use the better graduation rate of the two.
Objective 1 – Of the cohort formed with the SHS Class of 2017, 93% will graduate in May of 2017. 5. Graduation Rate
Points Poss.
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Pct.
2014
30.0
30.0
92.4%
2020 Target
Progress
22.5
0.0
0.3%
Floor
4-Yr Grads
4-Yr Adj. Cohort
4-Yr Rate
4-Yr Grads
4-Yr Adj. Cohort
4-Yr Rate
4-Yr Grads
4-Yr Adj. Cohort
92.3%
167
181
91.9%
170
185
92.9%
131
141
30.0
30.0
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 92.1%
Current 2 Yr Avg = 92.4%
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current Pct and Year 2 Pct) - Average(Year 2 Pct and Year 3 Pct)
Points Poss.
Points Earned
100.0%
Percent Earned
Pct.
2014
Five-Year Graduation Rate Status
30.0
30.0
95.5%
2020 Target
Progress
22.5
0.0
-1.8%
Floor
30.0
30.0
Total Points Earned (Status + Progress)
2016
4-Yr Rate
Four-Year Graduation Rate Status
2015
2015
2016
5-Yr Rate
5-Yr Grads
5-Yr Adj. Cohort
5-Yr Rate
5-Yr Grads
5-Yr Adj. Cohort
5-Yr Rate
5-Yr Grads
5-Yr Adj. Cohort
98.1%
154
157
93.8%
167
178
94.5%
173
183
Prior 2 Yr Avg = 96.0%
Current 2 Yr Avg = 94.2%
3 Yr Progress = Average(Current Pct and Year 2 Pct) - Average(Year 2 Pct and Year 3 Pct) 100.0%
17 | P a g e
Our goal is to maintain this graduation rate. To that end, the following strategies will be continued: Person(s) Responsible SAC Director, counselors, & principals
Counselors, credit recovery teacher & principal SAC Director, counselors, & administrators Advisors, counselors, & principals
Strategy Missouri Options Program, located at the Sullivan Academic Center, continues to help students who would normally drop out of school stay in school and graduate with a diploma. Credit Recovery is offered to students in order to recover credits lost. Students meeting the guidelines will be placed in alternative school. All advisors check on their advisees’ grades and meet with their students to discuss academic achievement.
Evaluation Enrollment in Missouri Options Persistence to graduation Participation in credit recovery Persistence to graduation Persistence to graduation Attendance Advisory logs/agendas Six-week grades Persistence to graduation
Professional Development Needed Missouri Options training
Credit recovery training
Counselor led pd 18 | P a g e
Link Crew members, Link Crew coordinators, principals
Freshmen Transition Committee Sophomore SAT Committee
Special Education Teachers, Special Ed Director, Principals Career Ed Teachers, Special Ed Teachers, Counselors, Principals Freshmen Transition Team, Principals, Counselors
All freshmen will have positive contact with an upperclassman throughout their freshmen year. These link leaders are tutoring freshmen who are failing classes. Freshmen Transition evaluates academic and behavior needs of freshmen and addresses them as needed Sophomore Sustainability evaluates academic and behavior needs of sophomores and addresses them as needed Special Education Case managers will create meaningful transition plans for their students Teachers & counselors will assist students in utilizing the various internship options available – Marketing Internship, AG COE, OJT, Flex Summer Bridge program will be offered to incoming at-risk freshmen
Student survey Persistence to graduation
Link Leader training by Link Crew Coordinators
Graduation Rate Freshmen Grades & Attendance Rates Graduation Rate Sophomore Grades & Attendance Rates IEP Graduation Rate
Transition planning
Graduation Rate, Career Ed Completers Graduation Rate, Freshmen Grades
19 | P a g e
