WWW.LIVELAW.IN SLP(C) No.23091-23092/17
1
O U T ITEM NO.113
T O D A Y
COURT NO.1 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)
SECTION IX I N D I A Nos.23091-23092/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2017 in WP No. 9508/2017 01-09-2017 in PIL No.24110/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Petitioner(s) VERSUS
AJAY MARATHE & ANR.
Respondent(s)
(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the judgment and permission to file lengthy list of dates)
impugned
Date : 04-09-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Ms.
Tushar Mehta, ASG Rajat Nair, Adv. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Saurabh Shamshery, Adv. Kasturi Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Dr. Mr. Mr. for
Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. Ramesh B. Deshpande, Adv. Ambhay Anil Anturkar, Adv. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, Adv. Abhay Anturkar and Associates
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2017.09.04 18:44:16 IST Reason:
Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sahil Monga, Adv. Mr. Anupam Prakash, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
WWW.LIVELAW.IN SLP(C) No.23091-23092/17
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. As Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, learned counsel has entered appearance
on
behalf
of
Mr.
Ajay
Marathe,
the
respondent
No.1, no further notice need be issued to him. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao
Katneshwarkar,
learned
counsel
has
entered
appearance on behalf of the State of Maharashtra. Mr. assisted
by
C.U. Mr.
Singh,
Sahil
learned
Monga,
senior
learned
counsel
counsel
has
being entered
appearance on behalf of the intervenor who was heard in the High Court.
Hence, no further notice need be issued. As
far
as the other respondents are concerned, issue notice fixing a returnable date within two weeks.
Dasti, in addition, is
permitted. As an interim measure, it is directed that there shall
be
stay
of
the
operation
of
the
order
dated
1st September, 2017, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Public Interest Litigation (Stamp) No.24110 of 2017 and
Writ Petition No.9508 of 2017.
As we have stayed the
operation of the impugned order, we are absolutely certain that the High Court shall not pass any further interim order in this regard. Let the matter be listed on 22nd September, 2017.
(Chetan Kumar) Court Master
(Shakti Prakash Sharma) Assistant Registrar
