WWW.LIVELAW.IN ITEM NO.70+11

COURT NO.1 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SECTION XI

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)

I N D I A No(s).

30336/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-09-2016 in MBN No. 20575/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) AKSHITA SINGH

Petitioner(s) VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Respondent(s)

(TAGGED MATTER OF THIS ITEM I.E. W.P.(C)NO.267/2017 MAY BE SHOWN AGAINST THIS ITEM) WITH W.P.(C) No. 267/2017 (X) I.A. No. 79074 and 79067/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 267/2017 (X) (FOR EX-PARTE STAY FOR impleading party ON FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION and impleading party and APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON LIST THE MATTER ALONGWITH ALL THE I.AS.) I.A. Nos.78432 and 78433/2017 in MA 660/2017 in WP (C) No.76/2017 I.A. Nos.79061, 79065, 79071 and 79073/2017 in WP (C) No.76/2017. Date : 28-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

For Petitioner(s) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA Date: 2017.08.28 18:49:13 IST Reason:

Mr. Yogesh Raavi, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR Dr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.

Vinod K. Tewari, Adv. D.N. Dubey, Adv. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. Umesh Dubey, Adv. Vivek Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR

WWW.LIVELAW.IN 2 For Respondent(s)

Mr. Fali S. Nariman, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Piyush Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Adv. Mrs. C. Antony, Adv. Mr. S.C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mrityunjai Singh, Adv. Ms. Swati Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr.

Ranjit Kumar, SG Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Adv. Binu Tamta, Adv. P.K. Mullick, Adv G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. Mr. Ms. Ms.

Mukul Rohatgi, Mahesh Thakur, Rarah Fathima, Vipasha Singh,

Sr. Adv. Adv. Adv. Adv.

Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Surbhi Mehta, AOR Mr. A. Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Ms. Mr. Mr.

Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Adv. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Abhishek Bharti, Adv. Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Adv. Pratiksha Mishra, Adv. Arunava Mukherjee, Adv. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR

Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR Mr. Ankit Kumar Lal, Adv.

For

Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. M/s. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR

Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. For M/s.

Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. Mullapudi Rambabu, Adv. C.V.R. Rudra Prasad, Adv. N. Eswara Rao, Adv. M. Rambabu And Co.

Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, AOR

WWW.LIVELAW.IN 3 Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.

V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv. Prasanth P., AOR Navneet Duyar, Adv. V. Vasudevan, Adv. Biju Thakappen, Adv.

Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Ms. Mr.

Pinki Anand, ASG Ajay Sharma, Adv. Rekha Pandey, Adv. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Dinesh Minocha, Adv. Rekha Pandey, adv. Snidha Mehra, Adv. Kirti Dua, Adv. G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Waquas, Adv. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Diksha Rai, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Adv. Mr. Debojit Barkakati, Adv. Mr. M. Bala Simdu, Adv. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.

Vikas Singh, Adv. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. amandeep Kaur, Adv. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Prateek Bhatia, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Learned counsel for the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length, we pass the following directions : a)

Time

for

Mop

up

round

counselling

is

extended

till

7.9.2017. b)

This extension shall only be applicable to the deemed universities and none else.

WWW.LIVELAW.IN 4 c)

Any

application

by

any

other

college

or

institution

seeking extension shall not be entertained. d)

The competent authority, i.e., Director General of Health Services shall put up the list on the website and send it by e-mail to each of the deemed university by 8.00 p.m. today itself.

e)

The

candidates

whose

names

shall

feature

in

the

list

should be NEET qualified. f)

The ratio shall remain at 1:10. At this juncture, it is urged on behalf of the deemed

universities that if need be and in order to maintain the ration of 1:10, in case of deficit in the list meant for deemed universities, the names from the larger NEET list may be

provided.

As

long

as

for

the

seats

which

have

fallen

vacant, the ratio is maintained at 1:10, we do not perceive any difficulty.

If 1:10 ratio is not sufficient, the Director

General of Health Services is granted liberty to get into the larger NEET list.

We order accordingly.

It is made clear that no extension shall be granted. The Applications, the special leave petition and the writ petition stand disposed of accordingly.

There shall be no

order as to costs.

(Gulshan Kumar Arora) Court Master

(H.S. Parasher) Assistant Registrar