STATE OF MICHIGAN WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT David Schied, Sui Juris Appellant / Crime Victim, Vs. Township of Redford Appellees / “The Accused” Criminals

WCCC: 11—12316-AV 17th District Court No. 10B020893 OI Judge Daphne Means Curtis

DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION MOTION TO DEMAND THIS COURT READ ALL PLEADINGS APPELLANT FILES WITH THIS COURT, AND ADHERE ONLY TO CONSTITUTIONALLY COMPLIANT LAW AND CASE LAW, AND MORE PARTICULARLY, THE BILL OF RIGHTS, IN ITS RULINGS __________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW Appellant, David Schied, and moves this Honorable Court, pursuant to the oaths sworn by the presiding judge and attending public officers, and their duties to the National Constitution, in any and all proceedings before this Honorable Court in this matter: 1.

To read, consider, comprehend and rule upon all motions and pleadings David

Schied files with this Court, with Court rulings based only in and supported by laws, statutes and case law in agreement with, and not in opposition or contradiction to, the federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; 2.

To honor, uphold and abide by the oaths taken by the presiding judge and

attending court officers, pursuant to the Constitution for the United States of America, Article VI, Clauses 2 and 3, and Constitutional requirements thereof; 3.

Pursuant to those oaths, to base and support all rulings in law or case law which

are Constitutionally compliant and which will not: (a) deny the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the federal Constitution; (b) deny Constitutional/unalienable Rights to American Citizens, in the instant case, David Schied; (c) violate federal and/or state Constitutionally compliant laws; (D) shield, exonerate or hold Plaintiff harmless and immune from violating

federal

or

state

laws,

federal

or

State

Constitutions,

violating

David

Schied’s

Constitutional/unalienable Rights and Rights of due process of law, wrongdoings, crimes, criminal activities, fraud, collusion, conspiracy, insurrection, sedition and anarchy. 4.

To acknowledge that the American Citizen, in the instant case, David Schied, is

Sovereign in this Nation, and that the government, this, and other Courts serve the American Citizens pursuant to: (A) limited powers delegated from the Constitution, which delegated powers are derived from the People; (B) oaths taken to uphold the Constitution; (C) the Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights; (D) powers authorized only by the Constitution or laws in full compliance therewith, specifically, the Bill of Rights, and (E) acknowledge that lack of Constitutional conformity precludes any action and voids any ruling by this Court. Wherefore, since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of this Land, to which this Court and presiding judge are sworn, Appellant David Schied, respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant this Motion, based in and supported by the federal Constitution, for the aforesaid reasons, to honor and uphold his/her Constitutional/unalienable Rights during all judicial proceedings, to read David Schied’s pleadings and rule based only in law and case law compliant with, and not in opposition or contradictory to, the Constitution. Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved David Schied, an American man P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan [48376] 248-946-4016

STATE OF MICHIGAN WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT David Schied, Sui Juris Appellant / Crime Victim, Vs. Township of Redford Appellees / “The Accused” Criminals

WCCC: 11—12316-AV 17th District Court No. 10B020893 OI Judge Daphne Means Curtis

DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION

MOTION TO CLAIM AND EXERCISE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS and REQUIRE THE PRESIDING JUDGE TO RULE UPON THIS MOTION, and ALL PUBLIC OFFICERS OF THIS COURT TO UPHOLD SAID RIGHTS __________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW Appellant, David Schied, and moves the court, pursuant to oaths sworn by the presiding judge and the attending public officers: 1.

To acknowledge and act in accordance with a United States Federal Court ruling,

to wit: “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S. 230 F2d, 486, 489; 2.

To honor, uphold and abide by the oaths taken by the presiding judge and

attending court officers, pursuant to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article VI, Clauses 2 and 3, and the Constitution of the State of Michigan, Article XI, Section One, in this matter; 3.

To provide due process of law, pursuant to the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh,

Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America, and pursuant to Article I, Sections 1, 2, 4, 14, 17 and 23 of the Constitution of the State of, and as required by the aforementioned oaths taken by the presiding judge and attending court officers, in this matter;

4.

To provide equal protection under the law, as required by the National and state

Constitutions and pursuant to the referenced oaths; 5.

To respect, protect and uphold the Rights of David Schied, an American Citizen,

in this matter, which Rights are guaranteed in the National and state Constitutions, pursuant to referenced oaths; 6.

To acknowledge and uphold the Constitution of the United States of America as

the Supreme Law of this court, in this matter, pursuant to the mandate, in Article XI, Section One, of the Constitution of the State of Michigan, that the National Constitution is the Supreme Law of Michigan; 7.

To acknowledge and so rule that any court and/or judge which denies a Citizen to

present evidence in any hearing or trial in total support of his/her position, which evidence had previously been sent to government Defendants/Appellees and is unrebutted by government Defendants/Appellees and counsel, is perjury of oath and denial of due process of law. Since neither government Defendants/Appellees nor their counsels rebut this evidence, then, there is no dispute, and since there is no dispute to the damages in claim by David Schied, there is no controversy, and since there is no controversy, the claims for damages should be GRANTED and/or this case should proceed to a jury trial; 8.

To acknowledge and so rule that this court and no other court and no judge in

Michigan has jurisdiction over or can issue a court order against an American Citizen if that court and/or judge:

(a) does not provide due process of law; (b) does not provide equal

protection under the law; (c) does not respect and uphold the Constitutional Rights of American Citizens, and in the instant action, the Rights of David Schied, an American flesh and blood man, pursuant to the Rights guaranteed in the Constitutions for the United States of America and the

State of Michigan; (d) act with sufficient force so as to deny the powers of the National and state Constitutions. Wherefore Defendant David Schied respectfully moves this court to grant this Motion for the aforesaid reasons.

Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved ________________________________ David Schied, an American man P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan [48376] 248-946-4016

STATE OF MICHIGAN WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT David Schied, Sui Juris Appellant / Crime Victim, Vs. Township of Redford Appellees / “The Accused” Criminals

WCCC: 11—12316-AV 17th District Court No. 10B020893 OI Judge Daphne Means Curtis

DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION MOTION FOR CITIZEN’S DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

COMES NOW Appellant, David Schied, an American man, non-licensed attorney litigant, the undersigned, and having been deprived of his due process rights to a counterclaim and to a jury in the lower 17th District Court, moves the court in this Appeal as follows: 1. Pursuant to the Rights secured for him/her in the Constitution of the United States of America, Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 3, and in the 6th Amendment to said Constitution; and in Article I, Section 14, of the Michigan State Constitution, David Schied hereby states his demand for trial by jury. 2. David Schied demands that the presiding judge, pursuant to his/her oath, honor and abide by said oath, uphold and support the referenced National and state Constitutions, and David Schied’s Rights secured therein, and provide due process of law, in a judicial forum, as required, by law, to honor and uphold the Constitution and David Schied’s unalienable Rights. Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved David Schied, an American man P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan [48376] 248-946-4016

STATE OF MICHIGAN WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT David Schied, Sui Juris Appellant / Crime Victim, Vs. Township of Redford Appellees / “The Accused” Criminals

WCCC: 11—12316-AV 17th District Court No. 10B020893 OI Judge Daphne Means Curtis

DEMAND FOR CRIMINAL GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 14th day of March 2012, a true original of the documents listed below were hand-delivered to the Clerk’s office for the Wayne County Circuit Court, as well as to the courtroom/clerk for Judge Daphne Curtis. Additionally, a copy of the following documents were all provided by mail to the 17th District Court and by email to the known attorneys who have “represented” the co-Defendants in their alter-ego in other cases, including the “crosscomplaint” to this instant case and the “Complaint for Writ of Mandamus” that was just recently denied and dismissed by Judge Daphne Curtis, both of which pending in the Michigan Court of Appeals and are inextricably intertwined with this instant case. 1) “Motion for Declaratory Ruling…with Statement Justifying the Lawful Basis for Multiple Rulings by Both Lower and Circuit Court Denying ‘Forma Pauperis’ Appellant the Required Transcripts of the 17th District Court Proceedings and Denying a ‘Correction of the Lower Court Record in Light of Clear Evidence of Multiple Motions Delivered to the 17th District Court on Two Separate Occasions But Never Recorded or Filed by That Lower Court’ on Case Involving Allegations of Felony ‘Deprivation of Rights’, Judicial Misconduct, A Conspiracy of Government Racketeering, Extortion, Fraud Upon the Michigan Secretary of State, and Treason”; 2) “Motion for Judge to Disqualify Herself…Based Upon Allegations and Evidence of Judicial Bias Against Pro Se Appellant, Favorable Prejudice Toward Her Government ‘Peer Group’, and Allegations and Evidence That This Judge Committed Criminal Misconduct From the Bench To ‘Aid and Abet’ Her ‘Peer Group’ of Other Judges and Law Enforcement and Executive County Officials in a ‘Conspiracy to Deprive of Rights Under Color of Law’ and Other Felony Crimes”; 3) Demand for Criminal Grand Jury Investigation; 4) “Sworn Affidavit” of David Schied, in the support of the above two motions, signed and notarized on 3/12/12; 5) “Motion to Demand This Court Read All Pleadings Appellant Files With This Court, and Adhere Only to Constitutionally Compliant Law and Case Law, and More Particularly, the Bill of Rights, In Its Rulings”; 6) “Motion to Claim and Exercise Constitutional Rights and Require the Presiding Judge to Rule Upon This Motion, and All Public Officers of This Court to Uphold Said Rights”;

7) “Motion for Citizen’s Demand for Trial by Jury”; 8) Certificate of Service Notice of Hearing on 4/13/12 at 9:00am Respectfully submitted,

All Rights Reserved David Schied, an American man P.O. Box 1378 Novi, Michigan [48376] 248-946-4016 Cc All the above was copied by email to the attorneys for the Defendants/Appellees in other inextricably intertwined cases: Michael L. Bosnic – P52659 Attorney for Appellees 710 N. Crooks Rd. Clawson, MI 48017 248-435-3509 [email protected]

Jeffrey Clark and Joseph Nimako – Attorneys for Appellees Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.L.C. 33900 Schoolcraft Rd. Livonia, MI 48150 734-261-2400 [email protected], [email protected]