An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments by Ali Almossawi

››› Get audio book for free. ‹‹‹ Original Title: An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments ISBN: ISBN13: Autor: Ali Almossawi (Goodreads Author)/Alejandro Giraldo (Illustrator) Rating: 3.2 of 5 stars (3742) counts Original Format: Hardcover, 64 pages Download Format: PDF, FB2, MOBI, MP3. Published: December 5th 2013 / by Ali Almossawi / (first published January 1st 2013) Language: English Genre(s): Nonfiction- 100 users Philosophy- 74 users Philosophy >Logic- 19 users Humor- 12 users Reference- 12 users Sequential Art >Comics- 11 users

Description: This book is aimed at newcomers to the field of logical reasoning, particularly those who, to borrow a phrase from Pascal, are so made that they understand best through visuals. I have selected a small set of common errors in reasoning and visualized them using memorable illustrations that are supplemented with lots of examples. The hope is that the reader will learn from these pages some of the most common pitfalls in arguments and be able to identify and avoid them in practice.

About Author:

Data visualization engineer at Firefox.

Other Editions:

- An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments (Hardcover)

- An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments (Kindle Edition)

-

: (ebook)

- An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments (ebook)

- An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments (Hardcover)

Books By Author:

- Bad Choices: How Algorithms Can Help You Think Smarter and Live Happier

Books In The Series: Related Books On Our Site:

- Professor Astro Cat's Frontiers of Space

- Believing Bullshit: How Not to Get Sucked into an Intellectual Black Hole

- The Lives of Sacco and Vanzetti

- Time-lapse Photography: A Complete Introduction to Shooting, Processing and Rendering Timelapse Movies with a DSLR Camera

- A Fish Named Glub

- Would You Do What They Did? - Great Christian Leaders from Our Past

- I'll Be You and You Be Me

- Journey by Starlight: A Time Traveler's Guide to Life, the Universe, and Everything

- Nietzsche, se créer liberté

- How to Become a Really Good Pain in the Ass: A Critical Thinker's Guide to Asking the Right Questions

- A History of Photography in Fifty Cameras

- If I Were a Book

- The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener

- The Philosophers Toolkit: A Compendium of Philosophical Concepts and Methods

- Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism

- Wonderful Life With the Elements: The Periodic Table Personified

- Where Everything Lost is Found

- Answers for Aristotle: How Science and Philosophy Can Lead Us to A More Meaningful Life

Rewiews:

Jun 15, 2016 Darwin8u Rated it: it was ok Shelves: 2016 "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." -- Richard P Feynman

I bought this book shortly after I bought Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer: Complicated Stuff in Simple Words and What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions and at the same time I purchased Joyce's The Cats of Copenhagen. So, I guess I was going through a nerd graphic need for pictures with my words. I've always liked logic, books on logical fallacies, de "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." -- Richard P Feynman

I bought this book shortly after I bought Randall Munroe's Thing Explainer: Complicated Stuff in Simple Words and What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions and at the same time I purchased Joyce's The Cats of Copenhagen. So, I guess I was going through a nerd graphic need for pictures with my words. I've always liked logic, books on logical fallacies, debate, and rhetoric. I figured this might be an

interesting book to get for my kids. What isn't to like? Logic presented by anthropomorphized squirrels and badgers? Sign me up. The problem is, however, the book was aiming for a couple different audiences and missed them all. Is this a primer on logic? I'm not sure if the way it is laid out and introduced will prime my kids to either be: a) interested in logic or b) better at logic. The book itself suggests this is their primary audience on page 1 under the title: Who is this book for? "This book is aimed at newcomers to the field of logical reasoning, particularly those who, to borrow a phrase from Pascal, are so made that they understand best through visuals." Is this aimed (unofficially) at those who love logic and are searching for a coffee table book or nontraditional text? Well, I can't speak for the whole universe of logic lovers, but in my case I found BOTH the words and drawings a bit too messy and almost incoherent. Ugh. The author claims in the Preface that he wanted to create, unlike Lewis Carroll and George Orwell, a " narrative that ties the illustrations together". There just seemed to be a larger void between the wish and the execution with this book. I applaud the attempt, but perhaps, the idea required a bit more thought. I don't think the author was misinformed about logic or illustration's ability to aid in education, but it just seemed to me that, either because of brevity or arrangement the idea didn't work. Is this aimed at those who love picture books? Perhaps, but again, as I pointed out above BOTH the pictures and the text were a bit of a disappointment. Probably the only piece of this whole thing I enjoyed without reserve was the drawing of the logical family tree which showed how logical fallacies broke down into formal and informal fallacies, etc. But this part should have provided hints that some internal book logic was missing. This graphic appeared near the beginning of the book, but the arrangement of chapters for the 19 examples of bad arguments didn't fit the graphic and the table of contents was several pages earlier. Talk about missing an easy hit. Finally, it was a bit irritating to have the author describe the book's illustrations as "memorable" and "lively". I get that the author is, perhaps, tipping his hat to his illustrator (Alejandro Giraldo), but still, I'll be the judge of how lively and memorable the illustrations are OR book is thank you very much. Looking back on casual purchase of introductory books about logic, I guess I just prefer jokes with my logic instead of visuals with my logic (see: Plato and a Platypus / Aristotle and an Aardvark). Now that I think of it, this book seems to be more interesting as an example of modern book marketing (slick website, an affinity for number of web visitors, donations, metrics, etc). Anyway, don't take my word for it. You don't even need to buy it (or hell, go ahead and buy it I don't care), just go to the book's website.

Oh, and here is the real rub. I was irritated enough with the whole book I actually went through the process of returning it to Amazon. They asked why, I gave them a quick answer. They refunded my money and said, "PLEASE DON'T SEND IT BACK". I know they were just being logical in an economic sense. The $10 I paid for it after prime shipping it to me, made it basically more economical to just give me my money back rather than shipping it out again. Again, that was logical, but part of me just FELT like even they didn't want it. 25 likes 11 comments