Maintain and Enhance High Academic Standards, Rigor and Expectations (FP1) Goal 1
Challenge Every Student to Fulfill Their Potential
Indicator 1 Students and graduates indicate they are/were challenged at school (expectations/rigor)
Create and Maintain a Quality Learning Environment (FP2)
Class Size
Goal 5 Indicator 26
i2 Parents indicate their children are challenged at school (expectations/rigor)
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size
i27 Students & parents and teachers indicate the importance smaller classes
i3 Test Data i4 Post Graduate Placement i5 Percentage of past graduates indicating they were well-prepared for college/work i6 Parents, students, & graduates indicate teachers expect very good work i7 Parents, students, & graduates indicate classes are academically rigorous and challenging i8 Stakeholders indicate the school has high expectations for learning i9 Students indicate they are learning the skills they need to be successful
Individualized Goal 2 Indicator 10 Level of Differentiation
Student Focus
Quality Facilities
Goal 6
Indicator 28 Stakeholders satisfied with NCR1 facilities
i11 Students & graduates indicate the teacher likes/understands/encourages them
i29 Stakeholders satisfied with facilities to meet student needs
i12 Parents indicate the teacher likes/understands/encourages students
i30 Stakeholders indicate the school buildings are in good condition
i13 Percentage of students involved in extra-curricular activities
i31 Parents and students indicate they feel our schools are safe for students
i14 Stakeholders satisfied with the range of extra-curricular activities offered i15 Students indicate they are proud to be from NCR1
Goal 3
Effective Parent Teacher Communication
Indicator 16 Percent of parents & graduates utilizing district information sources (Website, messenger, newsletters)
Goal 4
Technology
Goal 7
Indicator 32 Ratio of computers to 9-12 students i33 Ratio of computers to K-8 students
i17 Percent of parents indicating they feel welcomed at child’s school
i34 Use of technology as an effective instructional tool
i18 Percent of parents that indicate they are well-informed about NCR1 i19 Percent of parents that indicate satisfaction with level/quality of teacher contact
i35 Number of past graduates indicating that they were exposed to needed technology while at NCR1
i20 Develop and implement a NCR1 Communication Plan
i36 Parents and students indicate NCR1 prepares students for using technology
Retain Quality and Supportive Teachers
Indicator 21 Rank all certified salaries as compared to regional cohort group i22 Percent satisfied with administrative leadership
Goal 8
Community Support
Indicator 37 Overall satisfaction of patrons, parents, students, and past graduates
i23 Percent of staff retained
i38 Stakeholder satisfaction with fiscal management of district
i24 Percent of staff satisfied with job
i39 Audit reports / ASBR
i25 Teachers indicate they are proud to work at NCR1
i40 Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community is proud of NCR1 i41 Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community supports NCR1
NCR1 Strategic Planning Committee
SPC Survey Results
TOTAL G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8
North Callaway School District
Agree Disagree 82.5% 11.0% 79.3% 12.6% 83.5% 9.6% 84.9% 15.1% 79.3% 2.1% 81.8% 0.0% 77.5% 22.5% 87.7% 11.8% 85.7% 14.3%
12/11/2012..Baseline Data
Challenge Every Student to Fulfill Their Potential Individualized Student Focus Effective Parent Teacher Communication Retain Quality and Supportive Teachers Class Size Quality Facilities Technology Community Support
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
G7
G8
SUMMARY
SPC Survey Results
FP1 FP2
Agree Disagree 81.7% 9.9% 83.2% 12.2%
North Callaway School District
12/11/2012..Baseline Data
Maintain and Enhance High Academic Standards, Rigor and Expectations (FP1) Create and Maintain a Quality Learning Environment (FP2)
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% FP1
FP2
FP SUMMARY
Areas to Improve
Goals to Improve G1
Challenge Every Student to Fulfill Their Potential
G4
Retain Quality and Supportive Teachers
G6
Quality Facilities
Indicators to Improve i3
Test Data
i4
Post Graduate Placement
i7
Parents, students, & graduates indicate classes are academically rigorous and challenging
i10
Level of Differentiation
i11
Students & graduates indicate the teacher likes/understands/encourages them
i13
Percentage of students involved in extra-curricular activities
i16
Percent of parents & graduates utilizing district information sources ( Website, messenger, newsletters)
i21
Rank all certified salaries as compared to regional cohort group
i23
Percent of staff retained
i28
Stakeholders satisfied with NCR1 facilities
i30
Stakeholders indicate the school buildings are in good condition
i36
Parents and students indicate NCR1 prepares students for using technology
i38
Stakeholder satisfaction with fiscal management of district
Goal #1 - Challenge Every Student to Fulfill Their Potential
Challenge Every Student to Fulfill Their Potential TOTAL i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9
Agree 79.3% 88.4% 86.7% 55.7% 70.6% 66.7% 91.4% 76.2% 88.6% 89.1%
Disagree 12.6% 11.6% 13.3% * * 33.3% 8.6% 24.1% 11.4% 10.9%
Students and graduates indicate they are/were challenged at school (expectations/rigor) Parents indicate their children are challenged at school (expectations/rigor) Test Data Post Graduate Placement Percentage of past graduates indicating they were well-prepared for college/work Parents, Students, & graduates indicating teachers expect very good work Parents, Students, & graduates indicate classes are academically rigorous and challanging Stakeholders indicate the school has high expectations for learning Students indicate they are learning the skills they need to be successful
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% i1
i2
i3
i4
i5
i6
i7
i8
i9
GOAL # 1
TOTAL
Goal #2 - Individualized Student Focus
Individualized Student Focus TOTAL i10 i11a i11b i11c i12a i12b i12c i13 i14 i15
Agree 83.5% 55.7% 89.6% 72.0% 93.4% 96.0% 90.2% 90.9% 75.9% 82.6% 89.1%
Disagree 9.6% Level of Differentiation Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Parents indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Parents indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Parents indicate the teacher (a) likes, (b) understands, & (c) encourages them Percent of students involved in extra-curricular activies Stakeholders satisfied with the range of extra-curricular activities offered Students indicate they are proud to be from NCR1
10.4% 28.0% 6.6% 4.0% 9.8% 9.1% 17.4% 10.9%
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
Agree Disagree
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
TOTAL
i10
i11a
i11b
i11c
i12a
i12b
i12c
i13
i14
i15
GOAL # 2
0.0%
Goal #3 - Effective Parent Teacher Communication
Effective Parent Teacher Communication TOTAL i16a i16b i16c i17 i18 i19 i20
Agree 84.9% 77.5% 89.3% 80.7% 92.4% 81.2% 88.4%
Disagree 15.1% 22.5% 10.7% 19.3% 7.6% 18.8% 11.6%
Percent of parents & graduates utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) messenger, & (c) newsletters Percent of parents utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) messenger, & (c) newsletters Percent of parents utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) messenger, & (c) newsletters
Percent of parents indicating they feel welcomed at their child's school Percent of parents that indicate they are well-informed about NCR1 Percent of parents that indicate satisfaction with level/quality of teacher contact Develop and Implement a NCR1 Communication Plan
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% i16a
i16b
i16c
i17
i18
i19
GOAL # 3
TOTAL
Goal #4 - Retain Quality and Supportive Teachers
Retain Quality and Supportive Teachers TOTAL i21 i22 i23 i24 i25
Agree 79.3% 30.7% 92.5% 76.2% 98.5% 98.5%
Disagree 2.1% * 7.5% * 1.5% 1.5%
Rank all certified salaries as compared to regional cohort group Percent satisfied with administrative leadership Percent of staff retained Percent of staff satisfied with job Teachers indicate they are proud to work at NCR1
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
Agree Disagree
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
TOTAL
i21
i22
i23
i24
i25
GOAL # 4
0.0%
Goal #5 - Class Size
Class Size TOTAL i26 i27
Agree 81.8% 81.8% 90.5%
Disagree * * 9.5%
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size Students & parents and teachers indicate the importance smaller classes
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
TOTAL
i26
i27
GOAL # 5
0.0%
Goal #6 - Quality Facilities
Quality Facilities TOTAL i28 i29 i30 i31
Agree 77.5% 78.8% 80.3% 73.3% 95.1%
Disagree 22.5% 21.2% 19.7% 26.7% 5.0%
Stakeholders satisfied with NCR1 facilities Stakeholders satisfied with facilities to meet student needs Stakeholders indicate the school buildings are in good condition Parents and students indicate they feel our schools are safe for students
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0%
TOTAL
i28
i29
i30
i31
GOAL # 6
0.0%
Goal #7 - Technology
Technology TOTAL i32 i33 i34 i35 i36
Agree 87.7% 100.0% 85.0% 86.9% 87.5% 79.0%
Disagree 11.8% * * 13.1% 25.0% 21.0%
Ratio of computers to 9-12 students Ratio of computers to K-8 students Use of technology as an effective instructional tool Number of past graduates indicating that they were exposed to needed technology while at NCR1 Parents and students indicate NCR1 prepares students for using technology
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
Agree Disagree
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
TOTAL
i32
i33
i34
i35
i36
GOAL # 7
0.0%
Goal # 8 - Community Support
Community Support TOTAL i37 i38 i40 i41
Agree 85.7% 88.6% 79.2% 87.1% 87.8%
Disagree 14.3% 11.4% 20.8% 12.9% 12.1%
Overall satisfaction of patrons, parents, students, and past graduates Stakeholder satisfaction with fiscal management of district Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community is proud of NCR1 Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community supports NCR1
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Agree Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL i39
i37
i38
i40
i41
Audit reports / ASBR
GOAL # 8
i1
i1
Students and graduates indicate they are/were challenged at school (expectations/rigor) Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
449 9
138 0
262 5
43 3
6 1
TOTAL
458
138
267
46
7
Total % 30.1% 58.3% 10.0% 1.5%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 30.7% 58.4% 9.6% 1.3%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 0.0% 55.6% 33.3% 11.1%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 88.4% 11.6%
Patron
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 55.6% 44.4%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i2
Parents indicate their children are challenged at school (expectations/rigor)
i2
Total 353
S.A. 72
Agree 234
Disagree 40
S.D. 7
TOTAL
353
72
234
40
7
Total % 20.4% 66.3% 11.3% 2.0%
Parent 20.4% 66.3% 11.3% 2.0%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 86.7% 13.3%
Parent 86.7% 13.3%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i3
Test Data
MSIP Data - % Proficient or Advanced on the MAP test K-12 District Data 2010 English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
2011
2012
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
55.0% 59.2% 54.0% 52.5%
78.6% 84.6% 77.1% 75.0%
62.9% 67.7% 61.7% 60.0%
56.1% 57.7% 52.3% 58.8%
80.1% 82.4% 74.7% 84.0%
64.1% 65.9% 59.8% 67.2%
52.4% 46.7% 50.2% 45.5%
74.9% 66.7% 71.7% 65.0%
59.9% 53.4% 57.4% 52.0%
2010 63.1%
2011 64.3%
2012 55.7%
District Goal is to have 70% of our students score proficient or advanced 2010 English 62.9% Math 67.7% Science 61.7% Social Studies60.0% TOTAL 63.1%
2011 64.1% 65.9% 59.8% 67.2% 64.3%
2012 59.9% 53.4% 57.4% 52.0% 55.7%
TOTAL
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 2010 40.0%
2011 2012
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% English
Math
Science
Social Studies i3
i4 4 yr 2 yr Tech Military Work Total
Post Sec Work
Post Graduate Data 2008 30 28 8 4 30 100
% 2009 28.3% 43 26.4% 38 7.5% 7 3.8% 9 28.3% 43 140
70 70.0% 30 30.0%
% 2010 40.6% 38 35.8% 27 6.6% 5 8.5% 2 40.6% 31 103
97 69.3% 43 30.7%
% 2011 35.8% 44 25.5% 28 4.7% 5 1.9% 0 29.2% 33 110
72 69.9% 31 30.1%
% 2012 41.5% 35 26.4% 25 4.7% 12 0.0% 6 31.1% 28 106
77 70.0% 33 30.0%
78 28
% 33.0% 23.6% 11.3% 5.7% 26.4%
73.6% 26.4%
TOTAL 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Post Secondary 70.6% 70.0% 69.3% 69.9% 70.0% 73.6% Work 29.4% 30.0% 30.7% 30.1% 30.0% 26.4%
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Post Secondary
40.0%
Work
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 i4
i5
i5
Percentage of past graduates indicating they were well-prepared for college/work Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
9
3
3
2
1
TOTAL
9
3
3
2
1
Total % 33.3% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1%
Parent
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 33.3% 33.3% 22.2% 11.1%
35.0% 30.0% 25.0% Strongly Agree 20.0%
Agree Disagree
15.0%
Strongly Disagree 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 66.7% 33.3%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 66.7% 33.3%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i6
i6
Parents, Students, & graduates indicating the teachers expect very good work Total 358
S.A. 122
Agree 215
Disagree 17
S.D. 4
449 9
138 2
262 7
43 0
6 0
TOTAL
816
262
484
60
10
Total % 32.1% 59.3% 7.4% 1.2%
Parent 34.1% 60.1% 4.7% 1.1%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 30.7% 58.4% 9.6% 1.3%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 22.2% 77.8% 0.0% 0.0%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0%
Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 91.4% 8.6%
Parent 94.1% 5.9%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 100.0% 0.0%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i7
i7
Parents, Students, & graduates indicate classes are academically rigorous and challanging
Total 353
S.A. 67
Agree 224
Disagree 58
S.D. 6
452 9
59 0
265 5
113 3
15 1
TOTAL
814
126
494
174
22
Total % 15.5% 60.7% 21.4% 2.7%
Parent 19.0% 63.5% 16.4% 1.7%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 13.1% 58.6% 25.0% 3.3%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 0.0% 55.6% 33.3% 11.1%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 76.2% 24.1%
Parent 82.4% 18.1%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 71.7% 28.3%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 55.6% 44.4%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i8
Stakeholders indicate the school has high expectations for learning
i8 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 356 147 449 9 133
S.A. 96 43 138 4 59
Agree 217 79 262 2 69
Disagree 37 13 43 2 5
S.D. 6 12 6 1 0
TOTAL
1094
340
629
100
25
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 31.1% 57.5% 9.1% 2.3%
Parent 27.0% 61.0% 10.4% 1.7%
Patron 29.3% 53.7% 8.8% 8.2%
Student 30.7% 58.4% 9.6% 1.3%
Graduate Teacher 44.4% 44.4% 22.2% 51.9% 22.2% 3.8% 11.1% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 88.6% 11.4%
Parent 87.9% 12.1%
Student
Patron 83.0% 17.0%
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 96.2% 66.7% 3.8% 33.3%
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i9
Students indicate they are learning the skills they need to be successful
i9
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
449
138
262
43
6
TOTAL
449
138
262
43
6
Total % 30.7% 58.4% 9.6% 1.3%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 30.7% 58.4% 9.6% 1.3%
Graduate Teacher
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 89.1% 10.9%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i10
Level of Differentiation
MSIP Data - % Proficient or Advanced on the MAP test K-12 District Data 2010 English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
2011
2012
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
District %
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
55.0% 59.2% 54.0% 52.5%
78.6% 84.6% 77.1% 75.0%
62.9% 67.7% 61.7% 60.0%
56.1% 57.7% 52.3% 58.8%
80.1% 82.4% 74.7% 84.0%
64.1% 65.9% 59.8% 67.2%
52.4% 46.7% 50.2% 45.5%
74.9% 66.7% 71.7% 65.0%
59.9% 53.4% 57.4% 52.0%
2010 63.1%
2011 64.3%
2012 55.7%
District Goal is to have 70% of our students score proficient or advanced 2010 2011 2012 English 62.9% 64.1% 59.9% Math 67.7% 65.9% 53.4% Science 61.7% 59.8% 57.4% Social Studies60.0% 67.2% 52.0% TOTAL 63.1% 64.3% 55.7%
TOTAL
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 2010 40.0%
2011 2012
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% English
Math
Science
Social Studies i10
i11a
i11a
Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
453 9
139 6
266 3
33 0
15 0
TOTAL
462
145
269
33
15
Total % 31.4% 58.2% 7.1% 3.2%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 30.7% 58.7% 7.3% 3.3%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 89.6% 10.4%
Student
Parent
Patron
Graduate
Student 89.4% 10.6%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 100.0% 0.0%
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i11b
i11b
Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
455 9
55 5
270 4
97 0
33 0
TOTAL
464
60
274
97
33
Total % 12.9% 59.1% 20.9% 7.1%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 12.1% 59.3% 21.3% 7.3%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 55.6% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 72.0% 28.0%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 71.4% 28.6%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 100.0% 0.0%
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i11c
i11c
Students & graduates indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
460 9
159 6
270 3
22 0
9 0
TOTAL
469
165
273
22
9
Total % 35.2% 58.2% 4.7% 1.9%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 34.6% 58.7% 4.8% 2.0%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 93.4% 6.6%
Patron
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 93.3% 6.7%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 100.0% 0.0%
120.0%
100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i12a
i12a
Parents indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total 349
S.A. 148
Agree 187
Disagree 14
S.D. 0
TOTAL
349
148
187
14
0
Total % 42.4% 53.6% 4.0% 0.0%
Parent 42.4% 53.6% 4.0% 0.0%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 96.0% 4.0%
Patron
Parent 96.0% 4.0%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i12b
i12b
Parents indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total 347
S.A. 111
Agree 202
Disagree 32
S.D. 2
TOTAL
347
111
202
32
2
Total % 32.0% 58.2% 9.2% 0.6%
Parent 32.0% 58.2% 9.2% 0.6%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 90.2% 9.8%
Parent 90.2% 9.8%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i12c
i12c
Parents indicate the teacher (a)likes/(b)understands/(c)encourages them Total 351
S.A. 141
Agree 178
Disagree 31
S.D. 1
TOTAL
351
141
178
31
1
Total % 40.2% 50.7% 8.8% 0.3%
Parent 40.2% 50.7% 8.8% 0.3%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 90.9% 9.1%
Parent 90.9% 9.1%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i13
i13 FFA Biology Club National Honor Society Art Club Spanish Club Renaissance FBLA Future Teachers of America Quiz Bowl Math Club SADD Yearbook Student Council Softball Football Cross Country Fall Cheerleading Winter Cheerleading Boys Basketball Girls Basketball Track (boys & girls) Golf Baseball
Percentge of students invovled in extra-curricular activities
121 35 52 15 70 22 50 40 10 5 12 3 27 22 57 12 16 12 26 30 60 10 22
30.6% 8.9% 13.2% 3.8% 17.7% 5.6% 12.7% 10.1% 2.5% 1.3% 3.0% 0.8% 6.8% 5.6% 14.4% 3.0% 4.1% 3.0% 6.6% 7.6% 15.2% 2.5% 5.6%
Total Students Involved in at least one extra-curricular activity High School Enrollment 395 Total % 75.9%
300
Total % 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
40.0%
Total %
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1
i14
Stakeholders satisfied with the range of extra-curricular activities offered
i14 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 350 153 458 9 133
S.A. 98 47 134 1 44
Agree 183 87 230 8 79
Disagree 63 12 76 0 9
S.D. 6 7 18 0 1
TOTAL
1103
324
587
160
32
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 29.4% 53.2% 14.5% 2.9%
Parent 28.0% 52.3% 18.0% 1.7%
Patron 30.7% 56.9% 7.8% 4.6%
Student 29.3% 50.2% 16.6% 3.9%
Graduate Teacher 11.1% 33.1% 88.9% 59.4% 0.0% 6.8% 0.0% 0.8%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% Strongly Agree
60.0%
Agree
50.0%
Disagree
40.0%
Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 82.6% 17.4%
Student
Parent 80.3% 19.7%
Patron 87.6% 12.4%
Graduate
Student 79.5% 20.5%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 92.5% 100.0% 7.5% 0.0%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i15
Students indicate they are proud to be from NCR1
i15
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
458
195
213
26
24
TOTAL
458
195
213
26
24
Total % 42.6% 46.5% 5.7% 5.2%
Parent
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 42.6% 46.5% 5.7% 5.2%
Graduate Teacher
50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% Strongly Agree
30.0%
Agree
25.0%
Disagree
20.0%
Strongly Disagree
15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 89.1% 10.9%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i16a Percent of parents & graduates utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) messenger, & (c) newsletters
i16a
Total 355
S.A. 78
Agree 201
Disagree 67
S.D. 9
9
1
2
3
3
TOTAL
364
79
203
70
12
Total % 21.7% 55.8% 19.2% 3.3%
Parent 22.0% 56.6% 18.9% 2.5%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 11.1% 22.2% 33.3% 33.3%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 77.5% 22.5%
Parent 78.6% 21.4%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 33.3% 66.7%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i16b
i16b
Percent of parents utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) phone messenger, & (c) newsletters
Total 354
S.A. 147
Agree 169
Disagree 35
S.D. 3
TOTAL
354
147
169
35
3
Total % 41.5% 47.7% 9.9% 0.8%
Parent 41.5% 47.7% 9.9% 0.8%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 89.3% 10.7%
Parent 89.3% 10.7%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i16c
i16c
Percent of parents utilizing district information sources (a) website, (b) messenger, & (c) newsletters
Total 358
S.A. 112
Agree 177
Disagree 56
S.D. 13
TOTAL
358
112
177
56
13
Total % 31.3% 49.4% 15.6% 3.6%
Parent 31.3% 49.4% 15.6% 3.6%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 80.7% 19.3%
Parent 80.7% 19.3%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i17
Percent of parents indicating they feel welcomed at their child's school
i17
Total 355
S.A. 155
Agree 173
Disagree 21
S.D. 6
TOTAL
355
155
173
21
6
Total % 43.7% 48.7% 5.9% 1.7%
Parent 43.7% 48.7% 5.9% 1.7%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 92.4% 7.6%
Parent 92.4% 7.6%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i18
Percent of parents that indicate they are well-informed about NCR1
i18
Total 357
S.A. 88
Agree 202
Disagree 61
S.D. 6
TOTAL
357
88
202
61
6
Total % 24.6% 56.6% 17.1% 1.7%
Parent 24.6% 56.6% 17.1% 1.7%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 81.2% 18.8%
Student
Parent 81.2% 18.8%
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i19
i19
Percent of parents that indicate satisfaction with level/quality of teacher contact Total 353
S.A. 105
Agree 207
Disagree 37
S.D. 4
TOTAL
353
105
207
37
4
Total % 29.7% 58.6% 10.5% 1.1%
Parent 29.7% 58.6% 10.5% 1.1%
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 88.4% 11.6%
Parent 88.4% 11.6%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i20
i20
Develop and Implement a NCR1 Communication Plan
i21
Rank all certified salaries as compared to regional cohort group
SCHOOL DISTRICT
BS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jefferson City Columbia Moberly Wright City Mexico (Hermann) Louisiana Fulton Hallsville
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
10 11
Southern Boone South Callaway
$ 30,800.00 $ 30,515.00
12
Centralia
13 14 15 16
SCHOOL DISTRICT
35,500.00 34,353.00 33,342.00 32,250.00 31,300.00 31,250.00 31,200.00 31,155.00 31,000.00
Jefferson City Wright City South Callaway Fulton Southern Boone Welsville Montgomery Columbia Mexico
BS/BA+ 30 SALARY $ 61,692.00 $ 56,475.00 $ 53,615.00 $ 48,985.00 $ 48,900.00 $ 48,200.00 $ 46,981.00 $ 46,671.00 $ 45,875.00 $ 45,136.00 $ 44,500.00
$ 30,500.00
Pike County (Clopin) North Callaway R1 Gasconade Co R1 (Hermann)
$ 43,950.00
Montgomery Elsberry R II Bowling Green North Callaway R1
$ $ $ $
Louisiana Moberly Hallsville Elsberry R II
$ $ $ $
17 18
Pike County (Clopin) Van Far
$ 29,423.00 $ 28,115.00
Van Far Centralia
19 20
Welsville New Bloomfield
$ 27,500.00 $ 26,780.00
New Bloomfield Bowling Green
30,000.00 29,700.00 29,500.00 29,500.00
43,325.00 43,095.00 42,750.00 42,545.00
Jefferson City Columbia Wright City Southern Boone Hallsville South Callaway Fulton Louisiana Montgomery
MS/MA + MAX YEAR SALARY $ 68,097.00 $ 66,848.00 $ 63,800.00 $ 57,100.00 $ 56,500.00 $ 56,415.00 $ 56,210.00 $ 53,945.00 $ 53,791.00
$ 33,315.00 $ 33,200.00
Elsberry R II Welsville
$ $
52,415.00 50,600.00
$ 32,950.00
Moberly Pike County (Clopin) Mexico North Callaway R1 Bowling Green
$
50,245.00
$ $ $ $
49,386.00 48,625.00 48,625.00 48,400.00
$ $
48,285.00 45,790.00
$ $
45,650.00 45,080.00
SCHOOL DISTRICT
MS/MA
Jefferson City Moberly Wright City Columbia Louisiana Fulton Mexico Hallsville Centralia
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
South Callaway Southern Boone Gasconade Co R1 (Hermann)
$ $ $ $
39,770.00 35,260.00 35,050.00 34,353.00 34,125.00 33,830.00 33,825.00 33,500.00 33,425.00
32,237.00 31,850.00 31,500.00 31,450.00
$ 39,990.00 $ 38,495.00
Montgomery Elsberry R II North Callaway R1 Bowling Green Pike County (Clopin) Van Far
$ 31,128.00 $ 30,590.00
$ 36,380.00 $ 30,550.00
New Bloomfield Welsville
$ 30,080.00 $ 29,500.00
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Centralia Van Far Gasconade Co R1 (Hermann) New Bloomfield
i21a
BS
BS/BA+ 30 SALARY
MS/MA
MS/MA + MAX YEAR SALARY
Rank %
16 20.0%
11 45.0%
Goal 75% or Higher % of Goal 26.7% {Eq Fac} 21.3% TOTAL {Eq Fac}
60.0% 33.3% 48.0% 26.7%
15 25.0%
33.3% 26.7%
20 20 20 20 20
75.0%
30.7% BS
%
15 25.0%
21.3%
BS/BA+ 30 MS/MA + MAX YEAR MS/MA SALARY SALARY 48.0% 26.7% 26.7%
% 60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0% BS/BA+ 30 SALARY
MS/MA
MS/MA + MAX YEAR SALARY
i21b
BS
i22
Percent of staff satisfied with administrative leadership
i22
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
133
59
64
8
2
TOTAL
133
59
64
8
2
Total % 44.4% 48.1% 6.0% 1.5%
Parent
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Graduate Teacher 44.4% 48.1% 6.0% 1.5%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 92.5% 7.5%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 92.5% 7.5%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i23a
i23
Percent of staff retained
Total Left RIF Diff % Left % Retained
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 138 134 136 129 117 24 12 12 26 16 4 0 7 12 5 20 12 5 14 11 14.5% 9.0% 3.7% 10.9% 9.4% 85.5% 91.0% 96.3% 89.1% 90.6%
Retained
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 85.5% 91.0% 96.3% 89.1% 90.6%
Retention Goal 95.0%
Total 90.5%
% of Goal
{Eq Fac}
95.2%
76.2%
Retained 98.0% 96.0% 94.0% 92.0% 90.0% Retained 88.0% 86.0% 84.0% 82.0% 80.0% 2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
i23b
i23b
RIF Spouse/Transfer Stay Home/Family New Job/Higher Pay Retired Lack of Performance Health Total
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 4 1 2 0 1 2 3 8 8 5 11 2 6 3 1 3 6 5 1 4 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 24 12 12 26 16
RIF Spouse/Transfer Stay Home/Family New Job/Higher Pay Retired Lack of Performance Health
Past 5 Years 2.2% 7.8% 8.9% 37.8% 21.1% 21.1% 1.1%
Total 2 7 8 34 19 19 1 90
2.2% 7.8% 8.9% 37.8% 21.1% 21.1% 1.1%
Past 5 Years 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0%
Past 5 Years
15.0% 10.0% 5.0%
H ea lth
m an ce of Pe rfo r
La ck
R et ire d
Jo b/ H ig he rP ay
ily
N ew
e/ Fa m H om St ay
Sp ou se /T ra ns fe r
R IF
0.0%
i24
Percent of staff satisfied with job
i24
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
133
61
70
2
0
TOTAL
133
61
70
2
0
Total % 45.9% 52.6% 1.5% 0.0%
Parent
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Graduate Teacher 45.9% 52.6% 1.5% 0.0%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 98.5% 1.5%
Patron
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 98.5% 1.5%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i25
Teachers indicate they are proud to work at NCR1
i25
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
132
75
55
2
0
TOTAL
132
75
55
2
0
Total % 56.8% 41.7% 1.5% 0.0%
Parent
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Graduate Teacher 56.8% 41.7% 1.5% 0.0%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 98.5% 1.5%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 98.5% 1.5%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i26a
i26
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size
DESE Standards Grade Minimum Desired K-2 25 20 3-4 27 22 5-6 30 25 7-12 33 28
Auxvasse Class Sizes K 16 K 14 1st 16 1st 17 2nd 17 2nd 17 3rd 18 3rd 17 4th 28 5th 29 6th 34 7th 40 8th 21
Total ClassesMeets Min. 35 31 88.6%
Meets Minimum Meets Desired
Meets Desired 26 74.3%
Total Classes Meets Min. 13 10 76.9%
Meets Desired 9 69.2%
Hatton Class Sizes K 13 K 14 1st 14 1st 15 2nd 14 2nd 13 3rd 27 4th 16 4th 15 5th 25 6th 26 7th 32 8th 29
Total Classes Meets Min. 13 13 100.0%
Meets Desired 9 69.2%
Wiliamsburg Class Sizes K 12 1st 15 2nd 13 3rd 16 4th 12 5th 22 6th 25 7th 20 8th 36
Total Classes Meets Min. 9 8 88.9%
Meets Desired 8 88.9%
i26b
i26b
i26
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size
Cores ALGEBRA 1 HONORS H0749
4
P4(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 16
ALGEBRA 1 HONORS H0749
7
P7(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 16
ALGEBRA 1 H0751
3
P3(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 23
ALGEBRA 1 H0751
6
P6(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K15
ALGEBRA 1AH0750
5
P5(A)
MUELLER, JOEY B
10 MATH ANALYSIS H0756
2
P2(A)
MUELLER, JOEY11 B
ALGEBRA 1AH0750
7
P7(A)
MUELLER, JOEY B
7 PHYSICS HONORS H0502
2
P2(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 27 K
ALGEBRA 1BH0752
1
P1(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K13 PHYSICS
H0501
1
P1(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 10 K
ALGEBRA 1BH0752
5
P5(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 12 PHYSICS
H0501
3
P3(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 10 K
ALGEBRA 2 H0755
1
P1(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 12 PHYSICS
H0501
4
P4(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 23 K
ALGEBRA 2 H0755
6
P6(A)
WILBERS, ADAM L. 19 PHYSICS
H0501
5
P5(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 18 K
AMERICAN HISTORY H0251
1
P1(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS
23 WORLD HISTORY H0253
1
P1(A)
JEFFRIES, KATHLEEN 19 P
AMERICAN HISTORY H0251
2
P2(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS
22 WORLD HISTORY H0253
3
P3(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS 15
AMERICAN HISTORY H0251
6
P6(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS
22 WORLD HISTORY H0253
4
P4(A)
JEFFRIES, KATHLEEN 20 P
AMERICAN HISTORY H0251
7
P7(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS
26 WORLD HISTORY H0253
5
P5(A)
MILLER, MATHIAS 16
BIOLOGY 2 H0505
7
P7(A)
MADDOX, MADALYN 10 K WORLD HISTORY H0253
7
P7(A)
JEFFRIES, KATHLEEN 19 P
BIOLOGY HONORS H0504
2
P2(A)
HOUCHINS, ASHLI R 15
924
BIOLOGY HONORS H0504
4
P4(A)
HOUCHINS, ASHLI R 16
14
BIOLOGY
H0503
3
P3(A)
HOUCHINS, ASHLI R 18
BIOLOGY
H0503
6
P6(A)
HOUCHINS, ASHLI R 22
BIOLOGY
H0503
7
P7(A)
HOUCHINS, ASHLI R 20
CHEMISTRY 1H0507
1
P1(A)
COYLE, STEPHANIE 1 C3
CHEMISTRY 1H0507
5
P5(A)
Total Classes Meets Min. 64 64 COYLE, STEPHANIE 2 C0 100.0%
CHEMISTRY 1H0507
6
P6(A)
COYLE, STEPHANIE 1 C8
CHEMISTRY APPLICATIONS H0513 2
P2(A)
COYLE, STEPHANIE 1 C7
COLLEGE ALGEBRA* H0757
2
P2(A)
LAUER, CASSIE L
18
COLLEGE ALGEBRA* H0757
3
P3(A)
LAUER, CASSIE L
24
COLLEGE CALCULUS H0758 *
1
P1(A)
LAUER, CASSIE L
9
COLLEGE COMPOSITION* H0009 1
P1(A)
HAMM, JUSTIN D
25
COLLEGE COMPOSITION* H0009 6
P6(A)
HAMM, JUSTIN D
24
COLLEGE GENERAL H0511 CHEMISTRY* 4
P4(A)
COYLE, STEPHANIE 1 C2
COLLEGE GENERAL H0511 CHEMISTRY* 7
P7(A)
COYLE, STEPHANIE 1 C7
ENGLISH 1 HONORS H0002
5
P5(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
26
ENGLISH 1
H0001
1
P1(A)
MASON, CASSI JO
24
ENGLISH 1
H0001
2
P2(A)
MASON, CASSI JO
23
ENGLISH 1
H0001
6
P6(A)
MASON, CASSI JO
15
ENGLISH 2 HONORS H0004
3
P3(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
13
ENGLISH 2 HONORS H0004
6
P6(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
16
ENGLISH 2
H0003
1
P1(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
18
ENGLISH 2
H0003
2
P2(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
19
ENGLISH 2
H0003
4
P4(A)
KRAMPE, ERIC A.
21
ENGLISH 3 HONORS H0006
3
P3(A)
HAMM, JUSTIN D
16
ENGLISH 3 HONORS H0006
4
P4(A)
HAMM, JUSTIN D
21
ENGLISH 3
H0005
1
P1(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L19
ENGLISH 3
H0005
3
P3(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L20
ENGLISH 3
H0005
5
P5(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L13
ENGLISH 4
H0017
2
P2(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L16
ENGLISH 4
H0017
4
P4(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L11
FUNDAMENTALS H0754 GEOMETRY 6
P6(A)
MUELLER, JOEY B
GEOMETRY H0753
2
P2(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K22
GEOMETRY H0753
3
P3(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K21
GEOMETRY H0753
5
P5(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K26
INTER COLL ALGEBRA H0810
4
P4(A)
O'NEAL, CHARLES K13
LITERACY ESSENTIALS H0022
7
P7(A)
SCHULTZ, JANELLE L8
MATH ANALYSIS H0756
1
P1(A)
MUELLER, JOEY B
Meets Desired 64 100.0%
11
22
i26c
i26
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size
Other (Practical Art, Fine Art, Physical Ed, Etc.) ACCOUNTING H1601 1 2 P2(A) RANDOLPH, MARSHALL 13 REID ADVANCEDH2702 BODY CONDITIONING 4 P4(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 25 J AG CONSTRUCTION H1560 13 P3(A) BOWLING, CURTIS 11 AG CONSTRUCTION H1560 16 P6(A) BOWLING, CURTIS 14 AG CONSTRUCTION H1561 21 P1(A) BOWLING, CURTIS 9 AG. SCIENCE H1501 1 3 P3(A) MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 21 R AG. SCIENCE H1501 1 4 P4(A) BOWLING, CURTIS 19 AG. SCIENCE H1501 1 6 P6(A) MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 20 OUTDOOR R H2705 SPORTS7 AG. SCIENCE H1551 2 4 P4(A) MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 19 PEP BANDH1102 R 4 ART 1 H1001 3 P3(A) ST. CLAIR, JAMIE 19 SELECT CHOIR H1110 2 ART 1 H1001 5 P5(A) ST. CLAIR, JAMIE 19 SPANISH 1H2601 1 ST. CLAIR, JAMIE 19 SPANISH 1H2601 4 ART 1 H1001 6 P6(A) ART 2 H1051 4 P4(A) ST. CLAIR, JAMIE 15 SPANISH 1H2601 5 ST. CLAIR, JAMIE2 SPANISH 1H2601 7 ART 3 H1054 4 P4(A) ART TECHNOLOGY H1052 12 P2(A) ST. CLAIR, JAMIE 10 SPANISH 2H2602 2 BAND H1101 1 P1(A) RAUSCH, AUSTIN 24KURT SPANISH 2H2602 6 BODY CONDITIONING H2701 1 P1(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 12 SPEECH J 1 H0240 3 BODY CONDITIONING H2701 2 P2(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 16 SPEECH J 1 H0240 7 BODY CONDITIONING H2701 5 P5(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 21 J BODY CONDITIONING H2701 6 P6(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 27 J BODY CONDITIONING H2701 7 P7(A) EMMONS, MICHAEL 32 J BUSINESSH1603 TECHNOLOGY 2 P2(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 10 A BUSINESSH1603 TECHNOLOGY 5 P5(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 16 Total A Classes Meets Min. COMPUTER H1602 APPLICATION 1 P1(A) RANDOLPH, MARSHALL 24 REID 54 54 COMPUTER H1602 APPLICATION 4 P4(A) RANDOLPH, MARSHALL 20 REID 100.0% DESKTOP PUBLISHING H1651 1 1 P1(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 15 A DESKTOP PUBLISHING H1651 6 1 P6(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 16 A DESKTOP PUBLISHING H1651 7 1 P7(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 15 A DRAMATICS H1201 1 4 P4(A) MASON, CASSI JO 22 FOOD SCIENCE H1540 7 P7(A) BOWLING, CURTIS 20 FUND OF MARKETING H1605 3 P3(A) RANDOLPH, MARSHALL 18 REID FUND OF MARKETING H1605 5 P5(A) RANDOLPH, MARSHALL 26 REID GREENHOUSE H1506 MANAGEMENT 5 P5(A) 2 MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 19 R GREENHOUSE H1505 OPER/MAN 1 P1(A) MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 10 R GREENHOUSE H1505 OPER/MAN 7 P7(A) MILHOLLIN, KATHERINE 12 R HUMAN ANATOMY/PHYS H0510 5 P5(A) HOUCHINS, ASHLI 21 R LIFETIME SPORTS H2707 QUARTER 4 P4(A) TURLINGTON, TIMOTHY 13 S LIFETIME SPORTS H2703 1 P1(A) METCALF, TERRY 18 LIFETIME SPORTS H2703 3 P3(A) TURLINGTON, TIMOTHY 15 S LIFETIME SPORTS H2703 6 P6(A) TURLINGTON, TIMOTHY 26 S MIXED CHORUS H1111 3 P3(A) WIEBERG, KATIE25A MULTIMEDIA H1652 3 P3(A) MONTCALM, LESLIE 3 A MUSIC APPRECIATION H1115 2 P2(A) RAUSCH, AUSTIN7 KURT MUSIC THEORY H1116 3 P3(A) RAUSCH, AUSTIN5 KURT
P7(A) P4(A) P2(A) P1(A) P4(A) P5(A) P7(A) P2(A) P6(A) P3(A) P7(A)
TURLINGTON,9 TIMOTHY RAUSCH, AUSTIN 11 KURT WIEBERG, KATIE 23 A MUHLENBRUCK, 15 RUSS MUHLENBRUCK, 18 RUSS MUHLENBRUCK, 9 RUSS MUHLENBRUCK, 21 RUSS MUHLENBRUCK, 18 RUSS MUHLENBRUCK, 20 RUSS MASON, CASSI 25 JO MASON, CASSI 25 JO 717 14.3
Meets Desired 54 100.0%
i26d
i26
Maintain DESE desirable standards for class size
High School Core Classes Other (Practical Art, Fine Art, Physical Ed, Etc.) Total Classes Meets Min. Meets Desired 64 64 64 100.0% 100.0% Total Classes Meets Min. Meets Desired 54 54 54 100.0% 100.0%
Auxvasse Total Classes Meets Min. Meets Desired 13 10 9 76.9% 69.2% Hatton Total Classes Meets Min. Meets Desired 13 13 9 100.0% 69.2%
16.8 17.9
Meets Min. Meets Desired Auxvasse 76.9% 69.2% Hatton 100.0% 69.2% Williamsburg100.0% 88.9% High School100.0% 100.0% TOTAL 94.2% 81.8%
DESE Standards Grade Minimum Desired K-2 25 20 3-4 27 22 5-6 30 25 7-12 33 28
Williamsburg Total Classes Meets Min. Meets Desired 9 8 8 88.9% 88.9% Total ClassesMeets Min. Meets Desired 35 31 26 88.6% 74.3%
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Meets Min.
60.0%
Meets Desired
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% Auxvasse
Hatton
Williamsburg
High School
TOTAL
i27
i27
Students and parents indicate the importance of smaller classes Total 359
S.A. 261
Agree 89
Disagree 8
S.D. 1
459
212
178
50
19
TOTAL
818
473
267
58
20
Total % 57.8% 32.6% 7.1% 2.4%
Parent 72.7% 24.8% 2.2% 0.3%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 46.2% 38.8% 10.9% 4.1%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 90.5% 9.5%
Patron
Parent 97.5% 2.5%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 85.0% 15.0%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
120.0%
100.0%
80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0%
20.0%
0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i28
Stakeholders satisfied with NCR1 facilities
i28 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 354 154 456 9 133
S.A. 69 20 62 2 26
Agree 217 81 306 3 86
Disagree 59 32 71 3 20
S.D. 9 21 17 1 1
TOTAL
1106
179
693
185
49
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 16.2% 62.7% 16.7% 4.4%
Parent 19.5% 61.3% 16.7% 2.5%
Patron 13.0% 52.6% 20.8% 13.6%
Student 13.6% 67.1% 15.6% 3.7%
Graduate Teacher 22.2% 19.5% 33.3% 64.7% 33.3% 15.0% 11.1% 0.8%
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 78.8% 21.2%
Parent 80.8% 19.2%
Student
Patron 65.6% 34.4%
Graduate
Student 80.7% 19.3%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 84.2% 55.6% 15.8% 44.4%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i29
Stakeholders satisfied with facilities to meet student needs
i29 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 353 152 458 9 133
S.A. 76 23 89 2 20
Agree 210 81 294 4 88
Disagree 58 29 63 3 24
S.D. 9 19 12 0 1
TOTAL
1105
210
677
177
41
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 19.0% 61.3% 16.0% 3.7%
Parent 21.5% 59.5% 16.4% 2.5%
Patron 15.1% 53.3% 19.1% 12.5%
Student 19.4% 64.2% 13.8% 2.6%
Graduate Teacher 22.2% 15.0% 44.4% 66.2% 33.3% 18.0% 0.0% 0.8%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
TOTAL 80.3% 19.7%
Patron
Parent 81.0% 19.0%
Student
Patron 68.4% 31.6%
Graduate
Student 83.6% 16.4%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 81.2% 66.7% 18.8% 33.3%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i30
Stakeholders indicate the school buildings are in good condition
i30 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 354 151 456 9 133
S.A. 59 14 47 1 21
Agree 228 80 262 4 93
Disagree 55 39 111 4 18
S.D. 12 18 36 0 1
TOTAL
1103
142
667
227
67
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 12.9% 60.5% 20.6% 6.1%
Parent 16.7% 64.4% 15.5% 3.4%
Patron 9.3% 53.0% 25.8% 11.9%
Student 10.3% 57.5% 24.3% 7.9%
Graduate Teacher 11.1% 15.8% 44.4% 69.9% 44.4% 13.5% 0.0% 0.8%
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 73.3% 26.7%
Parent 81.1% 18.9%
Student
Patron 62.3% 37.7%
Graduate
Student 67.8% 32.2%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 85.7% 55.6% 14.3% 44.4%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree
40.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i31
i31
Parents and students indicate they feel our schools are safe for students Total 359
S.A. 158
Agree 193
Disagree 7
S.D. 2
464
140
292
23
9
TOTAL
823
298
485
30
11
Total % 36.2% 58.9% 3.6% 1.3%
Parent 44.0% 53.8% 1.9% 0.6%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 30.2% 62.9% 5.0% 1.9%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Strongly Agree 40.0%
Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 95.1% 5.0%
Parent 97.8% 2.5%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 93.1% 6.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
60.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i32
i32
Ratio of computers to 9-12 students
DESE desirable standard less then 5:1 or .2:1 Workstations 196
Students 395
196:395 Computers/Student 0.496203 Students/Computer 2.015306 Computers/Student NCHS 0.49 DESE Desired 0.2
100.0%
Computers/Student
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
Computers/Student
0.2
0.1
0 NCHS
DESE Desired
i33
Ratio of computers to K-8 students
i33
Workstations 180
DESE desirable standard less then 5:1 or .2:1
Students 706
180:706 Computers/Student 0.254958 Students/Computer 3.922222 Computers/Student NC K-8 0.25 DESE Desired 0.2
85.0%
Computers/Student
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
Computers/Student
0.1
0.05
0 NC K-8
DESE Desired
i34
Use of technology as an effective instructional tool
i34
Total 346
S.A. 64
Agree 241
Disagree 40
S.D. 1
452 9 132
97 3 21
292 4 94
53 2 17
10 0 0
TOTAL
939
185
631
112
11
Total % 19.7% 67.2% 11.9% 1.2%
Parent 18.5% 69.7% 11.6% 0.3%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 21.5% 64.6% 11.7% 2.2%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 33.3% 15.9% 44.4% 71.2% 22.2% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0%
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 86.9% 13.1%
Parent 88.2% 11.8%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 86.1% 13.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 87.1% 77.8% 12.9% 22.2%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i35
i35
Number of past graduates indicating that they were exposed to needed technology while at NCR1
Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
8
3
4
2
0
TOTAL
8
3
4
2
0
Total % 37.5% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0%
Parent
Patron
Student
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 37.5% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0%
60.0% 50.0% 40.0%
Strongly Agree Agree
30.0%
Disagree Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 87.5% 25.0%
Parent
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 87.5% 25.0%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree & Agree
50.0%
Disagree & Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i36
i36
Parents and students indicate NCR1 prepares students for using technology Total 350
S.A. 66
Agree 235
Disagree 48
S.D. 1
459
86
252
101
20
TOTAL
809
152
487
149
21
Total % 18.8% 60.2% 18.4% 2.6%
Parent 18.9% 67.1% 13.7% 0.3%
Patron
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Student 18.7% 54.9% 22.0% 4.4%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher
80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Strongly Agree
50.0%
Agree
40.0%
Disagree
30.0%
Strongly Disagree
20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 79.0% 21.0%
Parent 86.0% 14.0%
Student
Patron
Graduate
Student 73.6% 26.4%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i37
Overall satisfaction of patrons, parents, students, and graduates
i37
Total 351 150 457 9
S.A. 102 36 159 2
Agree 216 88 248 6
Disagree 29 19 33 1
S.D. 4 7 17 0
TOTAL
967
299
558
82
28
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 30.9% 57.7% 8.5% 2.9%
Parent 29.1% 61.5% 8.3% 1.1%
Patron 24.0% 58.7% 12.7% 4.7%
Student 34.8% 54.3% 7.2% 3.7%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 22.2% 66.7% 11.1% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 88.6% 11.4%
Parent 90.6% 9.4%
Student
Patron 82.7% 17.3%
Graduate
Student 89.1% 10.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 88.9% 11.1%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i38
Stakeholder satisfaction with fiscal management of district
i38 Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Total 341 149 460 9 126
S.A. 78 22 63 2 25
Agree 214 92 264 7 92
Disagree 41 23 97 0 9
S.D. 8 12 36 0 0
TOTAL
1085
190
669
170
56
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Total % 17.5% 61.7% 15.7% 5.2%
Parent 22.9% 62.8% 12.0% 2.3%
Patron 14.8% 61.7% 15.4% 8.1%
Student 13.7% 57.4% 21.1% 7.8%
Graduate Teacher 22.2% 19.8% 77.8% 73.0% 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0%
90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 79.2% 20.8%
Parent 85.6% 14.4%
Student
Patron 76.5% 23.5%
Graduate
Student 71.1% 28.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 92.9% 100.0% 7.1% 0.0%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i39
i39
Audit Reports
i40
i40
Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community is proud of NCR1 Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
156 456
47 114
86 274
17 51
6 17
131
49
77
5
0
TOTAL
743
210
437
73
23
Total % 28.3% 58.8% 9.8% 3.1%
Parent
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Patron 30.1% 55.1% 10.9% 3.8%
Student 25.0% 60.1% 11.2% 3.7%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 37.4% 58.8% 3.8% 0.0%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 87.1% 12.9%
Student
Parent
Patron 85.3% 14.7%
Graduate
Student 85.1% 14.9%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 96.2% 3.8%
120.0% 100.0% 80.0% Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
i41
i41
Students, teachers, & patrons indicate the community supports NCR1 Total
S.A.
Agree
Disagree
S.D.
154 459
49 121
84 281
10 47
10 10
132
37
82
12
1
TOTAL
745
207
447
69
21
Total % 27.8% 60.0% 9.3% 2.8%
Parent
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Patron 31.8% 54.5% 6.5% 6.5%
Student 26.4% 61.2% 10.2% 2.2%
Parent Patron Students Graduates Teacher
Graduate Teacher 28.0% 62.1% 9.1% 0.8%
70.0% 60.0% 50.0%
Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Total %
Parent
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
Patron
TOTAL 87.8% 12.1%
Parent
Student
Patron 86.4% 13.0%
Graduate
Student 87.6% 12.4%
Teacher
Graduate Teacher 90.2% 9.8%
100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0%
Strongly Agree & Agree Disagree & Strongly Disagree
50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TOTAL
Parent
Patron
Student
Graduate
Teacher
