Page 1 of 3. Page 1 of 3. Page 2 of 3. Page 2 of 3. Page 3 of 3. Page 3 of 3. Doc Mar 02, 2018, 1721.pdf. Doc Mar 02, 2018, 1721.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.
This is the rich encomium paid to the Court by Master Vibhu, the. ten year old son of the appellant and respondent. The little one present. in Court today is exuberantly happy and sought liberty to present a. handmade card expressing his joy on the s
order pertains to the shop-house which was ordered. by the High Court to be retained by the tenant on. payment of enhanced rent of Rs.6,000/- per month. on the basis of a statement made by the learned. counsel appearing for the landlord. The said. or
Mar 20, 2018 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). He was serving as Director of. Technical Education in the State of Maharashtra at the relevant. time. 4. The second respondent - the complainant is an employee of. the department. He was earlier employed
lesser punishment of 10 years under Section 302. IPC to the appellant as against what is specified. under Section 302 IPC and filed criminal appeal. under Section 377 of the Code, out of which this. appeal arises, praying therein for its enhancement.
Page 1 of 9. WP(C) 494/12. 1. ITEM NO.501 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W. S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Writ Petition (Civil) No.494/2012. JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) AND ANR. Petitioner(s). VERSUS. UNION OF INDIA AND OR
JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.). Mr. Renjith B. Marar, Adv. Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal, Adv. Mr. Anubhav Anand Pandey, Adv. Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan, Adv. For Petitioner(s) Ms. V. Mohana,
Constitution of India with a prayer for mandamus directing. reinstatement of the petitioner to the post from which he was. compulsorily retired. In the interregnum period of the pendency of the present. petition, there has been unfortunate demise of
Page 1 of 7. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 38 OF 2018. CHAMPION R. SANGMA ... Petitioner. VERSUS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA ... Respondent. O R D E R. Rule Nisi. The writ petition is filed un
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. ... Section 11 of the National Green Tribunal Act 2010. contemplates that the Central Government shall in such an ... March 27, 2018. Page 3 of 3. Main menu. Displa
London Court of. International Arbitration (LCIA) and ors.) AND. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8028 OF 2015. (Global Indian Lawyers versus Bar Council of India & Ors.).
business as a pawn broker to conduct his business only after he. obtains a licence in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 5. The main business of both ...
issued a Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. (âActâ for short) for acquiring lands admeasuring about 912 Acres from. three villages ...
(deceased) went to his in-laws house on 28-09-1995 to see the well. being of his children, and to his belief his brother was killed by his. wife and in-laws. The wife of the deceased has also given a. complaint to the police. The Station OfficerâRa
Ms.Resmitha R.Chandran, Adv. Ms.Lekha Sudhakran, Adv. In I.A.15548/2018 Mr.Sanpreet Singh Ajmani, Adv. Mr.Kuldeep Rai, Adv. Mr.Jugal Kishore Gupta, Adv. Mr.Ajit Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. O R D E R. Mr.Dushyan
Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad,Adv. Mr. Nirmal Kumar Ambastha,Adv. Mr. Namit Saxena,Adv. ... Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR. Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR. Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR ... Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR. 3. Page 3 of 8. Main menu.
Mar 8, 2018 - learned senior counsel along with Mr. Haris Beeran, learned. counsel for the appellant, Mr. Maninder Singh, learned. Additional Solicitor General for the National Investigation. Agency (NIA) and Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel.
Augmentation Scheme). After commencement of work, Government of. Kerala issued a notification dated 30.03.1983, by which minimum wages ... judgment dated 02.04.1998 holding that the termination of contract was. arbitrary and ... parties is in the rea