Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32 – 39 www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres

Factorial composition of the Aggression Questionnaire: A multi-sample study in Greek adults Silia Vitoratou a,c , Ioannis Ntzoufras c , Nikolaos Smyrnis a,b , Nicholas C. Stefanis a,b,⁎ a

c

University Mental Health Research Institute, Soranou Efesiou 2, Papagou, 156 01, Athens, Greece b Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Eginition Hospital 74 Vas. Sofias Ave., Athens 115 28, Greece Department of Statistics, University of Economics and Business, Patision 76, 104 34 Athens, Greece Received 26 July 2007; received in revised form 7 January 2008; accepted 28 January 2008

Abstract The primary aim of the current article was the evaluation of the factorial composition of the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ29) in the Greek population. The translated questionnaire was administered to the following three heterogeneous adult samples: a general population sample from Athens, a sample of young male conscripts and a sample of individuals facing problems related to substance use. Factor analysis highlighted a structure similar to the one proposed by Buss and Perry [Buss, A.F., Perry, M., 1992. The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 452–459]. However, the refined 12-item version of Bryant and Smith [Bryant, F.B., Smith, B.D., 2001. Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 35, 138–167] provided a better fit to our data. Therefore, the refined model was implemented in further analysis. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis was applied in order to assess the variability of the 12-item AQ across gender and samples. The percentage of factor loading invariance between males and females and across the three samples defined above was high (higher than 75%). The reliability (internal consistency) of the scale was satisfactory in all cases. Content validity of the 12-item AQ was confirmed by comparison with the Symptom Check-List 90 Revised. © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: CFA; AQ; Psychometrics

1. Introduction Since the seminal conceptualization of aggression by Moyer (1968), subsequent efforts have strived to further refine, operationalise and quantify persistent aggressive behavior. This is not merely an academic endeavor, given ⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +30 693 660 8887; fax: +30 210 7242020. E-mail address: [email protected] (N.C. Stefanis).

rising public health concerns reflected in the international attention directed to prevention programs designed to address aggressive and violent behavior (Ahmad, 2004). Aggression is a potential predictive factor of later criminal activity during adolescence (Huesmann et al., 1984; Huesmann and Efron, 1992; Pulkkinen and Pitkanen, 1993). Furthermore, aggression is a multidimensional construct that develops within a complex interaction of biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors. While aggressive acts are state phenomena, the tendency

0165-1781/$ - see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.01.016

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39

to engage in aggressive behavior over the lifetime is relatively stable (Olweus, 1979; Huesmann et al., 1984; Coccaro et al., 1991). Self-rated aggression measures remain a popular method to assess trait aggression. Amongst these, the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ29) was created by Buss and Perry (1992) and represents an updated and psychometrically improved version of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (Buss and Durkee, 1957) that has quickly become the gold-standard for the measurement of aggression. The AQ29 has been cross-validated in several nonUS samples including Dutch (Meesters et al., 1996), Japanese (Nakano, 2001), Spanish (Garcia-Leon et al., 2002), Italian (Fossati et al., 2001), Chinese (Maxwell, 2007), Greek (Tsorbatzoudis, 2006) and German populations (Collani and Werner, 2005). Further, Williams et al. (1996), Morren and Meesters (2002) and Diamond et al. (2005) assessed the properties of the AQ29 in offender samples. As initially reported by Buss and Perry (1992) and further elaborated by other authors (Harris, 1995; Bernstein and Gesn, 1997; Garcia-Leon et al., 2002; Fossati et al., 2001), the AQ29 is a multidimensional instrument consisting of the following four subscales: Physical aggression, Verbal aggression, Anger and Hostility1. Two further proposals for the latent structure of the AQ29 are proposed in the literature, namely: a) a one-factor model, which assumes that all items load on one first order factor, and b) a second order factor implicated in the initial four-factor model. Further suggestions have been made about the questionnaire's items. Specifically, Harris (1995) proposed to omit two items from the Hostility subscale (H6 and H8), thereby raising its reliability estimators (model c). Meesters et al. (1996) reported a closer fit after further omission of the first indicator of the Verbal aggression sub-scale, resulting in a modified 26-item AQ (model d). In addition, Bryant and Smith (2001) proposed a modified version of the AQ excluded a substantial number of items (model f). The selection of the excluded items was based upon i) factor complexity (omitting items that load on more than one factor) and ii) salience of loadings (omitting items with loadings lower than 0.40), while they also omitted the two items with reverse scoring. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the proposed models in the literature regarding the Aggression Questionnaire in three Greek adult samples.

1

Hereafter the items are indicated by the item's identification number as presented in Buss and Perry (1992).

33

Moreover, the score and structure discrepancies among these samples were evaluated. 2. Methods 2.1. Participants 2.1.1. Sample 1 The translated AQ29 was administered to 307 individuals selected from the general population in the region of Rafina-Athens (randomly selected using the municipality registry). Among the individuals, 143 (46.6%) were male (mean age= 49.13, sd= 10.8, range: 22–73 years) and 164 (53.4%) were female (mean age = 49.14, sd = 11.0, range: 21–67 years). No significant age differences across genders were found (t = − 0.012, df = 301, P = 0.979). 2.1.2. Sample 2 The AQ29 was also randomly administered to 1228 male conscripts (aged 19–24 years; mean = 20.83, sd = 1.87), who were recruited from the Greek Air Force during their first 2 weeks of admission in the National Basic Air Force training centre in the city of Tripoli. This sample can be considered representative of males in this age group, since military service is obligatory in Greece. 2.1.3. Sample 3 The third sample consists of 165 volunteers, members of the Greek methadone program of the Organisation Against Drugs (ΟΚΑΝΑ) in Athens. Among the individuals, 127 (77%) were males (mean age = 36.6, sd = 5.5, range: 24–55 years) and 33 (20%) were females (mean age = 36.4 years, sd = 5.2, range: 28– 51 years); for five individuals, gender was not reported. Age did not differ significantly across gender (t = 0.176, df = 156, P = 0.861). 2.2. Measurements The Symptom Check-List 90 Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1993; Donias et al., 1991) was also administered, within the Athens Study of Psychosis Proneness and Incidence of Schizophrenia (ASPIS; Stefanis et al., 2004). The SCL-90-R is a 90-item multidimensional selfreport inventory consisting of nine subscales and three indices of psychological distress. The reliability coefficient of SCL-90-R was high for the total scale (alpha = 0.97) while the corresponding coefficients for each subscale were found to range from 0.66 to 0.87 (Stefanis et al., 2004). The AQ29 (Buss and Perry, 1992) is a self-administered inventory that consists of 29 Likert type items (scored 1 to

34

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39

5). Twelve of these items constitute the AQ12 (Bryant and Smith, 2001), which nonetheless retains the four-factor latent structure.

for significantly variant loadings were excluded. Data analysis was conducted in AMOS 5 (Arbuckle, 2003). 3. Results

2.3. Translation procedure The AQ29 adaptation for the Greek population followed the recommendations of Van de Vijver and Hampleton (1996). Specifically, the questionnaire was translated into Greek and back-translated into English by an independent official translator. Comparison of the original and the first English drafts produced a modified Greek version that received minor further changes when administered to a test sample of 15 young employees of the University Mental Health Research Institute of Athens (UMHRI). 2.4. Statistical analyses Three criteria were used to evaluate the items' intercorrelations: Measures of Sampling Adequacy for each item (MSA), the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) over all items and Bartlett's test of Sphericity (Dziuban and Shirkey, 1974). For purposes of comparison with previously reported results, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was implemented in a random split-half of the second sample (selected due to its large size). However, the factorial structure of the Greek version of the questionnaire was essentially assessed utilizing CFA via a structural equation modelling approach (Bollen, 1989). The measures of fit that are reported are in concordance with the current AQ29 literature. In this way, comparison between studies can be easily obtained. Three absolute fit indices are reported, namely the Goodness of Fit Index (GFI; Jöreskog and Sörbom, 1984), the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA; Browne and Cudeck, 1993) and the relative chi-square (χ2 /df; Hoelter, 1983). Furthermore, the fit of each model compared to the null (or independence) model was assessed by using two relative fit indices, namely the Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI; Bentler and Bonett, 1980) and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI; Bentler, 1990). The variation of the factor loadings across samples and the gender effect were assessed via Multiple Groups CFA. Equality of loadings is necessary to make comparisons between groups (Anderson and Gerbing, 1988). By examining the critical ratios of the loading difference across samples for each item (i.e. the ratio of the difference's estimate divided by the estimate of difference's standard error), the equality constraints

3.1. Sampling adequacy and exploratory factor analysis The assessment of the sampling adequacy diagnostics led to satisfactory MSA values (0.66 to 0.94). Values were lower than 0.73 for only two items. Furthermore, Bartlett's test of sphericity (chi-square = 4796.7, df = 406, P b 0.001) indicated that the intercorrelations were satisfactory, while the KMO measure was high (0.89), indicating low partial intercorrelations among items. The above findings support the existence of possible latent factors. EFA using principal axis factoring (Oblimin rotation) was implemented. Seven eigenvalues above one were found (6.8, 2.6, 1.8, 1.5, 1.2, 1.1 and 1.1). Four factors existed explaining the 43.7% of the total variance, while the next three eigenvalues represented scree2. Further investigation of the questionnaire's latent structure was implemented by CFA methodology, which follows. 3.2. Confirmatory factor analysis CFA was applied in all three Greek samples separately. Seven distinct models that have been proposed in the literature were evaluated: a) One-factor model (all items load on one first order factor), b) Initial Buss and Perry's (1992) four-factor model (four factors explain the items' covariation), c) and d) model b with reduced items as proposed correspondingly by Harris (1995) and Meesters et al. (1996), e) Hierarchical model (one second order factor underlies the four factors of the initial model b), f ) Bryant and Smith's (2001) refined model (the initial model b with the number of items reduced to 12) and g) Hierarchical refined model (one second order factor underlies the four factors of the refined model f ). The one-factor model (a) inadequately fit the data in all samples (Table 1). The indices were improved in all cases after fitting Buss and Perry's four-

2

Full EFA results are available upon request.

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39 Table 1 Absolute and relative fit indices for proposed models in the literature of AQ29 (samples 1–3). Model

a) Buss and Perry (1992): 1 global factor b) Buss and Perry (1992): 4-factor model e) Buss and Perry (1992): 1 second order factor f ) Bryant and Smith (2001): 12 items-4 factors g) Bryant and Smith (2001): 1 second order factor a b c

Sample c Absolute fit measures

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

Relative fit measures

χ2/df

GFI

RMSEA NNFI CFI

4.830 5.196 2.382 3.688 6.123 1.842 3.676 3.652 1.892 2.686 2.373 1.717 2.377 2.903 1.700

0.620 0.771 0.695 0.719 0.861 0.775 0.718 0.844 0.774 0.963 0.942 0.929 0.940 0.958 0.928

a

0.115 a 0.085 a 0.093 a 0.096 a 0.067 a 0.074 a 0.096 a 0.068 a 0.075 b 0.054 b 0.069 b 0.067 b 0.069 b 0.057 b 0.066

0.397 0.627 0.573 0.577 0.767 0.730 0.579 0.764 0.724 0.922 0.864 0.740 0.864 0.911 0.875

0.440 0.653 0.603 0.613 0.787 0.753 0.613 0.783 0.747 0.943 0.901 0.907 0.897 0.933 0.906

P ≤ 0.001. P N 0.05. Sample 1: N=290, Sample 2: N=577 and Sample 3: N=160.

factor model (b). The GFI increased substantially, while the RMSEA decreased reaching a reasonably close fit in the second and third samples but not in the first one (0.096). As can also seen by the relative chi-square, the fit of the model was adequate only in the third sample (Table 1). The fit of the hierarchical model (e) was slightly worse than the former one, in terms of both absolute and relative fit measures. In order to evaluate the proposals formulated by Harris (1995) and Meesters et al. (1996), we compared models (c) and (d) with the corresponding one for AQ29 (b). cases, the 29-item model proposed by Buss and Perry (1992) provided the best fit to model in our data, since the Browne–Cudeck Criterion (Browne and Cudeck, 1989) was smaller in all samples than the corresponding value for: the other two models (Table 2). The 12-item AQ proposed by Bryant and Smith (2001) was further evaluated. The measures of fit of model (f) were satisfactory, indicating adequate fit in all samples. The values of GFI (0.94–0.96) indicate the high proportion of variance explained. The RMSEA was not significantly higher than 0.05 with the exception of the second sample, which nevertheless corresponds to a reasonably close fit according to Browne and Cudeck (1993). The relative fit indices (NNFI and CFI) reached their highest values, with CFI being higher than 0.9 in all three samples. The relative chi-square value was lower than the threshold value of 2 only in the first

35

sample, while its values were 2.4 and 2.7 in the other two samples. Further, the corresponding hierarchical refined model (model g) provided similar indices with the latter one (Table 3). 3.3. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis 3.3.1. Gender invariance The gender invariance of the best-fitting model (i.e. Bryant and Smith model f) was examined in the first and third samples (Tables 4 and 5). The chi-square statistic did not indicate a difference in the general population sample of Athens. Hence the AQ12 satisfies the requirement of loadings invariance and scores can, be meaningfully compared across genders. Even though the chi-square statistic indicated a significant gender effect for the third sample (namely items V2 and V4, which were higher in the females' group), the sample size of the females' group (N = 33) was small (3:1 ratio of observations versus items) and may lead to unstable results. 3.3.2. Sample invariance The sample loading invariance was also assessed for the Bryant and Smith (2001) four-factor model ( f ). The chi-square statistic indicated significant sample effect; hence we proceeded with pair-wise comparisons among samples (Tables 4 and 5). Differences in the loadings were present only between the second and the third sample (items A1, H3 and V4; Table 5). 3.4. Descriptive indices and internal consistency Descriptive indices and Cronbach's (1951) alpha coefficients for each subscale and total scores for both AQ29 and AQ12 are presented in Table 1. Analysis of variance was used to compare the mean scores between the three samples. The highest scores appeared in the third sample (individuals facing problem related to substance abuse), followed by the second one (young male conscripts), while the lowest values appeared in the first sample (general population sample of Athens).

Table 2 Browne–Cudeck Criterion for three proposed models for the AQ29 (samples 1–3). Model

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

(b) 29 items (c) 27 items (d) 26 items

861.98 905.58 910.92

1511.18 1603.91 1614.65

1495.98 1594.62 1597.60

36

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39

Table 3 Descriptive indices and internal consistency of the AQ29 (and AQ12 within parentheses) subscale and total scores in samples 1, 2 and 3.

Sample 1 (General population from Athens, n = 307)

Sample 2 (Male conscripts, n = 1228)

Sample 3 (Drug dependent individuals, n = 165)

a,b,c

AQ scale

Alpha

Physical Verbal Anger Hostility Total Physical Verbal Anger Hostility Total Physical Verbal Anger Hostility Total

0.82 (0.77) 0.55 (0.55) 0.75 (0.57) 0.75 (0.66) 0.85 (0.74) 0.82 (0.70) 0.50 (0.56) 0.79 (0.60) 0.70 (0.61) 0.88 (0.77) 0.84 (0.76) 0.51 (0.48) 0.74 (0.54) 0.70 (0.63) 0.87 (0.73)

Mean

S.D.

Range

19.4 (5.6) 14.2 (7.3) a 20.1 (8.3) c 20.3 (7.3) 74.0 (28.6) 25.7 (7.9) 14.7 (7.0) a 19.7 (8.5) c 21.5 (7.2) 81.5 (30.5) 27.0 (8.8) b 15.5 (7.6) 21.0 (9.5) 24.1 (8.9) 88.6 (34.7)

6.6 (2.6) 3.1 (2.3) 5.0 (2.5) 5.0 (2.4) 14.5 (6.6) 7.3 (3.0) 3.0 (2.3) 5.6 (2.7) 5.4 (2.6) 16.3 (7.5) 7.9 (3.4) 3.0 (2.1) 5.2 (2.6) 5.4 (2.6) 16.1 (7.2)

9–43 (2–15) 5–25 (3–15) 7–34 (3–15) 8–38 (3–15) 44–122 (14–51) 9–45 (3–15) 5–25 (2–15) 7–35 (2–15) 7–40 (3–15) 35–135 (12–57) 9–45 (3–15) 8–24 (3–15) 10–35 (3–15) 8–37 (3–15) 53–123 (14–50)

b

The difference between the pairs of means was non-significant: P N 0.05.

Analysis of variance (using the Bonferroni post-hoc multiple comparisons test) revealed significant differences in all cases (P b 0.05) with the exception of the “Anger” scale between samples 1 and 2 (adjusted for age and gender). Regarding reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was high (0.85–0.88) for the total AQ29 and moderate to high for the subscales (0.50–0.84). Two problematic items were identified (Verbal subscale items 1 and 3) with low item-total correlations (lower than 0.20) and no decrease of alpha at item deletion, in all samples. Unlike the other three statements included in the “Verbal aggression” subscale of the AQ29, the items V1 (“I tell my friends openly when I disagree with them”) and V3 (“When people annoy me, I may tell them what I think

of them”) describe socially acceptable behaviours in the Greek culture. Possibly, they do not reflect aggressive behaviour; therefore the low consistency with the rest of the AQ29 items is justified. With respect to the AQ12, the corresponding Cronbach's alpha coefficients were lower (0.73–0.77 for the total scale and 0.48–0.76 for the subscales). This result was expected for the shortened AQ12 since Cronbach's alpha depends on the number of items (Pedhazur and Schmelkin, 1991). 3.5. Age and gender effect The age and gender effects on AQ12 subscale and total scores were evaluated implementing normal regression. No age effect, adjusted for gender, was present in samples 1 and 3. On the contrary, in the first sample the AQ12 scores were significantly different for

Table 4 Tests of invariance of loadings among genders and samples (AQ12 — model f ). Hypothesis for loadings

Sample

Gender invariance 1 3 Sample invariance 1, 2 and 3 1 and 2 2 and 3 3 and 1

χ2/df

1.762 1.644 2.257 2.480 2.277 1.987

RMSEA a Nested models comparison b

0.051 0.065 0.035 0.041 0.042 0.047

δχ2 (df )

P-value

15.5 (8) 27.0 (8) 35.7 (16) 15.0 (8) 25.3 (8) 10.2 (8)

0.050 0.001 0.003 0.058 0.001 0.249

P b 0.001. Differences in χ2 between the unconstrained and the constrained models. a

b

Table 5 Invariance of loadings among gender and samples (AQ12 — model f ). Hypothesis for loadings

Sample Items excluded

% Nested models Invariance comparison a δχ2 (df ) P-value

Gender invariance 1 3 Sample invariance 1 and 2 2 and 3 3 and 1 a

– 100.0 V2, V4 83.3 – 100.0 A1,V4, H3 75.0 – 100.0

– 07.6 (6) – 08.9 (5) –

0.159 0.265 – 0.114 –

Differences in chi-square (δχ2) between the unconstrained and the partially constrained models.

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39

males and females, with the exception of “Hostility” (Table 6). In both samples, males scored higher in “Physical aggression” than females. Males scored significantly higher than females in “Verbal aggression” and lower in “Anger” in the general population sample of Athens while the opposite effects emerged in the third sample. In the young males' sample (sample 2) the age effect was significant. Specifically, there was a negative age effect on “Physical Aggression” (regression coefficient = −0.31, se = 0.05, P b 0.001) and “Hostility” (r = −0.23, se = 0.04, P b 0.001) subscales. Further, a 1-year age increase corresponded to a decrease of about half a unit in the total AQ12 score (r = −0.51, se = 0.12, P b 0.001).

37

Table 7 Pearson correlation coefficients between AQ12 and SCL-90-R scores (sample 2). Correlations a between SCL-90-R and AQ12 scores

Physical Verbal Hostility Anger Total AQ12

Anxiety Depression Hostility Inter. Sensitivity Obsessive–Compulsive Paranoid ideation Phobic anxiety Psychoticism Somatization

0.14 0.16 0.38 b, c 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.07 0.12 0.11

0.18 0.19 0.28 b 0.15 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.15

0.34 c 0.42 b, c 0.26 0.37, c 0.36 c 0.32 c 0.33 c 0.32 c 0.27 c

0.23 0.27 0.36 b 0.17 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.21

0.31 0.36 0.45 0.28 0.31 0.27 0.25 0.28 0.26

All coefficients were statistically significant (P b 0.05). The coefficient was significantly higher than the others in its column (P b 0.05) according Olkin's z (Olkin,1967). c The coefficient was significantly higher than the others in its row (P b 0.05) according Olkin's z (Olkin,1967). a

b

3.6. Correlations with SCL-90-R All correlations at the subscale level between AQ12 and SCL-90-R were moderate (Table 7). The coefficients were compared and two interesting outcomes emerged. Firstly, all SCL-90-R subscales correlated substantially higher (0.26–0.41) with AQ12 "Hostility" than with the other three AQ12 subscales. Regarding the opposite comparison, the correlations of the AQ12 with the SCL90-R “Hostility” (0.26 to 0.37) were significantly higher compared to the ones with the remaining eight SCL-90-R subscales (Olkin's z for comparing dependent correlation coefficients, P b 0.001 in all cases). Interestingly, a “Hostility-cross” pattern (Table 7) emerged which does not include the two “Hostility” subscales. Regarding the AQ12, “Hostility” correlated higher with “Depression” (r = 0.42, P b 0.001). With respect to SCL-90-R, “Hostility” correlated lower with

Table 6 Differences in means of AQ12 scores between genders in samples 1 and 3. Mean difference between males and females a

Sample 1 Physical (General population from Athens, Verbal nmales = 143, nfemales = 164) Anger Hostility Total Sample 3 Physical (Drug dependent individuals, Verbal nmales = 127, nfemales = 33) Anger Hostility Total a

Note: in that order.

Diff.

t

P

1.00 0.65 0.59 −0.24 2.00 2.04 −0.27 −1.30 −1.10 −0.62

3.43 2.53 2.08 − 0.86 2.69 3.21 − 0.65 − 2.66 − 2.24 − 0.45

0.001 0.012 0.038 0.390 0.007 0.002 0.516 0.009 0.026 0.655

the homonymous AQ12 subscale than the other three AQ12 subscales. 4. Discussion The initial Buss and Perry (1992) AQ29 and the counterpart hierarchical model provided an inadequate fit to our data in terms of both absolute and relative fit CFA measures. On the contrary, the Bryant and Smith (2001) revised model (model f) provided the best fit as well as its corresponding hierarchical model (g). The above results were replicated in three dissimilar samples of Greek adults. Despite the reduction in the number of the items, the internal consistency of the AQ12 remained satisfactory, providing evidence that the revised model by Bryant and Smith should be implemented in the Greek population. Multiple groups CFA did not reveal substantial discrepancies in the loadings among samples or genders. On the assumption of metric invariance, comparisons were carried out between the scores. The AQ12 scores were substantially higher in the third sample. This fact indicates the existence of augmented aggressive personality traits in individuals facing problems related to substance abuse. The association between substance abuse and aggressiveness is undoubtedly complex, but a series of investigations with first graders revealed that boys who were identified by teachers/peers as more aggressive are more likely to use drugs in the future (Kellam et al., 1980, 1982, 1983, 1989). Early aggressive behaviour was found predictive of later substance abuse (Moffitt, 1993) and conduct disorder symptoms have been observed to begin some years before regular

38

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39

drug use (Young et al., 1995). In conclusion, there is evidence suggesting that aggressive personality traits may predate addictive behaviour. Regarding age, even though a negative relationship was found with aggression (in the conscripts' sample), its magnitude was low and not replicated in the other samples, and hence a substantial age effect is not apparent. With respect to the gender effect, males scored higher than females in “Physical aggression” in samples 1 and 3. This is consistent with most studies that have utilized the AQ. In contrast, no clear pattern emerged when analyzing gender effects on the other three aggression subscales. All nine SCL-90-R subscales were preferentially correlated with the AQ12 “Hostility” subscale rather than with the other three aggression subscales in accordance with Morren and Meesters (2002). Specifically, the highest correlations of the AQ12 “Hostility” subscale emerged with the SCL-90-R “Depression” and “Interpersonal sensitivity” subscales. This is intuitive since the AQ12 “Hostility” subscale includes items mostly reflecting depressive traits, suspiciousness and bitterness. On the other hand, the AQ12 subscales are more correlated with SCL-90-R “Hostility” rather than with the other eight SCL-90-R subscales. This finding is also makes intuitive sense, since the SCL-90-R "Hostility" items reflect mostly anger and physical aggression. This would explain additionally why the two homonymous subscales are not highly inter-correlated. Conclusively, these results provide evidence for content validity for both the AQ12 and SCL-90-R questionnaires. With reference to the limitations of the present study, no test-retest analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the AQ. Another limitation concerns the lack of further evaluation of convergence and discriminant validity. Finally, even though the Bryant and Smith (2001) revised model had a reasonably close fit to our data we acknowledge the need for a model with improved fit. The Greek version of the AQ12 had satisfactory properties and thus can be considered a valuable instrument in the assessment of aggressive behaviour. References Ahmad, K., 2004. Violence prevention receives international attention. Lancet 363, 220. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 411–423. Arbuckle, J.L., 2003. Amos 5.0 update to the Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago. Bentler, P.M., 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238–246.

Bentler, P.M., Bonett, D.G., 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588–606. Bernstein, I.H., Gesn, P.R., 1997. On the dimensionality of the Buss/ Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35, 563–568. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., 1989. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioural Research 24, 445–455. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park C.A., pp. 136–162. Bryant, F.B., Smith, B.D., 2001. Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 35, 138–167. Buss, A.F., Durkee, A., 1957. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology 21, 343–349. Buss, A.F., Perry, M., 1992. The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 452–459. Coccaro, E.F., Harvey, P.D., Kupsaw-Lawrence, E., Herbert, J.L., Bernstein, D.P., 1991. Development of neuropharmacologically based behavioral assessments of impulsive aggressive behavior. Journal of Neuropsychiatry 3, 44–51. Collani, G., Werner, R., 2005. Self-related and motivational constructs as determinants of aggression. An analysis and validation of a German version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1631–1643. Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the interval structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334. Derogatis, L.R., 1993. Symptom Checklist-90-R, SCL-90-R. Computer Systems Inc., Minneapolis. Diamond, P.M., Wang, E.W., Buffington-Vollum, J., 2005. Factor structure of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) with mentally ill male prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 32, 546–564. Donias, S., Karastergiou, A., Manos, N., 1991. Standardization of the Symptom Check-List-90-R rating scale in a Greek population. Psychiatriki 2, 42–48. Dziuban, C.D., Shirkey, E.C., 1974. When is correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Psychological Bulletin 81, 358–361. Fossati, A., Di Ceglie, A., Acquarini, E., Barratt, E.S., 2001. Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) in non clinical subjects. Journal of Clinical Psychology 57, 815–828. Garcia-Leon, A., Reyes, G.A., Vila, J., Perez, N., Robles, H., Ramos, M., 2002. The Aggression Questionnaire: a validation study in student samples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 5, 45–53. Harris, J.A., 1995. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Aggression Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33, 991–993. Hoelter, J.W., 1983. The analysis of covariance structures: goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research 11, 325–344. Huesmann, L.R., Efron, L.D., 1992. Childhood aggression and adult criminality. In: McCord, J. (Ed.), Facts, Frameworks and Forecasts: Advances in Criminological Theory. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 137–156. Huesmann, L.R., Efron, L.D., Lefkowitz, M.M., Walder, L.O., 1984. Stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology 20, 1120–1134. Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., 1984. LISREL-VI User's Guide, 3rd ed., Scientific Software, Mooresville.

S. Vitoratou et al. / Psychiatry Research 168 (2009) 32–39 Kellam, S.G., Ensminger, M.E., Simon, M.B., 1980. Mental health in first grade and teenage drug, alcohol and cigarette use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 5, 273–304. Kellam, S.G., Stevenson, D.L., Rubin, B.R., 1982. How specific are the early predictors of teenage drug use? National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph, Series 43, 329–334. Kellam, S.G., Brown, C.H., Fleming, J.P., 1983. Relationship of firstgrade social adaptation to teenage drinking, drug-use, and smoking. Digest of Alcoholism Theory & Application 2, 20–24. Kellam, S.G., Ialongo, N., Brown, H., Laudolff, J., Mirsky, A., Anthony, B., Ahearn, M., Anthony, J., Edelsohn, G., Dolan, L., 1989. Attention problems in first grade and shy and aggressive behaviours as antecedents to late heavy or inhibited substance use. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph, Series 95, 368–369. Maxwell, J.P., 2007. Development and validation of a Chinese version of the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 1–11. Meesters, C., Muris, P., Bosma, H., Schouten, E., Beuving, S., 1996. Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Aggression Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy 34, 839–843. Moffitt, T.E., 1993. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 100, 674–701. Morren, M., Meesters, C., 2002. Validation of the Dutch version of the Aggression Questionnaire in adolescent male offenders. Aggressive Behaviour 28, 87–96. Moyer, K.E., 1968. Kinds of aggression and their physiological basis. Communications in Behavioral Biology 2, 65–87. Nakano, K., 2001. Psychometric evaluation on the Japanese adaptation of the Aggression Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy 39, 853–858.

39

Olkin, I., 1967. Correlations revisited. In: Stanley, J.C. (Ed.), Improving Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 102–128. Olweus, D., 1979. Stability of aggressive reaction patterns in males: a review. Psychological Bulletin 86, 852–875. Pedhazur, E.J., Schmelkin, L.P., 1991. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Pulkkinen, L., Pitkanen, T., 1993. Continuities in aggressive behaviour from childhood to adulthood. Aggressive Behaviour 19, 249–263. Stefanis, N.C., Smyrnis, N., Avrampoulos, D., Evdokimidis, I., Ntzoufras, I., Stefanis, C.N., 2004. Factorial composition of self rated schizotypal traits amongst young males undergoing military training. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30, 335–350. Tsorbatzoudis, H., 2006. Psychometric evaluation of the Greek version of the Aggression Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills 102, 703–718. Van de Vijver, F., Hampleton, R.K., 1996. Translating tests: some practical guidelines. European Psychologist 1, 89–99. Williams, T.Y., Boyd, J.C., Cascardi, M.A., Poythress, N., 1996. Factor structure and convergent validity of the Aggression Questionnaire in an offender population. Psychological Assessment 8, 398–403. Young, S.E., Mikulich, S.K., Goodwin, M.B., Hardy, J., Martin, C.L., Zoccolillo, M.S., Crowley, T.J., 1995. Treated delinquent boys' substance use: onset, pattern, relationship to conduct and mood disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 37, 149–162.

Factorial composition of the Aggression Questionnaire: A multi-sample ...

Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss-Perry. Aggression ... Aggression is a potential predictive factor of later cri-.

203KB Sizes 0 Downloads 174 Views

Recommend Documents

Factorial composition of the Aggression Questionnaire ...
c Department of Statistics, University of Economics and Business, Patision 76, .... Derogatis, 1993; Donias et al., 1991) was also admin- ... The above findings support the existence ... the sample size of the females' group (N= 33) was small.

factorial-of-any-number.pdf
cin>>num;. int val = num;. if(num

Using Factorial Experiments to Evaluate the Effect of ...
On the automatic evolution of computer programs and its applications. Morgan Kaufmann ... netic Programming III, (eds.) Langdon, OíReilly ... StatLib (1999), Online Statistical resources library at the Department of Statistics, Carneige.

Nitrogen isotopic composition of the MORB mantle: A ...
Jan 3, 2004 - Table 1. Statistics of the Literature MORB Nitrogen and Argon Data From Vacuum ..... Triple Junction Indian Ocean MORB: Implications for.

Learning the Fusion of Audio and Video Aggression ...
aggression using a multimodal system, given multiple unimodal features. ... a lot, making a lot of noise, not showing the ticket to the conductor, disturbing the ... classifier has a good performance in predicting the multimodal label given the ...

pdf-1573\the-social-psychology-of-aggression-2nd-edition-social ...
... apps below to open or edit this item. pdf-1573\the-social-psychology-of-aggression-2nd-edit ... cial-psychology-a-modular-course-by-barbara-krahe.pdf.

The Philosophy of Composition
He first involved his hero in a web of difficulties, forming the ... the tone at all points, tend to the development of the intention. 2. There is a .... refrain, the division of the poem into stanzas was, of course, a corollary: the refrain forming

the role of larval cases in reducing aggression and cannibalism ...
Abstract: Larvae of wetland caddisflies supplement their detrital diets with animal material. In some species this supplement is obtained by preying on other caddisflies. In this study, we conducted a series of laboratory experiments to a) compare in

Multisample Preparation Methods for the Solvent-free ...
Nov 20, 2006 - Besides the time savings achieved by a single ... These methods were shown to provide high-quality mass spectra for various synthetic polymer ...

Candidate!Questionnaire!
Indiana'currently'funds'vouchers'for'private'and'parochial'schools'and' ... The'Center'for'Education'and'Career'Innovation'costs'taxpayers'an'excess'of'3'million ...

The Social Phobia Diagnostic Questionnaire
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental. Disorders ... predictive power of the ADSDI, ASQ, SPQ,. Mini-SPIN ... reliability, and positive predictive power. To.

The Social Phobia Diagnostic Questionnaire
additional support for its validity. The use of this questionnaire may reduce ..... Therapy, Miami, FL, November 1998. Newman, M. G., Zuellig, A. R., Kachin, K. E., ...

A Workbook to Overcome Anger and Aggression Using ...
Do you ever feel so frustrated with school, friends, parents, and life in general ... A Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Workbook on Anger Management for Young.

The Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire
This cluster of items shows that although Co-orientation forms a small part ...... meaning system. In: Canary DJ,. Stafford L, eds. Communication and. Relational ...

Method of motion-picture composition
As an illustration of an application of this invention, it is .... the desired background, making a positive. 'therefrom .... projected picture by-creating on said screen '.

The VARK Questionnaire - portuguese.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... The VARK Questionnaire - portuguese.pdf. The VARK Questionnaire - portuguese.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying The VARK Questionnaire - portuguese.pdf.