TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 1: Student Achievement Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905)

Reading

Mathematics

Writing

Social Studies

Science

Total

# at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

32,410

+

27,516

+

7,204

+

12,487

+

6,591

=

86,208

Total Tests

49,329

+

41,099

+

11,796

+

17,824

+

9,513

=

129,561

Index 1 Score (Target=55)

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

Index Points

67

67 67

Page 1 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 1: Student Achievement Data Table FORT WORTH ISD (220905)

2014 STAAR Performance

All Students

African American

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

Special Ed

Econ Disadv

ELL

All Subjects

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

67%

56%

67%

85%

72%

64%

73%

75%

49%

64%

56%

86,208 129,561

16,445 29,616

55,672 82,566

11,279 13,315

146 202

1,368 2,130

106 145

1,192 1,583

5,401 11,095

67,205 105,710

18,414 33,018

66%

56%

66%

85%

68%

58%

65%

75%

49%

63%

55%

32,410 49,329

6,299 11,299

20,898 31,524

4,204 4,955

50 74

490 840

36 55

433 581

2,050 4,224

25,423 40,259

7,152 12,960

67%

53%

69%

84%

79%

69%

74%

72%

51%

64%

62%

27,516 41,099

5,030 9,518

18,126 26,168

3,475 4,161

48 61

430 626

31 42

376 521

1,827 3,607

21,957 34,150

7,338 11,920

61%

51%

61%

80%

45%

68%

73%

76%

43%

58%

49%

7,204 11,796

1,378 2,685

4,587 7,520

994 1,239

9 20

125 184

8 11

103 136

443 1,035

5,680 9,875

1,689 3,432

70%

61%

70%

88%

81%

67%

92%

84%

49%

67%

51%

12,487 17,824

2,484 4,059

7,942 11,347

1,616 1,827

22 27

202 303

23 25

198 236

776 1,600

9,559 14,313

1,907 3,760

69%

61%

69%

87%

85%

68%

67%

75%

48%

64%

35%

6,591 9,513

1,254 2,055

4,119 6,007

990 1,133

17 20

121 177

8 12

82 109

305 629

4,586 7,113

328 946

Reading

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

Mathematics

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

Writing

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

Science

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

Social Studies

Percent of Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Number of Tests # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallest ethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 2 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 2: Student Progress Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Overall Progress All Students

African American

Hispanic

Reading

76

69

Mathematics

73

65

STAAR Weighted Progress Rate

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

Special Ed

ELL

Total Points

Maximum Points

81

65

68

80

73

82

756

2000

73

85

85

79

65

83

766

2000

1522

4000

White

American Indian

79

83

74

84

Total Index 2 Score (Target = 16)

38

Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 3 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 2: Student Progress Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Reading Progress African American

Hispanic

28,321

6,036

18,584

2,684

37

622

34

323

2,151

9,405

16,837

3,323

11,265

1,715

24

299

18

193

1,271

5,724

4,834

828

3,316

509

6

107

5

63

299

1,993

% Met or Exceeded Progress

59

55

61

64

65

48

53

60

59

61

% Exceeded Progress

17

14

18

19

16

17

15

20

14

21

76

69

79

83

81

65

68

80

73

82

STAAR Weighted Progress Rate Number of Tests # Met or Exceeded Progress # Exceeded Progress

Reading Weighted Progress Rate

White

American Indian

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

All Students

Mathematics Progress

Two or More Races

African American

Hispanic

34,039

7,002

23,015

3,013

42

556

33

377

2,429

11,454

19,129

3,706

12,936

1,882

22

329

20

234

1,283

6,650

5,803

821

4,091

665

9

144

8

65

280

2,864

% Met or Exceeded Progress

56

53

56

62

52

59

61

62

53

58

% Exceeded Progress

17

12

18

22

21

26

24

17

12

25

73

65

74

84

73

85

85

79

65

83

Number of Tests # Met or Exceeded Progress # Exceeded Progress

Mathematics Weighted Progress Rate

White

Asian

Pacific Islander

Special Ed

ELL

All Students

STAAR Weighted Progress Rate

American Indian

Special Ed

ELL

Total Points

Maximum Points

756

2000

Total Points

Maximum Points

766

2000

Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 4 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 2: Student Progress Data Table FORT WORTH ISD (220905) All Students

African American

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

Special Ed

ELL

Reading Number of Tests # Met or Exceeded Progress # Exceeded Progress % Met or Exceeded Progress % Exceeded Progress

28,321 16,837 4,834 59% 17%

6,036 3,323 828 55% 14%

18,584 11,265 3,316 61% 18%

2,684 1,715 509 64% 19%

37 24 6 65% 16%

622 299 107 48% 17%

34 18 5 53% 15%

323 193 63 60% 20%

2,151 1,271 299 59% 14%

9,405 5,724 1,993 61% 21%

Mathematics Number of Tests # Met or Exceeded Progress # Exceeded Progress % Met or Exceeded Progress % Exceeded Progress

34,039 19,129 5,803 56% 17%

7,002 3,706 821 53% 12%

23,015 12,936 4,091 56% 18%

3,013 1,882 665 62% 22%

42 22 9 52% 21%

556 329 144 59% 26%

33 20 8 61% 24%

377 234 65 62% 17%

2,429 1,283 280 53% 12%

11,454 6,650 2,864 58% 25%

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallest ethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 5 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Overall Performance

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

Reading

70

60

74

204

600

Mathematics

75

57

82

214

600

Writing

62

53

65

180

600

Science

73

64

77

214

600

Social Studies

72

66

77

215

600

1027

3000

STAAR Weighted Performance Rate

Total Index 3 Score (Target = 28)

34

Note: For 2014, Weighted Performance Rate is equal to the percent of tests that meet the Phase-in Satisfactory Standard or above plus the percent of tests that meet the Advanced Standard.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 6 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Reading Performance

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

40,111

11,288

31,431

# Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

25,375

6,295

20,873

# Advanced Standard

2,807

462

2,474

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

63

56

66

% Advanced Standard

7

4

8

70

60

74

204

600

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

33,515

9,460

25,722

# Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

21,751

5,018

17,974

# Advanced Standard

3,217

351

2,989

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

65

53

70

% Advanced Standard

10

4

12

75

57

82

214

600

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

9,875

2,685

7,520

180

600

STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Number of Tests

Reading Weighted Performance Rate Mathematics Performance STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Number of Tests

Mathematics Weighted Performance Rate Writing Performance STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

5,680

1,378

4,587

# Advanced Standard

349

47

314

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

58

51

61

% Advanced Standard

4

2

4

62

53

65

Writing Weighted Performance Rate

Note: For 2014, Weighted Performance Rate is equal to the percent of tests that meet the Phase-in Satisfactory Standard or above plus the percent of tests that meet the Advanced Standard. Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 7 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Science Performance

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

14,074

4,035

11,189

9,483

2,478

7,882

# Advanced Standard

819

126

737

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

67

61

70

% Advanced Standard

6

3

7

73

64

77

214

600

Econ Disadv

African American

Hispanic

Total Points

Maximum Points

7,008

2,041

5,940

4,546

1,247

4,088

# Advanced Standard

497

97

489

% Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

65

61

69

% Advanced Standard

7

5

8

72

66

77

215

600

STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

Science Weighted Performance Rate Social Studies Performance STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

Social Studies Weighted Performance Rate

Note: For 2014, Weighted Performance Rate is equal to the percent of tests that meet the Phase-in Satisfactory Standard or above plus the percent of tests that meet the Advanced Standard. Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 8 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Data Table FORT WORTH ISD (220905) African American

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

2013 STAAR Performance - Used for Determining Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity Group(s)

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

All Subjects

Percent of Tests % Phase-in 1 Level II or Above Number of Tests Total Tests

56%

67%

84%

72%

75%

75%

78%

38,059

100,804

19,655

337

2,396

144

1,958

11,369

29,121

5,730

95

665

44

596

11,168

28,407

5,609

90

627

43

592

Reading

Number of Tests Total Tests

Mathematics

Number of Tests Total Tests

2014 STAAR Performance

African American

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

Econ Disadv

Reading

Percent of Tests % Phase-in Satisfactory Standard % Advanced Standard Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard # Advanced Standard Total Tests

56% 4%

66% 8%

85% 25%

68% 15%

60% 19%

68% 23%

75% 16%

63% 7%

6,295 462 11,288

20,873 2,474 31,431

4,203 1,256 4,951

50 11 74

471 148 781

36 12 53

433 92 581

25,375 2,807 40,111

53% 4%

70% 12%

84% 24%

79% 15%

80% 33%

77% 28%

73% 15%

65% 10%

5,018 351 9,460

17,974 2,989 25,722

3,463 982 4,137

48 9 61

389 162 489

30 11 39

375 78 515

21,751 3,217 33,515

Mathematics

Percent of Tests % Phase-in Satisfactory Standard % Advanced Standard Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard # Advanced Standard Total Tests

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallest ethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 9 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Data Table FORT WORTH ISD (220905)

2014 STAAR Performance

African American

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

Two or More Races

Pacific Islander

Econ Disadv

Writing

Percent of Tests % Phase-in Satisfactory Standard % Advanced Standard Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard # Advanced Standard Total Tests

51% 2%

61% 4%

80% 15%

* *

68% 15%

* *

76% 10%

58% 4%

1,378 47 2,685

4,587 314 7,520

994 184 1,239

* * *

125 28 184

* * *

103 14 136

5,680 349 9,875

61% 3%

70% 7%

89% 26%

* *

78% 20%

96% 22%

85% 18%

67% 6%

2,478 126 4,035

7,882 737 11,189

1,615 468 1,822

* * *

184 47 236

** ** **

198 43 233

9,483 819 14,074

61% 5%

69% 8%

88% 31%

* *

76% 22%

* *

76% 20%

65% 7%

1,247 97 2,041

4,088 489 5,940

990 353 1,131

* * *

113 33 148

* * *

82 22 108

4,546 497 7,008

Science

Percent of Tests % Phase-in Satisfactory Standard % Advanced Standard Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard # Advanced Standard Total Tests

Social Studies

Percent of Tests % Phase-in Satisfactory Standard % Advanced Standard Number of Tests # Phase-in Satisfactory Standard # Advanced Standard Total Tests

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallest ethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 10 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Calculation Report FORT WORTH ISD (220905) Overall Performance

Total Points

Score

Weight

STAAR Postsecondary Readiness

37.5

25%

9.4

Graduation Rate

76.3

25%

19.1

Graduation Plan

88.1

25%

22.0

Postsecondary Indicator

54.8

25%

13.7

Index 4 Score (Target=57)

Indicator

64

All Students

African American

Hispanic

16%

26%

White

American Indian

54%

38%

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

52%

47%

40%

Special Ed

ELL

Total Points

Max Points

300.0

800

STAAR Postsecondary Readiness Standard % Meeting Postsecondary Readiness Standard

27%

STAAR Postsecondary Readiness Standard Score

37.5

Graduation Rate 5-year Graduation Rate

83.7%

77.5%

86.3%

85.4%

71.0%

79.3%

78.3%

60.8%

64.8%

687.1

5-year Graduation Rate Score

900 76.3

Graduation Plan Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate

86.6%

82.8%

87.5%

87.0%

93.3%

91.5%

528.7

RHSP/DAP Score

600 88.1

Postsecondary Indicator College-Ready Graduates

50%

37%

50%

68%

54%

70%

Postsecondary Indicator Score

329.0

600 54.8

For more information on Index 4 calculations (annual dropout rate conversions or AEA bonus point calculations) see the 2014 Accountability Manual. Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 11 of 12

August 8, 2014

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2014 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Data Table FORT WORTH ISD (220905) All Students

African American

2014 STAAR Postsecondary Readiness % Meeting Postsecondary 27% Readiness Standard # Meeting Postsecondary 12,578 Readiness Standard Total Students Tested 45,957

Hispanic

White

American Indian

Asian

Pacific Islander

Two or More Races

Special Ed

ELL

16%

26%

54%

38%

52%

47%

40%

n/a

n/a

1,666

7,594

2,773

29

265

20

231

n/a

n/a

10,694

28,932

5,126

76

513

43

572

n/a

n/a

4-Year Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2013 % Graduated 82.1% 76.0% # Graduated 3,507 768 Total in Class 4,273 1,011

84.2% 2,073 2,461

84.7% 522 616

87.5% ** **

75.4% 89 118

* * *

81.0% 47 58

58.5% 199 340

61.5% 235 382

5-Year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2012 % Graduated 83.7% 77.5% 86.3% # Graduated 3,518 734 2,069 Total in Class 4,205 947 2,397

85.4% 568 665

71.0% ** **

79.3% 69 87

* * *

78.3% 54 69

60.8% 217 357

64.8% 350 540

Annual Dropout Rate (Gr 9-12): SY 2012-13 % Dropped Out 2.9% # Dropped Out 598 # of Students 20,438

4.2% 194 4,640

2.6% 320 12,163

2.0% 57 2,800

0.0% 0 52

3.6% 19 521

0.0% 0 20

3.3% 8 242

3.6% 63 1,747

6.2% 103 1,657

Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Graduates: Class of 2013 % RHSP/DAP Graduates 86.6% 82.8% # RHSP/DAP Graduates 3,037 636 # of Graduates 3,507 768

87.5% 1,814 2,073

87.0% 454 522

85.7% ** **

93.3% 83 89

* * *

91.5% 43 47

n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a

Annual RHSP/DAP Graduates: SY 2012-13 % RHSP/DAP Graduates 84.6% # RHSP/DAP Graduates 3,083 # of Graduates 3,646

80.2% 649 809

85.7% 1,848 2,157

85.7% 445 519

75.0% ** **

88.3% 91 103

* * *

87.8% 43 49

n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a

College Ready Graduates: SY 2012-13 % College-Ready Graduates 50% # College-Ready Graduates 1,676 # of Graduates 3,329

37% 268 718

50% 1,002 1,994

68% 321 475

86% ** **

54% 49 91

* * *

70% 30 43

n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one ethnic/race group is masked, then the second smallest ethnic/race group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates the student group is not applicable to Index 4.

TEA Division of Performance Reporting

Page 12 of 12

August 8, 2014

How the numbers were crunched.pdf

There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. How the ...

162KB Sizes 1 Downloads 153 Views

Recommend Documents

The Complex Numbers
there is no real number that, when squared, will result in a negative number. For example,. 25. − is not a real number because there is no real number whose square is .25. −. Square roots of negative numbers do exist. These numbers exist under an

fedora by the numbers - GitHub
The Section of the Presentation. Which Features ... 90%. 100%. Edition Downloads as Percent of Total over Time. Atomic. Cloud. Server (Net) ... Edition + Spins Downloads as Percent of Total over Time. Security. Scientific. Robotics. Jam.

PDF Drug Dealer, MD: How Doctors Were Duped ...
... statistics drawn from public policy, cultural anthropology, and neuroscience, ... medical bureaucracy focused on the bottom line that favors pills, procedures, ...

The Book of Were-Wolves
Definition of Lycanthropy--Marcellus ... Arcadian Legends--Explanation offered ... regarding Natural Phenomena--Thunder, Lightning, and Cloud--The origin of ...

pdf-1434\more-damned-lies-and-statistics-how-numbers-confuse ...
... of the apps below to open or edit this item. pdf-1434\more-damned-lies-and-statistics-how-numbers-confuse-public-issues-1st-first-edition-by-joel-best.pdf.

Catalan Numbers
Nov 26, 2006 - In a grid of n×n squares, how many paths are there of length 2n that lead from ... to the lower right corner that do not touch the diagonal dotted line from ..... Notice that we have used the − sign in place of the usual ± sign in

EPUB Packers by the Numbers: Jersey Numbers and the Players Who ...
So the mishap with the Packers by the Numbers: Jersey Numbers and the Players Who Wore Them first pakistan embassy. ; P Mike Niehl, Packers by the Numbers: Jersey Numbers and the Players Who Wore Them Curtis, 6-6, Sr. Sentences can i just don't want

PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS: BY THE NUMBERS
May 10, 2018 - which today is 3–5% of national health spending. Other services, such as home ... Source: IQVIA, “Outlook for Global Medicines through 2021.

Stop the Numbers Game
Nov 20, 2007 - leads to poor communication and duplication, even while boosting the ... important new line of inquiry or contribute data that leads to a major ...

Dividing Fractions Whole Numbers Mixed Numbers Flow Map.pdf ...
Page 1 of 1. Y Turn the ÷ problem. into a x problem, by. keeping the dividend as. is, changing the sign to. x and taking the. reciprocal of the divisor. Z Multiply. horizontally. numerator x numerator. denominator x denominator. [ (if needed). Simpl

The candidates whose Registration Numbers given ... - gurudeva.com
ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION # HYDERABAD. DEPARTMENTAL TESTS NOVEMBER 2014 SESSION. NOTIFICATION NO.03/2015.

The candidates whose Registration Numbers given ... - gurudeva.com
Website http://www.apspsc.gov.in in addition to the publication in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette which would be considered as authentic Publication for intending ...

Multiplying Fractions Whole Numbers Mixed Numbers Flow Map.pdf ...
Multiplying Fractions Whole Numbers Mixed Numbers Flow Map.pdf. Multiplying Fractions Whole Numbers Mixed Numbers Flow Map.pdf. Open. Extract.

register numbers - Manabadi.com
Nov 30, 2012 - ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION: HYDERABAD ... recruitment to the post of TOWN PLANNING & BUILDING OVERSEER ...

Architecture- Numbers Review - UsingEnglish.com
How would the questions which got the following answers start? eight thousand seven hundred and seven. three hundred and thirteen litres. twelve foot ...