Hydropower, Hydroelectricity and Hydraulic turbine
Wei Zhao Senior Engineer, Energi Tekknik AS Email:
[email protected] Tel:+47-40334263
Content • Hydropower • Hydroelectricity • Hydraulic Turbines • Small Hydro Power Plant in Norway
Hydropower
Hydropower Benefits Renewable:Hydrologic Cycle never stop Clean:Zero release Reliable: It is a fast, flexible, stable power production of materials Inexpensive:the cost per MWh is only 1/3 of fossil and nuclear fuel, less than 1/6 of gas Multipurpose:Flood control,aquaculture industry, inland shipping,municipal water supply, irrigation agriculture and so on.
Abundent: 1/5 of the power in the world
Hydropower Benefits
Hydropower
Hydroelectricity Principle Generating methods
Advantages and disadvantages World hydroelectricty capacity
Hydroelectricity Principle
Generating methods Dams (with reservoirs) • • •
Small dams with night&day regulation Large dams with seasonal storage Pumped-storage: reversible plants for energy storage and night&day regulation according to electricity demand.
Run-of-the river (without reservoirs) Tide: use the daily rise and fall of ocean water due to tides.
Advantages and disadvantages 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Advantages: Flexibility Low power costs Suitability for industrial applications Reduced CO2 emissions: clean Other uses of the reservoir: Irrigation, control floods
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Disadvantages: Ecosystem damage and loss of land Siltation and flow shortage Methane emissions (from decomposition of organic materials in reservoirs) Relocation Failure risks: The Banqiao Dam failure (板桥大坝,河南)in 1975, 26000 people died.
World hydroelectric capacity In 2010, a total capacity of 723 GW in the world, 3190 TWh per year. In 2050, increase to 1700 GW, 5000-5500 TWh per year
China: the largest hydroelectricity producer, 721 TWH in 2010, 17% of the domestic electricity use. Norway: 99% of its electricity from hydroelectric, 122TWH in 2009, 30% of the hydroelectric in the west Europe.
Hydraulic turbines Introduction Classification of Turbines
Choice of Turbines Main Components of Turbines Turbine design (according to my work)
Hydraulic turbines Introduction Hydraulic turbines is a machine that directly convert the hydraulic power in a water fall to mechanical power on the machine shaft.
Working parameter
Head:Hn, Hg Discharge:Q Power: P Rotational speed:n Efficiency:η
Hydraulic turbines Introduction Gross head: Hgr=Zres-Ztw Net head: Hn=Hgr-HL
Available output: P=ρgQHn Efficiency: ηh=PT/ρgQHn
Hydraulic turbines Classification of Turbines Francis turbine Reaction turbine (Full turbine) Both pressre and kinetic energy
Hydraulic turbines
Kaplan turbine
Bulb turbine
Mechanical energy
Only kinetic energy
Impluse turbine (Partial turbine)
Pelton turbine
Turgo turbine
Hydraulic turbines Pelton turbine Invested by Lester Allan Pelton in 1870s Head ranges higher than 750m Widely used in Norway
Hydraulic turbines Francis turbine Developed by James B. Francis in 1849 Head ranges:15-700m H<300m, low head FR H>300m, high head FR η>95% Widely used in China
Hydraulic turbines Three Gorges runner
Head: 80.6m Speed: 75rpm Power: 710 MW 32 units
Hydraulic turbines Kaplan turbine Invented by Austrian Professor Viktor Kaplan in 1913 Propeller blades Head ranges 10-70m Fixed runner blades Adjustable runner blades
Hydraulic turbines Bulb turbine Head ranges: low heads up to 30m due to run-off-river type of the operation
Hydraulic turbines Pump-turbine Pump: consume energy to perform mechanical work by moving the fluid. Turbine: extracts energy from the fluid flow and converts it to a useful work
7 pumped storage power plants in Norway
Hydraulic turbines Choice of turbines
Reduced paramters are values relative to the highest velocity that can be obtained if all the nergy is vonverted to kinetic energy
Speed number: dimensionless and all geometrically similar turbines have the same speed number *
*
*
Q
Hydraulic turbines Choice of turbines Rule of Thumb
Ω<0.2
Pelton turbines
0.2< Ω<1.5
Francis turbines
Ω>1.5
Kaplan turbines
Hydraulic turbines Choice of turbines
High head, low flow
Intermediate head and flow
Low head, high flow
Main Components of Turbine
Spiral casing Stay vanes Guide vanes Runner Draft tube
Main Components of Turbine Spiral casing The spiral casing will distribute the water equally around the stay vanes. The flow has to be uniform into the stay vanes in order to achieve a uniform flow into the runner
Main Components of Turbine Stay vanes The main purpose of using stay vanes is to keep the spiral casing together. Dimensions have to be given due to the stresses in the stay vanes The vanes should be designed so that the flow is not disturbed by them
Main Components of Turbine Guide vanes Main function: adjust the turbine load
Main Components of Turbine Runner
Traditional runner
X-Blade runner
Main Components of Turbine Draft tube The function: decelerate the water and recove the kinetic energy Elbow draft tube
Conical tube
Flaring tube
Straight cone
Bend
Diffuser
Campaniform tube
Main Components of Turbine Draft tube
Francis turbine Velocity triangle
Francis turbine Euler’s turbine equation P T
P Q (u1cu1 u2cu 2 )
Output power from the runner
P Q g Hn
Available hydraulic power
Francis turbine Hydraulic efficiency
Q (u1cu1 u2cu 2 ) Q g Hn
u1cu1 u2cu 2 g Hn cu 2 0
Best efficiency point
NPSH(Net Positive suction head) Bernoulli’s equation Cavitation
Atmospheric pressure head
h2 ha H s ( Suction head
NPSH R a
c 22 2g
J ) hva
NPSHR 2 m2
water vapor pressure head
For 0.53
cm2 2 u22 NPSH R 1.12 0.055 2g 2g
For 0.53
cm2 2 u22 NPSH R 1.12 (0.00426 0.0957) 2g 2g
2 2
c u b 2g 2g
NPSH R ha hva H s NPSH A Suction head H s ha hva NPSH R
Francis Runner Design Design requirements (Hn,Qn,P and η)
Main dimension design Build SP, SV,GV and DT Geometry (SolidWorks) Opitimization design (BladeGen) Generate mesh (ICEM) Generate mesh (TurboGrid)
3D CFD analysis (CFX)
No
Meet the requirement ? Yes
Finish first step of the hydraulic design No
Model test Meet the requirement ?
Yes
The Hydraulic design end
Francis Runner Design Main dimension design Dimension of the outlet Speed Dimension of the inlet
Optimization design in BladeGen Meridional view
Blade angle view
Auxiliary view
Thickness view
Optimization design in BladeGen Auxiliary view Meridional view
Blade angle view
Thickness view
Francis Runner Design
Francis Runner Design Mesh Generation
TurboGrid ATM mesh
Francis Runner Design CFD simulation Boundary conditions: 1. Mass flow rate inlet with the vector direction 2. Non-slip wall 3. Static pressure outlet Flow state: steady Turbulence model: SST k-ω
Guide vane
Inlet Periodic boundaries
Outlet
Interface Runner blade
CFD results for Best efficiency point
CFD results for Valken runner Cross flow
CFD results for Best efficiency point
Small Hydro Power in Norway Small hydro (1-10MW) development in Norway • 1920s through1940s: 1800 hydro plants operation with a capacity of less than 1MW • 1978-1982, the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), a potential of 10 MWH of generation from hydro plants between 1 and 10 MW. • 1990, 100 plants in operation • 1990-2000, the Norwegain goverment finaced two major hydro research and programs • 2002, a five-year plan implemented by NG, 4 million MWH by 2010
In 2008
Small Hydro Power in Norway Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) • Licensing • Finacing • Construction • Operation
Norwegian Association for Small Hydro • Established in 2001 by small hydro project owner • with support by NVE •Organize training courses
Small Turbine Partner AS (STP) • Tinfos AS • E-CO Vannkraft AS • Østfold Energi AS • Akershus Kraft AS • Energy Future Invest AS • Employees
Small Hydro Power in Norway
Small Hydro Power Plant
Reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroelectricity http://www.alstom.com/power/renewables/hydro/hydro-turbines/bulb-turbines/
http://www.energi-teknikk.no/en/prosjekter/prosjektkart/ ‘Pumper & Turbiner’, Professor Hermod Brekke, Vannkraftlaboratoriet NTNU 2013 ‘The lecture of Turbomachinery’, Professor Ole G. Dahlhaug, EPT, NTNU,2011 ‘The lecture of Hydraulic design of hydraulic turbines’, Associate professor Ruofu Xiao, CAU, 2008
‘Mechanical Equipment’, Professor Arne Kjølle, NTNU, 2001
The end