Jets and open heavy flavors in heavy-ion collisions Guang-You Qin
秦广友 Central China Normal University (CCNU)
A symposium on future RHIC and LHC Physics on the occasion of celebrating Miklos Gyulassy's second retirement
September 25-26, 2015, Wuhan, China
Extraction of jet transport coefficients
interaction strength
RHIC energy scan
JET Collaboration, PRC 2014, arXiv:1312.5003
LHC higher energy
McGill-AMY: GYQ, Ruppert, Gale, Jeon, Moore, Mustafa, PRL 2008 HT-BW: Chen, Hirano, Wang, Wang, Zhang, PRC 2011 HT-M: Majumder, Chun, PRL 2012 GLV-CUJET: Xu, Buzzatti, Gyulassy, arXiv: 1402.2956 MARTINI-AMY: Schenke, Gale, Jeon, PRC 2009 NLO SYM: Zhang, Hou, Ren, JHEP 2013
Radiative and collisional energy loss McGill-AMY rad & coll.
GYQ, Ruppert, Gale, Jeon, Moore, Mustafa, PRL 2008
Wicks, Horowitz, Djordjevic, Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys. A784 (2007) 426-442
Both collisional and radiative contributions are controlled by jet transport coefficients
Elastic collisions & parton transport coefficients
•
In the multiple soft scattering limit and keeping up to the second order in a momentum (gradient) expansion, one gets longitudinal drag, longitudinal diffusion & transverse diffusion
f 1 2 1 2 D L1 D L2 2 DT 2lq f (L ,lq ,lq ) 2 2 L l l q q d lq2 4sC R q DT 2 dy F ( 0 ) F ( y ) 2 dL Nc 1 2 2 GYQ, Majumder, PRC 2013; GYQ, Majumder, PRC 2015
Medium-induced radiation •
•
Single gluon emission – –
Multiple-soft-scattering approximation (BDMPS-Z, ASW, AMY) Few-hard-scattering approximation (DGLV, HT)
–
dN g 2 s q 2 t P(x ) 4 sin 2 dxdk dt k 2 f
HT:
Multiple gluon emission –
Poisson convolution (BDMPS/ASW/DGLV)
P(E )
n 0
–
Ng
n dI( ) E d n! i 1 d
n
1
i i
BDMPS-Z: Baier-Dokshitzer-MuellerPeigne-Schiff-Zakharov ASW: Amesto-Salgado-Wiedemann AMY: Arnold-Moore-Yaffe DGLV: Djordjevic-Gyulassy-Levai-Vitev HT: Wang-Guo-Majumder
Transport equations (AMY, etc)
df( p ,t ) dt –
e
dkf( p k ,t )
d( p k ,k ) d( p ,k ) dkf ( p ,t ) dkdt dkdt
mDGLAP evolution equation (HT)
D~(z ,Q 2 ) s 2 ln Q 2
dy 2 ~( z ,Q 2 ) P ( y ) d K ( , q , y , Q ) D y y
Effect of longitudinal scattering on medium-induced gluon radiation •
Medium-induced radiative gluon spectrum with both transverse and longitudinal momentum exchange:
Guo, Wang, PRL 2000; NPA 2001
•
In the small y approximation, the leading contribution from drag and diffusion to medium-induced gluon radiation is:
Y dN g s P(y ) D L1 D L2 2DT 2 C dY 2 2 cos A yq (yq )2 2 l2 dydl2 l2 f med
Unlike (transverse) momentum broadening which induced additional gluon radiation, the longitudinal drag tends to reduce the medium-induced radiation Le Zhang, D. Hou, GYQ, in prep.
Full jets in heavy-ion collisions Fully-reconstructed jets are expected to provide more detailed information than single hadron observables
AJ
E J ,1 E J ,2 , 1 2 E J ,1 E J ,2
Strong modification of momentum imbalance & largely-unchanged angular distribution => significant energy loss experienced by the away-side subleading jets
Full jet shower evolution in medium ELrad ,out ELrad ,in
E Lcoll
R
E gcoll
E gbroad
Not only the interaction of the leading hard parton with the medium constituents, but also the fate of radiated shower partons as well dfg(,k 2 ,t ) fg dN gmed 1 2 eˆ qˆ k fg dt 4 ddk 2dt
Ejet = Ein + Elost = Ein + Eout(radiation) + Eout(broadening) + Eth(collision) GYQ, Muller, PRL, 2011; Casalderrey-Solana, Milhano, Wiedemann, JPG 2011; Young, Schenke, Jeon, Gale, PRC, 2011; Dai, Vitev, Zhang, PRL 2013; Wang, Zhu, PRL 2013; Blaizot, Iancu, Mehtar-Tani, PRL 2013; etc.
Energy asymmetry of dijets and -jets di-jets
Young, Schenke, Jeon, Gale, PRC, 2011
He, Vitev, Zhang, PRC 2011
GYQ, Muller, PRL, 2011
-jets
Dai, Vitev, Zhang, PRL 2013
Wang, Zhu, PRL 2013
GYQ, EPJC 2014
Simulating full jet evolution in medium
Solve 3D (energy & transverse momentum) evolution for shower partons inside the jet Include both collisional (via drag and diffusion) and all radiative/splitting processes
Jet energy loss (different contributions)
Ningbo Chang, GYQ, in preparation
Jet shape modification (different contributions)
Ningbo Chang, GYQ, in preparation
Dijet & -jet asymmetry, jet RAA, jet shape
Elastic & radiative energy loss for heavy quarks • •
At low pT, heavy quark energy loss is more dominated by collisional component Langevin approach has been widely utilized at RHIC for heavy quark evolution (Moore, Teaney, PRC 2005; He, Fries, Rapp, PRC 2012; Young, Schenke, Jeon, Gale, PRC 2012 …)
•
Einstein relation (detailed balance):
•
At high pT, , heavy quark energy loss is more dominated by radiative component (similar to light flavors), necessary to include it at the LHC
•
We utilize higher twist (HT) E-loss formalism (Guo, Wang, PRL 2000; Majumder, PRC 2012)
•
HT model for heavy quark radiative energy loss (Zhang, Wang, Wang, PRL 2004)
•
Include gluon radiation contribution as a recoil force exerted on the heavy quark
dp D p fg dt
Short summary of our heavy flavor model • Soft sector (bulk matter): – Initial conditions: Glauber/KLN-CGC for energy/entropy density distribution – Space-time evolution: (2+1)-d viscous hydrodynamics (OSU) – Hadronization: cooper-Frye formula => hadron gas
• Hard Sector (heavy quark): – Initial conditions: Glauber for space distribution and pQCD for momentum distribution (shadowing included) – Heavy quark evolution in QGP: Langevin approach with collisional and radiative energy loss – Hadronization: fragmentation plus coalescence/recombination => heavy mesons
• Heavy mesons evolution in hadron gas: UrQMD model Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2013; PRC 2015
Heavy quark energy loss in QGP (LHC)
• • •
•
QGP medium: (2+1)-D viscous hydrodynamics (OSU) Diffusion coefficient D=6/(2πT), i.e., qhat ~ 2 GeV2/fm at T~350 MeV Collisional energy loss dominates at low energy, while radiative energy loss dominates at high energy The crossing point is larger for bottom than charm quarks due to the mass effect Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2013; JPG 2013; PRC 2015
Heavy meson RAA after QGP (LHC)
• • •
Collisional energy loss dominates at low pT; radiative energy loss dominates at high pT Nuclear shadowing effect leads to a decrease in D meson RAA at low pT, and a mild increase at high pT Fragmentation is sufficient to describe D meson RAA above 8 GeV, but at intermediate pT, recombination becomes important Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2013; PRC 2015
RAA and v2 of D mesons at RHIC
•
Recombination enhances RAA at intermediate pT & produces the bump structure
•
Nuclear shadowing effect leads to a decrease in D meson RAA at low pT, and a mild increase at high pT
•
Recombination increases v2 Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2013; PRC 2015
Heavy meson v2 after QGP (LHC)
• • •
Larger v2 from recombination Different geometries and flow behaviors of the QGP do not significantly influence the overall suppression (not shown), but they may have large impact on heavy flavor v2 KLN-CGC provides larger eccentricity for QGP than Glauber, producing larger D meson v2 Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2013; PRC 2015
Effect of hadronic interaction
Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2015
Mass dependence of RAA (LHC)
Cao, GYQ, Bass, PRC 2015
• • •
A good description of Npart dependence of D meson RAA Using the same diffusion coefficient for c and b quarks, we obtain a reasonable description of non-prompt J/ψ RAA We observe the mass ordering of heavy quark energy loss: ΔEc> ΔEb
DDbar momentum & angular correlations
energy loss
xT=0.2-0.4
xT=0.4-0.6
momentum broadening
xT=0.6-0.8
xT=0.8-1.0
The trigger D/Dbar is along the +y direction Cao, GYQ, Bass, arXiv: 1505.01869
Summary • Radiative and collisional processes – play different roles in different probes (light flavor partons, full jet energy loss and shape function, heavy quarks)
• Jet transport coefficients – control both collisional and radiative contributions – carry much detailed information about the quarkgluon medium (at various scales) – Precise determination of jet transport coefficients (and the full distribution of momentum exchange)
Congratulations to Miklos!