Evaluation: How Much Evaluation is Enough?

Less and More Min Chen, University of Oxford

Evaluation: How Much Evaluation is Enough?

Less and More Min Chen, University of Oxford



 

Originality, Rigor, and Significance



Peer judgement

 o e.g., review, publications, presentation, citation



Relation to prior work o e.g., fundamental theories, algorithms, experiment results, widely-accepted models, wisdoms



Evidence o e.g., mathematical reasoning, engineering and deployment, experiment design and execution and analysis



Contemplation o e.g., discussions (short-term), usability studies (medium term), and comprehensive surveys (longterm).



Usability





 

Perceptual, cognitive and social aspects

a usability study







see: Munzner’s nested model, 2009  difficult to present in a research paper 

Waterfall model



   

  



Making observation Facilitating external memorization Stimulating hypotheses Evaluating hypotheses Disseminating knowledge  SAVING TIME see: arXiv:1305.5670



Insight gained



 

An independent and objective conclusion may take decades to obtain

short-term process  “self-certified clinical procedure”  positive conclusion 







Less and More

Evaluation: How Much Evaluation is Enough? Less and More. Min Chen, University of Oxford. Page 2. Evaluation: How Much Evaluation is Enough? Less and More. Min Chen, University of Oxford. Page 3. ▫. ○ Originality, Rigor, and Significance. ▫. ○ Peer judgement o e.g., review, publications, presentation, citation.

967KB Sizes 1 Downloads 273 Views

Recommend Documents

No documents