Current Biology, Volume 18
Supplemental Data
Long-Term Global Trends in Crop Yield and Production Reveal no Current Pollination Shortage but Increasing Pollinator Dependency
Marcelo A. Aizen, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Saul A. Cunningham, and Alexandra M. Klein
S1
Current Biology, Volume 18
S2
Supplemental Experimental Procedures Dataset The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has assembled detailed information on crop cultivation for nearly five decades based on questionnaires sent out annually to member countries. We used the FAO extensive dataset [S1] to compile yearly data, from 1961 to 2006, on production and cultivated area of a total of 87 crops, 52 represented by single species and 35 by two or more taxonomically related species, mostly within the same genus. For instance, “coffee” is represented by three species, including Coffea arabica, C. canephora, and C. libarica. The single and multispecies crops in our dataset (Table S3), collectively accounted for 82.8% of total global food production in the year 2006. These crops were selected on the basis of existing information on their pollinator dependence status in the recent review of Klein et al. [S2]. Rather than compiling data at the country or global level, for each crop we used the values on production and area reported separately for the developed and developing world in the FAO dataset. Considering crop data independently for the developed and developing world is justified because differences in agricultural intensification and socioeconomic and environmental conditions might affect directly both yield and pollinators. On the one hand, more intensified agriculture in the developed world could offset limited fruit and seed numbers or sizes caused by pollinator scarcity, whereas higher rates of deforestation and habitat destruction in the developing world might be increasing pressure on pollinator faunas [S3-S5]. On the other hand, the impact of diseases of honey bees has so far been most apparent in the developed world, with stocks of managed honey bees collapsing in the USA and in some European countries at different times during the last decades, potentially limiting production of many pollinator
Current Biology, Volume 18
S3
dependent crops [S6, S7]. Although these varying factors could balance each other out in their net effect on crop pollination in the developed versus developing world, the comparison is relevant nevertheless for evaluating consistency in trends despite contrasting socioeconomic conditions. According to FAO classification, the developing world includes all the African and Latin American countries, as well as most countries from SE Asia plus China and India. The developed world includes all the European countries, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The USSR was considered by the FAO to be part of the developing world until its dissolution in 1991. After that year, Russia, Ukraine, and the other European ex-Soviet republics were reclassified by FAO and included as part of the developed world, whereas the Asian ex-Soviet republics remained as part of the developing world. This reclassification produced a disruption in the regional temporal trends in total crop production and cultivated area, because USSR agriculture, dominated by Russia and Ukraine, represented about 9.8% of global crop production by 1991. For the sake of consistency and because the USSR showed similar trends to the rest of Europe until 1991, we considered all the former Soviet republics as part of the developed world for the entire 1961-2006 period. Therefore, we added to the annualized data from the developed world (and subtracted from the developing world) the production and cultivated area of each crop in the USSR for the period 1961-1991, and of each crop in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan for the period 1992-2006. Pollinator Dependency Crops were categorized according to their dependence on pollinators using Klein et al. (see ref. [S2]; information provided in their electronic supplementary material 1 and 2). Crops were classed as pollinator dependent if pollinators increase the quantity or quality
Current Biology, Volume 18
S4
(i.e., weight) of the fruits or seeds that we consume, and nondependent if the production of the parts that we consume is independent of animal pollination. This second category includes not only wind-pollinated and autogamous crops from which we harvest and consume their fruits or seeds, but also crops that depend on pollinators for sexual reproduction but not for the vegetative parts that we eat (i.e., Klein et al.’s “increase – seed production” and “increase – breeding” categories; [S2]). Where information was available, dependent crops were further classified into two categories, low and high dependence, according to the degree of pollinator dependency. The low dependence category includes those crops in which either fruit or seed number or weight decreases <40% in the absence of pollinators, whereas the high dependence category includes those crops in which either seed or fruit number or weight decreases >40%. For many crops, such as soybean and sunflower, their pollinator dependence status should be viewed as a consensus status for the whole crop based on existing published information as pollinator dependency can be highly variable among cultivars. For crops including more than one variety or taxonomically related species, the pollinator dependence category reflects the prevailing condition in the group [S2]. Data Analysis Although we assessed temporal trends in the production and cultivated area of crops, our focal variable was yield. For a given crop, yield was calculated by dividing its total production in Metric tonnes (Mt) by its cultivated area in hectares (ha). Considering all the variables in that we could derive from the FAO dataset, yield is the one most likely to be affected by a decline in pollination because it represents a measure of production standardized by area. To compare temporal trends between pollination dependence and worlddevelopment categories, the value of each dependent variable x (i.e., yield, production,
Current Biology, Volume 18
S5
or area) at year t was transformed according to Δxt = 100 ⋅ ( xt − x1961 ) x1961 , where Δxt
represents the percent change of the variable at year t with respect to its value in 1961. For each crop in each region, we estimated the slope β of the linear relationship between relative yield and year (i.e., %/yr). The slope of the linear regression fit, βΔyield, provides an unbiased estimate of the average annual growth rate in relative yield for the underlying population mean despite temporal autocorrelation [S8]. For instance, a slope of 1.6 means that yield increased, on average, by 1.6 %/yr since 1961. Treating the developed and developing world classes separately, we used ANOVA to test for statistical differences in the mean slope among the three dependency categories (i.e., high dependence, low dependence, nondependence) followed by two orthogonal contrasts (i.e., dependence vs. nondependence, and high vs. low dependence). We were concerned that interpretation of this comparison might be difficult because of the existence of many tropical, pollinator dependent crops that are exclusively cultivated in the developing world (e.g., Brazil nut, cocoa beans, oil palm, etc.). Therefore, we also compared the growth rate in relative yield for a common set of 10 important pollinator dependent crops (soybean, sunflower seed, rapeseed, cottonseed, flax, dry bean, buckwheat, apple, citrus, and tomato) and 10 important nondependent crops (wheat, corn, barley, oat, rye, potato, sugar beet, grape, sorghum, and pea). These were selected on the basis that they were the 10 top-ranked crops in each category in terms of cumulative area under cultivation, from 1961 to 2006, in the developed world. Importance was based on cultivated area rather than on production, because different plant parts are harvested from different crops and thus production among crops (in terms of weight) is not strictly comparable. These crops are mostly temperate or subtropical and are also widely cultivated in the developing world. In total, these 10 dependent and 10 nondependent crops accounted for 8.7 and 19.9%,
Current Biology, Volume 18
S6
respectively, of the world’s cropping land in 2006. We used ANOVA to assess the effects of pollinator dependence (dependent vs. nondependent) and region (developed vs. developing) on the annual growth rate in relative yield, βΔyield. We considered crop species as a nested factor within the dependence class and a blocking factor for the comparison between regions. Supplemental References
S1.
FAOSTAT (2007). Data available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/408/default.aspx. Last accessed in January 2008.
S2.
Klein, A.M., Vaissière, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., and Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 303-313.
S3.
Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., and Swift, M.J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277, 504-509.
S4.
Allen, J.C., and Barnes, D.F. (1985). The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Ann. Asoc. Am. Geog. 75, 163-184.
S5.
Jha, S., and Bawa, K.S. (2006). Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 20, 906-912.
S6.
Kearns, C.A., Inouye, D.W., and Waser, N.M. (1998). Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 83112.
S7.
Oldroyd, B.P. (2007). What's killing American honey bees? PLos Biol. 5, e168.
S8.
Murtaugh, P.A. (2007). Simplicity and complexity in ecological data analysis. Ecology 88, 56-62.
S9.
Freedman, D., Pisani, R., and Purves, R. (1998). Statistics (3rd edn) (New York: Norton).
Current Biology, Volume 18
S7
Supplemental Figure Legends
Figure S1. Pollinator Dependence, Socioeconomic Development and the Annual Growth Rate in Relative Crop Yield Shown are the means (+ 1 SE) of annual growth rate in relative yield (βΔyield) of a subset of 10 pollinator dependent and 10 nondependent crops widely cultivated in temperate and subtropical regions of the developed and developing world. See Table S1 for statistical analysis.
Figure S2. Effects of Level of Pollinator Dependence on the Annual Growth Rate in Relative Crop Yield Shown are the means (+ 1 SE) of annual growth rate in relative yield (βΔyield) for crops grouped in different categories of pollinator dependence (i.e., high dependence, low dependence, and nondependence) for the developed and developing world. The number of crops included in each category is indicated between parentheses. The gray dot in the “developed world” panel indicates the mean value observed after the exclusion of the Cucurbita spp. complex (which includes pumpkin, squash, gourd, and zucchini) from the high dependence category. This crop complex may be considered an outlier because it experienced a relative yield growth rate of ∼17 %/yr in the developed world, >5 SD away from the mean of the 70 sample values from that region (see ref. [S9]) and surpassing by >60% the yield rate of any other crop in the whole dataset. See Table S2 for statistical analyses.
Current Biology, Volume 18
S8
Table S1. Effects of Pollinator Dependence and Socioeconomic Development on the Annual Growth Rate in Relative Yield Source
Df
MS
F
p
1
0.292
0.07
0.79
18
4.302
Development
1
2.160
0.39
0.54
Dependence x Development
1
0.166
0.03
0.86
18
5.488
Dependence Error1
Error2
This analysis was conducted on a subset of 10 pollinator dependent and 10 nondependent crops cultivated in temperate and subtropical regions worldwide. See Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details on crop selection and statistical analysis.
Current Biology, Volume 18
S9
Table S2. Effect of Level of Pollinator Dependence on the Annual Growth Rate in Relative Crop Yield for the Developed and Developing World Developed world Source
Developing world
Df
MS
F
p
Df
MS
F
p
Dependence
2
0.453
0.06
0.93
2
4.257
1.81
0.17
Yes vs. No
1
0.059
0.01
0.93
1
1.156
0.49
0.49
High vs. Low†
1
0.889
0.12
0.73
1
7.788
3.31
0.07
67
7.204
79
2.354
Error
The dependence factor was decomposed in two independent (i.e., orthogonal) contrasts (i.e., dependent vs. nondependent; and within dependent crops, high vs. low dependence). †
If Cucurbita spp., a multispecies crop complex considered an outlier, is excluded from the
highly-dependent group in the developed world, the contrast changes to F1,66=1.30, p=0.26 (see Figure S2).
Current Biology, Volume 18
S10
Table S3. Land Area Cultivated, Production and Yield of Leading Global Crops Classified by their Pollinator Dependence Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence degree
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Production
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Actinidia deliciosa*
Kiwifruit
Yes/ High
0.0
---
0.0
----
0.0
----
0.0
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Amygdalus communis
Almond
Yes/High
592.7
74
128.7
466
660.4
74
97.0
534
1.11
0
0.52
0.75
12
0.68
Cashew nut, and Cashewapple
Yes/High
0.0
---
588.1
590
0.0
----
588.1
741
----
----
----
1.00
22
-0.07
Brazil nut, Para nut, Cream nut
Yes/High
0.0
---
1.8
-19
0.0
----
59.4
25
----
----
----
32.99
55
-0.14
Citrullus lanatus
Watermelon
Yes/High
835.8
-37
1120.2
191
5896.6
64
11968.6
660
7.06
158
3.00
10.68
161
3.81
Cola nitida, C. vera, † C. acuminata
Cola nut, Kola nut
Yes/High
0.0
---
155.0
151
0.0
----
191.5
15
----
----
----
1.24
-54
-2.18
Cucumis melo
Cantaloupe, Melon
Yes/High
163.9
4
464.8
141
2018.5
92
4988.1
383
12.31
84
1.93
10.73
101
1.90
Cucumis sativus
Cucumber, Gherkin
Yes/High
394.9
-3
617.6
247
3770.7
112
5777.9
521
9.55
118
2.55
9.35
79
1.98
Cucurbita maxima, C. mixta, C. moschata, C. pepo
Pumpkin, Squash, Gourd, Marrow, Zucchini
Yes/High
1096.2
-78
402.4
227
3197.5
58
3452.8
362
2.92
609
16.77
8.58
42
0.94
Anacardium occidentale
†
Bertholletia excelsa
†
Current Biology, Volume 18
S11
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Production
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Yield
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Cardamom, Mace, Nutmeg
Yes/High
0.0
---
73.5
204
0.0
----
11.6
582
----
----
----
0.16
124
2.74
Buckwheat
Yes/High
2098.9
-13
2541.3
-64
959.0
47
1519.6
-37
0.46
68
1.37
0.60
75
3.50
Apple
Yes/High
1404.2
18
295.8
957
15139.1
51
1914.6
2040
10.78
28
0.10
6.47
102
1.44
Mangifera indica
Mango
Yes/High
0.3
3197
1275.5
225
0.9
5784
10903.2
180
3.41
78
0.36
8.55
-14
-0.47
Persea americana
Avocado
Yes/High
10.5
439
67.3
393
52.1
661
661.3
342
4.95
41
-0.02
9.83
-10
-0.53
Prunus armeniaca
Apricot
Yes/High
115.5
69
97.9
186
970.0
50
347.6
417
8.40
-11
-0.33
3.55
81
2.29
Prunus avium, Prunus cerasus
Sour cherry, Sweet cherry
Yes/High
72.2
231
21.1
383
1202.9
-2
95.6
623
16.66
-70
-1.61
4.52
50
1.87
Prunus domestica, P. spinosa
Plum
Yes/High
271.0
56
123.2
1304
5333.5
-36
842.5
617
19.68
-59
-1.31
6.84
-49
-1.02
Prunus persica, Persica laevis
Peach, Nectarine
Yes/High
381.6
9
166.7
519
3918.4
51
1248.9
801
10.27
39
0.63
7.49
46
0.50
Pyrus communis
Pear
Yes/High
305.7
-13
192.9
627
4200.5
11
1001.9
1385
13.74
28
0.45
5.19
104
1.86
Rubus idaeus, R. fruiticosus, R. chamaemorus, R. flagellaris, R. trivalis
Raspberry, Blackberry, Cloudberry, Northern dewberry, Southern dewberry
Yes/High
24.8
309
24.5
161
225.4
145
215.1
180
9.07
-40
-1.02
8.80
7
0.13
Elettaria cardamomum, Myristica fragrans
†
Fagopyrum ‡ esculentum Malus domestica
‡
Current Biology, Volume 18
S12
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
†
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Cocoa
Yes/High
0.0
---
4403.5
72
0.0
----
1182.0
243
----
----
----
0.27
100
2.09
Vaccinium macrocarpon, V. oxycoccus, Vaccinium corymbosum, V. angustifolium, V. ashei, V. myrtillus *
Cranberry, Blueberry
Yes/High
11.8
581
0.0
----
82.5
654
0.0
----
7.02
11
0.47
----
----
----
Vanilla planifolia, V. † pompona
Vanilla
Yes/High
0.0
---
16.5
367
0.0
----
1.4
315
----
----
----
0.08
-11
1.15
Abelmoschus esculentus *
Okra, Gumbo
Yes/Low
0.0
---
326.0
157
0.0
----
1107.4
385
----
----
----
3.40
89
2.17
Arachis hypogaea
Groundnut, Peanut
Yes/Low
666.2
-18
15975.2
36
945.5
63
13146.5
252
1.42
99
2.03
0.82
159
2.56
Brassica alba (syn. Sinapis alba, B. hirta), B. nigra, (syn. Sinapis nigra)
Mustard Seed
Yes/Low
337.2
11
126.0
142
172.8
62
73.6
189
0.51
47
1.40
0.58
19
0.41
Rapeseed, Oilseed rape, Canola
Yes/Low
1373.5
847
6444.0
172
1876.7
1365
4108.3
542
1.37
55
1.21
0.64
136
2.81
Pigeon pea, Cajan pea, Congo bean
Yes/Low
0.0
---
2727.3
72
0.0
----
2228.0
64
----
----
----
0.82
-4
0.17
Theobroma cacao
Brassica napus
Cajanus cajan
‡
†
Current Biology, Volume 18
S13
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Capsicum annuum, C. fructescens, Pimenta dioica (syn. P. officinalis, P. dioica)
Chile pepper, Red pepper, Bell pepper, Green pepper, Allspice, Pimento
Yes/Low
116.0
59
543.9
186
1508.9
190
4399.1
390
13.00
82
1.71
8.09
71
1.71
Carica papaya
Papaya
Yes/Low
0.6
56
113.3
244
12.6
48
1305.3
404
19.58
-5
0.34
11.52
46
1.33
Carthamus tinctorius
Safflower Seed
Yes/Low
228.6
16
528.6
5
189.4
15
137.6
165
0.83
-1
-1.19
0.26
152
3.03
Castanea sativa
Chestnut
Yes/Low
52.0
101
50.9
366
423.8
-65
170.6
504
8.15
-82
-1.48
3.35
30
-0.32
Citrus aurantifolia, C. aurantium,C. bergamia, C. grandis, C. limetta, C. limon, C. maxima, C. medica (var. cedrata),C. myrtifolia, C. paradisi, C. reticulata, C. sinensis, C. unshiu,
Bergamot, Chinotto, Citron, Clementine, Grapefruit, Kumquat, Lemon, Lime, Mandarine, Orange, Pomelo, Tangerine
Yes/Low
701.5
55
1542.9
335
12387.9
100
12635.4
613
17.66
29
0.97
8.19
64
0.93
Coconut
Yes/Low
0.0
---
5235.2
103
0.0
----
23844.9
132
----
----
----
4.55
14
0.34
‡
Fortunella japonica
Cocos nucifera
†
Current Biology, Volume 18
S14
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Yield
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Coffea arabica, C. canephora, C. liberica
Coffee, green
Yes/Low
2.0
24
9767.7
4
3.1
-7
4530.4
73
1.55
-24
-0.60
0.46
66
1.38
Diospyros kaki; D. virginiana
Persimmon
Yes/Low
41.3
-16
81.1
757
464.2
-5
525.8
381
11.24
14
0.21
6.49
-44
-0.27
Oil palm fruit
Yes/Low
0.0
---
3624.7
266
0.0
----
13669.8
1185
----
----
----
3.77
251
6.22
Ficus carica
Fig
Yes/Low
479.3
-71
101.9
184
1067.9
-82
504.4
81
2.23
-37
-1.00
4.95
-36
-1.22
Fragaria sp.
Strawberry
Yes/Low
86.9
148
7.3
563
717.6
326
36.9
2676
8.26
72
1.36
5.07
319
4.71
Glycine max, G.
Soybean
Yes/Low
12034.1
172
11784.8
411
19401.1
390
7481.7
1589
1.61
80
1.71
0.63
230
5.10
Cotton seed
Yes/Low
9327.9
-8
22552.4
16
13725.5
51
13634.0
276
1.47
65
0.91
0.60
224
4.20
Sunflower seed
Yes/Low
5163.2
201
1503.9
443
5825.9
266
991.1
912
1.13
22
0.03
0.66
86
2.14
Linseed, Flax
Yes/Low
6118.8
-71
3427.4
-50
2232.1
-18
1478.9
16
0.36
180
4.02
0.43
134
2.78
Tomato
Yes/Low
834.5
18
846.0
327
16551.3
129
11066.3
692
19.83
94
2.08
13.08
85
2.26
Elaeis guineensis
soja
†
‡
Gossypium hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, G. ‡ herbaceum Helianthus annuus
‡
Linum usitatissimum Lycopersicon ‡
esculentum
‡
Current Biology, Volume 18
S15
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Yield
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Phaseolus sp., P. vulgaris, P. lunatus, P. angularis, P. aureus, P. mungo, P. coccineus, P. calcaratus, P. aconitifolius, P. ‡ acutifolius
Bean dry like Kidney bean, Haricot bean, Lima bean, Azuki bean, Mungo bean, String bean
Yes/Low
5050.6
-73
17890.4
42
3229.1
7
8932.8
110
0.64
293
7.72
0.50
47
0.91
Ribes nigrum, R. rubrum *
Black currant, Red currant
Yes/Low
7.7
1744
0.0
----
302.1
151
0.0
----
39.33
-86
-2.32
----
----
----
Sesamum indicum
Sesame seed
Yes/Low
40.8
-21
4932.9
52
15.0
42
1410.7
135
0.37
79
2.33
0.29
54
1.29
Solanum melongena
Eggplant, Aubergine
Yes/Low
49.4
28
743.1
141
878.2
62
6148.6
396
17.77
27
0.52
8.27
105
2.73
Vicia faba
Broad Bean, dry (Broad bean, Faba bean, Field bean, Horse bean)
Yes/Low
909.0
-48
4493.8
-52
768.8
11
4073.8
-9
0.85
114
3.28
0.91
92
1.71
Vigna subterranea (syn. Voandzeia † subterranea)
Bambara bean, Bambara groundnut, Earth pea
Yes/Low
0.0
---
40.5
110
0.0
----
29.6
154
----
----
----
0.73
21
0.48
Current Biology, Volume 18
S16
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Yield
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Vigna unguiculata
Cowpea, Blackeye pea, Blackeye bean
Yes/Low
79.2
-78
2328.4
336
88.3
-52
781.8
533
1.12
124
2.01
0.34
45
1.24
Vigna sp., V. unguiculata, V. subterranean (syn. Voandzeia subterranea), Phaseolus sp.
Bean, green
Yes/ ----
198.9
26
219.3
240
1085.2
7
921.8
471
5.46
-15
0.80
4.20
68
1.56
Allium cepa, A. ascalonicum, A. fistulosum
Onion, Shallot, Welsh onion (green)
None
§
406.2
61
890.2
225
5966.0
168
9169.6
437
14.69
66
1.47
10.30
65
1.60
Allium sativum (syn. Alliaria sativum)
Garlic
None
¶
72.0
88
699.2
47
352.8
234
3947.9
255
4.90
78
1.50
5.65
141
2.60
Ananas comosus
Pineapple
None
¶
36.3
-75
333.0
169
888.9
-65
2942.5
510
24.47
40
1.17
8.84
127
3.13
Asparagus officinalis
Asparagus
None
§
109.2
-19
530.8
135
336.7
20
1359.0
374
3.08
47
0.91
2.56
102
1.51
Avena sp., mainly
Oat
None
35449.1
-72
2811.7
-58
46809.7
-57
2779.1
5
1.32
51
0.92
0.99
149
2.38
Sugar beet
None
6501.9
-29
424.2
96
155084.7
40
5417.3
623
23.85
97
1.72
12.77
269
3.79
Cabbage, Cauliflower
None
992.2
-10
596.6
437
18857.8
12
7929.3
732
19.01
25
0.20
13.29
55
1.27
‡
Avena sativa
Beta vulgaris
‡
Brassica chinensis, B. oleracea
§
Current Biology, Volume 18
S17
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
Chenopodium † quinoa
Quinoa
None
0.0
---
52.6
33
0.0
----
32.4
81
----
----
----
0.62
36
0.45
Cicer arietinum
Chick pea, Bengal gram, Garbanzo bean
None
436.3
-25
11400.4
-9
216.3
79
7465.5
5
0.50
139
2.57
0.65
16
0.67
Cichorium intybus, C. endivia
Chicory root
None
§
11.9
36
5.0
-4
296.3
51
12.7
99
24.80
11
1.45
2.55
107
2.88
Colocasia esculenta
Taro (Coco Yam)
None
§
39.8
-62
718.4
150
488.4
-62
3998.7
192
12.27
0
-0.21
5.57
17
0.54
Daucus carota
Carrot
None
§
249.2
83
113.3
563
4529.7
195
1311.2
926
18.18
62
1.18
11.57
55
1.58
Dioscorea sp.
Yam
None
¶
3.4
161
1146.0
300
55.5
272
8268.9
519
16.37
42
0.70
7.22
55
0.83
Echinocloa frumentacea, Eleusine coracana, Eragrostis abyssinica, Panicum miliaceum, Paspalum scrobiculatum, Pennisetum glaucum, Setaria italica
Millet
None
4030.6
-74
39405.2
-19
2940.6
-61
22814.5
34
0.73
51
1.16
0.58
66
1.03
Hordeum disticum, H. hexasticum, H.
Barley
None
34795.2
14
19850.0
-21
54739.0
101
17813.2
61
1.57
76
1.65
0.90
103
1.79
vulgare
‡
Current Biology, Volume 18
S18
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level ¶
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Production
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
428.5
-80
12931.2
-31
7342.9
-75
90849.8
34
17.14
27
0.65
7.03
94
2.05
None
201.9
56
232.8
220
3864.3
133
2752.0
413
19.14
50
1.31
11.82
60
1.56
Lentil
None
163.9
465
1455.8
101
101.9
900
752.9
223
0.62
77
1.83
0.52
61
1.33
Manihot esculenta, (syn. M. utilissima, M. palmata) *
Cassava
None
¶
0.0
---
9623.9
93
0.0
----
71262.0
218
----
----
----
7.40
64
1.09
Musa sapientum, M. cavendishii, M. nana, M. paradisiaca
Banana, Plantain
None
¶
22.4
-1
4438.4
116
480.0
39
33736.4
208
21.46
40
1.33
7.60
43
0.85
Olea europea
Olive
None
1304.7
269
1304.1
213
6572.0
76
1633.6
228
5.04
-52
-1.29
1.25
5
0.47
Oryza sp. (mainly O. sativa)
Rice, Paddy
None
4422.8
-17
110942.3
36
20581.4
16
195065.2
213
4.65
40
0.79
1.76
131
3.07
Phoenix dactylifera
Date palm
None
2.1
45
248.3
375
31.4
-13
1859.3
259
14.92
-40
-1.15
7.49
-24
-0.48
Piper nigrum, P. longum *
Pepper
None
0.0
---
153.2
226
0.0
----
71.3
420
----
----
----
0.47
59
1.17
Pisum sativum, P. ‡ arvense
Pea, dry and green like Garden pea, Field pea
None
3110.8
37
5091.7
-30
5750.8
74
5383.5
53
1.85
27
1.46
1.06
119
2.62
Saccharum officinarum
Sugar cane
None
362.7
121
8549.7
129
29307.7
126
418674.8
217
80.81
2
-0.07
48.97
38
0.84
Rye
None
27572.5
-60
4706.0
-87
34242.8
104
9703.2
-74
1.24
417
10.62
2.06
108
1.30
Ipomoea batatas
Sweet potato
None
Lactuca sativa
Lettuce
Lens esculenta
Secale cereale
‡
Current Biology, Volume 18
S19
Table S3. Continued Species
Crop
Pollinator dependence /Dependence level ¶
Land area cultivated Developed world 1961 3 (10 .ha)
Production
Developing world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .ha)
Developed world
Δ2006 (%)
1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Yield
Developing world 1961 3 (10 .Mt)
Δ2006 (%)
Developed world 1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
Developing world
βΔyield (%/ yr)
1961 (Mt/ ha)
Δ2006 (%)
βΔyield (%/ yr)
18751.2
-54
3400.3
201
241697.4
-33
28875.2
428
12.89
47
0.79
8.49
75
2.04
None
5211.0
-47
43603.9
-9
24332.7
-39
55225.8
17
4.67
15
0.36
1.27
28
-0.51
Spinach
None
77.2
5
256.3
210
821.4
57
2140.3
483
10.64
51
0.68
8.35
88
1.11
Triticale sp.*
Triticale
None
0.0
---
0.0
----
0.0
----
0.0
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Triticum sp. (mainly T. aestivum, T.
Wheat
None
128293.6
-11
75942.0
34
163695.6
91
58692.3
399
1.28
114
2.79
0.77
273
6.48
Table Grape, Vine Grape
None
7209.8
-33
2126.7
20
31470.9
31
11535.7
141
4.37
95
1.32
5.42
100
2.47
Maize, Green corn, Sweet corn
None
69933.8
-22
64013.7
60
561826.5
25
82013.7
353
8.03
59
1.50
1.28
183
4.12
Mixed Grain
None
2719.4
-32
340.0
-99
5673.6
-24
310.0
-98
2.09
11
0.38
0.91
65
0.77
Solanum tuberosum
‡
Potato
None
Sorghum
Spinacia olearacea
Sorghum guineense, S. vulgare, S. dura
durum, T. spelta) Vitis vinifera
Zea mais
(1)
‡
‡
‡
‡
Current Biology, Volume 18
S20
Table S3. Continued Complete 45-yr series (1961-2006) for each crop is available at ref. [S1]. For all the three variables we present the values of the year 1961 and their percent change at year 2006 (Δ2006) and for yield the average annual growth rate in relative yield (βΔyield, see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Table is sorted according to the pollinator-dependence level (high dependence, low dependence, and nondependence) and inside these groups in an alphabetical order. (1) A crop category including a mix of cereal species that are sown and harvested together. * Estimation of relative area, production, yield and βΔyield (%/yr) for either the developed or developing world was not possible because data started being recorded after 1961. †
The crop is not cultivated in the developed world.
‡
Subset of 10 important pollinator dependent and nondependent crops cultivated in both the developed and developing world.
§
Pollinators increase seed production to produce the vegetative parts that we consume.
¶
Pollinators increase seed production in plant breeding, but the plants reproduce vegetatively and we consume the vegetative parts.