Measurement of Top Pair Production Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo on behalf of DØ Collaboration

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Motivation • A pure third generation decay which has not been observed with 3σ significance.

proton q

t

g

t → τ ντ b q

• Search for new physics in top quark decay mechanisms. • In many top quark analyses, it is assumed that top quark decays predominantly via weak interaction into a W boson and a b quark.

antiproton

l, q W+

ν, q’

t

t → Wb

Slide 1 of 18

b

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

New physics in top quark decay mechanism Charged Higgs exist in non-minimal Higgs model (e.g. 2HDM) or beyond standard model physics (e.g. MSSM). Top quark can decay to charged Higgs.

H ± ,W+

t → H ± b → τ ντ b

l, q ν, q’

Branching Ratio

t 1

b

0.9

+

H → cs

0.8 0.7

H+ → τν

0.6

*

H+ → t b H+ → WA0

0.5 0.4 0.3

H+ → Wh0

0.2 0.1 1

10

At large tan β, the charged Higgs decay predominantly into taus. Figure made with CPsuperH, CPC 156 (2004), 283.

tan(β)

Slide 2 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Experimental Apparatus: Fermilab Tevatron Accelerator Proton-antiproton collider with center-of-mass energy 1.96 TeV.

Analysis uses 1.0 fb −1 of recorded data from April 2002 to February 2006.

Slide 3 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Experimental Apparatus: DØ Detector

Slide 4 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Event Preselection

b¯ ν¯

q

• One isolated tau with ET > 10 GeV, appears as narrow jet.



W−

`

t

W+

τ+



ν q

• One isolated electron (muon), pT > 15(20) GeV, |η| < 1.1(2.0). Veto second isolated lepton.

b

• At least two jets, pT > 20 GeV, |η| < 2.5, leading jet pT > 30 GeV. • E/T> 15 GeV, from the presence of three neutrinos. • Lepton and tau are expected to have opposite charge sign. • Identify b−quark jet to increase signal to background ratio.

It is a lepton + three jets event !

Slide 5 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Tau reconstruction and identification: Basics Tau lifetime ∼ 0.29 ps, ct = 87µm. Decay products of a highly-boosted tau are almost collinear with the tau.

_

Reconstruction cone R = 0.5 Isolation cone R = 0.3

τ

+

π

π

0

ντ

π _ π

BR ≈ 35% : τ −



e− ν¯e ντ , µ− ν¯µ ντ

BR ≈ 10% : τ −



π − ντ

BR ≈ 35% : τ −



π − N π 0 ντ

BR ≈ 15% : τ −



π − π + π − N π 0 ντ

Leptons from tau decays will be swamped by leptons from W/Z decays. Hadronic decay products will appears as narrow, isolated jets, with charged tracks and hadronic energy deposition. Neutral pions will appear as electromagnetic energy deposition.

Slide 6 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Tau reconstruction and identification: DØ Algorithm ντ

ντ

HAD

π−

π−

ντ

π−

+

π π−

π0

EM

π0

τ−

τ−

Type 1

Type 2

Type 3 DØ Run II Preliminary

Number of events

τ−

identify taus.

-1

DATA Multijet W → µ + jets Z → τ-τ+ + jets Z → µ-µ+ + jets WW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-µτ t t → µτ

700

Type 1: one track, w/o EM cluster. Type 2: one track, w/ EM clusters. Type 3: two or more tracks. Neural networks algorithm is used to

L = 994 pb

600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

Tau neural network output (all type, 0.5 ≤ NN_τ ≤ 1.0))

Slide 7 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Background Processes and Their Estimation q'

b

g

Fake τ

b g

W +jets, use shapes from MC and normalized to data.

W l ν

q proton q

e+ , µ+ , τ +

Z0

Z+jets, estimated from MC.

− − e– , µ , τ

q antiproton

l+ W+ q

g

Multijet, estimated using MC and data events with same charge sign (SS).

ν c

b b

q

W– q

g

c

q'

Fake τ

SS SS NMultijet = Ndata − NW+jets

Other small backgrounds (e.g. diboson) are estimated using MC. Slide 8 of 18

like

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

L = 1 fb

Number of events

Number of events

Preselected sample DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

70 60 50 40 30

50

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

L = 1 fb DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

45 40 35 30 25 20 15

20

10

10

5

00

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

00

160

Lepton p (GeV), ≥ 2 jets

20

40

60

80

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

L = 1 fb

Number of events

Number of events

T

DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

70 60 50 40

50 40

20

10

10 60

80

100

120

140

160

Leading jet E (GeV), ≥ 2 jets

160

DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

60

20

40

140

L = 1 fb

70

30

20

120

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

30

00

100

Tau ET (GeV), ≥ 2 jets

00

T

100

200

300

400

500

600

Hint of tops in the sample (S:B 1 : 8), now add b−tagging. Slide 9 of 18

700

800

HT(lepton+jets+τ+MET), ≥ 2 jets

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Neural network b−tagging Combine information from displaced tracks and secondary vertices into one neural network output.

Average efficiency to tag b-quark in this analysis is 54 %, with fake rate of 1 %.

Slide 10 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

30

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

L = 1 fb

Number of events

Number of events

b−tagged sample DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

25 20 15

20

DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

18 16 14 12 10

6 4

5

2

00

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

00

160

Lepton p (GeV), ≥ 1 tags, ≥ 2 jets

20

40

T

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

L = 1 fb

Number of events

Number of events

L = 1 fb

8

10

20

-1

DØ Run II Preliminary

DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

18 16 14 12 10

20

4

2

2 80

100

120

140

160

160

DATA Multijet W Z → µ+µ- or e+eZ → τ+τWW, WZ tt → lepton + jets tt → dilepton non-lτ tt → l+τ

10

4

60

140

-1

12

6

40

120

L = 1 fb

14

6

Leading jet E (GeV), ≥ 1 tags, ≥ 2 jets

100

DØ Run II Preliminary

16

8

20

80

Tau ET (GeV), ≥ 1 tags, ≥ 2 jets

18

8

00

60

00

T

Slide 11 of 18

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

HT(lepton+jets+τ+MET), ≥ 1 tags, ≥ 2 jets

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Elimination of multijet background Assume that multijet events contribute equally to opposite-charge sign (OS) and same-charge sign (SS) sample. OS Ndata

OS = NtOS + N ¯ Multijet t,W,Z,diboson

SS Ndata

SS = NtSS + N ¯ Multijet t,W,Z,diboson

Then OS SS SS Ndata − Ndata = NtOS − N ¯ t,W,Z,diboson tt¯,W,Z,diboson

Slide 12 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Cross-section extraction In the individual eτ and µτ channel, the cross-section is extracted using:

σtt¯ =

OS Ndata



SS Ndata





OS SS NW − NW  SS OS tt¯ − tt¯ ×

OS − NZOS − Ndiboson L

In the combined measurement over more than one channels, we minimize a negative log-likelihood function based on the Poisson probability to observe a number of events (Njobs ) in each individual channel j. We measure: σtt¯ =

+1.4 8.3+2.0 (stat) −1.8 −1.2 (syst) ± 0.5 (lumi) pb

Slide 13 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

D l+jets

Run II

March 2008

preliminary*

(b-tagged and topological, PRL)

7.42

910 pb–1

l+jets

(from B(t→Wb)/B(t→Wq), PRL)

dilepton

(topological)*

1050 pb–1

l+track 1050 pb

(b-tagged)*

–1

tau+lepton 1050 pb

350 pb

alljets

(b-tagged)*

–1

tau+jets

+0.90 ±0.50 –0.84

pb

6.8

+1.2 +0.9 ±0.4 –1.1 –0.8

pb

5.1

+1.6 +0.9 ±0.3 –1.4 –0.8

pb

8.3

+2.0 +1.4 ±0.5 –1.8 –1.2

pb

5.1

+4.3 +0.7 ±0.3 –3.5 –0.7

pb

4.5

+2.0 +1.4 ±0.3 –1.9 –1.1

pb

8.18

910 pb–1

(b-tagged)*

–1

(b-tagged, PRD)

410 pb–1

pb

±0.53 ±0.46 ±0.45

(stat) (syst) (lumi)

Cacciari et al., JHEP 0404, 068 (2004)

mtop = 175 GeV

0

Kidonakis and Vogt, PRD 68, 114014 (2003)

2

4

6

8

10

12

σ (pp → tt) [pb]

Slide 14 of 18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Measurement of σ × BR(tt¯ → ` + τ + b¯b) A simple measure of top quark decay rate to tau lepton. Assume standard model cross-section for expected top events which are coming from lepton+jets and non-tau dilepton decay modes. σtt¯ × BR(tt¯ → ` + τ + b¯b) =

OS OS Ndata − Nnon−tau

tt¯,W,Z,diboson OS tt¯→`+τ +b¯ b

− NMultijet

At mtop = 175 GeV / σtt¯ = 6.8 pb, we measure: σtt¯ × BR(tt¯ → ` + τ + b¯b)

=

+0.08 +0.07 0.19−0.08 (stat)−0.07 (syst) ± 0.01 (lumi) pb.

The standard model expectation is 0.126. Less statistically significant than the cross-section: low purity of real taus in the selected sample. The cross-section extraction uses additional acceptance from l+jets and non-tau dilepton. Slide 15 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Conclusions from Tevatron analysis • We measured both the top quark pair production cross-section using lepton+hadronic tau events, and the σ × BF(tt¯ → `τ ννb¯b) +1.4 σtt¯ = 8.3+2.0 (stat) −1.8 −1.2 (syst) ± 0.5 (lumi) pb +0.08 +0.07 σtt¯ × BR(tt¯ → `τ ννb¯b) = 0.19−0.08 (stat)−0.07 (syst) ± 0.01 (lumi) pb.

• Very exciting and challenging analysis which uses all object identification: electron, muon, tau, tracks, jets, b−tagging, MET. • Will be used in a global search for charged Higgs boson in combination with dilepton and lepton+jets channels: Add sensitivity to tauonic charged Higgs model. Require orthogonality between pure dilepton, lepton+tau, and lepton+jets channels. • Will be published as part of cross-section measurement in the dilepton channel. Slide 16 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Outlook for LHC • Current efficiency at the Tevatron is about 5 % for pure lepton+tau events, equivalent to about 10 lepton+tau events per 1 fb−1 . • With 80 million top quark pairs produced per year at the LHC, even at reconstruction efficiency of 1000 times smaller than at the Tevatron, we can expect to have about 15 lepton+tau events per year. • The real challenge is the task to develop the algorithm for, and suppress the background to tau reconstruction at the LHC ! • Tevatron has the advantage of being a well-understood environment, and can expect to have at least four times as much data used in this analysis. On the path to evidence/discovery. The race is on: Who will see the pure third generation decay first ?

Slide 17 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

We hope that we will hear the answer at Pheno 2009 Thank you !

Slide 18 of 18

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Back-up Slides

Haryo Sumowidagdo

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Table 1: Input variabls to the neural-network b−tagging algorithm. Variable

Description

SV TSL DLS

Decay length significance of the secondary vertex

CSIP Comb

Weighted combination of the tracks’ impact parameter significance

JLIP Prob

Probability that the jet originates from the primary vertex

SV TSL χ2d.o.f.

Chi square per degree of freedom of the secondary vertex

SV TL Ntracks

Number of tracks used to reconstruct the secondary vertex

SV TSL Mass

Mass of the secondary vertex

SV TSL Num

Number of secondary vertices found in the jet

Back-up Slide 1 of 5

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Table 2:

Branching ratios (in unit of %) for dominant leptonic and hadronic decay modes of tau, sorted by expected tau type, as stated in Particle Data Book 2006 edition. Decay modes

Branching ratio (%)

Leptonic decay τ − → e− ν¯e ντ

17.84 ± 0.05

τ − → µ− ν¯µ ντ

17.36 ± 0.05

Type 1 Hadronic single-prong decay without π 0 τ − → π − ντ

10.90 ± 0.07

Type 2 Hadronic single-prong decay with π 0 τ − → π − π 0 ντ

25.50 ± 0.10

τ − → π − 2π 0 ντ

9.47 ± 0.12

τ − → π − 3π 0 ντ

1.04 ± 0.08

Type 3 Hadronic three-prong decays τ − → π − π + π − ντ

9.33 ± 0.08

τ − → π − π + π − π 0 ντ

4.59 ± 0.07

Back-up Slide 2 of 5

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Table 3: Data and predicted numbers of events before and after b-tagging is applied. Standard model cross section and branching ratios are assumed for tt¯ production. Uncertainties are statistical only. before b-tagging µτ

after b-tagging



µτ



W

38.0 ± 1.7

34.1 ± 3.5

2.31 ± 0.22

2.13 ± 0.27

Z/γ ∗ → ee or µµ

20.7 ± 1.1

5.8 ± 0.6

1.09 ± 0.11

0.38 ± 0.05

Z/γ ∗ → τ τ

19.6 ± 1.2

7.5 ± 0.6

1.02 ± 0.10

0.54 ± 0.06

2.8 ± 0.1

5.1 ± 0.6

0.21 ± 0.01

0.34 ± 0.07

Multijet tt¯ → ` + τ + 2b + 2ν tt¯ → other dileptons

10.6 ± 6.3

12.7 ± 6.6

4.52 ± 3.01

-1.27 ± 1.77

7.8 ± 0.1

6.67 ± 0.1

5.64 ± 0.04

4.70 ± 0.05

4.3 ± 0.1

0.73 ± 0.1

3.14 ± 0.03

0.47 ± 0.07

tt¯ → ` + jets

12.7 ± 0.1

12.41 ± 0.2

8.40 ± 0.11

7.88 ± 0.12

Total Expected

116.6 ± 6.8

85.0 ± 7.7

26.33 ± 3.02

15.17 ± 1.97

Diboson

Data

104

69

Back-up Slide 3 of 5

29

18

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Table 4: Systematics for the measurement of σtt¯. µτ



combined

∆σ

∆σ

∆σ

Jet energy calibration

+0.30 −0.50

+0.33 −0.36

+0.43 −0.35

PV identification

+0.36 −0.34

+0.23 −0.37

+0.38 −0.21

Muon identification

+0.21 −0.20



+0.12 −0.12



+0.59 −0.53

+0.25 −0.24

Tau identification

+0.16 −0.15

+0.15 −0.15

+0.16 −0.16

Trigger

+0.00 −0.00

+0.12 −0.07

+0.14 −0.13

Fakes

+0.45 −0.42

+0.59 −0.53

+0.50 −0.49

b-tagging

+0.31 −0.34

+0.44 −0.41

+0.45 −0.37

MC normalization

+0.18 −0.18

+0.15 −0.15

+0.13 −0.13

Background/MC statistics

+1.46 −1.46

+1.19 −1.19

+1.00 −0.91

Other

+0.08 −0.08

+0.09 −0.10

+0.19 −0.18

Subtotal

+1.76 −1.67

+1.64 −1.59

+1.40 −1.24

±0.49

±0.52

±0.51

+1.83 −1.95

+1.72 −1.67

+1.49 −1.34

Electron identification

Luminosity Total

Back-up Slide 4 of 5

tt¯ Cross-Section in Lepton+Hadronic Tau Channel

Haryo Sumowidagdo

Table 5: Systematics for the measurement of σtt¯ × BR. µτ



combined

∆σ × BR

∆σ × BR

∆σ × BR

Jet energy calibration

+0.030 −0.023

+0.017 −0.019

+0.022 −0.020

PV identification

+0.020 −0.011

+0.019 −0.010

+0.019 −0.011

Muon identification

+0.004 −0.004



+0.005 −0.005



+0.027 −0.025

+0.015 −0.014

Tau identification

+0.006 −0.006

+0.006 −0.006

+0.007 −0.006

Trigger

+0.014 −0.013

+0.005 −0.003

+0.006 −0.006

Fakes

+0.034 −0.036

+0.030 −0.030

+0.032 −0.033

b-tagging NLO tt¯ cross-section

+0.025 −0.019

+0.022 −0.020

+0.023 −0.020

+0.027 −0.026

+0.023 −0.022

+0.025 −0.024

MC normalization

+0.009 −0.009

+0.006 −0.005

+0.007 −0.007

Background/MC statistics

+0.066 −0.066

+0.045 −0.045

+0.041 −0.037

Other

+0.004 −0.004

+0.007 −0.007

+0.010 −0.008

Subtotal

+0.093 −0.089

+0.074 −0.071

+0.072 −0.066

±0.011

±0.012

±0.011

+0.094 −0.090

+0.075 −0.072

+0.073 −0.067

Electron identification

Luminosity Total

Back-up Slide 5 of 5

Measurement of Top Pair Production Cross-Section ...

π. −. Nπ. 0 ντ. BR ≈ 15% : τ. −. → π. − π. + π. −. Nπ. 0 ντ. Leptons from tau decays will be swamped by leptons from W/Z decays. Hadronic decay products will appears as narrow, isolated jets, with charged tracks and hadronic energy deposition. Neutral pions will appear as electromagnetic energy deposition. Slide 6 of 18 ...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 212 Views

Recommend Documents

Organization Capital and the CrossSection of Expected ...
Frydman and Erik Loualiche for sharing their data, and Tyler Muir and Omair ..... or other form of venture financing, depending on how the purchase of physical.

Test Pair of lines
2) Find the joint equation of the following pair of lines: 3) passing through (2, 3) and parallel ... 17)AOAB is formed by the lines x2 – 4xy + y2. = 0 and the line AB.

Think-Pair-Share.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.

PAIR WORK SHOPPING.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. PAIR WORK ...

N-pair loss - GitHub
Clustering: F1 and NMI (normalized mutual information). 2. Retrieval: .... Technical Report CNS-TR-2011-001, California Institute of Technology, 2011. [9] Yi et al. ... Striving for simplicity: The all convolutional net, In ICLR Workshop, 2015.

Pair of lice lost or parasites regained
Mar 7, 2007 - Email: David L Reed* - [email protected]; Jessica E Light ..... and we have instead relied upon ad-hoc phylogenetic tests to determine ...

A PAIR OF SILK STOCKINGS Kate Chopin ( American ...
for the boys and sailor-hats for the girls. The vision ... in price from two dollars and fifty cents to one dollar and ninety-eight cents; and a young girl who stood ... "A dollar and ninety-eight cents," she mused aloud. "Well, I'll take this pair."

Pair Approximations of Takeover Dynamics in Regular ...
analysis for evolutionary algorithms in terms of the well-known Susceptible-Infectious-. Susceptible (SIS) model of disease spread (Anderson and May, 1995; ...

twisted pair cable pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. twisted pair ...

Measurement - GitHub
Measurement. ○ We are now entering the wide field era. ○ Single gains no longer adequate. ○ Gains are direction dependant ...

First-Order Inquisitive Pair Logic
establish that our Tree-sequent calculus enjoys a cut-elimination theorem. ..... Theorem 1. Γ |=Mall A iff Γ |=Mint A iff Γ VI A. Proof. Γ VI A =⇒ Γ |=Mall A is clear ...... Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automated Reasoni

Antenna Measurement
The limit-values are valid for telephony using a mobile phone i.e. phonecalls and ... 3 downlink signal level as the basis for coverage for a loaded network. ..... EFFECTS RELATING TO TERRESTRIAL LAND MOBILE SERVICE IN. THE VHF ...

Host Measurement of Network Traffic
Host Measurement of Network Traffic. DongJin Lee and Nevil Brownlee. Department of Computer Science. The University of Auckland.