New Research on Paleolithic of Iran: Preliminary Report of 2004’ Iranian-French Joint Mission Jacques Jaubert, Fereidoun Biglari, Jean-Guillaume Bordes, Laurent Bruxelles, Vincent Mourre, Sonia Shidrang, Rahmat Naderi and Simko Alipour
Introduction
*
During last two decades, on F. Biglari’s initiative,
For various reasons, Iran kept away these two or three
surveys started again in several geographical units,
last decades from the international research on
even of Western Iran: of course in the Kermanshah
Paleolithic undertaken all over the Near and Middle
region (Biglari and Heydari 2001; Shidrang 2004),
East, Anatolia, the Caucasus or Central Asia. Only since late 1990’s results of new surveys have been published
in
international
scale
by
Iranian
archaeologists. In domains such as first indication of human settlement, the definition of lithic industries or the chronocultural sequences of Early Prehistory
* Jacques Jaubert and Jean-Guillaume Bordes, Université de Bordeaux 1, Institut de Préhistoire et de Géologie du Quaternaire, UMR 5199, PACEA, Avenue des Facultés, F-33450 Talence;
[email protected];
[email protected] Fereidoun Biglari, Sonia Shidrang and Rahmat Naderi, Center for Paleolithic Research, National Museum of Iran, 30 Tir st.,
(Early and Middle Paleolithic), the origins of Homo
Emam Khomaini Ave., P.O.Box 11365/4364, Tehran; F.Biglari@
sapiens, the extension of Neanderthals or the diffusion
nationalmuseumofiran.ir;
of the Hominids towards the Central Asia since the
[email protected]
[email protected];
African cradle, Iran is incontestably a key country,
Laurent Bruxelles, INRAP, ZA Les Champs Pinsons, 13 rue
composed of a whole of strategic and under-exploited
du Négoce, F-31650 Saint-Orens-de-Gammeville, UMR 8555,
areas since the withdrawal of the Zagros foreign missions (e.g. Smith 1986). Opportunity of investing there, in collaboration with the Iranian archaeologists assumes thus a very particular interest, which it was advisable not to underestimate.
Centre d’Anthropologie, Toulouse;
[email protected] Vincent Mourre, Doctor in Prehistory University of Paris X, UMR 5608, UTAH, Toulouse Les Hauts Arthèmes, F-84560 Ménerbes;
[email protected] Simko Alipour, Master of History, P.O.Box 59135-574, Mahabad;
[email protected]
2
Archaeological Reports (3)
Bisotun massif (Biglari 2001), Islamabad Plain
Research (ICHTO) in September 2004 concretizes the
(Biglari and Abdi 1999), Rawansar region (Biglari
first contacts of spring 2003. As it was a new project
and Taheri 2001). Paleolithic surveys in the Lorestan,
with new research field (for French part), we wished
Ilam, Kashan, Gilan, East Azarbaijan and Fars also
to start with reasonable programming in order to grow
led to new results (Biglari 2004a, 2004b, 2005; Biglari
up in power in the years to come.
and Abdi 1999; Biglari et al. 2004; Biglari and
Four principal subjects were tackled concerning
Ghafari 2004; Heydari and Ghasidian 2004; Roustaei
four regions (fig.1) that we propose to gather in three
et al. 2004; Shidrang 2005).
chronological topics (Lower, Middle and early Upper
At the same time, international contacts have been
Paleolithic).
or are about to be established with several European research centers or universities: _ Bordeaux 1 University, France, UMR 5199 (Pr. Jacques Jaubert); _ Liège University, Belgium (Pr. Marcel Otte); _ Tübingen University, Germany (Pr. Nicholas Conard);
Lower Paleolithic This work concerned the study of lithic series recently discovered by S. Alipour and the members of the mission, on a place named Shiwatoo near Qaziabad in Mahabad area (Azarbaijan-e Gharbi, North-Western Iran). The site is located on old dismantled levels of
_ Tsukuba University, Japan (Pr. Akira Tsuneki).
terrace dominating the Mahabad River and reservoir
It is clear that a notable investment of the scientific
will be very difficult to date – even roughly – but
(fig. 2). We are thus dealing with a lithic industry that
international community, and more particularly
which
European, is from now obvious towards Iran. Without
typological indices: unifacial and partial unifacial
falling into the trap of a new “race” to the key areas,
Discoid flaking (choppers-cores), bipolar on anvil
this renewed interest coincides on one hand with a
flaking together with productions of large flakes and
certain withdrawal or the stop of several missions in
pebble tools. The main discovery is a typical cleaver
the Near East, and accompanies on the other hand the
made on a side-struck flake of dark volcanic rock,
movement towards exploration of till these last years
probably andesite (fig. 3). This classical Acheulean
poorly invested areas for the Paleolithic research:
tool,
Anatolia (Otte 1995; Slimak et al. 2004), the
subcontinent, is here mentioned for the first time in an
Caucasus, Georgia with the famous discovery of
intermediate geographical position between these two
Dmanisi (e.g. Gabunia et al. 1999) and the
areas. The newly collected implements and a new
reexamination of few aspects of Paleolithic sequence
analysis of the series led to revise a previous chrono-
in (e.g. Adler and Tushabramishvili 2004), Armenia
cultural attribution to Oldowan (Otte et al. 2004).
(Fourloubey et al. 2003), Northeastern Caucasus (Zenine, unpublished) and now Iran.
present
indisputably
well-known
in
Acheulean
Levant
and
in
techno-
Indian
With Ganj Par in the Southern Caspian Basin (Biglari 2005; Biglari et al. 2004), and if we do not
The first Iranian-French mission carried out with
consider old isolated finds and occurrences like Gakia,
the University of Bordeaux 1 (Prehistory and
Pal Barik, Quri Gol (Braidwood 1960; Mortensen
Quaternary Geology Institute, UMR 5199-PACEA,
1993; Sadek-Kooros 1976; Singer and Wymer 1978), it
France) and Iranian Center for Archaeological
is for the first time that rich Acheulean assemblages
3
A Note on the Neolithic of Qara Aghaj Valley, …
are clearly described for Iran. Shiwatoo corresponds
points, convergent scrapers, déjetés or double scrapers
probably to the ‘East Azarbaijan single handaxe find
with frequently sharpened edges (figs. 6, 7). This
evocated by Singer and Wymer (1978). The completion
industry thus represents a particular economic and
of breakdowns and analysis (V. Mourre, F. Biglari, J.
functional facies, related most probably on the
Jaubert, R. Naderi, S. Alipour) during 2005 will allow
location and the operating mode of the site itself. A
us to publish a final report as soon as possible.
slab of fine grained limestone engraved of geometrical patterns was discovered but unfortunately we can’t be
Middle Paleolithic
assured that it was associated to Mar Tarik Mousterian
The study of the Iranian Middle Paleolithic is taken on
(fig. 8). It is the same for some human remains
the basis of a double objective: 1) to better define the
probably of Holocene age and ascribable to Homo
lithic industries and the chronological position of the
sapiens on the basis of first diagnosis (B. Maureille,
Zagros Mousterian; 2) to invest other geographical
UMR 5199-PACEA). The preliminary study of the
units than Zagros, starting with the Central Plateau
faunal assemblage which is mixed and poorly
(Niyasar).
preserved indicates the presence of mammals of small
During last field season, we pursue geological and
to average size and micro-vertebrates. The micro-
geomorphological investigation in Kermanshah area
vertebrates bones relate to fish, reptiles, and birds
(L. Bruxelles) to lay strong foundations for these
remains and most of mammals remains belong to
fields and to supplement previous research on raw
caprines (M. Mashkour, UMR 5197-MNHN). A first
materials sources undertaken by S. Heydari and F.
date has been obtained by Y. Quinif (CERAK,
Biglari (Biglari 2004c; Heydari 2000, 2004).
University of Mons, Belgium) on stalagmite at the base
Concerning the first point, we excavated last year a
of the sequence: 123, 6 [+3,4/-3,2] kyr BP. A complete
perched cave at the base of Bisotun massif (30 km
program of dating (AMS 14C, ESR…) is in hand and
northeast of Kermanshah), Mar Tarik (figs. 4, 5) that
we will continue the study of Zagros Mousterian next
was unfortunately in very large part altered by
year by the cleaning up and reexamination with a new
clandestine excavations. This site and two other
excavation at the classical site of the cave of
neighboring caves were surveyed and published by
Bisotun/Hunter’s Cave (Coon 1951).
Biglari (Biglari 2001). The karstologic study and the
For Niyasar (area of Kashan), the important
history of its sedimentary dynamics could be drawn
discovery of Mousterian artifacts in this area of the
(L. Bruxelles). The study of the lithic material
Central
(V. Mourre,
supplemented in 2004 by a brief study of the
F. Biglari,
techno-typological
J. Jaubert) confirms the
relationship
with
previously
published data from this area (Hunter’s Cave,
Plateau
(Biglari
2004a)
has
been
sequence, more particularly of the travertine masses with sampling for new U/Th dating (L. Bruxelles).
Warwasi: e.g. Dibble 1984; Dibble and Holdoway 1993). Even if the former studies were not really
Upper Paleolithic
technologically oriented, we come across similar
During this campaign, we made an overview of the
elements such as use of close raw materials, Levallois
main Upper Paleolithic collections kept in the
flaking almost exclusive, strong proportion of
National Museum of Iran. This first study of some
retouched tools with a majority of points, elongated
Upper Paleolithic assemblages in the Museum
4
Archaeological Reports (3)
allowed us to conclude to the good representation of
but, in a wider context (Umm el Tlell, Syria: Ploux
the Baradostian in western Zagros. Nevertheless, the
and Soriano 2003; Ksar-Aqil, Lebanon: Tixier and
assemblages of Yafteh cave, near Khorramabad,
Inizan 1981), to the industrial development of the
appeared without contest as the richest and the best
Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) on the whole of the
preserved ones (Fig. 9). Thus, our efforts were
eastern and northern Mediterranean circumference:
dedicated to the study of this impressive lithic series,
large and straight bladelets at the base, small and
formerly excavated by F. Hole and K. Flannery (Hole
twisted bladelets at the top. This work confirms and
and Flannery 1967). The typo-technological study
precise the information given by Hole and Flannery
made it possible to describe the principal productions
(1967) and Olszewski (2001). This sequence should
and associated methods:
be clarified by new planned excavations, and
_ Large bladelets (3-7 cm) with straight profile and inverse/alterned retouch (Dufour) or direct bilateral
retouch
(Arjeneh
points,
rods).
Diagnostic breaks on some of these pieces suggests they were projectile heads; _ Small bladelets (1.5-2.5 cm) with twisted profile and alterned retouch (Dufour sub-type Roc-deCombe) made from “burins” cores; _ Laminar production dominated by unipolar blanks, often retouched as end scrapers and/or retouched blades, more rarely as burins.
completed by the study of the rest of the assemblage (tools on blade). This study, undertaken by J.-G. Bordes and S. Shidrang, will be continued next year with, as far as possible, a stay in Philadelphia to study the material from Warwasi which is preserved there.
Acknowledgments We would like to thank the people and institutions that facilitated the organization of the mission: Dr. Azarnoush,
Director
of
Iranian
Center
for
Archaeological Research (ICAR) at Iranian Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization (ICHTO), the
For all of these productions, the knapping technique is the direct soft-hammer percussion.
French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. M. Kargar, Director
of
National
Museum
of
Iran,
Mr.
Thanks to the quality of the old excavations, it was
K. Alizadeh, International relation Section, (ICAR,
possible to set back all the diagnostic pieces according
ICHTO), Mr. Bairanvand and Moradi (ICHTO,
to their depth. Thus, we could propose that these
Kermanshah), Mrs. M. Mehdi Abadi, director of
productions are organized in an archaeological
Bisoutun National Project and all the Iranian
sequence which can be related not only to the closest
(especially
reference sequences (Warwasi: Olszewski 1999, 2001;
M. Rahmati, M. Mashkour, Sh. Razmjou) and French
Olszewski and Dibble 1994; Shanidar: Solecki 1955),
(B. Maureille) colleagues who helped us.
A. Moradi
Bisotouni,
A. Azadi,
Bibliography Adler, D.S. and N. Tushabramishvili, 2004, “Middle Palaeolithic Patterns of Settlement and Subsistence in the Southern Caucasus”, in N.J. Conard (ed.), Settlement Dynamics of the
Middle Palaeolithic and Middle Stone Age, Vol. II, Tübingen: Kerns Verlag, pp. 91-132. Biglari, F., 2001, “Recent Finds of the Paleolithic Period from
5
A Note on the Neolithic of Qara Aghaj Valley, … Bisotun, Central Western Zagros Mountains”, Iranian Journal
Braidwood, R., 1960, “Seeking the World’s First Farmers in
of Archaeology and History 14/2: 4-5 (English), 50-60 (Farsi).
Persian Kurdistan”, Illustrated London News 237: 695-697.
______ , 2004a, “The Preliminary Survey of Paleolithic in the
Coon, C.S., 1951, Cave Explorations in Iran 1949, Philadelphia:
Kashan Region”, in S.M. Shahmirzadi (ed.), The Silversmiths
The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Museum
of Sialk (Sialk Reconsideration Project), Report No. 2, Tehran:
Monographs.
Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization, pp. 151-168.
Dibble, H.L., 1984, “The Mousterian Industry from Bisitun Cave (Iran)”, Paléorient 10/2: 23-34.
______ , 2004b, “The Discovery of the First Evidence of Middle
Dibble, H.L. and S.J. Holdoway, 1993, “The Middle Paleolithic
Palaeolithic Occupation at Nargeh in the Qazvin Plain in the
Industrie of Warwasi”, in D.I. Olszewski and H.L. Dibble
Northwest Central plateau of Iran”, Archaeological Reports 2,
(eds.), The Paleolithic Prehistory of the Zagros-Taurus,
Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, pp. 165-
Philadelphia:
169 (in Farsi, with an English abstract).
Pennsylvania, University Museum Monograph 83, pp. 75-99.
The
University
Museum,
University
of
______ , 2004c, “The Preliminary Observations on Middle
Fourloubey, Ch., C. Beauval, D. Colonge, V. Liagre, V. Ollivier
Paleolithic Raw Material Procurement and Usage in the
and Ch. Chataigner, 2003, “La Paléolithique en Arménie : état
Kermanshah Plain, the Case of Do-Ashkaft Cave”, in T.
des connaissances acquises et données récentes”, Paléorient
Stollner, R. Slotta, and A. Vatandoust (eds.), Persian Antiques
29/1: 5-18.
Splendor, Mining Crafts and Archaeology in Ancient Iran, Vol. I, Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum, pp. 130-138. ______ , 2005, “Ganj Par: New Evidence for Distribution of the
Gabunia, L., O. Jöris, A. Justus, D. Lordkipanidze, A. Muschelishvili, M. Nioradze, C.C. Swiser III, A. Vekua, und Mirtarbeit von G. Bosinski, R.C. Ferring, G. Majsuradze and
Acheulian into Iran”, Paper Presented at the 2005 ASOR
M.
Annual Meetings, Philadelphia, PA.
Alpaläolitischen findzplatzes Dmanisi (Georgien, Kaukazus)
Biglari, F. and K. Abdi, 1999, “Paleolithic Artifacts from Cham-e Souran, Islamabad Plain, Central Western Zagros Mountains, Iran”, Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran and Turan 5/31: 1-8.
Tvaltchrelidze,
1999,
“Neue
Hominidenfunde
des
im kontext Aktueller Grabungsbergebnisse”, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 29: 451-488. Heydari, S., 2000, Late Quaternary Climatic Changes of the Kermanshah Region on the Basis of Sedimentological
Biglari, F. and R. Ghafari, 2004, “The Preliminary Report on the
Evidence from the Geological Sections of Sorkheh Lizeh and
Discovery of Middle Paleolithic Artifacts near Maragheh,
Tang-e Kenesht, Unpublished MA thesis, Department of
Southeast of the Lake Urmieh”, in M. Azarnoush (ed.),
Geography, The Azad University of Najafabad, Isfahan (in
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Iranian Archaeology: Northwestern Region, Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, pp. 17-26 (In Farsi).
Farsi.) ______ , 2004, “Stone Raw Material Sources in Iran: Some Case Studies”, in T. Stollner, R. Slotta and A. Vatandoust (eds.),
Biglari, F. and S. Heydari, 2001, “Do-Ashkaft: A Recently
Persian Antiques Splendor, Mining Crafts and Archaeology in
Discovered Mousterian Cave Site in the Kermanshah Plain,
Ancient Iran, Vol. I, Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum
Iran”, Antiquity 75: 487-488.
Bochum, pp. 124-129.
Biglari, F., S. Heydari and S. Shidrang, 2004, “Ganj Par: The First
Heydari, S. and E. Ghasidian, 2004, “Geoarchaeological Survey in
Evidence for Lower Paleolithic Occupation in the Southern
Travertine Surroundings of Takht-e Soleyman Based on New
Caspian Basin, Iran”, Antiquity 78, No. 302, Project Gallery.
Archaeological Evidence in the Late Pleistocene”, in M.
Biglari F. and K. Taheri, 2001, “A Discovery of Upper Paleolithic
Azarnoush (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium
Remains at Mar Kuliyan and Mar Dalan Cave, Rawansar”, in
on Iranian Archaeology: Northwestern Region, Tehran:
F. Taheri (ed.), The Rawansar Region. Archaeology, Geology
Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, pp. 27-44 (in
and Culture, Kermanshah: Taq-e Bustan Publications, pp. 7-
Farsi).
27 (in Farsi).
Hole, F. and K.V. Flannery, 1967, “The Prehistory of
6
Archaeological Reports (3) Southwestern Iran: A Preliminary Report”, Proceedings of the
Sadek-Kooros, H., 1976, “Early Hominid Traces in east Azerbaijan”, in F. Bagherzadeh (ed.), Proceedings of the IVth
Prehistoric Society 33: 146-206. Mortensen, P., 1993, “Paleolithic and Epipaleolithic Sites in the
Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran,
Hulailan Valley, Northern Luristan”, in D.I. Olszewski and
Tehran, 1975, Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological
H.L. Dibble (eds.), The Paleolithic Prehistory of the Zagros-
Research, pp. 1-10.
Taurus, Philadelphia: The University Museum, University of
Shidrang, S., 2004, “Survey Report of a Cave and Two Rock
Pennsylvania, University Museum Monograph 83, pp. 159-
Shelters near Perspolis”, Archaeological Reports 3, Tehran:
186.
Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, pp. 31-36 (in
Olszewski, D.I., 1999, “The Early Upper Palaeolithic in the
Farsi, with an English abstract).
Zagros Mountains”, in W. Davies and R. Charles (eds.),
______ , 2005, “Survey of the Rockshelter Site of Warkaini Near
Dorothy Garrod and the Progress of the Palaeolithic. Studies
Kermanshah”, Archaeology 1: 76-79 (in Farsi, with an English
in the Prehistoric Archaeology of the Near East and Europe,
abstract).
Oxford: Owbow Books, pp. 167-180.
Singer, R. and J.J. Wymer, 1978, “A Hand-ax from Northwest
______ , 2001, “Ruminations on the Early Upper Paleolithic and a
Iran: The Question of Human Movement between Africa and
Consideration of the Zagros Aurignacian”, in M. Hays and
Asia in the Lower Paleolithic Period”, in L.G. Freeman (ed.),
P.T.
Resolving
Views of the Past: Essays in Old World Prehistory and
Fundamental Problems of the Early Upper Paleolithic,
Paleoanthropology, The Hague-Paris, Mouton publishers,
Oxford: BAR International Series 1005, pp. 79-89.
Congrès International des Sciences Anthropologiques et
Thacker,
Olszewski,
D.I.
Questioning
and
H.L.
the
Dibble,
Answer:
1994,
“The
Zagros
Ethnologiques, Chicago, IX 1973, pp. 13-27. Slimak, L., H. Roche, D. Mouralis, H. Buitenhuis, N. Balkan-Atli,
Aurignacian”, Current Anthropology 35/1: 68-75. Otte, M., dir., 1995, Préhistoire d’Anatolie. Genèse de deux
D. Binder, C. Kuzucuoğlu and M. Grenet, 2004, “Kaletepe
mondes (Anatolian Prehistory. At the Crossroads of Two
Deresi 3 (Turquie), aspects archéologiques, chronologiques et
Worlds), Actes du Colloque internat., Liège, 28 avril-3 mai
paléontologiques d’une séquence pléistocène en Anatolie
1997, ERAUL 85, 2 vols.
centrale”, Comptes Rendu Palevol de l’Académie des Sciences
Otte, M., F. Biglari, S. Alipour, R. Naderi and J. Hossein, 2004,
de Paris 3, pp. 411-420.
“Earliest Human Occupations in Central Asia: An Iranian
Smith, P.E.L., 1986, Palaeolithic Archaeology in Iran, The
Look”, in A.P. Derevianko, T.I. Nokhrina (eds.), Arkheologiya
American Institute of Iranian Studies, Monograph No. 1,
I
Philadelphia (PA): The University Museum, University of
Paleoekologiya
Evrazii,
Novosibirsk:
Rossijskaya
Akademiya Nauk, Sibirskoe Otdenie, Institut Arkheologii i Etnografii, pp. 279-282. Ploux, S. and S. Soriano, 2003, “Umm El Tlel, une séquence du Paléolithique supérieur en Syrie centrale. Industries lithiques et chronologie culturelle”, Paléorient 29/2: 5-34.
Pennsylvania. Solecki, R.S., 1955, “Shanidar Cave, A Palaeolithic Site in Northern Iraq”, Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1954, pp. 389-425. Tixier, J. and M.-L. Inizan, 1981, “Ksar’ Aqil: stratigraphies et
Roustaei, K., H. Vahdatinasab, F. Biglari, S. Heydari, G.A. Clark
ensembles lithiques dans le Paléolithique supérieur. Fouilles
and M. Lindly, 2004, “Recent Paleolithic Surveys in
1971-1975”, Préhistoire du Levant. 10-14 juin 1980, pp. 353-
Luristan”, Current Anthropology 45/5: 692-707.
367.
New Research on Palaeolithic of Iran …
Fig. 1. Map of Iran showing the location of the sites under research by Iranian-French mission (Graphic: F. Biglari)
Fig. 2. A general view of Shiwatoo, arrows showing the location of the lithic scatter (Photo: F. Biglari 2004)
7
8
Archaeological Reports (3)
Fig. 3. Acheulian artifacts from Shiwatoo, Mahabad region (Drawing: J. Jaubert)
Fig. 4. Mar Tarik cave, the arrow shows location of the cave mouth (Photo: M. Rahmati 2004)
New Research on Palaeolithic of Iran …
Fig. 5. Mar Tarik, general map and longitudinal profile of the cavity (Topography: J.-G. Bordes, J. Jaubert, R. Naderi, V. Mourre; Cad: V. Mourre)
Fig. 6. Selected Mousterian artifacts from Mar Tarik cave (Drawing: J. Jaubert, S. Shidrang)
9
10
Archaeological Reports (3)
Fig. 7. Selected Mousterian artifacts from Mar Tarik cave (Drawing: J. Jaubert, S. Shidrang)
New Research on Palaeolithic of Iran …
Fig. 8. Limestone plaque with engravings from Mar Tarik cave (Photo: J.-G. Bordes, F. Biglari)
11
12
Archaeological Reports (3)
Fig. 9. Selected Upper Paleolithic artifacts from Yafteh cave (Drawing: S. Shidrang)