Detailed Peer Review about the final essay Staple a piece of notebook paper (with your name on it) to the back of your essay. Pass your paper to the person at your right. When you have a paper that belongs to your neighbor, write “1.” and write your name. Then, address the questions that correspond with that number on this page. Be sure to write in complete sentences so the writer understands what you are discussing. You may also make marks on the paper itself. When you complete that number, pass it to the next person and do number 2 on the new paper you get…and so on. By the time you complete this peer review, you should get back detailed comments about six different parts of your paper from six different commenters in the class. 1. Discuss changes and suggestions you can recommend in detail in the introduction and the hook of this paper. Identify and respond to the thesis statement. Check how the introduction flows from one thought to another. Did the writer talk about the hook enough before moving on to the background info? And then between the background and the thesis? Does the conclusion refer back to the thesis and frame the essay as we discussed? 2. Give the writer suggestions to enhance the introductions to the quoted material. Can you tell who is saying the words and why we should listen to him or her? Offer tips to help the writer sound more scholarly. 3. Give the writer suggestions to enhance the responses to quoted material. Can you tell why this quote is important? Does the writer show what each quote means and show how each quote is connected to the thesis? Remember to respond to the sentences at the end of each paragraph. Do they answer the “so what?” question? 4. Give the writer tips for transition sentences BETWEEN source material. Remember that the essay should not sound like a list of source material strung together to look like an essay. The bulk of the paper should be the writer’s own words arguing a point. Give suggestions to enhance the flow from paragraph to paragraph and source to source. 5. Help the writer use more and better transition words. Here is a list of words you could suggest for them. For continuing a thought: consequently clearly, then furthermore additionally and in addition moreover because besides that in the same way following this further also pursuing this further in the light of the... it is easy to see that To restate a point: in other words point in fact specifically
To change the line of reasoning (contrast): however on the other hand but yet nevertheless on the contrary For the final points of a paragraph or essay: finally lastly To signal conclusion: therefore this hence in final analysis in conclusion in final consideration indeed
For opening a paragraph: admittedly assuredly certainly granted no doubt nobody denies obviously of course to be sure true undoubtedly unquestionably generally speaking in general at this level in this situation
6. Respond to the author’s counterargument and rebuttal. Does this section show that the author has weighed all the options and made a final proposal based on much knowledge? Does this section use enough source material and quotes to prove each point? Make suggestions to help the writer enhance the counter argument or to build one if you can’t find one.
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Peer Review ...
Now YOU whisper to him'. In this example, adults tended to interpret 'him' as Grover, whereas children interpreted. 'him' as Goofy. Another piece of research demonstrated that English children as old as five years did not make use of prosodic informa
2009). de Haan and colleagues employed a computational model to test the activity ..... functional images to 3 mm isotropic voxels that are the minimum spatial ...... Song XW, Dong ZY, Long XY, Li SF, Zuo XN, Zhu CZ, He Y, Yan CG, Zang YF.
social capital across individuals, and how these differences relate to differences in outcomes (cf. Lin, Cook .... a dynamic property of individuals that can change as a result of life events (Gist & Mitchell,. 1992), as ..... business development, c
during information exchange. Availability: http://dbmi-engine.ucsd.edu/webglore3/ ... to combine information across institutions to build powerful global models. There are ... (SMC), which approaches leverage security enhanced protocols.
black carbon, loss on ignition, urban soil, Glasgow, Coventry,. Stoke-on- .... policies for their management, policymakers need accurate measurements of SOC.
peer can initiate requests to other peers, and at the same time respond to ... operators even obstruct P2P traffic in their network in order to prevent ... File Sharing: technologies for sharing data between equal peers in large .... an API. Thus, JX
member at Princeton will count as one-third of a paper by Princeton. ..... has seen a large share of its top new Ph.D's take jobs in business schools over the last.
At least two sources are database articles from one of the following databases: >Gale Global Issues in Context. >Gale Opposing Viewpoints. >Gale Virtual Reference Library. >EBSCOhost Academic Search. Complete n/a. X. Group Discussions (*please note s
to make up my mind. ... cannot apply for support of my own research. ... research proposals, both of which can be intellectually rewarding. .... and site visits.
Study, and the Toulouse Network for Information Technology for their support. ..... helps both with disseminating the particular paper and for career-concerns ...
Robert J.S. Thomas. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Peer review of scientific literature is a time-honoured process with a long history. To paraphrase Relman,. ''It is hard to imagine how we, (sic. .... with no intervention, a gr
Security: The system should be secure against attacks such as a denial-of-service attack, .... Factors that affect security in P2P networks ... experienced hacker.
May 12, 2007 - Institute of Technology and Vocational Education ... team teaching for the class of science and technology. (2). Teachers approve students' ... years. According to the team teaching, it means teachers conduct a teaching ...
Lightfoot JT. A different method of teaching peer review systems. Am. J. Physiol. 1998; 274: S57â61. 4. Guildford WH. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv. Physiol. Education 2001; 25: 167â75. 5. Ingelfinger FJ. Charity
a Location Map shall be provided at a scale of 1â=1,500'; however, the Applicant. has provided a Location Map at a scale of 1â=800â. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retry