Integrated Watershed Management Programme
Preliminary Project Report (PPR)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India
1
Preliminary Project Report I.
Institutional Structures. I. A. State Level Nodal Agencies I. B. District Level Watershed Units
II.
Selection of Watershed Projects
III.
Profile of the each selected watershed project
IV.
Agro-climatic condition of project area.
V.
Demography & land distribution
VI.
Livelihoods
VII.
Expected project out comes
VIII.
Mandatory certificates
IX.
Status of on-going projects
X.
Abstract of projects proposed for sanction
2 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
I. Institutional Structures I. A. State Level Nodal Agencies (SLNAs): Table-PPR 1: Details of SLNA 1
2
3
S. No.
State
Type of SLNA
Kerala
Mission
#
4
5
6
Date of Notification
Date of MoU with DoLR
Total no. of members of SLNA
14 June 2010
Twenty five
#
Whether it is a Department/ Mission/ Society/ Authority/ Others (pl. specify) Table-PPR 1: Details of SLNA (Contd..)
#
7
8
Chairperson
CEO
Name
Designation
Name
Designation
Date of Appointment
Subrata Biswas IAS
Agriculture Production Commissioner
K.V. Mohankumar IAS
Commissioner for Rural Development
14 June 2010
Dr. Rajan Khobragade IAS
Secretary, LSGD
#
Nature of $ appointment
Tenure (No. of years)
Contact Ph. No./ Fax/ E-mail
APC/ ACS/ Dev. Commissioner/ Others (pl. specify) $ Deputation/ Contract
3 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table-PPR 2: Details of functionaries in the SLNAs* 1 Sl. No
1
2
3
4 5
6 7
8
2 Total no of Persons working in the SLNA of IWMP 8
3 Name & Designation
4 5 6 7 Qualification Experience Work Allocation Monthly remuneration
8 Total budget of SLNA
9 Funding Expected from DoLR (Rs)
K.Shoukathali, Administrative Officer M.Jayasree, Technical Expert (Agri) P.Balachandran Nair,Technical Expert (livelihhod)
MBA
25 Years
Administration & Co-ordination
Rs.65000/-
R NR 885000 3000000
MSc Agriculture
25 Years
DPR,Agri & Soil, GIS
Rs.65000/-
875000
875000
MA
12 Years
Rs.47000/-
636000
636000
Kabeer.H, Finance Officer Dinil.R, Accounts Asst
Mcom
25 Years
Rs.40000/-
540000
540000
MA
15 Years
Rs.30000/-
405000
405000
Sindhu.D.S, Accounts Asst Karthiyani Devi.A.J, Programmer
BSc
15 Years
Rs.28000/-
379000
379000
Btech Computer Science Bcom with PGDCA
05 Yeas
Livelihood activities & Capacity Building Finance & Accounting Funds, Accounting, Establishment Scheme, IWDP,Audit Programming, MIS
Rs.25000/-
300000
300000
Data Entry
Rs.10000/-
120000
120000
Jisha.C.C, Data Entry Operator
05 Years
R NR 885000 3000000
4140000 3000000 4140000 3000000
4 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Nine
PPR 3 Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) functionaries 1 2 3 4 No Total no. of Names & Designation Qualification persons working in the SLDC for IWMP 1 Technical expert, PG/Ph.D in the related (Agriculture/ Field Agriculture Engineering) 2 Technical expert, B Tech. Computer (IT/Livelihood,micro Science / MCA enterprises /livelihood) 3 Administrative Officer PG in Administration / Management 4 Finance cum Accounts PG in FM / Accounts / Officer CA 5
Accounts assistants - 2 numbers
6
GIS expert
7
Data entry operator
8
Programmer
Graduation in Accounts / Commerce / Economics B Tech / M Sc / M Tech in related field Graduate+Certi ficate in DTP Diploma/Certifi cate in related fields
5 6 Experience Work allocation
7 Monthly remuneration (Rs.)
8 Total budget of SLDC (Rs.) R
10 years
50000
10 years
50000
10 years
40000
10 years
35000
5 years
25000
5 years
40000
5 years
15000
5 years
25000
NR
9 Funding expected from DoLR (Rs.) R
NR
5 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
PPR 4 Details of Functionaries in District level Watershed Cell 1 2 3 No
Name of the District
Name of the executing Agency
4
5
6
Status of Chairman
Date of signing of MoU with SLNA
Total no. of persons working for Watershed programme
1
Thiruvananthapuram
2
Kollam
3
Pathanamthitta
4
Alapuzha
5
Kottayam
6
Idukki
7
Ernakulam
Respective District
President, Respective
Three each in all districts, 52 persons in
8
Thrissur
Panchayats
District Panchayat
the State
9
Palakkad
10
Malappuram
11
Kozhikkode
12
Wayaand
13
Kannur
14
Kasaragpd
6 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
PPR 4 Details of Functionaries in District level Watershed Cell (contd…) 7
No
Names & Designation
8
Qualification
9
Experience
10
Work allocation
11
12
13
Monthly remuneration (Rs.)
Total budget of Watershed Cell (Rs.) R NR
Funding expected from DoLR (Rs.) R NR
1
Technical expert
Graduation in the related field
5 years
25000
2
Accountant
3 years
10000
3
Data entry operator
Graduation in the related field Diploma / certificate in the related field
3 years
7500 595000
7 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
II. SELECTION OF WATERSHED PROJECTS Table-PPR 5: Status of District-wise area covered under the watershed programme* (MIS Table-M(SP)2) 1 2 3 4 Micro-watersheds covered so far Total microDept. of Land Other Ministries/ watersheds in the Resources Depts. Total watersheds S. District Names of District covered Pre-IWMP projects Any other No. (DPAP +DDP +IWDP) watershed project Area Area No. Area (ha.) No. Area (ha.) No. (ha.) No. (ha.) 1
5 Net watersheds to be covered
No.
Area (ha.)
Thiruvananthapuram
182
218929
2
0
49
67025
51
67025
74
77552
State
4529
3874535
29
19345
955
1018761
983
1038991
2067
1459817
Table-PPR 6: Prioritized list of projects proposed for sanction during the financial year 2013-14* 1
2
Sl. No.
District
1
Thiruvanan thapuram
3
4 5 6 7 No. of micro Type of watersheds Proposed project Proposed Name of the proposed to project (Hilly/ cost (Rs. project be covered area (ha) Desert/ in lakh) Others) Thiruvanan thapuramIWMP-IV2013-14
3
5426
Plains
651.12
8 Weightage under the criteria# 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 13 Total
7.5
5
0
10
2
0
15
5
10
10
10
5
0
79.5
* From column no. 2, total no. of districts, from column no. 3, total no. of projects selected for sanction, from column no. 4, total no. of microwatersheds to be covered, from column no. 5, total project area proposed, from column no. 7, total cost proposed, may be indicated for the entire State at the end of the table.
8 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
# Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed Sl. No. i
Criteria
Ranges & scores Above 80 % (10)
80 to 50 % (7.5)
50 to 20 % (5)
10 5
More than 40 % (10) Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)
Less than 20 % (3)
10
More than 80 % (10)
5 15
Critical (3) -33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block 80 to 90 % (10)
Sub critical (2) 0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block 70 to 80% (5)
Safe (0)
15
Over exploited (5) -66.7 & below (15) DDP Block More than 90 % (15)
viii
% of small and marginal farmers Ground water status Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block Area under rain-fed agriculture Drinking water
20 to 40 % (5) Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0) 50 to 80 % (5)
10
No source (10)
Problematic village (7.5)
Partially covered (5)
Fully covered (0)
ix
Degraded land
15
High – above 20 % (15)
x
Productivity potential of the land
15
Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)
Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)
xi
Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated
10
Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)
Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)
xii
Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous microwatersheds in the project) Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15
Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)
Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5) Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5) Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0) 2 to 4 microwatersheds in cluster (5)
Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)
3 to 5 microwatersheds in cluster (10)
2 to 3 microwatersheds in cluster (5)
ii iii
iv v vi vii
Poverty index (% of poor to population) % of SC/ ST population Actual wages
Maximum score 10
Below 20 % (2.5)
Less than 50 % (3)
Above 70 % (Reject)
9 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
III) PROJECT WISE PROFILE OF THE SELECTED WATERSHED PROJECT Table –PPR 7: Project at a Glance 1
Name of the State
2
Name & type# (Hilly/ Desert/ Others) of the project
3
Name of the District
Thiruvananthapuram
4
Names of the Block
Kilimanoor
5
Names of Grama Panchayats
6
Names & Census Code of Villages covered
7
8
Names & Codes of the micro-watersheds
Four major reasons for selection of watershed
Kerala IWMP 4
0
Plain
Kilimanoor Karavaram Nagaroor Madavoor Pulimathu Pazhayakunnummel Koduvazhannoor 00128500 Kilimanoor 00128200 Madavoor 00127900 Vellalloor 00128100 Karavaram 00128700 Nagaroor 00128600 Pazhayakunnumel 00128300 Nagaroor 4V6a Koduvazhannur 4V7a Choottayil 4V7b Poor socio-economic condition of people Low productivity of land 10 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Strong presence of SC/ ST, BPL families and marginal farmers Poor adaptation to climate change 5426.60
9
Area of the Project (ha.)
10
Area proposed to be treated (ha.)
5426.60
11
Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs)
651.12
12
Name and Address of proposed PIA
13
Any other (please specify)
Kilimanoor Block Panchayat
Table-PPR 8: Details of previously identified DPAP/ DDP areas proposed under IWMP (ha) during the financial year* (There are no DPAP/DDP blocks identified in Kerala)
11 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table-PPR 9: Land Use pattern of the project* (Area in ha) 1
2
3
S. No.
Code of watersheds
Names of villages
1
4V6a
2
4V7a
3
4V7b
Koduvazhannoor Kilimanoor Madavoor Vellalloor Nagaroor Karavaram Nagaroor Koduvazhannoor Kilimanoor Pazhayakunnumel Kilimanoor
4 Geographical Area of the Watersheds
5 Forest Area
6 Land under agricultural use
7
8
Rainfed area
Permanent pastures
9 Wasteland NonCultivable cultivable
2912.32
0
2774.41
2774.41
0
14.37
0
835.28
0
789.6
789.6
0
0
0
1679.00
0
1521.12
1521.12
0
20.09
0
Source of data: Land Use Board * From column no. 2, total no. of microwatersheds, from column no. 3, total no. of villages, from column no. 4 to 9, totals, may be indicated for the project at the end of the table.
12 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
IV. AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITION Details about soil types, land uses etc. are given as additional tables Table – PPR 10: Details of Agro-climatic condition* 1
2
3
5
7
8
Sl. No.
Name of the Watershed
Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area
Names of the villages
Topography#
Average rainfall in mm
Southern midland zone
Koduvazhannoor , Kilimanoor, Madavoor, Vellalloor, Nagaroor , Karavaram
Narrow valleys, Hills with steep gradients, Steep slopes Narrow valleys, Hills with steep gradients, Steep slopes Narrow valleys, Hills with steep gradients, Steep slopes
1
4V6a
2
4V7a
Southern midland zone
Nagaroor, Koduvazhannoor, Kilimanoor
3
4V7b
Southern midland zone
Pazhayakunnumel, Kilimanoor
1923
* From column no. 5, total no. of villages, from column no. 6, total area, from column no. 9, total no. of crops and total cropped area, may be indicated for the project at the end of the table. # Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope
13 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table – PPR 10 a: Details of soil types and major crops
1
2
Sl. No.
Code of the watershed
1
6 Major soil types
9 Major crops
K09
K12
Total
Coconut
Paddy
Mixed
Rubber
Total
4V6a
273.23
2639.09
2912.32
931.6
236.85
776.97
789.1
2734.5
2
4V7a
0
835.28
835.28
47.34
60.62
432.3
240.27
780.53
3
4V7b
747.97
931.03
1679.00
477.41
106.05
501.97
402.04
1487.5
1021.20
4405.40
5426.60
1456.4
403.52
1711.24
1431.4
5002.5
Total Source of data: Land Use Board
*From column no. 5, total no. of villages, from column no. 6, total area, from column no. 9, total no. of crops and total cropped area, may be indicated for the project at the end of the table.
14 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table-PPR 11: Details of flood and drought in the project area* 1
2
3
Sl. No.
Particulars
Villages
1
Annual -
No. of villages
Flood
7
-
Drought
Not affected
Koduvazhannoor, Nagaroor
-
No. of villages
5
2
-
Name(s) of villages
2
4 Periodicity Any other (please specify)
Koduvazhannoor, Kilimanoor, Madavoor, Vellalloor, Karavaram, Nagaroor, Pazhayakunnumel
Name(s) of villages
* From column nos. 4 & 5, total no. of villages, category wise, for the project may be given at the end of the table. Table-PPR 12 : Details of soil erosion in the project area 1
2
3
Cause
Type of erosion
Area affected (ha)
4 Run off (mm/ year)
5 Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)
Water erosion a Severe b Moderate c Slight
0 5426.60 0 5426.60 0 5426.60
Sub-Total Wind erosion Total
NA
15 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
V. DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND DISTRIBUTION Growth in population during the last three census’ , per capita availability of land, sex ratio, population age group in the project area, literacy level, migration, workforce available in different sectors of the economy, demography of SC, ST, BPL and landless families in the project area in the last ten years, etc.
No
Watershed name
Area (in Ha)
Total families
Population Total
SC
ST
BPL Families
Land holding/ Family (in Ha)
1
4V6a
2912.32
8058
33679
5997
4
5371
0.36
2
4V7a
835.28
1634
6716
1189
7
1089
0.51
3
4V7b
1679.00
4212
10729
3255
12
2808
0.40
5426.60
13904
51123
10441
24
9268
Total
Growth in population during the last three census No Watershed name
1981
1991
2001
1 4V6a
26924
30780
33679
2 4V7a
5369
6138
6716
3 4V7b
8577
9805
10729
40869
46722
51123
Total
16 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
VI. LIVELIHOODS The existing scenario and the opportunities are described in the tables. One more word about capacity building activities. There is tremendous scope of these activities can be organized in the field level in a participatory manner. Of extreme importance is adaption to climate change. How an effective strategy can be developed is the very question of survival. Then comes the hands on exposure to modern agriculture practices, technologies and machines. Trainings should be imparted in such a manner that new social institutions can be created at grass root level to sustain these initiatives.
Table-PPR 13 Summary of livelihoods
No
Name of Watersheds
1
4V6a
2
4V7a
3
4V7b
Existing livelihood activities
Possible livelihood interventions under the project
Employment in construction sector, wage labour in semi skilled and unskilled activities, trading etc. are the major livelihood of the poor people now. Middle and upper class are employed in service sector, government and large private enterprises. Agriculture is not the soul income anymore. Agricultural labour is part of the employment of the poor. For the poor families another major chunk is the income from MNREGS. Lower income people also attempt animal husbandry with mixed results. More often the cash income from such activities is not sufficient due to a number of factors
Animal husbandry with strong forward and backward linkage and supporting infrastructure and initiatives at the homestead is the main possibility. high yield cows which can be milked in tandem, scientifically constructed cowshed and biogas tank, grass cultivation, training to the concerned, ensuring the availability of milking machines, soft finance, hand holding for the first few years, providing functional insurance etc, are essential for the success of the programme. Food processing at household level using locally available banana, jack fruit, mango etc. is another possibility. Rearing of backyard chicken, quail, rabbit etc. can b explored.
Current status of migration (no. of people)
337
67
107
Main reasons for migration
Lack of job opportunities in agriculture sector due to low productivity and poor income from land. This is inducing the farmer to fallow the land and search for better alternatives. As more and more people move to urban areas seeking employment, whatever rural economic activities remain gets weakened and faces a gradual demise. Only the people with ensured income or people who are unable to move remain in the villages
17 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
VII. EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES VII. (i). Expected employment related outcomes: Table-PPR 14: Employment generation Wage employment No
Watershed name
No. of mandays in '00 s SC
ST
Others Women
Self employment No. of beneficiaries
No. of beneficiaries
Total
SC
ST
Others
Women
Total
SC
ST
Others Women
Total
1
4V6a
600
0
5078
5699
11377
600
0
5078
5699
11377
360
0
1269
4560
6189
17566
2
4V7a
119
1
1009
1140
2269
119
1
1009
1140
2269
71
0
252
912
1236
3505
3
4V7b
326
1
2618
2921
5865
326
1
2618
2921
5865
195
1
654
2337
3187
9052
1044
2
8704
9761
19511 1044
2
8704
9761
19511
626
1
2176
7809
10612
30123
Total
* From column no. 2, total no. of villages, from column no. 3 & 4, category-wise totals may be given at the end of the table for the project.
18 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table-PPR 15: Details of migration from Project area
No
1
Names of the
No. of persons
No. of days per year
watersheds
migrating
of migration
4V6a
337
31995
2
4V7a
67
6380
3
4V7b
107
10193
Expected reduction in Major reasons for migrating
no. of persons migrating
Lack of opportunities in the agriculture and allied
253
sectors. Low productivity and poor income from land. Rural economic activities getting weakened. Weak
50
infrastructure and support services to agriculture. Better livelihoods. Changing life syles
80
* From column no. 2, total no. of villages; from column no. 3, total no. of persons migrating; from column no. 4, average no. of days for annual migration; from column no. 6, total expected reduction on no. of persons migrating, for the project may be given at the end of the Table.
19 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
VII. (ii). Water related outcomes: Table-PPR 16: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 1
2
3
4
No
Names of the watersheds
Sources
Pre-Project level (m)
Open wells 1
4V6a
5
4
50
47
3
2
5
4
55
53
Others - Ponds
3
2
Open wells
7
6
50
47
5
4
Bore wells Others - Ponds Open wells
2
3
4V7a
4V7b
5 Expected postproject level (m)
Bore wells
Bore wells Others - Ponds
6 Remarks This will substantially improve the drinking water availability, reduce the drudgery for fetching water But substantial steps to improve water and irrigation efficiency through the application of modern and traditional technologies is essential. There must be simultaneous initiatives to reduce the contamination of surface water and ground water
Source of data: Central Ground Water Board
20 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Table-PPR 17: Status of Drinking water* 1
2
S. No.
Codes of the watersheds
1
4V6a
2
3
4V7a
4V7b
3 Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Expected PostPre-project project 8
8
8
4
5
Quality of drinking water Pre-project
Comments
Expected Post-project Reduced concentration
The issues listed are
of total dissolved salts,
culled from varies
Turbulence, hardness,
less incidence of
studies conducted in
high iron are the
turbulence, better
the area by other
major issues
bacteriological quality
agencies. There is
observed.
etc. are the major
also a variation in
expected post project
quality issues during
benefits
different seasons.
10
10
10
* from column no. 2, total no. of villages implementing the programme, from column no. 3, average no. of months may be given at the end of the table for the entire project.
21 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
VII. (iii). Crop related outcomes: Table-PPR 18- Major crops grown and their productivity in the project area 1
2
S. No.
Name of the Crop
3
4
Current status
Expected post project status
Area (ha)
Productivity (kg/ ha)
Area (ha)
Productivity (kg/ ha)
1
Paddy
403.52
2372
415
2500
2
Coconut
1456.40
7163 nos./ha
1500
7500 nos./ha
3
Rubber
1431.40
1451
1500
1500
4
Banana
4.53
5618
5
6000
* From column no. 2, total no. of crops; from columns no. 3 & 4, total cropped area, average productivity, for the project may be given at the end of the Table.
22 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
VIII. MANDATORY CERTIFICATION 1 2
“It is certified that the State Government of Kerala will abide by the following mandatory conditions laid down by DoLR” The area of the proposed projects are not covered under assured irrigation The area of the proposed project is not covered or overlapping with any other watershed projects sanctioned by the central govt./ state govt./ autonomous bodies & others
3 4 5 6 7
The State must sign all the mandatory MoUs before implementing the project The timeframes and milestones of the projects will be followed The Budget requested for must follow the criteria laid down in the Common Guidelines, 2008 The State must release matching State Share within 15 days from release of each installment of central funds Purchase of vehicles and other equipments are not permitted and nor is construction of buildings allowed. Only purchase of computers and related software is permitted
8 9 10 11 12 13
Savings, if any, in each component of the project cost can be utilized only for activities in the Watershed works The DWDU will have one Member exclusively responsible for monitoring All works will be evaluated after each phase of completion. Fund release will depend on favourable reports received from evaluators Evaluators must include only institutions and agencies and not individuals The State and DRDA cell will furnish monitoring reports and periodical reports as desired by DoLR Composition of the WDT must be clearly spelt out and the team Members must be fully in place at the time of signing of the MoU of contract between the PIA and DRDA Cell That DRDA shall release the funds to the PIAs and the watershed committees within 15 days of receipt of the funds The Watershed Committee must be a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 At least one of the WDT Members must be a woman The Gram Sabhas of the proposed project areas have passed resolutions for people’s contribution towards WDF Resource-use agreements on the principles of equity and sustainability must be worked out among the User Groups prior to the concerned work being undertaken The DPR must give detailed justification for the proposed project duration No works on private lands will be repaired/ maintained from the WDF The PIA will start project work within three months of the receipt of first installment by DWDU/agency or else it can come under the purview of foreclosure The State will not undertake unnecessary foreclosure of the projects. In the event of foreclosure, the State will refund the amount and furnish all necessary documents as desired by DoLR. The State shall also take administrative and legal action against any defalcation, misappropriation, mis-utilization, deliberate negligence and laxity which has caused foreclosure of the project.
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Date: Signature of officer authorized by State Govt.* NAME OF OFFICER (IN CAPITAL LETTERS) DESIGNATION *Letter of Authority from Secretary of the concerned Department, authorizing the concerned officer to sign the above undertaking, should be enclosed with PPR.
23 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
IX. STATUS OF ON-GOING PROJECTS (DPAP/ DDP/ IWDP) Table- PPR 19: Details of pending UCs: Statewise* 1 2 3 4 5 6
Sl. No.
District
Project
Instal ment no.
Financial year of release of fund
Amount released (Rs. in lakh)
7 Amoun t utilized (Rs.in lakhs)
8
9
Submission of UC
Date of submission of UC
11 Pending UCs
Amount Amount (Rs. in Period (Rs. in lakhs) lakhs) 1 Thiruva TVM 1 31.03.2 27.07.2 85.72 nanthap 010 013 uram 2 TVM 2 31.03.2 27.07.2 85.72 010 013 *From column No. 2, total no. of Districts, from column No. 3, total no. of projects, from column no. 6, total amount released, from column No. 7, total amount utilized, from column No. 8, total amount due, from column no. 9, total amount for which UCs submitted, from column No. 11, total amount of the pending UCs, may be mentioned at the end of the table for the entire State. Table- PPR 20: Details of Unspent balance as on 31.07.2013: Districtwise* 4 5 1 2 3 6 S. No. 1 2
Due date
Amoun t (Rs. in lakhs)
10 Reasons for not submitting / delayed submission of UC Audit report awaited
Date
Total funds released Unspent balance (Rs. in lakh) (Rs. in lakhs) DoLR State Thiruvananthapu TVM 1 300 119.47 11.25 0.2 ram TVM 2 300 119.44 11.25 4 *From column No. 2, total no. of Districts, from column No. 3, total no. of projects, from column no.4 to 6, totals, may be mentioned at the end of the table for the entire State District
Name of the Project
Total cost (Rs. in lakh)
24 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
X. ABSTRACT OF PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR SANCTION DURING FINANCIAL YEAR 2013-14
1
Number of districts to be covered under the present proposal
2
No. of Watersheds projects proposed to be taken up under IWMP
Hilly/Desert
Others 1
3
4
5 #
Total area to be covered under proposed projects (000’ ha) (a)
Hilly & Desert areas#
(b)
Others
(c)
Total
5426.60
5426.60
Total cost of the proposed Watershed projects (Rs. in lakhs) (a)
Hilly & Desert areas#
(b)
Others
(c)
Total
651.12
651.12
First installment required from central funds for the proposed watershed projects
130.23
For details refer Appendix-I
25 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
Date of meeting of PPR sanctioning Committee
:
Decision taken by the Committee
:
Date of receipt of Annual Action Plan
:
Brief details of Annual Action Plan
:
Final approval of projects/area/costs/project period
:
Amount released as first installment and date of release
:
File No.
:
26 IWMP-PPR-2013-14 - Kerala-DoLR
