Forbairt Foghlaim Fís

www. pdst. ie © PDST 2016 This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ie/. You may use and re-use this material (not including images and logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike Licence.

Politics & Society

w w w. p d st . i e

Round 2 Day 3

Learning Intentions • Participants will become familiar with learning outcomes and pedagogies for topics 2,4,5 and 6

w w w. p d st . i e

• Participants will link a minimum of 2 key thinkers with data to debate whether gender equality has been sufficiently achieved in Ireland. • Participants will share and create success criteria and questions for use in extended writing • Participants will be enabled to critique data from multiple sources

Seminar Overview Session 1 • Linking Key Thinkers with Data

9.15 – 11.00 11.00 – 11.15 Session 2

w w w. p d st . i e

11.15 – 13.00 13.00 – 13.45 Session 3 13.45 – 15.30

Coffee • Teacher Creation of Rubrics/Success Criteria • Exploring Extended Responses Lunch • Critiquing Data • Teacher Sharing • Revisiting the Specification

w w w. p d st . i e

Essential Question “…blatant, intentional discrimination against

w w w. p d st . i e

women is far from being something merely to be read about in history books” (Fine,2010) Agree or disagree with this statement using appropriate data and integrating at least two relevant Key Thinkers.

Marginalisation Who?

UNDHR

Data

Walby

Lynch

Nussbaum

w w w. p d st . i e

“blatant, intentional discrimination against women is far from being something merely to be read about in history books” (Fine, 2010)

w w w. p d st . i e

Coffee Break

w w w. p d st . i e

What am I looking for?

w w w. p d st . i e

w w w. p d st . i e

w w w. p d st . i e

Bias, Reliability and Validity

w w w. p d st . i e

Sharing of Resources

w w w. p d st . i e

Learning Outcomes

w w w. p d st . i e