References Perception – Production Link: Classical Perspectives V. Ramasubramanian Basic Perception Theory Liberman, A.M. Some results of research on speech perception. JASA, 1957, 29, 117-123. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. The perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 431-461. Liberman, A.M. On the finding that speech is special. American Psychologist, 1982, 37, 148-167. Liberman, A.M. & Mattingly, I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 1985, 21, 136. Alvin M. Liberman and I. G. Mattingly, “A Specialization for Speech Perception”, Science, vol. 243, pp. 489494, Jan 1989. Fowler, C.A. An event approach to the study of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 1986, 14, 3-28. Stevens, K.N. (2002). "Toward a model of lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (4): 1872–1891. McGurk, H., & McDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264(5588), 746-748. C. A. Fowler et al., “Motor theories of perception”, in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, pp. 705-707, MIT Press, 2003.
Categorical perception Liberman, A.M., Harris, K.S., Hoffman, H.S. & Griffith, B.C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 358-368. Robert L. Goldstone and Andrew T. Hendrickson, “Categorical perception”, Advanced Review, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 69–78, January/February 2010.
Analysis-by-Synthesis Stevens, K.N. Toward a model for speech recognition. JASA, 1960, 32, 47-55. Halle, M., & Stevens, K. N. (1962). Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. IRE Transactions of the PGIT, IT-8, 155-159. Stevens, K.N. & Halle, M. Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In W. Wathen-Dunn (Ed.), Models for the perception of speech and visual form (1967).
Thomas G. Bever and David Poeppel, “Analysis by Synthesis: A (Re-) Emerging Program of Research for Language and Vision”, Biolinguistics, 4.2–3: 174–200, 2010. David Poeppel and Philip J. Monahan, “Feedforward and feedback in speech perception: Revisiting analysis by synthesis”, LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 26 (7), pp. 935-951, 2011. Yuille, A. and Kersten, D. (2006). “Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis?”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 301-308. K. K. Paliwal and P. V. S. Rao, “Synthesis-based recognition of continuous speech”, JASA 71(4), pp. 10161024, Apr 1982. B. R. Thosar and P. V. S. Rao, “An approach towards a synthesis-based speech recognition system”, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-24, pp. 194-196, 1976.
Mirror Neurons Gregory Hickok, “The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition”, W. W. Norton & Company, NY, Aug 2014. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L. and Rizzolatti G., “Action recognition in the premotor cortex”, Brain, 119 (Pt 2), 593-609, 1996. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., 1992. “Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study”, Exp. Brain Res. 91 (1), 176–180. Marco Iacoboni, “The role of premotor cortex in speech perception: Evidence from fMRI and rTMS”, Journal of Physiology - Paris 102, 31–34, 2008. Wilson, S.M., Saygin, A.P., Sereno, M.I., Iacoboni, M., 2004. “Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production”, Nat. Neurosci. 7 (7), 701–702. Gregory Hickok, “The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics”, Language and Cognitive Processes, Spl issue: Cognitive Neuroscience of Language, vol. 25, issue 6, pp. 749-776, Mar 2010. J.M. Kilner and R.N. Lemon, “What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons”, Current Biology 23, R1057– R1062, December 2, 2013 ª2013 Elsevier Ltd.
