CHRISTOPHER A. SWINIARSKI Direct Dial: 603.628.1322 Email:
[email protected] Admitted in NH and MA 900 Elm Street, P.O. Box 326 Manchester, NH 03105-0326 T 603.625.6464 F 603.625.5650
January 9, 2017 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Rebecca Oldham, Staff Planner Town of North Andover 120Main Street North Andover, MA 01845 Re:
Request for Minor Special Permit Modification – Installation of Verizon Wireless Small Cell Antennae on Existing Utility Poles
Applicant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”)
Location / Address:
Utility Pole # MECO 3894 / VZ 141-52 located in public right of way at approximately 660 Chickering Road (“SC07”)
Special Permit Application
Submitted July 12, 2016 and Granted September 6, 2016
Hello Ms. Oldham: The purpose of this letter is to serve as Verizon Wireless’ formal request for a modification to the above-referenced special permit application. Specifically, the modification requested is to include the above-referenced utility pole attachment as an addition to the special permit above. In support of this request for modification to the above-referenced special permit, please find enclosed the following materials and documents for your review and consideration: 1. Revised 11” x 17” copy of the plans showing the requested attachment; 2. Letter of Authorization from National Grid, the pole owner; and 3. Radiation Safety Report for the new location and equipment, conducted by Donald L. Haes, Jr., Ph. D. As previously discussed, we would greatly appreciate being placed on the January 17th planning board agenda for the minor modification referenced herein. We sincerely appreciate your
Ms. Oldam, Staff Planner January 9, 2017 Page 2 willingness to hear these requests. Should you have any questions prior to the January 17th meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me directly with the same.
Sincerely,
Christopher A. Swiniarski CSW:tph
105032\11654701
E
660 CHICKERING ROAD, NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 gx t¡J l¡J
N. ANDOVER MA SC31
(r, l¡.1
ldco Co
TMECO
Pole Numbar
3894 \Z
ÍMECO 3494
Elætdc Co Pol. #
1
04-1 05
12'1?
I a
lt
W
I
OO-21-
I ç
!
71' 07' 05-69'
-' J
.Y:yþ
lt .',i
a
etücðñ6r.ffiw
Ê Þdffi
i¡: j_rj:l
a al
FROX
3&¡4 \¡,2
ES
1{l/52
I
z
EOUFYff
ÐûsTrNG UlnrTY
YZ
a
dI9ING UNLÍrl
111
Pûr
/â2
TXECO 3891
(J
C,
ÆPRryÐ ry:
OPH
SUBMITTALS
l¿t
ffi f$
2lruJlrl@FtM I lÉâ^.lmm
$*
\
ln l¡
Í$
-'rrài
N.
'4ie
ANDOVER MA c^al
101
&¿,.
sffi:
'aa
860 CHICKERING ROAD LlA 01845 ^t{oovER.
NOlltì , î¡lrL'ac.ìil
ffiru
EÃe-rl
KIY 1
PLAN
{48'
-r-1.-
u'iûËË
flEL-D TNSFECI|ON
ÆPROXIUTE
å
CæRDIMM:
0ATÉ 09-07-2016
un LONG:
ñ42 42' 00.24' w71'07'O5.æ'
*FNffi
L-1
snucruwrcE: I. FROp06ED |¡SìEE (r) Æ{IEX[ Et{cLosED rr 21€'rù(7.87't
^[s.L
NISÎER
11€'-0'l À[s.L
AWEß
OF
NE æÆW
ffi M
DilWNGS ARE SUBJEO TO OUTCOilE OF A SUflUilL
CilGE PENOINC MìGIS.
2. SHOP OilUNGS OF NW EmNSION NO/OR NTENM UOUm TO BE PROVOEO IO EXG¡NEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO
4'-O'¡r
MEffiR
o
ñiS-æ-Pr,$¡
rs oÁGRilMTrc rN MTURE 10 PROVIDE GENERI INrcRUTION REGARONE ÎhÊ LOäÎON ND
T
AND IS INTENDED
SIE
OF THE PROPOSED URELESS
cwÍuNtaroN
F^ctury. rhE stTE urcuT BE NNruZEO UPON COMPffiON OF Sl]E SURIEI AND F¡CILT DESIGN.
coNmumoN.
IffiUI,AfOR ON CRGS ARÍ
ts
lffEmBtn
OF THE
EXISTING SIRUCruRE TO SUPMM NE PROPOSED LOADING BEEN COXPI-EIED HUDSON DESIGN GROUP. LLC.
F/
SruD ^
FROÊOSED
AN
cæRorMm: ^PPROX¡UtE
W: LONG:
t12
xt¡¡
w[
UJ
(tt
ñ
12', OO.21'
wl'07'05-69"
Hudson
A.G.L
Drdgñ
ELry. =
e*c
þ 142'-2"+
A.M.S.L
139'-6"1
A.M.S.L
13J'-4"Ì
A.M.S.L
8[Nðffi.sftm N,MR &0¡&!
ÉrÞ7qS7S
SECONDARY POWER
PROPOSÐ TESSEE
EXISIING
(l) IEAlìrñiE¡D
STREfl LIGHT
A.G.L A.M.S,L
ELry. =
{ -t
ELcV. =
126
-3"r
A.M.S.L
124
-8 t
A.M.S.L
le
w
PROPGED TESSEE
124'-6"t
A.M.S.L
*
À.G.1 A.M.S.L
PROPoSÐ nSER
124'-O
(r) t2
R^IED
t'ym.
CoPPER GRoTJND *tRE
rc
CONNECTED
Ë
u-djrRo usEo ìrnH nÊ ngt c¡pÆL¡
PñOR TO CO{StîUCîoil.) ^t{fo{¡t^
(FRO{t}ilr- & 8Acl+r UL) PROPGED I.ESSEÊ
(l)
(¡clDc co{\ERfER)
(r)
rÊSSEr RÊI/OÌE R¡O|O tNsrDE sRÁcKÐ
(s R)
(¡ôL)
ANDOVER MA 1
a'-ß'
ËXISTING UIIL'ry
(ÆL)
#MECO 3A91 VZ 141/52
103'-0"+
DPH
SUBMITTALS
sc3
EQIJIffi
6æ CHtCffitNG RO^D U OIEÆ
CoNDUTT
TESSEE
TIORIH NDOVER,
(I
INffi
A.G,L A.U.S.L
ÁPPROVED BY:
N.
tÕ nÊ
moF
MD[tr
F
TCGREGAIION
fl
PROPG¡Ð
[fïl{
HEÁO
TINITUT
1-1l4"
|¡OOEL
EXiSIING CUY WRES
Eilq.E PIUS€
FMPGED IElsEE (1) SERT¡E
EXTSTING
\¡
r{ 2'
VÉHFY PK)PoSEo
(t{sI t llD
FIBER
^WG
a\
PROFGED
PROPCED
E}ISTING CÆLE
Fvc
ffiru ELEVATION
PRæOSED OR CIPFER c[.Al)
*'rrE
&
GRCIJND ROD, V.I.F.
-cB¡eHc_scÁtE
0 1'-1'2'{' !1xl7 Sffi
1'-0'
---=¡
5'-1j
E'{'
L-2
PHOTO
ts
LæE æIBIT: j_ts É^sE u
TO
INFORUTION RÊtrDING ftE LOCATON SEE OF NE PROPOSEO WRELESS
GUY WIRE
EXTSTING CONDUIT
BE flNruZED UPON æÍPT.ENON OF SllE SUffi AND FÆIN OßßN.
Ës rã 3g O(J
1-1l4"
1.
Tô
A
MLì€IS OF 'IHE CAPÁCTY OF lHE EXISIING SIRU TURE TO SUPPORT'I}IE PROPOSED LOÅD¡NG HÁS NOI BEEX COIIPIETÊD BY HUDSON DESIGN 6ROUP, L].C. DRAWNGS ARE SU&Efr TO CilNCE PEilDING OUTCOME OF A STRUCTUro
2. SHOP DRAWilGS OF NW EÆNSION ND/OR ANIENN^ MOUtrT TO BE PROVDÊD TO ENGINEER OF RECORD PRþR 10
t¡¡
Hffiþ l@Gþrot¡,tmm E pqs?s ¡AX p4!J¿g N.¡&VR M^otß
æilgTRUfiON.
(1) rElER
ELECTRICAL
EOGE OF OF PAVËMENI
22ú4 11r17
120-20EV, I-PHÀSE. 3 WRE: USÊ MII.EÁNK tilOOEL NO.: UsE1E-RL.2OOS METER SOCKE¡ WÍT}I RFTH ]ERMIML KfT KsT
-GBAEHIC.ICÀ-E
o 8' -t'
RRH PLAN
2'{'
1
Sru: Sru:
NOIES:
120-240V. 1-PHASE. 3 WRE: USE MllßÁNX M00ÊL NO.l us818-RL-200S MFIER SoCKÉÌ
FLOW OF TRAFFIC
"-4Jç;
I
Ø
MEIS.
I
xt¡¡ l¡J
snumF&rcE:
FROPOSED
.-
AD
ciliuNtcåÎoN FÆtffi. nE srE uYow wt[
9a
EXISTING UNLIry POLE #MECO 3894 vZ
o
ts ohcR$Mnc N NATURÊ PRilDE GENEro
ND IS INNNDÐ
----¡
{{' NÎENNA
(2)
,r' cw ffiEs
SECONDARY POVIER UNES
7,A1'a
ilTD
2- W
CAALES Æ{D AISG CABL-E
RBER
FrcMWL
&
2,,.
frfr
(1)
FAER
SHROUD
ON
MLE
'f
co. TrE
rNs)
-
SAC(HAUL
tretæ
=.-.;-l
HilD (mW r0' coNDucfoRs FoR
U-GUÆD
CW
ÆPROVÊD
il:
DPH
SUBMITTALS
W
16 Aw6 wRE MtN- SCH- { RAED å¡C
rN
flBER
,á' M
CAAI-ES
(1)
¡
sm..ffi Uæm
M
PUTE)
r
ll
ÆSÈKY
)
ROUÎER
RRH
^r,s
RBER JUilPER (TYP.)
¿ H
-,. PrrrE)
AWAËt ìrcU{r FOR t{O-E RAæNACXET
2
Aß
RRH ilCK W, sl rÞÞ¡ rFn H&DWÂF
ffiLt - Z7¡J ¡2 - la 6 - 5r.€ LAS - r4.r'ka¡'vh¡.5t - 14.1 lrs 2.CIr13'Ìl¡10'D -
(1) ¡ürs RRH - 253ït12'Y*7.rb
(2) (1)
RgcÍFtER ROutER
IåIN DISONNEfr METER
sc31 (Ì/F.)
CON\ÆRTER)
PCLE/ì4'ALI.
(lJ Snq ñ
ANDOVER MA
Am coæËR
(1) REõNER (ACIDC
wnE-888COilSIFtCnOl{ NC.
N.
R
æ ryER
w/
(1)
strcH
6U ruSED
l
660 CHICKERIilê ROAD NORTH ¡¡{DOVER. I¡A 01E15
ÑD AWG COPFm
EÉCfRrCÅ ilOtES)
EQUIPMENT DETAILS
uvilmm æPPER
ôMUND
ROD
ffi¡ffi
ce¡¡en¡twrutc o¡eon¡u - s¡1,¡cu nnx
s*É
x.r.s
--------Elò
L-3
ts
o
[!! Fæ
r* #.¿ eániB
d
s,ll&
@
^**"
ûrùr Á#dd
tq¡h6
FJI l
Tatte 6H.3. Iúeaning ol
Leb
ñ
Cod$ onTyp¡cãl Appl¡etion D¡agram¡
lu
(t, t¡J
@
r::l
Þ
r6
BEI
L* F m
\\\\\
h$r
Èrt $r ãrr ó¡.
[g
&
¡s¡s"bn¡Ñ¡q.*h
ûhã.t L .@Lódód w " ffiüdtuiñh S =Nds#¡ntordÊd8srÞærcs& Fdpddro6Á6brhq d fio.ú@ìd
sÈú 6qdy b h deñb.. ry hbhw ô6q túe \cdhF À.3.dc ûrtuô¡fhær¡,þmi cry*6F,r ãù@rmÞr¡døc@¡d rñr8dñM ¡hduÈMdrFnb.tud ñrodñGþnbhcituèbù-nû..Mcóc6kcøø¡ ùh. fr&ñ,!ù.rþnh! 'øú4d. tu&nùûrh¡rbddûrbtu'rrcdo th.'Fd&n'ßñ.ùotur6rùñd'F Ìfcbß.) oÙtóft
nsossb iffffiffl** *no,,,*
wÅ
frÌffi
lffi,i.i:g,s:lÍi.
DOWNSTREAM
TAPTR
100 FT (J0 m)
W1
Wl-4R WORK
[,lAX
ZONE
_41 w5-1
BUFFER
D p
A .1
rl þ
a
a
a
t
a
a a
I
.laa
a
aaa¡aal¡'
-a
I
CHECKED gYi
ÆFRWED
a
t
JX
ry:
oPr
SUBMITTALS
-)
þ
B
A
L/2
BUFFTR N.
ANDOVER MA
sc31
sffi
w1*4R
Wl
*41
660 CHTCKtr|NG NORTH NDOVER,
m
M
OIE45
ffiru WORK ZONE SAFETY TRAFTIC PLAN
w5-'1 $FNtÆ
wonx zo¡¡e s¡rewrmr¡rc pr-rr SüE: N.T.S -- -----_1@
lî\
L-4
nationalgrid
Amy Sulllvan $enbrAnalyst Ouldoor Llghlfng snd Atlachmenls
October 20,2Ol5
Attentlon :Stðte and Municipal Permítting Authorlties
RE: Evldence of Pole Attachment Agreement and Consent to File
for
Permits Granted to Verlzon Wlrclcss
To Whom lt May Concern:
The undersignediointly owns and controls certa¡n utility poles in public rþhts-of-way and on
private property throughout the geographíc areas where it operates. Please be advised that the undersigned has entered into a Pole Attachment Agreement
{"Agreement'} authorizing Verizon Wireless ("Applícant"}to ¡nstell,attach, malntain, repair, upgrade and usewirelesscommunlcations equipmentand appurtenances on certain utility poles pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Permisslon is hereby granted to Applicånt, or its atents, to make appllcation for any Land Use, Access, Euilding, Electr¡cal or Regulatory Permit(s| required to
effectuate the initial installatlon, on-going mð¡ntenance and upgrades or replacements of sald equipment.
Please
me at (78f1 907-3252 lf you have any questlons.
40 Sylvan Road - Waltham, MA 02451 T: 781-907-3252 email: /lmy.sullivanttlinationalrrid.com www.nationalgrid.com
Dorutn L. HAES, JR., PH.D., CHP Radiation Safety Specialist MA Radiation Control Program Health Physics Services Provider Registration #65-0017 PO Box 198, Hampstead, NH
03841
603-303-9959
Email: [email protected]
December 31,2016
RE: Proposed installation of radio base station antenna and associated equipment for the Verizon Wireless Small Cell Personal Wireless Services facitity to be located on a utility pole located near 660 Chickering Road, North Andover, MA.
Punposr I have reviewed the information pertinent to the Verizon Wireless proposed installation of
a small cell (SC) personal wireless services (PWS) facility within North Andover, MA. To determine regulatory compliance, theoretical calculations of maximal radio-frequency (RF) fields have been prepared, The physical conditions a¡e that Verizon Wireless proposes to install a PWS
omni-directional canister type antenna on an existing utilitypole near 660 Chickering Road, North Andover,
MA.
The antenna arrangement will include a single canister antenna on an existing
utility pole and a remote radio head (RRH). The mounting centerline height of the antenna is proposed to be 45' above ground level (AGL). This report provides written proof that the proposed facility would comply with the FCC RF exposure guidelines, including residential areas and in the surrounding neighborhood. This report considers the contributions of the Verizon Wireless PWS transmitters operating
capacity. The calculated values of RF fields are presented as a percent of current Maximum Permissible Exposures (%MPE) as adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC),"ii and those established by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH).iii at theirproposed
Suuvr.my Theoretical RF field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed Verizon Wireless RF contributions would be well within the established RF exposure guidelines at the proposed site; see Figure
3.
These results indicate there could be many more similar installations
at this location, and still be within Federal and State guidelines for RF exposure. This report provides written proof that the proposed facility would comply with the FCC RF exposure guidelines, including residential areas and in the surrounding neighborhoods.
it is my expert opinion that this facility would comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure to members of the public. The antenna installations proposed by Verizon Wireless would not produce significant changes to the Based on the theoretical RF fields I have calculated,
ambient RF environment.
Page
I of 10
Exposunn Lrvrrrs ANo GurnELrNEs The RF exposure guidelines adopted by the FCC are a combination of the standards published by the American National Standards lnstitute (ANSD iu and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP). u Also applicable are those published by the
MDPH.
The RF exposure guidelines are divided into two categories: "Controlled/Occupational
areas" (those areas restricted to access by RF workers only) and "Uncontrolled/Public Areas" (those areas unrestricted for public access). Listed in Table 1 below and shown in Figure 1 above are the applicable RF exposure guidelines for uncontrolled areas as they pertain to the operating
frequency band of the PWS facility.
Table 1: Maximum Permissible Exposure Values for Uncontrolled/Public Areas Maximum Permissible Exposure: f ll.5 in pWcm2
Frequency Band: 300 - 1500 MHz 1500 - 100,000 MHz
Note: *
1000
pWcm2
-
I pW:0.000001 Watt
For equivalent plane-wave power density, where/is the frequency in MHz (106 Hz).
NOTE: FCC Solo Rule - At multiple transmitter sites, actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the RF exposure guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce RF field levels in excess of 5o/o of the applicable FCC MPEs. W$klco¡bolled Are3
PÐd¡d6¡t_ôcdhdl€d,l¡is -Cêñl
r0{0.0
r00.0
È'
E€
rl
\
10.0
\
û t.0
0.1
0.0
0
3
30
300
:,000
30,000
Frequenc¡'(llllz)
Figure 1: FCC Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Page 2
of l0
TnnonrcucAl RF Frnr,o C¡,cur,arloNs - Gnotm Lpvnr,s MnrnonoLocY These calculations are based on what are called "worst-case" estimates. That is, the estimates assume 100% use of all transmitters simultaneously. Additionally, the calculations make the assumption that the surrounding area is a flat plane. The resultant values are thus conservative
in that they over predict actual resultant power densities. The calculations are based on
the
following information for VERZON WIRELESS:
1.
2. 3.
Effective Radiated Power (ERP): See Table 2 inventory. Antenna height (centerline, above ground level (AGL) See Table 2 inventory. Antenna vertical radiation patterns; the source of the negative gain (G) values. "Omni directional" antennas are designed to focus the RF signal, resulting in "patterns" of signal loss and gain. These patterns (see APPENDIX A) display the loss of signal strength relative to the direction of propagation due to elevation angle changes. Note: G is a unitless factor usually expressed in decibels (dB); where G For example: for an antenna gøin of 3 dB, the net factor (G) For an antenna /oss of -3 dB, the net factor (G)
:
10
(3/10)
:
:
10
Qt10)
:
10
(dB/10).
:2.
9.5.
To determine the magnitude of the RF field, the power density (S) from an isotropic RF source is calculated, making use of the power density formula as outlined in FCC's OET Bulletin 65, Edition
S:
97-0I:'i
P. G 4. n. N
Where:
P'G
P -+ Powerto antenna (watts) G -+ Gain of antenna R -+ Distance (range) from antenna source to point of intersection with the ground (feet) R2: lHeigtrg2 + lHorizontal distance)2
:
EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power) for broadcast antennas, the equation can be presented in the following form: Since:
S=
-EIBE4. r¡. R2 In the situation of off-axis power density calculations, apply the negative elevation gain (G
E)
value from the vertical radiation patterns with the following formula:
S= EIRP. GE 4. n. R2
Page 3
of l0
Ground reflections may add in-phase with the direct wave, and essentially double the electric field
intensity. Because power density is proportional to the square of the electric field, the power density may quadruple, that is, increase by a factor of four (4). Since ERP is routinely used, it is necessary to convert ERP into EIRP; this is readily done by multiplying the ERP by the factor of I.64, which is the gain of a halÊwave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. Therefore, downrange power density estimates can be calculated by using the formula: S=
4'
(ERP' 1.64). GE 4' ¡r. R2
=
ERP. 1.64. GE ø. F
:
0.522. ERP. GE
p
To calculatetheo/o MPE, use the formula:
o/oiMPE:
Å
.
loo
MPE
ANrnmN¿. INsr¡,r,r,¡.TIoN
Loc¡,rroN
The proposed utility pole which would host a Verizon Wireless SC antenna is shown below in Figure 2. The latitude and longitude are listed in Table2.
Figure 2: Utility Pole (center) near 660 Chickering Road, North Andover, MA Which Would Host A Verizon Wireless SC Antenna
Page 4
of l0
The results of the percent Maximum Permissible Exposure (%MPE) calculations for the summation of the proposed Verizon Wireless contributions are depicted in Figure 3 as plotted against linear distance from the base of the utility pole. The values have been calculated for a height of six feet above ground level in accordance with regulatory rationale. In addition to the six-foot height, and depicted
on the graph for reference only, values have been plotted for a height
comparison with a typical two-story structure.
of
16 feet above ground level
for
A logarithmic scale was used to plot the calculated
theoretical %MPE values in order to compare with the MPE of l00yo, which is so much larger that it would be off the page in a linear plot. The curves in the figure resemble a straight-line on the log-linear plots at distances beyond about one thousand feet. Within that distance, the curves are variable due to the application of the vertical radiation patterns.
OnsrRvanroNs rN CoNsmrn¡,uoN
wrru
FCC Rur,ps $1.1307(n) & $1.1310
Is it physically possible to stand next to or touch any omni-directional antenna? No, access to the
utility pole is restricted, and the utility companies will adhere to RF safety guidelines regarding potential access to the proposed PWS antennas mounted on the pole.
ANrnrw¡, I¡næNronv
Table 2: Proposed Verizon Wireless Antenna Inventory Utilify Pole near 660 Chickering Road, North Andover, MA Parameters: 1072watts ERP* of AWS
Latitude Longitude
Site Name
North Andover
MA
SC31
@2150ll{Hz
Antenna Centerline
420 42',00.24" N -71" 0'7'05.69" W
(AcL) 45',
Antenna Model
NH360QM-DG
Information relevant to the antenna proposed by Verizon Wireless Appendix A.
Table Notes: AWS: Advanced Wireless Services * ERP
:
Power out per channel (CH) X # channels per remote radio head (RRH) X #RRHs X gain the
antenna provides
within that frequency band.
Page 5
of
l0
The results of the RF field calculations for the summation of the proposed Verizon Wireless AWS
technologies are depicted in Figure 3.
- -.16! {Gr.
-,{GL
1m0.00%
-Itr¡EOvd'lE.)
-l'ntEühblic)
-d
100_00%
10.00% 9,I¡
IVIPE 0.90% 1.00% 0.50%
0t0%
, ì tt
a
0.0t% 0
500
lmo
ls{n
2000
25{X}
3m0
I)isfance ftom Brse pretl
Figure 3: Theoretical RF field calculations for the summation of the proposed Verizon Wireless Small Cell Antenna Site "North Andover MA SC31"; Near 660 Chickering Roado North Andover, MA
Page 6 of 10
CoNcr.usroN Theoretical RF field calculations data indicate the summation of the proposed Verizon Wireless
RF contributions would be well within the established RF exposure guidelines at the proposed site; see Figure 3. These results indicate there could be many more similar installations at this location, and still be within Federal and St¿te guidelines for RF exposure. This report provides written proof that the proposed facility would comply with the FCC RF exposure guidelines, including residential areas and in the surrounding neighborhoods. The number and duration of calls passing through PWS facilities cannot be accurately predicted. Thus, in order to estimate the highest RF fields possible from operation of these installations, the maximal amount of usage was considered. Even in this so-called "worst-case", the resultant increase in RF field levels arc far below established levels considered safe. Based on the theoretical RF fields I have calculated, it is my expert opinion that this facility would
comply with all regulatory guidelines for RF exposure to members of the public. The antenna installations proposed by Verizon Wireless would not produce significant changes to the ambient RF environment. Feel free to contact me
if you have
any questions.
Sincerely
Donald L. Haes, Jr.,
.D
Certified Health Physicist
Note: The analyses, conclusions and professional opinions are based upon the precise parameters and conditions ofthese particular sites; Utility pole near
660 Chickering Road, North Andover, MA. Utilization of these anaþes, conclusions and professional opinions for any personal wireless services installation, existing or proposed, other than the aforementioned has not been sanctioned by the author, and therefore should not be accepted as evidence regulatory compliance. Page 7
of
of l0
APPENDIX A
-ls'l
.:1.ñ
-a
Lj
:
l
:-i
bi
tl
1^,
::l it
i-1
i,
::i ¡
:,1;
J
i{
¿*,
-¡
::i
!t,
;::,
:-'
Composite Vertical Radiation Patterns for Proposed Small Cell Omni Antenna For Specific Verizon \Mireless Proposed AWS Frequencies
Page 8
of
10
Dox¿n L. HAES, JR., PH.D., CHP Radiation S afe ty Sp e ciali s t MA Radiation Control Program Health Physics Services Provider Registration #65-0017 PO Box 198, Hampstead, NH
03841
603-303-9959
Email: [email protected]
SrarnvrnNT oF CnnrrrrcATroN 1
I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2.
The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited onlyby the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions and conclusions.
3
I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.
4.
My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined energy level or direction in energy level that favors the cause of the client, the amount of energy level estimate, the attainment of a stþlated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event.
5
This assignment was not based on a requested minimum environmental energy level or specific power density.
6
My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions, or conclusions in, or the use of, this report.
7
The consultant has accepted this assessment assignment having the knowledge and experience necessary to complete the assignment competently.
8.
My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the American Board of Health Physics (ABHP) statements of standards of professional responsibility for Certified Health Physicists.
Date: December 31. 2016
Donald L. Haes, Jr., C e rti,fì e d He a I t h P hys
i c is
t
Page 9
of
l0
EN¡Norrs
i.
Federal Register, Federal Communications Commission Rules; Radiofrequency radiation; environmental effects evøluøtion guidelines Volume l, No. 153,41006-41199, August 7,1996. (47 CFR Part 1; Federal Communications Commission). ii. Telecommunications Act
of 1996,47
USC; Second Session of the 104&Congress of the United States
of America, January 3,1996. 105 CMR 122.000: Massachusetts Deparhnent of Public Health, Non-Ionizing Radiation Limits þr: The General Public from Non-Occupational Exposure to Electromøgnetic Fields, Employees from Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields, and Exposurefrom Microwave Ovens.
"'.
tu. eNSVtgEE C95.1-1999: American National Standard, Sof"ty levels with respect to humøn exposure to rødio frequency electromagnetic fields, from 3 KHz to 300 GHz (Updated in 2010). ". National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP); Biological Effects and Exposure
Criteriafor Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report 86, 1986. ui. OET Bulletin 65: Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Fields; Edition 97-01, August 1999.
Page 10
of10
