1. Skit Competition 1. Grades of contestant: Grade 1 – 6, 7 – 9 and 10 -12 2. Team of 5 students /Grade/School 3. Rules and regulations 3.1 Each team must make 5 copies of their scripts for 5 judges. 3.2 Each team must draw for the ordinal number of each show. 3.3 Time of Competition: Grade Grade 1 – 6 Grade 7 – 9, 10 - 12

Time 7 minutes ± 30 seconds 10 minutes ± 30 seconds

Remark If spend more or less than allocated time, every 30 seconds more or less will be given a point deduction.

4. Props 4.1 Sets and Props should be easily movable and not bigger than 3 × 1.8 meters. 4.2 Microphone, electronic gadget and sound effect are not allowed. 4.3 Outsider are not allowed to be back stage. 5. Judging Criteria (Total Score: 100) 5.1 Acting - Characterization of Each role - Use of voice, energy levels - Movement and Gesture Ability - Use of Stage Space 5.2 Content and Language Competence - Language Accuracy (Structure and Vocabulary) - Performance is relevant to the theme - Pronunciation - Fluency - Moral of the story 5.3 Production - Method of Performance - Orchestration-grouping - Adherence to time limit - Performance Plan - Strength of ensemble (Teamwork)

30 points 10 points 5 points 10 points 5 points 40 points 10 points 10 points 5 points 10 points 5 points 20 points 4 points 4 points 4 points 4 points 4 points

5.4 Stage Presentation - Costumes - Props and Performance Crafts 6. Judgments and Award 80 – 100 points 70 – 79 points 60 – 69 points Lower than 60 points

10 points 5 points 5 points

Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Certificate of participation

7. The judges’ decision is final. 8. Judges 8.1 Qualification - 1 Native and 1 Non-Native speaker - 3 Thai Teachers who are fluent in English 8.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 8.3 Remarks - Judges from the same school as the contestants shall not judge them. - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service areas 9. Committee 9.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors 9.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform and enforce rules and regulations 9.3 A time keeper 9.4 A caretaker of the skit team 10. Venue Criteria: 10.1 Registration point 10.2 Dressing room should be prepared

10.3 Competition room prepared as following: - Microphone - Judge’s desk - Seat for the audience - Stage 11. Remarks Audience is allowed. Photo, video recording, voice recording also are not allowed. Audience to be asked to remain seated and quiet for the duration of the performance.

2. Story-telling Contest 1. Grade of contestant: Grade 1 – 3, 4 - 6, 7 – 9 and 10 -12 2. Category and numbers: Individual; 1 contestant for each grade/school 3. Time of Competition: Grade Grade 1 – 3 Grade 4 – 6 Grade 7 – 9

Time 3 - 4 minutes (± 30 seconds) 4 – 5 minutes (± 30 seconds ) 6 – 7 minutes(± 30 seconds )

Grade 10 – 12

7 – 8 minutes(± 30 seconds)

Story The story should be Thai or other countries folktales or Aesop fables

4. Regulations: 4.1 Contestants to wear their school uniform. No tools or equipment are allowed. 4.2 Each contestant must make 5 copies of their script for 5 judges before the competition starts. 5. Judging Criteria 5.1 Content 35 points - Interesting and suitable content for that age level 15 points - Correct story-telling style/form and organizing 10 points - The moral of the story 10 points 5.2 Language Competence 60 points - Using correct vocabulary and structure, suitable for their age level 20 points - Pronunciation Ability 20 points - Using impressive tones, moods, and gestures suitable for the content 20 points

5.3 Time keeping 6. Judging Criteria 80-100 points 70-79points 60 – 69points Lower than 60

5 points Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Certificate of participant

7. Judges 7.1 Qualification - 1 native speaker and 1 non-native speaker - 3 English teachers who are fluent in English communication 7.2 Roles - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 7.3 Remarks - Judges from the same school as the contestants shall not judge them. - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service areas 8. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors - Take care of contestants in preparing room as well as lead them to competition rooms 8.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform and enforce rules and regulations 9.3 A time keeper - To keep time, the time starts from the introduction - Show signs Green sign: start Yellow sign: 1 minute reminder Red sign: Time-out (The contestants are allowed to carry-on up to 30 seconds after time-out.)

10. Remark 10.1. Committee should have equipment: stopwatch and 3 colors signs (green, yellow, and red) 10.2 Audience not allowed in the room.

3. English Speech Contest 1. Grade of contestant: Grade 1 – 3, 4 - 6, 7 – 9 and 10 -12 2. Category and numbers: Individual; 1 contestant for each grade/school 3. Time and regulation 3.1 Topic and time Grade Grade 1 – 3 Grade 4 – 6 Grade 7 – 9

Grade 10 – 12

Time Topic 2 - 3 minutes (± 30 seconds) 1. My dream 2. Home sweet Home 3. My Idol 3 - 4 minutes (± 30 seconds ) 1. Saving the Environment 2. Travelling around Thailand 3. How to Keep fit and firm 4 - 5 minutes(± 30 seconds ) 1. How will Thailand 4.0 change our lives? 2. What role should technology play in the classroom? 3.What are the advantages and disadvantages of Social Media? 5 - 6 minutes(± 30 seconds) 1. How can people as individuals help to stop climate change? 1. 2.How will Thailand 4.0 affect our future career choices? 3.If you could make a new law in Thailand. What would it be? And why?

3.2 One point will be deducted for contestant who give a speech more or less than the allocated time; 1 point per minute. Student introduction time will not be counted.

3.3 Contestants of Grade 7 – 9 and 10 – 12 will be able to draw 2 topic tickets and select either one. 3.4 No device, no document, no note are allowed while speaking 4. Judging Criteria 4.1 Content 35 - Accuracy and consistency 15 - Correct form and organizing of speech 10 - Creativity 10 4.2 Language Competence and Fluency 45 - Using correct vocabulary, structure and connectors suitable their level15 - Pronunciation, stress, intonation, rhythm, pausing, and pace 20 - Using impressive and powerful tones suitable for the content 10 4.3 Presentation 15 - Communication 10 - Personality 5 4.4 Time keeping 5 5. Judging Criteria 80 – 100 points 70 – 79 points 60 – 69 points Lower than 60points

points points points points points points points points points points points points

Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Certificate of participation

6. The judge’s decision is final. 7. Judges 7.1 Qualification - 1 native speaker and 1 non-native speaker - 3 English teachers who are fluent in English communication 7.2 Roles - Fair judgment - Ask 1 question that related to the speaking topic to the contestant when finished. It should be the native speaker judge who asks the contestant. - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department

7.3 Remarks - Judges from the same school as the contestants shall not judge them. - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service areas 8. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors - Take care of contestants in preparing room as well as lead them to competition rooms 8.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform the rules and regulations 8.3 Time keeper 1 person - To keep time, the time starts from the introduction - Show signs Green sign: start Yellow sign: 1 minute reminder Red sign: Time-out (the contestants are allowed to carry-on up to 30 seconds) Remark: Should have equipment: stopwatch and 3 colors sign (green, yellow, and red) 8.4 Students’ supervisor 1 – 2 people - Prepare A4 paper, a pencil, and an eraser for drafting - Write down the topic in the 2 registration forms for the host and judges before sending the contestants in the competition. Remark Due to the pressure and stress, the supervisor should have psychological skill to help contestants cope with the pressured environment. 9.Venue Criteria: 9.1 Registration desk 9.2 Competition Rooms 9.2.1 Waiting Room Right after the contestant finish registration, all the contestants draw the ordinal number and wait in this room. 9.2.2 Preparing Room After the draw, each contestant will be allowed to enter the preparing room 7 minutes before the speaking time start. The contestant prepares the speech within 5 minutes

(under the timer). In this matter, there will be a need for a supervisor to calm the contestant under the pressure. 9.2.3 Competition Room: Each contestant will be allowed in order. The equipments provided in the room are as follow: - Contestant Stage - Judges table - Timekeeper table - Audience chairs Remark: 1. The venue is allowed for audience; however, taking photograph, video, recording or holding a sign are prohibited. The contestant keeps calm; therefore, any disturbance from the audience as talking on the phone, ringing or any alert are not allowed. 2. Once the speech starts, no one is allowed to enter the room. 3. The waiting room and the preparing room should be a quiet room.

4. Singing Contest 2017 1. Grade of contestant: Grade 1 – 3, 4 - 6, 7 – 9 and 10 -12 2. Category and numbers: Individual; 1 contestant for each grade/school 3. Song for the Contest: An English song 4. Equipment for the competition - Each contestant prepares his/her own CD (Audio CD) backing track. - Each contestant submits 5 copies of his/her song lyrics for the 5 judges. - Contestants to wear their school uniform 5. Judging Criteria 5.1 Singing Ability 50 points - Tone (Voice power &Sound beauty) 25points - Correct rhythm and tempo 25points 5.2 Correctness of Lines and Words 35 points 5.3 Performance Ability on Stage 15 points - Personality, Self-confidence, Facial Expressions, Eye-contact with the audience and entertaining.

6. Judging Criteria 80 – 100 points 70 – 79 points 30 – 34 points Lower than 60 points

Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Certificate of participation

7. The judges ‘decision is final. 8. Judges 8.1 Qualification - 2 Native or Non-Native speakers - 3 Thai musical teacher who has ability in singing English songs and English communication skills 8.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 8.3 Remarks - Judges from the same school as the contestants shall not judge them. - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service areas 9. Committee 9.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors - Take care of contestants in preparing room as well as lead them to competition rooms 9.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform the rules and regulations 10. Venue Criteria: Nice and quiet

5. Spelling Bee Competition (2017) 1. Grade of contestant: Grade 1 – 3, 4 - 6, 7 – 9 and 10 -12 2. Category and numbers: Individual; 1 contestant for each grade/school 3. Competition regulation: 3.1 There are 2 rounds of competition. Qualifying Round: Using the given word (Total Score: 100 points) - The native speaker judge pronounces the words TWICE - To give the context of the word, the judge will use the word in a sentence and will say it TWICE. The contestants write the word on the piece of paper provided. There are a total of 20 words in the first round and each word is 5 points. The contestants whose scores is 50 points or upper will be eligible to go to the final round. Final Round: using curriculum from ministry of education B.E.2551 as following: Grade 1 – 3, 4 – 6 and 7 – 9 1) Finalist will be automatically scored 50 points individually. 2) Finalist will draw for the ordinal number. 3) The contestant will start the competition one after the other in order. The rest of contestants will wait for their turn in another room. The contestant will get a set of 5 words / 10 points each/ Total 50 points (Each word and definition is informed once. 4) Word Spelling (Timer get started after the judge inform the word and definition within 10 seconds.) If the word is spelt correctly, the judge will say “Correct” and a speller gets 10 points. If the word is spelt wrongly or not spell in the allocated time, the judge will say “ Sorry” and follow with the next word until 5 quotas are finished. 5) The spellers wait in the competition room until the competition is finished. 6) The next speller spells the same set of 5 vocabs as the first speller until the game finishes. Grade 10 – 12 1) Finalist will be automatically scored 50 points individually. 2) Finalist will draw for the ordinal number. 3) The contestant will start the competition one after the other in order. The rest of contestants will wait for their turn in another room. The contestant will get a set of 5 words / 10 points each/ Total 50 points (Each word and definition is informed once. 4) Word Spelling (Timer get started after the judge inform the word and definition within 10 seconds.) The contestant only can have 2 questions before spelling words. - What part of speech is it? - Can I have a sentence please?

If the word is spelt correctly, the judge will say “Correct” and a speller gets 10 points. If the word is spelt wrongly or not spell in the allocated time, the judge will say “ Sorry” and follow with the next word until 5 quotas are finished. 5) The spellers wait in the competition room until the competition is finished. 6) The next speller spells the same set of 5 vocabs as the first speller until the game finishes. 3.2 Vocabulary range Qualifying Round(As specify) Grade 1-3 Vocabulary for grade 1- 2 Grade 4 - 6 Vocabulary for grade 3-4 Grade 7 – 9 Vocabulary for grade 5-6 Grade 10 – 12 Vocabulary for grade 7-8 Final Round Using curriculum from ministry of education B.E.2551 4. Judging Criteria (Total Score: 100) Checking the correct vocabulary spelling 80 – 100 points Gold Medal 70 – 79 points Silver Medal 60 – 79 points Bronze Medal Lower than 60 points Certificate of participation 5. The judges ‘decision is final. 6. Judges 6.1 Qualification - 1 Native and 1 Non-Native speaker - 3 English teachers who are fluent in English spelling and communication 6.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 6.3 Remarks - Judges from the same school as the contestants shall not judge them. - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service areas

7. Committee 7.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors - Take care of contestants in preparing room as well as lead them to competition rooms 7.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform the rules and regulations 7.3 Student caretaker 2-3 people - Preparing papers and pens for the competition round 1 - Set the location for the competition round 2 - Send each competitor to spell in order during the final round - Help judges to collect score for final round 8. Venue Criteria: Nice and quiet Remark: The points earned in the qualifying round will NOT be added in the final round.

6. Crossword 1.Grade of contestant: Grades 1-6, Grades 7 – 9 and 10 - 12 *Grades 1-6 using the crossword board for Primary (11*11) squares and others using the normal crossword board (15*15) squares 2. Rules and regulations 2.1 Competitions 2.1.1 If there are less than 6 teams, it is recommended to use the Round Robin system. For example, a maximum of 4 teams, they would meet up for 3 rounds until we find the finalist. If there are 5 teams, each round will have the bye winning team. There will be no final round as the judges’ decision is final. 2.1.2 If there are more than 7 teams, the Swiss paring method will be usedfor qualifying teams with the same score. There will be 4 games as following: 1st game 1 09.00 - 09.35 a.m. 2nd game 2 09.50 - 10.25 a.m. 3rd game 3 10.40 - 11.15 a.m. 4th game 4 12.00 - 12.35 p.m.

The final game will use the King of the Hill method of sorting the scores. The team with the highest score meets the 2ndhighest one for being the winner, the third highest meets the fourth highest for being the 2nd runner up and the final round starting at 01.00 p.m. 2.2. Rules and regulations: Based on the standard by Thailand Crossword Game A-Math Kumkom and Sudoku Association (TCA). 2.2.1 In each game the winning team will get a maximum of 2 points, in case of a draw both teams will get1 point each, and losers will get no point. 2.2.2 Final computing: scoring to be decided by the judges. Teams with equal scores will be judged on maximum difference. 2.2.3 Maximum Difference - Grade 1 – 6 teams should not have more than 100 points in the qualifying round and not more than 80 points on the final round - Grade 7 – 12 teams should not have more than 250 points in qualify round and not more than 200 points on the final round. -The final round has no maximum difference. 2.2.4 Bye winning for Grade 1-6 teams gets 50 points and for Grade 7 – 12 teams gets 100 points. 2.3 Timing - Qualifying round: 35 minutes per game using the Chess Clock or the Switch Toggle. If a clock is not available, the committee have to verbally inform 5 minutes before time up. Each team will be allowed to finish their games for another 2 more turns. - Final Game and Semi-Final Round are 44 minutes per game. If using the switch toggle or chess clock 22 minutes per team and stop the time when challenge. (Chess clock available on App store to download) 3. Judging Criteria 80-100 points Gold medal 70-79 points Silver medal 60-69 points Bronze medal Lower than 60 points Certificate of participation Remark(Calculate from the number of total team for example, - 6 teams:  gold The winner and the 1st runner up  silver The 2nd runner up and the 4thplace  Bronze The 5th and 6th - 15 teams:

   

gold The winner, the 1st runner up and the 2ndrunner up silver The 4th and 5th get bronze The 6th and 7th Certificate of participation The others

4. Judges 4.1 Qualification - 1 Native or Non-Native speaker - 4 Thai Teachers who understand crossword rule and regulation are fluent in English 4.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 4.3 Remarks - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service area offices 5. Committee 5.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors 5.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform the rules and regulations 6. Venue Criteria: Nice and quiet

7. A-Math 1.Grade of contestant: *Grades 1 – 6 and Grades 7 – 9: 2 competitors per team Grade 10 – 12: Individual but each school can send 2. *Grades 1-6 use the A-Math for Primary (70 tiles),Grade 7– 12 use standard A-math (100 tiles) 2. Rules and regulations 2.1 Competitions 2.1.1 If there are less than 6 teams, it is recommended to use the Round Robin system. For example, a maximum of 4 teams, they would meet up for 3 rounds until we find the finalist. If there are 5 teams, each round will have the bye winning team. There will be no final round as the judges’ decision is final. 2.1.2 If there are more than 7 teams, the Swiss paring method will be used for qualifying teams with the same score. There will be 4 games as following: 1st game 1 09.00 - 09.35 a.m. 2nd game 2 09.50 - 10.25 a.m. 3rd game 3 10.40 - 11.15 a.m. 4th game 4 12.00 - 12.35 p.m. The final game will use the King of the Hill method by of sorting the scores. The team with the highest score meets the 2ndhighest one for being the winner, the third highest meets the fourth highest for being the 2nd runner up and the final round starting at 01.00 p.m. 2.2. Rules and regulations: Based on the standard by Thailand Crossword Game A-Math Kumkom and Sudoku Association (TCA). 2.2.1 In each game the winning team will get the maximum of 2 points, in case of a draw both teams will get 1 point each, and losers will get no point. 2.2.2 Final computing: scoring to be decided by the judges. Teams with equal scores will be judged on maximum difference. 2.2.3 Maximum Difference - Grade 1 – 6 teams should not have more than 150 points in the qualify round and not more than 120 points on the final round - Grade 7 – 12 teams should not have more than 250 points in the preliminary round and not more than 200 points on the final round. -The final round has no maximum difference. 2.2.4 Bye winning for every teamgets100 points.

2.3 Timing - Qualifier round: 35 minutes per game using Chess Clock or Switch Toggle. If no available clock, the committee have to verbally inform 5 minutes before times up. Each team will be allowed to finish their games for another 2 more turns. - Final Game and Semi-Final Round are 44 minutes per game if using the switch toggle or chess clock 22 minutes per team and stop the time when challenge. (Chess clock available on App store to download) 3. Judging Criteria 80-100 points Gold medal 70-79 points Silver medal 60-69 points Bronze medal Lower than 60 points Certificate of participation Remark(Calculate from the number of total team for example, - 6 teams:  gold The winner and the 1st runner up  silver The 2nd runner up and the 4thplace  Bronze The 5th and 6th - 15 teams:  gold The winner, the 1st runner up and the 2ndrunner up  silver The 4th and 5th get  bronze The 6th and 7th  Certificate of participation The others 4. Judges 4.1 Qualification - 1 native or non - native speaker - 4 Thai teachers who are an expert in crossword rule/regulation and fluent in English 4.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 4.3 Remarks - Judges will be appointed as per their teaching level

- Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service area offices 5. Committee 5.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors 5.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - To inform the rules and regulations 6. Venue Criteria: Nice and quiet

8. Sudoku 1. Grade of contestant: Only individual contestants, with a maximum 2 competitors from each school (Grade 1 – 6 will use 8*8 grid and Grade 7 – 12 will use 9*9 grid) 2. Rules and regulations 2.1 Competition process 2.1.1 Qualifying Round All contestants to solve the same puzzle, each puzzle has different point allocated to it. Full points will be given to correctly completed puzzle in allocated time and a time bonus for puzzles completed before allocated time. There will be no points for incorrect value. 2.1.2 Final Round The top five of the qualifying competitors will do the final round. 2.2 Scoring 2.2.1 Puzzle Score: If the competitors can solve the puzzle in the allocated time, each competitor will be awarded. 2.2.2 Time Bonus is an extra point for correctly completed before the allocated time. The time bonus is computed by taking the remaining time multiplied by 3 points (the decimal will be eliminated). For example, the solving time is set at 30 minutes so if the competitor completes the puzzle in 20.40 minutes, judge will score a time bonus of 9 x 3 = 27 (9 is the remaining minutes).

However, if the competitors cannot solve within the allocated time, they will get no points and no bonus. 3. Judging Criteria 80 – 100 points Gold Medal 70 – 79 points Silver Medal 60 – 69 points Bronze Medal Less than 60 points Certificate of Participation Remark(Calculate from the number of total competitors for example, - 6 competitors:  gold The winner and the 1st runner up  silver The 2nd runner up and the 4thplace  Bronze The 5th and 6th - 15 competitors:  gold The winner, the 1st runner up and the 2ndrunner up  silver The 4th and 5th get  bronze The 6th and 7th  Certificate of participation The others 4. Judges 4.1 Qualification - 1 Native or non-native teacher - 4 Thai teacher who are Sudoku expert and fluently in English. 4.2 Roles - Judge according to the fairest game rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 4.3 Remark - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service area offices. 5. Committee 5.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors 5.2 Moderator (s) 1-2 people

- to inform the rules and regulations 6.Venue Criteria: nice and quiet

9. Mathematics Project Work 1. Grade of contestant: Grades 1 - 6, Grades 7 – 9 and Grades10 - 12 2. Types of Competition: Team of 3 students, 1 Team/ Grade/School. It must be Mathematics Project Work displayed in English with printed reports in English 5 copies of the report to be handed to the judges. Each team also needs to prepare a board as follow: 60 cm. 

120 cm.-

60 cm.-

Each team presents their project in English. They can use board and other prepared materials while presenting, Internet connection is not allowed. 3. Time for Competition: Key Stage Grades 1 - 6 Grades 7 – 9 Grades10 - 12

Time 5-7 minutes (±30 seconds) 7-10 minutes (±30 seconds) 7-10 minutes (±30 seconds)

Remark Judges will ask each team 3-5 questions regarding the projects. (The questioning will not be counted in the time limit)

4. Judging Criteria (Total Score: 100 points) 4.1. Project -Understanding of Project Topic -Using project’s principles -Creative Ability and Originality (Idea & Design) -Adequate Evidence of Data Recorded

40 points 10 points 10 points 10 points 10 points

4.2 Report 15 points -Accuracy of Scientific Study 3 points - Clearly Labeled and Structured Results (picture, tables, graphs) 4 points - Communication Skills (English Languages Use and Technical Terms) 5 points -Discussion and conclusion in a clear and precise manner 3 points

4.3 Project Display (Be Well-prepared for school name signboard) 15 points - Using suitable materials and equipment 4 points - Clarity and layout in illustrating the techniques involved in the project 4 points - Beauty, neatness and endurance 2 points - Creativity (New idea of Design and Presentation ) 5 points 4.4 Oral Discussion30 points -Demonstration of knowledge 15 points - Ability to answer questions 15 points 5. Judging Criteria Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Less than 60 points

80-100 points 70-79 points 60-69 points Certificate of Participation

6. The judges’ decision is final. 7. Judges 7.1 Qualification - One native or non-native English speaker - Four Thai Mathematics teachers who are experts in Mathematics and fluent in English. 7.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 7.3 Remark - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent a variety of education service area offices 8. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors 8.2 Moderator (s) 1-2 people - to inform the rules and regulations

10. Science Project Work 1. Grade of contestant: Grades 1 - 6, Grades 7 – 9 and Grades10 - 12 2. Types of Competition: Team of 3 students, 1 Team/ Grade/School. It must be Mathematics Project Work displayed in English with printed reports in English 5 copies to hand the judges. Each team also needs to prepare a board as follow: 60 cm. 

120 cm.-

60 cm.-

Each team presents their project in English. They can use board and other prepared materials while presenting, but don’t connect to the internet. 3. Time for Competition: Key Stage Time Grade 1 - 6 5-7 minutes (±30 seconds) Grade 7 - 9 7-10 minutes (±30 seconds) Grade 10 - 12 7-10 minutes (±30 seconds)

Remark Judges will ask each team 3-5 questions regarding the projects. (The questioning will not be counted in the time limit)

4. Judging Criteria (Total Score: 100 points) 4.1. Project 40 points -Understanding of Project Topic 10 points -Using project’s principles 10 points -Creative Ability and Originality (Idea & Design) 10 points -Adequate Evidence of Data Recorded 10 points 4.2 Report 15 points -Accuracy of Scientific Study 3 points - Clearly Labeled and Structured Results (picture, tables, graphs) 4 points -Communication Skills( English Languages Use and Technical Terms) 5 points -Discussion and conclusion in a clear and precise manner 3 points 4.3 Project Display ( Be Well-prepared for school name signboard) 15 points - Using suitable materials and equipment 4 points - Clarity and layout in illustrating the techniques involved in the project 4 points - Beauty, neatness and endurance 2 points - Creativity (New idea of Design and Presentation) 5 points

4.4 Oral Discussion30 points -Demonstration of knowledge - Ability to answer questions 5. Judging Criteria Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Less than 60 points

15 points 15 points

80-100 points 70-79 points 60-69 points Certificate of Participation

6. The judges’ decision is final. 7. Judges 7.1 Qualifications - One native or non-native English speaker - Four Thai Science teachers who expert in science and fluently in English. 7.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest game rules of the game - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 7.3 Remark - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent variety education service area offices 8. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors 8.2 Moderator (s) 1-2 people - to inform the rules and regulations

11. Computer Project Work (Software) 1. Grade of contestant: Grades 1 - 6, Grades 7 – 9 and Grades10 - 12 2. Types of Competition: Team of 3 students, 1 Team/ Grade/School. 3. Process and Criteria 3.1 A project conducted last year or in the current year. 3.2 The objective to develop project is to develop Teaching Aids or for solutions by using any computer languages. 3.3 Five copies of the printed report are to be submitted to the judges on the day of competition. 3.4 Project Board displayed in English in the following standard size: 60 cm 120 cm 60 cm

Decoration for beauty or non-related materials will not affect any scores and judgment. 3.5 The project is to be presented in English. Accessories related to the project are allowed but an internet connection is NOT. 3.6 Judges will ask each team questions regarding the projects.. 4. Time for Competition: Grade Grades 1 - 6 Grades 7 - 9 Grades 10 - 12

Time 4-5 minutes (±30 seconds) 5-7 minutes (±30 seconds) 7-10 minutes (±30 seconds)

5. Judging Criteria (Total Score: 100 points) 5.1. Document and Presentation -Document Accuracy and Completeness - Presentation Accuracy and Completeness -Presentation Medias Accuracy 5.2 Utilization and Importance -Additional Documents Search - Project Development -Body of Knowledge Integration and Application

15 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 25 points 5 points 5 points 5 points

-Benefit for students, school and education - Practical application in daily life

5 points 5 points

5.3 Project Making Process and Steps -Interesting Topic -Study Process -Project Suggestion - Project Development Process - Completely presented and publicized report

20 points 4 points 4 points 4 points 4 points 4 points

5.4 Creativity -Practicality - Showing Initiative, interesting and various -Productivity and Benefit for developer, society and culture - Level of creativity

20 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 5 points

5.5 Presentation - Accuracy and Content Completeness - Understandability and Good Gesture - Timeous Completion - Accuracy and Clearness in Answering questions

10 points 3 points 3 points 2 points 2 points

5.6 Submission -Punctual Report Submission

10 points 10 points

6. Judging Criteria 80 -100 points 70-79 points 60-69 points Less than 60 points

Gold Medal Silver Medal Bronze Medal Certificate of Participation

7. The judges’ decision is final. 8. Judges: 8.1 Qualification - One native and one non-native English speaker or two non-native English speakers - Three Thai Computer teachers who are experts in computers and fluent in English.

8.2 Role - Judge according to the fairest rules of the game - Summarize all scores /documents and hand them to evaluation department 8.3 Remark - Judges should be from their teaching level and represent variety education service area offices. 9. Committee 9.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Verifying details of competitors 9.2 Moderator (s) 1-2 people - To inform and enforce rules and regulations 9.3 The computer technician - To solve any occurring problems

Teacher competition 1. Teaching Innovative Technique Competition 1. Contestant Qualifications: Teachers or Co-Teachers who teach in EP/ MEP in Grade 1 – 6 and Grade 7 - 12 2. Types: Individual, 1 each school/grade 3. Innovation Types: Teaching Innovative Technique, process or media which is used to improve or develop learners in English Program or Mini English Program to learn effectively by using English for communication. It might be the completely new or partly new innovation which was practically conducted last academic year or current academic year. The presentation and report is in English only. 4. Process and Time 5 innovation printed reports in English and hand to the judges on the competition day. Exhibition booth size : 3 X 3 Meters Presentation time : 10-12 Minutes Judges questioning time : 3-5 Minutes Project assistant is not allowed while presenting

5. Judging Criteria 5.1 Being Innovative 10 Points -Creativity 10 Points 5.2 Development Process 55 Points - Purposes and Targets to develop the innovation 10 Points - Principles, Concepts and Theory to develop the innovation10 Points 10 Points - Innovation Design 10 Points - Innovation Development Process 10 Points - Innovation Development Achievement 15 Points 5.3 Innovation Value 35 Points - Solution / Quality Development for students 10 Points - Resources Usage to develop the innovation 10 Points - Knowledge Access Promotion 5 Points - Being accredited 5 Points - Practicality 5 Points 6. Judging Criteria 80-100 points Gold Medal 70-79 points Silver Medal 60-69 points Bronze Medal Less than 60 points Certificate of Participation 7. The judges’ decision is final. 8. Judges 8.1 Qualification - Two university professionals /experts in teaching and learning methodology - One university professional /expert in teaching and learning Science - One university professional /expert in teaching and learning Mathematics - One university professional /expert in Innovations. 8.2 Roles - Fair Judgment under the judging criteria - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 8.3 Remark - The judges should come from various universities. 9. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors

8.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - to inform the rules and regulations

School competition 1. EP/MEP School Innovation 1. Contestant Qualifications: EP/ MEP school 2. Types: 1 Innovation per school 3. Innovation categories: School can choose only one innovation project from the following categories. 3.1 Learning management innovation: Techniques, Methods or Media under EP/MEP school policy for teacher using to improve students’efficiency 3.2 Innovation for learner development activities: Techniques, methods emphasizing students’ desired characteristic development created by the school or improvised. The innovation could be a whole new concept, a part of a finished project from last year or semester or this semester which has been successfully proven and developed in the past. English Printed Report and English presentation is needed. (This innovation concept must have never been in a competition or received any awards before). 4. Process and Time 5 innovation printed reports in English and hand to the judges on the competition day. Exhibition booth size : 3 X 3 Meters Presentation time : 10-12 Minutes Judges questioning time : 3-5 Minutes Project assistant is allowed while presenting 5. Judging Criteria 5.1 Being Innovative 10 Points -Creativity 10 Points 5.2 Development Process 55 Points - Purposes and Targets to develop the innovation 10 Points - Principles, Concepts and Theory to develop the innovation 10 Points - Design 10 Points - Development Process 10 Points - Development Achievement 15 Points 5.3 Innovation Value 35 Points - Solution / Quality Development for students 10 Points

- Resources Usage to develop the innovation - Knowledge Access Promotion - Being accepted - Practicality

10 Points 5 Points 5 Points 5 Points

6. Judging Criteria 80-100 points Gold Medal 70-79 points Silver Medal 60-69 points Bronze Medal Less than 60 points Certificate of Participation 7. The judges’ decision is final. 8. Judges 8.1 Qualification - 1 university professionals who experts in teaching and learning methodology and is fluent in English - 1university professional who expert in emphasizing students’ desired characteristic - 1 university professional who expert in developing innovations 8.2 Roles - Fair Judgment under the judging criteria 8.2 Roles - Fair Judgment under the judging criteria - Summarize all scores/documents and hand them to evaluation department 8.3 Remark - The judges should come from various universities. 9. Committee 8.1 Registrar(s) 1-2 people - Registration - Checking the name of competitors 8.2 Moderator (s)1-2 people - to inform the rules and regulations

Multi-skill competition 1. Qualification of competitors a. Current students in grade 4-6 b. Current students in grade 7-9 c. Current students in grade 10-12 2. Category a. Single b. grade 4-6 one competitor grade 7-9 one competitor grade 10-12 one competitor 3. Procedure and criteria of competition Tests in English proficiency in -speaking-listening-writing-reading-picture dictation 4. Distribution of scores a. English proficiency paper test in listening, reading and writing for 70 minutes for 60 points in the following Listening 20 questions 20 minutes Reading 20 questions 20 minutes Writing, 20 questions 30 minutes: grade 4-6 not less than 100 words, grade 7-9 not less than 150 words and grade 10-12 not less than 200 words b. Speaking test by interviewing (20 points); judges are: one native speaker and two Thais in the following criteria

-use of language-Problems solving-creativity c. Draw a picture from listening to a native speaker( he/she will read the story 2 times) 20 points, the competitor can take notes while listening and the competitor has 30 minutes to draw a picture from listening to the story, criteria for picture evaluation: -correct according to the story listened-amount of details in the picture 5. Awards for winner 80% or more Gold 70% or more Silver 60% or more Bronze Less than 60% receive a certificate, the decision of the judges is final

6. Judges and competition monitors 3 judges and 3 competition monitors for each level of competition The 3 judges are as follows; 1 native speaker, 1 English teacher, 1 English language specialist Notes: Judge from the same school is not eligible. Judges must be from the same level of teaching of the competitors Judges should be comprised of personnel from different education zones. Judges should give advice to the winner of the first, second and third places. Test venues: The reading skill, listening skill, writing skill, and picture dictation skill must be conducted in a sound proof room and the interview must be done in 3 different rooms, one for each level and a green room must be provided for.

7. National level competition a. The winners of the first, second and third places are eligible to enter the national level competition b. In case the first 3 places have the same score, judges will use the score from the first point of the criteria to decide, if they score the same score on the first point of the criteria, the judges will use the second point of criteria to decide etc. If the competitors have equal points in all points of criteria, the head of judges will make the final decision หมายเหตุ : การเขียนเรียงความ กาหนดหัวข้อตามหลักสูตรที่ระบุไว้ใน การแข่งขัน Impromptu Speech