2015-16 Report Card Rating Details Report Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School The purpose of the Report Card rating details report is to describe the rating methodology and display the data used by the school accountability system to determine the overall school rating (i.e., overall level) that is shown on each school’s Report Card. For more details on the school report cards, please visit the following link: http://www.ode.state.or.us/go/schoolRC.

Given the recent passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and the expiration of Oregon's ESEA flexibility waiver on August 1, 2016, the State of Oregon will not assign overall school ratings for the 2015-16 school year.

Overall Level: Not Rated Performance Indicator

Academic Achievement (page 3)

Academic Growth (page 4)

Student Group Growth (page 5)

Level

% of Points Weight Earned

Weighted Points

Level 1

20.0%

NA

NA

Level 3

60.0%

NA

NA

Level 4

70.0%

NA

NA

0

NA

NA

NA

Consecutive Years with Missed Participation Targets* (page 6)

* Schools do not receive points for participation. However, a school's overall Level is lowered by one level for each consecutive year that it did not meet all participation targets.

Totals**

Weighted Percent

** Schools may not be eligible for all possible points. Schools are not rated in categories where they do not meet minimum student count requirements.

Federal Reporting Designations Received Title I Funds in 2015-16 (Y/N) ESEA Designation (if any)

Y

Inst ID = 645 Page: 1 of 6

NA

Level Assignment

Weighted Percent

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable

Levels are calculated using the percentage of points earned out of the total points eligible. For schools with data on all indicators, the total points possible are: •25 for Academic Achievement •50 for Academic Growth •25 for Student Group Growth The total score is matched to the scoring guide above to determine the school’s rating.

2015-16 Report Card Rating Details Report Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School The school accountability system determines the overall school rating by using the percent of points a school earns for each of the indicators below. Subsequent pages display the data that support each indicator rating. Academic Achievement (page 3)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

English Language Arts (All Students) Level 1 1 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 1 1 5 Total Level 1 2 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 20.0%

Academic Growth (page 4)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

English Language Arts (All Students) Level 3 3 5 Mathematics (All Students) Level 3 3 5 Total Level 3 6 10 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 60.0%

Student Group Growth (page 5)

Level

Points Earned Points Eligible

English Language Arts Economically Disadvantaged Level 3 3 5 English Learners Level 3 3 5 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 4 4 5 Math Economically Disadvantaged Level 3 3 5 English Learners Level 4 4 5 Students with Disabilities Not Rated 0 0 1 Underserved Races/Ethnicities Level 4 4 5 Total Level 4 21 30 Percent of Points Earned = Total Points Earned / Total Points Eligible 70.0% 1.

Includes American Indian/Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic students.

Inst ID = 645 Page: 2 of 6

Category Level Cutoffs Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

% of Points Earned 90.0% 70.0% 50.0% 30.0% <30.0%

2015-16 Academic Achievement Details Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School Achievement Level Cutoffs The Academic Achievement indicator reflects the percent of all students that meet or exceed standards on the state English language arts and mathematics assessments at all tested grades in the school. Both English language arts and mathematics have an annual measurable target, and each student group will meet the target if the value for "% of students at Level 3 or Level 4" is greater than or equal to the target.

Level

English Language Arts

Math

Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

74.6 & above 54.5 to 74.5 37.1 to 54.4 28.2 to 37.0 Less than 28.2

66.1 & above 40.0 to 66.0 27.4 to 39.9 20.0 to 27.3 Less than 20.0

English Language Arts Target: 54.5% 2014-15

2015-16

Tests

% Level 3/4

Tests

% Level 3/4

Combined % Met

Level 1

198

23.2

198

31.8

27.5

Level 1

162

15.4

163

22.7

19.1

Level 1

77

9.1

92

15.2

12.4

Level 1

26

11.5

20

5.0

8.7

Level 1

113

18.6

135

27.4

23.4

American Indian/Alaska Native2

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander2

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

English Language Arts All Students Economically

Disadvantaged1

English Learners1 Students with

Disabilities1

Underserved Races/Ethnicities1

Black/African

American2

Hispanic/Latino2

Level

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 1

112

18.8

133

27.1

23.3

Asian1

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

White1

Level 2

74

31.1

60

40.0

35.1

Not Rated

11

18.2

*

*

28.6

Multi-Racial1

Mathematics Target: 40.0%

Math

Level

2014-15

2015-16

Tests

% Level 3/4

Tests

% Level 3/4

Combined % Met

All Students

Level 1

196

15.8

198

21.2

18.5

Economically Disadvantaged1

Level 1

160

8.8

163

14.7

11.8

Learners1

Level 1

*

<5

92

8.7

6.5

Students with Disabilities1

Level 1

26

11.5

20

5.0

8.7

English

Underserved

Races/Ethnicities1

American Indian/Alaska Native2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander2

Black/African American2 Hispanic/Latino2 Asian1 White1 Multi-Racial1

Level 1

112

14.3

135

17.8

16.2

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 1

111

14.4

133

17.3

16.0

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 2

74

20.3

60

30.0

24.6

Not Rated

*

<5

*

*

<5

1.

These data are not part of the Academic Achievement indicator but are included to provide additional information on student group performance. 2. Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities student group. Data notes: * Fewer than 6 students tested. >95.0 Greater than 95 percent of students met or exceeded. Test counts are also suppressed. <5.0 Less than 5 percent of students met or exceeded. Test counts are also suppressed.

Inst ID = 645 Page: 3 of 6

2015-16 Academic Growth Details Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School

Growth Level Cutoffs

The Academic Growth indicator uses the Colorado Growth Model to measure student growth in English language arts and mathematics as compared to academic peers (i.e., students throughout the state who have a similar English language arts or mathematics test score history).

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Median Growth Percentile 65 & above 50 to 64.5 40 to 49.5 35 to 39.5 Less than 35

Oregon adopted this growth model as part of the process of obtaining a waiver from some of the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This growth model provides a more complete picture of student performance and will help provide a better evaluation of school effectiveness. The growth model examines a student’s current performance as compared to that of his/her academic peers with a similar test score history, and expresses it as a percentile (i.e., a ranking from 1 to 99 where 99 is the highest). For example, a growth percentile of 50 in English language arts would indicate that a student had typical or average growth compared to all other students in the state with similar prior test scores. A growth percentile of 80 would indicate that a student’s growth was as high or higher than 80 percent of his/her academic peers. The school accountability system uses the median growth percentile for both English language arts and mathematics to represent the “typical” growth at the school. For example, a median growth percentile of 65 in mathematics would indicate that the typical student in this school exhibited growth in mathematics as high or higher than 65 percent of his/her academic peers. As shown below, this median growth percentile is the basis for the Academic Growth ratings for English language arts and mathematics. 2014-15

Academic Growth

Level

2015-16

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

English Language Arts (All Students)

Level 3

120

26.0

119

60.0

44.0

Mathematics (All Students)

Level 3

119

45.0

118

52.5

49.0

Data notes: Not Rated Refers to a student group that did not meet minimum size requirements in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students with growth percentiles. NA Is not applicable

Inst ID = 645 Page: 4 of 6

2015-16 Student Group Growth Details Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School Growth Level Cutoffs

The Student Group Growth indicator measures the growth of historically underserved student groups. It disaggregates the Academic Growth indicator and reflects the growth for economically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities, and historically underserved races/ethnicities. The school accountability system uses the median growth percentile for both English language arts and mathematics to represent the “typical” growth for each student group.

Level Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Median Growth Percentile 65 & above 50 to 64.5 40 to 49.5 35 to 39.5 Less than 35

To receive a Student Group Growth indicator rating, a student group must meet the minimum size requirement for the Academic Achievement indicator rating (i.e., 40 tests in the last two years combined) and at least 30 students with growth percentiles. 2014-15

English Language Arts Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific

Islander1

Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1 Asian2 White2 Multi-Racial2

Level

2015-16

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Level 3

98

32.0

97

57.0

44.0

Level 3

50

33.0

48

58.5

43.5

Not Rated

16

12.0

13

68.0

33.0

Level 4

72

33.0

74

65.5

51.5

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 4

72

33.0

73

65.0

51.0

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 2

40

26.0

43

48.0

35.0

Not Rated

8

14.5

*

*

20.5

2014-15

Math

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Students

Level

2015-16

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Students

Median Growth Percentile

Combined Median Growth Percentile

Economically Disadvantaged

Level 3

97

43.0

96

51.5

46.0

English Learners

Level 4

49

45.0

48

59.5

51.0

Not Rated

16

37.0

12

28.5

29.5

Level 4

71

46.0

74

54.5

50.0

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska

Native1

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African

American1

Hispanic/Latino1

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

Level 4

71

46.0

73

55.0

50.0

Asian2

Not Rated

*

*

*

*

*

White2

Level 3

40

33.0

42

51.5

42.5

Not Rated

8

14.5

*

*

26.0

Multi-Racial2 1. 2.

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities student group. These data are not part of the Student Group Growth indicator but are included to provide additional information on student group performance.

Data notes: Not Rated Refers to a student group that did not meet minimum size requirements in order to receive a rating. * Fewer than 6 students with growth percentiles. NA Is not applicable

Inst ID = 645 Page: 5 of 6

2015-16 Participation Details Public Version - October 13, 2016

District: Greater Albany Public SD 8J School: South Shore Elementary School All students in tested grades and enrolled on the first school day in May must take a statewide assessment. The tables below display the percentage of students who took a statewide assessment by school year, subject, and student group. The tables also indicate whether each student group met the federal participation rate target of 94.5%. The Academic Achievement, Academic Growth, and Student Group Growth indicators depend upon student test scores. These indicators are valid only when schools uniformly test all students. Note that non-participants include the following: students whose parents/guardians opted them out from taking the statewide English language arts or mathematics assessments, students who were absent for an extended period of time, students whose parents/guardians requested they not participate for religious or disability related reasons, or students who did not participate due to unknown circumstances.

Participation Target: 94.5% English Language Arts

Status

All Students Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1 Asian White Multi-Racial

Met Met Met Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Not Rated Met Not Rated

Math

Status

All Students Economically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities Underserved Races/Ethnicities American Indian/Alaska Native1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander1 Black/African American1 Hispanic/Latino1 Asian White Multi-Racial

Met Met Met Met Met Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated Met Not Rated Met Not Rated

1. 2.

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

Combined

Applied Rate2

207 167 80 26 119 0 1 0 118 0 77 11

205 165 93 20 139 0 1 1 137 0 63 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -100.0 -100.0 -100.0 100.0

98.6 99.4 97.9 95.2 97.9 -100.0 100.0 97.9 -100.0 100.0

99.3 99.7 98.9 97.9 98.9 -100.0 100.0 98.8 -100.0 100.0

Combined Combined Combined Combined Combined NA NA NA Combined NA Current NA

Participants

Non-Participants

Participation Rate

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

Combined

Applied Rate2

205 165 79 26 118 0 1 0 117 0 77 10

206 165 94 20 140 0 1 1 138 0 63 3

2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

2 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

99.0 98.8 98.8 100.0 99.2 -100.0 -99.2 -100.0 90.9

99.0 99.4 98.9 95.2 98.6 -100.0 100.0 98.6 -100.0 100.0

99.0 99.1 98.9 97.9 98.9 -100.0 100.0 98.8 -100.0 92.9

Current Current Current Combined Combined NA NA NA Combined NA Current NA

Included in the Underserved Races/Ethnicities student group. The Applied rate is the rate used to determine if the participation target is met. It is the higher of the combined rate and the most recent rate.

Data notes: Not Rated Refers to a student group that did not meet the miniumum size requirement in order to receive a rating (i.e., Met or Not Met).

Inst ID = 645 Page: 6 of 6

South Shore-Detail.pdf

For. schools with data on all indicators,. the total points possible are: • 25 for Academic Achievement. • 50 for Academic Growth. • 25 for Student Group Growth.

60KB Sizes 2 Downloads 225 Views

Recommend Documents

South-South Investment in Infrastructure
In the past, public sector investments have played a lead role in developing the ... distribution system, large-scale refineries, extraction and pipelines projects in ...

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Aug 15, 2016 - Public Listening Place: MacKay Building, First Floor, Conference Room 1, 800 Governors Drive, Pierre, South ... Call to Order and Roll Call. 2.

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Public Listening Place: MacKay Building Second Floor Conference Room 4. 800 Governors Drive, Pierre, ... 1 Call to Order and Roll Call. 2 Approval of Agenda.

State of South Dakota - South Dakota Department of Education
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA: Section 1. That § 13-6~18.l be amended to read as follows: 13-6-18. 1. If a plan ...

pdf-1231\-south-carolina-slave-narratives-south-carolina ...
... the apps below to open or edit this item. pdf-1231\-south-carolina-slave-narratives-south-carolin ... rs-project-of-the-works-progress-administratio-auth.pdf.

State of South Dakota - South Dakota Department of Education
(2) The school boards of each district which voted and approved the ... to change the boundary changes of the school district and exchange land with another ...

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Jan 7, 2016 - SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING. MacKay Building ... Career & Technical Education Standards, Information Technology.

CYP2C19 - Mid-South AALAS
6Department of Pharmacology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, INSERM UMR S 956, Pitié-Salpêtrière .... functional allele (*1) plus one increased-activity allele (*17) ... rel 0.4% vs. clopidogrel 0.1%, P = 0.002)22; (ii) the fact that.

South Park
South Park Elementary School Boundaries current as of July 2008. Outer district boundary (green line) shown is approximate, not exact. Racoon. Ln. Elk Ln. L a ria t. Rd. G re tn a. A v e. F o rs y th ia. S. C arrilion. L n. G lad io la. S t. Phe a sa

South Dakota Services
South Dakota principals have a less positive perception of CS, compared to their U.S. peers. They more frequently offer CS courses, but less likely offer programming/coding or CS extracurriculars. They are much less likely to report growth in and sup

South Dakota releases education plan - South Dakota Department of ...
May 31, 2017 - state, including students, parents, teachers, school administrators, school board members ... Governor Dennis Daugaard will review and.

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Aug 15, 2016 - be moved up on the agenda. **. Public Access to listen to meeting via telephone: Please dial 1-866-410-8397. Then enter conference code ...

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Standards Revision Timeline – Becky Nelson, DOE. 7. Southeast Technical Institute (STI) Program Expansion – Diesel. Technology - Tiffany Sanderson, DOE ...

south dakota board of education - South Dakota Department of ...
Jan 7, 2016 - Technology - Tiffany Sanderson, DOE and Jim Jacobsen, STI. 8. Technical ... Career & Technical Education Standards, Information Technology.

south shore.pdf
Page 1 of 18. Page 1 of 18. Page 2 of 18. Page 2 of 18. Page 3 of 18. Page 3 of 18. south shore.pdf. south shore.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Details.

South Carolina services
Broadening equitable student access to computer science (CS) education is critical .... In the next 3 years, will the number of opportunities to learn CS in.

Announcement - South Asian University
Ferrero Daniela, Texas State University. Prof. G.O.H. Katona, Alfred Renyi Institute of. Mathematics. Prof. Miklos Simonovits, Alfred Renyi Institute of Mathematics.

Mapa South Beach.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Mapa South ...

South Carolina Groundwater Backgrounder
As Google seeks to expand our data center in Berkeley County, South Carolina, we ... needing more power to run the servers, and more water to cool them.

south India Bank.pdf
Experience in developing native Android, iOS, Windows apps and OS experience in Linux,. Windows, UNIX/Solaris environment. Experience in working with ...