SPACE-OPEN TOPOLOGY: PART II BY FEREYDOON DERAKHSHANI KORI ZANYARI MERIWAN

We continue our study of space-open topology as in [2]. We investigate the behaviour of space-open topology with respect to connectedness, countability and the separation axioms. As usual we use X, Y for topological spaces and U, V for open subsets of topological spaces. K(X, Y ) denotes the set of constant functions from X to Y , C(X, Y ) the set of continuous functions from X to Y and Y X the set of all functions from X to Y .

1. Connectedness Definition 1.1. Let DX ⊆ X be the set of points of X which do not belong to any proper open subset of X. In other words, x ∈ DX ⇐⇒ if x is in an open subset U ⊆ X, then U = X Lemma 1.2. DX has the following properties: It is a closed subset of X, It is connected, It is compact, If ∅ = 6 DX ⊆ Y ⊆ X and Y has the trivial topology, then Y = DX , (5) If DX 6= ∅, then X is connected, (6) If X is Hausdorff and it has more than one element, then DX = ∅. (1) (2) (3) (4)

Proof. (1) In fact, DX is the intersection of all nonempty closed subsets of X and hence it is closed. (2) Obviously, the induced topology on DX is the trivial one, that is, the only open subsets of DX are DX and ∅. Therefore, it is connected. 1

2

BY FEREYDOON DERAKHSHANI KORI ZANYARI MERIWAN

(3) The only open subset of X intersecting DX is X itself, thus any open covering of DX has a finite subcover. So, it is compact. (4) If there is y ∈ Y which is not in DX , then by definition of DX , there must be a proper open subset U ⊂ X which contains y. Therefore, U ∩ Y is a proper open subset of Y . This is a contradiction because Y has the trivial topology. (5) If X is not connected, then X = U ∪ V such that U, V are nonempty open subsets and U ∩ V = ∅. Then it is easy to see that DX = ∅. (6) Let x, y ∈ X. Then, there are open subsets U, V such that x ∈ U , y ∈ V and U ∩ V = ∅. So, by definition, x, y ∈ / DX . Thus, DX = ∅. £ Though for most topological spaces DX = ∅ but this is not the case for the space-open topology on F (X, Y ). In some cases, this provides a good way to prove that F (X, Y ) is connected. Example 1.3. Suppose that X = Y and F (X, Y ) = Y X . The identity function id : X → Y is in F (X, Y ). Moreover, since id is a surjective function, it does not belong to any proper open subset of F (X, Y ). This means that id ∈ DF (X,Y ) . Therefore, by Lemma 1.2, F (X, Y ) is connected. Theorem 1.4. Suppose that K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ). If Y is connected, then F (X, Y ) is also connected. Proof. Suppose that F (X, Y ) = P ∪ Q where P, Q are nonempty open subsets of F (X, Y ) and P ∩ Q = ∅. By definition of space-open topology, there are families of open subsets {Ui }i∈I and {Vj }j∈J such that P = ∪i∈I (X, Ui )F and Q = ∪j∈J (X, Vj )F . Since P ∩ Q = ∅, for any i, j we have (X, Ui ∩ Vj )F = (X, Ui )F ∩ (X, Vj )F = ∅ and so Ui ∩ Vj = ∅ because K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ). Therefore, (∪i∈I Ui ) ∩ (∪j∈J Vj ) = ∅. On the other hand, since K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ), we have Y = (∪i∈I Ui ) ∪ (∪j∈J Vj ). This is a contradiction because Y is connected. £ Theorem 1.5. Suppose that X is connected but Y is not connected. Then, the set of continuous functions F (X, Y ) = C(X, Y ) is not connected. Proof. Since Y is not connected, there are proper open subsets U, V such that Y = U ∪ V and such that U ∩ V = ∅. Let f ∈ F (X, Y ). Since f is continuous and X is connected, f (X) is also connected.

SPACE-OPEN TOPOLOGY: PART II

3

On the other hand, f (X) = (f (X) ∩ U ) ∪ (f (X) ∩ V ) which implies that f (X) ⊆ U or f (X) ⊆ V . Thus, f ∈ (X, U )F or f ∈ (X, V )F . This implies that F (X, Y ) is not connected because (X, U ∩ V )F = (X, U )F ∩ (X, V )F = ∅. £

2. Countability and separation axioms Definition 2.1. Let y ∈ Y and let By be a set of open subsets of Y containing y. We say that By is a local base at y if for any open subset U which contains y, there is V ∈ By such that V ⊆ U . Lemma 2.2. Suppose that the constant function cy associated to y is in F (X, Y ). If By is a local base at y, then Bcy = {(X, V )F | V ∈ By } is a local base at cy in F (X, Y ). Proof. It is obvious that each member of Bcy contains cy . Now suppose that there is an open subset P of F (X, Y ) containing cy . By definition of space-open topology, there is an open subset U ⊆ Y such that cy ∈ (X, U )F ⊆ P . This implies that y ∈ U . On the other hand, since By is a local base at y, there is V ∈ By such that y ∈ V ⊆ U . Thus, cy ∈ (X, V )F ⊆ (X, U )F ⊆ P . This proves that Bcy is a local base at cy . £ Remember that Y is called first-countable if every point y ∈ Y has a countable local base By . Moreover, Y is called second-countable if it has a countable base, that is if there is a countable set B of open subsets of Y which is a local base at any point y ∈ Y . Theorem 2.3. Suppose that K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ). If F (X, Y ) is first-countable then Y is also first-countable and if F (X, Y ) is secondcountable then Y is second-countable. Proof. Suppose that F (X, Y ) is first-countable. Since Y is homeomorphic to K(X, Y ) and since first-countability is inherited by subspaces, then Y is also first-countable. The proof for second-countability is similar. £ Now we turn to separation.

4

BY FEREYDOON DERAKHSHANI KORI ZANYARI MERIWAN

Theorem 2.4. Suppose that K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ). If F (X, Y ) satisfies the separation axiom T1 (or respectively T2 or T3 ) then Y also satisfies the separation axiom T1 (or respectively T2 or T3 ). Proof. Suppose that F (X, Y ) satisfies the axiom T1 . This means that if f 6= g are two elements of F (X, Y ), then there is an open subset P of F (X, Y ) such that f ∈ / P but g ∈ P . Now let y, y 0 ∈ Y . Then, there is an open subset P ⊆ F (X, Y ) which contains the constant function cy0 but it does not contain cy . This implies that there is an open subset U of Y such that cy0 ∈ (X, U )F but cy ∈ / (X, U )F . Therefore, y 0 ∈ U but y ∈ / U . So, Y satisfies T1 . The proof for other axioms is similar. In fact, all the axioms are inherited by subspaces, thus Y naturally inherits these axioms from F (X, Y ) because K(X, Y ) ⊆ F (X, Y ) and Y is homeomorphic to K(X, Y ). £ Example 2.5. Suppose that X = Y = R the set of real numbers and F (X, Y ) = Y X . Now let f 6= g be two surjective elements of F (X, Y ). So, the only open subset of F (X, Y ) which contains f or g is F (X, Y ) itself. Therefore, F (X, Y ) does not satisfy the separation axiom T1 though Y satisfies even the separation axiom T4 . References [1] N. Bourbaki; General topology. Part 2, Elements of Mathematics, AddisonWesley, 1966. [2] F. Derakhshani; Space-open topology: part I. Article of Kori Zanyari Meriwan at www.meriwan.com [3] R. McCoy, I. Ntantu; Topological properties of spaces of continuous functions. Lecture notes in Mathematics, 1315, Springer-Verlag, 1988. [4] S-T Hu; Elements of general topology. Holden-Day, 1964.

SPACE-OPEN TOPOLOGY

We continue our study of space-open topology as in [2]. We inves- tigate the behaviour of space-open topology with respect to connect- edness, countability and the separation axioms. As usual we use X, Y for topological spaces and U, V for open subsets of topological spaces. K(X, Y ) denotes the set of constant functions ...

170KB Sizes 4 Downloads 318 Views

Recommend Documents

Femap Topology Optimization.pdf
boundary conditions from the NX Nastran finite element model are taken ... Model setup is very simple using Femap, and existing NX Nastran input data.

Topology in Biology
Topology in Biology. Ralph Heiner Buchholz ... Each letter stands for one of four cyclic (meaning circular) bases - adenine, guanine, thymine and cytosine (see ...

Femap Topology Optimization.pdf
supports the complete optimization workflow including smoothing for results. transfer back to the CAD system. A complete optimization process can be. adopted ...

Using Topology Optimization
Nov 16, 2016 - Weiyang Lin, James C. Newman III, W. Kyle Anderson. Design of Broadband Acoustic Cloak. Using Topology Optimization. IMECE2016-68135 ...

CORTICAL MAPS AS TOPOLOGY-REPRESENTING NEURAL ...
latter are particularly well suited for the processing of high-dimensional "spatial" variables and solving complex problems of motor control that involve sensorimotor information. In particular, we apply the methods to the case of speech motor contro

types of network topology pdf
Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. types of network topology pdf. types of network topology pdf. Open. Extract.

Topology on Spectrum of Modules.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Topology on ...

CORTICAL MAPS AS TOPOLOGY-REPRESENTING ...
actually be used to build topological internal representations and propose that the latter are particularly well suited for the processing of high-dimensional ...

Mesh Topology Construction for Interconnected ... - IEEE Xplore
Electrical Engineering Department. University of California, Los ... Abstract—A wireless mesh network extends wireless local area network systems, which ... formed recently to recommend an extended service set (ESS) that enables wider area ...

Elementary Topology- Problem Textbook.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Elementary ...

The scale-free topology of market investments - Semantic Scholar
Dec 18, 2004 - E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Garlaschelli). ... Automated Quotations [18] (NASDAQ) in the year 2000. The number M of assets in.

Weighted Evolving Networks: Coupling Topology and ...
Jun 4, 2004 - networks have been formulated [3]. ... respectively; in social systems, the weight of inter- ... of the network (wij 0 if the nodes i and j are not.

Novel Topology Generation Concept for Grid Connected PV ... - IJRIT
The grid neutral line connected to directly to the negative pole of the dc bus, .... The six switches are control in the inverse sine carrier pulse width modulation.

Network topology and parameter estimation - BMC Systems Biology
Feb 7, 2014 - using fluorescent data from protein time courses is a key ..... time course predictions. Score Bayesian Decompose network". Selection of data. Sampling. Orangeballs. 0.0229. 3.25E-03. 0.002438361. 1.21E - 25. 27.4 no yes ...... TC EB PM

Coevolution of Glauber-like Ising dynamics and topology
Received 13 June 2009; published 13 November 2009. We study the coevolution of a generalized Glauber dynamics for Ising spins with tunable threshold and of the graph topology where the dynamics takes place. This simple coevolution dynamics generates

Topology-induced coarsening in language games
Jan 18, 2006 - sis of the dynamical evolution. Figure 3 reports a typical evolution of agents on a one- dimensional lattice, by displaying one below the other a ...