WT/DS485/6

27 February 2015 (15-1171)

Page: 1/3 Original: English

RUSSIA - TARIFF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL AND MANUFACTURING PRODUCTS REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL BY THE EUROPEAN UNION The following communication, dated 26 February 2015, from the delegation of the European Union to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 6.2 of the DSU. _______________ My authorities have instructed me to request the establishment of a panel pursuant to Articles 4 and 6 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU") and Article XXIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994") regarding the tariff treatment the Russian Federation ("Russia") accords to certain goods in both agricultural and manufacturing sectors. On 31 October 2014, the European Union requested consultations with Russia, pursuant, inter alia, to Articles 1 and 4 of the DSU and Article XXII of the GATT 1994. The European Union held consultations with Russia on 28 November 2014. Unfortunately, the consultations failed to settle the dispute. As a result, the European Union respectfully requests that a Panel be established pursuant to Articles 4 and 6 of the DSU and Article XXIII of the GATT 1994 to examine this matter on the basis of the standard terms of reference, as set out in Article 7.1 of the DSU. Russia subjects a number of goods to import duties inconsistent with its Schedule of Concessions and Commitments annexed to the GATT 1994 ("Schedule"). In particular, Russia applies customs duties that are in excess of those set forth and provided for in its Schedule as regards the goods concerned. Firstly, for certain goods (paper and paperboard products), Russia applies ad valorem duty rates – as provided for in the legal instruments referred to below – that exceed the ad valorem bound rates. This specifically concerns five measures at issue: five tariff lines (4810 22 900 0, 4810 29 300 0, 4810 92 300 0, 4810 13 800 9 and 4810 19 900 0), for which the applied duty of 15% or 10%, depending on the tariff line, clearly exceeds the bound rate which is set at 5%. In addition, with respect to tariff line 4810 92 100 0, despite the fact that the currently applicable duty rate appears to be equal to the bound rate (5%), the legal instruments referred to below provide for a duty rate of 15%, and therefore exceeding the bound rate, applicable as from 1 January 2016 (sixth measure at issue). Secondly, for certain other goods (including palm oil and its fractions, refrigerators and combined refrigerator – freezers), the legal instruments referred to below provide for a type/structure of duty that varies from the type/structure of duty recorded in the Schedule. The structure and design of those specific variations results in duties being levied in excess of those provided for in the Schedule for these goods whenever the customs value is below a certain level. In some of those instances, Russia applies combined duty rates (combining an ad valorem and a specific element; for instance "3% but not less than 0,09 EUR/kg") in relation to goods for which the Schedule provides for ad valorem rates (for instance "3%"). In such cases, the specific

WT/DS485/6 -2element of the applied rate determines the minimum amount of duty to be levied. As a result, duties are imposed in excess of the bound rate in cases where the customs value of the good is below a certain level. Russia accords such treatment to the following tariff lines: 1511 90 190 2, 1511 90 990 2 (palm oil) and 8418 10 200 1 (combined refrigerator – freezers). The duties applied to those three tariff lines constitute the seventh, eighth and ninth measure at issue. In certain other instances, Russia applies combined duty rates (combining an ad valorem and a specific element; for instance "16%, but not less than 0,156 EUR/L") in relation to goods for which the Schedule provides for a formula that requires Russia to impose the lower of the amounts of duty: either the amount based on the application of an ad valorem rate or of the amount based on the application of a combined rate (for instance "16,7%; or 16%, but not less than 0,156 EUR/L; whichever is the lower"). As a result, duties are imposed in excess of the bound rate in cases where the customs value of the good is below a certain level. Russia accords such treatment to the following tariff lines: 8418 10 800 1 and 8418 21 100 0 (refrigerators and combined refrigerator – freezers). The duties applied to those two tariff lines constitute the tenth and eleventh measure at issue respectively. In relation to the seventh to eleventh measures at issue, Russia provides for no mechanism, such as a "ceiling" on the level of the applied duty, that would prevent the ad valorem equivalents of the duties actually applied from exceeding the level of the bound duties. In addition, it appears that the legal instruments referred to below systematically provide, in relation to a significant number of tariff lines, for a type/structure of duty that varies from the type/structure of duty recorded in the Schedule in a way that leads to the application of duties in excess of those provided for in the Schedule for those goods whenever the customs value is below a certain level, in one of the two ways described above (in relation to the seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh measure at issue), without providing for a mechanism that would prevent the ad valorem equivalents of the applied duties from exceeding the level of the bound duties. This general practice constitutes the twelfth measure at issue. On the basis of the information obtained in the course of consultations, the European Union understands that Russia imposes these measures through, inter alia, the following legal instruments1: -

Common Customs Tariff of the Customs Union of the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russian Federation, approved by Decision No. 54 of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 16 July 2012 "On the Common Customs Tariff Regulation of the Customs Union of the Republic of Belarus, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation" (entered into force on 23.08.2012), as amended by subsequent acts, including by: -

Decision No. 9 of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 29 January 2014 "On the determination of the import customs duty rates in the Common Customs Tariff of the Customs Union with regard to certain types of paper and paperboard";

-

Decision No. 77 of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 26 May 2014 amending the Single Commodity Nomenclature of Foreign Economic Activities of the Customs Union and the Common Customs Tariff of the Customs Union in respect of certain goods in accordance with the WTO accession commitments of the Russian Federation and approving the draft Decision of the Council of Eurasian Economic Commission;

-

Decision No. 52 of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 16 July 2014 "On the determination of the import customs duty rates in the Common Customs Tariff

1 The European Union understands that those legal instruments continue to apply within the context of the Eurasian Economic Union. The European Union also understands that after the entry into force of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union between the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan and Russia, the Common Customs Tariff is referred to as the "Common External Tariff of the Eurasian Economic Union" (see inter alia Decision No 112 of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 10 December 2014). This request also covers any amendments, replacements, extensions, implementing measures or other related measures that would result from the entry into force of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union between the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan and Russia.

WT/DS485/6 -3of the Customs Union in respect of certain goods in accordance with the obligations of the Russian Federation in the WTO"; -

Decision No. 47 of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 23 June 2014 "Amending the Single Commodity Nomenclature of Foreign Economic Activity of the Customs Union and the Common Customs Tariff of the Customs Union in respect of certain goods in accordance with the obligations of the Russian Federation to the WTO";

-

Decision No. 103 of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission of 7 July 2014, Moscow "On the determination of the import customs duty rates in the Common Customs Tariff of the Customs Union with regard to certain types of tires and retreated tires and certain types of footwear in accordance with the obligations of the Russian Federation in the WTO and on the approval of the draft decision of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission".

For each of the measures referred to above, this request also covers any amendments, replacements, extensions, implementing measures or other related measures adopted by the bodies of the Eurasian Economic Commission and/or by the bodies of the Eurasian Economic Union and/or by the legislative or executive authorities of Russia. The European Union considers that each of these measures is inconsistent with Russia's obligations under the following WTO provisions: •

Article II:1 (a) and (b) of the GATT 1994 because Russia failed to accord to commerce of another Member treatment no less favourable than that provided for in the appropriate Part of its Schedule annexed to the GATT 1994; because Russia has failed to exempt products which are the products of territories of another Member, on their importation into Russia's territory, from ordinary customs duties in excess of those set forth and provided in Russia's Schedule, and because Russia has failed to exempt such products from all other duties or charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with the importation in excess of those imposed on the date of this Agreement or those directly and mandatorily required to be imposed thereafter by legislation in force in the importing territory on that date.

These measures adversely affect exports of goods from the European Union to Russia, and they nullify or impair the benefits accruing to the European Union directly or indirectly under the covered agreements. __________

TARIFF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ... - WorldTradeLaw.net

Feb 27, 2015 - RUSSIA - TARIFF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL. AND MANUFACTURING PRODUCTS ... agricultural and manufacturing sectors. On 31 October 2014, the European Union requested ... 1 January 2016 (sixth measure at issue). Secondly, for certain other goods (including palm oil and its ...

28KB Sizes 1 Downloads 320 Views

Recommend Documents

Russia - Tariff Treatment of Agricultural and ... - WorldTradeLaw.net
Nov 4, 2014 - Economic Commission of 16 July 2012 "On the Common Customs Tariff Regulation of the Customs Union of the Republic of Belarus, Republic ...

Russia - Tariff Treatment of Agricultural and ... - WorldTradeLaw.net
Nov 4, 2014 - My authorities have instructed me to request consultations with the Government of the Russian. Federation ("Russia"), pursuant to Articles 1 ...

Certain Characteristics of Unlicensed Tree Expert Companies ...
(69.91%) found to be advertising tree services online were unlicensed tree experts (UnLTEs). .... other records in the listing of over 1,400 UnLTEs be- ... online directories of Verizon and AT&T telephone listings is ..... fónicas en Internet.

SESB tariff booklet 2014.pdf
Page 3 of 17. SESB tariff booklet 2014.pdf. SESB tariff booklet 2014.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying SESB tariff booklet 2014.pdf.

Certain Affinity - googleusercontent.com
Establish data driven decisions as a key pillar of the design ... analytics provider will ever have everything you need out of the box, it is great to have a solution ...

Certain Affinity - googleusercontent.com
pillar of the design process starting in pre-production ... Patrick Bergman, Business Development Manager. Background ... Ramping Up Reporting. Certain Affinity has used Google Analytics for website analytics since 2005, and began talking ...

Certain Affinity - googleusercontent.com
a successful soft launch. “The flexibility ... All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.

Certain Affinity
The Google Mobile App Analytics was pivotal ... first mobile title, Age of Booty: Tactics ... The most notable among those are co-development on the Left 4. Dead ...

Tariff 2015 ctc.pdf
Bakery Shop, Fast Food, Late Night Coffee Shop,. Cocktail Bar Lounge,. Air Conditioned Multi Cuisine Restaurant,. Roof Top Multi Cuisine Restaurants.

Tariff 2015 ctc.pdf
Page 1 of 3. Daily Buffet Spread. (Breakfast, Lunch & Dinner). Buffet Dinner. at Terrace Treat. Buffet Lunch. at Golden Treat. Everyday between. 7:30 to 11:00 P.M.. Bakery Shop, Fast Food, Late Night Coffee Shop,. Cocktail Bar Lounge,. Air Conditione

Certain Affinity
Approach. • Establish data driven decisions as a key pillar of the design process starting in pre-production. • Integrate Google Analytics to understand and optimize UI flow, customer behavior, and accessibility. • Leverage GA for A/B testing t

BroadBand tariff March2012 .pdf
BroadBand tariff March2012 .pdf. BroadBand tariff March2012 .pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying BroadBand tariff March2012 .pdf.

Aspects of Insulin Treatment
The Valeritas h-Patch technology has been used to develop a .... termed “cool factors,” such as colored and ... and overused sites, and there is a huge stress of ...

Efficient approximation of the solution of certain ...
May 24, 2011 - ing an ε-approximation of such a solution by means of a homotopy contin- .... the point of view of its solution by the so-called robust universal ...

Tariff Design with Varying Degrees of Commitment
Tariff Design with Varying Degrees of Commitment. Maria Cristina T. Terra*. Graduate School of Economics – Fundação Getulio Vargas. Abstract: This paper ..... the problem, a graphic interpretation of the dynamics is presented. ...... Benabou, Rol

Certain Affinity
Analytics. “Google Analytics was a vital component of our overall development process. It ... Patrick Bergman, Business Development Manager ... The early inclusion of GA into the design process resulted in easy access to analytics to assist in infl

Certain Knowledge
and district attorneys investigate and prosecute crimes: Why wasn't this ... began interviewing witnesses and reviewing evidence, the state's case against ...

Aspects of Insulin Treatment
“modal day” display particularly useful. Data analysis with artificial intelligence software should be designed to recognize glucose patterns and alert patients and.

Roam1 Tariff Sheet -
Best value plans. Country ... Calls to India- Prefix. (019)* ... INR 6.00. India SMS ... GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) is pre activated on our SIM cards. GPRS will be ... service provider. ... are requested to intimate ROAM1 on email/Call.

MEASURES AFFECTING TARIFF CONCESSIONS - WorldTradeLaw.net
Apr 17, 2015 - Council Regulation (EC) No 580/2007 of 29 May 2007 concerning the ... Regulation (EU) No 1218/2012 of the European Parliament and of the ...

Feed-In Tariff
replace oil imports with natural gas, coal, biofuels, or renewable electricity. ..... energy, yet the public and private support behind renewable energy was enough ..... the transportation sector becomes more electric-based and the need to replace ..

Roam1 Tariff Sheet -
Dialing Instructions: International Calls: for dialing India. Country code for India is: 91. There are 2 options to Dial India: Using (+): which is +

Room​​Category Room Tariff Single Double
Room​​Category. Room. Tariff. Single. Double. Standard​​Non​​A/C. 1100/-. 1250/-. Executive​​Standard​​Non​​A/C. 1250/-. 1400/-.