ISSUE ARTICULATION

LIFE SUPPORT

TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

NEW NEED/ PRODUCT/FEATURE/ FUNCTIONALITY/ REQUIREMENT/ ENHANCEMENT/ BUG/INCIDENT/...

FACILITY

INDIVIDUAL START ECONOMIC INQUIRY SYSTEM

HUMAN NEED

ISSUE REQUIREMENTS/ OBJECTIVES ARE DETAILED IF AVAILABLE

THE NEED OR DEMAND IS DESCRIBED IN DETAIL

HABITAT SYSTEMS TEAM

SENSOR INCIDENT RESPONSE

GOOD & SERVICE CONTINUUM

ASSIGN PRIMARY OPERATIONAL PROCESS IF AVAILABLE

ASSIGN PRIMARY HABITAT SYSTEM IF AVAILABLE

ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

ACKNOWLEDGE

ASSIGN ISSUE CATEGORY IF AVAILABLE

STRATEGIC PLANNING & PRESERVATIO N

Version Number: 001 Date of Last Revision: 2014/10/27 Date of Last Release: 2014/10/27 New Comments: None at the present time Comment History:

ACTION

SUBMIT ISSUE

ECONOMIC ‘DEMAND’ ISSUE INSTANCE CREATION

INFORMED

NOT AN OPERATIONA L PROCESS

START TRACKING OF ISSUE THROUGH INQUIRY TRACKING SYSTEM

INPUT

RECOGNITION INQUIRY

(THE ECONOMIC OUTPUT)

SINGLE USER ITEM USAGE AND CONSUMPTION BY COMMON ACCESS

FIX & UPDATE IF POSSIBLE

THEN RECYCLED

REUSE ITEM

FIX, UPDATE, REFURBISH

WHEN INFORMATION IS PROVIDED

PATTERN RECOGNITION ENGINE

INPUT

ASKS MULTIPLE USER ITEM

SEND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM ARTICULATING ENTITY

GOOD/SERVICE SPECTRUM/CONTINUUM

SYSTEM ACCESS / USE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED

NO, ISSUE NOT IDENTIFIABLE

COMMON ACCESS / USE INFORM ISSUE ARTICULATION ENTITY OF ASSIGNMENT ALTERATION

THESE OPERATIONAL PROCESSES RUN ALONGSIDE ALL ACCESS RECOURSE SPACE ACCESSED BY INTERDISCPLINARY SYSTEMS TEAMS

IN ORDER TO OPERATE SOME ITEMS SAFELY INDIVIDUALS MUST HAVE TRAINING WHEN COMMUNITY ACCESS ITEMS ARE “BEING USED” BY AN ENTITY THEN THEY ARE IN THE USER’S PERSONAL SPACE AND NOT ACCESSIBLE TO OTHERS

DEVELOPMENT & TESTING

WILL USAGE BE SHARED

YES

THE USE OF SOME ITEMS MUST BE SCHEDULED AND OTHERS ARE AVAILABLE ON DEMAND

COMMUNITY ACCESS

IMPLEMENTATION & INTEGRATION

OPEN

VALIDATION TO VERIFY THE DESIGN MEETS THE USERS’ REQUIREMENTS

THIS IS A ‘HELP’ ISSUE WITH THE SERVICE SYSTEM ITSELF

YES, AND

ELECTRONIC PERFORMANCE SUPPORT SYSTEM / HELP DESK

ASSIGN TO

YES, ISSUE TYPE IDENTIFIED

AUTOMATED HELP NOT SUFFICIENT

WERE THE ISSUE’S ASSIGNMENTS ACCURATE?

SUB-ASSIGN ISSUE TO SYSTEMS TEAM TECHNICAL SUPPORT VIA SCHEDULING ROTATION

NO

YES & SIMULTANEOUSLY CONFIRMATION NOT RECEIVED, NO INPUT/ EVIDENCE

NO

SEND CONFIRMATION OR VERIFICATION REQUEST

CONFIRMATION RECEIVED, INPUT/ EVIDENCE

PERSONAL ACCESS

IS IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OR CONFIRMATION REQUIRED?

YES

NO

A PRODUCT MOST EFFICIENTLY CONSUMED VIA SHARING

IS EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT FOR VERIFICATION

WILL THE USER USE THE ENTIRE LIFESPACE OF THE PRODUCT? NO RECOURSE SPACE

HIGH TEMPORALITY, USE AND RETURN, HIGH LOCALIZATION

IS THE ISSUE RECOGNIZABLE?

DOES NOT REMAIN IN THE CONTINUOUS PERSONAL SPACE OF SOMEONE OR A FAMILY

CLOSED AS A NONISSUE

OPEN

WILL THE PRODUCT REMAIN IN THE CONTINUOUS PERSONAL SPACE OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR FAMILY?

THIS IS A DUPLICATE ISSUE INSTANCE

YES

IS THE ISSUE INSTANCE RECOGNIZED?

YES, AND

NO, AND THIS ISSUE WAS RESOLVED

YES, AND NEW ISSUE INSTANCE

NO

NOT A PERSONAL PRIVACY, EMOTIVE ISSUE

THE SUPRA- OR SUBISSUE THIS ISSUE INSTANCE CONCERNS IS ONGOING

DOES THIS PRODUCT INVOLVE PERSONAL EMOTIVE PRIVACY?

FULL SITUATION AWARENESS

YES, AND

TEXT

REQUIRES

ISSUE MERGER

ISSUE ANALYSIS

ADD

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS FROM THE REAL WORLD COMMUNITY INFORMATION MODEL

CONTEXT

SUBTEXT DATA

CONCEPT ION

PERSONAL ACCESS & PERSONAL SPACE ITEMS DO NOT BECOME ACCESSIBLE TO SYSTEM TEAMS

ASSESS & ACT

PROJECT ION

ASKS PERCEPT ION IS THIS ISSUE ASSIGNED TO INCIDENT RESPONSE?

STRATEGIC PRESERVATIO N PLANNING

REASSIGN TO

DOES THIS INVOLVE THE PROCESS OF ADAPTING A SYSTEM TO A NEW NEED?

NO

DOES THIS INVOLVE THE ONGOING PROCESS OF PRESERVING SYSTEMS TO MAINTAIN THEIR ONGOING FUNCTION?

NO

THIS IS THE TECHNICAL PROCESS OF SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

INPUT

SYN/ACK

ASSIGN TO & ACTIVATE

ACT BASED ON

EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES ACTIVATED SYNCHRONOUSLY

NO

NO

IS THIS ISSUE ASSIGNED TO MAINTENANCE OR OPERATIONS?

HAS SOMETHING FAILED (BREAKDOWN)?

YES

IS THE CORE FUNCTIONING OF THE HABITAT SYSTEM IMPACTED?

YES

IS THE CORE STRUCTURE OF THE HABITAT EFFECTED?

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE ISSUE

YES

EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE SERVICES & TEAMS

ASSIGN TO & ACTIVATE

ACT TOWARD

A RETURN TO SAFE AND OPERATIONALLY EFFICIENT CONDITION

ACT BASED ON

YES

CALAMITY TO HABITAT LIFE IS OCCURING HERE

ARE STRATEGICALLY PLANNED RESOURCES SUFFICIENT?

DISASTER RECOVERY AND SYSTEM CONTINUITY PROTOCOLS

NO

QUALIFIER

SYSTEM AND COMMUNITY ACCESS PRODUCTS BECOME PRIORITY ACCESSIBLE BY ASSIGNED SYSTEM TEAMS

THIS IS THE TECHNICAL PROCESS OF MAINTAINING THE OPERATION OF SYSTEM SERVICES

CRITICAL MAJOR NO

NO THIS IS A ‘CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE’ ISSUE AND MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A CRITICALITY ASSOCIATION

MEDIUM MINOR

ASSESS & ACT IS A FUNCTIONAL OPERATION IN THE PROCESS OF FAILING HRS/MINS/SEC?

HIGH LEVEL CRITICAL MAINTENANCE (CRITICALITY)

YES

COSMETIC EXPERT INTER DISCIPLINARY SYSTEMS TEAM

NO

WHAT FORM OF MAINTENACE IS THIS?

ROUTINELY KNOWN OR SCHEDULED

ASSIGN TO

‘BREAKDOWN MAINTENANCE’ IS NOT A PART OF THIS MODEL (I.E., WAITING UNTIL A SYSTEM FAILS TO REPAIR OR REPLACE IT)

INVOLVES CONTINUOUS “INNER LOOP”

RESOURCE BUDGETING

ROUTINE / PLANNED / PERIODIC / PREVENTATIVE / SCHEDULED / TIME-BASED / MAINTENANCE

SHUTDOWN CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE

DOES THIS CONCERN A MODIFICATION OR IMPROVEMENT TO AN EXISTING HABITAT SERVICE SYSTEM?

PREDICTIVE- & CONDITIONBASED MAINTENANCE

DEFERRED MAINTENANCE

IS A FUNCTIONAL OPERATION IN THE PROCESS OF FAILING < 5DAYS?

MEDIUM LEVEL CRITICAL MAINTENANCE (CRITICALITY)

YES

MAINTENANCE EFFORT REDUCTION AND PREVENTION THROUGH OPTIMIZATION

THIS ISSUE IS ASSIGNED TO STRATEGIC PRESERVATION PLANNING

YES

CONDUCT FORMAL INVESTIGATION OF INCIDENT

WHY DID SAFEGUARDS FAIL?

USER SELFCREATES SOLUTION

PLANNING INQUIRY AND ABILITY THRESHOLDS

REVISE EVIDENCEBASED PRACTICE PROTOCOLS

WHAT IS THE OBJECTS ASSESSED, PREDICTED, AND MEASURED MAXIMUM DURABILITY?

RESPONSIBLE EXPERT & COORDINATOR INTERDISCIPLIN ARY TEAMS

INFORM

ACT ON

WHAT DURABILITY FACTORS (OR VARIABLES) ARE KNOWN?

EVIDENCEBASED PRACTICE PROTOCOLS & PRACTICAL PROTOCOLS

COORDINATE THE DURABILITY FACTORS WITH THE AVAILABLE MATERIALS TO DETERMINE A REPLACEMENT/ MAINTENANCE PROBABILITY TIMEFRAME

ASSIGN TO

EXPERT INTER DISCIPLINARY SYSTEMS TEAM FOR SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT

COULD THE EMERGENCY HAVE BEEN PREVENTED?

MICRO-OBJECT OPTIMIZATION CALCULATION

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY INQUIRY

INTEROPERABILITY THE COST OF A SOLUTION AS ITS TOTAL MEASURABLE EFFECT IN REDUCING ACCESS TO RESOURCES FOR OTHER NEEDS DUE TO THE NEW ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES

APPLY UNIVERSAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE COMPONENT AS A ‘GENRE’ CALCULATE

RECOVERY RESPONSE

YES

YES

IDENTIFY CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS, EVIDENCE PRESERVATION

ACT BASED ON

RECOVERY RESPONSE

DOES THIS INVOLVE THE PROCESS OF RECOVERING FROM A DISRUPTION / INCIDENT

THIS ISSUE DOES NOT HAVE AN ASSIGNED OPERATIONAL PROCESS

IS A FORMAL INVESTIGATION REQUIRED

LOW LEVEL CRITICAL MAINTENANCE (CRITICALITY)

NO YES

NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED

DURABILITY

RESPONSIBLE EXPERT & COORDINATOR INTERDISCIPLIN ARY TEAMS

ASSIGN TO & ACTIVATE

REVIEW OF ACTION

NO IS A FUNCTIONAL OPERATION IN THE PROCESS OF FAILING < 15DAYS?

NO

CRITICAL RESPONSE

VALUE ALIGNMENT INQUIRY

YES

NO MAINTENANCE PRIORITIES

YES

YES TEHNICAL ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS

YES

THIS IS AN EMERGENCY

YES

EVIDENCEBASED PRACTICE PROTOCOLS & PRACTICAL PROTOCOLS

THIS OFTEN OCCURS IN PARALLEL

DOES THIS INVOLVES THE PROCESS OF UPDATING OR IMPROVING COMPONENTS OF A SYSTEM BASED UPON A PLANNED IMPROVEMENT?

YES

IS HUMAN LIFE OR SAFETY AT IMMINENT RISK?

EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES & TEAMS

THIS IS A NOVEL NEED, GOOD OR SERVICE?

DOES THE DESIGN CONFORM TO OR REPLACE AN EXISTING COMPONENT’S DESIGN

YES

MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF GENRE COMPONENTS FOR THE GIVEN SERVICE (OR SOLUTION)

ENVIRONMENTAL REAL WORLD COSTS / TRUE COSTS (EXTERNAL CONSTRIANTS AND “EXTERNALITIES”) FOR EACH INDIVIDUALLY ASSESSED RESOURCE

ASSESS & MEASURE

NO IS THIS A NEW STANDARDIZATION DUE TO AN “EVOLUTION” IN UNDERSTANDING & DEVELOPMENT?

IDENTIFY

INCLUDE RESOURCE TRENDING DATA

IDENTIFIED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

SOLUTION INQUIRY OUTPUT

YES

WHAT ARE THE CONSUMPTION RATES OF THE RESOURCE (I.E., DEPLETION RATE)?

CONTINUOUS STRATEGIC SOLUTION PLANNING LIFECYCLE

SURVEY: WHAT IS THE OBJECTS DESIRED LIFESPACE?

DISTURBANCE

HOW WILL BYPRODUCTS, POLLUTION & CONTAMINATION (HABITAT DAMAGE) IMPACT RESOURCE REGENERATION?

AT WHAT RATE IS THE RESOURCE REGENERATING (NATIVE SYSTEM)?

DISTURBANCE

WHAT IS THE ECOSYSTEM SERVICE CAPACITY?

DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM THRESHOLD

TECHNOLOGY APPLIED THRESHOLD

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY & ECOLOGICAL MODELING

NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL / ECOLOGICAL / SOCIETY SUPPORTING CARRYING CAPACITY

USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND THE APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY TO EXTEND THE CARRYING CAPACITY

WHAT IS THE ENVIRONMENTS ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY?

INFLUENCES

PHENOMENOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE / FORCES (E.G., THE WEATHER)

NO CORE HABITAT SERVICES ARE CONTINUOUSLY PLANNED

THE ALTERNATIVE WITH THE HIGHEST OPTIMIZATION (I.E., LOWEST ECONOMIC PRODUCTION COST TO OTHER NEEDS)

IDENTIFY MEASURABLE RELATIONSHIPS AND CALCULATE THE CAPACITY OF A SYSTEM OR STRUCTURE TO MAINTAIN AN OPTIMAL, FUNCTIONAL, ORIGINAL, OR CURRENT STATE (OR CONDITION) OVER TIME

POTENTIAL REDESIGN AT THIS POINT DUE TO NEWLY DISCOVERED KNOWLEDGE AND TECHNOLOGY

DEVELOP A NEW [INFORMATION INTERFACE] STANDARD FOR THE ‘GENRE’

SUSTAINABLE DO THE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DESIGN SPECIFICATION’S SOLUTIONS EXCEED A THRESHOLD?

YES

NO UNSUSTAINABLE

REDESIGN REQUIRED

THIS ISSUE IS PRIORITIZED AS A ‘DISCRETIONARY’ ISSUE

SCHEDULED PLANNING

TECHNICAL SOLUTION DESIGN INPUT

RESOURCE INQUIRY

ADAPTABILITY

NATURAL SERVICES

OPTIMIZE THE FLEXIBILITY OF REPLACING COMPONENTS IN THE OBJECT [SYSTEM]

TECHNICAL SOLUTION INQUIRY

IDENTIFY POTENTIAL AREAS WHERE MODULARIZATION MAY BE APPLIED

NO

IS THE DEMAND FOR A PRODUCT THAT WILL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE FACILITY’S OPERATIONAL PROCESSES?

YES

NO

IS THIS A DEMAND FOR A COMMUNITY OR PERSONAL ACCESS ITEM WITH A LIFE OR TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT DESIGNATION?

YES

THIS IS A SYSTEMS ACCESS SOLUTION

AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CORE & FACILITY SYSTEMS STRATEGIC PLANNING TEAM

THIS IS A DEMAND FOR A DISCRETIONARY PERSONAL ACCESS ITEM

NO

INITIATE

YES

INFORMATION SENSORS

USERS

SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION EXCHANGE FACILIATES THE RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE

FORMAL SPECIFICATIONS

THE ISSUER OR TEAM OF ISSUERS WITH A SCHEDULED DISTRETIONARY TAG

INPUT

REDEFINE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION (SRS)

OUPUT

RENEWABLE MATERIAL RESOURCES

ORGANISMS

RESOURCE PROCESSING

RESOURCE “EXTRACTION”

NON-RENEWABLE MATERIAL RESOURCES

RESOURCE PRIOR TO FINAL FORM

NO

NO IDENTIFIED RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

IS THIS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE

INPUT

IS THIS A MATERIAL RESOURCES

OUTPUT

YES

DOES THE RESOUCE EXIST AS KNOWN ‘COMMON HERITAGE’ IN THE COMMUNITY?

NO

YES

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND PRESERVATION

IDENTIFY NEXT AVAILABILITY OF FINAL RESOURCE PRODUCT

WHEN WILL A SUFFICIENT QUANTITY OF THE FINAL PRODUCT OF THIS RESOURCE EXIST TO EQUALLY MEET DEMAND?

DOES THE RESOURCE EXIST AS ITS FINAL USABLE FORM?

YES

IS THE RESOURCE ALLOCATED?

YES

NO DOES THE RESOURCE EXIST OUTSIDE OF THE COMMUNITY?

NO

NOTIFY SOLUTION INQUIRY OF INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES AND SEEK A MORE EFFICIENT DESIGN SOLUTION OR DELAY UNTIL SUFFICIENT RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE

ARE THE QUALITIES AND CONDITION OF YES THE RESOURCE SUFFICIENT FOR THE SOLUTION DESIGN

UNALLOCATED

YES

NO

ALLOCATED

HAVE THE RESOURCES EXPIRED OR DETERIORATED

IS THIS A RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCE (E.G., SOLAR, WIND, HYDRO, TIDAL, GEOTHERMAL, ORGANISMS)

INPUT

ANALYSE THE CURRENT SYSTEM WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE IDENTIFIABLE REQUIREMENTS

NEED & USE & REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

ASK WHAT PROBLEM IS BEING SLOVED? WHAT IS THE FUNCTIONAL INTENTION?

NO

YES

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

YES

YES

LOAD BALANCING PROTOCOLS

HABITAT SYSTEM INTERACTION WITH OTHER ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

IS THE RESOURCE NEEDED FOR INCIDENT RESPONSE?

THIS ISSUE IS DEFERRED

THIS ISSUE IS DEFERRED

OPEN

OPEN

ASSIGN TO

RECOURSE SPACE

SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY PRIORITIZED SCHEDULING

WERE THE RESOURCES DAMAGED

INVESTIGATE WHY THE RESOURCE QUALITIES & CONDITIONS ARE NOT SUFFICIENT

NO

WHAT FORM OF CONSUMPTION DOES THE SOLUTION INVOLVE?

THE RESOURCE REQUIRES DEVELOPMENT

YES

THIS IS A SCARCE COMMON HERITAGE RESOURCE

RESOURCE RECOGNITION ENGINE

YES

IS AN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCE RECOGNIZED

YES

INFORM SOLUTION INQUIRY OF ALTERNATIVE RESOURCE

NO

THIS INVOLVES A NEED FOR WHICH THE HABITAT DOES NOT HAVE A SERVICE SYSTEM

ENERGY NOT AVAILABLE

NO

ACTIVATE [MATERIAL] RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

FEEDBACK INQUIRY

SOLUTION REDESIGN REQUIRED

ACTION

DESIGN

TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED ANALYSIS & OPTIMIZATION

CONDUCT SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION

OPTIIZE USAGE OF RENEWABLE & NONRENEWABLE RESOURCES

A TECHNICAL PROBLEM EXISTS

UNIQUE EXTERNALSYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR INTERACTIONS WITH OUTSIDE SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEMS

PROTOCOL ACCESS DRIVEN

OUTPUT

NO

NO THIS ISSUE INVOLVES SCIENTIFIC STUDY

RECOURSE SPACE

DOES A HABITAT SERVICE SYSTEM EXIST TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS

ENERGY RESOURCE NOT SUSTAINABLE BY CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION

SOLUTION’S RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS ARE FEASIBLE

NO

NO REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION LOOP

NO

SCHEDULING PROTOCOL

ACTIVATE

YES

YES

FULL STUDY OF NEED AND PROBLEM DOES THE COMMUNITY HAVE THE TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE?

ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES

PRODUCTIVITY, CONSUMPTION, DECOMPOSITION, ENERGY FLOW, MOVEMENT, CYCLING, INTERACTIONS

MINERAL RESOURCE

YES

WHAT DOES THE SYSTEM NEED TO DO TO FULFILL THESE NEW FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

DISCOVER REQUIREMENTS ARE THE REQUIREMENTS VALID AND DO THEY HAVE THESE CONTRADICT THE NO REQUIREMENTS DEMAND ALREADY BEEN MET EXPECTATION (REQUIREMENTS VALIDATION)? YES YES

ECOSYSTEMS, POPULATIONS, SOIL, WATER, ATMOSPHERE

EARTH & OUR COMMON HERITAGE: ATMOSPHERE, HYDROSPHERE, SEDIMENT, ROCKS, SOIL, BIOSPHERE

PROXIMITY STRATEGY

NO

IS THIS AN ENERGY RESOURCE

WHAT DOES IT NEED TO DO -AND- WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS?

COMMUNITY OF PERSONAL PROJECTS

RESOURCE CULTIVATION INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMS

HUMANS ARE NOT RESOURCES

ASK

OUTPUT

TECHNOLOGY

IDENTIFY RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

SOLUTION INQUIRY OUTPUT

PRODUCE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION

MATERIAL RESOURCES

EFFORT

LOCALIZATION OF RESOURCE GENERATION

OUPUT INTERDISCIPLINARY SYSTEMS TEAMED PROJECT PLANNING

ENERGY

ECOLOGICAL COMPONENTS

ACCURACY MEASUREMENT

WHAT IS THE MOST EFFICIENT DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY AND DESSEMBLY? (FOR OBJECT SERVICE TRANSFORMATION)

NO, ASSIGN TO

AN INTERDISCIPLINARY STRATEGIC PLANNING FACILITY TEAM

AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CORE HABITAT STRATEGIC PRESERVATION PLANNING TEAM

WHAT IS ITS DECOMPOSITION/ RECYCLING TIMEFRAME?

SURVEY: DOES ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL HAVE A DEMAND FOR THIS ITEM?

ASSIGN TO

ASSIGN TO

BY

BY

RESOURCE CONDITION

PREFERENCE INQUIRY

ASK

THIS IS INVOVLES A ‘STRATEGIC SERVICE PLAN’ WITHIN THE FACILITY SYSTEM

BY

USE MODELING AND SIMULATION TO TREND THE PROCESS OF UPDATING

YES

THIS IS A COMMUNITY OR PERSONAL ACCESS SOLUTION

ASSIGN TO

AN INTERDISCIPLINARY CORE HABITAT STRATEGIC PRESERVATION PLANNING TEAM

NO

YES

THIS IS A SYSTEMS ACCESS SOLUTION

ASSIGN TO

IS THIS A DEMAND FOR A COMMUNITY ACCESS ITEM?

COMMON HERITAGE RESOURCES ARE ACCOUNTED FOR BY SURVEYING THE HABITAT IN REAL TIME

CONTINUOUS SURVEYING, MONITORING, AND TRACKING OF RESOURCES

RESOURCE ATTRIBUTES & QUALITIES

ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTION ALIGNMENT IS THE DEMAND FOR A PRODUCT THAT WILL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE HABITAT’S CORE OPERATIONAL PROCESSES?

RESOURCE ACCOUNTING

CORRECT

ITERATION

RECYCLABILITY

EFFECTS

ENVIRONMENTAL INQUIRY

DESIGN SELECTION

STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ALL ORGANISMS

INFORM IS THE OBJECT CONDUCIVE FOR RECYCLING / DECOMPOSITION?

DETECTION OF EFFECTS

USAGE

INTERPERSONAL DATA UNDERSTANDING

HUMANKIND IMPACT STUDY

THE REAL WORLD COMMUNITY MODEL

INFORM

INDIVIDUAL DATA DESIGN ACCEPTED PURPOSE

FORWARD PATH CONCEPTUAL MODELING

MATERIAL INTEGRITY

CONSTRUCTOR

TASK

HABITAT INTEGRITY

INSTRUCTION

FUNCTIONAL & TECHNICAL DESIGN SYNTHESIS

LOGICAL SYSTEMS SPECIFICATION

ORGANISMAL IMPACT STUDY

MUTUALISM

WHAT ARE THE CHANGES IN THE STATES OF RELATIONSHIPS

COMMENSALISM

OUTPUTS

DECISION

STRATEGIES STANDARDS PROTOCOLS CALCULATIONS FEASIBLITY

INFORMATION REAL WORLD COMMUNITY MODEL

FEEDBAKC

WHAT ARE THE BYPRODUCTS OF ITS DECOMPOSITION/ RECYCLING?

DESIGN PARTIALLY REJECTED WITH REASONING AND SUGGESTIONS

ACTION WHAT IS ITS DECOMPOSITION/ RECYCLING TIMEFRAME?

FEEDBACK DESIGN REJECTED WITH REASONING AND SUGGESTIONS

EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT

FEEDBACK PATH

ASSESS POTENTIAL DAMAGE AND CHANGE IN RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE HABITAT’S ENVIRONMENTAL ECOSYSTEM

CONTINOUS INTEGRATION ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL CARETAKING STRATEGY AS CARETAKERS OF EARTH

AESTHETIC & PERCEPTUAL PREFERENCE INQUIRY

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY ON OTHER HABITAT ECOSYSTEM ORGANISMS

ABIOTIC COMPONENTS OF CLIMATE, PHYSIOGRAPHY, AND SOIL

QUALITY VARIABLES (E.G., THE QUALITY OF THE SOIL)

ASSESS POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO NATURAL SERVIVES WHICH PRODUCE OUR RESOURCES

HABITAT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY

DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM THRESHOLD

INTEGRITY ENGINEERING

BIOTIC (BIOTIC COMMUNITY) OF PLANTS, ANIMALS, AND MICROBES

PARASITISM TRANSFORMATION

FEEDBACK

WHAT WILL IT DO DIFFERENTLY BY SOLVING THIS PROBLEM?

HOW DOES IT DO WHAT IT DOES? WHAT WILL IT LOOK LIKE WHEN IN OPERATION IN THE HABITAT COMMUNITY?

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT/ STUDY

MIMICRY

BEHAVIOR/ FUNCTION INPUTS

STRUCTURAL & FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY

INPUT

ENVIRONMENT

FEEDBACK CAN THE OBJECT BE REYCYCLED AND DECOMPOSED?

SYMBIOTIC CONTINUUM

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

ASSIGN TASK INSTRUCTION

RESOURCE REGENERATION THE LOGICAL DESIGN CONVERTED INTO A PHYSICAL (TECHNICAL) DESIGN OR REALITY SIMULATION

DETAILED DESIGN SPECIFICATION (BLUEPRINT)

THE LIST OF TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS

SOLUTION ALTERNATIVES

OUTPUT

GATHER INFORMATION

NEW DATA REQUIRED

AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING SAMPLING FEEDBAKC IS A MECHANISM FOR ADAPTING TO CHANGE

UNDERSTAND INFORMATION INCLUDE

SIMULATION MODELING VERIFICATION WITH DESIGN SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

RECOGNITION

RUN ABSOLUTE AND THEORETICAL SIMULATIONS

NO EFFECT / EQUILIBRIUM MAINTAINED

EQUILIBRIUM NOT MAINTAINED

ACT TOWARD

ANALYSIS

STRATEGIC ADAPTATION

AUTOMATABILITY

PREFERENCE INQUIRY

IS HUMAN EFFORT REDUCED TO ITS DESIRED DESIGN MINIMUM? DOES THE SOLUTION INVOLVE AN AESTHETIC OR PERCEPTUAL (VS. FUNCTIONAL) DESIGN COMPONENT?

STRATEGIC PRESERVATION STRATEGIES & PROTOCOLS INCIDENT RESPONSE

WHAT CONTRIBUTION OF HUMAN LABOR IS SCHEDULED AND AVAILABLE?

STARATEGIC PRESERVATION PLANNING

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

WILL A CHANGE TO THE DESIGN COMPONENT IMPACT THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY OF THE SOLUTION?

IS THE OBJECT PRODUCABLE VIA FIXED AUTOMATION?

HOW CAN WE MINIMIZE THE DAMAGE TO OUR ENVIRONMENT & HARM TO OURSELVES?

HOW CAN WE MAXIMIZE THE EFFICIENT TEMPORAL DESIGN OF GOODS AND SERVICES (E.G., MODULAR, UPDATABLE, & TURNKEY)?

EFFECTIVENESS INQUIRY (A CONTINUOUS PROCESS) HOW CAN WE MAXIMIZE THE PRESERVATION OF OUR RESOURCES (CRADLE-TO-CRADLE DESIGN)?

OPTIMIZE STRATEGIC USE OF ALL RESOURCES YES

USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND THE APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY TO EXTEND THE CARRYING CAPACITY

CALCULATE STRUCTURAL LOAD CAPACITY (SIMULTANEOUS OCCUPANCY)

STRATEGIC SAFETY

INPUT

AUTO W/O HUMAN & SELF-SUSTAINING

STRATEGIC EFFICIENCY

STRATEGIC PRESERVATION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS & PROTOCOLS

STRATEGIC PRESERVATION

CLOSED

ACCOUNT FOR HUMAN EFFORT

ACCOUNT FOR FUTURE EFFORT

ACCOUNT FOR EFFICIENCY

AUTO W/ HUMAN & NOT SELF-SUSTAINING

LOW / NO AUTOMATION

DOES DISTRIBUTED AGREEMENT EXIST

DEFER INTO A HOLDING PATTERN

YES

DESIRED HUMAN EFFORT

RECONSTRUCTION

ROUTINE

MAINTENANCE

CORRECTIVE

NO

NO

REMEMBER THAT FUNCTIONAL DESIGN IS A TECHNICAL PROCESS AND NOT AN AESTHETIC OR PERCEPTUAL PREFERENCE

WILL THE SOLUTION BE INTEGRATED INTO THE CONTINUOUS INFASTRUCTURE (SPATIAL STRUCTURE) OF THE HABITAT?

YES

YES

SEND COMMUNITY REQUEST FOR DESIGN PREFERENCES

THIS DECISION INVOLVES A PREFERENCE

NO

CONDUCT A PREFERENCE SURVEY

NO

ARE THERE ANY PREFERENCES

YES

CAN THE PREFERENCE BE CLEARLY AND VISUALLY COMMUNICATED?

YES

WHAT CATEGORIES DO THE PREFERENCES FIT INTO (CATEGORIZATION)?

THE SOLUTION DOES NOT INVOLVE A PREFERENCE

THIS SOLUTION INVOLVES THE PERCEPTUAL / AESTHETIC PLANNING OF THE COMMUNITY’S SPATIAL STRUCTURE

THEN IT IS NOT A PREFERENCE

COMMUNITY PREFERENCES APPLY NATURAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

REDESIGN

STUDY/TEST/ CONDUCT SURVEY: ASK IS SENSE OF PERCEPTUAL CONTINUITY AND WELL-BIENG EVOKED?

OPEN

DEMAND SURVEY

ASK

LOVE

THIS DATA OBJECTIVELY INDICATES THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS WHO NEED OR WANT ACCESS TO THE SOLUTION

HOW MANY PEOPLE OR SYSTEMS TEAMS WANT ACCESS TO OR HAVE A USE FOR THE SOLUTION?

REMAINS IN ECONOMIC SYSTEM

WHAT ARE THE PERCEPTUAL PREFERENCE QUALITIES?

YES

PREFERENCE ENTERS JUSTICE INQUIRY

CONNECTEDNESS PEACE

EFFICIENCY DECREASE

JUSTICE INQUIRY

UPDATABILITY

PLANNED AESTHETIC STANDARDIZATION BY SYSTEMS TEAMS

UPGRADE IS IT POSSIBLE TO UPDATE THE DESIGN OF THE OBJECT VIA A DISTRIBUTED INFORMATION AGREEMENT NETWORK?

YES

SOLUTION ASSIGNEE SELECTS PERCEPTUAL DESIGN

NO MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PREFERENCE INQUIRY OUTPUT

WILL THE SOLUTION ACQUIRE THE ‘SYSTEM ACCESS’ DESIGNATION (SYSTEM USE)?

NO

DO PERCEPTUAL / AESTHETIC PREFERENCES EXIST?

YES

IS THIS A SHARED ‘COMMUNITY ACCESS/USE’ SOLUTION?

NO

IS CATEGORICAL CUSTOMIZATION TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE?

IS MASS CUSTOMIZATION / INDIVIDUALIZATION TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE (E.G., 3D PRINTING)?

THIS IS A ‘PERSONAL ACCESS/USE’ SOLUTION

YES

YES

MASS PERSONAL CUSTOMIZATION

NO

YES

DISTRIBUTED THRESHOLD AGREEMENT ON TOP 5 / 10 /15 /20 PERCEPTUAL DESIGNS

CATEGORICAL & FINITE CUSTOMIZATION (E.G., 5 STYLES OF SMART PHONE)

CATEGORIZE PREFERENCES

THIS OUTPUT INVOLVES AESTHETIC DESIGN PLANNING

IS THERE A THRESHOLD OF DISTRIBUTED AGREEMENT ON A SINGLE AESTHETIC DESIGN PLAN

NO (E.G., INFRASTRUCTURAL OUTPUT)

YES

FEASIBLE PREFERENCE

NO

TECHNICALLY SUSTAINABLE OBJECT CREATIVITY ABILITIES SOLUTION DESIGN SPECIFICATION

DURABILITY

ADAPTABILITY RECYCLABILITY UPDATABILITY

THESE ARE OUR PRINCIPAL TECHNICAL CALCULATION ABILITIES (I.E., CAPABILITIES). THEY ENABLE OUR FEASIBLE ORIENTATION TOWARD A SOLUTION DESIGNED TO COMPREHENSIVELY MEET THE CAPACITY NEEDS OF OUR “NEEDED” FULFILLMENT

NO

YES

PREFERENCE INQUIRY (DEMAND) OUTPUT

WILL THE SOLUTION ACQUIRE THE ‘SYSTEM ACCESS’ DESIGNATION (SYSTEM USE)?

NO

THIS INVOLVES ‘INSTANCE PRODUCTION’

WILL THE SOLUTION BE INTEGRATED INTO THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE HABITAT?

YES

THIS INVOLVES A STRUCTURAL SERVICE

THIS INVOLVES EITHER CONTINUOUS, AD HOC, OR CYCLIC PRODUCTION

THIS INVOLVES EITHER A CONTINUOUS, AD HOC, OR CYCLIC STRUCTURE

EQUITABILITY THRESHOLD

HOW MANY PEOPLE WANT ACCESS TO THE ECONOMIC OUTPUT (QUANTITY)?

INTEROPERABILITY

DO THE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS OF A PREFERENCE EXCLUDE IT AS A CURRENT ALTERNATIVE? YES

NO

THE SOLUTION SPECIFICATION

PREVENTATIVE

MEASURE BETWEEN PREFERENCES

NO

DEMAND INQUIRY

NO

APPLY NATURAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

NO

THIS SOLUTION INVOLVES INTEGRATION INTO THE AESTHETIC / PERCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE HABITAT

WHAT IS THE DEMAND FOR THE OBJECT?

IS THERE INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION AND THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IS TRIGGERED

USER SELECTION OF CATEGORIZED PREFERENCES

CHECK FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A PREFERENCE?

YES

NO

NO CHANGE

UNDESIRED HUMAN EFFORT

IS THE SOLUTION SPECIFICATION FUNCTIONAL ONLY?

IS THE AESTHETIC DESIGN COMPONENT ALSO A PART OF THE SOLUTION’S FUNCTIONAL DESIGN?

NO GATHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RECOURSE SPACE)

EFFICIENCY INCREASE

COMMUNITY AESTHETIC DESIGN INPUT

YES

OPTIONS

ENGINEERING DESIGN

AUTO W/ HUMAN & SELF-SUSTAINING HUMAN EFFORT INQUIRY

REINSTATE ISSUE

IS THE OBJECT PRODUCABLE VIA FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION?

PEACE CONNECTEDNESS

IS THERE AN OBJECTIVE AND FORMALLY RECOGNIZED THRESHOLD OF RISK MET?

OUTPUT

AUTOMATION STRATEGY / MAINTENANCE PREVENTION

APPLY DESIGN AUTOMATION

MAINTAIN IN HOLDING PATTERN

WILL FURTHER ACTION AS A REQUIREMENT FOR THIS ISSUE’S RESOLUTION HINDER THE FULFILLMENT OF AT LEAST ONE OF THE COMMUNITY’S PRIMARY GOALS OR ITS PURPOSE?

THE SOLUTION SPECIFICATION

IS A SENSE OF WELLBIENG EVOKED?

ASK

ASK ASK

LOVE

SOLUTION DESIGNEE ARRIVES AT A PREFERENCE DECISION

DOES SEPARATION EXIST IN CONCERN TO THE MATERIAL QUALITY OF ECONOMIC OUTPUT INSTANCES TO DEMAND INSTANCES? YES

SOLUTION NOT FEASIBLE

RESOURCE INQUIRY QUALIFICATION: TECHNOLOGIES THAT POSE A RISK TO HUMAN LIFE ARE ACCESSIBLE AFTER ‘ACCESS QUALIFICATION TRAINING’

NO

ARE THERE SUFFICIENT INSTANCES OF THE ECONOMIC OUTPUT FOR EVERYONE WHO WANTS ACCESS TO THEM SIMULTANEOUSLY?

YES

YES

NO IS SCHEDULING A POSSIBLE SOLUTION?

AUTOMATABILITY NO REDESIGN; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION REQUIRED

DOES SEPARATION EXIST BETWEEN WHAT ANY TWO INDIVIDUALS CAN ACCESS?

NO

EQUITABLY FEASIBLE SOLUTION (ACCESS EQUALITY ACHIEVED)

NO

SOLUTION NOT FEASIBLE & ORIENTS AGAINST JUSTICE

YES IS A RANDOM DRAW A POSSIBLE SOLUTION. THIS ONLY APPLIES TO AD HOC AND CYCLIC STRUCTURES (E.G., TO A SPORTS GAME AT ANOTHER CITY IN THE COMMUNITY)

REDESIGN REQUIRED

WHAT ARE THE RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH PREFERENCE?

THEN IT IS NOT AN AVAILABLE PREFERENCE