11/04/2011
UCD Practice in SMEs An explorative study in Flanders Jeroen Vanattenhoven* Vanattenhoven*, Andrea Wilkinson**, Wilkinson** David Geerts* * Centre for User Experience Research, IBBT / K.U.Leuven, Belgium ** Media, Arts & Design Faculty, KHLIM, Belgium
1st European Workshop on HCI Design and Evaluation: The influence of domains. Limassol, Cyprus, 8th April 2011
Usewell project goal Stimulate Human-Centered Design in Flanders Target = SMEs (without HCD experience) Develop D l a Roadmap/Toolkit R d /T lkit ffor SME SMEs » http://www.ideo.com/work/method-cards » http://www.servicedesigntools.org/ » http://uxbasis.hellogroup.com/
1
11/04/2011
Participating organizations 2 IT companies sometimes applying HCD 2 HCD consultancy firms 1 Innovation I ti R&D Department D t t iin a larger l organization Use their experiences to design a roadmap/toolkit for SMEs without HCD experience in Flanders
Methodology: Process mapping Stimulate discussion about a recently completed project
Some examples of the method in use: » http://www.interface-our-space.be/mapping-reports
2
11/04/2011
Methodology: Process mapping Layers of transparent sheets
Methodology: Process mapping Icons
Problem
Opportunity
Method
Person
People
Documentation
Change of Role
Phase and duration
Tools
Achievement
Lock
Bomb
3
11/04/2011
Results
Results: uncertainty “Business is different than research: a lot is at stake” “Flexibility is really important” “The “Th clients li t didn’t did ’t wantt to t tell t ll us their th i budget” b d t” “Real process is messy, not always that clear/clean” Conclusions » Prepare client that they will have to deviate from workplan · Don’t provide too much information about the process
» Client should be closely involved throughout process » Workplan for the client, different than workplan used
4
11/04/2011
Results: Communication “Presentation should be customized to the client” “Half of the work is analysis, other half is communicating your work” work “Present information back to client via workshops (visually)” “Establish trust with the client, get to know each other” Conclusions » Visual communication is important » Don’t present conclusions as final » Good relationship with client is more important than ‘being right’
Results: Persuasion “Dare to innovate, leave fixed ideas, big discussions, clash” Have a vision that the customer doesn’t doesn t even have; “Have being able to convince them of your vision (=very hard)” “But difficult to make other people in their organization understand, convince them!” Conclusions » Try T to get people l understand d d the h benefits b fi off UCD » Insist, even if it is not usually done with customers
5
11/04/2011
Results: Involvement “Lot of client contact makes them experience, understand the amount of work that has gone into the design (which might look limited on its own) own)” Co-design involves all stakeholders, which leads to ownership, communication, and persuasion Conclusion » Involvement as a crucial element of HCD work
General conclusion What is important when approaching SMEs with HCD » Managing uncertainty · Budget · Workplan
» Communication · Mainly visual communication · Establishes a good relationship with the client (if done right)
» Persuasion · It is still a challenge to convince people of the value of HCD · Required significant effort
» Involvement · Always beneficial for convincing the client of the approach taken
Include these aspects in HCD roadmap for SMEs
6
11/04/2011
Next steps More thorough analysis of the results » » » »
Transcriptions instead of observer’s notes Discuss more labels Analyze mapping artifacts Triangulate mapping, transcriptions
In the project » Evaluate basic concept for the roadmap with SMEs without UCD experience » Design overallll structure off concept (roadmap) ( d ) » Build + evaluate + communicate
Any questions?
[email protected]
7