DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

VARIANCE REVIEW APPLICATION (Electronic Version Available at: www.casagrandeaz.gov/web/guest/devforms)

1.

PROJECT NAME Site Address Assessor’s Parcel #’s Site Area

2.

Building Size

REQUEST: Variance from Ordinance Section Ordinance Requirement Proposed Request Variance from Ordinance Section Ordinance Requirement Proposed Request

3.

APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name Address Phone

4.

Fax

City Email Address

State

Zip Code

City Email Address

State

Zip Code

PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name Address Phone

Fax

OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Signature of Property Owner STATE OF ARIZONA

Date ) ) ss )

County of

On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereto set my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Applicants may receive clarification regarding the specific steps included in processing this application as well as information regarding any code, regulation or policy relevant to the processing of this application by contacting one of the following Planning staff members: Laura Blakeman – [email protected], 520-421-8630, Ext. 3010 Keith Newman – [email protected], 520-421-8630, Ext. 3018 Jim Gagliardi – [email protected], 520-421-8630, Ext. 3020 Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 1

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Overview A Variance is a request to the Board of Adjustment for an exception to the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance because of special circumstances (i.e., size, shape, topography of lot) when the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other similar properties and to recognize unique characteristics of a business or property and give consideration to exceptional situations in order to eliminate hardships.

Pre-Application Process Prior to the submittal of a Variance Application the applicant is required to hold a Pre-Application meeting with the Planner to review the application submittal requirements, processing step, timelines, and to determine whether the proposed Variance will meet the review criteria as listed in section 17.54.040 of the City Code.

Variance Submittal Package Each application for a Variance shall be accompanied by the following documents that will be reviewed by City Staff and by the Board of Adjustment: a. Project Narrative b. Applicant Variance Justification- The applicant must submit a written statement that justifies how the following three required criteria are met: (1) That there are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the property referred to in the application which does not prevail on other property in that zone; (2) That the strict application of the regulations would work an unnecessary hardship and that the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial existing property rights; (3) That the granting of such application will not materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements of the neighborhood. c. Site Plan: (1) Name of project (2) Vicinity Map (3) North arrow and scale of drawing (4) Existing zoning and proposed use (5) Location and dimensions of existing and proposed property/lot lines (6) Location and width of all public and private roads, driveways and alleys with their names shown (7) Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures labeled as existing or proposed with the current or proposed use noted. Structures include: (8) Buildings (principle & accessory) (9) Fences and walls (10) Dimensions between all existing and proposed structures (11) Distance of all existing and proposed structures from all lot/property lines (12) Total # of existing and proposed parking stalls, and the location of existing and proposed parking areas including drive aisles (if applicable) (13) Location of existing and proposed easements with their width and purpose noted (14) Other information deemed necessary by the Zoning Administrator

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 2

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Public Notice 1) Newspaper Notice- City staff will prepare the Notice of Public Hearing. 2) Sign Posting- The applicant must post a Notice of Public Hearing Sign at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. City Staff will provide the applicant with sign posting instructions 21 days prior to the hearing. Said sign must be removed from the site no later than 10 days after the last applicable public hearing. The City offers a sign removal service for a fee (if desired check the box below). For additional public notice sign posting instructions go to (http://casagrandeaz.gov/dept/planning/planning-division/public-process/) 3) Surrounding Property Owner Notification - City Staff will prepare and mail all required notices to surrounding property owners.

Fees Variance-Owner Occupied Single Family Residential: $250 Variance-Other: $1,000 Technology Recovery Fee: 5% of Review Fee

□ Sign Removal Fee (Optional): $100

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 3

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

REGULATORY BILL OF RIGHTS – REVIEW TIMEFRAMES Completeness & Substantive Review Time Frames1 Substantive Review (SR) Stage3

Administrative Completeness Review (CR)2

2 days

Review of Initial Submittal4 30 days

Staff Decision or Review of Resubmittal5, 6 30 days

Staff Decision based upon 2nd Re-submittal

Over-All Timeframe7

30 days

62 days

1

All times are maximum timeframes in business days (Mon-Fri.; excluding City Holidays). Shorter review times will be accomplished where possible.

2

Completeness Review timeframes are calculated from date of application submittal to date of acceptance or rejection of the application as administratively complete.

3

Substantive Review timeframes are calculated from date of acceptance of application for Substantive Review, or upon receipt of re-submittal of revised plans/reports, to the date of issuance of a comprehensive review letter, or final administrative decision.

4

Review of initial submittal limited to determination of compliance with ordinances, codes, regulations or policy relevant to the specific permit or project application. The review comments on the initial submittal may be amended to address code/policy requirements that City staff failed to include in the 1st comprehensive review document.

5

Issuance of a review letter regarding re-submittal only allowed if applicant consents to extend review timeframe to resolve remaining code/policy compliance issues. Said extension shall not exceed 50% of the over-all timeframe.

6

Review of re-submittal shall be limited to: a) Addressing 1st review comments that the applicant failed to adequately address in their re-submittal; or b) Addressing new review issues arising from modifications the applicant has made to the design and/or technical reports.

7

Over-All Review timeframe is the sum of the Completeness, Initial & Re-submittal Substantive Review timeframes and does not include any time involved in review of the 2nd Re-submittal. An administrative decision will be made on the permit/project application prior to the end of the Over-All Review timeframe unless the applicant and the City agree to review of a 2nd Resubmittal.

In accordance with the Regulatory Bill of Rights (ARS 9-835) the City of Casa Grande will typically make an administrative decision on each permit application after one (1) comprehensive staff review. However, from time to time a 2nd review is necessary to resolve code/policy compliance issues associated with a permit. In accordance with ARS 9-835.I., by mutual agreement, the applicant and the City may engage in a 2nd review of an application as long as said 2nd review does not exceed the over-all time frame by 50%. The specific 1st and 2nd and over-all review timeframes for this application are provided above. Applicants may sign below, consenting to a 2nd review if necessary, within the stated prescribed timeframe. Your consent is not required at time of application submittal. Applicants who do not sign below will be contacted by City staff if a 2nd review is determined to be necessary prior to making an administrative decision on this application. Applications denied after the completion of the review cycle are eligible for re-application to address the code/policy deficiencies which were the basis for the application denial with the payment of a fee equal to 25% of original application fee amount. Said re-application shall occur within 90 days of the application denial. I hereby consent to a 2nd review of my application, if necessary, prior to making a final administrative decision. ___________________________________

Applicant

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 4

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Administrative Completeness Review Process

Application Submittal 1-5 Days

Application deemed to be

Yes

No Applicant notified of application deficiencies and of additional information required

No

Applicant submits additional required information

Applicant notified of completeness; Begin substantive

* All time frames are listed as business

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 5

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Substantive Review Process Begin Substantive Review

Commence public hearing process

Application determined to be in substantial compliance with applicable code/policy requirements?

Yes

No City sends applicant a comprehensive set of review comments indicating areas of code/policy non-compliance and requesting re-submittal that addresses identified deficiencies

Applicant submits revised application/plans/ reports/drawings, etc within 180 days

No

Applicant notified that application classified as withdrawn

Yes

Yes

Application deemed in compliance?

No

Yes

City contacts applicant to determine if they will agree to one additional substantive review No Commence public hearing process

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 6

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Board of Adjustment Public Hearing Process Substantive review complete

Public notice actions

- Applicant posts property - City sends notices - City places ad in newspaper

City writes staff report

Board of Adjustment Public Hearing

Denied

Appeal to Superior Court within 30 days

Approved

No

End of process

Yes Start of Judicial Process

* All times frames are listed as business days.

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 7

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW CHECKLIST 1. Project Narrative 2. Variance Justification Statement 3. Site Plan (Draw to scale (1:20, 1:30, 1:40)  (2 copies – 8 ½ x11; 11x17 or 24 x36 (depending on scale of project) 4. CD containing all Submittal Documents  (1 CD with all documents in PDF format) 5. Application Fees

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

□ □ □ □ □ □

Page 8

DSA-

City of Casa Grande, Planning & Development Dept., 510 E. Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85122

Site Plan Example

Updated 4/4/14

www.casagrandeaz.gov

Page 9

Variance Owner Occupied SFR (BOA).pdf

the following Planning staff members: Laura Blakeman – laurab@casagrandeaz.gov, 520-421-8630, Ext. 3010. Keith Newman – [email protected], ...

230KB Sizes 0 Downloads 144 Views

Recommend Documents

NSP Single Family Housing– Owner Occupied Activities.pdf ...
Page 1 of 5. State of Colorado – Division of Housing – NSP. ICF International SF-1. NSP Single Family Housing– Owner Occupied Activities. Sales price limit.

Black-White Appreciation of Owner-Occupied Homes in ...
Aug 25, 2011 - crime rates and poverty rates are positively correlated, and school test ... Coate and Vanderhoff (1993) using the annual housing survey data did not find ..... Map le wo od an d. M o ntcla ir,. N .J .,. 199. 0. –. 20. 00 and. 197. 0

Tax Treatment of Owner Occupied Housing and Wealth ...
39.2. 40.8. Top 20%. 57.2. 59.9. 54.5. 56.1. Gini. 0.54. 0.57. 0.52. 0.53. Note: The percent of income reported here is normal income reported in the Survey of ...

The Estimation of Owner Occupied Housing Indexes ...
May 3, 2012. Abstract ... housing rents are a joint between assets and goods/services prices. In order to understand why ...... We define south-facing dummy, SD, to indicate whether the house's windows are .... TT: Travel time to terminal station (mi

Tax treatment of owner occupied housing and wealth ...
Since the favorable tax treatment of housing disproportionately creates tax savings for the upper quantiles ... journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmacro ...

Tax Treatment of Owner Occupied Housing and Wealth ...
Jun 21, 2009 - tax treatment of housing will disproportionately create tax savings for the ... interest deductibility reduces the Gini coefficient on wealth and ..... (2006), we assume that the utility derived from housing is higher for a ..... In th

Tax Treatment of Owner Occupied Housing and Wealth ...
Jun 21, 2009 - 39.2. 40.8. Top 20%. 57.2. 59.9. 54.5. 56.1. Gini. 0.54. 0.57. 0.52. 0.53. Note: The percent of income reported here is normal income reported in ...

SFR template National Statistics 240815 - Gov.uk
Mar 24, 2016 - 52%. Proportion achieving 5 or more A*-C GCSEs or equivalent, including English and mathematics increases… 14% of looked after children achieved 5 or more A*-. C GCSEs or equivalent, including English and mathematics. This is an incr

occupied with ghosts.pdf
Sign in. Loading… Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying.

velocity variance
Dec 2, 1986 - compute both the friction velocity and surface heat flux from the surface-layer wind. profiles alone, using the method suggested by Klug (1967). For the convective AB L, the surface heat flux can also be computed from just the surfac

CR AE SFR 2016 03FEB16.pdf
Page 3 of 19. RIGHTS TO FAI INTERNATIONAL SPORTING EVENTS. All international sporting events organised wholly or partly under the rules of the ...

MULTISCALE VARIANCE-STABILIZING TRANSFORM ...
low-pass filtered MPG process. This transform can be con- sidered as a generalization of the GAT and a recently pro- posed VST for Poisson data [2]. Then, this ...

VARIANCE REGULARIZATION OF RNNLM FOR ...
algorithm for RNNLMs to address this problem. All the softmax-normalizing factors in ..... http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/ imikolov/rnnlm/thesis.pdf. [3] Holger Schwenk and ...

Plumbing Variance Request Form.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Plumbing ...

Charter Variance for 2018.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Charter Variance for 2018.pdf. Charter Variance for 2018.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.

neural networks and the bias variance dilemma.pdf
can be learned? ' Nonparametric inference has matured in the past 10 years. There ... Also in Section 4, we will briefly discuss the technical issue of consistency, which .... m classes, 3 e {1,2.....rr1}, and an input, or feature, vector x. Based o

A Nonparametric Variance Decomposition Using Panel Data
Oct 20, 2014 - In Austrian data, we find evidence that heterogeneity ...... analytical standard errors for our estimates without imposing functional forms on Fi, we.

Electrical Variance Request Form.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Electrical ...

ACCOUNTING FOR HETEROGENEOUS VARIANCE ...
Ireland,. 4. Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Highfield House, Shinagh, Bandon, Co. Cork, Ireland. INTRODUCTION. Irish beef evaluations for beef traits comprise many breeds and their crosses and incorporates thirteen traits recorded on subsets of th

Asymptotic Variance Approximations for Invariant ...
Given the complexity of the economic and financial systems, it seems natural to view all economic models only as ...... To summarize, accounting for model misspecification often makes a qualitative difference in determining whether ... All these size

MULTISCALE VARIANCE-STABILIZING TRANSFORM ...
PROCESSES AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN BIOIMAGING. B. Zhanga ... transform (GAT) [1], to Gaussianize the data so that each sample is ... posed VST for Poisson data [2]. Then, this ... To simplify the following analysis we assume that λi = λ.