POLYVICTIMIZATION IN LATER LIFE Shelly L. Jackson, Ph.D. Financial Fraud and Abuse Visiting Fellow Office for Victims of Crime

THE NEW PUZZLE

Financial Exploitation             

Sense of urgency High profile cases State definitions Statutory changes Identified types of FE Survey of APS caseworkers Profiles? Risk factors Internet resources Prosecution Financial institutions MDTs Prevention LTC facilities

Polyvictimization

DEFINITION HAMBY & GRYCH (2013)





Victim 

Co-occurring forms of abuse in later life



Revictimization in later life



Life-long revictimization



Cascading (serial forms of abuse)

Offender 

Same offender or different offenders

TYPES OF ELDER ABUSE 





Distinguish different types of abuse Polyvictimization is different from forms of abuse occurring in isolation Linkages between forms of abuse

CO-OCCURRING…

WHAT ARE THE MOST FREQUENTLY COOCCURRING FORMS OF ELDER ABUSE?

 We

don’t know

PREVALENCE 

10% to 50% experience two or more forms of abuse



Rates may differ by the type of abuse involved



Gender results are mixed





Decreasing prevalence with increasing number of co-occurring abuse Higher rates in clinical samples of 30% to 40%

NAVARRO ET AL. 2010 

46% involve one type of abuse

9% Physical & financial  22.9% Neglect & financial  13.9% self-neglect & financial 

TIP OF THE ICEBERG

DIFFERENTIATING VICTIMS Financial Exploitation     

   

No children Live alone No childhood family violence Not aggressive toward abuser Not poor relationship with abuser Younger age No communication deficits No dependence on others No confusion/dementia

Hybrid Financial Exploitation        

Widowed Cohabitation with abuser Not good/fair health Unable to drive Fear abuser History of childhood family violence Perceive abuser as caretaker Long history of abuse

DIFFERENTIATING OFFENDERS Financial Exploitation

Non-relative  Have children  No IPV (p < .07)  Know elder short time  No overburdened social support 

Hybrid Financial Exploitation

Relative  Unemployed  Unable to drive  Financially dependent  Known elder a long time  Parasitic abuser 

INTERPERSONAL DYNAMICS 

Dynamics are different for victims of polyvictimization Closer relationship (parent-child)  Long-term relationship  Long-standing abusive situation 

AND NOW…

MORE SERIOUS OUTCOMES 

Guardianship



Change of living arrangement



Longer length of abuse



Risk of re-abuse/re-report to APS

ACTUARIAL RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT (NCCD, 2013)



If multiple types of abuse, 20% increase in revictimization.

:

INCREASED THE ODDS OF SUBMISSION TO THE

DA BY 2X

INCREASED THE ODDS OF CHARGES BEING FILED BY A FACTOR OF TWO; INCREASED THE ODDS OF A PLEA OR CONVICTION BY A FACTOR OF THREE.

FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION CO-OCCURRING WITH PHYSICAL ABUSE

(NAVARRO ET AL. 2012)



Increased the odds of submission to the DA by 2x



Increased the odds of charges being filed by 2x



Increased the odds of a plea or conviction by 3x

THEORY 

Accumulating Risk Theory 

The higher the number of risk factors, the worse the outcomes

TRAUMA THEORY

IMPACT OF TRAUMA

THE IMPACT OF TRAUMA 

Reluctance to accept services may be due to trauma so knowing someone is a polyvictim may open the door for services.

TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE



What’s wrong with you

What has happened to you?



Neither sick nor bad, but injured

LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES (P

OST ET AL.,

2010)



Polyvictimization occurs in LTC facilities



15% experienced 2+ forms simultaneously



If financially exploited, their risk for physical & emotional abuse, and neglect increase

NEEDS ASSESSMENT 

51 VOCA Administrators 

Financial fraud (8.3% consumer fraud)



Financial exploitation (5.3% by family)



Elder Abuse (11%)



Polyvictimization (5% - 50%)

NEEDS ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS 

Polyvictimization – “Never heard of it” 





General recognition

Polyvictimization was subsumed under elder abuse Only two states specifically respond to polyvictimization with targeted programming

YOUR PRACTICE

PRESENTING PROBLEMS Human service agencies tend to address the presenting problem without digging deeper to determine whether there is co-occurring abuse (Hamby& Grych, 2013).

SCREEN FOR MULTIPLE FORMS OF ABUSE

A mother and father have been willingly financially supporting their adult children for years by paying for their houses and cars. However, as the couple aged, their needs increased substantially. Rather than deny their children financial assistance, they decide to not fill a prescription or fail to attend a doctor’s appointment and end up in the emergency room. The hospital calls adult protective services reporting self-neglect because the older adults are not taking their medications. Adult protective services learn the couple has an insufficient amount of money because they are supporting their adult children to their own detriment. While the couple was able to financially support their adult children for many years, the elderly person’s financial needs are increasing. Either the adult children are not responding with the help the couple needs or they continue to take their parents’ money even though the parents need the money for their own health care. Either way, the situation is untenable. However, without screening for other forms of abuse, this could have remained a self-neglect case with the possibility of an inappropriate or ineffective intervention.

POLYVICTIMIZATON IS A

PROCESS, NOT AN EVENT ~

RECOVERY WILL BE A PROCESS

REFUSAL OF SERVICES

If client refuses investigation/services, 11.9% increase in subsequent report 

16% increase in another self-report 

(NCCD, 2013)

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS 

Complexity of Polyvictimization 

Requires more time



Requires multiple services/interventions



Uses every skill of an APS caseworker



Repeat cases



Requires additional staff

ENGAGEMENT 

It may take more than one visit



Understand reason for refusal



Address their fears



Never denigrate the offender



Offer services for abusers

MULTIPLE NEEDS 



Of victims who access victims services, most have multiple needs (Burt, Zweig, Schlichter, & Andrews, 2000) On average, victims need between four and six service domains (Newmark, Bondman, Smith & Liner, 2003)

VICTIM SERVICES 

Emotional support/listening



Safety services



Professional therapy



Criminal justice advocacy



Personal advocacy/service planning



Civil legal assistance

VICTIM SERVICES PROVIDERS 

Community-Based      



Family and caregiver support services Financial services Areas on Aging Legal Services Domestic violence programs Mental health services

System-Based APS  LTC ombudsmen  Law enforcement/Victim Assistance  Medicaid Fraud Control Unites 

APS AS SERVICE PROVIDERS 

Few victim assistance programs target older victims for outreach (Gregorie, ) so older adults are unaware of available services and few services are available if elder abuse is identified (Macolini, 1995).

INTERVENING IN POLYVICTIMIZATION 

Tough Love Financial fiduciary  Limit setting  Counseling 

MULTIDISCIPLINARY 

Communication and collaboration between disciplines is important

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS 

    

 

Geriatricians Sexual assault nurse examiners Neuropsychologists/clinical psychologists Law enforcement Mental health practitioners Civil attorneys and/or bar members specializing in family and elder law or legal aid Adult Protective Services (APS) Long-term care ombudsman program





   

 

   

Domestic violence advocates Sexual assault advocates

Regulatory agencies Guardianship programs Aging services organizations Faith communities Financial institutions Meals on Wheels (community serving agencies with access to isolated elderly persons) Consumer protection agencies Hospital discharge planner Probation and parole (Community corrections) Emergency Medical Treatment (EMT)

DOES THIS RESONATE WITH YOUR EXPERIENCE? DOES POLYVICTIMIZATION MATTER IN YOUR PRACTICE? HOW DO YOU RESPOND DIFFERENTLY? WHAT ARE POSSIBLE RESPONSES? WHAT OTHER TOOLS DO YOU NEED TO EFFECTIVE RESPOND?

POLYVICTIMIZATION AND PRACTICE 

Ask better questions 



Bring in other parties to support the victim 



Screening

MDT

Identify needed systems changes 

Longer time to investigate cases

PRACTICE 

Expand reporting and intake forms to identify all forms of elder abuse suffered by a victim



Expand investigations to assess for polyvictimization



Provide polyvictimizaiton training to others







Incorporate victim-centered and trauma informed approaches Evaluate agency policies and practices to assure they address polyvictimization

Assure that agency practices are culturally competent.

WITHOUT KNOWING ABOUT POLYVICTIMIZATION, THE INTERVENTION COULD BE INAPPROPRIATE OR COUNTERPRODUCTIVE

VCPEA Conference Breakout IID 2014 Polyvictimization-Jackson.pdf

Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. VCPEA Conference Breakout IID 2014 Polyvictimization-Jackson.pdf. VCPEA Conference Breakout IID 2014 Polyvictimization-Jackson.pdf. Open. Extract.

2MB Sizes 2 Downloads 297 Views

Recommend Documents

No documents