2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

Texas Education Agency 2014-15 Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools Campus Name: GOLIAD H S Campus ID: 088902001 District Name: GOLIAD ISD Part I: Student Achievement by Proficiency Level This section provides the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) performance results for each subject area and grade level tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results include all students tested, whether or not they were in the accountability subset.

Two or African American Pacific More Special Econ StateDistrictCampusAmericanHispanicWhite Indian AsianIslanderRaces Ed DisadvELLFemaleMaleMigrant STAAR Percent at Phase-in 1 Level II or Above End of Course English I 2015 66% 71% 71% * 63% 77% * * 67% * 78% 66% 2014 65% 64% 64% 78% 57% 70% * * 42% 56% * 73% 55% * English II

2015 69% 70% 2014 68% 66%

70% 66%

71% 71%

64% 53%

75% 75%

*

*

-

* *

* *

60% 51%

* *

77% 62% 69% 65%

-

Algebra I

2015 77% 91% 2014 79% 75%

89% 72%

* 78%

86% 63%

93% 80%

*

-

*

* *

67% 50%

83% 64%

* *

92% 86% 79% 64%

*

Biology

2015 88% 85% 2014 88% 94%

85% 93%

* 100%

82% 89%

87% 98%

-

-

*

*

54% 71%

83% 88%

* *

88% 83% 97% 89%

-

U.S. History 2015 88% 89% 2014 92% 92%

89% 92%

88% 100%

78% 81%

97% 98%

*

* *

-

* *

* *

88% 84%

* *

86% 92% 91% 92%

-

All Grades All Subjects 2015 73% 74% 2014 75% 76%

79% 75%

80% 84%

73% 66%

84% 83%

*

* *

*

73% 71% 83% 76% 65% 50% 81% 70%

*

2015 74% 73% 2014 75% 73%

71% 65%

75% 75%

64% 55%

76% 72%

*

*

*

* *

16% 38%

63% 67% 78% 64% 54% * 71% 60%

*

Mathematics2015 73% 76% 2014 76% 79%

89% 72%

* 78%

86% 63%

93% 80%

*

-

*

* *

67% 50%

83% 64%

* *

92% 86% 79% 64%

*

Science

2015 75% 65% 2014 77% 80%

85% 93%

* 100%

82% 89%

87% 98%

-

-

*

*

54% 71%

83% 88%

* *

88% 83% 97% 89%

-

2015 74% 80% 2014 75% 89%

89% 92%

88% 100%

78% 81%

97% 98%

*

* *

-

* *

* *

88% 84%

* *

86% 92% 91% 92%

-

36% 39%

30% 30%

52% 47%

*

* *

*

89% 30%

6% 11%

28% 14% 45% 39% 25% 0% 41% 35%

*

Reading

Social Studies

STAAR Percent at Final Level II or Above All Grades All Subjects 2015 38% 37% 42% 2014 39% 37% 38% Reading

1 of 8

100% 35% 90% 46%

2015 40% 38% 2014 42% 38%

42% 41%

42% 44%

33% 34%

49% 48%

*

*

*

* *

3% 18%

27% 22% 49% 35% 27% * 47% 35%

*

Mathematics2015 36% 37% 2014 37% 37%

29% 21%

* 22%

20% 18%

36% 27%

*

-

*

* *

0% 5%

23% 19%

* *

37% 22% 26% 15%

*

Science

36% 47%

* 57%

21% 36%

50% 57%

-

-

*

*

15% 0%

14% 27%

* *

42% 31% 47% 47%

-

2015 40% 27% 2014 40% 39%

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

Two or African American Pacific More Special Econ StateDistrictCampusAmericanHispanicWhite Indian AsianIslanderRaces Ed DisadvELLFemaleMaleMigrant Social Studies

57% 40%

38% 33%

39% 27%

69% 52%

*

* *

-

* *

* *

52% 32%

* *

STAAR Percent at Level III Advanced All Grades All Subjects 2015 14% 13% 10% 2014 14% 12% 4%

8% 0%

4% 4%

15% 4%

*

* *

*

22% 0%

0% 1%

5% 2%

Reading

2015 41% 47% 2014 38% 42%

45% 67% 32% 48%

-

0% 0%

8% 5%

11% 3%

*

2015 15% 13% 2014 14% 10%

3% 2%

0% 0%

1% 3%

5% 1%

*

*

*

* *

0% 3%

1% 2%

0% *

2% 4%

3% 1%

*

Mathematics2015 14% 15% 2014 15% 15%

10% 2%

* 0%

2% 2%

14% 2%

*

-

*

* *

0% 0%

6% 3%

* *

14% 3%

6% 0%

*

Science

2015 14% 10% 2014 13% 10%

15% 7%

* 0%

7% 9%

23% 8%

-

-

*

*

0% 0%

3% 2%

* *

21% 11% 8% 6%

-

2015 18% 20% 2014 15% 14%

24% 6%

13% 0%

15% 3%

32% 10%

*

* *

-

* *

* *

21% 0%

* *

12% 35% 4% 8%

-

*

100% *

*

100% 100%

98% 97%

99% 97%

93% 100% 100% 100% 99% 97%

*

97% 98%

98% 96%

90% 100%

Social Studies

STAAR Participation (All Grades) All Tests 2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 99% 98% 95% 98% 98% Reading

2015 99% 100% 2014 99% 98%

99% 97%

100% 94%

99% 97%

99% 96%

*

*

*

100% *

99% 96%

*

Mathematics

2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 99% 99% 100% 98% 100%

*

-

*

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 95% 98% * 98% 100%

*

Science

2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 99% 98% 88% 98% 100%

-

-

*

Social Studies

2015 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2014 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%

*

100% *

-

*

99% 98%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% * 100% 96%

-

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * 100% 100% * 100% 100%

-

STAAR Participation Results by Assessment Type for Students Served in Special Education Settings (All Grades) Reading Tests % of Participants % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations % STAAR Alternate2 % of Non-Participants Mathematics Tests % of Participants % STAAR/EOC With No Accommodations % STAAR/EOC With Accommodations % STAAR Alternate2 % of Non-Participants

2015

98%

98%

97%

*

100%

92%

-

-

-

-

97%

94%

-

100%

95%

-

2015

17%

8%

9%

*

0%

8%

-

-

-

-

9%

6%

-

9%

9%

-

2015 2015 2015

71% 10% 2%

87% 3% 2%

85% 3% 3%

* * *

94% 6% 0%

85% 0% 8%

-

-

-

-

85% 3% 3%

81% 6% 6%

-

82% 9% 0%

86% 0% 5%

-

2015

99%

97%

100%

*

*

*

-

-

-

-

100%

*

-

*

100%

-

2015

13%

10%

22%

*

*

*

-

-

-

-

22%

*

-

*

40%

-

2015 2015 2015

74% 11% 1%

84% 3% 3%

78% 0% 0%

* * *

* * *

* * *

-

-

-

-

78% 0% 0%

* * *

-

* * *

60% 0% 0%

-

'?' Indicates that the data for this item were statistically improbable, or were reported outside a reasonable range.

2 of 8

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '-' Indicates zero observations reported for this group. 'n/a' Indicates data reporting is not applicable for this group.

Part II: Student Achievement and State Academic Annual Measureable Objectives (AMOs) This section provides the STAAR performance results for each subject area tested in the 2014-15 school year. These results only include tested students who were in the accountability subset. This section also includes four-year and five-year graduation rates and participation rates on STAAR for reading and mathematics.

Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Current & Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) ELL + Performance Status ‡ Target 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% Reading N N N n/a n/a n/a n/a N N n/a Mathematics Y Y Y n/a n/a n/a n/a Y n/a Participation Status ‡ Target Reading Mathematics

95% Y Y

95%

95% Y Y

95% Y Y

Federal Graduation Status (Target: See Reason Codes) Graduation Target Y Y Y Met Reason Code *** a a a

n/a n/a

n/a n/a

n/a n/a

n/a n/a

95% Y Y

95% Y

95%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Y

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

a

n/a

n/a n/a

District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit Mathematics Alternate 1% Number Proficient Total Federal Cap Limit

'‡' Results for grade 3-8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '+' Participation uses ELL (Current) rate, Graduation uses ELL (Ever HS) rate '***' Federal Graduation Rate Reason Codes: a = Graduation Rate Goal of 90% b = Four-year Graduation Rate Target of 83% c = Safe Harbor Target of a 10% decrease in difference from the prior year rate and the goal d = Five-year Graduation Rate Target of 88% Blank cells above represent student group indicators that do not meet the minimum size criteria. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Current & ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) (Current) Performance Rates ‡

Reading # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

3 of 8

191

**

82

95

-

-

-

*

71

*

6

n/a

266 72%

** 75%

125 66%

124 77%

-

-

-

* *

110 65%

* *

9 67%

8 n/a

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Current & ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed Monitored) (Current) Mathematics # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Writing # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Science # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Social Studies # at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard Total Tests % at Phase-in Satisfactory Standard

83

*

41

36

-

-

-

*

29

6

*

n/a

91 91%

* *

46 89%

38 95%

-

-

-

* *

34 85%

8 75%

* *

* n/a

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

n/a

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

n/a

44

*

**

23

-

-

-

-

23

7

*

n/a

51 86%

* *

** 87%

27 85%

-

-

-

-

26 88%

12 58%

* *

n/a

96

6

32

55

-

*

-

*

29

*

*

n/a

106 91%

7 86%

40 80%

56 98%

-

* *

-

* *

33 88%

* *

* *

* n/a

131 131 100%

131 132 99%

-

-

-

* * *

115 116 99%

32 33 97%

n/a n/a n/a

10 10 100%

50 50 100%

42 42 100%

-

-

-

* * *

35 35 100%

9 9 100%

n/a n/a n/a

* * *

Participation Rates ‡

Reading: 2014-2015 Assessments Number Participating 279 ** Total Students 280 ** Participation Rate 100% 100% Mathematics: 2014-2015 Assessments Number Participating 99 * Total Students 99 * Participation Rate 100% *

'‡' Results for grade 3-8 mathematics, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate 2 are included in 2015 Federal System Safeguards. '*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report. Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Ever ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed HS) (Current) Federal Graduation Rates 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2014 Number Graduated 93 * 44 45 * * 29 9 * n/a Total in Class 96 * 46 45 * * 29 9 * Graduation Rate 96.9% * 95.7% 100.0% * * 100.0% 100.0% * n/a 4-year Longitudinal Cohort Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated 85 * 36 46 * * 24 9 * n/a Total in Class 87 * 37 46 * * 24 10 * * Graduation Rate 97.7% * 97.3% 100.0% * * 100.0% 90.0% * n/a 5-year Extended Graduation Rate (Gr 9-12): Class of 2013 Number Graduated 85 * 36 46 * * 24 9 * n/a Total in Class 87 * 37 46 * * 24 10 * * Graduation Rate 97.7% * 97.3% 100.0% * * 100.0% 90.0% * n/a District: Met Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments Reading Number Proficient n/a

4 of 8

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

Two or ELL All African American Pacific More Econ Special (Ever ELL Students American Hispanic White Indian Asian Islander Races Disadv Ed HS) (Current) Total Federal Cap n/a Limit Mathematics Number Proficient n/a Total Federal Cap n/a Limit

'*' Indicates results are masked due to small numbers to protect student confidentiality. '**' When only one racial/ethnic group is masked, then the second smallest racial/ethnic group is masked (regardless of size). '-' Indicates there are no students in the group. 'n/a' Indicates data are not applicable to this report.

Source: 2015 Accountability Federal System Safeguards Report

Part III: Priority and Focus Schools Priority schools are the lowest 5% of Title I served campuses based on performance in reading, mathematics and graduation rates. Priority schools include Tier I or Tier II TTIPS schools, campuses with graduation rates less than 60%, and lowest achieving campuses based on All Students reading/math performance.Focus schools are 10% of Title I served campuses, not already identified as priority schools, that have the widest gaps between student group performance and safeguard targets. Campuses are ranked based on the largest gaps between student group reading/math performance and the annual measurable objectives (AMO) target of 75%.

Priority School Identification: Priority School Reason: N/A No Focus School Reason: N/A Focus School Identification: No A high-performance reward school is identified as a Title I school with distinctions based on reading and math performance. In addition, at the high school level, a reward school is a Title I school with the highest graduation rates. A high progress school is identified as a Title I school in the top 25% in annual improvement; and/or a school in the top 25% of those demonstrating ability to close performance gaps based on system safeguards.

High Performing School: No High Progress School: No

Source: TEA Division of School Improvement and Support

Part IV: Teacher Quality Data Part IV A: Percent of Teachers by Highest Degree Held Professional qualifications of all public elementary and secondary school teachers in the State of Texas. The distribution of degrees attained by teachers are shown as the percent of total Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) count of teachers with no degree, bachelor’s, master’s, and doctorate degrees.

----------------- Campus ----------------Number Percent No Degree

5 of 8

0.3

0.8%

District Percent 1.2%

State Percent 0.9%

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

----------------- Campus ----------------Number Percent Bachelors Masters Doctorate

32.7 4.7 0.9

District Percent 82.1% 15.8% 0.9%

84.5% 12.3% 2.4%

State Percent 75.1% 23.4% 0.6%

Part IV B and C: Teachers with Emergency/Provisional Credentials, Highly Qualified (HQ) Teachers Low Poverty/ High Poverty Summary Reports The percentage of all public elementary and secondary school teachers teaching with emergency or provisional credentials, and the percentage of classes in the state not taught by highly qualified teachers disaggregated by high-poverty compared to low-poverty schools. For this purpose, high-poverty means schools in the top quartile of poverty and low-poverty means the bottom quartile of poverty in the state.

Core Academic Subject Areas

Total Number of Teachers Total Number of Classes Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers

Number Percent Number Percent

General Education

Special Education

Total

26 179 179 100.00% 0 0.00%

3 1 1 100.00% 0 0.00%

29 180 180 100.00% 0 0.00%

Number of Core Academic Teachers Who Are Teaching on the Following Permits

Emergency (for certified personnel) Emergency (for uncertified personnel) Non-renewable Temporary Classroom Assignment District Teaching Temporary

------------ Number of Teachers -----------Elem secondary (PK-6) (7-12) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of Core Academic Teachers with a Probationary Certificate Enrolled in an Alternative Certification

Highly Qualified Not Highly Qualified

------------ Number of Teachers -----------General Education Special Education 0 0 0 0

Source: TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

Part V: Graduates Enrolled in Texas Institution of Higher Education (IHE)

6 of 8

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

This section provides the percentage of students who enroll and begin instruction at an institution of higher education in the school year (fall or spring semester) following high school graduation. The rate reflects the percent of total graduates during the 2011-12 school year who attended a public or independent college or university in Texas in the 2012-13 academic year.

Year Enrolled in Higher Education 2012-13 2011-12

Campus 72.7% 56.0%

District 72.7% 56.0%

State 56.9% 57.3%

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Part VI: Statewide National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Results The most recent NAEP results for Texas are provided showing statewide reading and mathematics performance results and participation rates, disaggregated by student group.

State Level: 2015 Percentages at NAEP Achievement Levels

Grade Grade 4

Grade 8

7 of 8

% At or Above Basic 64 n/a 87 51 56 82 29 41 54

% At or Above Proficient 31 n/a 66 17 22 50 11 12 20

% At or Above Advanced 7 n/a 30 2 3 13 2 2 3

Subject Reading

Student Group Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program

% Below Basic 36 n/a 13 49 44 18 71 59 46

Mathematics

Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program

14 n/a 3 24 16 7 41 23 19

86 n/a 97 76 84 93 59 77 81

44 n/a 82 29 37 60 18 28 30

8 n/a 36 2 4 15 2 2 2

Reading

Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program

28 n/a 12 38 35 14 70 71 36

72 n/a 88 62 65 86 30 29 64

28 n/a 55 19 19 43 5 2 18

2 n/a 12 2 1 4 n/a n/a 1

Mathematics

Overall American Indian Asian Black Hispanic White Students with Disabilities English Language Learners National School Lunch Program

25 n/a 5 43 31 12 62 60 34

75 n/a 95 57 69 88 38 40 66

32 n/a 67 16 23 48 8 6 20

7 n/a 25 2 4 12 1 n/a 3

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Card

Grade

https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&ye...

Subject

Student Group

% Below Basic

% At or Above Basic

% At or Above Proficient

% At or Above Advanced

State Level: 2015 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Grade Grade 4

Grade 8

Subject Reading

Student Group Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient

% 72 92

Mathematics

Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient

80 95

Reading

Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient

81 95

Mathematics

Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient

81 90

Source: TEA Division of Student Assessment

8 of 8

2/2/16, 1:13 PM

2014-15 Federal Report Cardh.pdf

Page 3 of 8. 2014-15 Federal Report Cardh.pdf. 2014-15 Federal Report Cardh.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying 2014-15 Federal ...

200KB Sizes 2 Downloads 169 Views

Recommend Documents

2015-16 Federal Report Card.pdf
2015-16 Federal Report Card.pdf. 2015-16 Federal Report Card.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying 2015-16 Federal Report Card.pdf ...

g.recruitment.201415.Scout.pdf
Page 2 of 2. g.recruitment.201415.Scout.pdf. g.recruitment.201415.Scout.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying g.recruitment.201415.

EPA-402R-10003 FEDERAL GUIDANCE REPORT ... -
equal to that from natural background radiation, with medical x-rays accounting for the majority. 83. (NCRP 2009). .... Federal facilities should evaluate each imaging system's performance to optimize dose, and. 191 maintain this ..... CT scanners, m

2014-15 HS Federal Report Card.pdf
Science 2015 40% 39% 44% * 38% 54% * * * 12% 35% * 46% 42%. 2014 40% 30% 31% * 21% 50% 33% * 8% 28% 11% 23% 39% *. Social Studies 2015 ...

EPA-402R-10003 FEDERAL GUIDANCE REPORT ... -
equal to that from natural background radiation, with medical x-rays accounting for the majority. 83. (NCRP 2009). 84. 85 .... in their information reporting systems and databases. 215. 10. Agencies ...... dose concerns, the time course of tissue rec

2016 Annual Report and Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics
19,787. 10,982. 55.5. 4,094. 20.7. 4,711. 23.8. Powder Cocaine. 3,891. 1,570. 40.3. 935. 24.0. 1,386. 35.6. Crack Cocaine. 1,582. 860. 54.4. 441. 27.9. 281. 17.8.

Federal Post-Disaster Recovery: A Review of Federal Programs
Overall Federal Role, Approach, and Programs in Post-Disaster Recovery. General Assessment ..... states and locals to bring in an accounting firm). .... Many small businesses suffer from the lack of access to immediate emergency capital. The.

FEDERAL-OR.pdf
Sentences-Punishment, Excessive Fines Clause. 4. Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 5. Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968. 6. Violence Against ...

FEDERAL-OR.pdf
Eighth Amendment violations of the United States Constitution: Excessive Prison. Sentences-Punishment, Excessive Fines Clause. 4. Due Process Clause of the ...

report
Mar 7, 2016 - a cluttered bin, can be performed with hardly any advance planning, relying instead ... attempt, and a large-scale data collection framework for.

report
Mar 7, 2016 - objects by embedding the finger into the center of the ob- ject, while harder objects were .... national Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1316–1322, 2015. ... Contact Wrench Space Metrics. In IEEE International.

federal-complaint-procedure.pdf
The complainant has the right to appeal the decision of Bristow Public Schools to the General Counsel of the State. Department of Education, Oklahoma City, ...

Swiss Federal Council.pdf
Sign in. Loading… Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying.

DEL_Escambia Federal PT.pdf
Mr. Malcolm Thomas, Superintendent. Escambia County District School Board. 75 N. Pace Boulevard. Pensacola, FL 32505. Dear Superintendent: Enclosed is a ...

public notice - Federal Communications Commission
Jun 8, 2016 - category two requests for E-rate supported services for funding year ... there is sufficient funding to fully fund all category one and category two.

Federal Spending Decreases.pdf
travel costs by increasing reliance on video teleconferencing when practical. To fund the upfront. capital costs associated with this effort, DOE will plan to reduce ...