The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS
COMMITTEE OPINION SUMMARY Number 648 • December 2015
(Replaces Committee Opinion Number 399, February 2008)
For a comprehensive overview of these recommendations, the fulltext version of this Committee Opinion is available at http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001212.
Scan this QR code with your smart phone to view the full-text version of this Committee Opinon.
Committee on Genetics Committee on Obstetric Practice This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.
Umbilical Cord Blood Banking ABSTRACT: Once considered a waste product that was discarded with the placenta, umbilical cord blood is now known to contain potentially life-saving hematopoietic stem cells. When used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, umbilical cord blood offers several distinct advantages over bone marrow or peripheral stem cells. However, umbilical cord blood collection is not part of routine obstetric care and is not medically indicated. Umbilical cord blood collection should not compromise obstetric or neonatal care or alter routine practice for the timing of umbilical cord clamping. If a patient requests information on umbilical cord blood banking, balanced and accurate information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of public and private umbilical cord blood banking should be provided. The routine storage of umbilical cord blood as “biologic insurance” against future disease is not recommended.
Recommendations The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists makes the following recommendations regarding umbilical cord blood banking: • Umbilical cord blood collection should not compromise obstetric or neonatal care or alter routine practice for the timing of umbilical cord clamping. • If a patient requests information on umbilical cord blood banking, balanced and accurate information regarding the advantages and disadvantages of public and private umbilical cord blood banking should be provided. • The current indications for cord blood transplant are limited to select genetic, hematologic, and malignant disorders. • Patients should be aware that in certain instances, use of one’s own stem cells is contraindicated. Most conditions potentially treated by a patient’s own umbilical cord blood already exist in his or her own
VOL. 126, NO. 6, DECEMBER 2015
•
• •
•
cells and, therefore, the stored blood cannot be used to treat the same individual. Counseling should include disclosure that the chance a child or family member develops a condition that could be treated with an autologous transfusion of umbilical blood is rare. The routine storage of umbilical cord blood as “biologic insurance” against future disease is not recommended. Directed cord blood banking is available through private and public umbilical cord blood banks for any pregnant patient who has a family member with a disease potentially treated by hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Some states have passed legislation requiring physicians to inform their patients about umbilical cord blood banking options. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other obstetric care providers should consult their state medical associations for more information regarding state laws.
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Copyright ª by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
1323
• As a variety of circumstances may arise during the process of labor and delivery that may preclude adequate collection, it is important to obtain welldocumented informed consent that various medical circumstances of the mother or the neonate may prevent umbilical cord blood collection. • Physicians or other professionals who recruit pregnant women and their families for for-profit umbilical cord blood banking should disclose any financial interests or other potential conflicts of interest.
1324
Committee Opinion No. 648 Summary
Copyright December 2015 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 409 12th Street, SW, PO Box 96920, Washington, DC 20090-6920. All rights reserved. Official Citation Umbilical cord blood banking. Committee Opinion No. 648. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:e127–29.
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Copyright ª by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
and other obstetric care providers should consult. their state ... phone to view the ... ACOG.pdf. A6 Diciembre 2015. ACOG.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. A2 Diciembre ...
panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert. panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions ...
Nov 4, 2015 - We assessed pri- mary outcome in subgroup analysis according to the. definition of IUGR used in the original trials. Statistical analysis. Data ...
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Page 3 of 9. A5 Diciembre 2015.pdf. A5 Diciembre 2015.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.
... las mismas conclusiones aunque, para ellos, forma parte del proceso. natural de envejecimiento, la crisis de la mediana edad o una crisis profesional. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem loading
contrast, postmenopausal women with. abnormal bleeding had a very high rate. (13.3%) of unanticipated endometrial. pathology despite negative preoperative.
del Consejo Nacional de Acreditación â CNA, revoque la acreditación que mediante este acto se reconoce. ARTÃCULO SEGUNDO.- La acreditación de alta calidad que mediante este acto se autoriza, deberá. registrarse en el Sistema Nacional de Inform
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. BALANCE ...
There was a problem loading this page. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... A6 Octubre.pdf. A6 Octubre.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.
Currently, mid-trimester CL assessment by trans- vaginal ultrasound is the best clinical predictor of sponta- neous PTB.4 Depending on the population studied ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. A6 Julio.pdf.
Data regarding real-world implementation of CL. screening programs are evolving.28-30 Ozechowski and. colleagues published their experience with universal ...
Page 1 of 5. Management of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. ABSTRACT: Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is an increasingly common problem, particularly ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. A6 - Busatta.pdf.
Jul 10, 2016 - compared by McNemar's test45. All statistical analysis. was performed using SAS statistical software version 9.3. (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, ...
Page 1. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... ICC Diciembre 2017_Castaneda (1).pdf. ICC Diciembre 2017_Castaneda (1).pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Di
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Manual audi a6 ...
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. A6 BBQ Meet_ÐÐ.pdf. A6 BBQ Meet_ÐÐ.p