Dr Roelof Botha
SA drone industry Economic Impact Assessment
Dr Roelof Botha
Characteristics of the South African business environment in mid-2017 (selection) Low levels of business & consumer confidence
Below-optimal economic growth (0.3% in 2016) Rising unemployment Government revenue sources under pressure High levels of violent socio-political unrest Imports from China placing pressure on the balance of payments
Energy policy fiasco & signs of state capture Wide-ranging infrastructure deficiencies
Socio-economic disadvantages of an excessively regulated business environment Barriers to entry into the relevant industry
Reduces the level of domestic competition in the economy Acts as a disincentive for foreign direct investment Reduces a country’s international competitiveness Lowers total output in the economy (GDP) Reduces the rate of employment creation
Loss of a variety of taxation revenues for government Negative impact on technology transfer & national development goals
The Zuma era’s dismal scorecard for SA’s global competitiveness (for public sector corporate governance)
Indicator
(Source: WEF - 2016)
2009
2016
Decline
Govt. procurement - hi-tech products
34
99
-65
Favouritism by govt. officials
50
115
-65
Wastefulness of govt. spending
29
88
-59
Public trust in politicians
50
109
-59
Diversion of public funds
49
96
-47
Quality of primary education
104
126
-22
Government debt
54
73
-19
Pay & productivity
81
98
-17
Cooperation between labour & employers
123
138
-15
Burden of govt. regulation
95
116
-11
GDP growth remains on a downward trajectory (Source: Stats SA)
Year-on-year %
4.5
3
1.5
-1.5
-3
3 Q 1' 17
3 Q 1' 16
3 Q 1' 15
3 Q 1' 14
3 Q 1' 13
3 Q 1' 12
3 Q 1' 11
3 Q 1' 10
3 Q 1' 09
Q 1' 08
0
Global rankings for the quality of air transport infrastructure – selected countries & BRICS (Source: WEF) South Africa (11) Portugal (20) Australia (29) South Korea (31) Greece (40) China (58) India (71) Russia (79) Argentina (91)
Score
Brazil (113)
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Key sectors for the application of UAS services (selection) Agriculture
Filming
Real estate
Private security
Purchases of homes
Public safety
Home rentals
National defence systems
Property development
Road & railway inspections
Mining
Water reservoir inspections
Energy grid
Border control
Industrial infrastructure
Sea rescue operations
Shipping
Emergency medical services
Postage
Fire fighting
Impact of global UAS industry – some facts Number of UAS (for leisure) in the EU in 2025 (est.)
7 million
Number of UAS (for leisure) in the US in 2021 (est.)
3.5 million
Number of UAS (commercial) in the EU in 2025 (est.)
400,000
Number of UAS (commercial) in the US in 2021 (est.)
1 million
Drones being registered in the US per month
Value of European demand for UAS services (p.a.) Timing of launch of one-ton capacity drone (in China) Cost saving on delivering by drone in rural China (vs. truck)
50,000
Euro 10 bn 2 years 70%
Est. job creation upon full UAS integration in US (in 10 years)
100,000
Est. Drone industry contribution to US GDP until 2025
$82 bn
Methodology for determining the economic impact of the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Industry Step
Method
1
Sample survey conducted amongst members of CUAASA
2
Extrapolation of results into total estimated turnover
3
Determination of average multiplier effects for relevant sectors
4
Classification of multiplier effects into direct, indirect & induced
5
Calculation of impact on output, jobs & tax revenues
6
Comparison of results with SA/EU and SA/US GDP ratios
Sources
(i) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)
CUAASA Quantec Data Stats SA Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International Single European Sky ATM Research/EU
Anticipated % increase in key UAS indicators 2017 to 2018
290 %
260 230 200 170 140 110 80 50 Value equip.
UAS (numbers)
Employment
Turnover
Value aircraft
Summary of macro-economic impact of the South African drone industry in 2017 Economic output
R million
Industry turnover
2 052
Total SA output
6 497
Broadening of tax base
R million
Personal income tax
725
Corporate tax
699
Indirect taxes
1 177
Employment creation
Number
Formal employment
24 667
Informal employment
9 763
Composition of the economic impact of the UAS industry (Rm) Total output: R6.5b Total taxes: R2.6b
Industry sales: 2,051
Personal income tax: 725
Corporate tax: 699
Indirect output other sectors: 1,058 Indirect taxes: 1,177
Direct output other sectors: 836
Industry salaries: 1,239
Industry value added: 1,314
Comparison of Economic Impact of the UAS industry with past six AAD Exhibitions (Sources: AAD Organisers’ Office; Botha RF)
6000
R million
5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 AAD 2006
AAD 2008
AAD 2010
AAD 2012
AAD 2014
AAD 2016
UAS
10-year GDP impact of UAS industry in SA based on different scenarios 30 R billion
25
20
15
10
5 25% growth p.a.
30% growth p.a.
SA/US GDP ratio
35% growth p.a.
SA/EU GDP ratio
Macroeconomic advantages of the expansion of the UAS industry Higher level of efficiency due to automation Higher level of customer satisfaction Cost savings to a wide range of businesses Shareholders receive higher dividends Broadening of the taxation base Positive effect on GDP Diffusion of technological advancement More emphasis on appropriate skills development More accurate data collection Mapping of inaccessible locations
Macroeconomic advantages of the expansion of the UAS industry (continued) Preventative maintenance inspections in energy sector Enabling of precision agriculture Assistance with humanitarian assistance More effective policing via identification of endangered citizens & hazards More effective maritime surveillance Enhanced border security Combating of poaching More accurate topographic surveying More efficient stock-pile management Transfer of real time data from fire & emergency scenes
Some indicators supporting a sovereign credit downgrade
CAASA Aviation Activity Index (CAAI) for South Africa (3-quarter moving average)
160
Index; Q1 2014=100 Note: avg. annual real growth = 6.3 %
150 140 130 120 110 100 90 Q1'14
2
3
4
Q1'15
2
3
4
Q1'16
2
3
4
Q1'17
Quarterly motor trade sales (at current & constant 2017 prices) (Sources: Stats SA; SARB; own calculations) 180
R billion
170 Real
160 150 140 Nominal
130 120
Q 1' 17
3
Q 1' 16
3
Q 1' 15
3
Q 1' 14
3
Q 1' 13
3
Q 1' 12
3
Q 1' 11
110
A “state of capture/incompetence” in SA – some proof
• • • • • • • • • • • •
Sassa grant debacle (Minister found guilty of fraud in 2006) Energy policy fiasco (100% increase in electricity tariffs in 3years) PetroSA loss in 2015 = R14.5 billion (due to incompetence)* SAA loss in 2015 = R5.6 billion* Irregular municipal expenditure doubles to R14.8 billion* High Court of SA exposes DMR as “irrational & incompetent” 3,600 public servants found guilty of corruption
Hawks’ attack on ex-Finance Minister Gordhan nonsensical Reckless cabinet reshuffle; clearly influenced by Guptas 80 ANC municipalities dysfunctional due to corruption/incompetence
ANC admits it may be destroyed by corruption & fraud *Note: 650k houses, 210k jobs, R100b output
Non-resident ownership of South African government bonds (Sources: National Treasury; SARB)
900
Rb 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Speculation over downgrade fuelled by the increase in total public sector gross debt as % of GDP since the recession…
% 45
40
35
30
19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 06 20 07 20 08 20 09 20 10 20 11 20 12 20 13 20 14 20 15 20 16
25
…and SA’s leading business cycle indicator continues to lag behind that of key trading partners… (Source: SARB) Index, 2010 = 100
125 US
115 Other countries
105
95 SA
85
75 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16
…whilst GDP growth remains on a downward trajectory (Source: Stats SA)
Year-on-year %
4.5
3
1.5
-1.5
-3
3 Q 1' 17
3 Q 1' 16
3 Q 1' 15
3 Q 1' 14
3 Q 1' 13
3 Q 1' 12
3 Q 1' 11
3 Q 1' 10
3 Q 1' 09
Q 1' 08
0
…caused mainly by the commodity price declines between 2011 and 2015 (Source: World Bank) Cotton Iron ore Sugar Coal Maize Platinum % decline
Bananas Aluminium Oranges Gold
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Average ratio of foreign direct investment to GDP from 2010 to 2015 – selected emerging markets (Source: Unctad) Ghana Chile Zambia Tanzania Brazil Mexico %
Poland Turkey Egypt South Africa
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Burden of taxation continues to shift towards individuals (Sources: National Treasury; own calculations)
44
% of total
Individuals
36
VAT
28
20 Companies
12 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
Reasons for modest optimism over SA’s growth prospects
The recession is over – prepare for higher growth Dr Roelof Botha
The repo rate and inflation – inconsistency in gap tolerance, but rate cut imminent (Sources: Stats SA; SARB) 7.1
%
Repo rate
6.7 6.3 5.9 5.5 5.1 4.7
CPI
4.3
4 Q 1' 17
3
4 Q 2' 16
3
2
4 Q 1' 15
3
2
4 Q 1' 14
3
2
4 Q 1' 13
3
2
4 Q 1' 12
3
Q 2' 11
3.9
Ratings agencies often ignore a number of fundamental indicators, such as the recovery of taxation revenue (at constant 2015 prices)… 1000
Rb 900
800
700
600
500 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
…and the existence of a highly diversified composition of taxation revenue by emerging market standards (FY 2016/17- Rb)…
Total R 1.2 trillion Individuals 443
Fuel & elec. 73
Companies 200
Skills levy 18
Dividend tax 25
Excise duties 44 Property tax 16 Customs duties 55
VAT 301
…furthermore, government’s borrowing requirement as % of total gross debt continues to decline (fiscal years, National Treasury forecasts for 2017-’19)…
20
% 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
…as well as, arguably, the most important gauge of a country’s
creditworthiness – the total public debt/GDP ratio, where South Africa compares favourably with most key trading partners USA Singapore UK Germany India Brazil Malaysia
%
South Africa China Australia Mexico Russia
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fiscal stability is also reflected in a budget deficit/GDP ratio that is only marginally above 3% and forecast to decline further
1.5 % (fiscal years)
0 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18
-1.5 -3 -4.5 -6 -7.5
According to the World Economic Forum, South Africa remains the most competitive large economy in sub-Saharan Africa - out of 144 countries Mauritius Ranking
South Africa Rwanda Botswana Namibia Ivory Coast Zambia Kenya Gabon Ethiopia
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
South Africa possesses balance of payments stability, due to a huge financial account surplus (Source: SARB; Note: 2016 = preliminary) 250
R billion
200 Financial account
150 100 50 0 -50
'03
'04
'05
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
-100 -150 -200 -250
Current account
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
South Africa has some stunning competitiveness strengths to build on (Source: WEF - 2016) South Africa’s highest-ranked competitiveness indicators (selection out of 138 countries)
Auditing & reporting standards
1
Soundness of banks
2
Financial services meeting business needs
2
Regulation of securities exchange
3
Efficiency of legal framework
9
Quality of air transport infrastructure
10
Strength of investor protection
14
Quality of management schools
21
Capacity for innovation
25
Domestic market size
27
Selected commodity price changes between early 2016 and April 2017 (Source: World Bank) Iron ore Coal Tin Oranges Aluminium Sugar
%
Gold Nickel Platinum Tobacco
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Mineral sales at current prices (quarterly) (Sources: StatsSA; own calculations) R billion
120
115
110
105
100
95
90 Q1'14
2
3
4
Q1'15
2
3
4
Q1'16
2
3
4
Q1'17
Tourist arrivals from overseas (Source: Stats SA)
‘000 2 600 2 500 2 400 2 300 2 200 2 100 2 000 1 900 1 800 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Primary agriculture trade balance (R91b surplus since 2013) (Source: SARS)
70
Rb
60 Exports
50 Imports
40 30 20 10 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Continued progress with employment creation in South Africa (2.2 million jobs created since Q1 2010) Source: Stats SA
16.3
Million (formal sector = 70%) 16.05 15.8 15.55 15.3 15.05 14.8 14.55 14.3 14.05
Q 4 1' 17
Q 2' 16
4
Q 2' 15
4
Q 2' 14
4
Q 2' 13
4
Q 2' 12
4
Q 2' 11
4
Q 2' 10
4
Q 2' 09
13.8
Ratio between household disposable income & debt (Sources: SARB; own calculations) Index; Q1 2014 = 100
108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 Q1'14
2
3
4
Q1'15
2
3
4
Q1'16
2
3
4
Q1'17
South Africa’s real GDP per capita has reached a structurally higher level & the country is classified by the UN as “upper middle income" Source: SARB
74
R ‘000 (constant ‘15p) 71 68 65 62 59 56 53 50 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Researched & prepared by Dr Roelof Botha Sources of basic data include the SA Reserve Bank, Stats SA, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IMF & the World Bank Group
Biographical notes: Dr Roelof Botha received his early schooling in Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands and three different provinces in South Africa A diversified career has been followed in management accounting; financial journalism; lecturing; consulting; and economic research He is a regular commentator & columnist in the national media and has authored more than 500 articles, books and research publications His Honours and Masters degrees were both obtained cum laude at the University of Pretoria, whilst the Doctorate was completed at the University of Johannesburg In 2005, he received the prestigious Finmedia Economist of the Year award, based on the accuracy of forecasts of key economic indicators Current activities include being a Senior Adjunct Faculty member of the Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) Economic advisor to PricewaterhouseCoopers for the past 27 years Mobile no: 083 226 8921; E-mail:
[email protected]