Goodness of Fit test H0: p1 = 0.25 p2 = 0.50 p3 = 0.25 Descriptive Statistics N Genotype

Mean 100

2.0900

Std. Deviation .66810

Chi-Square Test Frequencies Genotype Observed N A B C Total

Expected N 18 55 27 100

Test Statistics Genotype Chi-Square df Asymp. Sig.

a

2.620 2 .270

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected cell frequency is

Residual 25.0 50.0 25.0

-7.0 5.0 2.0

Minimum 1.00

Maximum 3.00

Homogeneity test H0 : p 1 = p 2 = p 3 = p 4 Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Profession * Alcoholic

Missing Percent

N

1201

100.0%

Total Percent

0

N .0%

Profession * Alcoholic Crosstabulation Count Alcoholic Alcoholic Profession

Clergy Educators Executives Merchants

Total

32

Nonalcoholic 268

51 67 83 233

199 233 268 968

Chi-Square Tests Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association

df a

20.492 22.458 16.841

N of Valid Cases 1201 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 48.50.

Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 3 .000 3 .000 1 .000

Total 300 250 300 351 1201

1201

Percent 100.0%

Independent test / Test for association H0: There is no association between hair loss and shampoo brand Case Processing Summary Cases Valid

Missing

N hairloss * shampoo

Percent 30

N 100.0%

Total Percent

0

N .0%

30

hairloss * shampoo Crosstabulation shampoo Sonsik hairloss

bald

Count Expected Count

12 8.50

Head&Shudders 5 8.50

hairly

Count Expected Count

3 6.50

10 6.50

13 13.00

Count Expected Count

15 15.00

15 15.00

30 30.00

Total

Total 17 17.00

Chi-Square Tests Value

df a

Pearson Chi-Square b

Continuity Correction Likelihood Ratio

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases

6.6516 4.8869 6.9464

Exact Sig. (2sided)

.0253 6.4299 30

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Asymp. Sig. (2sided) 1 .0099 1 .0271 1 .0084 1

.0112

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.0127

Percent 100.0%