Methods for Using Primary & Secondary Sources in the History Classroom Presented at the Illinois Council for the Social Studies Fall Conference, October 17, 2014 by Lauren S. Brown, Northern Illinois University contact:
[email protected] Documents listed are below with corresponding Common Core Standards in Literacy See the pages that follow for documents. Document 1 (Annexation of the Philippines) goes with: CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inference from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 2: Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. Doc 2 (Overland Trail) goes with: CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 1&2 above CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 9: Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take. Document 3 (Nativism) goes with: CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 4: Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone. Document 4 (Dred Scott) goes with: CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 5: Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text relate to each other and the whole. CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
Lauren S. Brown
1
Doc 1 President McKinley on the decision to annex the Philippines: The truth is I didn't want the Philippines, and when they came to us as a gift from the gods, I did not know what to do with them.... I sought counsel from all sides - Democrats as well as Republicans - but got little help. I thought first we would take only Manila; then Luzon; then other islands, perhaps, also. I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight; and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed to Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night late it came to me this way - I don't know how it was, but it came: (1) That we could not give them back to Spain - that would be cowardly and dishonorable; (2) that we could not turn them over to France or Germany - our commercial rivals in the Orient - that would be bad business and discreditable; (3) that we could not leave them to themselves - they were unfit for self-government - and they would soon have anarchy and misrule over there worse than Spain's was; and (4) that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God's grace do the very best we could by them, as our fellow men for whom Christ also died. Directions: Circle the correct answer below and explain why that is the best answer, providing support from the quotation. 1. McKinley seems to view annexation as a. an obligation b. an opportunity c. immoral d. bad for business 2. McKinley sees the U.S. in the role of a. ruler b. tyrant c. oppressor d. savior
Lauren S. Brown
2
Doc 2: Excepts from women’s diaries written on the Overland Trail Directions: In the column to the right of each entry, describe or explain briefly what this entry tells us about life on the Overland Trail. (Answers for teacher provided.) June 2 Passed 7 graves . . . made 14 miles. June 26 Passed 8 graves. June 29 Passed 10 graves. June 30 Passed 10 graves . . . made 22 miles. July 1 Passed 8 graves . . . made 21 miles. July 2 One man of our company died. Passed 8 graves made 16 miles. July 4 Passed 2 graves . . . made 16 miles. July 5 Passed 9 graves ,made 18 miles. July 6 Passed 6 graves, made 9 miles. July 11 Passed 5 graves . . . made 15 miles. — diary of Cecelia McMillen Adams, 1852
death; consider how travelers must have felt seeing all these graves day after day
In the entry below, what problem explains what the writer saw on June 9 and 16? disease May 30 -‐-‐ Saw several graves today one with inscription. . . . we counted 5 graves close together only one with inscription . . . June 1 Graves now are often partly dug up. June 9 -‐-‐ Most graves look as if they were dug and finished in a hurry. June 16 -‐-‐ It is common to see beds and clothing discarded by the road not to be used again. — diary of Caroline Richardson, 1852 Saturday, September 10th It would be useless for me with my pencil to describe the awful road we have just passed over. . . . It is something more than half mile long very rocky all the way, quite steep, winding, sideling, deep down, slippery and muddy, made so by a spring running the entire length of the road, and this road is cut down so deep that at times the cattle and wagons are almost out of sight, with no room for the drivers except on the bank, a very difficult place to drive, also dangerous, and to make the matter worse, there was a slow poking train ahead of us, which kept stopping every few minutes . . . .
dangerous & women could be pregnant or even giving birth during treacherous parts of the trip
Friday, September 17th In camp yet. Still raining. . . A few days later my eighth child was born. After this we picked up and ferried across the Columbia River. . . taking three days to complete. — diary of Amelia Stewart Knight, 1853
What does the entry below tell us about the jobs of men and women along the Trail? To add to the horrors of the surroundings one man was bitten on the ankle by a venomous snake. Although every available remedy was tried upon the wound, his limb had to be amputated with the aid of a common handsaw. Fortunately, for him, he had a good, brave wife along who helped and cheered him into health and usefulness; for it was not long before much that he could do and was not considered a burden, although the woman had to do a man’s work . . . . — Catherine Haun, 1849
Lauren S. Brown
traditional gender roles still applied on the trail but were adaptable when conditions warranted
3
Doc 3:
Immigration and the Rise of Nativism, 1880-1924 As the Civil War drew to a close, Chicago looked ahead. Read the excerpt from the Chicago Tribune, below and answer the questions which follow:
“Europe will open her gates like a conquered city. Her people will come forth to us subdued by admiration of our glory and envy of our perfect peace. On to the Rocky Mountains and still over to the Pacific our mighty populations will spread....Our thirty millions will be tripled in thirty years.” — Chicago Tribune, September 28, 1864: 1. The attitude in the article seems to be a. positive about increased immigration. b. negative about increased immigration.
2. Explain: (what parts of the passage show this?)
Now read the following quotations. Each of them is a good example of nativism, which you will define at the end. What do each of the passages have in common? What seem to be the authors’ view of immigration, positive or negative? More specifically, what is the complaint expressed in each passage?
“The nation has reached a point in its growth where its policy should be to preserve its heritage for coming generations, not to donate it to all the strangers we can induce to come among us.” — letter to the editor, New York Tribune, July 2, 1881 “Our era...of happy immunity from those social diseases which are the danger and the humiliation of Europe is passing away...every year brings the conditions of American labor into closer likeness to those of the Old World.” — Atlantic Monthly, 1882 “We could, by wise laws and just conditions, lift up the toilers of our own country to the level of the middle classes, but a vast multitude of the miserable of other lands clung to their skirts and dragged them down. Our country was the safety-valve which permitted the discontent of the Old World to escape. — Ignatius Donnelly, The Golden Bottle, 1895 “We have become the world’s melting pot. The scum of creation has been dumped on us. Some of our principal cities are more foreign than American. The most dangerous and corrupting hordes of the Old World have invaded us. The manufacturers are mainly to blame. They wanted cheap labor: and they didn’t care a curse how much harm to our future might be the consequence of their heartless policy.” — Thomas E. Watson, 1910 “I think we now have sufficient population in our country for us to shut the door and to breed up a pure, unadulterated citizenship . . . Thank God we have in [this country] perhaps the largest percentage of any country in the world of the pure, unadulterated Anglo-Saxon stock….It is for the preservation of that splendid stock that I would make this not an asylum for the oppressed of all countries, but a country to assimilate and perfect that splendid type of manhood that has made our country the foremost Nation in her progress.” — Speech by South Carolina Senator Ellison D. Smith, April 9, 1924 How have attitudes about immigrants changed since the Chicago Tribune article of 1864 quoted at the top? What is nativism? Based on the documents above, define nativism and explain the reasons for it in a paragraph. (use reverse side of paper) Lauren S. Brown
4
CCSS-ELA-LITERACY RH 4: Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone. Phrases from the Constitution necessary and proper interstate commerce speech due process search and seizure cruel and unusual punishment
Lauren S. Brown
Phrases from Supreme Court Decisions separate but equal – Plessy v. Ferguson with all deliberate speed – Brown v. Board shouting fire in a crowded theatre – Schenk v. U.S.
5
Doc 4: The Dred Scott Decision (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sanford Directions: Read the questions, then read the text below from the majority opinion of the decision in order to answer them. Underline parts of the text which support your answer. The issues: 1. Was Dred Scott, a Negro slave, a citizen? 2. Did he have the right to sue? “The question is simply this: Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guaranteed by that instrument to the citizen? One of which rights is the privilege of suing in a court of the United States…. “We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution, and can, therefore, claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. 3. Is slave property different from other kinds of property? “Now the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution….And no word can be found in the Constitution which gives Congress a greater power over slave property, or which entitles property of that kind to less protection than property of any other description….” 4. Had residence in free territory made him free? “The rights of private property have been guarded….An Act of Congress which deprives a person of the United States of his liberty or property merely because he came himself or brought his property into a particular Territory of the United States, and who had committed no offense against the laws, could hardly be dignified with the name due process of law….” 5. Did Congress have the power to prohibit slavery in a territory? “Upon these considerations, it is the opinion of the court that the Act of Congress which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned [Missouri Compromise], is not warranted by the Constitution, and is therefore void; and that neither Dred Scott himself, nor any of his family, were made free by being carried into this territory….” Therefore, according to the Supreme Court, the Missouri Compromise is _____________________. (constitutional or unconstitutional?) Summarize the argument of the Court in 5 steps, below or on reverse, 1-5:
Lauren S. Brown
6
USING SECONDARY SOURCES & COMMON CORE STANDARDS: A student-centered inquiry-approach strategy using (mostly) secondary sources to help students understand complex problems or questions with multiple answers The technique in a nutshell: 1. Take a complex question that has multiple answers—not necessarily conflicting answers. Example A: Why didn’t the U.S. do more to help save European Jews from the Holocaust Example B: What are the causes of the Cold War? 2. Take the “answers” to the question and turn them into “categories.” Example A: Competing concerns; People didn’t necessarily comprehend the extent of what was happening to the Jews, Existence of anti-‐immigrant feeling in general and anti-‐Semitism in particular; country was still in a depression/financial issues, Political/bureaucratic problems Example B: Long-‐standing antagonism between US and USSR; long-‐standing American anti-‐communist attitudes; roots in WWII; power vacuum after WWII; specific actions of US viewed as aggressive by USSR; specific actions of USSR viewed aggressive by US 3. Type up paragraphs either directly from secondary source material or write your own. Can also include some primary sources, quotations, map, graph, etc. This information will go on cards. Make a set of cards for however many groups of students you have. You might want to add a question/hint/other info to help students figure out some of the cards. Also type up the categories onto cards. (These can be a different size or color, so students see that these are different). 4. Provide students with the overall question or issue. You may need an introduction or even an entire introductory lesson, depending on the question. 5. In small groups, have students lay out the category cards and then read the other cards, placing them into the appropriate category. 6. Conclude with a discussion about the “answers.” Depending on the topic, it may be important to emphasize that not all the “answers” are of equal weight, or agreed on by all historians. Some “answers” may have been more of an issue at the time, while others are best understood with the advantage of hindsight.
Lauren S. Brown
7
Sample cards from US Response to the Holocaust Lesson (full lesson provided online at ushistoryideas.blogspot.com) * Please email me at
[email protected] if you would like more information.
Card #7. A Jewish American recalls, We knew about what was happening to the Jews of Europe, but we didn’t know about “the Holocaust.” What does this person mean? What does this tell you about the difficulties of trying to rally support for European Jews? Best Category: Hard to Define Problem; People don’t see it as an issue Like Card #3, this card demonstrates the problem of hindsight or presentism. We know about the 6 million Jews but no one knew that at the time. In fact, the term “Holocaust” was not used until well after the war. Card #8. The British government opposed the establishment of the U.S. War Refugee Board, fearing that the Jews whom it rescued would attempt to enter Palestine and spark further unrest among the Palestinian Arab population. What was the larger problem that the British feared? How would that restrict President Roosevelt? What was happening in Palestine? Best Category: competing concerns or other issues more important (Or, Politics & Bureaucracy-but politics, not so much bureaucracy) Britain controlled the territory of Palestine. There was already considerable conflict between Jews and Arabs in the area (that of course continues into the present). Britain had to be careful not to create a problem for itself in Palestine—especially as Britain was busy with the war in Europe! Card #9. Clause in 1924 U.S. immigration law allowing refusal of an immigrant if that person was “likely to become a public charge.” (i.e. need $ support from govt) Later, this was made more stringent, excluding those who might “possibly” (vs. “likely”) to become a public charge. How would this clause affect efforts to allow Jews to enter the U.S.? Best Category: Financial Problems With the Depression still front and center of every Americans, no one would be very excited about letting in immigrants who might take their jobs or need support from the government. Remember that the Depression doesn’t really end until after the war starts. See also card #14 Lauren S. Brown
8