JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 72(3), 426–436 Copyright © 1999, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Millon’s Normal Personality Styles and Dimensions Stephen Strack Los Angeles Ambulatory Care Center U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Millon’s normal personality styles and dimensions emanate from the same evolutionary model he developed to explain personality pathology. For him, normal and abnormal personality lie along a continuum with no sharp demarcation to distinguish the two. The major difference is that normal individuals demonstrate adaptive flexibility in responding to their environment, whereas disordered persons exhibit rigid and maladaptive behavior. In this article, I present a historical introduction to Millon’s ideas on normality, descriptions of his normal personality styles and dimensions, up-to-date empirical findings, and avenues for future research. I conclude that, with additional validity data, Millon’s model of normal personality may be suitable for an expanded Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) Axis II that allows for diagnosis of normal personality types when a complete personality disorder syndrome is absent.

Millon’s (1969/1983b, 1994; Millon, Green, & Meagher, 1982a, 1982b; Strack, 1987, 1991b) normal personality styles and dimensions emanate from his broadly based evolutionary model of personality that differentiates and links healthy and pathological character on a continuum. This model is closely aligned with that adopted by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) for Axis II of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [DSM–IV]; APA, 1994). Because of this, researchers and clinicians have at their disposal a framework for understanding a complete array of personality types ranging from the healthy to the pathological. The continuous relation between the domains of normality and pathology in Millon’s model allows personologists to study the ways that healthy and disordered personalities are similar and different, the developmental processes that lead to various outcomes, and perhaps most important, how disordered individuals may be restored to healthy functioning. In this article, I give a historical introduc-

NORMAL PERSONALITY

427

tion to Millon’s ideas on normality, present his normal personality styles and dimensions, summarize empirical findings, and discuss avenues for research.

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS Millon (1969/1983b) presented his original biosocial-learning theory of personality in Modern Psychopathology. There he proposed three axes (active–passive, pleasure–pain, and self–other) as the basic building blocks of normal and abnormal personality. Conceived in terms of instrumental coping patterns designed to maximize positive reinforcements and avoid punishment, the model crossed the active–passive axis with four reinforcement strategies (detached, dependent, independent, and ambivalent) to derive eight basic personality patterns (asocial, avoidant, submissive, gregarious, narcissistic, aggressive, conforming, negativistic) and three severe variants (schizoid, cycloid, paranoid). The basic patterns were thought to be present in both normal and disordered persons, whereas the severe styles were evident only in abnormal form. Millon’s (1969/1983b) assumptions about normal personality were outlined as follows: (a) Normal and abnormal personality are shaped according to the same basic processes and learning principles; (b) normal personality is on a continuum with pathological personality; (c) no sharp dividing line exists between normal and abnormal personality types; and (d) normal personality patterns may be distinguished from pathological patterns by their adaptive flexibility and balance on the active–passive, pleasure–pain, and self–other polarities: When an individual displays an ability to cope with his environment in a flexible and adaptive manner and when his characteristic perceptions and behaviors foster increments in personal gratification, then he may be said to possess a normal and healthy personality pattern. (p. 222)

Although Millon (1969/1983b) clearly addressed both normal and abnormal character types, the focus of that text on personality disorders overshadowed healthy personality development. Normal personality styles were not described there or in Millon’s (1981) subsequent text, Disorders of Personality. In the early 1970s, Millon (1974) and his colleagues developed a research instrument, the Millon Personality Inventory, that assessed normal and abnormal personality traits. It was used primarily by students and was not widely distributed, but it did signal Millon’s early interest in normal traits and served as a springboard for development of later measures. Nondisordered personality styles were not disseminated to a large audience until the publication of the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory (MAPI; Millon et al., 1982a) and Millon Behavioral Health Inventory (MBHI; Millon et al., 1982b).

428

STRACK

These instruments were developed and normed for use in health care settings and presented personalities that were different from personality disorders. Curiously, Millon did not alert test users to the essential differences between these styles and personality disorders. Nevertheless, careful readers could grasp the differences by comparing them with the personalities described in earlier texts and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) manual (Millon, 1977, 1983a). Significantly, Millon gave different names to the normal styles (see Table 1) and used terminology that was much less severe than that used for the personality disorders. For example, normal introversive personalities were described in the MBHI manual as “colorless,” “quiet,” and “unconcerned about their problems” (Millon et al., 1982b, p. 2), and Millon (1983a) reported in the MCMI manual that disordered schizoid (asocial) persons demonstrated “an inability to display enthusiasm or experience pleasure,” “obscure thought processes,” and a “lack of vitality” (p. 4). The first published work devoted exclusively to Millon’s healthy personality styles was an article describing the development and validation of the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL; Strack, 1987). The instrument provided self-report and rating measures of Millon’s basic eight personality patterns and was normed solely on normal adults. In that initial report and several subsequent articles (Strack, 1991a, 1992, 1993, 1994; Strack & Lorr, 1990a, 1990b; Strack, Lorr, & Campbell, 1990), my colleagues and I provided considerable empirical evidence in support of Millon’s proposition that his normal styles are quite similar to their personality disorder counterparts. In the mid-1980s Millon (1986, 1987, 1996, 1997; Millon & Davis, 1994) began altering his model and clinical measures to accommodate changes in DSM Axis II (APA, 1987, 1994). He also widened his focus by placing his model in an evolutionary framework (Millon, 1990a, 1990b). From a structural perspective these changes resulted in the addition of a discordant reinforcement strategy (where pleasure and pain have reversed value) and three abnormal personality styles, depressive, aggressive–sadistic, and self-defeating. The dimensional approach to normal personality presented by Millon (1990a, 1990b) was his first effort to delineate healthy character styles outside the domain of psychopathology. It was followed with the publication of the Millon Index of Personality Styles (MIPS; Millon, 1994), a measure for use with normal adults that assesses trait dimensions and character styles. Millon’s new perspective was developed without reference to disorder but borrowed many concepts from his original model of personality. In this approach Millon considered the universe of traits and interpersonal styles that exist in the normal population and came up with three sets of personality variables to define and measure them. The first set, called motivating aims, represent his three basic axes in evolutionary form. The original pleasure–pain polarity was called enhancing–preserving, active–passive was modifying–accommodating, and self–other was individuating–nurturing. The second set of variables, which were borrowed

NORMAL PERSONALITY

429

TABLE 1 Names for Normal Personality Styles From 1969 to the Present Modern Psychopathology, 1969 MAPI, 1982 MBHI, 1982 PACL, 1987 Asocial (passive–detached) Avoidant (active–detached) Submissive (passive– dependent) Gregarious (active–dependent) Narcissistic (passive– independent) Aggressive (active– independent) Conforming (passive– ambivalent) Negativistic (active– ambivalent)

Introversive Introversive Inhibited Inhibited Cooperative Cooperative

MIPS, 1994

Introversive Inhibited Cooperative

Retiring Hesitating Agreeing

Sociable Confident

Sociable Confident

Sociable Confident

Outgoing Asserting

Forceful

Forceful

Forceful

Respectful

Respectful

Respectful

Dissenting Controlling (active–discordant) Conforming

Sensitive

Sensitive

Sensitive

Complaining Yielding (passive–discordant)

Note. MAPI = Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory; MBHI = Millon Behavioral Health Inventory; PACL = Personality Adjective Check List; MIPS = Millon Index of Personality Styles.

from Jung (1936/1971), were termed cognitive modes. For Millon, cognition means an individual’s primary source of obtaining information and the means by which that information is processed or transformed. Preferred sources of information can be the self (internal) or others (external), and either tangible or intangible. Preferred means of transforming information can be intellectual or affective and assimilative versus imaginative. The last set of variables describe 10 common interpersonal behaviors or styles. Eight of the 10 personalities are essentially the same as those measured by the MAPI, MBHI, and PACL, and are empirically related to personality disorders (see Table 1). Two additional styles, doleful and self-demeaning, are hypothesized to be related to the depressive and self-defeating personality disorders, but empirical evidence is needed to verify this. NORMAL STYLES AND DIMENSIONS Millon’s normal personalities and dimensions are briefly described in this section. As noted in Table 1, 8 of 10 styles are measured by the MAPI, MBHI, and PACL. The MIPS assesses 10 interpersonal types as well as the newer motivational and cognitive dimensions. Styles

Introversive/retiring (asocial, passive–detached). Aloof and solitary by nature, these individuals prefer limited social involvement. They are easygoing,

430

STRACK

slow-paced, and reserved. They rarely show strong emotion and may appear to others as dull and lacking in spontaneity.

Inhibited/hesitating (avoidant, active–detached). Shy and sensitive to criticism, these individuals keep others at an arm’s distance and remain on the periphery of social gatherings. They are typically kind and considerate and do not like to draw attention to themselves. They are wary of novelty and seek stable rather than changeable environments.

Cooperative/agreeing (submissive, passive–dependent). These individuals value communality and seek others’ approval. They are docile, obliging, and agreeable. They tend to think poorly of their own skills and seek stronger individuals to lean on.

Sociable/outgoing (gregarious, active–dependent). Active and extroverted, these individuals seek high levels of stimulation and attention. They are often spontaneous, colorful, and dramatic. Their interests and emotions change frequently and others may experience them as shallow and fickle.

Confident/asserting (narcissistic, passive–independent). Typically bold and self-assured, these individuals think highly of themselves and expect others to cater to their wishes and demands. They can be charming and manipulative and others may see them as lacking empathy.

Forceful/dissenting (aggressive, active–independent). Assertive and socially dominant, these individuals are adventurous, competitive, and nonconforming. They persevere in difficult circumstances but can be inconsiderate of others’ needs. They are often brusque and insensitive in their tactics and downplay the value of tender emotions.

Controlling (aggressive, active–discordant). Domineering and aggressive, these individuals see themselves as being tough-minded and fearless in a world that is harsh and threatening. They are often exploitive and manipulative and do not mind stepping on others’ toes if doing so will get them what they want.

NORMAL PERSONALITY

431

Respectful/conforming (conforming, passive–ambivalent). Rule-bound and conscientious, these individuals are hard-working and respectful of those in authority. They tend to be perfectionistic and emotionally constricted. They are methodical and persistent but can be too rigid and moralistic in their efforts to live up to conventional standards.

Sensitive/complaining (negativistic, active–ambivalent). Unconventional and moody, these individuals march to the beat of a different drummer and are not happy with the status quo. They are often loyal and forthright with their opinions but are also awkward, changeable, and fault finding. Yielding (negativistic, passive–discordant). Submissive and self-demeaning, these individuals expect the worst and often contribute to their own unhappiness. They are frequently moody, irritable, and pessimistic.

Motivational Dimensions

Enhancing versus preserving (pleasure–pain). This dimension measures an individual’s orientation toward life-enhancement activities versus those aimed at life preservation. From a behavioral standpoint, this is translated into pleasure seeking versus avoidance of painful experiences. Those scoring high on the enhancing scale are outgoing and optimistic, while those scoring high on the preserving scale are worrisome and pessimistic. Modifying versus accommodating (active–passive). This continuum assesses how individuals adapt themselves to their environment. For Millon, modifying persons are those who actively seek to manipulate and change their surroundings, whereas accommodating persons mold themselves to fit in with existing circumstances. Individuals who score high on the modifying scale take charge of their lives and play an active role in shaping the events that impact them. Those who score high on the accommodating scale tend to be dependent and acquiescent. Individuating versus nurturing (self–other). This dimension assesses the behavioral manifestations of one’s reproductive strategy. According to Millon, individuals tend toward propagation of the self or nurturance of others. There is an obvious parallel with masculinity– femininity, but this axis is more broadly based. Persons who score high on the individuating scale are independent, egocentric, and eager to further their own aims. Those who obtain high scores on the nurturing scale value communality and tend to be gentle and protective of others.

432

STRACK

Cognitive Dimensions

Extroversing versus introversing. Extroversing individuals look to others for information, attention, and stimulation. They are outgoing and feel most comfortable in social surroundings. Those with strong introversing traits tend to be private and closed off from external stimulation. They value their own thoughts and feelings as informational resources. Sensing versus intuiting. High sensing individuals seek information from tangible, literal, well-defined sources. For them, “seeing is believing.” Those who are primarily intuiting place structure and fact in the background and focus most intently on intangible sources of information such as personal insight. Thinking versus feeling. Thinking individuals prefer to process information using cool logic and analytic reasoning. They downplay the value of emotions in evaluating problems and circumstances. By contrast, those who process information with feelings rely on subjective experience to assist them. They use empathy and affective responding in analyzing problem situations. Systematizing versus innovating. Systematizing individuals tend to evaluate new experiences on the basis of past experiences. They seek reliability and consistency. They are conservative and tend to incorporate information into well-established modes of thought. Innovating persons are open to new experiences and seek novelty. They tend to be spontaneous, creative, and flexible.

RESEARCH FINDINGS To date, studies of Millon’s normal personality styles and dimensions have assessed their internal consistency, temporal stability, convergent and discriminant validity, factor structure, and comparability to personality disorders. Many populations have been sampled, including adolescents; college students; noncollege adults and the elderly; and employees in a variety of occupations including law enforcement, military personnel, and veterans. MAPI (Millon et al., 1982a), MBHI (Millon et al., 1982b), MIPS (Millon, 1994), and PACL (Strack, 1987, 1991b) scales have demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (rs = .65–.89 by Kuder–Richardson–20 and coefficient alpha) and test–retest reliability (rs = .55–.90) over periods ranging from 1 month to 1 year. They have been linked in theoretically consistent patterns with scales from many self-report and rating instruments including the California Psychological Inventory (Millon et al., 1982a, 1982b; Strack, 1987), Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (Millon, 1994), Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Millon, 1994;

NORMAL PERSONALITY

433

Millon et al., 1982b; Strack & Guevara, in press), NEO Personality Inventory (Millon, 1994; Pincus & Wiggins, 1990; Wiggins & Pincus, 1989), Self-Directed Search (Strack, 1994), and Sixteen Personality Factors questionnaire (Millon, 1994; Millon et al., 1982a; Strack, 1987). Findings are too numerous to present here, but summaries can be found in the appropriate test manuals as well as in Strack (1993, 1997) for the PACL, and Weiss (1997) for the MIPS. They convincingly demonstrate that the normal personalities exhibit trait patterns that are predicted by theory and are milder versions of the personality disorders. Each of the four assessment devices have yielded similar factor structures for the personality styles. In a large normal adult sample, PACL scales showed three bipolar dimensions labeled neurotic versus controlled, assertive versus compliant, and introversion versus extroversion (Strack, 1987, 1991b). Factor analyses of the MAPI (Hynan, Pantle, & Foster, 1998; Millon et al., 1982a) and MBHI (Millon et al., 1982b) have been performed on clinical samples with symptom measures included. Nevertheless, their dimensional structure is comparable to that of the PACL. Recently PACL and MIPS scales were correlated and factor analyzed together in a sample of 148 college students (Guevara & Strack, 1998). Scales measuring the same personality styles were moderately associated (rs = .35–.71). Three of four varimax-rotated factors included basic personality styles. Factor 1, which was bipolar, linked three PACL introverted, neurotic personalities (introversive, inhibited, sensitive) with pain avoidance, passivity, a solitary thinking style, and MIPS Hesitating, Retiring, Yielding, and Dissenting interpersonal styles on one end of the continuum. Loaded in the opposite direction were three PACL extroverted, socially bold personalities (sociable, confident, forceful), and the MIPS Extroversing, Outgoing, and Asserting scales. Factor 2, which was also bipolar, linked PACL confident and forceful personalities with MIPS Controlling, Individuating, Dissenting, Asserting, Innovating, and Thinking scales on the positive pole, and the PACL cooperative style with MIPS Nurturing and Feeling on the negative end. Factor 3 associated the PACL respectful style and MIPS Conforming, Systematizing, Thinking, Modifying, Sensing, Asserting, Outgoing, and Enhancing scales on one end of the continuum and PACL sensitive on the other. This dimension taps conscientiousness, emotional control versus lack of emotional control, and elements of extroversion. Factor analyses of PACL, MCMI–I, and MCMI–II personality scales have revealed comparable results. PACL’s three higher order dimensions (Strack, 1987, 1991b) correspond to the three factors found by Retzlaff and Gibertini (1987) for MCMI–I basic eight scales among psychiatric patients and normal adults, and by Strack, Lorr, Campbell, and Lamnin (1992) for the 13 MCMI–II personality scales with patients. A joint factor analysis of PACL and MCMI–II basic personality scales among college students yielded three factors (using residual scores), with corresponding PACL and MCMI–II scales loading on the same dimensions (Strack, 1991a).

434

STRACK

A PATH TO THE FUTURE There is still much to be learned about the structure and behavior of Millon’s normal personality styles and their relation to personality disorders. An important housekeeping issue is further validation of the new controlling and yielding personalities and the motivational and cognitive dimensions found on the MIPS. Studies that employ ratings and focus on real-life behavior are especially important for all of the Millon measures. In the realm of personality disorders, we need longitudinal investigations and side-by-side comparisons of matched groups of normals and patients to get at the essential similarities and differences between these populations (Strack & Lorr, 1994, 1997). Evidence from correlational self-report studies suggests that Millon’s normal personalities are healthier, more flexible, and more adaptive than their personality disorder counterparts, but we need direct proof. As additional validation evidence becomes available it should prod the APA to consider expanding DSM–IV Axis II to include Millon’s normal styles for diagnosis when a complete personality disorder syndrome is absent. This makes sense because personality is ostensibly dimensional in nature and all psychiatric patients have a personality that affects the Axis I conditions they are susceptible to, as well as their response to treatment. Expanding Axis II in this manner will permit clinicians to see how personality impacts all of their patients. Millon’s model offers a practical approach that can be incorporated into the current taxonomy without major changes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. I thank Abby Adorney, Lisa Dieckmann, and Peter Graves for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. Information on Millon’s normal personality styles and dimensions can be found on the Internet at http://www.hometown.net/millon.html.

REFERENCES American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Guevara, L. F., & Strack, S. (1998). An examination of Millon’s dimensional and stylistic descriptions of normal personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 337–348. Hynan, L. S., Pantle, M. L., & Foster, B. M. (1998). Factor structure of the Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory for psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Reports, 82, 267–274.

NORMAL PERSONALITY

435

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychology typology. In Psychological types (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1936) Millon, T. (1974). Millon Personality Inventory. Philadelphia: Saunders. Millon, T. (1977). Millon Multiaxial Clinical Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality. New York: Wiley. Millon, T. (1983a). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Millon, T. (1983b). Modern psychopathology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland. (Original work published 1969) Millon, T. (1986). A theoretical derivation of pathological personalities. In T. Millon & G. L. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSM–IV (pp. 639–670). New York: Guilford. Millon, T. (1987). Manual for the MCMI–II (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Millon, T. (1990a). Normality: What may we learn from evolutionary theory? In D. Offer & M. Sabshin (Eds.), The diversity of normal behavior (pp. 356–404). New York: Basic Books. Millon, T. (1990b). Toward a new personology. New York: Wiley. Millon, T. (1994). Millon Index of Personality Styles manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Millon, T. (1997). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Millon, T., & Davis, R. D. (1994). Millon’s evolutionary model of normal and abnormal personality: Theory and measures. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 79–113). New York: Springer. Millon, T., Green, C., & Meagher, R. B. (1982a). Millon Adolescent Personality Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Millon, T., Green, C., & Meagher, R. B. (1982b). Millon Behavioral Health Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. Pincus, A. L., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 342–352. Retzlaff, P. D., & Gibertini, M. (1987). Factor structure of the MCMI basic personality scales and common-item artifact. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 588–594. Strack, S. (1987). Development and validation of an adjective check list to assess the Millon personality types in a normal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 572–587. Strack, S. (1991a). Factor analysis of MCMI–II and PACL basic personality scales in a college sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 345–355. Strack, S. (1991b). Manual for the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL) (rev. ed.). South Pasadena, CA: 21st Century Assessment. Strack, S. (1992). Profile clusters for men and women on the Personality Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 204–217. Strack, S. (1993). Measuring Millon’s personality styles in normal adults. In R. J. Craig (Ed.), The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: A clinical research information synthesis (pp. 253–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Strack, S. (1994). Relating Millon’s basic personality styles and Holland’s occupational types. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 41–54. Strack, S. (1997). The PACL: Gauging normal personality styles. In T. Millon (Ed.), The Millon inventories: Clinical and personality assessment (pp. 477–497). New York: Guilford. Strack, S., & Guevara, L. F. (in press). Relating PACL measures of Millon’s basic personality styles and MMPI–2 scales in patient and normal samples. Journal of Clinical Psychology.

436

STRACK

Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (1990a). Item factor structure of the Personality Adjective Check List (PACL). Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 86–94. Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (1990b). Three approaches to interpersonal behavior and their common factors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 782–790. Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (Eds.). (1994). Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer. Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (1997). Invited essay: The challenge of differentiating normal and abnormal personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 105–122. Strack, S., Lorr, M., & Campbell, L. (1990). An evaluation of Millon’s circular model of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 353–361. Strack, S., Lorr, M., Campbell, L., & Lamnin, A. (1992). Personality and clinical syndrome factors of MCMI–II scales. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 40–52. Weiss, L. G. (1997). The MIPS: Gauging the dimensions of normality. In T. Millon (Ed.), The Millon inventories: Clinical and personality assessment (pp. 498–522). New York: Guilford. Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment, 1, 305–316.

Stephen Strack Psychology Service (116B) VA Ambulatory Care Center 351 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 E-mail: [email protected] Received January 18, 1999