HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [1] GEO_NAME

United States Arizona

CURRENT DOLLARS (millions) OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT [SIC-derived] 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 $4,649,020 $5,053,003 $5,366,080 $5,651,747 $5,842,665 $6,167,644 $6,467,698 $6,912,844 $7,299,372 $7,749,965 $8,284,432 $60,047 $64,945 $67,895 $70,632 $73,358 $82,682 $89,300 $100,374 $109,906 $119,530 $129,279

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [2] Name of Geography Geo Name geo_name GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

CURRENT DOLLARS (millions) OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT [NAICS-derived]

Nominal Gross Domestic NominalProduct Gross Domestic (millions) NominalProduct [NAICS-derived] Gross Domestic (millions) NominalProduct 1997 [NAICS-derived] Gross Domestic (millions) NominalProduct 1998 [NAICS-derived] Gross Domestic (millions) Nominal Product 1999 Gross [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product 2000 Gross [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2001 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2002 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2003 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2004 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2005 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2006 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2007 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2008 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2009 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2010 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions) Nominal Product Gross 2011 [NAICS-derived] Domestic (millions)Product 2012 [NAICS-derived] (millions) 2013 [NAICSRaw GDP (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 1997 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 1998 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 1999 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2000 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2001 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2002 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2003 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2004 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2005 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2006 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2007 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2008 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2009 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2010 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2011 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2012 (mil$) [NAICS] Raw GDP 2013 (mil$) [NAICS] 2014 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_1997 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_1998 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_1999 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2000 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2001 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2002 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2003 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2004 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2005 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2006 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2007 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2008 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2009 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2010 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2011 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2012 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2013 raw-mil-dollars_gdp-NAICS_2014

1997 NA $8,549,209 $132,795 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1998 NA $9,030,651 $143,542 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 NA NA $9,578,745 $9,906,059 $10,373,523 $11,059,174 $11,817,477 $12,508,774 $13,075,688 $13,269,057 $12,994,636 $13,461,662 $13,953,082 $14,606,938 $15,079,920 $9,602,088 $10,225,879 $10,562,041 $10,916,911 $11,446,549 $12,206,995 $13,022,458 $13,781,347 $14,399,635 $14,635,348 $14,329,566 $14,869,544 $15,416,873 $16,060,678 $16,665,215 $17,316,314 $156,118 $166,108 $172,634 $179,892 $192,663 $204,659 $227,047 $248,075 $262,280 $259,238 $243,300 $248,542 $256,972 $267,493 $274,734 $284,156 NA NA $3,021 $3,219 $3,438 $3,650 $3,968 $4,426 $4,952 $4,946 $4,787 $4,871 $4,855 $5,030 $5,214 NA NA $2,415 $2,613 $2,862 $3,088 $3,473 $3,965 $4,121 $3,859 $3,578 $3,613 $3,671 $3,731 $3,751 NA NA $129,086 $135,359 $144,853 $153,751 $170,678 $186,728 $196,291 $193,233 $179,998 $183,248 $192,242 $203,531 $209,523 NA NA $2,892 $3,051 $3,327 $3,606 $4,178 $4,821 $5,101 $4,884 $4,546 $4,445 $4,447 $4,651 $4,792 NA NA $2,531 $2,593 $2,786 $3,006 $3,328 $3,538 $3,804 $3,885 $4,060 $4,235 $4,299 $4,181 $4,221 NA NA $23,084 $23,412 $25,320 $26,475 $28,970 $31,260 $33,708 $33,858 $32,401 $32,983 $33,271 $34,764 $35,412 NA NA $3,108 $3,506 $3,679 $4,228 $4,489 $4,850 $5,315 $5,190 $5,271 $5,354 $5,495 $5,518 $5,625

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [3] GEO_NAME

United States Arizona

INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS (millions) OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT [SIC-derived] 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 $6,076,695 $6,398,624 $6,540,047 $6,638,210 $6,627,809 $6,828,525 $6,967,716 $7,288,327 $7,539,096 $7,871,721 $8,284,432 $76,600 $80,258 $80,971 $81,606 $81,946 $90,282 $94,916 $104,104 $112,019 $120,869 $129,279

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [4] GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

1997

1998

1999

INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS (millions) OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT [NAICS-derived] 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 NA $11,545,499 $11,757,153 $12,049,274 $12,470,639 $12,892,804 $13,247,132 $13,458,409 $13,364,125 $12,994,636 $13,268,823 $13,474,305 $13,826,165 $14,060,496 $12,625,285 $12,743,582 $12,970,907 $13,303,867 $13,772,746 $14,211,347 $14,593,498 $14,807,001 $14,726,980 $14,329,566 $14,637,676 $14,844,093 $15,148,854 $15,431,987 $15,773,516 $202,375 $206,860 $212,375 $224,443 $232,518 $250,630 $265,181 $272,456 $264,912 $243,300 $245,948 $250,127 $255,040 $257,180 $260,799 NA $3,821 $3,969 $4,142 $4,262 $4,474 $4,819 $5,215 $5,090 $4,787 $4,828 $4,753 $4,828 $4,930 NA $3,056 $3,242 $3,472 $3,616 $3,910 $4,286 $4,308 $3,958 $3,578 $3,563 $3,552 $3,544 $3,520 NA $152,210 $157,541 $166,883 $173,131 $187,154 $198,711 $203,401 $197,379 $179,998 $181,660 $188,001 $194,731 $197,079 NA $3,809 $3,931 $4,192 $4,364 $4,819 $5,302 $5,392 $5,022 $4,546 $4,358 $4,274 $4,395 $4,490 $3,262 $3,254 $3,355 $3,484 $3,723 $3,814 $3,943 $3,946 $4,060 $4,158 $4,127 $3,967 $3,916 NA $28,523 $28,368 $30,112 $30,659 $32,433 $33,770 $35,314 $34,792 $32,401 $32,586 $32,419 $33,247 $33,355 NA $3,842 $4,302 $4,346 $4,763 $5,009 $5,266 $5,444 $5,180 $5,271 $5,204 $5,093 $5,030 $4,976 2000

NA $11,128,821 $163,224 NA NA NA NA

NA $11,607,580 $177,033 NA NA NA NA

NA $12,150,880 $192,345 NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [5] GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

2001 $67,221 $63,812 $60,770 $42,930 $42,868 $65,850 $40,461 $49,053 $52,156 $44,262

2002 $69,632 $66,099 $62,870 $45,098 $44,641 $68,564 $41,428 $50,454 $52,910 $48,546

2003 $72,505 $68,944 $65,655 $46,631 $45,988 $71,585 $43,727 $52,207 $56,248 $49,759

2004 $75,843 $72,215 $66,797 $46,823 $46,470 $72,783 $44,883 $54,459 $56,401 $54,501

NOMINAL DOLLARS OF GDP PER EMPLOYEE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 $79,313 $82,149 $83,990 $85,279 $86,092 $75,467 $78,248 $80,049 $81,468 $82,239 $70,099 $72,942 $75,062 $75,505 $74,574 $49,469 $53,372 $57,284 $57,990 $57,938 $48,652 $52,855 $54,921 $55,306 $55,555 $75,863 $78,866 $80,865 $80,630 $79,327 $48,791 $52,560 $53,734 $54,867 $54,478 $57,959 $60,293 $62,738 $65,833 $69,500 $59,687 $61,596 $64,358 $66,294 $65,945 $56,245 $58,564 $63,173 $62,211 $65,803

2010 $89,822 $85,929 $77,526 $58,863 $57,480 $82,306 $55,046 $72,973 $68,161 $67,163

2011 $91,267 $87,453 $78,703 $59,220 $58,418 $84,161 $55,451 $74,465 $68,611 $67,808

2012 $94,067 $89,802 $80,550 $60,805 $60,287 $87,342 $57,078 $74,030 $70,732 $66,955

2013 $95,143 $91,427 $81,001 $61,540 $59,673 $87,651 $57,656 $76,662 $71,307 $67,659

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [6] GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

2001 $39,890 $37,064 $32,736 $25,540 $15,064 $38,376 $16,752 $21,305 $26,864 $19,082

2002 $40,822 $37,955 $33,336 $26,536 $15,726 $39,206 $17,202 $21,636 $26,779 $21,197

2003 $42,342 $39,456 $34,964 $27,978 $16,579 $40,961 $18,271 $23,094 $28,581 $21,898

2004 $44,682 $41,690 $36,207 $29,173 $17,106 $42,270 $19,199 $24,393 $29,373 $24,464

CURRENT DOLLARS OF GDP PER CAPITA 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 $47,262 $49,512 $51,217 $51,431 $49,869 $44,067 $46,187 $47,803 $48,128 $46,711 $38,884 $41,146 $42,525 $41,278 $38,356 $31,238 $34,391 $37,963 $37,511 $35,864 $18,398 $20,212 $20,630 $19,287 $17,917 $45,216 $47,705 $48,851 $47,057 $43,335 $21,379 $23,623 $24,433 $23,124 $21,527 $26,458 $27,806 $29,671 $30,111 $31,211 $31,479 $33,222 $35,264 $34,985 $33,212 $25,104 $26,380 $28,368 $27,144 $27,210

2010 $51,180 $48,071 $38,781 $36,370 $18,053 $43,540 $21,153 $32,227 $33,587 $27,229

2011 $52,596 $49,479 $39,725 $36,187 $18,137 $45,205 $21,089 $32,448 $33,678 $27,223

2012 $54,579 $51,169 $40,831 $37,023 $18,366 $47,031 $21,884 $31,738 $35,030 $27,353

2013 $55,870 $52,717 $41,459 $38,187 $18,475 $47,632 $22,275 $32,601 $35,534 $27,957

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [7] Name of Geography Geo Name geo_name GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

PERCENT CHANGE IN INFLATION-ADJUSTED GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

Inflation-Adjusted Inflation-Adjusted Percent Inflation-Adjusted Change Percent Inflation-Adjusted inChange Gross Percent Inflation-Adjusted Domestic in Gross Change Percent Domestic Product Inflation-Adjusted in Gross Change Percent 2002 Product Domestic Inflation-Adjusted in Gross Change Percent 2003 Product Domestic Inflation-Adjusted in Gross Change Percent 2004 Product Domestic Inflation-Adjusted in Gross Change Percent 2005 Product Domestic Inflation-Adjusted in Gross Change Percent 2006 Inflation-Adjusted Product Domestic in Gross Change Percent 2007 Inflation-Adjusted Product Domestic in Change Gross Percent 2008 Inflation-Adjusted Product Domestic inChange Gross Percent 2009 Product Domestic in Change Gross Percent 2010 Dom Pro inC Pct Chg Real Pct Chg GDPReal 2002 PctGDP Chg 2003 Real PctGDP Chg 2004 Real PctGDP Chg 2005 Real PctGDP Chg 2006 Real PctGDP Chg 2007 Real PctGDP Chg 2008 Real PctGDP Chg 2009 Real PctGDP Chg 2010 Real Pct Chg GDPReal 2011 Pct GDP Chg Real 2012 Pct Chg GDPReal 2013GDP 2014 pct-chg_real-gdp_2002 pct-chg_real-gdp_2003 pct-chg_real-gdp_2004 pct-chg_real-gdp_2005 pct-chg_real-gdp_2006 pct-chg_real-gdp_2007 pct-chg_real-gdp_2008 pct-chg_real-gdp_2009 pct-chg_real-gdp_2010 pct-chg_real-gdp_2011 pct-chg_real-gdp_2012 pct-chg_real-gdp_2013 pct-chg_real-gdp_2014

2002 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.9% 6.1% 3.5% 3.2% -0.2% -0.5% 12.0%

2003 2.5% 2.6% 5.7% 4.4% 7.1% 5.9% 6.6% 3.1% 6.1% 1.0%

2004 3.5% 3.5% 3.6% 2.9% 4.1% 3.7% 4.1% 3.8% 1.8% 9.6%

2005 3.4% 3.2% 7.8% 5.0% 8.1% 8.1% 10.4% 6.9% 5.8% 5.2%

2006 2.7% 2.7% 5.8% 7.7% 9.6% 6.2% 10.0% 2.4% 4.1% 5.1%

2007 1.6% 1.5% 2.7% 8.2% 0.5% 2.4% 1.7% 3.4% 4.6% 3.4%

2008 -0.7% -0.5% -2.8% -2.4% -8.1% -3.0% -6.9% 0.1% -1.5% -4.8%

2009 -2.8% -2.7% -8.2% -6.0% -9.6% -8.8% -9.5% 2.9% -6.9% 1.8%

2010 2.1% 2.2% 1.1% 0.9% -0.4% 0.9% -4.1% 2.4% 0.6% -1.3%

2011 1.5% 1.4% 1.7% -1.6% -0.3% 3.5% -1.9% -0.7% -0.5% -2.1%

2012 2.6% 2.1% 2.0% 1.6% -0.2% 3.6% 2.8% -3.9% 2.6% -1.2%

2013 2014 1.7% 1.9% 2.2% 0.8% 1.4% 2.1% -0.7% 1.2% 2.2% -1.3% 0.3% -1.1%

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [8] GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

TOTAL EMPLOYMENT 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 145,817,140 148,998,501 152,270,084 155,680,907 155,595,362 150,938,617 169,036,700 172,557,400 176,123,600 179,885,700 179,645,900 174,243,700 3,063,915 3,238,928 3,401,000 3,494,179 3,433,410 3,262,543 77,953 80,212 82,928 86,446 85,290 82,623 66,452 71,384 75,016 75,035 69,776 64,405 2,112,466 2,249,814 2,367,648 2,427,391 2,396,528 2,269,054 80,342 85,630 91,724 94,931 89,016 83,447 55,197 57,420 58,680 60,633 59,013 58,417 469,406 485,364 507,497 523,757 510,722 491,337 77,576 79,812 82,816 84,134 83,426 80,103

2010 2011 149,869,992 152,881,208 173,044,700 176,286,700 3,205,898 3,265,071 82,751 81,983 62,857 62,840 2,226,412 2,284,214 80,750 80,197 58,035 57,732 483,900 484,922 79,716 81,038

2012 155,282,327 178,846,000 3,320,845 82,723 61,887 2,330,285 81,485 56,477 491,490 82,414

2013 158,497,018 182,278,200 3,391,722 84,725 62,859 2,390,417 83,113 55,060 496,611 83,137

HOVER FOR DETAIL ON SAVING DATA [9] GEO_NAME

U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

TOTAL POPULATION 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 247,510,633 250,039,935 252,641,624 255,300,617 257,996,520 260,573,371 263,025,749 265,289,617 267,628,293 269,911,242 292,805,298 295,516,599 298,379,912 301,231,207 304,093,966 306,771,529 309,326,295 311,582,564 313,873,685 316,128,839 5,652,404 5,839,077 6,029,141 6,167,681 6,280,362 6,343,154 6,408,790 6,468,796 6,551,149 6,626,624 125,117 127,025 128,695 130,442 131,853 133,477 133,929 134,166 135,862 136,539 180,521 188,773 196,168 199,760 200,078 199,696 200,134 202,399 203,142 203,030 3,637,332 3,774,696 3,914,212 4,018,128 4,106,372 4,153,609 4,208,770 4,252,671 4,327,632 4,398,762 187,822 195,424 204,082 208,773 211,211 211,172 210,137 210,867 212,530 215,133 123,234 125,786 127,241 128,206 129,023 130,081 131,412 132,488 131,735 129,473 901,342 920,298 940,930 955,869 967,778 975,580 982,018 987,910 992,395 996,554 172,824 178,816 183,848 187,357 191,202 193,714 196,630 201,850 201,733 201,201

chart-main-title Gross Domestic Product in Arizona and the United States, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP chart-axis-header 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 United States 1.5% -0.2% 3.0% 2.0% 4.6% 3.4% 4.4% 5.2% 4.3% 4.7% 3.9% 0.9% 1.8% 2.6% 3.5% 3.2% 2.7% 1.5% -0.5% -2.7% 2.2% 1.4% Arizona 0.8% 0.4% 10.2% 5.1% 9.7% 7.6% 7.9% 7.0% 8.5% 8.6% 5.2% 2.2% 2.7% 5.7% 3.6% 7.8% 5.8% 2.7% -2.8% -8.2% 1.1% 1.7% chart-title Gross Domestic Product Per Employee in Arizona and the United States, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP Per Employee United States -0.1% 0.4% 2.6% 0.1% 2.1% 0.8% 2.2% 2.9% 1.7% 2.7% 1.5% 0.8% 2.0% 2.0% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% -0.7% -0.4% 0.3% 2.9% -0.5% Arizona -0.8% 0.0% 8.9% 0.7% 3.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 3.7% 5.2% 1.5% 0.6% 1.9% 3.0% -0.8% 2.0% 0.8% 0.0% -1.0% -3.3% 2.9% -0.1% chart-title Gross Domestic Product Per Capita in Arizona and the United States, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP Per Capita United States 0.4% -1.5% 1.6% 0.7% 3.3% 2.2% 3.2% 4.0% 3.1% 3.5% 2.8% -0.1% 0.8% 1.7% 2.6% 2.2% 1.7% 0.5% -1.5% -3.5% 1.3% 0.7% Arizona -0.9% -2.4% 6.6% 1.3% 5.0% 3.1% 4.3% 3.6% 5.2% 5.6% 2.4% 0.0% 0.3% 3.5% 1.0% 4.3% 2.5% 0.4% -4.5% -9.1% 0.1% 0.8%

2012 2.1% 2.0%

2013 1.9% 0.8%

0.6% 0.3%

0.0% -1.3%

1.3% 0.7%

1.1% -0.3%

2014 2.2% 1.4%

chart-main-title chart-axis-header U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma chart-title U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma chart-title U.S. Metros United States Arizona Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

Gross Domestic Product, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1.8% 2.5% 3.5% 3.4% 2.7% 1.6% -0.7% -2.8% 2.1% 1.5% 1.8% 2.6% 3.5% 3.2% 2.7% 1.5% -0.5% -2.7% 2.2% 1.4% 2.7% 5.7% 3.6% 7.8% 5.8% 2.7% -2.8% -8.2% 1.1% 1.7% 3.9% 4.4% 2.9% 5.0% 7.7% 8.2% -2.4% -6.0% 0.9% -1.6% 6.1% 7.1% 4.1% 8.1% 9.6% 0.5% -8.1% -9.6% -0.4% -0.3% 3.5% 5.9% 3.7% 8.1% 6.2% 2.4% -3.0% -8.8% 0.9% 3.5% 3.2% 6.6% 4.1% 10.4% 10.0% 1.7% -6.9% -9.5% -4.1% -1.9% -0.2% 3.1% 3.8% 6.9% 2.4% 3.4% 0.1% 2.9% 2.4% -0.7% -0.5% 6.1% 1.8% 5.8% 4.1% 4.6% -1.5% -6.9% 0.6% -0.5% 12.0% 1.0% 9.6% 5.2% 5.1% 3.4% -4.8% 1.8% -1.3% -2.1% Gross Domestic Product Per Employee, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP Per Employee 2.0% 1.9% 1.5% 1.2% 0.5% -0.6% -0.6% 0.2% 2.8% -0.5% 2.0% 2.0% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% -0.7% -0.4% 0.3% 2.9% -0.5% 1.9% 3.0% -0.8% 2.0% 0.8% 0.0% -1.0% -3.3% 2.9% -0.1% 2.4% 1.0% -2.7% 2.0% 4.2% 3.8% -1.1% -2.9% 0.7% -0.6% 2.1% 0.7% -2.5% 0.7% 4.3% 0.5% -1.2% -2.1% 2.0% -0.3% 2.8% 3.3% -0.6% 1.5% 0.9% -0.2% -1.7% -3.7% 2.9% 0.9% 0.2% 3.2% -1.4% 3.6% 2.7% -1.7% -0.7% -3.4% -0.9% -1.3% 0.2% -0.7% 0.4% 2.7% 0.2% 0.1% 2.8% 3.9% 3.1% -0.2% -0.5% 4.3% -2.4% 2.3% -0.4% 1.3% 1.0% -3.2% 2.1% -0.7% 8.9% -1.3% 4.5% 2.2% 1.3% 1.8% -4.0% 6.0% -0.8% -3.7% Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change | GDP Per Capita 0.8% 1.5% 2.4% 2.3% 1.7% 0.5% -1.7% -3.7% 1.2% 0.7% 0.8% 1.7% 2.6% 2.2% 1.7% 0.5% -1.5% -3.5% 1.3% 0.7% 0.3% 3.5% 1.0% 4.3% 2.5% 0.4% -4.5% -9.1% 0.1% 0.8% 1.3% 3.0% 1.1% 3.4% 6.3% 6.8% -3.4% -7.1% 0.5% -1.7% 2.4% 3.1% -0.4% 3.4% 5.5% -1.3% -8.3% -9.4% -0.6% -1.4% 0.8% 3.4% 0.9% 4.2% 2.4% -0.3% -5.0% -9.8% -0.4% 2.4% 0.5% 3.9% 0.9% 6.1% 5.4% -0.6% -7.9% -9.5% -3.7% -2.3% -1.1% 2.4% 1.7% 4.7% 1.3% 2.6% -0.6% 2.1% 1.4% -1.6% -2.2% 4.8% 0.1% 3.6% 1.8% 2.9% -2.7% -7.6% -0.1% -1.1% 10.3% -0.5% 6.5% 1.6% 2.3% 1.4% -6.8% 0.4% -2.7% -4.7%

2012 2.6% 2.1% 2.0% 1.6% -0.2% 3.6% 2.8% -3.9% 2.6% -1.2%

2013 1.7% 1.9% 0.8% 2.1% -0.7% 1.2% 2.2% -1.3% 0.3% -1.1%

1.0% 0.6% 0.3% 0.7% 1.3% 1.5% 1.2% -1.7% 1.2% -2.9%

-0.4% 0.0% -1.3% -0.3% -2.2% -1.3% 0.2% 1.3% -0.7% -1.9%

1.7% 1.3% 0.7% 0.3% -0.6% 1.8% 2.0% -3.3% 2.1% -1.2%

0.8% 1.1% -0.3% 1.6% -0.6% -0.4% 0.9% 0.4% -0.1% -0.8%

2014 2.2% 1.4%

chart-main-title chart-axis-header United States Arizona U.S. Metros Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma chart-title United States Arizona U.S. Metros Metro Flagstaff Metro Lake Havasu City Metro Phoenix Metro Prescott Metro Sierra Vista Metro Tucson Metro Yuma

Gross Domestic Product Per Employee, 2013 | GDP Per Employee 2013 91427.36213 81001.33207 95143.24112 61540.27737 59673.23693 87651.23407 57656.44364 76661.82347 71307.32102 67659.40556 Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, 2013 | GDP Per Capita 52716.52866 41459.12006 55869.92186 38186.89166 18475.1022 47632.26562 22274.59293 32601.3918 35534.45172 27957.11751

Gross Domestic Product Per Employee as a Percentage of the U.S. Metro Average, 2013 | GDP P chart-main-title chart-axis-header 2013 Metro Flagstaff 64.7% Metro Lake Havasu City 62.7% Metro Phoenix 92.1% Metro Prescott 60.6% Metro Sierra Vista 80.6% Metro Tucson 74.9% Metro Yuma 71.1% chart-title Gross Domestic Product Per Capita as a Percentage of the U.S. Metro Average, 2013 | GDP Per C Metro Flagstaff 68.3% Metro Lake Havasu City 33.1% Metro Phoenix 85.3% Metro Prescott 39.9% Metro Sierra Vista 58.4% Metro Tucson 63.6% Metro Yuma 50.0%

chart-main-title Gross Domestic Product Per Employee in Arizona as a Percentage of the National Average | GDP Per Employee chart-axis-header 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Arizona 103.6% 104.6% 104.0% 100.9% 99.2% 99.0% 99.0% 100.8% 100.7% 98.1% 96.7% 96.8% 95.9% 93.8% 95.6% 94.8% 93.6% 92.4% 91.3% 90.8% 96.2% 96.7% 97.8% 98.6% 97.6% 96.6% 96.5% 97.4% 96.1% 95.2% 95.1% 95.2% 92.5% 92.9% 93.2% 93.8% 92.7% 90.7% 90.2% 90.0% 89.7% 88.6% chart-title Gross Domestic Product Per Capita in Arizona as a Percentage of the National Average | GDP Per Capita Arizona 97.2% 97.7% 95.2% 89.9% 88.3% 89.4% 91.5% 94.0% 94.1% 91.5% 89.4% 90.9% 92.0% 91.8% 93.4% 91.0% 88.9% 86.2% 84.7% 83.8% 87.8% 88.3% 90.0% 90.5% 90.6% 89.8% 89.8% 90.3% 88.8% 88.3% 87.8% 88.6% 86.8% 88.2% 89.1% 89.0% 85.8% 82.1% 80.7% 80.3% 79.8% 78.6%

LastUpdate SourceLine SourceURL Dataset Description

12/18/14 U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/regional/index.htm

Gross domestic product (GDP) per employee is the broadest proxy for productivity for states and local areas. It is calculated by dividing GDP by total employment. Gross domestic product is the most comprehensive measure of economic activity. Data are provided on the Innovation Indicators dashboard for 1997 through 2006 for the state and the nation. Data prior to 1997 are available for the state and the nation, but a break in series in 1997 for the state data complicates the presentation of these data. The only data available by metropolitan area are for 2001 through 2005; county data are not available. GDP for the nation, states and metro areas are presented in both current dollars and inflation-adjusted dollars (though some of the historical data by state are available only in current dollars). The inflation adjustment is unique to each geographic area. Total employment includes an estimate of the number of proprietors as well as wage and salary employment. Gross Domestic Product Per Employee for the state and nation are presented in the dashboard in current and inflation-adjusted dollars from 1997 through 2006. The annual inflation-adjusted percent change and the current-dollar percentage of the national average also are displayed. The same data are shown for 2001 through 2005 for the metro areas. Technical Notes

Notes on Visual#1-1

Notes on Visual#1-2

Notes on Visual#1-1

Notes on Visual#1-2

Notes on Visual#1-3

Notes on Visual#2-1

Notes on Visual#2-2

Notes on Visual#2-3

Notes on Visual#3-1

Notes on Visual#3-2

Notes on Visual#4-1

Notes on Visual#4-2

GDP by metro area are prototype statistics that first were released in September 2007 for evaluation and comment by data users. The methodology developed for these prototype estimates is relatively simple. The employment figures are estimates. The primary source is the Census of Employment and Wages, but the BEA must estimate employment for those not counted in the census. A healthy economy exists when inflation-adjusted gains in GDP are at least 2-to-3 percent per year. During the 1991-to-2001 economic cycle, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate was 7.5 percent in Arizona and 3.7 percent nationally. However, during the 2001-to-2009 economic cycle, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate was only 2.9 percent in Arizona and 1.6 percent nationally. Within an economic cycle, the annual change in GDP is highly variable, exceeding the target during economic expansions and falling short during recessions. During expansions, Arizona’s GDP growth is much higher than the target and the national average due to the state’s much more rapid population growth. However, during recessions—as in 2008 and 2009—Arizona’s economic performance is inferior to the national average. In Arizona, the percent change in GDP during economic expansions has dropped over time, a natural result of the considerable increase in the size of the Arizona economy. During expansions, inflation-adjusted GDP growth in Arizona’s metropolitan areas generally is much higher than the target of 2-to-3 percent and also is higher than the U.S. metro average due to the above-average population growth in Arizona. Between the end of the prior recession in 2001 and the peak of the economic cycle in 2007, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate ranged between 5.0 and 5.7 percent across five of the state’s metropolitan areas—Tucson was lower at 3.2 percent. The U.S. metro average was 2.5 percent. Variations in population growth account for some of the differences across metro areas in aggregate economic growth. The most recent data for GDP by metro area are for 2009, a recessionary year. These estimates remain subject to revision. The preliminary data indicate that the percent change in inflation-adjusted GDP was negative in both 2008 and 2009 in each of the geographic areas. For the entire economic cycle, real GDP growth averaged between 1.9 percent and 3.0 percent across Arizona’s six metro areas, higher than the U.S. metro average of 1.5 percent. A healthy economy exists when inflation-adjusted gains in GDP are at least 2-to-3 percent per year. During the 1991-to-2001 economic cycle, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate was 7.5 percent in Arizona and 3.7 percent nationally. However, during the 2001-to-2009 economic cycle, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate was only 2.9 percent in Arizona and 1.6 percent nationally. Within an economic cycle, the annual change in GDP is highly variable, exceeding the target during economic expansions and falling short during recessions. During expansions, Arizona’s GDP growth is much higher than the target and the national average due to the state’s much more rapid population growth. However, during recessions—as in 2008 and 2009—Arizona’s economic performance is inferior to the national average. In Arizona, the percent change in GDP during economic expansions has dropped over time, a natural result of the considerable increase in the size of the Arizona economy. Reasonable targets for Arizona are for the state’s GDP per employee, a measure of productivity, to be near the national average and for the larger metro areas to have a figure near the U.S. metro average. The most recent data for GDP per employee by metro area are for 2009, a recessionary year. These estimates remain subject to revision. The preliminary data indicate that GDP per employee was less than the U.S. metro average in five of Arizona’s six metro areas, with only the Phoenix area’s figure above average. A reasonable target is for GDP per capita, a measure of economic well-being, to be within 5 percent of the national average in Arizona and within 5 percent of the U.S. metro average in the state’s larger metro areas. The most recent data for GDP per capita by metro area are for 2009, a recessionary year. These estimates remain subject to revision. The preliminary data indicate that GDP per capita was considerably less than the metro average in each of Arizona’s six metro areas. During expansions, inflation-adjusted GDP growth in Arizona’s metropolitan areas generally is much higher than the target of 2-to-3 percent and also is higher than the U.S. metro average due to the above-average population growth in Arizona. Between the end of the prior recession in 2001 and the peak of the economic cycle in 2007, the annual average inflation-adjusted growth rate ranged between 5.0 and 5.7 percent across five of the state’s metropolitan areas—Tucson was lower at 3.2 percent. The U.S. metro average was 2.5 percent. Variations in population growth account for some of the differences across metro areas in aggregate economic growth. The most recent data for GDP by metro area are for 2009, a recessionary year. These estimates remain subject to revision. The preliminary data indicate that the percent change in inflation-adjusted GDP was negative in both 2008 and 2009 in each of the geographic areas. For the entire economic cycle, real GDP growth averaged between 1.9 percent and 3.0 percent across Arizona’s six metro areas, higher than the U.S. metro average of 1.5 percent. GDP per employee, a measure of productivity, was marginally higher than the national metropolitan average in Metro Phoenix in 2009. In each of the other five metro areas in Arizona, GDP per employee was at least 22 percent below the U.S. metro average. A number of factors account for the geographic variation, with the industrial mix being the largest factor. In 2009, GDP per capita was 11 percent lower than the national metropolitan average in Metro Phoenix, 24 percent below average in Flagstaff and at least 35 percent below average in each of the other four metro areas. The substantial variation in GDP per capita across the metro areas is a result of such factors as industrial mix, household size, and the number of workers per household. A reasonable target is for Arizona’s GDP per employee to be near the national average. This has generally been the case historically. The percentage of the U.S. average was never below 99 from 1969 through 1980. Since 1992, the percentage has fluctuated from 95 to 99 percent of the national average. Arizona’s GDP per employee percentage rose to 98.1 in 2009, the highest figure since 1995. A reasonable target is for Arizona’s GDP per capita to be within 5 percent of the national average. This was the case from 1970 through 1974. The percentage of the national average generally exceeded 90 through 1987, but has been below 90 in each year since 2000. Arizona’s GDP per capita as a percentage of the U.S. average fell to 84.3 in 2009, the second-lowest figure since 1969. The annual inflation-adjusted percent change in GDP per employee typically ranges from slightly negative to 2 percent nationally, with the range broader in Arizona. The change in Arizona varies by year from less-to-more than the national average, though Arizona’s gain was higher in each year from 2005 through 2009. Nationally, the annual percent change in GDP per capita is cyclical, with decreases or small gains during economic recessions and increases in excess of 2 percent during strong economic expansions. The percent change in Arizona varies from less than the national average during recessions to more than the U.S. average during expansions. Arizona’s figure was below average in each year from 2007 through 2009.

Notes on Visual#5-1

Notes on Visual#5-2

Annual inflation-adjusted percent changes in GDP per employee in Arizona’s metro areas were erratic from 2002 to 2009, with declines common in each metro area though the losses in Metro Phoenix have been marginal. In these eight years, the Phoenix and Yuma areas had the strongest performance with an annual average increase of 1.3 percent, above the U.S. metro area average of 0.9 percent. The annual average for Flagstaff matched the U.S. metro average, but Lake Havasu and Prescott had slight negative averages. During the strong economic expansion from 2003 through 2006, the annual inflation-adjusted percent change in GDP per capita generally was positive in Arizona and in each of Arizona’s metro areas. In the recessionary years of 2008 and 2009, every metro posted a loss. Between 2001 and 2009, the annual average increase exceeded the national metropolitan average of 0.5 percent only in the Flagstaff metro area. The annual average for Lake Havasu City, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson was negative.

Based on SIC (1997 Base)

Based on NAICS (2005 Base)

1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Nominal GDP in Millions Real GDP in Millions of of Dollars Dollars United United States Arizona States Arizona 962,902 7,563 1,012,299 8,569 1,097,173 9,649 1,210,292 11,292 1,356,500 13,330 1,472,024 14,611 1,602,228 15,284 1,780,497 16,970 1,986,408 19,609 2,243,230 23,279 2,489,416 27,495 2,713,933 30,764 3,057,318 34,269 3,211,370 35,794 3,445,372 39,774 3,853,668 46,135 4,126,664 50,709 4,340,813 55,881 4,649,020 60,047 6,076,695 76,600 5,053,003 64,945 6,398,624 80,258 5,366,080 67,895 6,540,047 80,971 5,651,747 70,632 6,638,210 81,606 5,842,665 73,358 6,627,809 81,946 6,167,644 82,682 6,828,525 90,282 6,467,698 89,300 6,967,716 94,916 6,912,844 100,374 7,288,327 104,104 7,299,372 109,906 7,539,096 112,019 7,749,965 119,530 7,871,721 120,869 8,284,432 129,279 8,284,432 129,279 8,270,462 128,099 9,847,068 141,718 8,727,023 139,289 10,275,885 155,020 9,286,858 151,188 10,767,451 168,321 9,884,171 161,901 11,223,130 179,260 10,218,019 170,174 11,364,239 185,979 10,572,388 177,106 11,560,341 190,389 11,067,759 189,139 11,807,823 200,110 11,788,909 201,287 12,212,645 207,587 12,554,538 222,968 12,554,538 222,968 13,310,937 246,837 12,895,854 239,013 13,969,323 260,122 13,143,678 244,906 14,270,462 260,454 13,100,045 240,571 14,014,849 249,711 12,773,853 226,795 14,551,782 253,609 13,099,722 228,486

Total Employment United States Arizona 91,053,200 711,344 91,277,600 746,653 91,581,400 785,731 94,312,200 849,706 98,427,500 924,890 100,111,800 955,104 98,900,600 935,070 101,591,200 976,118 105,042,200 1,047,500 109,686,600 1,149,617 113,147,100 1,240,161 113,983,200 1,282,615 114,914,000 1,312,566 114,163,300 1,315,333 115,645,700 1,378,623 120,528,100 1,504,336 123,796,700 1,621,750 126,232,300 1,700,594 129,548,400 1,764,638 133,563,900 1,833,198 136,177,800 1,864,934 138,330,900 1,894,104 137,612,800 1,902,691 138,166,100 1,925,190 140,774,400 2,010,588 144,196,600 2,141,302 147,915,800 2,257,829 151,056,200 2,387,542 154,541,200 2,497,166 154,541,200 2,497,166 158,481,200 2,610,870 161,531,300 2,696,787 165,370,800 2,795,770 165,510,200 2,823,452 165,063,100 2,841,538 166,019,500 2,914,131 169,026,700 3,039,930 172,551,400 3,208,243 176,124,600 3,369,783 179,887,700 3,454,540 179,608,200 3,392,729 173,814,200 3,209,925

Nominal GDP Per Employee United States Arizona 10,575 10,632 11,090 11,477 11,980 12,280 12,833 13,289 13,782 14,413 14,704 15,298 16,200 16,345 17,526 17,385 18,911 18,720 20,451 20,249 22,002 22,171 23,810 23,985 26,605 26,108 28,130 27,213 29,792 28,851 31,973 30,668 33,334 31,268 34,387 32,860 35,886 34,028 37,832 35,427 39,405 36,406 40,857 37,290 42,457 38,555 44,639 42,947 45,944 44,415 47,940 46,875 49,348 48,678 51,305 50,064 53,607 51,770 53,516 51,298 55,067 53,350 57,493 56,062 59,770 57,909 61,736 60,272 64,051 62,328 66,665 64,904 69,746 66,214 72,758 69,498 75,577 73,250 77,656 75,299 79,453 76,768 80,631 77,793

Real GDP Per Employee United States Arizona

46,907 47,907 48,026 47,988 48,163 49,423 49,496 50,544 50,969 52,111 53,607 63,718 64,840 66,659 67,866 68,662 70,036 71,123 72,253 72,758 73,220 73,066 72,937 73,491

43,408 43,780 43,418 43,084 43,068 46,895 47,208 48,617 49,614 50,625 51,770 56,752 59,375 62,415 64,118 65,869 67,002 68,669 68,287 69,498 70,928 70,894 70,908 70,654

Nominal GDP Per Employee as a Percentage of the National Average Arizona 1.005 1.035 1.025 1.036 1.046 1.040 1.009 0.992 0.990 0.990 1.008 1.007 0.981 0.967 0.968 0.959 0.938 0.956 0.948 0.936 0.924 0.913 0.908 0.962 0.967 0.978 0.986 0.976 0.966 0.959 0.969 0.975 0.969 0.976 0.973 0.974 0.949 0.955 0.969 0.970 0.966 0.965

Real GDP Per Employee, Percent Change United States Arizona

0.021 0.002 -0.001 0.004 0.026 0.001 0.021 0.008 0.022 0.029

0.009 -0.008 -0.008 0.000 0.089 0.007 0.030 0.020 0.020 0.023

0.018 0.028 0.018 0.012 0.020 0.016 0.016 0.007 0.006 -0.002 -0.002 0.008

0.046 0.051 0.027 0.027 0.017 0.025 -0.006 0.018 0.021 0.000 0.000 -0.004

Note: GDP for 1997 was calculated twice, one based on the Standard Industrial Classification, the other based on the North American Industry Classification System. The two estimates of nominal GDP for 1997 are somewhat different. The real dollars are more different due to the varying base periods used. Because of this discontinuity in the time series, the real percent change for 1997 cannot be calculated by comparing the 1997 NAICS figure to the 1996 SIC figure, nor can the 1998 data by NAICS be compared to the 1997 data by SIC.

Population United States Arizona 201,298,000 1,737,000 203,798,722 1,794,912 206,817,509 1,896,108 209,274,882 2,008,847 211,349,205 2,125,281 213,333,635 2,224,342 215,456,585 2,286,348 217,553,859 2,347,976 219,760,875 2,427,310 222,098,244 2,517,852 224,568,579 2,638,582 227,224,719 2,737,774 229,465,744 2,810,108 231,664,432 2,889,860 233,792,014 2,968,924 235,824,907 3,067,134 237,923,734 3,183,539 240,132,831 3,308,261 242,288,936 3,437,103 244,499,004 3,535,183 246,819,222 3,622,184 249,622,814 3,684,097 252,980,941 3,788,576 256,514,224 3,915,740 259,918,588 4,065,440 263,125,821 4,245,089 266,278,393 4,432,499 269,394,284 4,586,940 272,646,925 4,736,990 272,646,925 4,736,990 275,854,104 4,883,342 279,040,168 5,023,823 282,165,844 5,167,000 285,049,647 5,304,000 287,745,630 5,445,000 290,242,027 5,582,000 292,936,109 5,744,000 295,618,454 5,945,000 298,431,771 6,147,000 301,393,632 6,305,000 304,177,401 6,405,000 306,656,290 6,432,000 309,050,816 6,392,000

Nominal GDP Per Capita United States Arizona 4,783 4,354 4,967 4,774 5,305 5,089 5,783 5,621 6,418 6,272 6,900 6,569 7,436 6,685 8,184 7,228 9,039 8,078 10,100 9,246 11,085 10,420 11,944 11,237 13,324 12,195 13,862 12,386 14,737 13,397 16,341 15,042 17,344 15,928 18,077 16,891 19,188 17,470 20,667 18,371 21,741 18,744 22,641 19,172 23,095 19,363 24,044 21,115 24,884 21,966 26,272 23,645 27,413 24,795 28,768 26,059 30,385 27,291 30,334 27,042 31,636 28,523 33,281 30,094 35,030 31,334 35,846 32,084 36,742 32,526 38,133 33,884 40,244 35,043 42,469 37,505 44,603 40,156 46,349 41,256 46,915 40,664 45,702 38,823 47,085 39,676

Real GDP Per Capita United States Arizona

25,080 26,170 26,497 26,593 26,199 26,620 26,807 27,699 28,313 29,220 30,385 36,117 37,251 38,587 39,775 39,868 40,176 40,683 41,690 42,469 43,212 43,610 43,067 41,655 42,387

22,286 22,703 22,354 22,151 21,630 23,056 23,347 24,523 25,272 26,351 27,291 29,917 31,745 33,505 34,693 35,064 34,966 35,849 36,140 37,505 38,883 38,843 37,560 35,260 35,746

Nominal GDP Per Capita as a Percentage of the National Average Arizona 0.910 0.961 0.959 0.972 0.977 0.952 0.899 0.883 0.894 0.915 0.940 0.941 0.915 0.894 0.909 0.920 0.918 0.934 0.910 0.889 0.862 0.847 0.838 0.878 0.883 0.900 0.905 0.906 0.898 0.902 0.904 0.894 0.895 0.885 0.889 0.871 0.883 0.900 0.890 0.867 0.849 0.843

Real GDP Per Capita, Percent Change United States Arizona

0.043 0.012 0.004 -0.015 0.016 0.007 0.033 0.022 0.032 0.040

0.019 -0.015 -0.009 -0.024 0.066 0.013 0.050 0.031 0.043 0.036

0.031 0.036 0.031 0.002 0.008 0.013 0.025 0.019 0.018 0.009 -0.012 -0.033 0.018

0.061 0.055 0.035 0.011 -0.003 0.025 0.008 0.038 0.037 -0.001 -0.033 -0.061 0.014

Nominal GDP in Millions of Dollars

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

U.S. Metros 9,174,804 9,495,611 9,928,800 10,573,301 11,278,656 11,970,693 12,566,572 12,825,351 12,604,487 13,071,502

Metro Flagstaff 2,980 3,167 3,375 3,573 3,903 4,366 4,782 4,777 4,612 4,683

Metro Lake Havasu City 2,433 2,621 2,855 3,028 3,413 3,914 3,986 3,796 3,518 3,595

Metro Phoenix 128,404 134,117 143,055 152,305 168,890 187,243 196,594 196,311 188,154 190,601

Metro Prescott 2,907 3,059 3,312 3,515 4,058 4,695 4,858 4,743 4,415 4,452

Real GDP in Millions of 2005 Dollars

Metro Tucson 22,635 22,806 24,571 25,767 28,222 30,673 32,787 33,215 31,923 32,324

Metro Yuma 3,057 3,462 3,618 4,164 4,365 4,692 5,093 4,992 4,963 5,034

U.S. Metros 10,190,935 10,367,348 10,582,308 10,956,280 11,278,656 11,600,878 11,839,160 11,796,552 11,503,904 11,794,809

Metro Flagstaff 3,381 3,497 3,622 3,703 3,903 4,216 4,465 4,353 4,085 4,107

Metro Lake Havasu City 2,765 2,914 3,088 3,155 3,413 3,756 3,712 3,456 3,129 3,164

Metro Phoenix 138,780 142,852 150,486 156,687 168,890 181,763 186,087 182,686 172,172 173,371

Metro Prescott 3,352 3,448 3,634 3,701 4,058 4,486 4,465 4,232 3,895 3,877

Population

Metro Tucson 25,152 24,798 26,155 26,698 28,222 29,568 30,647 30,408 28,511 28,558

Metro Yuma 3,425 3,847 3,856 4,211 4,365 4,564 4,678 4,475 4,463 4,417

U.S. Metros 236,676,043 239,294,518 241,701,589 244,265,260 246,815,061 249,393,724 252,180,631 254,812,528 257,355,190 258,874,726

Metro Flagstaff 118,283 121,308 122,882 125,117 127,025 128,695 130,442 131,853 133,477 134,606

Metro Lake Havasu City 160,312 166,155 172,633 180,521 188,773 196,168 199,760 200,078 199,696 201,567

Metro Phoenix 3,363,736 3,452,470 3,536,388 3,637,332 3,774,696 3,914,212 4,018,128 4,106,372 4,153,609 4,209,070

Nominal GDP Per Capita

Metro Prescott 172,636 177,362 182,090 187,822 195,424 204,082 208,773 211,211 211,172 211,144

Metro Tucson 859,280 874,267 885,893 901,342 920,298 940,930 955,869 967,778 975,580 982,108

Metro Yuma 162,873 165,398 168,003 172,824 178,816 183,848 187,357 191,202 193,714 196,830

U.S. Metros 38,765 39,682 41,079 43,286 45,697 47,999 49,832 50,332 48,977 50,494

Metro Flagstaff 25,194 26,107 27,465 28,557 30,726 33,925 36,660 36,230 34,553 34,790

Metro Lake Havasu City 15,177 15,774 16,538 16,774 18,080 19,952 19,954 18,973 17,617 17,835

Metro Phoenix 38,173 38,847 40,452 41,873 44,743 47,837 48,927 47,806 45,299 45,283

Metro Prescott 16,839 17,247 18,189 18,715 20,765 23,005 23,269 22,456 20,907 21,085

Nominal GDP Per Capita as a Percentage of the U.S. Metropolitan Average

Real GDP Per Capita

Metro Tucson 26,342 26,086 27,736 28,587 30,666 32,599 34,301 34,321 32,722 32,913

Metro Yuma 18,769 20,931 21,535 24,094 24,411 25,521 27,183 26,109 25,620 25,575

U.S. Metros 43,059 43,325 43,783 44,854 45,697 46,516 46,947 46,295 44,700 45,562

Metro Flagstaff 28,584 28,827 29,475 29,596 30,726 32,760 34,230 33,014 30,605 30,511

Metro Lake Havasu City 17,248 17,538 17,888 17,477 18,080 19,147 18,582 17,273 15,669 15,697

Metro Phoenix 41,258 41,377 42,554 43,077 44,743 46,437 46,312 44,488 41,451 41,190

Metro Prescott 19,417 19,440 19,957 19,705 20,765 21,981 21,387 20,037 18,445 18,362

Metro Tucson 29,271 28,364 29,524 29,620 30,666 31,424 32,062 31,420 29,225 29,078

Metro Yuma 21,029 23,259 22,952 24,366 24,411 24,825 24,968 23,405 23,039 22,441

Metro Flagstaff 0.650 0.658 0.669 0.660 0.672 0.707 0.736 0.720 0.705 0.689

Metro Lake Havasu City 0.392 0.398 0.403 0.388 0.396 0.416 0.400 0.377 0.360 0.353

Metro Phoenix 0.985 0.979 0.985 0.967 0.979 0.997 0.982 0.950 0.925 0.897

Metro Prescott 0.434 0.435 0.443 0.432 0.454 0.479 0.467 0.446 0.427 0.418

Metro Tucson 0.680 0.657 0.675 0.660 0.671 0.679 0.688 0.682 0.668 0.652

Metro Yuma 0.484 0.527 0.524 0.557 0.534 0.532 0.546 0.519 0.523 0.507

Real GDP Per Capita, Percent Change

U.S. Metros

Metro Flagstaff

Metro Lake Havasu City

Metro Phoenix

Metro Prescott

Metro Tucson

Metro Yuma

0.006 0.011 0.024 0.019 0.018 0.009 -0.014 -0.034 0.019

0.009 0.022 0.004 0.038 0.066 0.045 -0.036 -0.073 -0.003

0.017 0.020 -0.023 0.034 0.059 -0.029 -0.070 -0.093 0.002

0.003 0.028 0.012 0.039 0.038 -0.003 -0.039 -0.068 -0.006

0.001 0.027 -0.013 0.054 0.059 -0.027 -0.063 -0.079 -0.004

-0.031 0.041 0.003 0.035 0.025 0.020 -0.020 -0.070 -0.005

0.106 -0.013 0.062 0.002 0.017 0.006 -0.063 -0.016 -0.026

[1] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [2] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [3] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [4] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization.

[4] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [5] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [6] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [7] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable).

the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [8] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation. [9] Guidelines for Reusing Data: Arizona Indicators uses Google Spreadsheets to store raw data in a consistently structured manner that makes it easy to use in a variety of applications. For the greatest user control we recommend that you save the entire workbook in Excel format before importing them into other applications. After a file or worksheet is saved locally --in any format-- you will notice three rows and one column that were hidden from view in Google Spreadsheets. These header rows and key field column provide options for user customization. Header rows of varying lengths are valuable as descriptive text for most database; geographic information system (GIS); and charting & graphing software. The key field --held in the first column-- is useful in most database & GIS software (the Federal Information Processing Standard code for locations is used where applicable). If you do not wish to use the header rows or key column simply remove them before importing into an application or presentation.