Classroom Debate Rubric Criteria

Respect for Other Team

Information

Rebuttal

Use of Facts/Statistics

Organization

Understanding of Topic

5 points

4 points

3 points Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough

Statements, responses and/or body language were borderline appropriate. Some sarcastic remarks

Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful

All information presented in this debate was clear, accurate and thorough

Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not Most information presented in this debate was clear, accurate and thorough

Some information was accurate, but there were some minor inaccuracies

Information had some major inaccuracies OR was usually not clear

All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong

Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong

Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak

Some counter arguments were weak and irrelevant

Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant

Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples

Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples

Some points were supported well, others were not

All points were not supported

All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion The team clearly understood the topic in depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly

Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion The team clearly understood the topic in depth and presented their information with ease

Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease

Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic, but didn’t present with ease

Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic

All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were inappropriate language

2 points

1 point

Total Points: Comments:

Source: http://course1.winona.edu/shatfield/air/classdebate.pdf

Total Points

Oil Sands Debate Rubric - May 2015.pdf

Oil Sands Debate Rubric - May 2015.pdf. Oil Sands Debate Rubric - May 2015.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.

232KB Sizes 1 Downloads 162 Views

Recommend Documents

Speaker Performance Rubric, Orange County Debate League 2014 ...
Page 1 of 2. 2014-2015 SPEAKER PERFORMANCE RUBRIC, ORANGE COUNTY DEBATE LEAGUE. Score & Description Argumentation Refutation Organization Presentation. “(Nearly) Flawless” (95-100). Difficult to identify any error of. omission or commission. Unli

Molten Salt Reactors and the Oil Sands - Computare
Jun 12, 2012 - Major reactor development program at Oak Ridge ... Like all reactor programs, very little done in 1980s and .... MIT Thesis 2006. Integration of ...

Molten Salt Reactors and the Oil Sands - Computare
Jun 12, 2012 - Earliest efforts in support Aircraft. Reactor .... No salt processing, just add small amounts of .... Current Small Modular Reactors either too low.

Rubric:
Instead of using levels, why not assess every assignment and/or project against a consistent rubric. When accompanied by authentic feedback, you will see the ...

Molten Salt Reactors and the Oil Sands: Odd Couple or ... - Computare
Molten Salt Reactors and the Oil Sands: Odd Couple or Key to North American. Energy Independence? June 12th 2012. Presentation to. Canadian Nuclear Society, Western Focus Track. Dr. David LeBlanc. Ottawa Valley Research Associates Ltd d_leblanc@roger

CWRA+ Scoring Rubric
Analysis and Problem Solving. CAE 215 Lexington Avenue, Floor 16, New York, NY 10016 (212) 217-0700 [email protected] cae.org. Making a logical decision ...

Oral Presentation Rubric
You will create and present a 5- to 7-minute oral presentation to the class, using at least one prop. Presentation must ... support theme. □ Uses correct grammar.

Oral Presentation Grading Rubric
Nonverbal Skills. 4 – Exceptional. 3 – Admirable. 2 – Acceptable. 1 – Poor. Eye Contact. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact ...

Board Builder Rubric
best use of space. Student has made the board visually appealing, and ... a degree of creativity and planning. Student has taken little care to make the.

Education and debate
Education and debate. Taking account of future technology in cost effectiveness analysis. Joshua A Salomon ..... 1999;171:189-93. w4 Younossi ZM, Singer ME, ...

arcade rubric reflection.pdf
Sign in. Loading… Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying.

Debate Topics.pdf
... oil exploration in public lands and state. parks. This House is defined as the United States Federal Government. 3. This house would authorize the implementation of the Clean Power Plan. This House is defined as the United Nations. 4. This house

Tronox KZN Sands - Centre for Environmental Rights
Jan 29, 2016 - The fifth respondent, the Member of the Executive Council for ... provincial and national spheres of government. ...... 44 In Fose v Minister of Safety and Security [1997] ZACC 6; 1997 (3) SA 786 (CC); 1997 (7) BCLR 851 (CC) ...

Tronox KZN Sands - Centre for Environmental Rights
Jan 29, 2016 - launched proceedings in the KwaZulu-Natal Division of the High Court, .... The reason behind this strict allocation is that municipalities are best suited to ..... objective constitutional invalidity, see Cross-Border Road Transport.

Rubric 3 - Listening.pdf
Attempts to focus attention on the. speaker;. • Attempts to respond appropriately;. • Attempts to incorporate critical. thinking. Page 1 of 1. Rubric 3 - Listening.pdf.

rubric-Plan-View.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.

Download Destiny of the Sands
High adventure, past and present, merge into a multi-leveled tale of epic proportions in this triumphant sequel to the best-selling novel, Secret Of. The Sands!" ?-

Fish oil-olive oil-soybean oil-triglycerides medium-chain - European ...
European Medicines Agency, 2017. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 26 October 2017. EMA/690754/2017. Human Medicines Evaluation Division. List of nationally authorised medicinal products. Active substance: fish oil / oli

Sands of Sinai, cleveland JCC.pdf
at [email protected] or (216) 593-2851. Jewish Life. and Culture. mandeljcc.org. Page 1 of 1. Sands of Sin ... land JCC.pdf. Sands of Sina ... eland JCC.pdf.

Chip on the Sands Panel.pdf
Mrs. Irecê Fraga Kauss Loureiro. Chief of the Information and Communication Technology Department. National Bank for Economic and Social Development ...