Redwood Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2014-15 School Year Published During 2015-16 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. •

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.



For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.



For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners. Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.

About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year) School Contact Information School Name-------

Redwood Elementary School

Street-------

6900 Lake Earl Drive

City, State, Zip-------

Fort Dick, CA

Phone Number------- 707-464-0360 Principal-------

Theresa Slayton

E-mail Address------- [email protected] Web Site-------

https://sites.google.com/a/delnorte.k12.ca.us/redwood

Grades Served

K-8

CDS Code

08-61820-6005458

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 1 of 15

District Contact Information District Name-------

Del Norte County Unified School District

Phone Number------- 707-464-6141 Superintendent------ Jeff Harris -E-mail Address------- [email protected] Web Site-------

www.delnorte.k12.ca.us

School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year) School Description and Mission Statement Redwood Elementary School is a K-8 community school serving approximately 500 students. We have a diverse population which includes a large Native American population. The cultural background of all students is respected and ethnic studies are incorporated into the school’s curriculum and programs whenever possible. We are very proud to offer Tolowa and Spanish Language classes to our middle school students this year. Redwood’s student population consists of students from a wide range of socio-economic backgrounds. In fact, over 50% of our students are considered Socially Economically Disadvantaged. Redwood staff consists of 1 Principal, 22 teachers, a full time nurse, 3 instructional assistants/noon duty supervisors, 9 special educational instruction assistants, 2 school secretaries (full-time), library assistant, two custodial staff, one SDC and one RSP teacher, 2 part time music teachers,1 P.E. teacher, 1 GATE Facilitator, 2 After School Program Teachers, 2 Speech Therapists and one Speech IA. With a focus on raising student achievement and attendance rates Redwood School is committed to providing engaging California State Standard lessons to all of our students by providing on-going professional development for our teachers. Our Special Education Support Staff collaborates with our regular education teachers to provide appropriate modifications and support that allows all students equal access to the core curriculum in the least restrictive environment. Special tutoring programs include Classroom Buddies, Cross-age tutoring, and our After School Program which offers tutoring and homework support. Our special Student Awards programs include: Student of the Month and numerous classroom student recognition incentives. Students are also recognized in a monthly assembly for Responsible Student Club, Student of the Month, Star Reader, Star Writer, and Star Mathematician, perfect attendance, and academic achievement each trimester.

Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2014-15) Grade Level

Number of Students

Kindergarten

37

Grade 1

42

Grade 2

37

Grade 3

62

Grade 4

62

Grade 5

62

Grade 6

71

Grade 7

66

Grade 8

62

Total Enrollment

501

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 2 of 15

Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2014-15) Student Group

Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American

1

American Indian or Alaska Native

15

Asian

2.4

Filipino

0.8

Hispanic or Latino

14.6

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0.4

White

61.9

Two or More Races

4

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

40.3

English Learners

2.2

Students with Disabilities

14.4

Foster Youth

0.4

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): • Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; • Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Teachers

School

District

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2015-16

With Full Credential

22

22

23

168

Without Full Credential

0

0

0

0

Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential)

0

0

0

0

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

0

0

0

Total Teacher Misassignments *

0

0

0

Vacant Teacher Positions

0

0

0

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 3 of 15

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2014-15) Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects

Location of Classes

Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

This School

89.2

10.8

All Schools in District

99.0

1.0

High-Poverty Schools in District

100.0

0.0

Low-Poverty Schools in District

89.2

10.8

Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2015-16) Year and month in which data were collected: October, 2015

Textbooks and Instructional Materials/ Year of Adoption

Core Curriculum Area

From Most Recent Adoption?

Percent of Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy

Reading/Language Arts

Developmental Studies Center – SIPPS, Making Meaning and Being a Writer McDougal Littell – Adopted 2006

Yes

0

Mathematics

K-2 - Pearson Education - enVision Math - Adopted May 2015 3-5 - McGraw-Hill - My Math - Adopted May 2015 6-8 - McGraw-Hill - California Math - Adopted May 2015

Yes

0

Science

MacMillan/McGraw Hill – Adopted 2007 Glencoe/McGraw Hill – Adopted 2007

Yes

0

History-Social Science

Pearson/Scott Forseman – Adopted 2006 Pearson/Prentice Hall – Adopted 2006 TCI (as supplemental)

Yes

0

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) On, November 24, 2015, This School was inspected and evaluated by the Custodial Coordinator for the District, using the Interim Evaluation Instrument developed by the Office of Public School Construction. All areas were in good repair, with the exceptions noted below. Repairs will be made to ensure a safe environment for the students, staff and community members at Redwood School. School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: November 24, 2015 System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer

Repair Status Good

Fair

Poor

Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned

X

Interior: Interior Surfaces

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

X

Repairs to be made as needed for safety.

Page 4 of 15

School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: November 24, 2015 Repair Status

System Inspected

Good

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation

X

Repairs to be made as needed for safety.

X

Repairs to be made as needed for safety.

X

Repairs to be made as needed for safety.

X

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs

Poor

X

Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains

Fair

Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned

X

External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)

Year and month in which data were collected: November 24, 2015 Exemplary

Overall Rating

Good

Fair

Poor

X

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): • Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP], Science California Standards Tests); and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results for All Students (School Year 2014-15) Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11)

Subject

School

District

State

English Language Arts/Literacy

39

34

44

Mathematics

34

23

33

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 5 of 15

CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Number of Students Student Group All Students

Male

Female

Black or African American

American Indian or Alaska Native

Asian

Filipino

Grade

Percent of Students

Enrolled

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

3

59

57

96.6

42

30

19

7

4

58

57

98.3

39

26

21

14

5

59

58

98.3

43

22

29

5

6

67

63

94.0

25

27

40

8

7

68

67

98.5

34

22

39

3

8

63

59

93.7

27

29

34

10

3

29

49.2

59

28

14

0

4

34

58.6

47

26

15

12

5

33

55.9

52

24

18

6

6

27

40.3

33

22

41

4

7

33

48.5

48

27

21

0

8

29

46.0

41

24

31

3

3

28

47.5

25

32

25

14

4

23

39.7

26

26

30

17

5

25

42.4

32

20

44

4

6

36

53.7

19

31

39

11

7

34

50.0

21

18

56

6

8

30

47.6

13

33

37

17

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

6

0

0.0

--

--

--

--

8

1

1.6

--

--

--

--

3

12

20.3

58

8

8

17

4

6

10.3

--

--

--

--

5

13

22.0

62

23

15

0

6

8

11.9

--

--

--

--

7

13

19.1

38

31

23

0

8

6

9.5

--

--

--

--

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

4

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

2

3.0

--

--

--

--

8

3

4.8

--

--

--

--

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

5

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

8

1

1.6

--

--

--

--

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 6 of 15

Number of Students Student Group

Grade

Percent of Students

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

3

9

15.3

--

--

--

--

4

4

6.9

--

--

--

--

5

7

11.9

--

--

--

--

6

8

11.9

--

--

--

--

7

13

19.1

23

23

54

0

8

6

9.5

--

--

--

--

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

7

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

White

3

33

55.9

45

27

21

6

4

41

70.7

39

22

24

15

5

34

57.6

32

26

32

9

6

41

61.2

24

27

39

10

7

39

57.4

36

21

38

5

8

42

66.7

31

24

31

14

4

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

5

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

3

4.5

--

--

--

--

7

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

8

0

0.0

--

--

--

--

3

26

44.1

46

27

15

8

4

19

32.8

53

11

21

16

5

21

35.6

62

19

14

5

6

23

34.3

30

17

48

4

7

33

48.5

45

18

33

3

8

23

36.5

35

26

35

4

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

5

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

6

2

3.0

--

--

--

--

7

2

2.9

--

--

--

--

3

9

15.3

--

--

--

--

4

12

20.7

50

33

17

0

5

10

16.9

--

--

--

--

6

10

14.9

--

--

--

--

7

6

8.8

--

--

--

--

8

5

7.9

--

--

--

--

3

--

--

--

--

--

--

4

--

--

--

--

--

--

5

--

--

--

--

--

--

Hispanic or Latino

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

English Learners

Students with Disabilities

Foster Youth

Enrolled

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 7 of 15

Number of Students Student Group

Grade

Percent of Students

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

6

--

--

--

--

--

--

7

--

--

--

--

--

--

8

--

--

--

--

--

--

Enrolled

Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.

CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven (School Year 2014-15) Number of Students Student Group All Students

Male

Female

Black or African American

American Indian or Alaska Native

Grade

Percent of Students

Enrolled

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

3

59

57

96.6

40

23

32

4

4

58

57

98.3

26

49

19

5

5

59

58

98.3

41

34

17

7

6

67

63

94.0

29

32

32

8

7

68

65

95.6

28

28

31

14

8

63

59

93.7

49

19

17

15

3

29

49.2

48

24

24

3

4

34

58.6

26

50

15

9

5

33

55.9

45

33

15

6

6

27

40.3

26

33

33

7

7

31

45.6

42

29

23

6

8

29

46.0

62

17

14

7

3

28

47.5

32

21

39

4

4

23

39.7

26

48

26

0

5

25

42.4

36

36

20

8

6

36

53.7

31

31

31

8

7

34

50.0

15

26

38

21

8

30

47.6

37

20

20

23

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

6

0

0.0

--

--

--

--

8

1

1.6

--

--

--

--

3

12

20.3

50

8

33

0

4

6

10.3

--

--

--

--

5

13

22.0

62

23

15

0

6

8

11.9

--

--

--

--

7

12

17.6

8

42

42

8

8

6

9.5

--

--

--

--

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 8 of 15

Number of Students Student Group

Grade

Percent of Students

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

4

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

2

3.0

--

--

--

--

8

3

4.8

--

--

--

--

3

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

5

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

8

1

1.6

--

--

--

--

3

9

15.3

--

--

--

--

4

4

6.9

--

--

--

--

5

7

11.9

--

--

--

--

6

8

11.9

--

--

--

--

7

13

19.1

23

15

54

8

8

6

9.5

--

--

--

--

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

7

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

White

3

33

55.9

39

24

33

3

4

41

70.7

27

44

22

7

5

34

57.6

32

38

21

9

6

41

61.2

24

37

32

7

7

38

55.9

37

26

21

16

8

42

66.7

48

21

14

17

4

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

5

2

3.4

--

--

--

--

6

3

4.5

--

--

--

--

7

1

1.5

--

--

--

--

8

0

0.0

--

--

--

--

3

26

44.1

35

27

35

0

4

19

32.8

37

37

21

5

5

21

35.6

52

24

19

5

6

23

34.3

39

22

30

9

7

32

47.1

41

28

28

3

8

23

36.5

48

22

17

13

4

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

5

1

1.7

--

--

--

--

6

2

3.0

--

--

--

--

7

2

2.9

--

--

--

--

Asian

Filipino

Hispanic or Latino

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

English Learners

Enrolled

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 9 of 15

Number of Students Student Group Students with Disabilities

Foster Youth

Grade

Percent of Students

Tested

Tested

Standard Not Met

Standard Nearly Met

Standard Met

Standard Exceeded

3

9

15.3

--

--

--

--

4

12

20.7

33

50

17

0

5

10

16.9

--

--

--

--

6

10

14.9

--

--

--

--

7

6

8.8

--

--

--

--

8

5

7.9

--

--

--

--

3

--

--

--

--

--

--

4

--

--

--

--

--

--

5

--

--

--

--

--

--

6

--

--

--

--

--

--

7

--

--

--

--

--

--

8

--

--

--

--

--

--

Enrolled

Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes students that did not receive a score; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using students with scores.

California Standards Tests for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison) Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) Subject

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10)

School

District

State

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

58

51

49

55

51

49

59

60

56

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 10 of 15

California Standards Tests Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2014-15) Student Group

Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced

All Students in the LEA

49

All Students at the School

49

Male

44

Female

54

Black or African American

--

American Indian or Alaska Native

25

Asian

--

Filipino

--

Hispanic or Latino

--

White

52

Two or More Races

--

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

--

English Learners

--

Students with Disabilities

41

Foster Youth

--

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2014-15) Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Grade Level

Four of Six Standards

Five of Six Standards

Six of Six Standards

---5---

16.70

40.00

33.30

---7---

24.20

39.40

27.30

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): •

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year) Opportunities for Parental Involvement Parents and the community are very supportive of the educational programs at Redwood Elementary School. Many opportunities exist at Redwood School for parents to become involved and become a member or our educational community. • • • • • • • •

PTSO (Parent Teacher Student Organization) Parent Volunteers ( Forms in Office) Fieldtrips Athletics- Great way to show your school spirit SSC (School Site Council) Lunchroom volunteer Graduation Committee (8th grade) Fort Dick Fire Department (Fire Prevention Day)

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 11 of 15

• • • • •

Weekly Assemblies every Friday Title VII Program Redwood National and State Park Programs School of Hope Reading Program Assemblies

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): • • •

Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety.

Suspensions and Expulsions School

Rate

District

State

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Suspensions-------

9.07

6.40

3.38

14.14

9.77

6.58

5.07

4.36

3.80

Expulsions-------

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.13

0.10

0.09

School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year) School Safety Plan Redwood School has a comprehensive school safety plan. The plan is designed to ensure a safe, secure, and friendly learning environment for all students and staff. We discuss safety planning and protocols frequently at staff meetings. We update our Crisis Response Teams annually. The school is in compliance with all laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to hazardous materials and state earthquake standards. The school’s disaster preparedness plan includes steps for ensuring student and staff safety during a disaster. Disaster drills are held regularly throughout the year. Fire drills are held monthly, tsunami/earthquake drills are held twice a year. Procedures are in place in the event the campus needs to be secured or evacuated. To ensure student safety, supervision is provided on campus at all times. All visitors to the campus must sign in at the office and display a visitor’s pass at all times. We were participants in the Great American Shakeout on October 15, 2015 at 10:15.

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2014-15) AYP Criteria

School

District

State

Made AYP Overall

Yes

Yes

Yes

Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts

Yes

Yes

Yes

Met Participation Rate: Mathematics

Yes

Yes

Yes

Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts

N/A

N/A

N/A

Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics

N/A

N/A

N/A

Met Attendance Rate

Yes

Yes

Yes

Met Graduation Rate

N/A

Yes

Yes

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 12 of 15

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2015-16) Indicator

School

District

In PI

In PI

2009-2010

2011-2012

Year 4

Year 3

Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

N/A

7

Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

N/A

63.6

Program Improvement Status First Year of Program Improvement Year in Program Improvement*

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) 2012-13 Grade Level

Avg. Class Size

2013-14

Number of Classes 1-20

21-32

Avg. Class Size

33+

2014-15

Number of Classes 1-20

21-32

Avg. Class Size

33+

Number of Classes 1-20

21-32

K

25

1

25

2

26

2

1

25

2

24

1

26

1

2

18

2

25

2

25

1

3

23

2

24

3

24

3

4

12

1

31

2

5

34

2

6

24

1 2

1 4

1

19

1

36

2

30

35

10

34

9

1

Other

33+

10

13

1

Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2012-13 Subject

Avg. Class Size

2013-14

Number of Classrooms 1-22

23-32

33+

Avg. Class Size

2014-15

Number of Classrooms 1-22

23-32

33+

Avg. Class Size

3

1

Number of Classrooms 1-22

23-32

33+

31

2

2

31

2

2

English---------------Mathematics

37

3

32

37

3

25

---------Science---------------Social Science

37

3

32

2

2

31

3

1

37

3

32

2

2

31

3

1

2

3

Note: Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this ---------information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 13 of 15

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2014-15) Number of FTE Assigned to School

Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor-------

1.0

500

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development)

100

N/A

Library Media Teacher (Librarian)

.3

N/A

Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional)

.3

N/A

Psychologist-------

.17

N/A

Title

Social Worker-------

N/A

Nurse-------

1.0

N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist

.23

N/A

Resource Specialist-------

1.0

N/A

Other-------

N/A

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.

Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Expenditures Per Pupil Total

Supplemental/ Restricted

Basic/ Unrestricted

Average Teacher Salary

$8,712

$2,827

$5,885

$59,720

District-------

N/A

N/A

$6,988

$60,981

Percent Difference: School Site and District

N/A

N/A

-15.8

-2.1

State-------

N/A

N/A

$5,348

$65,267

Percent Difference: School Site and State

N/A

N/A

10.0

-8.5

Level School Site-------

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2014-15) Redwood Elementary School has a variety of programs to promote student achievement with a focus on attendance and district wide initiatives. Academic services include Special Day Class programs, Resource program, small group instruction focused on literacy and math skills taught by an intervention teacher, Speech/Language services. English Language Development strategies are a part of classroom instruction at every grade level for those learning English as a second language. We have school counseling services available five days a week, focusing on academic and social behaviors that lead to student success. We also have a GATE program for our intellectually gifted students. We are able to address the social/emotional development of our students through a school-wide focus on Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) program. Students are recognized regularly for safe, respectful, and responsible behavior. We have a Redwood Leadership club to recognize students who make responsible choices routinely. Redwood also receives Title 1, Program Improvement Funds which help our students move toward 21st century technology skills and support our students as they transition into Common Core strategies.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 14 of 15

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2013-14) Category

District Amount

State Average for Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary

$40,390

$40,379

Mid-Range Teacher Salary

$61,249

$62,323

Highest Teacher Salary

$70,324

$81,127

Average Principal Salary (Elementary)

$89,012

$99,192

Average Principal Salary (Middle)

$95,962

$91,287

Average Principal Salary (High)

$109,345

$112,088

Superintendent Salary

$147,640

$159,821

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries

35%

36%

Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries

5%

6%

For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.

Professional Development (Most Recent Three Years) Professional Development •

Professional Learning Communities: District-wide grade level PLC groups meet almost weekly to focus on three big ideas. 1. Ensuring that students learn. 2. Ensuring a culture of collaboration. 3. A focus on results. These meetings are a powerful opportunity for teachers to work together to improve student learning throughout our county.



Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS): Our school PBIS team has developed a school-wide matrix of behavior expectations in common areas on campus. Teachers have developed a corresponding matrix of expectations for their own classrooms. Students are positively acknowledged for being safe, respectful, and responsible in all areas at school.



Systematic Instruction in Phonemic Awareness and Phonics (SIPPs), Making Meaning, and Being a Writer: The Developmental Studies Center (DSC) has created language arts programs that are at the core of our daily instruction. Training is provided through core-day release time and after school trainings.



Technology: In a world of ever-changing technology skills, we strive to engage our students in creative uses of computers, iPads, and other forms of technology. Technology training for teachers comes in many forms: staff meeting demonstrations, weekend and after school trainings. Participation in the Hour of Code is growing each year and Digital Citizenship lessons are taught at all grade levels.

2014-15 School Accountability Report Card for Redwood Elementary School

Page 15 of 15

RW 2015-16.pdf

Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Page 3 of 15. RW 2015-16.pdf. RW 2015-16.pdf. Open.

562KB Sizes 0 Downloads 158 Views

Recommend Documents

FORM RW 1387 CHRYSLER RETIREE.pdf
Phone Email. Social Security No. Local Union No. Region. Page 1 of 1. FORM RW 1387 CHRYSLER RETIREE.pdf. FORM RW 1387 CHRYSLER RETIREE.pdf.

OGH RW to Equifax 9.11.17.pdf
Sep 11, 2017 - OGH RW to Equifax 9.11.17.pdf. OGH RW to Equifax 9.11.17.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying OGH RW to Equifax ...

RW instructions rev 14-04-03.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. RW instructions ...

Note:":x7;7;{rw,T:::',i:;#:#'
0 C f u u Y. USN. Time: 3 hrs. Sixth Semester B.E. Degree Examination, June 2012. Electrica! Drawing and CAD. 06EE65. Max. Marks:100. (08 Marks). (20 Marks). Note:":x7;7;{rw,T:::',i:;#:#';;:,:;. PART-A ! Draw a neat schematic arrangement of a nuclear

Note:":x7;7;{rw,T:::',i:;#:#' - VTUPlanet
iv) Bus couples on high tension side only. v) Feeders of 11 kV at low tension side totalno : 6. In appropriate position indicate lighting arrestors, CT, PT, earthing ...

FORM RW 1020 CHRYSLER SURVIVING SPOUSE.pdf
(ASSOCIATE STATUS). Page 1 of 1. FORM RW 1020 CHRYSLER SURVIVING SPOUSE.pdf. FORM RW 1020 CHRYSLER SURVIVING SPOUSE.pdf. Open.

RW Van Bemmelen Geology of Indonesia Vol-IA General.pdf ...
Page 3 of 766. Page 3 of 766. RW Van Bemmelen Geology of Indonesia Vol-IA General.pdf. RW Van Bemmelen Geology of Indonesia Vol-IA General.pdf. Open.

ARV Rivera , G Rivera , RW Blob , J Wyneken
1. Florida Atlantic University;. 2. Iowa State University;. 3. Clemson University. A. B. Table 1. Location of COM and mass proportions of body and flipper segments.

MMB vol.210 Powis SH, Vaughan RW
Page 1 of 327. HUMANA PRESS. Methods in Molecular Biology TM. Edited by. Stephen H. Powis. Robert W. Vaughan. MHC. Protocols. HUMANA PRESS. Methods in Molecular Biology TM. VOLUME 210. Edited by. Stephen H. Powis. Robert W. Vaughan. MHC. Protocols. P

ARV Rivera , G Rivera , RW Blob , J Wyneken
2007. DLTDataViewer2. [www.unc.edu/~thedrick/software1.html]. 7. Walker JA. 1998. Estimating velocities and accelerations of animal locomotion: a simulation experiment comparing numerical differentiation algorithms. J Exp Biol 201: 981-995. 8. Rivera

OGH RW to Equifax 9.11.17.pdf
Sign in. Page. 1. /. 4. Loading… Page 1 of 4. Page 1 of 4. Page 2 of 4. Page 2 of 4. Page 3 of 4. Page 3 of 4. OGH RW to Equifax 9.11.17.pdf. OGH RW to Equifax ...

Grade 6, Unit 3 RW and WW - Poetry.pdf
linger and take on the work of the mini-lesson. Talk is imperative during this unit. Students should be in partnerships or small groups in service of.

MEP letter to Prime Minister RW re GSP plus (7th April).pdf ...
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. MEP letter to Prime Minister RW re GSP plus (7th April).pdf. MEP letter to Prime Minister RW re GSP plus (7th April).pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying MEP letter to Prime Min

FORM RW 1221 - NON BIG 3 Retiree checkoff card.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... FORM RW 1221 - NON BIG 3 Retiree checkoff card.pdf. FORM RW 1221 - NON BIG 3 Retiree ...

pdf-1832\duct-fan-for-light-aircraft-by-rw-hovey.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. pdf-1832\duct-fan-for-light-aircraft-by-

Grade 6, Unit 5 RW and WW - Trad. Lit. & Drama.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Grade 6, Unit 5 ...

Cheap Cd Dvd Drive Usb 2.0 Slim Portable External Cd⁄Dvd-Rw ...
Cheap Cd Dvd Drive Usb 2.0 Slim Portable External C ... k Desktop Ac414 Free Shipping & Wholesale Price.pdf. Cheap Cd Dvd Drive Usb 2.0 Slim Portable ...