Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Saudi Arabia’s Economic Challenges
Currency devaluation, oil price drop, asset valuations & liquidity Samer Ghaddar, CFA
1|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Saudi Arabia’s Economic Challenges: Currency devaluation, oil price drop, asset valuations & liquidity
Section 1: General Overview Section 2: Overview of the Situation Section 3: The Role of SAMA Section 4: Reserve Assets, Current Account and Budget Deficits Section 5: Monetary Policy and Interest Rate Dilemma Section 6: Private Deposits, Foreign Assets, and the Public Perception Section 7: Credit, Inflation, and Asset Prices Section 8: Can Saudi Arabia Keep the Peg Intact? Section 9: Conclusion
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
2|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 1: General Overview currency
3.7800
potential for a severe devaluation and
3.8000
this has been apparent in the pricing
3.8200
of the forward contracts of the Saudi
3.8400
Riyal (Chart 1).
3.8600
Markets
have
tested
In 2007–8 there was speculation
SAR 1 Yr. Forward Rate
Chart 1, Proprietary Research
about Saudi Riyal revaluation despite statements from Saudi Arabian Authorities that a currency de–peg or revaluation were not possible. Speculation was apparent in Saudi Riyal forward contracts as well as foreign bank claims on Saudi Arabian Banks. This document will show that Saudi Arabia's current economic situation is not comparable to 2007–8 for a number of reasons.
What is different this time is that Saudi Arabia is starting from a massive currency reserves that were accumulated during the high oil prices period. In addition, it is also experiencing a quick decline in currency reserves, increased government borrowings from local banks and a twin–deficit, which seems here to stay.
The following key questions will be addressed in this paper: o
2015–6 Saudi Riyal forward contracts point to a devaluation; how imminent is it?
o
What is different this time?
o
Are current events comparable to the liquidity crunch witnessed in 2008–9?
o
What role has the currency peg played in asset market bubbles / crashes and would these issues prevail?
o
Is the Saudi Central Bank able to keep the peg intact?
o
Currently policymakers are consistently stressing that the peg will stay intact; however, the question is, can they afford to keep it?
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
18-Aug-16
the
2014.
3.7600
10-May-16
a topic of public discussion since late
31-Jan-16
devaluation in Saudi Arabia has been
Chart 1, SAR 1 Yr. Forward Rate (Inverted)
3.7400
23-Oct-15
a
15-Jul-15
for
6-Apr-15
potential
27-Dec-14
The
18-Sep-14
3|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 2: Overview of the Situation
Many analysts have projected a currency devaluation in Saudi Arabia, arguing that the fast drop in currency reserves, widening budget and current accounts deficits (Twin–Deficit) will lead monetary authorities and policymakers to devalue the currency. While the Saudi Riyal is pegged to the dollar, devaluation is technically in the hands of policymakers (Ministry of Finance) and SAMA (Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority) since it is not a fixed exchange rate regime – it is not defined in the constitution as is the case in a currency board system. SAMA has stressed lately that there will be no change to the peg system which indicates that devaluation is not on the table; however, sustained lower oil prices, widening budget and current accounts deficits, trade deficit, the fast drop in currency reserves, and a number of other factors are likely to force authorities to devalue the Riyal. The history/impact of the peg and market perception
Banafe published a paper in Bank of
0.276
International
that
0.274
details Saudi Arabia’s foreign exchange
0.272
intervention. They published an article
0.27
explaining why the peg system of the Riyal
0.268
against SDR was dropped in 1981:
0.266
Settlements
Papers
Chart 2, SAR vs Dollar Index
130 125
USD Index
$/SAR
120
USD Index
0.278
$/ SAR
In 2005, Muhammad Al-Jasser and Ahmed
115 110 105 100 95 90
0.264
85
within the technical framework of the ±7½% margin
Jan-89
Jan-88
Jan-87
exchange rate adjustments were made
80
Jan-86
0.262
Jan-85
“During the 1970s, frequent dollar/riyal
Chart 2, Proprietary Research, SAMA Yearly Statistics 2016
relative to the riyal’s parity of 4.28255 against the SDR, expressed in dollar terms”1 This new mechanism helped the authorities avoid further devaluations in the Riyal since the US dollar witnessed a prolonged rise in the first half of the 1980s1.
Muhammad Al-Jasser and Ahmed Banafe (2005). Foreign exchange intervention in Saudi Arabia. Bank of International Settlements Papers No. 24 pp 265-72 1
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
4|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
The current account and budget were in deficit for every single year from 1983 to 1995. Total accumulated current account deficit for the period stood at ~ US $ 169 billion, while accumulated budget deficit stood at ~ US $ 180 billion2. In 1986 speculation against the Saudi Riyal peaked due to a number of factors some of which are similar to the economic situation facing the country today. This triggered a devaluation in that year by ~3%; however, the Saudi Riyal devaluation against all major currencies was much higher due to the US Dollar peg. The dollar dropped by ~ 39% from 1985 to 19893 (Chart 2). The speculation against the Saudi Riyal came into place again in 1993 after the Gulf War and in 1998 after the drop in oil prices due to the Asian crisis. In both years SAMA intervened in the forward market3. Between 2002–2014, with the exception of 2009, Saudi Arabia sustained a budget surplus. Throughout this period, money supply as measured by M3 increased by around five times to US $ 460 billion as of December 2014. Since August 2015 the growth in money supply has become negative averaging (0.25%) per month4. The inflationary pressure witnessed from 2004 to 2008 raised the question of the sustainability of the peg to the US dollar. Many economists and policy makers were openly expressing their views that each individual GCC country should revalue its currency against the US dollar or de-peg from the greenback in order to regain control over their monetary policy tools. This led to increased speculation of a currency de–peg and /or currency revaluation of the GCC currencies, mainly the UAE Dirham, Saudi Riyal and the Qatari Riyal. Although policymakers in Saudi Arabia in 2007–08 were clear that a currency de-peg was not possible as they could afford to keep the peg, market participants never ruled out a revaluation. Currency forwards reflected a re-pricing of the GCC currencies of an average range of 3–5% percent, reaching up to 30% in certain cases.
SAMA Yearly Statistics Muhammad Al-Jasser and Ahmed Banafe (2005). Foreign exchange intervention in Saudi Arabia. Bank of International Settlements Papers No. 24 pp 265-72 4 SAMA Yearly Statistics 2 3
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
5|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 3: The Role of SAMA
Saudi Arabia runs an orthodox central banking system with a mandate to maintain
Chart 3, Money Supply $600.00 Money Supply (M1) $500.00
Money Supply (M2)
the pegged exchange rate, while pursuing price through the supervision of commercial
$300.00
banks5.
$200.00
Billions
stability and overseeing financial stability
Money Supply (M3) $400.00
$100.00
The influx of oil revenues does not directly
Jan-01 Oct-01 Jul-02 Apr-03 Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13 Oct-13 Jul-14 Apr-15 Jan-16
$0.00
impact liquidity in the local market. Oil receipts
are deposited at SAMA and credited to government accounts on the liability side of the balance sheet while assets increase through the purchases of foreign currency assets.
Chart 4, GDP vs Money Supply $500.00
$800
$450.00
$700
$400.00
$300 $200
Arabia’s budget threshold, government expenditure declines leading to reduced local
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
Nominal GDP US $ (RHS)
2016 E
when oil prices decline to below Saudi
$0
2006
$0.00
2005
money supply growth (Chart 3). Conversely,
$100
2004
$50.00
Money Supply M3
Charts 3, 4 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
liquidity (Chart 4). SAMA manages local liquidity in the banking system through the REPO and Reverse REPO process and local currency treasury bills issuance.
Al-Hamidy (2012), Aspects of fiscal/debt management and monetary policy interaction: the recent experience of Saudi Arabia. Bank of International Settlements Papers No 67, 301
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
$400
$100.00
funding and allowing excessive credit and
5Abdulrahman
$500
Nominal GDP Billions
$150.00
2003
commercial banks access to cheap sources of
$200.00
2002
results in increased local liquidity giving
$250.00
2001
oil prices), higher government expenditure
$300.00
2000
During periods of large capital inflow (high
M3 Billions
$600 $350.00
6|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 4: Reserve Assets, Current Account and Budget Deficits Chart 5, Nominal & Real GDP
Chart 6, Evolution of Reserve Assets
$800
$800
6%
$700
$700
5%
$600
$600
$500
$500
$400
$400
$300
$300
$200
$200
$100
$100
-2%
$0
-3%
Billions
50% 30% 10% -10%
4% 3%
6-month moving avg.
70%
Total Reserves Billion US $
90%
-50% Change Real GDP Change Nominal GDP Real GDP US $ (RHS) Nominal GDP US $ (RHS)
-70%
$0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
-90%
1% 0% -1%
Jan-01 Oct-01 Jul-02 Apr-03 Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13 Oct-13 Jul-14 Apr-15 Jan-16
-30%
2%
Reserve Assets
Oil revenues created enormous trade
Monthly Change (6-month Moving avg.)
surplus for Saudi Arabia between 2006–2014 to reach an accumulated level of US $1.1 trillion, while reserve assets peaked in mid–2014 at US $ 745 billion6 (Chart 6). Reserve assets have been dropping since July 2014 at an average monthly
$500 $450 $400
rate of 1% (Chart 6). Remarkably,
$350
growth rate of reserves decelerated
$300
since 2011 to reach a consistent negative growth rate since 2014 (Chart 6).
Chart 7, Evolution of Money Supply M3
M3 (LHS) Change M3
40%
$200
30%
$150
20%
$100
10%
$50
0%
Dec-00 Sep-01 Jun-02 Mar-03 Dec-03 Sep-04 Jun-05 Mar-06 Dec-06 Sep-07 Jun-08 Mar-09 Dec-09 Sep-10 Jun-11 Mar-12 Dec-12 Sep-13 Jun-14 Mar-15 Dec-15
-10%
since 2014 while Money Supply growth did not start declining until 2015, which increases our concern of a potential exacerbated drop in GDP growth rates
6
SAMA Annual Statistics Report 2016
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
70%
50%
$250
GDP growth rate has been negative
(Chart 4 & 5).
80%
60%
$0
100% 90%
Billions
Chart 5, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016, World Bank Data & IMF Data Charts 6, 7, Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
7|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
Chart 9, Revenues vs Expenditure
Chart 8, Budget Surplus/ ( Deficit)
35%
$350
30%
Billions
$150 $100
25% Surplus/ (Deficit) LHS Surplus/ (Deficit) % GDP
20%
$300
$350
Billions
$200
August 31, 2016
$300 Total revenues
$250
$250 Expenditure
15% 10% 5%
$0
$200
$200
$150
$150
Billions
$50
0% -$50
-5% -10%
-$100
$100
$100
$50
$50
$0
$0
2014
2016 E
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
Chart 10, Current Account vs Reserve Assets Yearly chng. $200
$150
Reserve Assets 2015
2014
2013
2012
-$50
Is the twin-deficit a new trend, or is it a
-$100
Saudi Arabia recorded a budget deficit of US
Current account Reserve assets Charts 8, 9, 10, Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
$ 17.5 billion in 2014, US $ 96.5 billion in 2015 and is projected to be US $ 63 billion in 2016; 2.3%, 14.5% and 9.5% of GDP respectively (Chart 8).
2016 current account deficit is expected to be comparable to 2015 based on available Q1 2016 data which was ~ US $ 18 billion8 (Chart 10).
The last time we saw such a prolonged period of twin deficit was between 1983 and 1995. During this time period reserve assets dropped by a total of US $ 63 billion and the currency was devalued by ~ 11%7.
7
SAMA Annual Statistics Report 2016
8
SAMA Monthly & Annual Statistics Report July 2016
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
$50
$0
-$100
one-off?
$100
-$50
2011
$0
2006
level ever reached7 (Chart 10)8.
2010
reached US $ 53.4 billion, also the highest
2009
$50
2008
Simultaneously, the current account deficit
$100
2007
surpassing US $ 96 billion (Chart 8).
$150
Current Account
reached an all-time high in nominal terms,
Billions
In 2015, the budget deficit in Saudi Arabia
2016 E
Twin Deficit, Devaluation in the Making?
1992
2014
2016 E
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
-20%
1992
-$150
1994
-15%
-$150
8|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Chart 11, Current account % GDP
20%
150%
governmental expenditure of 33% of
15%
100%
10%
50%
5%
0%
0%
-50%
-5%
8).
-10%
At an average of US $ 45 per barrel in
-15%
2016 E
2016 & US $ 237 billion in 2017 (Chart
2015
expenditure to be US $ 227 billion in
2014
GDP, we would expect governmental
2013
1992–2015
250%
2012
Assuming
2011
average
2010
200%
2009
25%
2008
2017?
2007
30%
2006
How does the budget deficit look in 2016 &
-100% -150% -200%
Current account to GDP
2016, total government revenues
% Change in Current Account Deficit
would stand at US $ 163 billion implying a budget deficit of US $ 63 billion or 9.5 % of GDP, a conservative estimate.
At an average of US $ 55 per barrel in 2017, the budget deficit would be ~ US $ 46 billion or 6.5% of GDP (Charts 8 & 9).
How does the current account deficit look in 2016?
Current account deficit reached ~ US $ 18 billion in the first quarter of 2016 and is expected to remain at the same level for the remaining 3 quarters of the year implying a similar current account deficit for 2016 as 2015 (Chart 11).
Reserve assets dropped by ~ US $ 53 billion in the first 7 months of 20169 and are projected to drop by ~ US $ 85 billion by the end of this year. Chart 12, SIBOR vs Public Debt
250
Billions
Impact on the local interest rate and public debt
2.50% SIBOR 3 month 2.00%
200
1.50%
150
1.00%
100
0.50%
50
0.00%
-
The widening budget deficit since 2015 has led the government to borrow locally, which has driven up
Charts 11, 12, Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
9
SAMA Annual and Monthly Statistics Report July 2016
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
Jun-16
Dec-15
May-15
Nov-14
Apr-14
Oct-13
Mar-13
Aug-12
Jul-11
Feb-12
Jan-11
Jun-10
(Chart 12).
Dec-09
measured by the 3 month SIBOR)
May-09
interest rates by around 100 bps (as
9|P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
As rates increased the private sector total borrowing started to drop, which is a typical crowding out effect.
The stubbornly high current account deficit and the lower government spending has led to a drop in Money Supply as presented in Chart 7.
What does this mean? In terms of total spending, Saudi Arabia’s budget is around US $ 227 billion, or 33.7%10 of GDP and the current account deficit is at ~US $ 50 billion. Since oil exports represent the majority of exports in the country and are the primary source of FX, the current account deficit is expected to continue to grow as oil prices decline. Extrapolating year to date monthly reserves gives a projected 2016 drop of reserves in the range of US $ 80 120 billion. In the short term, policymakers are likely to deal with the FX reserves drain by increasing public debt. Since Debt / GDP ratio is low at 8%, Saudi Arabia has capacity to increase this ratio to around 50% (mainly through foreign debt), which is around US $ 270 billion. In parallel, policymakers will seek to transform the economy to increase non-oil exports and allow foreign direct investment to fill the gap in the balance of payments in anticipation of the medium term when all monetary policy tools are exhausted.
10
Propriety research & estimates
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
10 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 5: Monetary Policy and Interest Rate Dilemma
Chart 13, Credit to GDP & Growth rate 70%
Chart 14, SIBOR vs LIBOR
25%
3%
20%
3%
SIBOR 12M
15%
2%
Libor USD 12 month
10%
2%
5%
1%
0%
1%
-5%
0%
65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35%
Monetary policy and interest rate dilema Saudi Arabia’s interest rates are linked
50%
to the US rates, as the USD is the anchor
45%
This can be counterproductive as the local economy and the U. S. economy do not necessarily have the same growth engines.
Jul-16
Sep-15
Feb-16
Apr-15
Nov-14
Jan-14
Jun-14
Aug-13
Oct-12
Mar-13
May-12
Jul-11
Dec-11
Sep-10
45% 40%
Private Sector Credit to GDP
35% 30%
Private Sector Credit Growth RHS
25%
40%
20% 15%
35%
10% 30% 5% 25%
0%
20%
-5%
Dec-93 Jan-95 Feb-96 Mar-97 Apr-98 May-99 Jun-00 Jul-01 Aug-02 Sep-03 Oct-04 Nov-05 Dec-06 Jan-08 Feb-09 Mar-10 Apr-11 May-12 Jun-13 Jul-14 Aug-15
currency to which the Riyal is linked to.
Feb-11
Chart 15, Private Sector Credit to GDP & Growth Rate 60% 55%
Apr-10
Dec-93 Jan-95 Feb-96 Mar-97 Apr-98 May-99 Jun-00 Jul-01 Aug-02 Sep-03 Oct-04 Nov-05 Dec-06 Jan-08 Feb-09 Mar-10 Apr-11 May-12 Jun-13 Jul-14 Aug-15
20%
Nov-09
Total credit Growth Rate RHS
25%
Jan-09
30%
Jun-09
Total Credit / GDP
In mid–2015 Saudi Arabia’s interbank lending rate (benchmark used by commercial banks for lending – “SIBOR”) and the LIBOR started to
Chart 16, Credit to GDP & Credit Growth Rate 25%
diverge as presented in Chart 14. 20%
From 2009 to 2015 there was excessive credit creation, high money supply growth – credit doubled in the same period to reach US
15%
80% Public Sector credit % GDP Public Sector Credit Growth RHS
10% 0% 5%
lending rates in the same period since LIBOR / SIBOR differential rate was low (Chart 14). Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
-20%
0%
-40%
Dec-93 Jan-95 Feb-96 Mar-97 Apr-98 May-99 Jun-00 Jul-01 Aug-02 Sep-03 Oct-04 Nov-05 Dec-06 Jan-08 Feb-09 Mar-10 Apr-11 May-12 Jun-13 Jul-14 Aug-15
The main reason behind this was low
40%
20%
$400 billion (Chart 13).
60%
Charts 13, 14, 15, 16 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
11 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
And negative real rates, rates after deducing inflation.
3.00%
Chart 17, SIBOR Rates
2.50%
SIBOR 3M
Currently we are in the middle of a contracting business cycle and credit and Money Supply growth rates have gone into a downward trend (Charts
SIBOR 6M
2.00%
SIBOR 12M
1.50%
1.00%
15, 7). While lending rates are up due
Stress in the banking system is on the rise, as measured by the total amount of reverse REPO agreements which
Jun-16
Feb-16
Jun-15
Oct-15
Feb-15
Jun-14
Oct-14
Feb-14
Jun-13
Oct-13
Feb-13
Jun-12
Oct-12
Feb-12
Jun-11
Oct-11
Feb-11
Jun-10
Chart 18, Credit Public vs Private Sector $60.0
$50.0
have been spiking since mid–2015 as presented in Chart 19.
Oct-10
0.00%
Feb-10
(Charts 12, 17).
0.50%
$450 Credit to Public Sector
Billions
to increased public sector borrowings
$400 $350
Credit to Private Sector (RHS)
$40.0
$300 $250
$30.0 $200 $150
Billions
$20.0
$10.0
Billions
Jan-15
Jan-13
Jan-11
Jan-09
Jan-07
Jan-05
Jan-03
Jan-01
Jan-99
Jan-97
Jan-95
Chart 19 Repo Transactions $4
$3
$3
$2
$2
$1 Repo Transactions $1
Charts 17, 18, 19, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
Jan-16
Jun-15
Apr-14
Nov-14
Sep-13
Jul-12
Feb-13
Dec-11
Oct-10
May-11
Mar-10
Jan-09
Aug-09
Jun-08
Apr-07
Nov-07
Sep-06
Jul-05
Feb-06
$0
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
$50 $0
Jan-93
$0.0
$100
12 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 6: Private Deposits, Foreign Assets, and the Public Perception
general public in Saudi Arabia has
3%
experienced a downward trend
2% 1%
-1%
increasing FX deposits resulting in
-2%
10%
-3%
5%
-4%
Oct-15
Feb-14
Dec-14
Jun-12
Apr-13
Oct-10
Aug-11
Feb-09
Dec-09
Jun-07
Apr-08
Oct-05
Aug-06
Feb-04
the first quarter of 2016 (Chart 20).
Dec-04
0%
Jun-02
-5%
Apr-03
foreign deposits peaking at 20% in
15%
0%
mid–2015, depositors started the 6-month average change in
20%
Oct-00
since the early 2000s. However, in
25%
4%
Aug-01
Total foreign deposits held by the
Dec-99
Chart 20, Foreign Currency Deposits / Total Deposits
5%
Foreign Currency Deposits/ Total Deposits (RHS)
Change 6-month moving Avergae
Since that spike, markets calmed down and depositors started to switch
40%
back to local currency. As a result, foreign deposits as a percent of total deposits witnessed a slight drop (Chart 20).
30% 20%
Chart 21, Banks' Foreign Assets / Total Asets Bank's Foreign Assets/ Total Assets % Change in Bank's Foreign Assets/ Total Assets
40% 35% 30% 25%
10% 20% 0% 15%
On the asset side of the balance sheet
-10%
we see the same trend. There was a
-20%
5%
-30%
0%
spike in foreign assets held at a level that had not been reached since 2009
10%
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
(Chart 21). Charts 20, 21 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
In late 2014 banks and depositors began changing their perception about the Saudi Riyal. Increased foreign assets and foreign deposits means there is a fear of a devaluation in the system. Since foreign assets and currency deposits are starting from a low base (foreign deposits are at around 10% of total deposits and foreign assets are less than 15% of foreign assets), there is minimal pressure on foreign reserves. However, if this trend persists, the pressure on foreign reserves will gradually increase.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
13 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
A deeper look into commercial banks’ assets – liabilities: Is it any different? Chart 22, Banks' Foreign Liabilities vs Assets $40.0
increased
as
on
a
and Saudi Arabia in particular, increased
$15.0
lending
and
$10.0
deposits to Saudi banks (Chart 22)
$5.0
$10
$0.0
$0
Jan-13
Jan-15 Jan-14 Mar-15
Jan-09
Jan-07
Jan-11
dropped
Nov-12
banks
Jul-10 Sep-11
Arabian
Jan-05
In the same period local Saudi
$30 $20
Jan-03
direct
Billions
Riyal
Jan-01
through
$40
Saudi
Jan-99
the
$60 $50
Jan-97
to
$70
$20.0
Jan-95
exposure
their
$25.0
$80
Banks' Foreign Assets
$30.0
Jan-93
banks
Banks' Foreign Liabilities
$35.0
currency
revaluation in the GCC in general foreign
$90
speculation
their
foreign assets exposure (Chart 22). This led to zero net foreign assets
Chart 23, Banks' net Foreign Assets $70
from March to June 2008 (Chart 23), the lowest level since 1992.
Banks' net Foreign Assets
$60
In 2015 the opposite happened
$40
Billions
$50
and speculation about currency devaluation increased, which led to an increase in local banks’ foreign
$30
$20
assets and a big drop of foreign
highest level ever reached in Saudi Arabia. This level has since dropped to ~ US
Charts 22, 23 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
$ 42 billion, which is still high compared to past levels (Chart 23).
Overall, the combination of increased foreign assets of commercial banks and the drop of claims on local banks from foreign institutions is a sign of pressure in FX markets. The highlight from this analysis shows that both local and foreign financial institutions are prepared for a potential devaluation.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
May-16
May-09
Jan-07 Mar-08
Nov-05
Jul-03 Sep-04
May-02
Jan-00 Mar-01
Nov-98
60 billion at the peak. This is the
Jul-96 Sep-97
$0
May-95
Net foreign assets reached ~ US $
$10
Jan-93 Mar-94
banks’ exposure to Saudi banks.
Banks' Foreign Assets
2007–08
Billions
In
Banks' Foreign Liab.
14 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 7: Credit, Inflation, and Asset Prices Chart 24, Capital Formation
The government ran a public budget surplus throughout the period between
30%
2003
total
25%
accumulated surplus of ~ US $ 54
20%
20%
billion.
In this period, government
15%
15%
expenditure was the main driver of
10%
10%
5%
5%
0%
0%
In the same period, Gross Capital
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
Chart 25, Credit / GDP vs CPI
7%
20%
-3%
25). The effect is more obvious in equity markets as presented in Chart 26.
Total Credit / GDP LHS
25%
Correlation between credit growth and
20%
equity market valuations is high (Chart
15%
26). Market PE peaked in 2006 at 60 x
2015
-2%
credit creation played a role (Chart
2014
-1%
25%
2013
30%
2012
0%
2011
35%
Inflation as measure by CPI peaked in
2010
1%
2009
2%
40%
2008
45%
2007
3%
2006
4%
50%
2005
55%
2004
stable at an average of 13% of GDP
2003
5%
2002
60%
2001
Formation by the private sector was
2000
6%
Saudi Arabia in 2008 at 6% while
25%
65%
(Chart 24).
70%
2001
2003 to 27% of GDP in 2014 (Chart 24).
2000
which increased from 20% of GDP in
1999
a
1998
with
1997
2014
30%
Private Sector Gross Capital Formation % of GDP Gross Capital Formation % of GDP
1996
and
increased Gross Capital Formation
35%
Government Gross Capital Formation % of GDP
1999
35%
CPI
Chart 26, Market PE vs Credit Growth
70 X 60 X 50 X 40 X
10%
earnings (after touching the 100 x mark 0%
10 X
Market Valuation PE x
Credit Growth LHS
Charts 24, 25, 26 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
2016 E
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
X
2002
-5%
2001
20%.
20 X
2000
was at the highest yearly growth at
5%
1999
in February 2006) while credit creation
30 X
15 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Credit for finance listed equity purchases has a high correlation with equity markets. The stock market index peaked in 2016 after a peak in equity financing. In the last 5 quarters,
equity
financing
Chart 27, Share Financing vs Stock Index 20,000
18,000
18,000
16,000
16,000
14,000
14,000
12,000
12,000
has
10,000
dropped as did the index with a slight
8,000
10,000 8,000 6,000
6,000
delay (Chart 27).
4,000
4,000
2,000
2,000 -
Credit
Share financing ($ mn) LHS
Money supply and credit creation,
Chart 28, Money Supply (M3) vs Equity Valuations 120 x
Money Supply (M3)
Billions
mainly private sector credit, have a direct impact on equity valuation.
Saudi Stock Index
$600
$500
100 x
PE (x) (RHS)
$400
80 x
average of 15.0x earnings while
$300
60 x
current PE stands at 12.75x (Chart 28).
$200
40 x
$100
20 x
$0
Oct-15
Feb-14
Dec-14
Jun-12
Apr-13
Oct-10
Aug-11
Feb-09
Dec-09
Jun-07
Apr-08
Oct-05
Aug-06
Feb-04
Dec-04
valuations still trade between 1 standard deviation with a lower
x
Jun-02
any market re-rating. Current market
Apr-03
creation and money supply will hinder
Aug-01
The recent drop in private credit
Dec-99
Market PE is trading below the 10-year
Oct-00
-
Q1 2000 Q4 2000 Q3 2001 Q2 2002 Q1 2003 Q4 2003 Q3 2004 Q2 2005 Q1 2006 Q4 2006 Q3 2007 Q2 2008 Q1 2009 Q4 2009 Q3 2010 Q2 2011 Q1 2012 Q4 2012 Q3 2013 Q2 2014 Q1 2015 Q4 2015
Equity valuations and money supply &
Chart 29, PE Range 25 x
bound at 8.45x earnings and the upper bound at 22x earnings (Chart
20 x
29). 15 x
If the drop in credit growth and
10 x
- 1 Stdv.
money supply to the private sector continues as presented in Charts 26 &
PE (x)
+ 1 Stdv. 5x
28, it would negatively impact
negative credit growth would negatively impact
corporate
profitability.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
Charts 27, 28, 29 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
Jan-16
Jul-15
Jan-15
Jul-14
Jul-13
Jan-14
Jan-13
Jul-12
Jan-12
Jul-11
Jul-10
Jan-11
Jul-09
Jan-10
Jan-09
Jul-08
Jan-08
Jul-07
This is mainly due to the fact that
x
Jan-07
current and future equity valuation.
16 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Furthermore, the higher cost of funding would drag down profitability of listed banks through lower interest margins. Section 8: Can Saudi Arabia keep the peg intact?
Chart 30, Reserve Assets to Monetary Base 14 x
Saudi Arabia has enough reserve assets to
12 x
12 x
back the currency in circulation, monetary
10 x
base, M1 and M2.
Multiple
14 x
8x
8x
6x
6x
Reserve assets stand at around 7 times monetary base, defined as the sum of
10 x
Reserve Assets/ Monetary Base
4x
2x
(deposits held by banks and other depository
x
Avg.
institutions in their accounts at the central bank)11. This means the country can easily process known as dollarization of the
4x
economy12, since the reserve assets to
4x 3x
Multiple
5x
monetary base ratio far exceeds the
3x
one to one ratio required. However,
2x
this ratio has been dropping since
2x
2013 and currently the ratio is below
1x
the 15-year average of 7 times (Chart
1x
Reserve Assets/ M1 Avg. Reserve Assets/ M1 Reserve Assets/ M2 Avg. Reserve Assets/ M2
x
30)
Chart 31, Reserve Assets / Money Supply
move from the Saudi Riyal to USD, a
The second ratio to consider is total reserves to M1 and M21. o
Jan-01 Oct-01 Jul-02 Apr-03 Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13 Oct-13 Jul-14 Apr-15 Jan-16
Charts 30, 31 Proprietary Research, SAMA Monthly & Yearly Statistics July 2016
(M1 is defined as the sum of currency held by the public and transaction deposits at depository institutions. M2 is defined as M1 plus savings deposits, and retail money market mutual fund shares).
11 12
Federal Reserve of the United States https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/money_12845.htm Baltic states need not devalue; monetary policy consistent with pegs: Steve Hanke
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
2x
x
Jan-01 Oct-01 Jul-02 Apr-03 Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13 Oct-13 Jul-14 Apr-15 Jan-16
currency in circulation and reserve balances
4x
17 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
SAMA is an orthodox central bank and not a currency board system and can therefore print money. As such, it is necessary to also consider a ratio that covers the wider money supply such as total Reserves to M1 or M2. This ratio measures the ability of the central bank to move the money in circulation and deposits into USD.
Reserves to M1 and M2 stand at 1.85 times and 1.35 times, respectively, which is higher than the one to one ratio needed. However, both ratios have been steeply dropping and are lower than their 15-year average (Chart 31).
In summary, the combination of these ratios (all with a coverage ratio above 1), means SAMA has the ability to convert all money in circulation and deposits at financial institution to US Dollar. However, this ratio is dropping fast and currently below historical averages. The highlight from this analysis shows that a potential devaluation is not imminent. However, given the rapid decline of the ratios, in particular reserves to M1 and M2, a potential devaluation is likely in the medium term.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
18 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Section 9: Conclusion o
SAMA has stressed lately that there will be no change to the peg system which indicates that devaluation is not on the table; however, sustained lower oil prices, widening budget and current accounts deficits, trade deficit, the fast drop in currency reserves, and a number of other factors are likely to force authorities to devalue the Riyal in the medium term.
o
In the short term, policymakers are likely to deal with the FX reserves drain by increasing public debt. Since Debt / GDP is low at 8%, Saudi Arabia has capacity to increase Debt / GDP to around 50% (mainly through foreign debt), which is around US $ 270 billion. In parallel, policymakers will seek to transform the economy to increase non-oil exports and allow foreign direct investment to fill the gap in the balance of payments in anticipation of the medium term when all monetary policy tools are exhausted.
o
Banks and depositors have started changing their perception about the Saudi Riyal. Increased foreign assets and foreign deposits means there is a fear of a devaluation in the system.
o
Overall, the combination of increased foreign assets within local commercial banks and the drop of claims on local banks from foreign institutions are both a sign of pressure in the FX markets. Both local and foreign financial institutions are more prepared for a potential devaluation.
o
Reserves Assets to M1 and M2 stand at 1.85 times and 1.35 times, respectively. The combination of these ratios (all with a coverage ratio above 1), means SAMA has the ability to convert all money in circulation and deposits at financial institution to US Dollar. This analysis shows that a potential devaluation is not imminent. However, given the rapid decline of the ratios, a potential devaluation is likely in the medium term.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
19 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
References
George T. Abed, S. Nuri Erbas, Behrouz Guerami (2003). The GCC Monetary Union: Some Considerations for the Exchange Rate Regime. IMF Working Paper No. 03/66 Abdulrahman Al-Hamidy (2012). Aspects of fiscal/debt management and monetary policy interaction: the recent experience of Saudi Arabia. Bank of International Settlements Papers No. 67, pp 301-307 Muhammad Al-Jasser and Ahmed Banafe (2005). Foreign exchange intervention in Saudi Arabia. Bank of International Settlements Papers No. 24, pp 265-72 Laura Davidson (2011). The Causes of Price Inflation & Deflation, FUNDAMENTAL ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES THE DEFLATIONISTS HAVE IGNORED. LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 3, ART. NO. 13 (2011) Richard Duncan (2005). The Dollar Crisis: Causes, Consequences. 1st ed. Wiley Richard Duncan (2012). The New Depression: The Breakdown of the Paper Money Economy. 1st ed. Wiley Andrew Filardo, Madhusudan Mohanty and Ramon Moreno (2012). Central bank and government debt management: issues for monetary policy. Bank of International Settlements Papers No 67. pp 51-71 Steve Hanke (2009). Baltic states need not devalue; monetary policy consistent with pegs. http://ftp.lankabusinessonline.com/news/baltic-states-need-notdevalue;-monetary-policy-consistent-with-pegs:-steve-hanke/955909581 Steve H. Hanke Lars Jonung, and Kurt Schuler (1993). Russian Currency and Finance: A Currency Board Approach to Reform. 1st ed. Routledge Greenwood, John (2007). Hong Kong's Link to the US Dollar: Origins and Evolution. 1st ed. Hong Kong University Press Jonathan D. Ostry, Atish R. Ghosh, Karl Habermeier, Marcos Chamon, Mahvash S. Qureshi, and Dennis B.S. Reinhardt (2010). Capital Inflows: The Role of Controls. IMF Staff Position Note SPN/10/04. Mario Pessoa and Mike Williams (2012). Government Cash Management: Relationship between the Treasury and the Central Bank. International Monetary Fund Federal Reserve of the United States https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/money_12845.htm . SAMA Yearly Statistics. http://www.sama.gov.sa/enUS/EconomicReports/Pages/YearlyStatistics.aspx SAMA Monthly Statistics. http://www.sama.gov.sa/enus/EconomicReports/Pages/MonthlyStatistics.aspx SAMA Inflation Reposts. http://www.sama.gov.sa/enUS/EconomicReports/Pages/InflationReport.aspx SAMA Financial Stability report http://www.sama.gov.sa/enUS/EconomicReports/Pages/FinancialStability.aspx SAMA Development Report http://www.sama.gov.sa/enUS/EconomicReports/Pages/DevelopmentReports. aspx
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document
20 | P a g e
Saudi Arabia Macro Analysis Samer Ghaddar, CFA
August 31, 2016
Disclaimer For Informational purposes only and not an offer or solicitation. All data is confidential and proprietary and not for distribution. The text, graphs and other materials contained in this report are proprietary to Samer Ghaddar (The Author). and constitute valuable intellectual property. No material from any part of this report can be transmitted, broadcast, transferred, assigned, reproduced or in any other way used or otherwise disseminated in any form to any person or entity, without the explicit written consent of the Author. The Author reserves the right, without further notice, to pursue to the fullest extent allowed by the law any and all criminal and civil remedies for the violation of his rights.
Samer Ghaddar, CFA. All Rights Reserved, as per the last page of this document