The puppet’s master By Rabbi Shmuel Gluck:
Most parents try to do what’s best for their children. Some唙mes this requires them to ask for advice from others. In many cases the advice given to these parents requires them to adjust both their approach to, and their role in, their children’s growth. When the advice given is different from what they expect, they’re o킔en disappointed. In some situa唙ons, they regret asking for advice. Instead, they devise a plan for their children’s growth by themselves. Their mo唙va唙on to do things “on their own” is based partly on their hurt feelings and partly on their inability to believe that their view of what needs to be done may be incorrect. Parents believe that since they are the as parents, it’s their responsibility to be the leaders in the efforts to help their children grow. As leaders, they feel that they must have the final decision and that it’s their job. This means that if some form of interven唙on must take place, it should be the parents who decide on the necessary interven唙on. I speak to many parents who’re disappointed when they’re overruled. They look around and think, “Whose children are we talking about?” The parents believe that the Mechanchim are only advisors. The Mechanchim believe that the parents “invited them in” to discuss their children because it’s their area of exper唙se. The parent's’ “ownership” of the children was never in doubt, and the Mechanchim believe that acknowledging that they’re the experts also should also not be. Since the parents are desperate to improve their family’s situa唙on, they ignore their feelings of being “le킔 on the side” of this highly important mee唙ng. They’ve accepted that the “team’s view” of what the next step should be, overrides what they feel it should be. The next step is deciding who’ll implement that step. In many cases the children’s Rabbeim and mentors, and the parents’ Rav and Mechanchim, advise the parents to take a step back. Once the parents hear everyone in unison suggest that they shouldn’t be the ones to help their own children, they become offended. Claims of “cult leaders stealing their children” or “Mechanchim that don’t understand them” can be heard under their breath. I believe that the parents are making several mistakes.
1) They believe that when people are responsible for someone, it automa唙cally makes them the ones with the greatest insight into the ma⃡er. This isn’t true. I may be responsible for keeping my car in good running condi唙on, but I’ll s唙ll take it to a mechanic when necessary. The same is true with everything that I own. 2) They also believe that, since they “know” the children from birth, they must have the clearest understanding of “who their children really are”. In reality, we can be “strangers” to the people we love. 3) They believe that those who lead a project are the ones who should be the most ac唙ve and visible. They’re wrong. It’s naive to feel that there’s something important about being high profile. Successful people are more concerned with achievement than recogni唙on, even in areas as important as their children’s success. The underlying issue is that parents, like others, are, to various degrees, not as secure as they should be. Success removes, or at least hides, the insecurity. A lack of success, and failure, magnifies it. The parents, who’re confronted with a difficult situa唙on centering on the most important thing to them, their children, are probably not doing well right now. Their team, all sincere and goal oriented, don’t consider that the parents of their pa唙ents (the children) may be, to a lesser degree, also pa唙ents. The parents also need people to be sensi唙ve to them. This isn’t a cri唙cism of the parents, but is an understandable weakness on their part. What I o킔en suggest to parents is that they accept the role of the puppet’s master. The puppet’s master is never seen on stage, despite being the one who’s making everything happen. It becomes very easy for those watching a show to forget that the puppet’s master exists. Not only do parents exist, they’re the ones who’re responsible for their children. This means that they should create their children’s team of advisors. Parents should be a part of the discussions and should be allowed to ask as many ques唙ons as they feel are necessary. However, they must keep in mind that ownership of the car doesn’t give them the responsibility of deciding what needs to be fixed. A킔er all the ques唙ons have been asked, even if some of the answers are not sa唙sfactory, the decision should be le킔 to the mechanic. In our situa唙on, the decision should be le킔 to the parents’ team. The parents are allowed to get a second opinion just as they can for their car. However, just as with their car, they must be certain that their need for a second opinion is not based on a personal bias, unwillingness to spend money, a personal discomfort, or because they feel that their team didn’t treat them with the proper respect. Helping children grow is often a humbling experience. I found it fascina唙ng, to learn that Shlomo Hamelech had advisors (Sefer M’lochim). Imagine that, the smartest man that will ever live was willing to listen to, and even requested others to offer him, sugges唙ons. I assume that he followed their sugges唙ons. Listening to the advice of others is something we shouldn’t be ashamed of doing.
Once a plan has been devised, the parents may find that their having a small, if any, role, in implemen唙ng the agreed upon plan, was a deliberate decision. They sit in the room, listening to their children’s Rabbeim and mentors repeat how the parents shouldn’t say anything, shouldn’t cri唙cize, and, in some extreme cases, should not even speak to their children. Being told to “stay away” can’t make anyone feel good. To make the parents feel even more mistreated, they’re o킔en instructed to pay their children’s rent, subsidize their salary, and do many other expensive, mundane and frustra唙ng tasks. When the children are told about the jobs, they’re told that the Mechanchim found them. When they ask who dropped off their new clothing they’re told it was just a friend. The parents are ge㘴ᄵng the worst deal possible. This doesn’t mean that they’re not in charge. The puppet’s master is the star of the show even when his part is unrecognized. I comfort the parents by telling them that if they’re willing to accept short term “abuse”, possibly for several years, they’ll be appreciated for many years a킔erwards. Even now, the parents selected team will respect them more than they can imagine. However, the real reward will be their children who, because of their selfless commitment to them, will flourish as much as they possibly can. The author can be contacted at s
[email protected]
If you enjoyed or benefitted from this article please consider making a donation to Areivim
CLICK HERE TO DONATE AREIVIM CHOOSE SUCCESS 29 WEST MAPLE AVENUE MONSEY NY 10952 845 371 2760 |
[email protected] | WWW.AREIVIM.COM © AREIVIM 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reprin唙ng this ar唙cle for commercial use without the express consent of Areivim is strictly prohibited. To request permission please contact the Areivim office at 845 371 2760 or i
[email protected] .