Reasoning Inequality Trick - Solve any Question within 10 seconds Today I am going to share King Soldiers and Public technique to solve Inequalities. By using this technique, you can solve any question from Inequalities within 10 seconds. In every exam, at least 5 questions are asked from this topic.

Points to remember   



King is more powerful than Soldiers Soldiers are more powerful than Public Whenever there is a conflict between two Kings, then there will be no conclusion When there is a conflict between two soldiers, then there will be no conclusion

Let King means < or >

Soldier means ≥ or ≤

Public means =

Case 1. 'King vs King'

Suppose there is a war going on between two kings.Whenever the two kings faces each other means war. In other words conclusion will be wrong. Note: Two signs opposite to each other will make the conclusion wrong But again if the signs are in same manner that will not make it wrong. like this If A > B < C > D then A < C = False , C > A = False . But If E > F > G > H then E > G = True , F > H = True , E > H = True. Statement: A < D > C < E > B Conclusions:  C > B → False  A < E → False  D > B → False 

In simple way ,Whenever these two sign comes in opposite direction the answer will be false. Case 2. ' Soldier vs Soldier'

Whenever the soldiers face each other means again war(same apply here). In other words conclusion will be wrong. Note: Two signs opposite to each other will make the conclusion wrong But again if the signs are same then it will be true. like this If A ≥ B ≤C then A ≤ C = False , C ≥ A = False . But If A ≥ B ≥ C then A ≥ C = True , C ≤ A = True . Example

Statement: B ≥ D ≤ A ≥ F ≤ C Conclusions : I. A ≥ C → False II. B ≤ F → False III. D ≥ C → False Case 3. Sets Priority: If they all are comes in order then kings’ priority will be first ,soldier's second and public at last.

Statement: P ≥ R > Q = T ≥ S Conclusions : I. P ≥ Q → False II. P > Q → True III. Q ≥ S → True Case 4. When it occurs to you that the statement of order is opposite just change the sign into similar opposite direction Change the sign into similar opposite /corresponding / alternative direction . If A > B > F > C < D < E than F < A → True [ ∵ A > B > F = F < B < A ] Example:

Statements : A>B>F>C; D>E>C Conclusions: I. C < A → True II. C > A → False Statements : R ≥ S ≥ T > U > X ; T < V X → True [Note: Apply Case 3 here ] II. X < R → True [Note: Apply Case 3 & 4 here ] Statements : K ≤ L ≤ M = N ; P ≥ O ≥N Conclusions: K≤ L≤M=N≤O≤P

III. K ≤ M → True IV K < P → False V K = P → False Statement IV & V Apply Either Or

Case 5. Protocols

There are some rules in battle field which is that king only fights with king and soldier only fights with soldier. So Whenever you find two conclusions which are false Just check for these two symbols.In Most of case where two conclusions are false and these two similar signs are not there respectively then that statement

you can call it as Either Or but should check there variable it should same. #Case Either Or : Note : First thing you need to check whether in your conclusion any 2 or more conclusions are wrong then if it is there then check whether the two variables are same If It happens then write it as 'Either or' but after checking their symbols. Rules: 1. Both conclusion should False 2. Should have Same Predicate or Variable 3. Check the symbols If 3 Condition is satisfied then write it as " Either Or' Other wise leave it.

Solved Questions :

#Case Neither Nor :

There are some rules in battle field which is that king only fights with king and soldier only fights with soldier. So Whenever you find two conclusions which are false Just check for these two symbols.In Most of case where two conclusions are false and these two signs are not there respectively then that statement you can call it as Neither Nor. Note : First thing you need to check whether in your conclusion any 2 or more conclusions are wrong

then write it as 'Neither Nor' but before checking their symbols. Rules: 1. Both conclusion should False 2. Check the symbols If Both Conditions are satisfied then write it as " Neither Nor' Other wise leave it.

How to solve 'Either Or' & 'Neither Nor' Question

Coded Inequalities - Logical Reasoning Part 1 Coded Inequalities is one of simplest topic in logical reasoning section. But without proper rules and understanding we find it difficult to solve We can expect 3 to 5 questions based on this topic in competition exams .So we come up with two parts series on coded inequalities. In coded inequalities statement/expression consists of a group of elements along with the relationship among them, which may be given in coded form. Before we start the discussing on the steps to be followed for solving these questions lets check the meaning of certain symbols first in below :A>B means A is greater than B A
A≥B means A is either greater than B or A is equal to B A≤B means A is less than B or A is equal to B For these expression we find that > Greater < less = Equal ≥ greater than or equal ≤ less than or equal It is very important to understand the meaning of these operators now we try to find out conclusion from given statements:A>B>C means B>C(A is greater than B, C ) A≥B>C means A,B are greater than C and A can be greater than B or equal to C A=B>C means A and B are equal and greater than C (A>C) AC or A=C) A≤B>C means we can’t find any relation between A and C A>B
Exercise : 1.Statement X>Y≥Z Conclusion: 1.Z>Y 2.Y=Z Solution : From this statement X is greater than Y and Z and Y is greater or either equal to Z So from this Second conclusion is correct . Answer :2 2.Statement D≥E>F=G Conclusion 1.D>G 2.F>G Solution: From this statement F is equal to G E is greater than F D is either greater than or equal to E So from this we can conclude than D>G Answer :1 3. Statement B>J≥R>Z Conclusion 1.J>Z

2.J=Z Solution: From this statement R is greater than Z and J is either greater than or equal to R Sp J is greater than Z Answer :1.

1 reasoning inequality trick.pdf

Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. 1 reasoning inequality trick.pdf. 1 reasoning inequality trick.pdf.

595KB Sizes 2 Downloads 310 Views

Recommend Documents

Reasoning - 1 Oct.pdf
I. Some force are definitely not pipe. II. No cold is a force. Page 1 of 12 ... Reasoning - 1 Oct.pdf. Reasoning - 1 Oct.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Reasoning-Sample-Paper-1.pdf
Each vowel of the word GLADIOLUS is substituted with. the next letter of the English alphabetical series, and each. consonant is substituted with the letter preceding it. How many. vowels are present in the new arrangement? (1) None (2) One (3) Two (

Experimental Violation of a Spin-1 Bell Inequality ... - UCSB Physics
Jan 21, 2002 - pulsed, type-II, stimulated parametric down-conversion. This is a violation of the ..... Combining all these data we arrive at a single value, S.

Reasoning - PhilPapers
high degree (cf. ..... Other times, it is not an abbreviation: by 'a good F', we mean something that is .... McHugh (2014), McHugh and Way (2016 b), Howard (ms.).

Reasoning behind Strategic Levels 1 and 2.pdf
alternative within Sheffield other than going to the Inner Ring Road and out. along one of the A roads. It benefits single and multi-stop journeys within. Sheffield ...

Reasoning-Solved-Paper-2-1.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.

Undoing effect in causal reasoning 1 Submitted for ...
Email: [email protected]. .... People attempt this, for example, whenever they wonder "if only...". ..... They were obtained by advertising on various.

A Logic for Reasoning about Persuasion 1. Introduction
... Ministry of Science and Higher Education under Białystok University of Technology ... such types of persuasion, we assign to beliefs various degrees of uncertainty. ...... a leader of a group of agents or is a specialist, then his arguments have

Mathematical Critical Reasoning (35 Minutes) 1. A ... -
After 6 hours, an express train leaves the ... four hours, then what is the speed of the goods train? .... them to live a better life than most people of that time,.

Undoing effect in causal reasoning 1 Submitted for ...
affords a prediction about how people reason when asked counterfactual ... The appeal to causal analysis does not solve all the problems of induction. In fact ...

CMAT Logical Reasoning SET 1.pdf
Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. CMAT Logical Reasoning SET 1.pdf. CMAT Logical Reasoning SET 1.pdf.

Notes on Practical Reasoning - COGENCY | Journal of Reasoning ...
cess of reasoning. Something written down, for example. I don't want to confuse the process with the product, so I here use “reasoning” just for the process. The product of reasoning might be a linear sequence of ..... evidence against them (Lord

automated reasoning
as programming language and as logical language [20, 43]. .... logic programming language. ..... In M D Agostino, D Gabbay, R Haehnle, and J Posegga, editors ...

proportional reasoning
9, May 2011 ○ MATHEMATICS TEACHING IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL 545 p of proportion occur in geometry, .... in your notebook. Use your estimation skills to ...

Quantitative Reasoning
of both raw and derived quantitative data. Expertly recognizes and differentiates between raw and derived data, and expertly appraises the appropriateness of .... literacy skills. Competently describes and explains the processes and results applying

Reasoning
high degree (cf. ..... Other times, it is not an abbreviation: by 'a good F', we mean something that is .... McHugh (2014), McHugh and Way (2016 b), Howard (ms.).

Within-Firm Pay Inequality - NYU
Jan 20, 2017 - †NYU Stern School of Business, NBER, CEPR, and ECGI. .... (2016) find that pay inequality results in lower output and lower attendance. .... of firm-level pay trends in the UK, providing its data to various public entities, such as.

Inequality and ability
explain very little of the increase in inequality, technology is suspected to be responsible .... indicate that the OLS returns to mental skills and education are biased downward in the ... E.D. Gould / Labour Economics 12 (2005) 169–189. 171 ...

Within-Firm Pay Inequality - NYU
Jan 20, 2017 - for valuable comments. We are grateful to Raymond Story at Income Data Services (IDS) for help with the data. †NYU Stern School of Business, ...

Inequality Word Problems.pdf
Sign in. Page. 1. /. 9. Loading… Page 1 of 9. Page 1 of 9. Page 2 of 9. Page 2 of 9. Page 3 of 9. Page 3 of 9. Inequality Word Problems.pdf. Inequality Word Problems.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Inequality Word Prob

Measuring horizontal inequality
Jan 29, 2016 - bcp(δ1,δ2)+(a − d − e)(b + c)p(δ1/2,δ2/2) + (be + cd)p(δ1,δ2/2) +. +edp(δ1,0) + (a − d − e)(d + e)p(δ1/2,0). Axiom 1 demands I(y1,x2) ≥ I(x1,x2) ...