CHATHAM SITE PRP GROUP RAP TRUST 1322 Scott Street, Suite 104 San Diego, CA 92106 (619)-546-8377 (619)-546-9980 FAX Email:
[email protected]
Via Email December 22, 2015 Mr. Hossein Nassiri CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL 5796 Corporate Ave Cypress, CA 90630-4732 Subject: Feasibility Evaluation Felicita Creek, Chatham Site, Escondido, California Dear Mr. Nassiri: This letter transmits the above-referenced document, which is being submitted to address the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) comments related to Felicita Creek, Felicita County Park, Escondido, California. More specifically, DTSC comments were provided on March 26, 2013 which conditionally approved the revised version of the 5-year Remedy Review Report (RRR) dated August 24, 2012. As part of the RRR conditional approval, DTSC requested further evaluation of Felicita Creek. Since this time, the Chatham Site PRP Group (the Group) has further evaluated the conditions at Felicita Creek with additional surface water sampling and conducting meetings with stakeholders including the DTSC, RWQCB, US Army Corps of Engineers, and County of San Diego. The overall sampling at Felicita Creek and results of stakeholders meetings are included within the enclosed document. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact either Mike Palmer or me. Sincerely, Chatham Site PRP Group RAP Trust
Edward D. Modiano Project Coordinator Enclosure cc (with enclosure):
Mr. Hossein Nassiri, DTSC (Via Email) Mr. Theo Johnson, DTSC (Via Email) Mr. Sean McClain, RWQCB (Via Email) Mr. Kevin Heaton, DEH (Via Email) Mr. Emad Yamut, DTSC (Via Email)
724 H01_2015-2_PRP_txs_FC FE
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. HYDROGEOLOGY ENGINEERING
La Jolla Gateway 9171 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 375 San Diego, CA 92122 Phone: 858.455.6500 Fax: 858.455.6533
December 21, 2015 VIA EMAIL Mr. Edward D. Modiano Project Coordinator CHATHAM SITE PRP GROUP RAP TRUST 1322 Scott Street, Suite 104 San Diego, CA 92106 Re:
Transmittal of Feasibility Evaluation Felicita Creek, Chatham Site, Escondido, California
Dear Mr. Modiano: Enclosed is the document titled: Feasibility Evaluation Felicita Creek Chatham Site Escondido, California If you have any questions or comments, please contact us. Sincerely, HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Christopher G.A. Ross, PG 4594, CHG 221 Principal Hydrogeologist
James D. Schwall, PE CH5044 Principal Engineer
CGAR/JDS/ama Enclosure
724_H01_2015-2_HA_Txs_FC FE.docx
Other Offices: Folsom, CA Mesa, AZ Tucson, AZ
DECEMBER 21, 2015
FEASIBILITY EVALUATION FELICITA CREEK CHATHAM SITE ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR: CHATHAM SITE PRP GROUP
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. HYDROGEOLOGY ENGINEERING
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
FEASIBILITY EVALUATION FELICITA CREEK CHATHAM SITE ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2 SITE BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Location and Creek History ............................................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Flow ........................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Results ..................................................... 4 1.2.3.1 Site-Related Contaminants ..................................................................................... 4 1.2.3.2 Non-Site Related Constituents and Compounds .................................................... 5 1.2.4 Conceptual Site Model Summary ................................................................................... 7 1.2.4.1 Groundwater to the North and Vicinity of Felicita County Park .............................. 7 1.2.4.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Vicinity of Felicita County Park........................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.4.3 Felicita Creek ........................................................................................................... 9 1.3 SUMMARY OF RISK ASSESSMENTS – HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 EVALUATION GOALS .......................................................................................................... 11 2.0 REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FELICITA CREEK .......................................................... 13 2.1 IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES ........................ 13 2.2 POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES DESCRIPTIONS................................................................ 14 2.3 SCREENING CRITERIA ....................................................................................................... 16 2.4 RETAINED REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES .......................................................................... 17 3.0 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................. 18 3.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA ..................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ....................................................... 18 3.1.2 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.3 Implementability............................................................................................................. 19 3.1.4 Cost................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.5 Water Resource Preservation ....................................................................................... 19 3.2 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES................................................................. 20
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
i
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Section
Page
3.2.1 Alternative FC1: Current Monitoring and Contingency Plan (Baseline) ...................... 20 3.2.1.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ............................................... 21 3.2.1.2 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... 21 3.2.1.3 Implementability..................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1.4 Cost........................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.1.5 Water Resource Preservation ............................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Alternative FC2: Ex Situ Treatment – Enhanced Volatilization ................................... 23 3.2.2.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ............................................... 25 3.2.2.2 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... 26 3.2.2.3 Implementability..................................................................................................... 26 3.2.2.4 Cost........................................................................................................................ 28 3.2.2.5 Water Resource Preservation ............................................................................... 28 3.2.3 Alternative FC3A: Hydraulic Containment with Treated Water to Surface Water....... 28 3.2.3.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ............................................... 29 3.2.3.2 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... 29 3.2.3.3 Implementability..................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3.4 Cost........................................................................................................................ 31 3.2.3.5 Water Resource Preservation ............................................................................... 32 3.2.4 Alternative FC3B: Hydraulic Containment with Treated Water to Subsurface............ 32 3.2.4.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ............................................... 33 3.2.4.2 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... 33 3.2.4.3 Implementability..................................................................................................... 33 3.2.4.4 Cost........................................................................................................................ 35 3.2.4.5 Water Resource Preservation ............................................................................... 35 3.2.5 Alternative FC3C: Hydraulic Containment with Non-Potable Reuse .......................... 35 3.2.5.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment ............................................... 35 3.2.5.2 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................... 36 3.2.5.3 Implementability..................................................................................................... 36 3.2.5.4 Cost........................................................................................................................ 37 3.2.5.5 Water Resource Preservation ............................................................................... 37 4.0 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................... 38 5.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 41
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
ii
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
TABLES Table 1
PREVALENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND 1,4-DIOXANE IN GROUNDWATER IN FELICITA PARK
2
DETECTED INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES, FELICITA PARK
3
PREVALENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND 1,4-DIOXANE IN SURFACE WATER
4
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN SURFACE WATER
5
FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING
6
SUMMARY OF RETAINED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
7
HYDRAULIC CONTAINMENT DISPOSAL OPTIONS ANALYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE FC3
FIGURES Figure 1
Drawing Number SITE LOCATION
410-9526 A
2A
FELICITA CREEK LOCATION
410-9538 A
2B
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS, WATER TABLE WELLS, OCTOBER 2015
220-2306 A
3
TRICHLOROETHYLENE, WATER TABLE WELLS, OCTOBER 2015
210-4674 A
4
TRICHLOROETHYLENE, DEEP WELLS, OCTOBER 2015
210-4675 A
5
TRICHLOROETHYLENE, FELICITA CREEK SAMPLING LOCATIONS, FELICITA COUNTY PARK
210-4677 A
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
iii
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
FIGURES (continued) Figure
Drawing Number
6
CONCEPTUAL CROSS SECTION ALONG FELICITA CREEK
7
TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN FELICITA CREEK SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS FC-4 AND FC-7, AND FLOWRATE AT FC-7, OCTOBER 1994 TO OCTOBER 2015
--
TRICHLOROETHYLENE CONCENTRATIONS, MONITOR WELLS MW-46 AND MW-69, AUGUST 1994 TO OCTOBER 2015
--
TRICHLOROETHYLENE CONCENTRATIONS, MONITOR WELLS MW-58 AND MW-66, SEPTEMBER 1999 TO OCTOBER 2015
--
8
9
810-2736
10A
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN EX SITU TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
810-2740 A
10B
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLACEMENT OF EX SITU TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
410-9543 A
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN HYDRAULIC CONTAINMENT ALTERNATIVES
560-0359 A
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLACEMENT OF HYDRAULIC CONTAINMENT ALTERNATIVES
410-9542 A
11A
11B
APPENDICES Appendix A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS, MAY 2015
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
iv
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CD CEQA CSM DTSC EHD EPA ERAS GRS FCP H+A HSA LGAC MCLs MCP ml MPN NPDES PRP RAP RI RRR RWQCB SWRBTLs TCE TDS the Group the Site the Yard USACE VOCs WDR
Consent Decree California Environmental Quality Act Conceptual Site Model California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control Environmental Health Decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Risk Assessment Section Groundwater remediation system Felicita County Park Hargis + Associates, Inc. Felicita Hydrologic Subarea Liquid phase granular activated carbon Maximum Contaminant Levels Monitoring and Contingency Plan Milliliter Most probable number National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Chatham Site Potentially Responsible Parties Remedial Action Plan Remedial Investigation Remedy Review Report Regional Water Quality Control Board Surface water risk-based trigger levels Trichloroethylene Total dissolved solids PRP Group Chatham Site located at 2257 Bernardo Avenue, Escondido, California The Chatham Yard United States Army Corps of Engineers Volatile organic compounds General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Treated Groundwater from Volatile Organic Compound Cleanup Sites to Land in the San Diego Region
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
v
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
FEASIBILITY EVALUATION FELICITA CREEK CHATHAM SITE ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Feasibility Evaluation has been prepared by Hargis + Associates, Inc., on behalf of the Chatham Site Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group (the Group) for the Chatham Site1 located at 2257 Bernardo Avenue, Escondido, California (Figure ES-1). The Group continues to successfully implement the selected groundwater remedy described in the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)-approved Remedial Action Plan in accordance with the Consent Decree (CD) between the DTSC and the Group entered by the federal district court on February 5, 1999. Per the CD, Remedy Review Reports (RRR) are submitted to DTSC every 5-years with the most recent RRR originally being submitted on June 29, 2010. Revised versions of the RRR, which addressed agency comments, were submitted to DTSC on September 29, 2011 and August 24, 2012. Conditional approval of the RRR was provided by DTSC in a letter dated March 26, 2013, in which one of the conditions of approval was to further evaluate site related contaminants detected in Felicita Creek. With this understanding, this Feasibility Evaluation assesses remedial alternatives to manage flow of site related contaminants in groundwater to Felicita Creek.
The Site is within the Felicita Hydrologic Subarea (HSA), a south-sloping elongate basin drained by Felicita Creek. The upper reaches of Felicita Creek, including the West and East Forks are located within the site area and converge in the northern portion of Felicita Creek (Figure ES-2). 1
The “Site” shall include the areal extent of any known or suspected release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant originating at the Yard (as defined herein). The Site includes but is not limited to a 5-acre portion of real property commonly known as the Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard located at 2257 Bernardo Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the “Yard”), Escondido, California, which is part of a 35-acre parcel (the “Property”), as well as property located at 1261 Gamble Lane (the “Gamble Lane Property”), Escondido, California.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
ES-1
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (continued) The primary Site-related contaminants in groundwater and surface water at the Site consist of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Both the Group and DTSC have conducted risk analyses of Felicita Creek and concluded that Site-related contaminants levels within Felicita Creek are protective of human health and the environment.
In the vicinity of the Yard, pumping of the groundwater remediation system extraction wells has created an effective capture zone, restricting contaminant migration downgradient. To the south of the Yard, VOCs dissolved in groundwater continue to dissipate through the physical process of natural attenuation (Figures ES-3 and ES-4).
Groundwater data suggest that the lower
volume, higher concentration VOC mass in the deep zone contributes to the VOC mass in the shallow zone through localized upward gradients primarily in Felicita County Park. Overall the rate of VOC mass contribution from deeper to shallow groundwater is constrained by the lower bulk hydraulic conductivity of the deep zone.
Surface water in Felicita Creek derives from two major sources: 1) overland flow and tributary streams following rainfall events, and 2) groundwater flow into the channel where the channel is incised to the water table (Figure ES-5). Site-related VOCs are not present in overland flow of surface water, so Site-related VOC contributions to Felicita Creek are from groundwater flow into the creek channel.
From just downstream of the Felicita Road culvert, groundwater
containing dissolved VOCs is intercepted by the Creek channel incised to below the water table (Figures ES-5 and ES-6).
Aside from VOCs, however, Felicita Creek is impaired with respect to its designated beneficial uses due to non-Site related constituents. Non-Site related inorganic water quality constituents were consistently detected in surface water samples collected in 2013 through 2015, and some exceeded Basin Plan water quality objectives for one or more surface water samples collected. In addition, Felicita Creek has been designated as an “impaired” water body under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Felicita Creek is on the 303(d) list since Felicita Creek fails to meet Basin Plan water quality objectives, due to adverse impacts by non-Site related pollutants, total dissolved solids, and aluminum.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
ES-2
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (continued)
Potential remedial technologies and a screening of remedial technologies were presented and discussed in a technical meeting with DTSC, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and representatives of the Group on April 20, 2015. Based on the initial technical meeting, two additional technical meetings were held on August 19, 2015 with RWQCB, DTSC, United States Army Corps of Engineers, and representatives of the Group and on August 25, 2015 with RWQCB, County of San Diego, and representatives of the Group to discuss remedial technology implementability issues to assist in the development of the Feasibility Evaluation.
Remedial technologies were screened and the retained technologies were assembled into the following remedial alternatives: FC1: Current Monitoring and Contingency Plan; FC2: Ex situ surface water treatment within Felicita Creek via installation of structures; and FC3: Hydraulic containment (pump and treat with liquid phase granular activated carbon adsorption treatment) with three treated groundwater end use options – FC3A treated water to Felicita Creek, FC3B treated water to subsurface; and FC3C treated water as non-potable reuse.
Each remedial alternative was evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria: protection of human health and the environment; effectiveness; implementability; cost; and preservation of the water resource. The remedial alternatives were compared based on their respective performance in achieving the evaluation criteria (Table ES-1). The remedial alternatives are protective of human health and the environment. Based on this analysis, remedial alternatives FC-2 and FC-3 provide slight to moderate reduction of Site-related VOCs in Felicita Creek. It is equally clear remedial alternatives FC-2 and FC-3 are complex processes to implement and highly disruptive. FC-1 is the preferred alternative. It is protective of human health and the environment, it is implementable while the other alternatives may not be due to permitting limitation. FC-1 is least disruptive and preserves the water resource.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
ES-3
TABLE ES-1 FELICITA CREEK FEASIBILITY EVALUATION SUMMARY
ALTERNATIVE
ALTERNATIVE DESCRIPTION
PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
EFFECTIVENESS
Current concentrations detected in VOC reduction rate in Felicita Creek have not exceeded Felicita Creek limited by any of the SWRBTLs and risk natural processes. VOC analyses for Felicita Creek concluded reduction not achieved until that Site-related contaminants within creek water reaches Felicita Creek are protective of southern portion of park. human health and the environment
FC1
Monitor in accordance with MCP
FC2
In–Situ Treatment – Enhanced volatilization of VOCs through installation of structures in Felicita Creek
Same as FC1
Some improvement compared to FC1 (less than 50%)
IMPLEMENTABILITY
RELATIVE COST
WATER RESOURCE PRESERVATION
Currently being implemented
There is no additional cost associated with this alternative
Preserves the flow in Felicita Creek
Difficult to implement due to difficult permitting process
Moderate to high
Preserves flow in Felicita Creek
Felicita Creek Hydraulic Containment - consisting of extraction wells and groundwater treatment with Liquid Phase Carbon Adsorption (see below for treated water end use options) A: Stream Disposal - Return VOC-treated groundwater to Felicita Creek to maintain stream flow
FC3
B: Subsurface Disposal Return VOC-treated groundwater to subsurface by construction of infiltration trench structure(s) to recharge treated water
C: Non-potable end use - Irrigation Reuse
Same as FC1
Potentially effective for capturing and treating area along Felicita Creek
Cannot be implemented due to the natural inorganic water quality/permit requirements
Same as FC1
Similar to FC3A except potential for short circuiting between infiltration and extraction
Difficult to implement due to difficult access requirements and potentially difficult permitting process
Moderate to high
Same as FC1
Similar to FC3A except Can not be implemented shorter duration of due to lack of irrigation operation due to changes in demand in park seasonal demand
Moderate to high
MCP Monitoring and Contingency Plan VOCs Volatile organic compounds SWRBTLs Surface Water Risk-Based Tigger Levels
724_H01_2015-2_ES_Tbl01.xlsx
Page 1 of 1
Moderate to high
Preserves flow in Felicita Creek Preserves Felicita Creek flow with potential small loss of flow in the creek if increased evapotranspiration in vicinity of trench(es) Potential moderate loss of extracted water due to evapotranspiration in irrigated areas resulting in some loss of flow in Felicita Creek
FIGURE ES-1. SITE LOCATION
ES-2
FIGURE ES-3
FIGURE ES-4
FIGURE 6. FIGURE ES-5.
FIGURE ES-6.
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
FEASIBILITY EVALUATION FELICITA CREEK CHATHAM SITE ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document has been prepared by Hargis + Associates, Inc. (H+A), on behalf of the Chatham Site Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group (the Group) for the Chatham Site1 located at 2257 Bernardo Avenue, Escondido, California (the Site) (Figure 1).
The Group continues to
successfully implement the selected groundwater remedy described in the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)-approved Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (DTSC, 1998) in accordance with the Consent Decree (CD) between the DTSC and the Group entered by the federal district court on February 5, 1999. In accordance with the CD, Remedy Review Reports (RRR) are submitted to DTSC every 5-years with the most recent RRR originally being submitted on June 29, 2010. Revised versions of the RRR, which addressed agency comments, were submitted to DTSC on September 29, 2011 and August 24, 2012. The primary purpose for the RRR is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the groundwater remedy. Conditional approval of the RRR was provided by DTSC in a letter dated March 26, 2013, in which one of the conditions of approval was to further evaluate site related contaminants detected in Felicita Creek.
With this understanding, this Feasibility Evaluation
assesses remedial alternatives to manage flow of site related contaminants in groundwater to Felicita Creek.
1
The “Site” shall include the areal extent of any known or suspected release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant originating at the Yard (as defined herein). The Site includes but is not limited to a 5-acre portion of real property commonly known as the Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard located at 2257 Bernardo Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the “Yard”), Escondido, California, which is part of a 35-acre parcel (the “Property”), as well as property located at 1261 Gamble Lane (the “Gamble Lane Property”), Escondido, California.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
1
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Feasibility Evaluation assesses remedial alternatives to manage the flow of Site-related contaminants to Felicita Creek in response to a letter from the DTSC dated September 24, 2014, regarding the April 2014 Annual Monitoring Submittal and Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Update (H+A, 2014a; DTSC, 2014b).
More specifically, DTSC General Comment #3
recommends that “the PRP Group evaluate the contaminant fate and transport mechanisms and hydrogeology of site related contaminants discharging into Felicita Creek.
The evaluation
should address mechanisms which would significantly reduce or stop the flow of site related contaminants to the creek.” The evaluation of contaminant fate and transport mechanisms including groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Site and Felicita Creek were presented in previous documents including the most recent CSM Update (H+A, 2015b).
This Feasibility Evaluation presents the following:
Introduction
Site Background
Summary of Previous Risk Assessment
Evaluation Goals
Screening of Remedial Technologies
Remedial Alternatives Analysis
Comparison of Remedial Alternatives
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND
The following sections summarize the general background and elements of the CSM that pertain to groundwater and surface water flow and quality in the vicinity of Felicita Creek.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
2
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
1.2.1 Location and Creek History The Site is within the Felicita Hydrologic Subarea (HSA), a south-sloping elongate basin drained by Felicita Creek.
Granitic rock underlies the Felicita HSA, the bulk of it being fractured
bedrock, but the uppermost portion is gradually weathered to decomposed granitic rock at various depths.
The Chatham Yard is located near the upper reaches of both the West Fork and a branch of the East Fork of Felicita Creek. The East and West Forks converge in the northern portion of Felicita County Park (FCP) (Figure 2A).
The natural channels of Felicita Creek have been altered over time by the placement of culverts, allowing streets to cross the creek; by channelization in the upper stretch of the West Fork of the Creek west of Bernardo Avenue and portions of the upper East Fork west of Felicita Road; and by the placement of a small earth-fill dam on the East Fork of the creek at Felicita Road, as well as the placement of a series of stonework check-dams within FCP. The stonework dams were placed in the 1930s, and the earth-fill dam predates the 1950s.
1.2.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Flow Groundwater flows through fractures in bedrock at depth, and flows through the more porous decomposed bedrock nearer to land surface, under the influence of the regional hydraulic gradient (H+A, 1996). Groundwater data indicate that subsurface conditions, combined with topography and significant narrowing of the Valley to the south, results in convergence of groundwater flow toward the center of the basin formed by Felicita Creek (Figure 2A).
Surface water occurs primarily in the East and West Forks of Felicita Creek, as well as its main channel downstream of the confluence of the East and West Forks in FCP (Figures 2A and 2B). Groundwater appears to be the source of base flow to Felicita Creek in the northern portion of FCP, where flow becomes perennial in the East Fork of the Creek. Stretches of the West Fork of Felicita Creek appear to be perennial, but for much of the year the West Fork does not persist downstream as surface flow to the confluence with the East Fork. Several ephemeral streams are tributaries to Felicita Creek, flowing only when there is seasonal surface runoff (H+A, 1996).
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
3
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Surface water flow is typically highest in March/April after the rainy season and is lowest in September/October during the dry season when the flow in Felicita Creek is principally base flow from groundwater.
1.2.3 Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Results Groundwater and surface water have been monitored for Site related contaminants and other non-Site related constituents and compounds.
1.2.3.1 Site-Related Contaminants The primary Site-related contaminants exceeding drinking water Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) in groundwater and surface water at the Site consist of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The lateral and vertical extent of VOC groundwater contamination is well defined based on the sampling of 60 key wells in the monitoring program, including shallow monitor wells, deep monitor wells, shallow and deep regional wells, and extraction wells.
From
groundwater VOC data collected over the last 20 years, the lateral and vertical extent of groundwater contamination is depicted as shallow and deep plumes, with changes tracked over time (Figures 3 and 4). Details of VOC distribution in groundwater have been provided as part of the groundwater monitoring program, most recently for October 2015 (H+A, 2015c). Within the geographical area addressed in this Feasibility Evaluation, specifically FCP, recent VOC analytical data have been summarized (Table 1).
An expanded surface water sampling program has been implemented on a semiannual basis from April 2013 through October 2015 (H+A, 2015c). Recent VOC analytical data for surface water have been summarized (Table 3). VOCs were not detected in surface water samples collected from West Fork sampling locations in April 2015 or October 2015. These results are consistent with historic analytical results of surface water samples collected by the Group from the West Fork of Felicita Creek. VOCs detected in surface water samples collected from the East Fork and main channel of Felicita Creek in October 2015 remained within historic ranges. Using trichloroethylene (TCE) as an indicator compound due to its prevalence, concentrations decrease downstream from the vicinity of surface water sampling location FC-4 until reaching
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
4
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
the vicinity of surface water sampling locations FC-7 and FC-8A, where the TCE concentrations were near or below the detection limit (Figure 5).
Results of historic and recent sampling confirm that surface water flow in Felicita Creek is fed by groundwater, and it is expected that surface water in Felicita Creek will respond over time to reductions in VOC concentrations in shallow groundwater as natural attenuation of the groundwater plume progresses near the creek (H+A, 2015b).
1.2.3.2 Non-Site Related Constituents and Compounds Inorganic water quality of shallow and deep groundwater was characterized as part of the Remedial Investigation (RI) (H+A, 1996). Initial sampling of monitor wells installed during the RI included analysis of inorganic constituents, including chloride, nitrate, sulfate, total dissolved solids (TDS), and selected metals. Based on sampling of upgradient and other wells outside the area of VOC impact to groundwater, the RI found that:
Chloride, sulfate, [TDS], and nitrate concentrations detected in the background wells exceeded federal and/or state Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) . . .
Based on the similarity of the concentration range for chloride, sulfate, TDS, and nitrate between background wells and other wells, these compounds appear to be representative of regional conditions and are not related to historical operations conducted at the site. (H+A, 1996)
In May 2015, additional groundwater sampling was conducted using monitor wells located in the vicinity of Felicita Creek within FCP, in order to update and expand the characterization of inorganic water quality near the creek. Shallow monitor wells MW-53, MW-54 and MW-58, as well as deep monitor wells MW-66 and MW-70, were sampled on May 21, 2015 (Figures 3 and 4).
Groundwater samples were analyzed for common ions, TDS, surfactants, metals
including mercury and hexavalent chromium, chlorinated phenolics, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, semi-volatile organic compounds, cyanide, hardness, sodium, and hydrogen sulfide. Most of these analytes were not detected (Appendix A). Concentrations of detected analytes have been provided, and compared with applicable regulatory standards for surface water
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
5
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
(Table 2). Concentrations of chloride, nitrate, sulfate and TDS were generally comparable to those in RI samples, and also exceeded regulatory levels, specifically Basin Plan Water Quality Objectives, in some or all sampled wells (Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB], 2012). Other constituents exceeding regulatory standards in 2015 were iron, manganese, and total nitrogen, which exceeded instantaneous maximum effluent limitations under the San Diego National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Table 2).
Inorganic surface water quality was characterized as part of the RI (H+A, 1996). Analysis of surface water samples collected from surface water sampling location FC-4 in 1994 included analysis of general minerals and coliform bacteria. The RI found that:
Results of general mineral analyses indicate that surface water is a sodium-calcium-sulfate water type with a TDS content of 1,290 mg/l [milligrams per liter], which is consistent with general mineral data obtained from groundwater sampling of monitor wells in the vicinity of the site. (H+A, 1996)
The naturally-occurring inorganic water quality constituents TDS, chloride, sulfate, nitrate and turbidity were detected in surface water samples collected in October 2015 (Table 4). Concentrations of these constituents at surface water sampling location FC-4 were comparable to those detected in 1994 and, with the exception of nitrate, exceeded Basin Plan water quality objectives for one or both surface water samples collected in 2015 (RWQCB, 2012). These results indicate that Felicita Creek is impaired with respect to its designated beneficial uses due to naturally occurring, and therefore non-Site related, constituents.
Total coliform bacteria were detected in surface water samples collected at surface water sampling locations FC-4 and FC-10 in April 2015, at populations of 1,600 most probable number (MPN)/100 milliliters (ml) (Table 4). This exceeds the water quality standard of 200 MPN/100ml specified for fecal coliform bacteria, and was higher than the detection of 130 MPN/100ml at surface water sampling location FC-4 in 1994. Although the Basin Plan requires 5 sampling events for fecal coliform within 30 days to establish a reliable bacterial population (RWQCB, 2012), this result is consistent with previous sampling results and with the interpretation that Felicita Creek may be impaired with respect to its designated beneficial uses
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
6
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
due to high bacterial levels. The presence of coliform bacteria in Felicita Creek is a result of animal and human activity, and is not Site related.
1.2.4 Conceptual Site Model Summary As stated previously, the primary contaminants in groundwater at the Site consist of VOCs with the lateral and vertical extent being well defined based on the ongoing monitoring program. The following sections provide an overview of the CSM as it pertains to: groundwater to the north and in the vicinity of FCP; groundwater and surface water interaction in the vicinity of FCP; and Felicita Creek.
1.2.4.1 Groundwater to the North and Vicinity of Felicita County Park In the vicinity of the Yard, pumping of the groundwater remediation system (GRS) extraction wells has created an effective capture zone in this area, restricting contaminant migration downgradient. Since implementation of the remedy, concentration decreases to near or below detection limits in shallow monitor wells between the Yard and Cimarron Terrace demonstrate the separation of the shallow VOC plume (H+A, 2015b). Since implementation of the remedy, concentration decreases to near or below detection limits in deep monitor wells between the Yard and Hamilton Lane, as well as the order of magnitude decrease in VOC concentrations in axial deep monitor well MW-67, demonstrate the separation of the deep VOC plume by operation of the GRS for containment.
To the south of the Yard, downgradient of the capture zone, as groundwater with dissolved VOCs slowly migrates south, the VOCs continue to dissipate through physical processes of natural attenuation. South of Hamilton Lane, the shallow and deep plumes consist of low and generally decreasing concentrations of dissolved VOCs extending to the south end of FCP (Figures 3 and 4). Migration of the shallow and deep groundwater plumes is generally narrow and controlled by Site topography, geologic features, and groundwater flow. Groundwater data suggest that the lower volume, higher concentration VOC mass in the deep zone contributes to the VOC mass in the shallow zone through localized upward gradients primarily in the northern portion of FCP and the vicinity of monitor wells MW-54 and MW-70 in the southern portion of
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
7
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
FCP. But overall the rate of VOC mass contribution from deeper to shallow groundwater is constrained by the lower bulk hydraulic conductivity of the deep zone.
1.2.4.2 Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Vicinity of Felicita County Park In the vicinity of FCP, an evaluation of the water quality of Felicita Creek and its relationship to local groundwater has been provided (H+A, 2015a).
The results of this evaluation are
summarized as follows:
In the northern portion of FCP, Felicita Creek is a gaining stream.
Groundwater is the primary source of water to the stream, especially during the dry season.
The groundwater daylighting into the Felicita Creek channel moves through decomposed granitic rock rather than through discrete fractures in bedrock (Figure 6).
Understanding that this is a water table system in decomposed and fractured bedrock, it is likely that a proportion of groundwater flowing into the Felicita Creek channel is via upward vertical flow from the deep VOC plume, through decomposed granitic rock, between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10.
Between surface water sampling locations FC-10 and FC-7, TCE concentrations decline to below drinking water standards.
VOCs in surface water do not persist beyond the southern boundary of FCP, which is itself over a mile from the Creek’s outflow to Lake Hodges (Figures 3 through 5).
Surface water sampling in 2013 through 2015 was representative of low flow or base flow conditions.
From both groundwater and surface water data, it appears TCE concentrations detected in samples collected at and near surface water sampling location FC-4 are responsive to variations in local conditions, including the water table elevation, temperature, depth of water in the creek channel, and velocity of surface water flow.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
8
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
An evaluation of water quality trends of groundwater and surface water in the vicinity of Felicita Creek has been provided with respect to VOCs (H+A, 2015a) (Figures 7 through 9). The Group has presented water quality data indicating that, as a result of the remedy at the Chatham Yard, the mass of the shallow VOC plume south of Hamilton Lane has decreased by approximately 90 percent (H+A, 2015b).
The shallow TCE plume continues to contract, and because
groundwater in this area is subject to an upward hydraulic gradient into Felicita Creek, future decreases in concentration in this area are anticipated to be reflected in nearby surface water sampling location FC-4 (Figure 7).
1.2.4.3 Felicita Creek Surface water in Felicita Creek derives from two major sources: 1) overland flow and tributary streams following rainfall events, and 2) groundwater flow into the channel where the channel is incised to the water table (Figure 6). Site-related VOCs are not present in overland flow of surface water, so Site-related VOC contributions to Felicita Creek are from groundwater flow into the creek channel. During parts of the year when overland flow contributes to the creek, any VOCs entering the channel via groundwater are mixed, reducing the detected concentrations of VOCs in surface water.
From just downstream of the Felicita Road culvert, groundwater containing dissolved VOCs is intercepted by the creek channel incised to below the water table (Figures 5 and 6). As water flows downstream from near surface water sampling location FC-11 to surface water sampling location FC-14, additional VOC-impacted water flows into the channel from shallow groundwater, with some flow from directly beneath the channel more representative of deep groundwater, while some proportion of VOCs volatilizes into the atmosphere. From surface water sampling location FC-14 to surface water sampling location FC-5, volatilization becomes a more dominant factor than groundwater flow into the creek, due in part to the boulders in the channel which force turbulent flow. From surface water sampling location FC-5 downstream to surface water sampling location FC-10, VOC-impacted groundwater flow into the channel dominates over volatilization, generally increasing concentrations.
As surface water flows
downstream of surface water sampling location FC-10, the factors contributing to volatilization
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
9
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
become relatively more dominant, and VOC concentrations decrease, ultimately to below detection limits as at surface water sampling locations FC-7 and FC-8A (Figure 5).
Aside from VOCs, however, Felicita Creek is impaired with respect to its designated beneficial uses due to naturally occurring, and therefore non-Site related, constituents (H+A, 1996 and 2015b). Non-Site related inorganic water quality constituents were consistently detected in surface water samples collected in 2013 through 2015 (Table 4), and some exceeded Basin Plan water quality objectives for one or more surface water samples collected. In addition, Felicita Creek has been designated as an “impaired” water body under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 2011). Felicita Creek is on the 303(d) list since Felicita Creek fails to meet Basin Plan water quality objectives, due to adverse impacts by non-Site related pollutants, TDS and aluminum (EPA, 2011).
1.3 SUMMARY OF RISK ASSESSMENTS – HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL RISK
Both the Group and DTSC have conducted risk analyses of Felicita Creek and concluded that Site-related contaminant levels within Felicita Creek are protective of human health and the environment (H+A, 2012; DTSC, 2014a and 2014c).
As part of the original Human Health Risk Assessment and Screening Ecological Evaluation Report (Environ, 1996), surface water risk-based trigger levels (SWRBTLs) were developed for the Site. The original SWRBTLs values were evaluated and updated to reflect changes in risk assessment methodology and exposure factors and the updated values were provided in the most recent 5-Year Remedy Review Report (H+A, 2012) and again in the Monitoring and Contingency Plan (MCP) prepared in September 2014 (H+A, 2014b). In February 2015, DTSC requested updated hypothetical SWRBTLs be calculated to facilitate risk communication to the public.
In response to DTSC comments, the Group prepared hypothetical SWRBTLs for
Low-Frequency, High-Contact and High-Frequency, Low-Contact scenarios, presented below for prevalent compounds (Chatham PRP Group, 2015).
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
10
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Minimum SWRBTL, Low-Frequency, High-Contact Scenario
Minimum SWRBTL, High-Frequency, Low-Contact Scenario
Highest Detection in Felicita Creek During Most Recent Sampling Event1 Constituent micrograms per liter micrograms per liter micrograms per liter TCE 370 89 8.5 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 220 35 5.4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis-1,2-DCE) 1,800 1,700 3.7 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) 640 160 1.8 1,1-Dichloroethylene (1,1-DCE) 43,000 39,000 1.2 1,4-Dioxane 910 370 36 Vinyl chloride 22 4.6 <0.50 1 Most recent sampling event was conducted in October 2015 for VOC constituents and April 2015 for 1,4-Dioxane.
For the two hypothetical exposure assumptions evaluated (i.e., a low-frequency, high-contact scenario, and a high frequency, low-contact scenario), the actual concentrations of VOCs detected in Felicita Creek (Table 3) remain substantially below the calculated hypothetical risk communication values, confirming that the remedy is providing ongoing protection of public health (Chatham PRP Group, 2015). The Group is currently working with DTSC to finalize the SWRBTLs.
Environmental Health Decisions (EHD) reviewed surface water data as part of an ecological screening assessment (Appendix B of H+A, 2012). Site-related constituents did not exceed federal or state ecological screening values established by EPA, RWQCB, and the U.S. Department of Energy. EHD concluded that “there are no ecological screening levels exceeded and no ecological impacts from surface water conditions in Felicita Creek are anticipated.” In addition, DTSC requested the Ecological Risk Assessment Section (ERAS) review the Final 5-Year Remedy Review Report and associated documents to evaluate potential impact on Felicita Creek. The review concluded “Based on the data provided, ERAS does not find significant risk from the detected VOCs to ecological receptors from surface waters of Felicita Creek.” (DTSC, 2014a).
1.4 EVALUATION GOALS
Traditionally, either passive or active mechanisms are utilized to remedy VOCs.
Passive
remediation entails monitoring and natural attenuation along with an ongoing monitoring program to ensure protection of human health and the environment is maintained.
Active
remediation includes components of passive remediation coupled with on-going active remedial 724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
11
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
technologies that reduce VOC concentrations in groundwater and/or surface water through enhanced volatilization, treatment and/or hydraulic containment.
The goal of this Feasibility Evaluation is to identify and evaluate potential remedial approaches that are protective of human health and the environment and may be able to “significantly reduce or stop the flow of Site-related contaminants” to Felicita Creek to the extent practical.
As described above, VOCs enter Felicita Creek as dissolved constituents of groundwater that enters the creek channel under the influence of the local hydraulic gradient.
Data trends
representing both groundwater and surface water indicate that passive remediation through monitoring and natural attenuation will be successful with time. Practically however, for active remediation, the range of potential alternatives is conceptually limited. The goal of reducing or stopping flow of Site-related contaminants to the creek could be addressed by active technologies that either:
treat VOCs in groundwater near the creek before the groundwater enters the creek channel;
stop or reduce the flow of groundwater containing VOCs to the creek channel, though this would likely result in dewatering a stretch of the creek; or
reduce VOC concentrations in creek surface water after groundwater enters the creek with active remediation that would accelerate the rate of reduction that already naturally occurs as the creek flows through FCP.
Each of these approaches presents its own challenges, as described in the following sections. It is likely that both passive and active remediation alternatives will operate for similar timeframes; therefore, the timeframe to complete is not evaluated in this Feasibility Evaluation.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
12
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2.0 REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR FELICITA CREEK
In order to address the DTSC comment to provide an evaluation to “address mechanisms which would significantly reduce or stop the flow of site related contaminants to the creek,” remedial technologies are presented in the following sections to address the presence of VOCs in Felicita Creek from approximately surface water sampling location FC-11 to FC-10. As described in the preceding section, groundwater containing VOCs is intercepted by the Felicita Creek channel incised to below the water table. Mechanisms to reduce or stop the flow of VOCs to the creek should remove VOCs from groundwater prior to interception by the creek channel, remove impacted groundwater before it enters the creek channel, or remove VOCs from the creek surface water after groundwater enters the creek channel.
2.1 IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING OF POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES
Potential remedial technologies demonstrated to be appropriate at sites with similar compounds of concern were identified as potentially applicable to the Site-specific conditions in the vicinity of Felicita Creek. Sources used to identify and evaluate the remedial technologies include literature review, vendor information, case studies, engineering judgment, and Site-specific data. Remedial technologies and a screening of remedial technologies were presented and discussed in a technical meeting with DTSC, RWQCB, and representatives of the Group on April 20, 2015. The screening results and technologies that were identified for further evaluation are discussed below. Based on the initial technical meeting, two additional technical meetings were held on August 19, 2015 with RWQCB, DTSC, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and representatives of the Group and on August 25, 2015 with RWQCB, County of San Diego, and representatives of the Group to discuss remedial technology implementability issues to assist in the development of the Feasibility Evaluation.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
13
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
The following approaches and technologies were identified to address VOCs in Felicita Creek:
No Action
Current MCP
Artesian Treatment Vessels
In Situ Groundwater Treatment (Prior to Flow Into Felicita Creek): o
Air Sparging in Shallow Groundwater beneath Felicita Creek
o
Injection of Reagents in Shallow Groundwater
o
Phytoremediation of VOCs Via Installation of Targeted Plant Species along Creek
o
Ex Situ Surface Water Treatment (Within Felicita Creek): o
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Installation of Enhanced Volatilization Structures
Hydraulic Containment (Pump and Treat with Liquid Phase Carbon [LGAC] Adsorption) with four Disposal options: o
Pump and Treat with Stream Disposal
o
Pump and Treat with Subsurface Disposal
o
Pump and Treat with Sanitary Sewer Disposal
o
Pump and Treat with Irrigation Reuse
2.2 POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES DESCRIPTIONS
No Action No action is generally required to be evaluated during remedial technology screening, but the Group performs groundwater and surface water monitoring in accordance with the MCP (H+A, 2014b) as specified by the DTSC-approved RAP and Consent Decree. Therefore, the no-action alternative will not be considered in this Feasibility Evaluation.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
14
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Monitoring in Accordance with the Current Monitoring and Contingency Plan Ongoing groundwater and surface water monitoring is being conducted in accordance with the current MCP.
Surface water in Felicita Creek is currently monitored semi-annually at
11 locations for VOCs; annually at 2 additional locations for VOCs, and 3 locations for 1,4-dioxane annually. In accordance with the MCP, any detection of VOCs in Felicita Creek exceeding SWRBTLs would trigger a contingency response. The MCP contingencies have been developed to ensure that human health and the environment remain protected at the Site. The MCP monitoring is currently being implemented at the Site, therefore this remedial alternative will be the baseline case for comparison of the remaining remedial alternatives instead of the no-action alternative.
Artesian Treatment Vessels This treatment technology relies on using differential head between the groundwater (subject to natural artesian conditions) and the creek to convey the groundwater through treatment vessels installed below ground level.
No energy inputs or mechanical moving parts are required.
Groundwater flows upward through the treatment vessels which contain LGAC.
Treated
groundwater flows through a gravel diffusion bed near the creek.
In Situ Groundwater Treatment This category of treatment technology consists of treatment of VOCs in groundwater prior to flow into Felicita Creek. Treatments considered include: 1) bubbling air through the saturated zone to enhance volatilization of VOCs to the unsaturated zone and potentially enhance aerobic degradation of VOCs; 2) injection of chemical reagents and/or amendments to promote VOC degradation reactions; 3) installation of targeted plant species adjacent to the creek to promote phytoremediation of VOCs in groundwater; or 4) installation of a permeable reactive barrier to chemically degrade VOCs as groundwater flows through the barrier before entering the creek.
Ex Situ Surface Water Treatment This category of treatment technologies consists of treatment of creek water within the Felicita Creek channel.
Treatment may be accomplished through:
1) installation of bubbler
mechanisms to volatize VOCs in surface water; or 2) installation of structures that intercept the
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
15
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
surface water flow in the creek such as weirs, cascades, boulder clusters, or rip rap to enhance volatilization of VOCs by increasing the air/water contact.
Hydraulic Containment – Pump and Treat Pump and treat refers to one of the most well established and widely used remediation technologies. Implementation would involve installing vertical groundwater extraction wells in the shallow and/or deep zones with submersible pumps to intercept groundwater flows into Felicita Creek. Groundwater would be pumped and conveyed in above- and/or below-grade pipelines to a LGAC adsorption treatment system. Following treatment, treated groundwater would be conveyed to one of four disposal options: directly to Felicita Creek, through infiltration trenches/galleries to recharge groundwater, to irrigation reuse, or to the sanitary sewer.
2.3 SCREENING CRITERIA
Each potential remedial technology identified in Section 2.2 was screened based on Site-specific effectiveness and implementability.
The effectiveness of each remedial technology was addressed based on the ability to reliably reduce the flow of VOCs into Felicita Creek while minimizing changes to surface water flow in Felicita Creek.
The implementability evaluation addressed the technical and administrative feasibility of implementing each remedial technology at the Site considering Site conditions and administrative requirements.
A summary of the effectiveness and implementability screening of potential remedial technologies is presented in Table 5. Certain technologies were screened out at this level, and the rational is presented in Table 5. Retained technologies are discussed further below.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
16
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
2.4 RETAINED REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES
Remedial technologies were screened (Table 5) and the retained technologies for consideration are the current MCP, ex situ treatment within Felicita Creek by installation of structures, and hydraulic containment. The results of this screening were presented and discussed at the initial technical meeting with DTSC and the RWQCB in April 2015.
The retained remedial
technologies are assembled into the following remedial alternatives:
FC1: Current MCP
FC2: Ex situ surface water treatment within Felicita Creek via installation of structures
FC3A: Hydraulic containment (pump and treat with LGAC) with treated groundwater to Felicita Creek
FC3B: Hydraulic containment with treated groundwater returned to subsurface
FC3C: Hydraulic containment with non-potable reuse
Analysis of these remedial alternatives is provided in Section 3.0.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
17
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.0 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The analysis of assembled remedial alternatives for Felicita Creek is presented in this section which includes the criteria used to evaluate the respective alternatives.
3.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Remedial alternatives were developed for Felicita Creek based on the remedial technologies retained from the previous section. Each remedial alternative was evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria:
Protection of Human Health and Environment,
Effectiveness,
Implementability,
Cost, and
Preservation of Water Resource.
A description of each evaluation criterion is provided in the following sections.
3.1.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Each remedial alternative was evaluated as to its overall protection of human health and the environment.
The remedial alternatives were assessed to determine the degree to which
potential human exposure is minimized or eliminated and the degree to which the Felicita Creek resource and surrounding area is protected.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
18
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.1.2 Effectiveness Short-term effectiveness considers the effect of each remedial alternative on the protection of human health and the environment during the construction and implementation phase. Long-term effectiveness considers the likelihood that each remedial alternative will reduce VOC mass flux to Felicita Creek or the VOC concentrations in Felicita Creek.
3.1.3 Implementability The implementability evaluation addressed the technical and administrative feasibility of each remedial alternative. Technical feasibility was evaluated based on the ability to implement the remedial alternative given the existing Site-specific conditions. Administrative feasibility was evaluated based on the ability to obtain permits, gain State and community acceptance, and receive any off-property access required for the remedial alternative.
3.1.4 Cost Each remedial alternative was evaluated as to its relative expected cost (high, medium or low) compared to the other remedial alternatives.
Both capital and operation and maintenance
(O&M) costs were considered.
3.1.5 Water Resource Preservation Each remedial alternative was assessed to determine the degree to which the Felicita Creek water resource is preserved and changes in surface water flow caused by the respective remedial alternative is minimized.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
19
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
Each of the retained remedial alternatives for Felicita Creek are described below and evaluated based on the five evaluation criteria.
A summary of the pros and cons of each remedial
alternative is provided in Tables 6 and 7.
3.2.1 Alternative FC1: Current Monitoring and Contingency Plan (Baseline) The current MCP Alternative FC1 relies on the continued implementation of the provisions of the MCP (H+A, 2014b) to monitor the progress of cleanup in the creek. Current conditions indicate that reduction of VOCs will occur over time due to implementation of the GRS at the Site and natural attenuation processes in shallow groundwater.
The MCP outlines the groundwater and surface water monitoring that is conducted at the Site. Monitoring of shallow and deep groundwater in FCP and surface water in Felicita Creek is conducted on a semi-annual and annual basis. Surface water in Felicita Creek is monitored at 13 locations (Figure 5); shallow groundwater in FCP is monitored at 3 shallow monitor wells and 2 shallow regional wells (Figure 3); and deep groundwater in FCP is monitored at 3 deep monitor wells (Figure 4).
Triggers and contingencies have been identified in the MCP for potential receptors and hypothetical exposures to VOC-impacted groundwater and surface water. These contingencies have been developed to ensure that human health and the environment remain protected at the Site. The MCP also describes actions to be taken in the event that data collected or information developed during monitoring indicates the existence of a potential threat to human health or the environment. This MCP may also be updated in the event that data collected or information developed during monitoring indicates a potential threat to human health or the environment that may exist at the Site. Any detection of VOCs in surface water exceeding SWRBTLs will trigger a contingency response.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
20
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.1.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Alternative FC1 is protective of human health and the environment by maintaining regular monitoring of groundwater and surface water concentrations within FCP. The results of this monitoring are compared to SWRBTLs and, currently, all VOCs are significantly below relevant SWRBTLs.
SWRBTLs have been derived and updated (Section 1.3) to ensure ongoing
protection of human health during water-contact activities at the creek. The current MCP would protect human health and the environment in the event of an exceedance, since an exceedance will trigger a contingency response. Given the highly conservative assumptions used to derive the SWRBTLs, the detection of a Site-related chemical in creek water at a concentration above its SWRBTL does not indicate that risks to recreational users at the creek exceed risk levels established by regulatory agencies.
There are no visual, construction, and/or operating impacts to Felicita Creek or FCP as a result of implementation of Alternative FC1.
3.2.1.2 Effectiveness Alternative FC1 is effective for monitoring the progress of VOC concentration reduction by natural attenuation processes in Felicita Creek. Surface water analytical results are compared to SWRBTLs and, in the event that SWRBTLs are exceeded, contingency responses are triggered.
Alternative FC1 does not actively accelerate the reduction of VOC mass flux or VOC concentrations in Felicita Creek, but future decreases of both VOC mass flux and VOC concentrations are anticipated in Felicita Creek as a result of natural attenuation of VOCs in shallow groundwater. Also, although concentrations of VOCs exceeding MCLs are observed in Felicita Creek in the northern portion of FCP (between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10), volatilization of VOCs is likely occurring downstream of surface water sampling location FC-10, as evidenced by the low detections or no detection of VOCs at surface water sampling location FC-7. VOC volatilization in shallow surface streams is commonly observed due to the high Henry’s Law constants and the exposure of the surface to ambient air conditions (Chapman et al., 2007).
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
21
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
There are no adverse long-term environmental impacts related to implementation of Alternative FC1.
3.2.1.3 Implementability Alternative FC1 is an established, successful procedure for monitoring VOCs in Felicita Creek and is highly implementable based on the ease of installation, availability of experienced contractors, reliability of technology, and simplicity of performance monitoring. Groundwater monitoring has been conducted in existing FCP monitor wells and regional wells for 9 to 20 years, and surface water monitoring has been conducted in Felicita Creek for approximately 20 years.
Groundwater and surface water sampling methods are based on conventional,
proven techniques. In addition, there would be no disruption to patrons other than semiannual collection of groundwater and surface water samples by a two person field crew.
Sample
collection at all groundwater wells and surface water locations would be completed in no more than 2 days per sampling event.
Administratively, Alternative FC1 has proven implementability with respect to agency coordination and access to monitoring locations within FCP.
3.2.1.4 Cost Alternative FC1 represents the baseline for remedial alternatives in Felicity Creek since these MCP activities are ongoing and required by DTSC. Therefore, there is no additional cost to implement this alternative because no activities are proposed beyond those currently conducted.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
22
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.1.5 Water Resource Preservation Alternative FC1 preserves the water resource.
3.2.2 Alternative FC2: Ex Situ Treatment – Enhanced Volatilization Ex situ surface water treatment would consist of treatment of creek water within Felicita Creek, between sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10. Treatment would potentially be accomplished through installation of structures along approximately 1,400 lineal feet of Felicita Creek that would intercept the surface water flow and would enhance the natural volatilization of VOCs that is already occurring throughout the length of the creek. The structures, such as aeration weirs or boulders and rip rap may induce turbulent flow to increase gas transfer by air/water contact, thereby increasing the dissolved oxygen in the water and removing dissolved VOCs.
Studies have shown that the ratio between the aeration coefficient for oxygen and the volatilization coefficient for VOCs is constant for a given environmental condition (Pant et al., 2007), indicating that aeration processes may be potentially effective VOC stripping processes. The effectiveness of VOC removal would depend upon factors including the efficiency of the physical design of the structures to achieve air to water contact as well as environmental conditions such as water velocity, water depth, water and air temperatures, wind speed, and water quality.
In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, installation of any
structure within the Felicita Creek channel will require authorization from the USACE.
Aeration Weirs/Cascades:
Aeration (oxygen addition) is routinely the first step during the
production of drinking water from groundwater or riverbank water, and one of the oldest hydraulic structures employed is the aeration weir or series of weirs, known as cascades (Toombes, L. and H. Chanson, 2000) (Figure 10A). Weir structures accomplish aeration and gas stripping (VOC removal) through a stepped drop in elevation, where the water falls over a weir into the water body at a lower elevation. When the falling water stream submerges in the receiving water body, air is entrained and dispersed in the form of bubbles, providing an improved interface between air and water. Gas transfer occurs at the interface between the water and the air bubbles and the residence time of entrained bubbles in the water body correlates with the stripping efficiency. Because the amount of air that is entrained is limited,
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
23
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
the capacity for gas transfer of VOCs through weirs and cascades is limited.
Weirs or
cascades, therefore, are commonly used in water treatment for the removal of methane and the addition of oxygen, and not typically used for the removal of VOCs when high removal efficiencies are required (Van Dijk, J.C., 2007). The expected TCE removal efficiency in a cascade system is less than 50 percent. The air water interface ratio may possibly be improved by adding baffles to produce additional turbulence.
Installation of weirs would involve construction of multiple barriers across the creek, designed to accumulate (pool) water behind the weir until the water level rises to the height of the weir and flows steadily over the top (Figure 10B). Key components to the aeration and VOC stripping efficiency of the weir is the drop (fall) height of each weir, receiving water depth, weir discharge rate, and the number of weir steps forming the cascade system, although the efficiency of the system is limited, as described previously. An efficient VOC-removal weir drop height in the northern 1,400 feet of the east fork of Felicita Creek between FC-11 and FC-10 would be difficult to achieve due to the minimal elevation relief. The northern-most 400-foot section of the east fork between FC-11 and FC-12 has an approximately 5-foot elevation decline, the next 500-foot section between FC-12 and south of FC-15 has an approximately 15-foot elevation decline, and the next 500-foot section between FC-15 and Clarence Lane has an approximately 5-foot elevation decline.
Detailed engineering evaluation and field testing in the creek would be required to design each weir structure, but given the minimal elevation relief over long distances, it can be assumed that many
short-drop
weir
structures
would
be
required
with
significant
distances
of
pooled/accumulated water behind (upgradient) of each structure. A series of cascade-type check dams, installed during the Work Projects Administration in the 1930’s, are currently located in Felicita Creek in the vicinity of surface water sampling location FC-7, where the creek gradient is much steeper.
Boulders and/or Rip Rap: In-stream structures such as rip/rap, boulder clusters, and riffles have typically been used to enhance stream habitat for the benefit of fish and other aquatic organisms (Fischenich, C. and R. Seal, 2000; Washington Department of Forestry, 2004). In order to be effective, water velocities must be sufficient so that these structures create flow separation and lead to the formation of eddies or vortices in their wake.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
24
In addition to
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
enhancing stream habitat, these flow characteristics may be also useful to enhance volatilization of VOCs. Aeration may be increased by strategic placement of rip rap and/or large (greater than 1 cubic yard) immobile boulders within the creek bed to create velocity gradients and turbulence as the water travels along a more tortuous path around and over these features (Figure 10A). Boulder placement creates a diversity of water depths and velocities which would provide air bubbles and turbulence as the boulders induce water velocity gradients, where slow water velocities occur in close proximity to faster velocities.
This induced turbulence may
increase the air water contact to enhance volatilization.
Installation of boulder clusters or rip-rap in the northern-most portion of the east fork of Felicita Creek between FC-11 and FC-12 is unlikely to induce the flow characteristics necessary to enhance volatilization. This portion of the creek has minimal elevation relief and water velocity is slow and visually imperceptible. Boulder installation would be focused on the 1,100-foot portion of Felicita Creek between FC-12 and FC-10.
There are currently large boulders located in Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-14 and FC-5, which create turbulent flow.
3.2.2.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Although implementation of the current MCP is protective of human health and the environment, Alternative FC2 is marginally more protective. Enhanced volatilization would protect human health and the environment by accelerating the rate of volatilization to reduce VOC concentrations in a shorter distance than is currently occurring.
The potential for human
exposure may be marginally reduced and the VOC concentrations within Felicita Creek may be reduced. Alternative FC2 provides protection of the environment by preserving the flow of water in Felicita Creek.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
25
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.2.2 Effectiveness Installation of enhanced volatilization structures (aeration weirs/cascades or rip rap) in Felicita Creek is anticipated to be marginally effective at accelerating the rate of volatilization to reduce VOC concentrations in Felicita Creek more rapidly and within a shorter distance than is currently occurring due to natural attenuation. The effectiveness will be variable, depending on creek flowrate. The total mass of VOCs transferred to the air due to the enhanced volatilization would dissipate immediately and not pose a risk to human health.
The enhanced volatilization
structures may require periodic maintenance to remove accumulated natural debris that would reduce their effectiveness.
3.2.2.3 Implementability Construction of the enhanced volatilization structures throughout a 1,100- to 1,400-foot section of the northern portion of Felicita Creek would result in a short-term significant disruption to Felicita Creek and FCP. These impacts would include temporary restriction of access to the northern portion of Felicita Creek and FCP and noise associated with construction.
Construction of weirs would require diversion of the creek or the use of temporary cofferdams to allow the enclosed creek area to be pumped out and create a dry work environment. Sheet piles associated with the cofferdams may be left in place to avoid damage to the newly constructed weir.
The weir structures would be installed across the creek channel and
embedded in the creek banks in multiple locations with footings for the weirs extending below the creek bed at sufficient depth to stabilize the structures.
Installation of boulder clusters would require careful placement of rock. Typically, a hydraulic excavator with a bucket and thumb attachment that can easily move the boulders is used.
For both weir installation and boulder cluster placement, the number and location of access points should be carefully selected to minimize trampling and damage to bank slopes and riparian vegetation as the heavy equipment moves up and down the creek channel. At project completion, disturbed areas will need to be graded smooth, seeded, and planted to repair damage and restore the riparian zone.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
26
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Technical implementability of Alternative FC2 is moderately difficult, requiring an iterative approach. Performance testing and possible modification would be required for each structure installed throughout the 1,100- to 1,400-foot length of Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10 due to the unique creek conditions at each location.
Long-term impacts associated with Alternative FC2 include altering the existing nature of flow within Felicita Creek and disturbance of the stream bed, although similar structures are currently present in Felicita Creek. Construction of cascades or boulders and rip rap can be designed to use materials that visually blend with the natural environment of Felicita Creek and have the appearance of natural features. At project completion, all structures could be removed.
Alternative FC2 would be difficult to implement, based on permitting requirements.
As
discussed with RWQCB and USACE during technical meetings on August 16, 2015, this project would require extensive permits. FCP is a California State Historic Site, and both access and approval to implement Alternative FC2 would require negotiation with the County of San Diego Parks Department. There are multi-jurisdictional permitting requirements including:
Obtain USACE approval for installation of any structure within Felicita Creek, in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;
Obtain determination from RWQCB in accordance with Section 403 of the Clean Water Act;
Consult with California Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding design of VOC mitigation for necessary permits;
Perform Biological Surveys to support environmental permits;
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) evaluation and determination by DTSC; and
Conduct public notification and community relations.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
27
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.2.4 Cost The Alternative FC2 costs would be high. Costs would include a complex approval process to negotiate access in FCP, multi-jurisdictional permitting, CEQA review, and biological surveys; capital costs for the significant construction effort; and O&M costs for periodic inspection and debris removal.
3.2.2.5 Water Resource Preservation Alternative FC2 does not alter the volume of flow in Felicita Creek, but does promote turbulent flow characteristics. Therefore, Alternative FC2 preserves the water resource.
3.2.3 Alternative FC3A: Hydraulic Containment with Treated Water to Surface Water Hydraulic containment of groundwater that flows to Felicita Creek would be accomplished using pump and treat technology. A conceptual design for evaluation purposes was developed and has been evaluated. Any design would need to be reviewed and approved by the San Diego County Parks Department. Implementation may include installation of three to five or more groundwater extraction wells located along the axis of the northern portion of Felicita Creek between sampling locations FC-11/11A and FC-10, to intercept shallow groundwater flow to Felicita Creek. Groundwater would be pumped by submersible pumps installed in each extraction well and conveyed through approximately 1,400 feet of above- and/or below-grade, double-contained pipelines to a LGAC adsorption treatment system. Conveyance piping will be installed adjacent to Felicita Creek. Based on professional judgment, simple capture analysis, and hydraulic information from groundwater monitoring, it is assumed that the total flowrate to the LGAC adsorption treatment system would be approximately 20 to 40 gallons per minute. The LGAC adsorption treatment system would consist of two 2,000-pound carbon adsorbers, a 2,000-gallon utility tank, a transfer pump, and a control system and would be located on a 20-foot by 20-foot concrete pad with spill containment dike, surrounded by fencing. If access approval can be obtained from FCP, the treatment system could be installed adjacent to the old county firehouse building at FCP (Figures 11A and 11B).
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
28
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Conveying treated water to Felicita Creek would require construction of a structure in the northern portion of FCP and approximately 300 feet of above- and/or below-grade treated water pipeline from the effluent of the LGAC adsorption treatment system at the old county firehouse to Felicita Creek.
Felicita Creek is located within the Felicita HSA, which is designated for beneficial use as municipal and domestic supply. Returning treated groundwater to Felicita Creek would require obtaining a NPDES permit under the General Waste Discharge Requirements for Groundwater Extraction Discharges to Surface Waters within the San Diego Region, San Diego RWQCB Order No. R9-2015-0013/NPDES No. CAG919003. Consultation with the RWQCB indicates treatment of TDS, chloride, nitrate, total nitrogen, sulfate, manganese, and iron which occur in regional groundwater would be required. Treatment for these constituents is not feasible due to the generation of a brine stream that must be disposed of via sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer capacity is not currently available in the vicinity of FCP. Surface monitoring and reporting would be required as stipulated by the NPDES permit.
3.2.3.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Although implementation of the current MCP is protective of human health and the environment, Alternative FC3A is marginally more protective by reducing the mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek. The potential for human exposure would be reduced and the VOC concentrations within Felicita Creek would be reduced.
Alternative FC3A provides protection of the environment by preserving the flow of water in Felicita Creek by conveying treated water to the creek, but installation and construction activities will cause significant disruption to the northern portion of FCP adjacent to a sensitive creek.
3.2.3.2 Effectiveness Hydraulic containment is potentially effective for capturing shallow and deep groundwater in the targeted area and LGAC is a proven effective technology for reducing VOC concentrations in extracted water. LGAC would not reduce other constituents in groundwater including TDS,
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
29
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
chloride, sulfate and other non-VOCs that may require treatment to comply with discharge requirements for the NPDES permit. The extraction system can be designed and implemented to minimize mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10. Treated water returned to the creek would mix with VOCs flowing into the creek outside of the extraction capture zone, but may not achieve MCLs throughout the creek in the short-term.
3.2.3.3 Implementability During the construction of Alternative FC3A, there would be a short-term significant disruption to Felicita Creek and FCP.
These impacts would include noise and traffic associated with
construction and temporary restriction of access to the northern portion of FCP from Felicita Creek to the old county firehouse. Construction activities would include drilling and installation of the shallow and deep extraction wells and associated wellhead equipment; installation of the treatment system; trenching for installation of electrical conduit, conveyance pipelines, and treated water pipelines; and construction of a water return structure. Construction equipment and activities would potentially impact the sensitive creek and park environment and restoration activities may be required. During the operational phase, there will be a loss of use of the treatment system area to FCP and park patrons, although there is minimal potential human exposure to VOCs from operation of the treatment system. Construction in and below the ordinary high water mark in the vicinity of Felicita Creek will trigger the need for Section 404 and 403 permits issued by USACE and RWQCB, respectively. O&M of the treatment system and disposal structure will necessitate regular visits by the treatment system operator and/or other contractors.
Technical implementability of Alternative FC3A is moderate.
Design and installation of
groundwater extraction wells for hydraulic containment and LGAC treatment systems are standard practice. Extraction well locations could be sited to minimize impacts to existing FCP features.
Experienced drillers and contractors are available.
O&M of the treatment and
disposal systems are standard practice and experienced operators are available.
Alternative FC3A would be difficult to implement, based on administrative challenges. FCP is a California State Historic Site, and both access and approval to implement Alternative FC3A
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
30
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
would require negotiation with the County of San Diego Parks Department. There are multi-jurisdictional permitting requirements including:
Obtain USACE approval for installation of any structure within the Felicita Creek or below the ordinary high water mark, in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;
Obtain determination from RWQCB in accordance with Section 403 of the Clean Water Act;
Consult with California Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding design of VOC mitigation for necessary permits;
Perform Biological Surveys to support environmental permits;
CEQA evaluation and determination by DTSC;
Obtain NPDES permit; and
Conduct public notification and community relations.
Returning treated water to Felicita Creek would not be feasible due to treatment requirements for inorganic constituents including TDS, chloride, nitrate, and sulfate.
Treatment of these
constituents generates a brine stream that must be disposed of via sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer capacity is not currently available in the vicinity of FCP.
3.2.3.4 Cost Alternative FC3A costs would be high. Costs would include a complex approval process to negotiate access, multi-jurisdictional permitting, CEQA review, and biological surveys; capital costs for the significant construction effort; O&M costs including monitoring in accordance with the NPDES permit.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
31
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.3.5 Water Resource Preservation Alternative FC3A returns the treated water to the creek and preserves the water resource.
3.2.4 Alternative FC3B: Hydraulic Containment with Treated Water to Subsurface Hydraulic containment of groundwater that flows to Felicita Creek would be accomplished using pump and treat technology, as described in Alternative FC3A (Section 3.2.3). The remedial alternative would be designed to be outside the delineated area of Felicita Creek to eliminate the need for Section 404 and 403 permits issued by USACE and RWQCB, respectively.
Returning treated groundwater to the subsurface would require construction of one or more infiltration trenches to recharge groundwater. The infiltration trench(es) could be located near surface water sampling location FC-11. Typical infiltration trenches consist of a 3-foot to 6-foot deep trench, lined with filter fabric and backfilled with aggregate (EPA, 1999). Generally, a sand layer is provided at the base of the trench, aggregate is used to fill the trench to approximately 2 inches below grade and a 2-inch thick pea gravel layer overlies the top.
Treated water
conveyed to the infiltration trench passes downward through the void space between the stones and infiltrates through the trench bottom and into the soil matrix, and recharges groundwater.
Infiltration trenches must have routine inspection and maintenance. The principal maintenance objective is to prevent clogging, which may lead to reduced infiltration capacity. An observation well is recommended to monitor water levels in the trench, generally a 4- to 6-inch diameter pipe which is anchored vertically to a foot plate at the bottom of the trench. Inadequate drainage may indicate the need for maintenance.
Felicita Creek is located within the Felicita HSA, which is designated for beneficial use as municipal and domestic supply. Infiltration of treated groundwater would require obtaining a permit under the General Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Treated Groundwater from Volatile Organic Compound Cleanup Sites to Land in the San Diego Region (WDR), San Diego RWQCB Order No. R9-2008-0138. Infiltration groundwater would require RWQCB to adopt permit limits for TDS, chloride, nitrate, total nitrogen, and sulfate consistent
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
32
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
with regional groundwater quality. Monitoring and reporting would be required as stipulated by the WDR permit.
3.2.4.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Although implementation of the current MCP is protective of human health and the environment, Alternative FC3B is marginally more protective by reducing the mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek. The potential for human exposure would be reduced and the VOC concentrations within Felicita Creek would be reduced.
Alternative FC3B may result in the loss of flow to the creek if the infiltrated water promotes growth of plants that increase evapotranspiration and installation and construction activities will cause significant disruption to the northern portion of FCP adjacent to a sensitive creek.
3.2.4.2 Effectiveness Hydraulic containment is potentially effective for capturing shallow and deep groundwater in the targeted area and LGAC is a proven effective technology for reducing VOC concentrations in extracted water. The extraction system can be designed and implemented to minimize mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10. There is the potential for loss of flow in the creek if infiltrated water does not flow into the creek. A portion of the infiltrated groundwater may also be recaptured by the extraction wells reducing the overall effectiveness of this alternative. Alternative FC3B may not achieve MCLs throughout the creek in the short-term.
3.2.4.3 Implementability During the construction of Alternative FC3B, there would be a short-term significant disruption to Felicita Creek and FCP.
These impacts would include noise and traffic associated with
construction and temporary restriction of access to the northern portion of FCP from Felicita Creek to the old county firehouse. Construction activities would include drilling and installation of the shallow and deep extraction wells and associated wellhead equipment; installation of the
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
33
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
treatment system; trenching for installation of electrical conduit, conveyance pipelines, and treated water pipelines; and construction of the infiltration trench(es). During the operational phase, there will be a loss of use of the treatment system area and infiltration trench area to FCP and park patrons, although there is minimal potential human exposure to VOCs from operation of the treatment system. O&M of the treatment system and infiltration trench(es) will necessitate regular visits by the treatment system operator and/or other contractors. Periodically, the infiltration trenches will require rehabilitation and or replacement to restore loss of capacity due to fouling.
Technical implementability of Alternative FC3B is moderate.
Design and installation of
groundwater extraction wells for hydraulic containment and LGAC treatment systems are standard practice. Experienced drillers and contractors are available. O&M of the treatment and disposal systems are standard practice and experienced operators are available.
Alternative FC3B would be difficult to implement, based on administrative challenges. FCP is a California State Historic Site, and both access and approval to implement Alternative FC3B would require negotiation with the County of San Diego Parks Department. The San Diego County Parks Department in the August 25, 2015 technical meeting indicated a strong preference for alternatives that do not have extensive underground infrastructure and require new facilities. There are multi-jurisdictional permitting requirements including:
Consult with California Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding design of VOC mitigation for necessary permits;
Perform Biological Surveys to support environmental permits;
Determine CEQA requirements for CEQA evaluation, if required; and
Conduct public notification and community relations.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
34
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.4.4 Cost Alternative FC3B costs would be high. Costs would include a complex approval process to negotiate access, multi-jurisdictional permitting, CEQA review, and biological surveys; capital costs for the significant construction effort; O&M costs including monitoring in accordance with the WDR permit. Maintenance of the infiltration trench(es) would be costly due to fouling.
3.2.4.5 Water Resource Preservation Alternative FC3B would be designed for maximum return of the treated water to the creek, but there is potential loss of flow in the creek if a portion of infiltrated water is lost to increase plant growth in the vicinity of the infiltration trench(es).
3.2.5 Alternative FC3C: Hydraulic Containment with Non-Potable Reuse Hydraulic containment of groundwater that flows to Felicita Creek would be accomplished using pump and treat technology, as described in Section 3.2.3.
Irrigation reuse at FCP would require installation of a water storage tank and associated pumps, pipelines, and controls to connect the effluent of the treatment system to the FCP irrigation distribution system.
3.2.5.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment Although implementation of the current MCP is protective of human health and the environment, Alternative FC3C is marginally more protective of human health by reducing of the mass flux of VOCs- into Felicita Creek, but would not protect the environment due to the loss of water flow in the creek due to losses associated with evapotranspiration in the irrigated area. Given the seasonally variable demand for irrigation water, there would likely be periods of time when the system could not be operated, allowing for continued flow into the creek.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
35
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
3.2.5.2 Effectiveness Hydraulic containment is potentially effective for capturing shallow and deep groundwater in the targeted area and LGAC is a proven effective technology for reducing VOC concentrations in extracted water. The extraction system can be designed and implemented to minimize mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10. Treated water would not be returned to the creek system, but would be used for irrigation within FCP. Alternative FC3C may not achieve MCLs throughout the creek in the short-term.
During the operational phase, there will be a loss of use of the treatment system area to FCP and park patrons, although there is minimal potential human exposure to VOCs from operation of the treatment system. O&M of the treatment system will necessitate regular visits by the treatment system operator and/or other contractors.
3.2.5.3 Implementability During the construction of Alternative FC3C, there would be a short-term significant disruption to Felicita Creek and FCP.
These impacts would include noise and traffic associated with
construction and temporary restriction of access to the northern portion of FCP from Felicita Creek to the old county firehouse. Construction activities would include drilling and installation of the shallow and deep extraction wells and associated wellhead equipment; installation of the treatment system; trenching for installation of electrical conduit, conveyance pipelines, and treated water pipelines; and construction of the FCP irrigation tie-in.
Technical implementability of Alternative FC3C is moderate.
Design and installation of
groundwater extraction wells for hydraulic containment and LGAC treatment systems are standard practice. Experienced drillers and contractors are available. O&M of the treatment and disposal systems are standard practice and experienced operators are available.
Alternative FC3C would be difficult to implement, based on administrative challenges. FCP is a California State Historic Site, and both access and approval to implement Alternative FC3C would require negotiation with the County of San Diego Parks Department. The San Diego County Parks Department in the August 25, 2015 technical meeting indicated that there is no
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
36
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
need for additional irrigation water at FCP. It is unlikely that another irrigation water user could be identified in the vicinity of FCP.
There are multi-jurisdictional permitting requirements
including:
Obtain WDR permit with waiver of permit limits for TDS, chloride, sulfate, nitrate, total nitrogen;
Consult with California Department of Fish and Wildlife regarding design of VOC mitigation for necessary permits;
Perform Biological Surveys to support environmental permits;
Determine CEQA requirements for CEQA evaluation, if required; and
Conduct public notification and community relations.
3.2.5.4 Cost Alternative FC3C costs would be high. Costs would include a complex approval process to negotiate access, multi-jurisdictional permitting, CEQA review, and biological surveys; capital costs for the significant construction effort; O&M costs including monitoring in accordance with the NPDES permit.
3.2.5.5 Water Resource Preservation Alternative FC3C does not return the treated water to the creek and therefore, does not preserve the water resource.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
37
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
4.0 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES
The Felicita Creek alternatives include passive and active remedial mechanisms to reduce VOCs:
monitoring and natural attenuation (Alternative FC1); construction of structures in
Felicita Creek to enhance volatilization (Alternative FC2); and hydraulic containment and treatment of extracted groundwater (Alternatives FC3A, FC3B, and FC3C). Three treated water options were considered for the hydraulic containment option: Felicita Creek (FC3A), infiltration trench (FC3B), and irrigation reuse (FC3C).
Protection of Human Health and Environment
Current concentrations detected in Felicita Creek have not exceeded any of the SWRBTLs and risk analyses for Felicita Creek concluded that Site-related contaminants within Felicita Creek are protective of human health and the environment (H+A, 2012; DTSC, 2014a and 2014c). Alternatives FC1, FC2, and FC3 (A to C) provide protection of human health through continued surface water monitoring in Felicita Creek and comparison of analytical results to SWRBTLs. Current conditions indicate that VOC reductions will occur over time through natural attenuation processes. Alternatives FC2 and FC3 (A to C) are marginally more protective of human health than FC1 by marginally reducing the potential for human exposure to VOCs: FC2 is anticipated to limit VOC exposure to a shorter distance within Felicita Creek and FC3 (A to C) is expected to reduce the mass flux of VOCs into Felicita Creek. Alternatives FC1, FC2, and FC3A provide protection of the environment by preserving the flow of water in Felicita Creek, with Alternative FC3B performing similarly and Alternative FC3C performing less favorably due to water losses due evapotranspiration in the irrigated area(s).
Effectiveness
Alternative FC1, FC2, and FC3 are expected to reduce VOCs in Felicita Creek.
The
mechanism for VOC reduction in Alternative FC1 is natural attenuation, for Alternative FC2 is enhanced volatilization of creek water, and for Alternative FC3 is hydraulic containment and treatment of extracted groundwater with LGAC. Alternative FC2 is anticipated to provide VOC reduction in Felicita Creek more quickly and within a shorter distance than Alternative FC1.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
38
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Alternatives FC3A, FC3B, and FC3C are expected to intercept groundwater containing VOCs prior to flow into Felicita Creek, and reduce the mass flux of VOCs to Felicita Creek. Alternative FC3A will return the treated water directly to the creek and mix with VOC-impacted water flowing in the creek.
Alternative FC3B will recharge groundwater and mix with
VOC-impacted water flowing in the creek, although the mixing effect will be lower than Alternative FC3A. Alternative FC3C will reduce the mass flux of VOCs to Felicita Creek, but would be subject to seasonal water demand and result in reduced operation of the system during the wet season.
Implementability
Alternative FC1 is the most implementable alternative. Alternatives FC2 and FC3B are difficult to
implement
due
to
the
approval/permits
and
access
requirements,
respectively.
Alternatives FC3A and FC3C cannot be practically implemented due to the natural inorganic water quality/permit requirements and lack of need for irrigation water by FCP, respectively.
Cost
Alternative FC1 has a low associated cost. Alternatives FC2, FC3A, FC3B, and FC3C have high costs.
Water Resource Preservation
Alternative FC1 preserves the flow in Felicita Creek with no adverse impacts to the creek. Alternative FC2 preserves flow in the creek with limited adverse impact due to installation of structures in the creek. Alternative FC3A preserves the flow in Felicita Creek, Alternative FC3B may reduce the flow in Felicita Creek if a portion of infiltrated water does is lost before flowing into the creek, and Alternative FC3C has the greatest potential to decrease the flow in Felicita Creek between surface sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
39
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
Preferred Alternative
FC-1 is the preferred alternative. It is protective of human health and the environment, it is implementable while the other alternatives may not be due to permitting limitation. FC-1 is least disruptive and preserves the water resource.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
40
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
5.0 REFERENCES
California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), 1998. Remedial Action Plan, Chatham Brothers Barrel Yard, Escondido, California. January 1998. _____, 2014a. Memorandum from J. Eichelberger to H. Nassiri, DTSC, re: Final 5 Year Remedy Review Report, July 2004 – March 2010, Chatham Site. August 22, 2014. _____, 2014b. Letter from H. Nassiri to E. Modiano, Chatham Site PRP Group, re: Response to Annual Monitoring Submittal and Conceptual Site Model Update, Chattham [sic] Brothers Barrel Yard, Escondido, California, Site Code 400029-00, MPC 332. September 24, 2014. _____, 2014c. Memorandum from E. Neuwirth to H. Nassiri, DTSC, and re: Health risks related to VOC contaminants in Felicita Creek, Chatham Brother Barrel Yards Site, Escondido, California. October 22, 2014. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, 2012. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9). September 8, 1994; updated and uploaded to RWQCB website August 28, 2012. Chapman, S.W., B. Parker, J. Cherry, R. Aravena, D. Hunkeler, 2007. “Groundwater-surface water interaction and its role on TCE groundwater plume attenuation”, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 91, issues 3-4, 203-232, 2007. Chatham Site PRP Group, 2015. Letter from E. Modiano to H. Nassiri, DTSC, re: Response to DTSC Comments Dated February 19, 2015 on the Monitoring and Contingency Plan, Chatham Site, Escondido, California Revision 2.2. April 30, 2015. Environ Corporation, 1996. Human Health Risk Assessment and Screening Ecological Evaluation Report, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. May 1996. Fischenich, C. and R. Seal, 1999. “Boulder Clusters,” EMRRP Technical Notes Collection (ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-11), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. Hargis + Associates, Inc., 1996. Final Remedial Investigation Report, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. March 28, 1996. _____, 2012. Final 5-Year Remedy Review Report, July 2004 – March 2010, Chatham Site, Escondido, California, Revision 1.0. August 24, 2012. _____, 2014a. Annual Monitoring Submittal and Conceptual Site Model Update, April 2014, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. July 11, 2014. _____, 2014b. Monitoring and Contingency Plan, Chatham Site, Escondido, California, Revision 2.2. September 12, 2014.
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
41
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
_____, 2015a. Technical Memorandum from G. Cranham and J. Schwall to E. Modiano, de maximis, inc., re: Felicita Creek Evaluation Update, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. January 16, 2015. _____, 2015b. Annual Monitoring Submittal and Conceptual Site Model Update, April 2015, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. June 29, 2015. _____, 2015c. Semi Annual Monitoring Submittal, Chatham Site, Escondido, California. December 15, 2015. Pant, P., M. Allen, Y. Cai, K. Jayachandran, and Y. Cehn, 2007. Influence of Physical Factors on Trichloroethylene Evaporation from Surface Water. Water Air Soil Pollution 183:153-163, March 8, 2007. Toombes, L. and H. Chanson, 2000. Air-Water Flow and Gas Transfer at Aeration Cascades: A Comparative Study of Smooth and Stepped Chutes. In: Minor, H. E. and Hager, W. H., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways. International Workshop on Hydraulics of Stepped Spillways, Zurich, Switzerland, (77-84). 22-24 March 2000. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1999. Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet, Infiltration Trench, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., EPA 832-F-99-019. September, 1999. _____, 2011. Integrated Report (Clean Water Section 303(d)/305(6) Report). October 11, 2011. Van Dijk, J.C., 2007. Drinking Water: Water Treatment Technology, Sanitary Engineering Department, CT 4471, Delft University of Technology. September 2007. Washington Department of Forestry, 2004. Boulder Clusters. 2004. Retrieved on November 16, 2015 at https://www.wou.edu/las/physci/taylor/g407/restoration/WA_Dept_Forestory_ 2004_Boulder_Clusters.pdf
724_H01_2015-2_FE FC_txt.docx 12-21-15
42
TABLE 1 PREVALENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND 1,4-DIOXANE IN GROUNDWATER …..…………………….CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)…………………………
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER
DATE SAMPLED
QUALITY ASSURANCE CODE
MW-53
MW-53-20140423 MW-53-20141028 MW-53-20150422
04/23/14 10/28/14 04/22/15
ORG ORG ORG
440-76645-14 440-91616-4 440-107818-15
7.0 7.5 3.9
4.4 4.6 3.0
1.4 1.5 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0
0.60 0.75 <0.50
1.2 1.2 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0
----
MW-54
MW-54-20140423 MW-5400-20140423 MW-54-20141029 MW-54-20150423 MW-5400-20150423 MW-54-20151020
04/23/14 04/23/14 10/29/14 04/23/15 04/23/15 10/20/15
ORG FD ORG ORG FD ORG
440-76645-9 440-76645-10 440-91701-3 440-107927-14 440-107927-15 440-124888-29
5.9 6.1 29 6.7 6.2 21
2.7 2.6 18 3.2 3.0 14
1.4 1.5 5.0 1.2 1.1 3.4
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50 1.3 <0.50 <0.50 0.70
<1.0 <1.0 2.3 <1.0 <1.0 1.7
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
24 23 32 24 21 22
MW-58
MW-58-20140425 MW-58-20141030 MW-58-20150422 MW-58-20151021
04/25/14 10/30/14 04/22/15 10/21/15
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76843-9 440-91798-6 440-107818-12 440-124986-2
7.9 22 12 9.4
4.7 15 7.1 6.0
3.3 7.5 4.5 3.2
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1.9 5.1 2.9 2.0
1.2 4.0 1.8 1.3
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
15 24 25 17
MW-66
MW-66-20140425 MW-66-20141029 MW-66-20150422 MW-66-20151020
04/25/14 10/29/14 04/22/15 10/20/15
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76843-10 440-91701-4 440-107818-13 440-124888-30
120 92 98 87
78 64 62 60
30 26 27 25
<2.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
18 14 16 15
23 16 17 16
<2.5 1.1 1.1 1.2
-----
MW-70
MW-70-20140423 MW-7000-20140423 MW-70-20141029 MW-70-20150423 MW-70-20151020
04/23/14 04/23/14 10/29/14 04/23/15 10/20/15
ORG FD ORG ORG ORG
440-76645-11 440-76645-12 440-91701-6 440-107927-16 440-124888-28
46 45 49 40 26
24 22 28 19 14
11 11 12 8.8 31
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4.3 4.0 5.6 4.6 3.2
6.8 6.5 6.4 5.0 3.8
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
------
MW-71
MW-71-20140425 MW-71-20150422
04/25/14 04/22/15
ORG ORG
440-76843-3 440-107927-8
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
---
33-R3
33-R3-20140422 33-R3-20150422
04/22/14 04/22/15
ORG ORG
440-7693-6 440-107818-9
2.1 <1.0
1.3 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50
<1.0 <1.0
<1.0 <1.0
<2.0 <2.0
34-N5
34-N5-20140422 34-N5-20140723 34-N5-20141029 34-N5-20150128 34-N5-20150422 34-N5-20151021
04/22/14 07/23/14 10/29/14 01/01/15 04/22/15 10/21/15
ORG ORG ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76493-3 440-83894-3 440-91697-2 440-100200-3 440-107818-7 440-124981-7
17 11 8.8 26 23 28
10 7.1 6.0 17 14 19
4.0 2.3 2.1 6.8 5.8 7.1
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1.8 1.2 1.1 3.2 3.0 4.2
2.7 1.3 1.3 4.8 3.2 4.7
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11 ---20 --
WELL IDENTIFIER Shallow Monitor Wells
LABORATORY IDENTIFIER
TCE
PCE
cis-1,2DCE
trans-1,2DCE
1,2-DCA
1,1-DCE
1,1-DCA
1,4-DIOXANE
Deep Monitor Wells
Shallow Regional Wells
FOOTNOTES TCE = PCE = cis-1,2-DCE = trans-1,2-DCE =
Trichloroethylene Tetrachloroethylene cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
(<) = (--) = ORG = FD =
Less than; the numerical value is the Limit of Detection for that compound Not sampled Original sample Field duplicate sample
1,2-DCA = 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-DCE = 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,1-DCA = 1,1-Dichloroethane
724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl01_GW_PrevVOCs.xls
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2 DETECTED INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES, FELICITA PARK Analyte Chloride Fluoride Hardness, as CaCO3 Iron Manganese Nitrate as N Nitrate Nitrite as N Nitrogen, Total Percent sodium Phosphorus, Total Selenium Sulfate Total Dissolved Solids Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide BASIN = IM = AMEL = mg/L = N/A = (< ) = Underlined =
CAS Number Units 16887-00-6 16984-48-8 N/A 7439-89-6 7439-96-5 14797-55-8 N/A N/A 7440-23-5 7723-14-0 7782-49-2 14808-79-8 N/A N/A
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L % mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Limitation Type of Value Limit 250 1 -0.3 0.05 10 10 2 60 0.2 4.1 500 500 10
BASIN IM -IM IM BASIN BASIN IM IM IM AMEL BASIN BASIN IM
MW-66
MW-70
MW-58
MW-54
MW-53
5/21/2015 190 <0.50 640 0.051 <0.020 11 11 11 0.012 0.065 <0.010 270 1,100 0.0
5/21/2015 140 -410 0.71 0.046 12 12 12 0.0087 0.1 0.017 130 750 0.0
5/21/2015 300 0.58 940 0.25 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.4 0.024 0.12 <0.010 570 1,900 0.0
5/21/2015 450 0.86 1,200 0.08 <0.020 11 11 11 0.026 0.056 <0.010 560 2,200 0.0
5/21/2015 320 0.51 1,000 0.37 0.056 3.7 3.7 3.9 0.014 0.075 <0.010 450 1,600 0.0
Basin Plan Water Quality Objectives, San Diego Region Instantaneous Maximum Effluent Limitation, NPDES Permit Average Monthly Effluent Limitation, NPDES Permit milligrams per liter not available Less than; the value is the Limit of Detection for that compound Detections over the effluent limitations
724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl02 May 2015 NPDES Analysis.xlsx
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 3 PREVALENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND 1,4-DIOXANE IN SURFACE WATER ..…...…..…………………………...CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)……………………………………….
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER FC-03-20150422
DATE SAMPLED 4/22/2015
QUALITY ASSURANCE CODE ORG
FC-4
FC-04-20140424 FC-04-20141030 FC-04-20150421 FC-4-2151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-3 440-91797-4 440-107701-6 440-124888-3
17 3.7 17 6.5
11 2.5 11 3.6
8.0 2.4 8.2 3.7
3.7 0.98 3.7 1.5
3.2 < 1.0 3.2 1.1
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
31 100 34 --
FC-4N(a)
FC-4N-20151020
10/20/2015
ORG
440-124888-2
7.1
4.5
3.9
1.6
1.2
<0.50
--
FC-5
FC-05-20140424 FC-05-20141030 FC-05-20150421 FC-05-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-8 440-91797-8 440-107701-12 440-124888-8
6.8 5.1 7.9 4.4
4.4 3.6 5.2 2.6
3.0 2.1 3.3 1.8
1.8 1.4 2.3 1.2
1.0 < 1.0 1.2 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
-----
FC-6
FC-06-20140424 FC-06-20150421
4/24/2014 4/21/2015
ORG ORG
440-76720-10 440-107701-11
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50
< 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50
---
FC-7
FC-07-20140424 FC-07-20141030 FC-07-20150421 FC-07-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-14 440-91797-14 440-107701-16 444-124888-14
1.2 < 1.0 1.1 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
<0.50 < 0.50 <0.50 < 0.50
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
25 -35 --
FC-8A
FC-08A-20140424 FC-08A-20141030 FC-08A-20150421 FC-08A-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-15 440-91797-15 440-107701-18 440-124888-15
< 1.0 < 1.0 1.1 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
-----
FC-10
FC-10-20140424 FC-10-20141030 FC-10-20150421 FC-10-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-13 440-91797-13 440-107701-15 440-124888-12
7.9 12 9.1 8.5
5.5 8.4 6.6 5.4
2.0 3.7 2.7 2.3
1.3 2.3 1.6 1.3
1.1 1.3 1.4 1.1
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
26 40 36 --
FC-10N-20151020
10/20/2015
ORG
440-124888-11
8.9
5.6
2.6
1.4
1.4
< 0.50
--
FC-11-20140424 FC-11A-20140522 FC-1100A-20140522 FC-11A-20141030 FC-11-20150421 FC-1100-20150421 FC-11A-20151020
4/24/2014 5/22/2014 5/22/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG FD ORG ORG FD ORG
440-76720-2 440-79226-2 440-79226-3 440-91797-3 440-107701-5 440-107701-4 440-12488-1
27 U 5.3 5.2 25 11 11 < 1.0
19 U 3.4 3.2 10 7.4 7.6 < 1.0
8.8 U 4.1 4.0 15 4.5 4.4 < 1.0
5.4 U 1.3 1.3 5.5 2.1 2.2 < 0.50
4.9 U 1.1 1.1 4.1 1.6 1.6 < 1.0
<0.50 U <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < 0.50
--------
WELL IDENTIFIER FC-3
FC-10N(a) FC-11 FC-11A FC-11A FC-11A FC-11 FC-11 FC-11A
724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl03_SW_PrevVOCs.xlsx
LABORATORY IDENTIFIER 440-107818-8
TCE < 1.0
PCE < 1.0
cis-1,2-DCE < 1.0
1,2-DCA < 0.50
1,1-DCE < 1.0
VC < 0.50
1,4-DIOXANE --
Page 1 of 2
TABLE 3 PREVALENT VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND 1,4-DIOXANE IN SURFACE WATER ..…...…..…………………………...CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)……………………………………….
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER FC-12-20140424 FC-1200-20140424 FC-12-20141030 FC-12-20150421 FC-12-20151020
DATE SAMPLED 4/24/2014 4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
QUALITY ASSURANCE CODE ORG FD ORG ORG ORG
FC-13
FC-13-20140424 FC-13-20141030 FC-13-20150421 FC-13-20151020 (b)
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-6 440-91797-6 440-107701-8 440-124888-5
7.4 6.1 8.6 4.3
4.8 3.7 5.9 2.3
3.9 3.8 5.3 2.6
1.8 1.3 2.4 1.1
1.3 1.1 1.7 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
-----
FC-14
FC-14-20140424 FC-14-20141030 FC-14-20150421 FC-14-20151020 FC-1400-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG FD
440-76720-7 440-91797-7 440-107701-9 440-124888-6 440-124888-13
12 15 13 8.7 7.4
7.9 10 9.1 5.3 4.5
4.8 6.0 5.5 3.5 3.0
2.9 3.3 3.2 1.8 1.8
2.2 2.3 2.3 1.2 1.1
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
------
FC-15
FC-15-20140424 FC-15-20141030 FC-15-20150421 FC-15-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-9 440-91797-11 440-107701-13 440-124888-9
2.2 6.6 4.3 2.8
1.5 4.0 3.0 1.5
<1.0 2.5 1.5 1.0
<0.50 1.5 0.90 0.58
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
-----
FC-16
FC-16-20140424 FC-16-20141030 FC-1600-20141030 FC-16-20150421 FC-16-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG FD ORG ORG
440-76720-12 440-91797-12 440-91797-2 440-107701-14 440-124888-10
7.5 9.8 11 9.4 6.6
4.8 6.5 7.7 6.5 3.9
2.2 3.1 3.6 2.9 1.9
1.1 1.6 1.8 1.7 0.98
1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
------
FC-17
FC-17-20140424 FC-17-20141030 FC-17-20150421 FC-17-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-11 440-91797-10 440-107701-10 440-124888-7
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
< 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0
< 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50
-----
WELL IDENTIFIER FC-12
LABORATORY IDENTIFIER 440-76720-4 440-76720-5 440-91797-5 440-107701-7 440-124888-4
TCE 7.4 6.6 < 1.0 7.4 2.3
PCE 4.7 4.3 < 1.0 4.5 1.3
cis-1,2-DCE 5.0 4.7 < 1.0 6.2 2.3
1,2-DCA 1.9 1.9 < 0.50 2.3 0.80
1,1-DCE 1.4 1.4 < 1.0 1.5 <1.0
VC 0.65 0.70 < 0.50 <0.50 <0.50
1,4-DIOXANE ------
NOTE: trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene and 1,1-Dichloroethane were non detect in all samples (a) Sample collected into directly submerged, unpreserved VOA vial. (b) Additional analyte p-Isopropyltoluene detected at a concentration of 2.1 micrograms per liter on 10/20/15. FOOTNOTES TCE = PCE = cis-1,2-DCE = 1,2-DCA =
Trichloroethylene Tetrachloroethylene cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 1,2-Dichloroethane
724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl03_SW_PrevVOCs.xlsx
VC = (<) = ORG = FD =
Vinyl chloride Less than; the numerical value is the Limit of Detection for that compound Original sample Field duplicate sample
Page 2 of 2
1,1-DCE = 1,1-Dichloroethylene (--) = Not analyzed U = Unusable, data out of trend VOA = Volatile organic analysis
TABLE 4 INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN SURFACE WATER
WELL IDENTIFIER
DATE SAMPLE IDENTIFIER SAMPLED
QUALITY ASSURANCE CODE
LABORATORY IDENTIFIER
County of San Diego Basin Plan Standards:
Fluoride (mg/l)
Nitrate as Nitrogen (mg/l)
Chloride (mg/l)
Sulfate (mg/l)
TDS (mg/l)
MBAS (mg/l)
Turbidity (NTU)
Total Coliform (MPN/100ml)
1.0(a)
10(b)
250(a)
250(a)
500(a)
0.05(a)
20(a)
200(c)
FC-4
FC-04-20140424 FC-04-20141030 FC-04-20150421 FC-04-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-767220-18 440-91797-4 440-107701-6 440-124888-21
<1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
4.7 2.7 3.4 2.4
270 210 240 200
570 390 450 370
1,700 1,400 1,500 1,300
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
70 930 30 5
>1,600(d) >1,600(e) 1,600(f) >1,600(j)
FC-10
FC-10-20140424 FC-10-20141030 FC-10-20150421 FC-10-20151020
4/24/2014 10/30/2014 4/21/2015 10/20/2015
ORG ORG ORG ORG
440-76720-20 440-91797-13 440-107701-15 440-124888-22
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
2.8 4.4 3.3 2.8
250 230 280 250
400 350 430 400
1,400 1,400 1,500 1,400
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
0.55 4.0 0.45 0.45
540(g) >1,600(h) 1,600(i) >1,600(k)
FOOTNOTES (a) = Basin Plan Standards from Table 3-2 for Hodges HA, with exception of Nitrate and Total Coliform, see below for Excerpts. (b) = Maximum Contaminant Level shown for Nitrate as Nitrogen, which applies to surface water with beneficial use MUN (Municipal/Domestic). (c) = Fecal Coliform Water Quality Objective for beneficial use REC-1 (Contact Recreation): "The fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 200 organisms per 100 milliliters." (d) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-76720-19 (e) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-91797-17 (f) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-107701-24 (g) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-76720-21 (h) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-91717-18 (I) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-107701-25 (j) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-124888-24 (k) = Sample collected separately; laboratory identifier is 440-124888-23 MBAS = Methylene Blue Active Substances (Surfactants) TDS = Total Dissolved Solids mg/l = milligrams per liter NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/ 100 ml = (<) = ORG = (>) =
Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 milliliters of water Less than; the numerical value is the Limit of Detection for that compound Original sample Greater than
724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl04_SW_AddAnalytes.xlsx
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 5 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA General Category of Remedial Technology
Potential Remedial Technology Description
Effectiveness
Implementability
Screening Result
Monitor in Accordance with MCP (Baseline)
Monitor in Accordance with MCP (Baseline)
Effective for monitoring the progress of cleanup in the creek Allows evaluation of surface water quality to SWRBTLs Clean up will occur over time by natural attenuation
Established, successful procedure No visual or construction impacts to the Felicita Creek or the Park
RETAINED
Artesian Treatment Vessels
Artesian Treatment Vessels
SCREENED
In Situ Groundwater Treatment in Shallow Groundwater
Air Sparging
Not effective due to inadequate head differential between aquifer and Felicita Creek to allow treatment (Basis of screening) Not effective due to problematic distribution of air in weathered bedrock (Basis of screening) Potentially effective for destruction and reduction of VOCs in Felicita Creek assuming adequate distribution of reagents and consistent reapplication over time Requires extensive injection and monitoring points along Felicita Creek to be effective
Injection of Chemical Reagents such as zero-valent iron or enhanced bioremediation amendments
SCREENED
Page 1 of 4 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl05.docx
Not implementable due to lack of Artesian conditions
Not implementable due to potential short-circuiting of injection solutions into Felicita Creek. Potential for treatment byproducts to surface in creek due to incomplete reaction (Basis of screening). Installation of delivery points hampered by existing park features (creek, trees, boulders) Ongoing injection of reagents required Visual, construction, and operating impacts to Felicita Creek or FCP
SCREENED
TABLE 5 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA General Category of Remedial Technology In Situ Groundwater Treatment in Shallow Groundwater (continued)
Potential Remedial Technology Description Phytoremediation Along Creek
Effectiveness Potentially effective for treating and minimizing VOC impacts in Felicita Creek, but effectiveness would be delayed until establishment of sufficient plant transpiration.
Implementability
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Potentially effective for treating and reducing VOC impacts in Felicita Creek. Would change inorganic water chemistry of creek
Page 2 of 4 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl05.docx
Introduces non-native species in and adjacent to Felicita Creek Plants and associated organic matter reduce groundwater flow in the creek due to plant transpiration (basis of screening) Plants would require large area of FCP along Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC-10 Plants may clog/destroy creek Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required Difficult to implement due to extensive infrastructure installation along and underneath Felicita Creek between surface water sampling locations FC-11 and FC10 (basis of screening) Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required Visual, construction, and operating impacts to Felicita Creek or FCP
Screening Result SCREENED
SCREENED
TABLE 5 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA General Category of Remedial Technology Ex Situ Surface Water
Potential Remedial Technology Description
Effectiveness
Implementability
Bubbler Mechanisms
Inadequate depth in creek for effective volatilization of VOCs (primary basis for screening) System effectiveness may depend upon creek flowrate
Bubbler design would require frequent maintenance due to biofouling and varying depth/flowrate in creek (added basis for screening) Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required
SCREENED
Structures such as weirs, cascades, or boulder clusters, or rip rap
Potentially effective for treating and minimizing VOC impacts in Felicita Creek Preserves water flow in Felicita Creek System effectiveness may depend upon creek flowrate
Boulder/rip-rap design would provide passive treatment minimizing ongoing operations and maintenance costs Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required
RETAINED
Page 3 of 4 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl05.docx
Screening Result
TABLE 5 FELICITA CREEK REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA
General Category of Remedial Technology Hydraulic Containment (Extraction wells) with Liquid Phase Carbon Adsorption Treatment
Potential Remedial Technology Description Hydraulic Containment /Treatment to Felicita Creek
Hydraulic Containment/Treatment to Infiltration Trench
Hydraulic Containment/Treatment to Sanitary Sewer
Hydraulic Containment/Treatment with Irrigation Reuse
Effectiveness
Implementability
Proven technology for reducing concentrations in extracted water Potentially effective for capturing and treating targeted area. Treated groundwater to Felicita Creek may mix with VOCs flowing into creek from outside capture zone Proven technology for reducing concentrations in extracted water Potentially effective for capturing and treating targeted area.
Water resource is preserved Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required Visual, construction, and operating impacts to Felicita Creek or FCP
RETAINED
Potential small loss of flow in the creek if increased evapotranspiration in vicinity of trench(es) due to plant growth Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required
RETAINED
Insufficient capacity in sanitary sewer Complete loss of extracted groundwater, resulting in significant losses of flow in creek (Basis of screening)
SCREENED
Potential moderate loss of extracted water due to evapotranspiration in irrigated areas resulting ins some loss of flow in creek
RETAINED
Proven technology for reducing concentrations in extracted water Potentially effective for capturing and treating targeted area. Proven technology for reducing concentrations in extracted water Potentially effective for capturing and treating targeted area.
Screening Result
ACRONYMS SWRBTLs = Surface Water Risk-Based Tigger Levels MCLs = Maximum Contaminant Levels VOCs = Volatile organic compounds
FCP = Felicita County Plan MCP = Monitoring and Contingency Park
Page 4 of 4 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl05.docx
TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF RETAINED REMEDIAL ALTERNTATIVES ANAYLSIS FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA Potential Remedial Alternatives FC1 (Baseline)
FC2
Alternative Description
Pros
FC1: Monitor in accordance with MCP
Effective for monitoring the progress of cleanup in the creek Allows evaluation of surface water quality to SWRBTLs Maintains the resource with no visual, construction and/or operating impacts to Felicita Creek or the Park Clean up will rely on natural attenuation Protection of Human Health and Environment Easily implementable No additional cost
VOC reduction rate in creek limited by natural processes, VOC reduction not achieved until southern portion of park
FC2: In–Situ Treatment – Enhanced volatilization of VOCs through installation of structures in Felicita Creek (Weirs or Boulder Clusters)
Some methods (boulder clusters) do not require ongoing maintenance Preserves the flow in Felicita Creek
This naturally occurs, just intensifying rate of volatilization to reduce VOCs more rapidly and in shorter distance within the Park Significant engineering design and disturbance of stream bed Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required Visual, construction and/or operating impacts to the Felicita Creek or the Park High cost
Page 1 of 2 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl06.docx
Cons
TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF RETAINED REMEDIAL ALTERNTATIVES ANAYLSIS FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA
Potential Remedial Alternatives FC3
Alternative Description FC6: Felicita Creek Hydraulic Containment (For Disposal see Table 7) Felicita Creek hydraulic containment consisting of extraction wells Groundwater treatment with Liquid Phase Carbon Adsorption
Pros Proven technology for reducing concentrations in extracted water Potentially effective for capturing and treating area along Felicita Creek Extraction well location can be selected to minimize impacts to existing park features
ACRONYMS
MCP SWRBTLs DTSC MCLs VOCs
= = = = =
Monitoring and Contingency Plan Surface Water Risk-Based Tigger Levels California Department of Toxic Substances Control Maximum Contaminant Levels Volatile organic compounds
Page 2 of 2 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl06.docx
Cons Disposal options can be problematic (see Table 7) Multi-jurisdiction approvals/permits required Moderate to high disruption during construction conveyance pipelines from extraction wells to treatment system Visual, construction and/or operating impacts to Felicita Creek or the Park High cost
TABLE 7 HYDRAULIC CONTAINMENT DISPOSAL OPTION ANALYSIS FOR ALTERNATIVE FC3 FELICITA CREEK, CHATHAM SITE, ESCONDIDO CALIFORNIA Potential Disposal Options for Alternative FC3
Alternative Description
Pros
Cons
A
Stream Disposal Return VOC-treated groundwater to Felicita Creek to maintain stream flow
Relatively simple and easy to maintain Maintains resource and flowing creek Potential mixing of VOCs flowing into creek to reduce concentrations from outside capture zone
Groundwater that currently flows to creek contains constituents that will not be treated using carbon, and either A) RWQCB waives discharge limits for NPDES permit (for example - TDS, chloride, sulfate and other non-VOCs) OR B) additional, much more costly treatment with larger footprint would be required If additional inorganic treatment is required, this disposal option not likely feasible. Inorganic treatment generates another waste stream that cannot be readily be disposed of If inorganic treatment not required, lower cost when compared to other disposal options
B
Subsurface Disposal Return VOC-treated groundwater to subsurface by construction of infiltration trench structure(s) to recharge treated water
Permitting may be less stringent for non-Site related compounds as compared to A Maintains water resource (potential small loss of flow in the creek if increased evapotranspiration in vicinity of trench(es) due to plant growth)
Maintenance of infiltration trench would be high due to potential biofouling or plugging (fouling) Greater surface disruption and long-term access to replace/rehabilitate infiltration system Moderate cost when compared to other disposal options
C
Irrigation Reuse
Potentially lower cost when compared to other disposal options
Not viable as a stand-alone disposal alternative due to variability of daily and seasonal demand Water resource is not maintained due to evaporation losses
ACRONYMS NPDES = National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System VOCs = Volatile organic compounds
RWQCB = Regional Water Quality Control Board TDS = Total dissolved solids
Page 1 of 1 724 H01_2015-2_Tbls_Tbl07.docx
FIGURE 2B
FIGURE 6.
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 7 TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN FELICITA CREEK SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS FC-4 AND FC-7, AND FLOWRATE AT FC-7, OCTOBER 1994 TO OCTOBER 2015
900
30
FC-7 FC-4
750
FLOW RATE
20
600
15
450
10
300
5
150
0
0
Month & Year NOTE A hollow symbol indicates trichloroethylene was not detected in the sample; reporting limit is plotted.
FLOW RATE (gallons per minute)
CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)
25
Detection of Trichloroethylene in March 2002 appears anomalous based on data trending and subsequent analysis
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 8 TRICHLOROETHYLENE CONCENTRATIONS, MONITOR WELLS MW-46 AND MW-69 AUGUST 1994 TO OCTOBER 2015
500
CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)
450 400 350 300 MW-46 (Shallow)
250
MW-69 (Deep)
200 150 100 50 0
Month & Year
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC. FIGURE 9 TRICHLOROETHYLENE CONCENTRATIONS, MONITOR WELLS MW-58 AND MW-66 SEPTEMBER 1999 TO OCTOBER 2015
500
CONCENTRATION (micrograms per liter)
450 400
MW-58 (Shallow) MW-66 (Deep)
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Month & Year NOTE: A hollow symbol indicates trichloroethylene was not detected in the sample; reporting limit is plotted.
FLOW
PLAN VIEW
NOTCHED WEIR
NOTCHED WEIR
PLAN VIEW
CREEK WATER SURFACE
DROP HEIGHT
POOLING BEHIND WEIR CREEK W
WEIR
ATER SU RFACE
STRE AM B E
D
CREEK LEVEL PRIOR TO WEIR INSTALLATION
PROFILE VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
STREA
M BED
WEIR
HARGIS + ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS MAY 2015
1 2 3 4
ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Irvine 17461 Derian Ave Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614-5817 Tel: (949)261-1022 TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2 Client Project/Site: Chatham For: Hargis + Associates, Inc. La Jolla Gateway 9171 Towne Centre Drive Suite 375 San Diego, California 92122 Attn: Mr. Jim Schwall
Authorized for release by: 6/25/2015 5:09:48 PM Heather Clark, Project Manager I (949)261-1022
[email protected]
The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Table of Contents Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Isotope Dilution Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 3
1 2 3 4 6 31 32 37 59 67 68
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
69 75 76
12 13 14
Page 2 of 76
TestAmerica Irvine
6/25/2015
Sample Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Matrix Water Water Water
Collected Received 05/21/15 08:15 05/21/15 16:53 05/21/15 09:40 05/21/15 16:53 05/21/15 10:20 05/21/15 16:53
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Water Water
05/21/15 12:40 05/21/15 16:53 05/21/15 14:15 05/21/15 16:53
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 3 of 76
6/25/2015
Case Narrative Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Job ID: 440-110716-1
3
Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine
4
Narrative
5
Job Narrative 440-110716-1
6
Comments No additional comments.
7
Receipt The samples were received on 5/21/2015 4:53 PM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 5 coolers at receipt time were 0.1º C, 0.2º C, 0.2º C, 0.6º C and 3.1º C. GC/MS VOA No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
9 10
GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s) 625: The continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with batch 258691 recovered above the upper control limit for benzoic acid. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes; therefore, the data have been reported. The following samples are impacted: MW-58-20150521 (440-110716-1), MW-66-20150521 (440-110716-2), MW-53-20150521 (440-110716-3), MW-54-20150521 (440-110716-4), MW-70-20150521 (440-110716-5) and (CCVIS 440-258691/2). Method(s) 625: The percent recoveries for the laboratory control sample (LCS) in batch 257104 failed below the lower acceptance limits for the following analytes: 3-nitroaniline; 4-chloroaniline and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine. Low recoveries are possibly due to less than optimal extraction conditions such as fluctuations in heating mantle temp, condenser water temp, ambient light, angle of apparatus, spike solvent, final volume measurements, etc. The affected samples could not be reextracted within sample hold time. Method(s) 625: The %RPD of the laboratory control sample (LCS) and laboratory control standard duplicate (LCSD) for preparation batch 257104 recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine; 3-nitroaniline; 4-chloroaniline; and 4-nitroaniline. Method(s) 625: The laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) for batch 257104 recovered outside control limits for 3-nitroaniline. This analyte was biased high in the LCSD and was not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported. Method(s) 625: Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) associated with 257104. The laboratory control sample (LCS) was performed in duplicate to provide precision data for this batch. Method(s) 625: The laboratory control sample (LCS) for batch 257104 recovered outside control limits for benzidine. This analyte was biased high in the LCS and was not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. HPLC/IC No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC Semi VOA Method(s) 8082: Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated with batch 257432. The laboratory control sample (LCS) was performed in duplicate to provide precision data for this batch.(LCS 440-257432/5-A) No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Dioxin No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals Method(s) 6010B: The method blank for preparation batch 440-257300 contained Thallium above the reporting limit (RL). None of the samples associated with this method blank contained the target compound; therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis of sample was not
Page 4 of 76
8
TestAmerica Irvine 6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Case Narrative Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Job ID: 440-110716-1 (Continued)
3
Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine (Continued)
4
performed.MW-58-20150521 (440-110716-1) Method(s) 200.7 Rev 4.4: The continuing calibration blank (CCB) for analytical batch 440-259054 contained Magnesium above the reporting limit (RL). All reported samples associated with this CCB contained this analyte at a concentration greater than 10X the value found in the CCB; therefore, re-analysis of samples was not performed.MW-66-20150521 (440-110716-2), MW-53-20150521 (440-110716-3), MW-54-20150521 (440-110716-4) and MW-70-20150521 (440-110716-5) No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. General Chemistry Method(s) SM4500 S2 H: Dissolve sulfide analysis was performed for sample MW-58-20150521 (440-110716-1), MW-66-20150521 (440-110716-2), MW-53-20150521 (440-110716-3), MW-54-20150521 (440-110716-4) and MW-70-20150521 (440-110716-5), and the result obtained was a non-detect. As such, the result for hydrogen sulfide was reported as non-detect. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Dioxin Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page.
13
Job ID: 440-110716-2
14
Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine Narrative
Job Narrative 440-110716-2 Comments Revised report to add Acrolein & Acrylonitrile. Receipt The samples were received on 5/21/2015 4:53 PM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 5 coolers at receipt time were 0.1º C, 0.2º C, 0.2º C, 0.6º C and 3.1º C. GC/MS VOA Method(s) 624: The following samples was analyzed outside of analytical holding time due to analytes added in after hold time has passed. MW-58-20150521 (440-110716-1), MW-66-20150521 (440-110716-2), MW-53-20150521 (440-110716-3), MW-54-20150521 (440-110716-4) and MW-70-20150521 (440-110716-5). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page.
Page 5 of 76
TestAmerica Irvine 6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
Acrylonitrile
ND H
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.50
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
Dil Fac 1 1
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
5 6 7
2.0
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
1.7
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
2.6
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
10
Benzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Bromoform Bromomethane
ND ND
1.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane
ND ND
0.50 1.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
Chloroform
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND
0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1
Tetrachloroethene
7.2
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
Trichloroethene
11
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:19
1
Analyzed 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19 05/26/15 22:19
1 1 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/23/15 23:33
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/23/15 23:33 06/23/15 23:33 06/23/15 23:33
Dil Fac 1 1 1
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 102 102 100 100 102 102
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
80 - 120 76 - 132 80 - 128
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - RA Analyte Acrolein Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Result Qualifier ND H %Recovery Qualifier 107 110 102
RL 5.0 Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MDL Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 6 of 76
6/25/2015
8
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.96 0.96
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
8
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
0.96 1.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
9
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
11
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND
0.96 0.96
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
12
2-Methylphenol
ND
1.9
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
13
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND *
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND * ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
0.96 1.9 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
4-Nitroaniline 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene
ND * ND ND
4.8 4.8 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Acenaphthylene Aniline Anthracene
ND ND ND
0.48 9.6 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Benzidine Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND * ND ND
9.6 4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND ND
1.9 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND
0.48 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
0.96
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 7 of 76
6/25/2015
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.48 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.48 0.96 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND ND
4.8 2.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND ND
0.96 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
0.96
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1
10
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.96 0.96 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
11
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
0.96 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND *
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
%Recovery Qualifier 86 78 72
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
Dil Fac 1 1 1
81 78 91
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 13:35
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0048 0.0048
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
4,4'-DDT
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1
Aldrin alpha-BHC
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1
beta-BHC
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1
Chlordane (technical)
ND
0.095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1
delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1
Endosulfan I
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND
0.0048 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1
Endrin
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND
0.0095 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
ND ND ND
0.0095 0.0095 0.0048
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1 1
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
ND ND
0.0048 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 8 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8 9
12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
%Recovery Qualifier 62 92
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:21
Dil Fac 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36
Dil Fac 1
7
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Analyte Aroclor 1016
Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L
D
5 6
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36
1 1
8
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254
ND ND ND
0.48 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36
1 1 1
9
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:36
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 83
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Analyte
Result Qualifier
Chloride Nitrate as N Fluoride Nitrite as N
Nitrate Nitrite as N Sulfate
300 4.1 0.58
RL 25
MDL Unit mg/L
0.11 0.50
ND
4.1 570
D
Prepared
Result Qualifier ND
Result Qualifier ND
13
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 22:18 05/21/15 22:18
1 1
14
0.15
mg/L
05/21/15 22:18
1
0.15 25
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 22:18 05/21/15 22:41
1 50
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Analyzed 05/21/15 23:17
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1
D
Prepared
RL 9.6
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 81
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 96
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte
Percent sodium
Result Qualifier
0.024
RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 17:51
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 16:58
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.0050 0.020
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Mercury
Result Qualifier ND
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte Lead Zinc
Result Qualifier ND ND
12
Dil Fac 50
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
11
Analyzed 05/21/15 22:41
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC) - Dissolved Analyte Cr (VI)
10
Nickel
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
1
Copper
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 9 of 76
6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Silver Antimony Thallium
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0050 0.0050
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.010 0.010
0.25
Selenium
ND
Manganese
4.2
0.040 0.010 0.020
Arsenic
ND
0.010
Iron
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
Dil Fac 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
1 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:58
1 1 1
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 18:15
1
Hardness, as CaCO3
Result Qualifier
940
RL 0.33
MDL Unit mg/L
D
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 06/04/15 10:49
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:15 05/28/15 15:41 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:56
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/21/15 23:54 06/03/15 10:33 06/09/15 16:13
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:21
Dil Fac 1
General Chemistry Analyte
Cyanide, Total
ND
RL 0.050 20 0.025
Methylene Blue Active Substances
ND
0.10
0.00 4.4
0.50
mg/L mg/L mg/L
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Phosphorus, Total Total Dissolved Solids
Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
Result Qualifier
0.12 1900
General Chemistry - Dissolved Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Result Qualifier ND HF
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 10 of 76
5 6 7 8 9 10
Method: SM 2340B - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation - Total Recoverable Analyte
3 4
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued) Analyte Chromium Cadmium
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
3 4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1
Result Qualifier ND ND ND
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.50
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
Dil Fac 1 1
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
5 6 7
Acrylonitrile
ND H
2.0
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
1.0 17
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
15
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
10
Benzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Bromoform Bromomethane
ND ND
1.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane
ND ND
0.50 1.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
0.77
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND
0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1
Tetrachloroethene
61
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
Trichloroethene
93
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 22:47
1
Analyzed 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47 05/26/15 22:47
1 1 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:01
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:01 06/24/15 00:01 06/24/15 00:01
Dil Fac 1 1 1
Chloroform
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 104 99 101 101 99 104
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
80 - 120 76 - 132 80 - 128
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - RA Analyte Acrolein Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Result Qualifier ND H %Recovery Qualifier 113 108 106
RL 5.0 Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MDL Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 11 of 76
6/25/2015
8
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.95 0.95
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND
0.47 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
8
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
9
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
11
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND
0.95 0.95
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
12
2-Methylphenol
ND
1.9
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND
4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
13
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND *
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND * ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
4-Nitroaniline 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene
ND * ND ND
4.7 4.7 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Acenaphthylene Aniline Anthracene
ND ND ND
0.47 9.5 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Benzidine Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND * ND ND
9.5 4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND ND
1.9 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol
ND ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND
0.47 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND
0.47 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND
0.47 0.47
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 12 of 76
6/25/2015
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.47 0.47
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.47 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND ND
4.7 2.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND ND
0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1
10
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.95 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
11
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
0.95 0.47 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND *
4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
Dil Fac 1 1 1
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:23
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
Dil Fac 1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
%Recovery Qualifier 92 83 78 92 90 109
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0048 0.0048
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
4,4'-DDT
ND
0.0096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1
Aldrin alpha-BHC
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1
beta-BHC
ND
0.0096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1
Chlordane (technical)
ND
0.096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1
delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1
Endosulfan I
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND
0.0048 0.0096
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1
Endrin
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND
0.0096 0.0096
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
ND ND ND
0.0096 0.0096 0.0048
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1 1
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
ND ND
0.0048 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 13 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8 9
12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
%Recovery Qualifier 68 94
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:35
Dil Fac 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51
Dil Fac 1
7
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Analyte Aroclor 1016
Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L
D
5 6
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51
1 1
8
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254
ND ND ND
0.48 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51
1 1 1
9
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 21:51
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 86
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Analyte
Result Qualifier
Chloride Nitrate as N
190 11
RL 25
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared
13
50 1
14
5.5 0.50
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:11 05/21/15 22:56
Nitrite as N
ND
0.15
mg/L
05/21/15 22:56
1
11 270
7.5 25
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:11 05/21/15 23:11
50 50
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Analyzed 05/22/15 00:05
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:44
Dil Fac 1
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC) - Dissolved Result Qualifier ND
D
Prepared
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
Result Qualifier ND
RL 9.7
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 79
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:44
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 101
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 04:44
Dil Fac 1
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte
Percent sodium
Result Qualifier
0.012
RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 22:05
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 17:01
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.0050 0.020
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Mercury
Result Qualifier ND
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte Lead Zinc
Result Qualifier ND ND
Nickel
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
1
Copper
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 14 of 76
12
Dil Fac 50
ND
Analyte Cr (VI)
11
Analyzed 05/21/15 23:11
Fluoride
Nitrate Nitrite as N Sulfate
10
6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Silver Antimony Thallium
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0050 0.0050
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.010 0.010
0.051
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
Dil Fac 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
1 1 1
Selenium Manganese
ND ND
0.040 0.010 0.020
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
1 1 1
Arsenic
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:12
1
Iron
Hardness, as CaCO3
Result Qualifier
640
RL 0.33
MDL Unit mg/L
D
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 06/04/15 10:49
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:16 05/28/15 15:41 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:56
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/21/15 23:55 06/03/15 10:33 06/09/15 16:13
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:21
Dil Fac 1
General Chemistry Analyte
Cyanide, Total
ND
RL 0.050 10 0.025
Methylene Blue Active Substances
ND
0.10
0.00 11
0.50
mg/L mg/L mg/L
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Phosphorus, Total Total Dissolved Solids
Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
Result Qualifier
0.065 1100
General Chemistry - Dissolved Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Result Qualifier ND HF
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 15 of 76
5 6 7 8 9 10
Method: SM 2340B - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation - Total Recoverable Analyte
3 4
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued) Analyte Chromium Cadmium
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.50
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
Dil Fac 1 1
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
5 6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
Acrylonitrile
ND H
2.0
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
10
Benzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Bromoform Bromomethane
ND ND
1.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
12
Chlorobenzene Dibromochloromethane
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
13
Chloroethane
ND
1.0
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Chloroform
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND
0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
Tetrachloroethene
2.6
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
Trichloroethene
3.7
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:15
1
Analyzed 05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15 05/26/15 23:15
1 1 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:30
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:30 06/24/15 00:30 06/24/15 00:30
Dil Fac 1 1 1
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 106 101 100 100 101 106
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
80 - 120 76 - 132 80 - 128
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - RA Analyte Acrolein Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Result Qualifier ND H %Recovery Qualifier 107 109 101
RL 5.0 Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MDL Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 16 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8
11
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.95 0.95
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
8
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
9
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
11
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND
0.95 0.95
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
12
2-Methylphenol
ND
1.9
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
13
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND *
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND * ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
4-Nitroaniline 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene
ND * ND ND
4.8 4.8 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Acenaphthylene Aniline Anthracene
ND ND ND
0.48 9.5 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Benzidine Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND * ND ND
9.5 4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND ND
1.9 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND
0.48 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 17 of 76
6/25/2015
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.48 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.48 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND ND
4.8 2.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND ND
0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1
10
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.95 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
11
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
0.95 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND *
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
Dil Fac 1 1 1
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 14:47
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
Dil Fac 1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
%Recovery Qualifier 100 90 80 82 80 107
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0048 0.0048
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
4,4'-DDT
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1
Aldrin alpha-BHC
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1
beta-BHC
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1
Chlordane (technical)
ND
0.095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1
delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1
Endosulfan I
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND
0.0048 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1
Endrin
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND
0.0095 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
ND ND ND
0.0095 0.0095 0.0048
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1 1
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
ND ND
0.0048 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 18 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8 9
12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
%Recovery Qualifier 49 75
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 15:48
Dil Fac 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06
Dil Fac 1
7
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Analyte Aroclor 1016
Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L
D
5 6
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06
1 1
8
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254
ND ND ND
0.48 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06
1 1 1
9
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:06
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 72
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Analyte
Result Qualifier
Chloride Nitrate as N Fluoride Nitrite as N
Nitrate Nitrite as N Sulfate
320 3.7 0.51
RL 25
MDL Unit mg/L
0.11 0.50
ND
3.7 450
D
Prepared
Result Qualifier ND
Result Qualifier ND
13
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:26 05/21/15 23:26
1 1
14
0.15
mg/L
05/21/15 23:26
1
0.15 25
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:26 05/21/15 23:41
1 50
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Analyzed 05/22/15 01:05
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 05:26
Dil Fac 1
D
Prepared
RL 9.5
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 77
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 05:26
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 102
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 05:26
Dil Fac 1
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte
Percent sodium
Result Qualifier
0.014
RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 22:07
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 17:03
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.0050 0.020
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Mercury
Result Qualifier ND
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte Lead Zinc
Result Qualifier ND ND
12
Dil Fac 50
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
11
Analyzed 05/21/15 23:41
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC) - Dissolved Analyte Cr (VI)
10
Nickel
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
1
Copper
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 19 of 76
6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Silver Antimony Thallium
Iron Selenium
Manganese Arsenic
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0050 0.0050
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.010 0.010
0.37
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
Dil Fac 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
1 1 1
0.056
0.040 0.010 0.020
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
1 1 1
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:14
1
ND
D
Hardness, as CaCO3
Result Qualifier
1000
RL 0.33
MDL Unit mg/L
D
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 06/04/15 10:49
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:16 05/28/15 15:41 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:56
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/21/15 23:55 06/03/15 10:33 06/09/15 16:13
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:21
Dil Fac 1
General Chemistry Analyte
Cyanide, Total
ND
RL 0.050 20 0.025
Methylene Blue Active Substances
ND
0.10
0.00 3.9
0.50
mg/L mg/L mg/L
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Phosphorus, Total Total Dissolved Solids
Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
Result Qualifier
0.075 1600
General Chemistry - Dissolved Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Result Qualifier ND HF
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 20 of 76
5 6 7 8 9 10
Method: SM 2340B - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation - Total Recoverable Analyte
3 4
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued) Analyte Chromium Cadmium
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
Acrylonitrile
ND H
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.50
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
Dil Fac 1 1
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
2.0
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
1.1
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
0.72
5 6 7 8
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
10
Benzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Bromoform Bromomethane
ND ND
1.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane
ND ND
0.50 1.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
Chloroform
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND
0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1
Tetrachloroethene
5.7
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
Trichloroethene
12
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 23:42
1
Analyzed 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42 05/26/15 23:42
1 1 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:58
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 00:58 06/24/15 00:58 06/24/15 00:58
Dil Fac 1 1 1
1,2-Dichloroethane
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 102 101 101 101 101 102
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
80 - 120 76 - 132 80 - 128
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - RA Analyte Acrolein Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Result Qualifier ND H %Recovery Qualifier 109 111 102
RL 5.0 Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MDL Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 21 of 76
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.94 0.94
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND
0.47 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
8
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
0.94 1.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
9
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
11
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND
0.94 0.94
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
12
2-Methylphenol
ND
1.9
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND
4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
13
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND *
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND * ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
0.94 1.9 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
4-Nitroaniline 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene
ND * ND ND
4.7 4.7 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Acenaphthylene Aniline Anthracene
ND ND ND
0.47 9.4 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Benzidine Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND * ND ND
9.4 4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND ND
1.9 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol
ND ND
4.7 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND
0.47
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND
0.47 4.7
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND
0.47 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
4.7
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND
0.47 0.47
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
0.94
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 22 of 76
6/25/2015
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.47 0.47
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.47 0.94 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND ND
4.7 2.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND ND
0.94 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
0.94
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1
10
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.94 0.94 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
11
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
0.94 0.47 0.47
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND *
4.7 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
Dil Fac 1 1 1
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 15:11
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
Dil Fac 1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
%Recovery Qualifier 101 102 82 92 83 117
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0048 0.0048
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
4,4'-DDT
ND
0.0096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1
Aldrin alpha-BHC
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1
beta-BHC
ND
0.0096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1
Chlordane (technical)
ND
0.096
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1
delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1
Endosulfan I
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND
0.0048 0.0096
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1
Endrin
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND
0.0096 0.0096
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
ND ND ND
0.0096 0.0096 0.0048
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1 1
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
ND ND
0.0048 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 23 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8 9
12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
%Recovery Qualifier 57 80
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:02
Dil Fac 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22
Dil Fac 1
7
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Analyte Aroclor 1016
Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L
D
5 6
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22
1 1
8
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254
ND ND ND
0.48 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22
1 1 1
9
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:22
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 73
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Analyte
Result Qualifier
Chloride Nitrate as N Fluoride Nitrite as N
Nitrate Nitrite as N Sulfate
450 11 0.86
RL 25
MDL Unit mg/L
5.5 0.50
ND
11 560
D
Prepared
Result Qualifier ND
Result Qualifier ND
13
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:55 05/22/15 00:40
50 1
14
0.15
mg/L
05/22/15 00:40
1
7.5 25
mg/L mg/L
05/21/15 23:55 05/21/15 23:55
50 50
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Analyzed 05/22/15 03:41
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:07
Dil Fac 1
D
Prepared
RL 9.6
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 76
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:07
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 97
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:07
Dil Fac 1
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte
Percent sodium
Result Qualifier
0.026
RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 22:10
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 17:06
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.0050 0.020
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Mercury
Result Qualifier ND
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte Lead Zinc
Result Qualifier ND ND
12
Dil Fac 50
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
11
Analyzed 05/21/15 23:55
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC) - Dissolved Analyte Cr (VI)
10
Nickel
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
1
Copper
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 24 of 76
6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Silver Antimony Thallium
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0050 0.0050
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.010 0.010
0.080
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
Dil Fac 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
1 1 1
Selenium Manganese
ND ND
0.040 0.010 0.020
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
1 1 1
Arsenic
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:17
1
Iron
Hardness, as CaCO3
Result Qualifier
1200
RL 0.33
MDL Unit mg/L
D
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 06/04/15 10:49
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:16 05/28/15 15:41 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:56
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/21/15 23:55 06/03/15 10:33 06/09/15 16:13
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:21
Dil Fac 1
General Chemistry Analyte
Cyanide, Total
ND
RL 0.050 20 0.025
Methylene Blue Active Substances
ND
0.10
0.00 11
0.50
mg/L mg/L mg/L
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Phosphorus, Total Total Dissolved Solids
Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
Result Qualifier
0.056 2200
General Chemistry - Dissolved Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Result Qualifier ND HF
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 25 of 76
5 6 7 8 9 10
Method: SM 2340B - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation - Total Recoverable Analyte
3 4
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued) Analyte Chromium Cadmium
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,1,2-Trichloroethane Acrylonitrile
3 4
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1
Result Qualifier ND ND ND
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.50
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
Dil Fac 1 1
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
5 6 7
2.0
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
0.54 6.5
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
5.6
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
10
Benzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Bromoform Bromomethane
ND ND
1.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane
ND ND
0.50 1.0
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
ND H
RL 0.50 0.50
0.50
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
Bromodichloromethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND
0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1
Tetrachloroethene
24
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
Trichloroethene
48
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 00:10
1
Analyzed 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10 05/27/15 00:10
1 1 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 01:26
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/24/15 01:26 06/24/15 01:26 06/24/15 01:26
Dil Fac 1 1 1
Chloroform
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) Toluene-d8 (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 104 103 102 102 103 104
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
80 - 120 76 - 132 80 - 128
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - RA Analyte Acrolein Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Result Qualifier ND H %Recovery Qualifier 110 113 106
RL 5.0 Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MDL Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 26 of 76
6/25/2015
8
11 12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.95 0.95
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
8
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
9
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
10
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
11
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND
0.95 0.95
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
12
2-Methylphenol
ND
1.9
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
13
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
ND *
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND * ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
0.95 1.9 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
4-Nitroaniline 4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene
ND * ND ND
4.8 4.8 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Acenaphthylene Aniline Anthracene
ND ND ND
0.48 9.5 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Benzidine Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND * ND ND
9.5 4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
ND ND
1.9 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol
ND ND
4.8 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND
0.48 4.8
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND
0.48 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
ND
4.8
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Diethyl phthalate
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 27 of 76
6/25/2015
14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
1
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.48 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
Dil Fac 1 1
5 6
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.48 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND ND
4.8 2.9 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
ND ND
0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND
0.95
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1
10
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.95 0.95 1.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
11
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
0.95 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND *
4.8 1.9
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
Dil Fac 1 1 1
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 12:24
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
Dil Fac 1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
%Recovery Qualifier 108 91 74 93 77 103
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0048 0.0048
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
4,4'-DDT
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1
Aldrin alpha-BHC
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1
beta-BHC
ND
0.0095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1
Chlordane (technical)
ND
0.095
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1
delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND
0.0048 0.0048
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1
Endosulfan I
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND
0.0048 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1
Endrin
ND
0.0048
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND
0.0095 0.0095
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
ND ND ND
0.0095 0.0095 0.0048
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1 1
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
ND ND
0.0048 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 28 of 76
6/25/2015
7 8 9
12 13 14
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
%Recovery Qualifier 58 81
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 16:16
Dil Fac 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37
Dil Fac 1
7
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Analyte Aroclor 1016
Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.48
MDL Unit ug/L
D
5 6
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232
ND ND
0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37
1 1
8
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254
ND ND ND
0.48 0.48 0.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37
1 1 1
9
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.48
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 22:37
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 76
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Analyte
Result Qualifier
Chloride Nitrate as N
140 12
RL 25
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared
13
50 1
14
5.5 0.50
mg/L mg/L
05/22/15 01:09 05/22/15 00:55
Nitrite as N
ND
0.15
mg/L
05/22/15 00:55
1
12 130
7.5 25
mg/L mg/L
05/22/15 01:09 05/22/15 01:09
50 50
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Analyzed 05/22/15 05:41
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:49
Dil Fac 1
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC) - Dissolved Result Qualifier ND
D
Prepared
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
Result Qualifier ND
RL 9.5
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 69
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:49
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
%Recovery Qualifier 100
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 06/07/15 06:49
Dil Fac 1
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte
Result Qualifier
Percent sodium
0.0087
RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 22:12
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 17:08
Dil Fac 1
RL 0.0050 0.020
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
Dil Fac 1 1
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Mercury
Result Qualifier ND
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable Analyte Lead Zinc
Result Qualifier ND ND
Nickel
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
1
Copper
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 29 of 76
12
Dil Fac 50
ND
Analyte Cr (VI)
11
Analyzed 05/22/15 01:09
Fluoride
Nitrate Nitrite as N Sulfate
10
6/25/2015
Client Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Silver Antimony Thallium
Iron Selenium Manganese Arsenic
Result Qualifier ND ND
RL 0.0050 0.0050
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.010 0.010
0.71 0.017 0.046 ND
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
Dil Fac 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
1 1 1
0.040 0.010 0.020
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
1 1 1
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 21:19
1
Hardness, as CaCO3
Result Qualifier
410
RL 0.33
MDL Unit mg/L
D
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 06/04/15 10:49
Dil Fac 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:16 05/28/15 15:47 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:56
Dil Fac 1 1 1
05/21/15 23:55 06/03/15 10:33 06/09/15 16:13
1 1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:21
Dil Fac 1
General Chemistry Analyte
Cyanide, Total
ND
RL 0.050 10 0.025
Methylene Blue Active Substances
ND
0.10
0.00 12
0.50
mg/L mg/L mg/L
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Phosphorus, Total Total Dissolved Solids
Un-ionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
Result Qualifier
0.10 750
General Chemistry - Dissolved Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Result Qualifier ND HF
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 30 of 76
5 6 7 8 9 10
Method: SM 2340B - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation - Total Recoverable Analyte
3 4
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total Recoverable (Continued) Analyte Chromium Cadmium
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
Method Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2 3
Method 624 625 8081A
Method Description Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Protocol 40CFR136A EPA SW846
Laboratory TAL IRV TAL IRV TAL IRV
8082 300.0 7199
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC) Anions, Ion Chromatography Chromium, Hexavalent (IC)
SW846 MCAWW SW846
TAL IRV TAL IRV TAL IRV
1613B 200.7 Rev 4.4
Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Metals (ICP)
40CFR136A EPA
TAL SAC TAL IRV
245.1
Mercury (CVAA)
EPA
TAL IRV
6010B SM 2340B
Metals (ICP) Total Hardness (as CaCO3) by calculation
SW846 SM
TAL IRV TAL IRV
8
365.3
Phosphorus, Total
EPA
TAL IRV
SM 2540C SM 4500 CN E
Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) Cyanide, Total
SM SM
TAL IRV TAL IRV
9
SM 4500 S2 D
Sulfide, Total
SM
TAL IRV
SM 5540C SM4500 S2 H Total Nitrogen
Methylene Blue Active Substances (MBAS) Unionized Hydrogen Sulfide Nitrogen, Total
SM SM EPA
TAL IRV TAL IRV TAL IRV
Protocol References: 40CFR136A = "Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal Industrial Wastewater", 40CFR, Part 136, Appendix A, October 26, 1984 and subsequent revisions. EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency MCAWW = "Methods For Chemical Analysis Of Water And Wastes", EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983 And Subsequent Revisions. SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater", SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL IRV = TestAmerica Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 TAL SAC = TestAmerica Sacramento, 880 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605, TEL (916)373-5600
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 31 of 76
6/25/2015
4 5 6 7
10 11 12 13 14
Lab Chronicle Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1
Date Collected: 05/21/15 08:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 624
Run
Dil Factor 1
Total/NA
Analysis
624
RA
Total/NA
Prep
625
Total/NA
Analysis
625
1
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
3510C 8081A
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Total/NA
3 4
Initial Amount 10 mL
Final Amount 10 mL
Batch Number 257343
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/26/15 22:19 WK
Lab TAL IRV
10 mL
10 mL
263076
06/23/15 23:33 AA
TAL IRV
1040 mL
2 mL
257104
05/24/15 08:31 IVA
TAL IRV
1040 mL
2 mL
258691
06/02/15 13:35 DF
TAL IRV
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257830
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/28/15 15:21 KS
TAL IRV TAL IRV
3510C 8082
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257621
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/27/15 21:36 JM
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256553
05/21/15 22:18 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 22:18 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 22:41 NN
TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Filtration Analysis
Filtration 7199
1.0 mL 5 mL
1.0 mL
1
256690 256481
05/21/15 18:54 RW 05/21/15 23:17 MN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
12
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
1613B 1613B
1
1044.8 mL 1044.8 mL
20 uL 20 uL
74794 76063
05/26/15 09:19 DXD 06/07/15 04:02 SMA
TAL SAC TAL SAC
13 14
1
Total Recoverable
Prep
200.2
25 mL
25 mL
258235
05/29/15 16:22 APS
TAL IRV
Total Recoverable
Analysis
200.7 Rev 4.4
1
25 mL
25 mL
258939
06/02/15 17:51 TK
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
245.1 245.1
1
20 mL 20 mL
20 mL 20 mL
257348 257658
05/26/15 16:59 DB 05/27/15 16:58 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
3005A 6010B
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
257300 257646
05/26/15 13:18 APS 05/27/15 15:58 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
3005A 6010B
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
257300 257677
05/26/15 13:18 APS 05/27/15 18:15 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total Recoverable
Analysis
SM 2340B
1
258695
06/04/15 10:49 DP
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
365.2/365.3/365 365.3
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256986 256997
05/22/15 20:15 NC 05/22/15 23:15 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2540C
1
50 mL
100 mL
257914
05/28/15 15:41 XL
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Distill/CN SM 4500 CN E
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256984 257068
05/22/15 20:07 EN 05/23/15 14:56 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Prep Analysis
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 D
1
40 mL 40 mL
40 mL 40 mL
256994 257126
05/22/15 21:49 NC 05/24/15 13:21 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 5540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
256721
05/21/15 23:54 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM4500 S2 H
1
259091
06/03/15 10:33 TN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total Nitrogen
1
260389
06/09/15 16:13 TN
TAL IRV
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 624
Run
Total/NA
Analysis
624
RA
Dil Factor 1 1
Initial Amount 10 mL
Final Amount 10 mL
Batch Number 257343
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/26/15 22:47 WK
Lab TAL IRV
10 mL
10 mL
263076
06/24/15 00:01 AA
TAL IRV
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 32 of 76
6/25/2015
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Lab Chronicle Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2
Date Collected: 05/21/15 09:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Batch Type Prep Analysis
Batch Method 625 625
1
Initial Amount 1055 mL 1055 mL
Final Amount 2 mL 2 mL
Batch Number 257104 258691
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/24/15 08:31 IVA 06/02/15 14:23 DF
Lab TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
3510C 8081A
1
1045 mL 1045 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257830
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/28/15 15:35 KS
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Prep
3510C
Total/NA
Analysis
8082
1
1045 mL
2 mL
257432
05/27/15 07:30 AP
TAL IRV
1045 mL
2 mL
257621
05/27/15 21:51 JM
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256553
05/21/15 22:56 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 22:56 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256553
05/21/15 23:11 NN
TAL IRV
300.0
50
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 23:11 NN
TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Filtration Analysis
Filtration 7199
1.0 mL
1
1.0 mL 5 mL
256690 256481
05/21/15 18:54 RW 05/22/15 00:05 MN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
1613B 1613B
1
1035.3 mL 1035.3 mL
20 uL 20 uL
74794 76063
05/26/15 09:19 DXD 06/07/15 04:44 SMA
TAL SAC TAL SAC
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
200.2 200.7 Rev 4.4
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
258235 259054
05/29/15 16:22 APS 06/02/15 22:05 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
245.1 245.1
1
20 mL 20 mL
20 mL 20 mL
257348 257658
05/26/15 16:59 DB 05/27/15 17:01 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
3005A 6010B
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
257300 257707
05/26/15 13:18 APS 05/27/15 21:12 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total Recoverable
Analysis
SM 2340B
1
258695
06/04/15 10:49 DP
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
365.2/365.3/365 365.3
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256986 256997
05/22/15 20:15 NC 05/22/15 23:16 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
257914
05/28/15 15:41 XL
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Distill/CN SM 4500 CN E
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256984 257068
05/22/15 20:07 EN 05/23/15 14:56 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Prep Analysis
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 D
1
40 mL 40 mL
40 mL 40 mL
256994 257126
05/22/15 21:49 NC 05/24/15 13:21 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 5540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
256721
05/21/15 23:55 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM4500 S2 H
1
259091
06/03/15 10:33 TN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total Nitrogen
1
260389
06/09/15 16:13 TN
TAL IRV
Run
Dil Factor
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Batch Type Analysis
Matrix: Water
Batch Method 624
Run RA
Total/NA
Analysis
624
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
625 625
Total/NA
Prep
3510C
3 4
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Type Total/NA
1
Dil Factor 1
Initial Amount 10 mL
Final Amount 10 mL
Batch Number 257343
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/26/15 23:15 WK
1
10 mL
10 mL
263076
06/24/15 00:30 AA
TAL IRV
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257104 258691
05/24/15 08:31 IVA 06/02/15 14:47 DF
TAL IRV TAL IRV
1050 mL
2 mL
257432
05/27/15 07:30 AP
TAL IRV
Lab TAL IRV
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 33 of 76
6/25/2015
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Lab Chronicle Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-53-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-3
Date Collected: 05/21/15 10:20 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 8081A
Total/NA
Prep
3510C
Total/NA
Analysis
8082
Total/NA
Analysis
Total/NA
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
Initial Amount 1050 mL
Final Amount 2 mL
Batch Number 257830
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/28/15 15:48 KS
Lab TAL IRV
1050 mL
2 mL
257432
05/27/15 07:30 AP
TAL IRV
1
1050 mL
2 mL
257621
05/27/15 22:06 JM
TAL IRV
300.0
1
5 mL
256553
05/21/15 23:26 NN
TAL IRV
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 23:26 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256554
05/21/15 23:41 NN
TAL IRV
Dissolved
Filtration
Filtration
256690
05/21/15 18:54 RW
TAL IRV
Dissolved
Analysis
7199
256481
05/22/15 01:05 MN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Prep
1613B
Total/NA
Analysis
1613B
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
200.2 200.7 Rev 4.4
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
245.1 245.1
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
3005A 6010B
Total Recoverable
Analysis
SM 2340B
1
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
365.2/365.3/365 365.3
1
50 mL 50 mL
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2540C
1
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Distill/CN SM 4500 CN E
Dissolved Dissolved
Prep Analysis
Total/NA
Run
Dil Factor 1
1.0 mL 1
1.0 mL
5 mL 1050.5 mL
20 uL
74794
05/26/15 09:19 DXD
TAL SAC
1
1050.5 mL
20 uL
76063
06/07/15 05:26 SMA
TAL SAC
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
258235 259054
05/29/15 16:22 APS 06/02/15 22:07 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
1
20 mL 20 mL
20 mL 20 mL
257348 257658
05/26/15 16:59 DB 05/27/15 17:03 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
257300 257707
05/26/15 13:18 APS 05/27/15 21:14 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
258695
06/04/15 10:49 DP
TAL IRV
50 mL 50 mL
256986 256997
05/22/15 20:15 NC 05/22/15 23:16 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
50 mL
100 mL
257914
05/28/15 15:41 XL
TAL IRV
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256984 257068
05/22/15 20:07 EN 05/23/15 14:56 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 D
1
40 mL 40 mL
40 mL 40 mL
256994 257126
05/22/15 21:49 NC 05/24/15 13:21 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Analysis
SM 5540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
256721
05/21/15 23:55 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM4500 S2 H
1
259091
06/03/15 10:33 TN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total Nitrogen
1
260389
06/09/15 16:13 TN
TAL IRV
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 624
Run
Total/NA
Analysis
624
RA
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Total/NA Total/NA
Dil Factor 1
Initial Amount 10 mL
Final Amount 10 mL
Batch Number 257343
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/26/15 23:42 WK
Lab TAL IRV
1
10 mL
10 mL
263076
06/24/15 00:58 AA
TAL IRV
625 625
1
1060 mL 1060 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257104 258691
05/24/15 08:31 IVA 06/02/15 15:11 DF
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Prep Analysis
3510C 8081A
1
1045 mL 1045 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257830
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/28/15 16:02 KS
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
3510C 8082
1
1045 mL 1045 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257621
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/27/15 22:22 JM
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256553
05/21/15 23:55 NN
TAL IRV
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 34 of 76
6/25/2015
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Lab Chronicle Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Client Sample ID: MW-54-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-4
Date Collected: 05/21/15 12:40 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
3 4
Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 300.0
Batch Number 256554
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/21/15 23:55 NN
Lab TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256553
05/22/15 00:40 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256554
05/22/15 00:40 NN
TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Filtration Analysis
Filtration 7199
1.0 mL
1
1.0 mL 5 mL
256690 256481
05/21/15 18:54 RW 05/22/15 03:41 MN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
1613B 1613B
1
1046.8 mL 1046.8 mL
20 uL 20 uL
74794 76063
05/26/15 09:19 DXD 06/07/15 06:07 SMA
TAL SAC TAL SAC
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
200.2 200.7 Rev 4.4
9
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
258235 259054
05/29/15 16:22 APS 06/02/15 22:10 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
245.1 245.1
10
1
20 mL 20 mL
20 mL 20 mL
257348 257658
05/26/15 16:59 DB 05/27/15 17:06 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
11
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Prep Analysis
3005A 6010B
1
25 mL 25 mL
25 mL 25 mL
257300 257707
05/26/15 13:18 APS 05/27/15 21:17 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
12
Total Recoverable Total/NA Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2340B
1
258695
06/04/15 10:49 DP
TAL IRV
Prep Analysis
365.2/365.3/365 365.3
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256986 256997
05/22/15 20:15 NC 05/22/15 23:16 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2540C
1
50 mL
100 mL
257914
05/28/15 15:41 XL
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Distill/CN SM 4500 CN E
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256984 257068
05/22/15 20:07 EN 05/23/15 14:56 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Dissolved
Prep
SM 4500 S2 B
40 mL
40 mL
256994
05/22/15 21:49 NC
TAL IRV
Dissolved
Analysis
SM 4500 S2 D
1
40 mL
40 mL
257126
05/24/15 13:21 NC
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 5540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
256721
05/21/15 23:55 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM4500 S2 H
1
259091
06/03/15 10:33 TN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total Nitrogen
1
260389
06/09/15 16:13 TN
TAL IRV
Run
Dil Factor 50
Initial Amount 5 mL
Final Amount
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53
Matrix: Water
Prep Type Total/NA
Batch Type Analysis
Batch Method 624
Run
Total/NA
Analysis
624
RA
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
Total/NA Total/NA
Dil Factor 1
Initial Amount 10 mL
Final Amount 10 mL
Batch Number 257343
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/27/15 00:10 WK
Lab TAL IRV
1
10 mL
10 mL
263076
06/24/15 01:26 AA
TAL IRV
625 625
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257104 258691
05/24/15 08:31 IVA 06/02/15 12:24 DF
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Prep Analysis
3510C 8081A
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257830
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/28/15 16:16 KS
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
3510C 8082
1
1050 mL 1050 mL
2 mL 2 mL
257432 257621
05/27/15 07:30 AP 05/27/15 22:37 JM
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256553
05/22/15 00:55 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
1
5 mL
256554
05/22/15 00:55 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256553
05/22/15 01:09 NN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
300.0
50
5 mL
256554
05/22/15 01:09 NN
TAL IRV
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 35 of 76
6/25/2015
5 6 7 8
13 14
Lab Chronicle Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5
Date Collected: 05/21/15 14:15 Date Received: 05/21/15 16:53 Prep Type Dissolved Dissolved
Batch Type Filtration Analysis
Batch Method Filtration 7199
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
1613B 1613B
1
Matrix: Water
3 4
Run
Dil Factor
Final Amount 1.0 mL
1
Initial Amount 1.0 mL 5 mL
Batch Number 256690 256481
Prepared or Analyzed Analyst 05/21/15 18:54 RW 05/22/15 05:41 MN
Lab TAL IRV TAL IRV
1
1053 mL 1053 mL
20 uL 20 uL
74794 76063
05/26/15 09:19 DXD 06/07/15 06:49 SMA
TAL SAC TAL SAC
5 6 7
Total Recoverable
Prep
200.2
25 mL
25 mL
258235
05/29/15 16:22 APS
TAL IRV
Total Recoverable
Analysis
200.7 Rev 4.4
1
25 mL
25 mL
259054
06/02/15 22:12 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
245.1 245.1
1
20 mL 20 mL
20 mL 20 mL
257348 257658
05/26/15 16:59 DB 05/27/15 17:08 EN
TAL IRV TAL IRV
9
Total Recoverable
Prep
3005A
25 mL
25 mL
257300
05/26/15 13:18 APS
TAL IRV
Total Recoverable
Analysis
6010B
1
25 mL
25 mL
257707
05/27/15 21:19 EN
TAL IRV
10
Total Recoverable
Analysis
SM 2340B
1
258695
06/04/15 10:49 DP
TAL IRV
11
Total/NA Total/NA
Prep Analysis
365.2/365.3/365 365.3
1
50 mL 50 mL
50 mL 50 mL
256986 256997
05/22/15 20:15 NC 05/22/15 23:16 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
12
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 2540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
257917
05/28/15 15:47 XL
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Prep
Distill/CN
50 mL
50 mL
256984
05/22/15 20:07 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 4500 CN E
1
50 mL
50 mL
257068
05/23/15 14:56 EN
TAL IRV
Dissolved Dissolved
Prep Analysis
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 D
1
40 mL 40 mL
40 mL 40 mL
256994 257126
05/22/15 21:49 NC 05/24/15 13:21 NC
TAL IRV TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM 5540C
1
100 mL
100 mL
256721
05/21/15 23:55 EN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
SM4500 S2 H
1
259091
06/03/15 10:33 TN
TAL IRV
Total/NA
Analysis
Total Nitrogen
1
260389
06/09/15 16:13 TN
TAL IRV
Laboratory References: TAL IRV = TestAmerica Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 TAL SAC = TestAmerica Sacramento, 880 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605, TEL (916)373-5600
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 36 of 76
6/25/2015
8
13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257343/3 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA
5
MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND
Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
4
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
Dil Fac 1 1
6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 19:32
1
7
Acrylonitrile 1,1-Dichloroethane
ND ND
2.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1
8
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 19:32
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 19:32
1
1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzene
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride
ND ND ND
1.0 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Chlorobenzene Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 1.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Chloroform Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Bromodichloromethane Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Tetrachloroethene Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
1 1 1
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/26/15 19:32
1
Analyzed 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32 05/26/15 19:32
Dil Fac 1 1 1
MB MB Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
%Recovery Qualifier 103 97 100
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Prepared
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257343/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343 Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Acrylonitrile 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0 25.0 25.0 250 25.0 25.0
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 26.9 24.6 25.8 199 24.7 26.3
Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 108 98 103
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130 63 - 130 70 - 130
79 99 105
48 - 140 64 - 130 70 - 130
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 37 of 76
6/25/2015
9 10 11 12 13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257343/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343
3 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike Added 25.0
Analyte 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 26.8
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 107
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
4 5 6
1,2-Dichloroethane
25.0
25.5
ug/L
102
57 - 138
1,2-Dichloropropane
25.0
27.3
ug/L
109
67 - 130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
25.0
26.7
ug/L
107
70 - 130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzene
25.0 25.0
25.4 25.7
ug/L ug/L
101 103
70 - 130 68 - 130
8
Bromomethane
25.0
21.6
ug/L
86
64 - 139
Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene
25.0 25.0
27.6 24.6
ug/L ug/L
110 98
60 - 150 70 - 130
9
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane Chloroform
25.0 25.0 25.0
25.4 22.2 26.5
ug/L ug/L ug/L
102 89 106
69 - 145 64 - 135 70 - 130
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromodichloromethane
25.0 25.0 25.0
20.8 28.4 27.4
ug/L ug/L ug/L
83 113 110
47 - 140 70 - 133 70 - 132
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene
25.0 25.0 25.0
26.6 26.1 26.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
107 104 105
70 - 130 52 - 130 70 - 130
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
25.0 25.0 25.0
26.3 27.9 25.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
105 111 104
70 - 130 70 - 130 70 - 132
Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride
25.0 25.0 25.0
28.1 24.5 20.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
112 98 81
70 - 130 60 - 150 59 - 133
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier 102 99 100
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND
10 11 12 13 14
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: 440-109904-M-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343 Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
7
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0 25.0 25.0
MS MS Result Qualifier 27.7 26.0 25.1
Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 111 104 100
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130 63 - 130 70 - 130
Acrylonitrile 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ND ND
250 25.0 25.0
201 24.7 27.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
81 99 108
38 - 144 65 - 130 70 - 130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
27.1 25.5 26.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
108 102 104
70 - 130 56 - 146 69 - 130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzene
ND ND 1.5
25.0 25.0 25.0
26.5 24.9 26.6
ug/L ug/L ug/L
106 100 101
70 - 130 70 - 130 66 - 130
Bromomethane
ND
25.0
21.0
ug/L
84
62 - 131
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 38 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-109904-M-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343 Analyte Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0 25.0
MS MS Result Qualifier 28.7 24.7
Unit ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 115 99
%Rec. Limits 60 - 150 70 - 130
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane Chloroform
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
24.7 22.0 25.7
ug/L ug/L ug/L
99 88 103
70 - 148 68 - 130 70 - 130
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
25.0 25.0
21.2 28.1
ug/L ug/L
85 113
39 - 144 70 - 133
Bromodichloromethane
ND
25.0
26.2
ug/L
105
70 - 138
0.52 ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
27.7 25.0 28.2
ug/L ug/L ug/L
109 100 113
70 - 130 52 - 130 70 - 137
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
2.9 ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
29.4 28.5 26.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
106 114 104
70 - 130 70 - 130 70 - 138
Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
27.5 25.6 20.9
ug/L ug/L ug/L
110 102 84
70 - 130 60 - 150 50 - 137
Ethylbenzene Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene
%Recovery Qualifier 103 95 101
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: 440-109904-M-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343 Sample Sample Analyte 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Result Qualifier ND ND ND
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0 25.0 25.0
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 27.9 25.9 25.1
%Rec. Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
RPD
%Rec 112 103 101
Limits 70 - 130 63 - 130 70 - 130
RPD 1 1 0
Limit 20 30 25
Acrylonitrile 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ND ND
250 25.0 25.0
196 24.6 26.5
ug/L ug/L ug/L
79 98 106
38 - 144 65 - 130 70 - 130
2 0 2
40 20 20
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
26.7 26.0 26.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
107 104 104
70 - 130 56 - 146 69 - 130
2 2 0
20 20 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzene
ND ND 1.5
25.0 25.0 25.0
26.4 25.4 26.7
ug/L ug/L ug/L
106 102 101
70 - 130 70 - 130 66 - 130
0 2 0
20 20 20
Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
21.4 29.2 24.8
ug/L ug/L ug/L
85 117 99
62 - 131 60 - 150 70 - 130
2 2 0
25 25 20
Dibromochloromethane Chloroethane Chloroform
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
25.0 22.1 25.7
ug/L ug/L ug/L
100 88 103
70 - 148 68 - 130 70 - 130
1 0 0
25 25 20
Chloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND ND
25.0 25.0
21.5 28.6
ug/L ug/L
86 115
39 - 144 70 - 133
1 2
25 20
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 39 of 76
4 5
MS MS Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
1
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 440-109904-M-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257343 Analyte Bromodichloromethane
1
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Ethylbenzene
3 Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike Added 25.0
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 27.0
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 108
%Rec. Limits 70 - 138
RPD 3
RPD Limit 20
4 5 6
0.52
25.0
27.7
ug/L
109
70 - 130
0
20
Methylene Chloride Tetrachloroethene
ND ND
25.0 25.0
25.1 28.1
ug/L ug/L
100 112
52 - 130 70 - 137
0 0
20 20
7
Toluene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
2.9 ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
28.9 28.2 26.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
104 113 105
70 - 130 70 - 130 70 - 138
2 1 1
20 20 25
8
Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride
ND ND ND
25.0 25.0 25.0
28.7 25.6 22.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
115 103 89
70 - 130 60 - 150 50 - 137
4 0 6
20 25 30
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
MSD MSD %Recovery Qualifier 102 97 99
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
12 13 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA
MB MB Result Qualifier ND MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 108 108 105
RL 5.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 27.9
Unit ug/L
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Analyzed 06/23/15 19:20
Dil Fac 1
Prepared
Analyzed 06/23/15 19:20 06/23/15 19:20 06/23/15 19:20
Dil Fac 1 1 1
D
%Rec 111
%Rec. Limits 10 - 145
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: 440-113102-A-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 263076 Analyte Acrolein
Prepared
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0
LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier 107 104 104
D
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-263076/5 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 263076 Analyte Acrolein
10 11
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-263076/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 263076 Analyte Acrolein
9
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 25.0
MS MS Result Qualifier 25.8
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 103
%Rec. Limits 10 - 147
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 40 of 76
6/25/2015
14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 624 - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-113102-A-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 263076 Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA
MS MS %Recovery Qualifier 106 106 103
Surrogate Toluene-d8 (Surr) Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132
6 7
80 - 120
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Spike Added 25.0
MSD MSD %Recovery Qualifier 107 107 103
Limits 80 - 128 76 - 132 80 - 120
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 25.7
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 103
%Rec. Limits 10 - 147
RPD 0
RPD Limit 40
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
9 10 12 13 14
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257104/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104 MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND
8
11
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)
Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4 5
Lab Sample ID: 440-113102-A-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 263076 Analyte Acrolein
1
RL 1.0 1.0
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1 1
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
ND ND ND
1.0 2.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
ND ND ND
5.0 5.0 5.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene
ND ND ND
0.50 1.0 1.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
2-Methylphenol 2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol
ND ND ND
2.0 5.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ND ND ND
5.0 5.0 5.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND ND ND
1.0 2.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 41 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257104/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691 Analyte 4-Nitroaniline
1
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
RL 5.0
MDL Unit ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1
4 5 6
4-Nitrophenol
ND
5.0
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
Acenaphthene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
Acenaphthylene
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
Aniline Anthracene
ND ND
10 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1
8
Benzidine
ND
10
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
ND ND
5.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1
9
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Benzo[k]fluoranthene
ND ND ND
2.0 5.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Benzoic acid Benzyl alcohol Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
ND ND ND
5.0 5.0 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
ND ND ND
0.50 0.50 5.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Butyl benzyl phthalate Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
ND ND ND
5.0 0.50 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Di-n-octyl phthalate Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran
ND ND ND
5.0 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene
ND ND ND
1.0 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Fluorene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene
ND ND ND
0.50 1.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
5.0
ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1
Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
ND ND
3.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1
Isophorone N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
ND ND ND
1.0 2.0 1.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Naphthalene Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
ND ND ND
1.0 1.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Phenol Phenanthrene Pyrene
ND ND ND
1.0 0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol 4-Chloroaniline
ND ND
5.0 2.0
ug/L ug/L
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1 1
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl
MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 88 97
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 42 of 76
6/25/2015
7
10 11 12 13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257104/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691 Surrogate 2-Fluorophenol
86 83 106
Limits 30 - 120 45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257104/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104
MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 79
Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
Dil Fac 1
05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02 05/24/15 08:31 06/02/15 04:02
1 1 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104 Spike Added 10.0 10.1
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 6.94 7.29
Unit ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 69 72
%Rec. Limits 44 - 142 47 - 116
10.0
6.79
ug/L
68
32 - 129
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10.0
6.62
ug/L
66
10 - 150
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10.0 10.0
6.83 9.63
ug/L ug/L
68 96
20 - 124 49 - 111
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.03 9.32 8.88
ug/L ug/L ug/L
90 93 89
37 - 144 39 - 135 32 - 119
2,4-Dinitrophenol 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2-Chloronaphthalene
20.0 10.0 10.0
21.6 9.86 8.13
ug/L ug/L ug/L
108 99 81
50 - 150 50 - 150 60 - 118
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylphenol
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.42 7.83 8.72
ug/L ug/L ug/L
84 78 87
23 - 134 47 - 101 29 - 122
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.80 9.03 ND *
ug/L ug/L ug/L
98 90 6
47 - 115 29 - 150 10 - 150
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
10.0 20.0 10.0
3.00 J * 21.5 9.01
ug/L ug/L ug/L
30 108 90
43 - 114 10 - 150 53 - 127
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4-Nitroaniline
10.0 10.0 10.0
10.5 8.03 6.16
ug/L ug/L ug/L
105 80 62
22 - 147 25 - 150 45 - 119
4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene
20.0 10.0 10.0
18.5 8.61 8.53
ug/L ug/L ug/L
92 86 85
10 - 132 47 - 145 33 - 145
Aniline Anthracene Benzidine
10.0 10.0 10.0
5.89 J 9.38 6.75 J *
ug/L ug/L ug/L
59 94 68
34 - 110 27 - 133 5 - 66
Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b]fluoranthene
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.53 10.1 9.80
ug/L ug/L ug/L
95 101 98
33 - 143 17 - 150 24 - 150
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzoic acid
10.0 10.0 10.0
12.5 9.65 12.0
ug/L ug/L ug/L
125 97 120
10 - 150 11 - 150 22 - 139
Benzyl alcohol
10.0
8.43
ug/L
84
43 - 115
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 43 of 76
4
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257104/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691
3
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104
Analyte Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Spike Added 10.0 10.0
%Rec 77 79
%Rec. Limits 33 - 150 12 - 150
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Butyl benzyl phthalate
10.0 10.0 10.0
7.59 10.8 10.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
76 108 103
47 - 103 10 - 150 10 - 150
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate
10.0 10.0
9.87 10.3
ug/L ug/L
99 103
17 - 150 10 - 118
Di-n-octyl phthalate
10.0
10.7
ug/L
107
10 - 146
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran Diethyl phthalate
10.0 10.0 10.0
11.2 8.21 8.73
ug/L ug/L ug/L
112 82 87
10 - 150 51 - 109 10 - 114
Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene Fluorene
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.66 9.58 8.19
ug/L ug/L ug/L
87 96 82
10 - 112 26 - 137 59 - 121
Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.68 4.77 3.56 J
ug/L ug/L ug/L
87 48 36
10 - 150 24 - 116 10 - 67
Hexachloroethane Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Isophorone
10.0 10.0 10.0
5.76 11.6 9.74
ug/L ug/L ug/L
58 116 97
40 - 113 10 - 150 21 - 150
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
10.0 10.0
8.59 8.53
ug/L ug/L
86 85
10 - 150 54 - 110
Naphthalene
10.0
7.74
ug/L
77
21 - 133
Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
10.0 20.0
8.43 19.5
ug/L ug/L
84 97
35 - 150 14 - 150
Phenol
10.0
8.05
ug/L
80
10 - 112
Phenanthrene Pyrene
10.0 10.0
9.44 9.89
ug/L ug/L
94 99
54 - 120 52 - 115
3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol
10.0
9.16
ug/L
92
40 - 115
4-Chloroaniline
10.0
1.26 J *
ug/L
13
31 - 117
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier 93 78 80
Limits 40 - 120 50 - 120 30 - 120
83 81 91
45 - 120 35 - 120 37 - 144
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 7.71 7.88
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 440-257104/3-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691 Analyte 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as Azobenzene) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1
Unit ug/L ug/L
D
LCSD LCSD Result Qualifier 7.11
Unit ug/L
D
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
%Rec 71
%Rec. Limits 44 - 142
RPD 2
RPD Limit 35
10.1
7.84
ug/L
78
47 - 116
7
35
10.0
6.90
ug/L
69
32 - 129
2
35
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 44 of 76
5 6
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104 Spike Added 10.0
4
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 440-257104/3-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691
3
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104
Analyte 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Spike Added 10.0
LCSD LCSD Result Qualifier 6.63
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10.0
6.87
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
10.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
10.0
2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol
4 5
%Rec 66
%Rec. Limits 10 - 150
RPD 0
RPD Limit 35
ug/L
69
20 - 124
1
35
9.65
ug/L
96
49 - 111
0
35
9.18
ug/L
92
37 - 144
2
35
10.0 10.0
9.37 8.60
ug/L ug/L
94 86
39 - 135 32 - 119
1 3
35 35
8
2,4-Dinitrophenol
20.0
22.3
ug/L
111
50 - 150
3
35
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2-Chloronaphthalene
10.0 10.0
9.44 8.40
ug/L ug/L
94 84
50 - 150 60 - 118
4 3
35 35
9
2-Chlorophenol 2-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methylphenol
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.23 8.06 8.62
ug/L ug/L ug/L
82 81 86
23 - 134 47 - 101 29 - 122
2 3 1
35 35 35
2-Nitroaniline 2-Nitrophenol 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.89 9.23 8.21 *
ug/L ug/L ug/L
99 92 82
47 - 115 29 - 150 10 - 150
1 2 171
35 35 35
3-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
10.0 20.0 10.0
11.6 * 21.6 8.46
ug/L ug/L ug/L
116 108 85
43 - 114 10 - 150 53 - 127
118 1 6
35 35 35
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 4-Nitroaniline
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.91 7.83 11.1 *
ug/L ug/L ug/L
99 78 111
22 - 147 25 - 150 45 - 119
6 3 57
35 35 35
4-Nitrophenol Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene
20.0 10.0 10.0
19.5 8.44 9.07
ug/L ug/L ug/L
97 84 91
10 - 132 47 - 145 33 - 145
5 2 6
35 35 35
Aniline Anthracene Benzidine
10.0 10.0 10.0
7.39 J 9.23 ND
ug/L ug/L ug/L
74 92 48
34 - 110 27 - 133 5 - 66
23 2 35
35 35 35
Benzo[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b]fluoranthene
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.60 10.2 9.48
ug/L ug/L ug/L
96 102 95
33 - 143 17 - 150 24 - 150
1 0 3
35 35 35
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzoic acid
10.0 10.0 10.0
13.1 9.23 12.2
ug/L ug/L ug/L
131 92 122
10 - 150 11 - 150 22 - 139
5 5 2
35 35 35
Benzyl alcohol Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.71 9.03 8.16
ug/L ug/L ug/L
87 90 82
43 - 115 33 - 150 12 - 150
3 16 3
35 35 35
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Butyl benzyl phthalate
10.0 10.0 10.0
7.64 11.2 10.3
ug/L ug/L ug/L
76 112 103
47 - 103 10 - 150 10 - 150
1 4 0
35 35 35
Chrysene Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.76 10.3 10.5
ug/L ug/L ug/L
98 103 105
17 - 150 10 - 118 10 - 146
1 0 1
35 35 35
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran Diethyl phthalate
10.0 10.0 10.0
11.0 7.94 8.92
ug/L ug/L ug/L
110 79 89
10 - 150 51 - 109 10 - 114
2 3 2
35 35 35
Dimethyl phthalate Fluoranthene Fluorene
10.0 10.0 10.0
8.59 9.45 8.04
ug/L ug/L ug/L
86 95 80
10 - 112 26 - 137 59 - 121
1 1 2
35 35 35
Unit ug/L
D
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 45 of 76
6/25/2015
6 7
10 11 12 13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 625 - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 440-257104/3-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258691
3
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257104 Spike Added 10.0
Analyte Hexachlorobenzene
LCSD LCSD Result Qualifier 8.20
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 82
%Rec. Limits 10 - 150
RPD 6
RPD Limit 35
4 5 6
Hexachlorobutadiene
10.0
5.07
ug/L
51
24 - 116
6
35
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
10.0
3.59 J
ug/L
36
10 - 67
1
35
Hexachloroethane
10.0
6.01
ug/L
60
40 - 113
4
35
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Isophorone
10.0 10.0
11.6 9.83
ug/L ug/L
116 98
10 - 150 21 - 150
0 1
35 35
8
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
10.0
9.13
ug/L
91
10 - 150
6
35
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine Naphthalene
10.0 10.0
8.85 7.96
ug/L ug/L
89 80
54 - 110 21 - 133
4 3
35 35
9
Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenol
10.0 20.0 10.0
8.32 19.7 8.50
ug/L ug/L ug/L
83 99 85
35 - 150 14 - 150 10 - 112
1 1 5
35 35 35
Phenanthrene Pyrene 3-Methylphenol + 4-Methylphenol
10.0 10.0 10.0
9.10 9.93 9.23
ug/L ug/L ug/L
91 99 92
54 - 120 52 - 115 40 - 115
4 0 1
35 35 35
4-Chloroaniline
10.0
10.9 *
ug/L
109
31 - 117
159
35
LCSD LCSD %Recovery Qualifier 96
Limits 40 - 120
2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol
89 80
50 - 120 30 - 120
Nitrobenzene-d5
86
45 - 120
Phenol-d6 Terphenyl-d14
86 97
35 - 120 37 - 144
Surrogate 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257432/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND ND
10 11 12 13 14
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)
Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT
7
RL 0.0050 0.0050 0.010
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
Dil Fac 1 1 1
Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC
ND ND ND
0.0050 0.0050 0.010
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1 1 1
Chlordane (technical) delta-BHC Dieldrin
ND ND ND
0.10 0.0050 0.0050
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1 1 1
Endosulfan I Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate
ND ND ND
0.0050 0.0050 0.010
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1 1 1
Endrin Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone
ND ND ND
0.0050 0.010 0.010
ug/L ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1 1 1
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ND
0.010
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 46 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257432/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830 Analyte Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND
Methoxychlor Toxaphene
Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene
ND ND MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 65
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
89
RL 0.010 0.0050
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
0.0050 0.50
ug/L ug/L
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
Dil Fac 1 1
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1 1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
Dil Fac 1
05/27/15 07:30 05/28/15 14:25
1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike Added 0.200 0.200 0.200
Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT
D
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 0.175 0.165 0.147
Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 87 82 74
%Rec. Limits 37 - 142 33 - 139 36 - 145
Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC
0.200 0.200 0.200
0.112 0.153 0.161
ug/L ug/L ug/L
56 76 81
18 - 122 32 - 128 29 - 123
delta-BHC Dieldrin Endosulfan I
0.200 0.200 0.200
0.146 0.173 0.168
ug/L ug/L ug/L
73 86 84
33 - 135 32 - 139 32 - 132
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrin
0.200 0.200 0.200
0.171 0.166 0.175
ug/L ug/L ug/L
86 83 88
35 - 130 34 - 141 33 - 135
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.200 0.200 0.200
0.160 0.172 0.151
ug/L ug/L ug/L
80 86 75
27 - 144 30 - 135 32 - 129
Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Methoxychlor
0.200 0.200 0.200
0.162 0.167 0.180
ug/L ug/L ug/L
81 83 90
30 - 133 25 - 142 32 - 150
LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier 62 88
Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND ND ND ND
5 6 7
0.214 0.214 0.214
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.173 0.150 0.148 0.113 0.146 0.159
Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 81 70 69
%Rec. Limits 50 - 125 45 - 125 50 - 125
53 68 74
35 - 120 40 - 120 50 - 120
11
14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 47 of 76
10
13
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike Added 0.214 0.214 0.214
9
12
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
Lab Sample ID: 440-111081-E-1-A MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830 Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT
4
8
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257432/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830
Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
1
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 8081A - Organochlorine Pesticides (GC) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-111081-E-1-A MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830 Analyte delta-BHC
1
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike Added 0.214
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.138
Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 65
%Rec. Limits 50 - 120
4 5 6
Dieldrin
ND
0.214
0.169
ug/L
79
50 - 120
Endosulfan I
ND
0.214
0.163
ug/L
76
50 - 120
Endosulfan II
ND
0.214
0.168
ug/L
79
50 - 125
Endosulfan sulfate Endrin
ND ND
0.214 0.214
0.164 0.173
ug/L ug/L
77 81
55 - 125 50 - 120
8
Endrin aldehyde
ND
0.214
0.155
ug/L
72
45 - 125
Endrin ketone gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ND ND
0.214 0.214
0.170 0.145
ug/L ug/L
79 68
50 - 125 40 - 120
9
Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Methoxychlor
ND ND ND
0.214 0.214 0.214
0.159 0.168 0.185
ug/L ug/L ug/L
74 78 86
40 - 120 50 - 120 55 - 125
Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
MS MS %Recovery Qualifier 63 81
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND
10 11 12
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
13
Lab Sample ID: 440-111081-I-1-A MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257830 Analyte 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT
7
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike Added 0.207 0.207 0.207
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.181 0.158 0.158
Unit ug/L ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 87 76 76
%Rec. Limits 50 - 125 45 - 125 50 - 125
RPD 6 5 7
RPD Limit 30 30 30
Aldrin alpha-BHC beta-BHC
ND ND ND
0.207 0.207 0.207
0.0980 0.151 0.162
ug/L ug/L ug/L
47 73 78
35 - 120 40 - 120 50 - 120
14 3 2
30 30 30
delta-BHC Dieldrin Endosulfan I
ND ND ND
0.207 0.207 0.207
0.156 0.177 0.169
ug/L ug/L ug/L
75 85 82
50 - 120 50 - 120 50 - 120
12 4 4
30 30 30
Endosulfan II Endosulfan sulfate Endrin
ND ND ND
0.207 0.207 0.207
0.180 0.176 0.181
ug/L ug/L ug/L
87 85 87
50 - 125 55 - 125 50 - 120
7 7 4
30 30 30
Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ND ND ND
0.207 0.207 0.207
0.165 0.184 0.150
ug/L ug/L ug/L
80 89 73
45 - 125 50 - 125 40 - 120
6 8 4
30 30 30
Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Methoxychlor
ND ND ND
0.207 0.207 0.207
0.163 0.171 0.197
ug/L ug/L ug/L
78 83 95
40 - 120 50 - 120 55 - 125
2 2 7
30 30 30
Surrogate Tetrachloro-m-xylene DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
MSD MSD %Recovery Qualifier 60 89
Limits 10 - 139 10 - 150
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 48 of 76
6/25/2015
14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 8082 - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (GC)
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257432/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257621
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND
Analyte Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1221
RL 0.50 0.50
MDL Unit ug/L ug/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
Dil Fac 1 1
4 5 6
Aroclor 1232
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
1
7
Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248
ND ND
0.50 0.50
ug/L ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
1 1
8
Aroclor 1254
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
1
Aroclor 1260
ND
0.50
ug/L
05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
1
Prepared Analyzed 05/27/15 07:30 05/27/15 20:51
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 72
Limits 29 - 115
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257432/5-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257621
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike
Analyte Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1260
LCS LCS
Added 4.00 4.00
%Rec.
Result Qualifier 3.15 2.88
Unit ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 79 72
%Recovery Qualifier 79
Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257432 Spike Added 4.00 4.00
Analyte Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1260 LCSD LCSD %Recovery Qualifier 81
LCSD LCSD Result Qualifier 3.22 2.92
Unit ug/L ug/L
D
%Rec 80 73
%Rec. Limits 39 - 145 37 - 137
RPD 2 1
RPD Limit 30 25
Limits 29 - 115
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256553/6 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256553 Analyte Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Nitrate Nitrite as N
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB Result Qualifier ND ND ND
RL 0.11 0.15 0.15
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/21/15 14:06 05/21/15 14:06 05/21/15 14:06
Dil Fac 1 1 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 49 of 76
11 12 14
Limits 29 - 115
Lab Sample ID: LCSD 440-257432/6-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257621
10
13
Limits 39 - 145 37 - 137
LCS LCS Surrogate DCB Decachlorobiphenyl (Surr)
9
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256553/2 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256553
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 1.13 1.52
Analyte Nitrate as N Nitrite as N
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 1.10 1.61
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: 440-110695-L-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256553 Analyte Nitrate as N Nitrite as N
%Rec 97 106
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND F1
Spike Added 11.3 15.2
MS MS Result Qualifier 12.6 24.2 F1
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
%Rec 112 159
6 7
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120 80 - 120
Spike Added 11.3 15.2
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 12.1 23.7 F1
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256554/6 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256554
%Rec 107 155
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120 80 - 120
10
RPD 4 2
RPD Limit 20 20
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB
Analyte Chloride
Result Qualifier ND
Fluoride Sulfate
ND ND
RL 0.50
MDL Unit mg/L
0.50 0.50
mg/L mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256554/2 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256554
D
Spike Added 5.00
Fluoride Sulfate
5.00 5.00
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 4.68
Dil Fac 1
05/21/15 14:06 05/21/15 14:06
1 1
4.78 4.69
%Rec. Unit mg/L
D
mg/L mg/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110695-L-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256554 Sample Sample Result Qualifier 930 ND 130 F1
Analyzed 05/21/15 14:06
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Analyte Chloride
Analyte Chloride Fluoride Sulfate
Prepared
%Rec 94 96 94
Limits 90 - 110 90 - 110 90 - 110
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 50.0 50.0 50.0
MS Result 929 52.3 163
MS Qualifier 4 F1
Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
%Rec 5 105 71
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120 80 - 120 80 - 120
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 50 of 76
8 9
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND F1
4 5
%Rec. Limits 90 - 110 90 - 110
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA
Lab Sample ID: 440-110695-L-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256553 Analyte Nitrate as N Nitrite as N
1
6/25/2015
11 12 13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 300.0 - Anions, Ion Chromatography (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 440-110695-L-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256554 Analyte Chloride Fluoride
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 930 ND
Sulfate
130 F1
3 Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA
Spike Added 50.0 50.0
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 911 4 51.2
50.0
159 F1
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
mg/L
%Rec -31 102
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120 80 - 120
RPD 2 2
RPD Limit 20 20
63
80 - 120
3
20
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256481/4 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256481
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB Result Qualifier ND
Analyte Cr (VI)
RL 2.0
MDL Unit ug/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256481/7 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256481
D
Spike
LCS LCS
Added 50.0
Result Qualifier 48.4
Lab Sample ID: MRL 440-256481/5 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256481
Analyzed 05/21/15 06:41
Dil Fac 1
%Rec. Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 97
Spike Added 1.00
MRL MRL Result Qualifier ND
Unit ug/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256481
D
%Rec 107
%Rec. Limits 50 - 150
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521 Prep Type: Dissolved
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Spike Added 50.0
MS MS Result Qualifier 52.7
Unit ug/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-2 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256481
D
%Rec 105
%Rec. Limits 85 - 115
Client Sample ID: MW-66-20150521 Prep Type: Dissolved
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Spike
MSD MSD
Added 50.0
Result Qualifier 50.9
%Rec. Unit ug/L
D
%Rec 101
Limits 85 - 115
RPD RPD 4
Limit 20
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Lab Sample ID: MB 320-74794/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 75231 Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 74794 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
5 6 7
RL 10
EDL Unit pg/L
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 05/28/15 12:48
Dil Fac 1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 51 of 76
9 10 11 12 13 14
Limits 90 - 110
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Analyte Cr (VI)
Analyte Cr (VI)
Prepared
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA
Analyte Cr (VI)
4
8
Method: 7199 - Chromium, Hexavalent (IC)
Analyte Cr (VI)
1
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 68
Limits 31 - 137
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 05/28/15 12:48
Dil Fac 1
Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
MB MB %Recovery Qualifier 87
Limits 42 - 164
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 09:19 05/28/15 12:48
Dil Fac 1
Isotope Dilution 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 74794 Spike Added 200
LCS LCS %Recovery Qualifier 67
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 235
Unit pg/L
D
%Rec 118
%Rec. Limits 73 - 146
%Recovery Qualifier 88
Limits 42 - 164
11 12 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 258235
MB MB RL 0.000050
MDL Unit %
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-258235/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258939
D
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 0.000474
Unit %
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258939 Analyte Percent sodium
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.024
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.024
Dil Fac 1
D
%Rec 95
%Rec. Limits 85 - 115
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 258235 Spike Added 0.000500
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.0243 4
Unit %
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258939 Analyte Percent sodium
Prepared Analyzed 05/29/15 16:22 06/02/15 17:46
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 258235 Spike Added 0.000500
Analyte Percent sodium
7
10
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-258235/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 258939 Result Qualifier ND
6
9
Limits 25 - 141
Method: 200.7 Rev 4.4 - Metals (ICP)
Analyte Percent sodium
5
8
LCS LCS Surrogate 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD
3 4
Lab Sample ID: LCS 320-74794/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 75231 Analyte 2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
D
%Rec 47
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 258235 Spike Added 0.000500
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.0243 4
Unit %
D
%Rec 46
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
RPD 0
RPD Limit 20
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 52 of 76
6/25/2015
13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 245.1 - Mercury (CVAA)
3
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257348/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257658
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257348 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
Analyte Mercury
RL 0.00020
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257348/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257658
D
Analyte Mercury
LCS LCS
Dil Fac 1
Added 0.00800
%Rec.
Result Qualifier 0.00854
Unit mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: 440-110373-O-1-H MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257658
%Rec 107
Limits 85 - 115
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Spike Added 0.00800
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.00803
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 100
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
Spike Added 0.00800
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.00823
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 103
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
RPD 2
RPD Limit 20
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257300/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257646
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 257300 MB MB
Analyte Lead Zinc Nickel
RL 0.0050 0.020 0.010
MDL Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
ND ND ND
0.010 0.0050 0.0050
ND ND 0.0100
Iron Selenium Manganese Arsenic
Copper Chromium Cadmium Silver Antimony Thallium
Result Qualifier ND ND ND
D
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53
Dil Fac 1 1 1
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53
1 1 1
0.010 0.010 0.010
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53
1 1 1
ND ND ND
0.040 0.010 0.020
mg/L mg/L mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53 05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53
1 1 1
ND
0.010
mg/L
05/26/15 13:18 05/27/15 15:53
1
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 53 of 76
5 6 7 8 10 11 12
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257348
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
4
9
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257348
Lab Sample ID: 440-110373-O-1-I MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257658 Analyte Mercury
Prepared Analyzed 05/26/15 16:59 05/27/15 16:22
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 257348 Spike
Analyte Mercury
1
6/25/2015
13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257300/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257646
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 257300 Spike Added 1.00 1.00
Analyte Lead Zinc
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 1.04 1.00
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
%Rec 104 100
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120 80 - 120
Nickel
1.00
1.05
mg/L
105
80 - 120
Copper
1.00
1.04
mg/L
104
80 - 120
Chromium Cadmium
1.00 1.00
1.05 1.03
mg/L mg/L
105 103
80 - 120 80 - 120
4 5 6 7 8
0.500
0.494
mg/L
99
80 - 120
9
Antimony Thallium
1.00 1.00
1.07 1.03
mg/L mg/L
107 103
80 - 120 80 - 120
Iron Selenium Manganese
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.03 0.985 1.04
mg/L mg/L mg/L
103 99 104
80 - 120 80 - 120 80 - 120
10
Arsenic
1.00
1.01
mg/L
101
80 - 120
Silver
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257646 Analyte Lead Zinc Nickel
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND
Spike Added 1.00 1.00 1.00
MS MS Result Qualifier 1.01 1.00 0.988
Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
%Rec 101 100 99
%Rec. Limits 75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
ND ND ND
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.09 1.03 0.978
mg/L mg/L mg/L
108 103 98
75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
Silver Antimony Thallium
ND ND ND
0.500 1.00 1.00
0.516 1.08 0.959
mg/L mg/L mg/L
103 108 96
75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
0.25 ND 4.2
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.30 0.989 5.22 4
mg/L mg/L mg/L
105 98 102
75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
0.011
1.00
mg/L
104
75 - 125
Arsenic
1.05
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257646 Analyte Lead Zinc Nickel
12
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 257300
Copper Chromium Cadmium
Iron Selenium Manganese
11
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 257300
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND ND ND
Spike Added 1.00 1.00 1.00
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.994 0.982 0.975
Unit mg/L mg/L mg/L
D
%Rec 99 98 97
%Rec. Limits 75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
RPD 1 2 1
RPD Limit 20 20 20
Copper Chromium Cadmium
ND ND ND
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.06 1.01 0.961
mg/L mg/L mg/L
106 101 96
75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
2 2 2
20 20 20
Silver Antimony Thallium
ND ND ND
0.500 1.00 1.00
0.503 1.05 0.949
mg/L mg/L mg/L
101 105 95
75 - 125 75 - 125 75 - 125
2 2 1
20 20 20
0.25
1.00
1.29
mg/L
104
75 - 125
1
20
Iron
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 54 of 76
6/25/2015
13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257646 Analyte Selenium Manganese Arsenic
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total Recoverable Prep Batch: 257300
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND 4.2 0.011
Spike Added 1.00 1.00
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.985 5.09 4
1.00
1.02
Unit mg/L mg/L
D
mg/L
%Rec 98 89
%Rec. Limits 75 - 125 75 - 125
RPD 0 3
RPD Limit 20 20
101
75 - 125
2
20
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256986/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256997
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256986 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
Analyte Phosphorus, Total
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256986/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256997
D
LCS LCS
Added 0.502
Dil Fac 1
Result Qualifier 0.463
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 92
Spike Added 0.502
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.606
Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256997
D
%Rec 97
%Rec. Limits 75 - 125
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256986
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.12
Spike Added 0.502
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.589
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 94
%Rec. Limits 75 - 125
RPD 3
RPD Limit 20
Method: SM 2540C - Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257914/1 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257914 Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB Result Qualifier ND
RL 10
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257914/2 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257914 Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
6 7
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/28/15 15:41
Dil Fac 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 1000
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 1010
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 101
%Rec. Limits 90 - 110
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 55 of 76
9 10 11 12 13 14
Limits 80 - 120
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256986
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 0.12
5
%Rec.
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256997
Analyte Phosphorus, Total
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:15 05/22/15 23:15
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256986 Spike
Analyte Phosphorus, Total
4
8
Method: 365.3 - Phosphorus, Total
Analyte Phosphorus, Total
1
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: SM 2540C - Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-110834-B-1 DU Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257914 Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
Client Sample ID: Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 580
DU DU Result Qualifier 590
Unit mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-257917/1 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257917
RPD 3
RPD Limit 5
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB
Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
Result Qualifier ND
RL 10
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-257917/2 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257917
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/28/15 15:47
Dil Fac 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 1000
Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 976
Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-5 DU Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257917 Analyte Total Dissolved Solids
D
%Rec 98
%Rec. Limits 90 - 110
Client Sample ID: MW-70-20150521 Prep Type: Total/NA
Sample Sample Result Qualifier 750
DU DU Result Qualifier 729
Unit mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256984/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257068
RPD 3
RPD Limit 5
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256984 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.025
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256984/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257068 LCS LCS Result Qualifier 0.202
Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-109961-R-1-B MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257068 Analyte Cyanide, Total
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 20:07 05/23/15 14:55
Dil Fac 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256984 Spike Added 0.200
Analyte Cyanide, Total
D
D
%Rec 101
%Rec. Limits 90 - 110
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256984 Spike Added 0.200
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.204
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 102
%Rec. Limits 70 - 115
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 56 of 76
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Method: SM 4500 CN E - Cyanide, Total
Analyte Cyanide, Total
1
6/25/2015
13 14
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: SM 4500 CN E - Cyanide, Total (Continued)
3
Lab Sample ID: 440-109961-R-1-C MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257068 Analyte Cyanide, Total
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Total/NA Prep Batch: 256984 Spike Added 0.200
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.203
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 102
%Rec. Limits 70 - 115
RPD 0
RPD Limit 15
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256994/1-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257126
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 256994 MB MB Result Qualifier ND
Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
RL 0.050
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256994/2-A Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257126
D
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 0.458
Unit mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: 440-110758-G-2-B MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257126 Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND HF
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND HF
Dil Fac 1
%Rec 95
%Rec. Limits 80 - 120
Spike Added 0.480
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.413
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 86
%Rec. Limits 70 - 130
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Duplicate Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 256994 Spike
MSD MSD
Added 0.480
Result Qualifier 0.421
%Rec. Unit mg/L
D
Lab Sample ID: MB 440-256721/9 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256721
%Rec 88
Limits 70 - 130
RPD RPD 2
Limit 30
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Prep Type: Total/NA MB MB Result Qualifier ND
RL 0.10
MDL Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: LCS 440-256721/10 Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256721
Methylene Blue Active Substances
D
Prepared
Analyzed 05/21/15 23:54
Dil Fac 1
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Total/NA Spike
Analyte
6
Added 0.250
LCS LCS Result Qualifier 0.244
%Rec. Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 98
Limits 90 - 110
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 57 of 76
8 9 10 11 12 14
Method: SM 5540C - Methylene Blue Active Substances (MBAS)
Analyte Methylene Blue Active Substances
5
13
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 256994
Lab Sample ID: 440-110758-G-2-C MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 257126 Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
Prepared Analyzed 05/22/15 21:49 05/24/15 13:20
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Prep Type: Dissolved Prep Batch: 256994 Spike Added 0.480
Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
4
7
Method: SM 4500 S2 D - Sulfide, Total
Analyte Sulfide, Dissolved
1
6/25/2015
QC Sample Results Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Method: SM 5540C - Methylene Blue Active Substances (MBAS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MS Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256721 Analyte Methylene Blue Active Substances
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
Methylene Blue Active Substances
Sample Sample Result Qualifier ND
3
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 0.250
MS MS Result Qualifier 0.246
Unit mg/L
Lab Sample ID: 440-110716-1 MSD Matrix: Water Analysis Batch: 256721 Analyte
1
D
%Rec 75
5
%Rec. Limits 50 - 125
6
Client Sample ID: MW-58-20150521 Prep Type: Total/NA Spike Added 0.250
MSD MSD Result Qualifier 0.266
Unit mg/L
D
%Rec 83
%Rec. Limits 50 - 125
4
RPD 8
RPD Limit 20
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 58 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
GC/MS VOA
3
Analysis Batch: 257343 Lab Sample ID 440-109904-M-1 MS 440-109904-M-1 MSD 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 624 624 624
Prep Batch
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
624 624 624
440-110716-5 LCS 440-257343/4
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
624 624
MB 440-257343/3
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
624
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 - RA 440-110716-2 - RA 440-110716-3 - RA
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 624 624 624
440-110716-4 - RA 440-110716-5 - RA 440-113102-A-1 MS
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Matrix Spike
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
624 624 624
440-113102-A-1 MSD LCS 440-263076/5 MB 440-263076/4
Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
624 624 624
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water
Method 625 625
440-110716-3
MW-53-20150521
Total/NA
Water
625
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
625 625
LCS 440-257104/2-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
625
LCSD 440-257104/3-A
Lab Control Sample Dup
Total/NA
Water
625
MB 440-257104/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
625
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 625 625 625
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 LCS 440-257104/2-A
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
625 625 625
257104 257104 257104
LCSD 440-257104/3-A MB 440-257104/1-A
Lab Control Sample Dup Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
625 625
257104 257104
5 6 7 8 9
Analysis Batch: 263076 Prep Batch
10 11 12 13 14
GC/MS Semi VOA Prep Batch: 257104 Prep Batch
Analysis Batch: 258691 Prep Batch 257104 257104 257104
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 59 of 76
4
6/25/2015
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
GC Semi VOA
3
Prep Batch: 257432 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 3510C 3510C 3510C
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 440-111081-E-1-A MS
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Matrix Spike
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
3510C 3510C 3510C
440-111081-I-1-A MSD LCS 440-257432/2-A
Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
3510C 3510C
LCS 440-257432/5-A
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
3510C
LCSD 440-257432/6-A MB 440-257432/1-A
Lab Control Sample Dup Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
3510C 3510C
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 8082 8082 8082
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 LCS 440-257432/5-A
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
LCSD 440-257432/6-A MB 440-257432/1-A
Lab Control Sample Dup Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 440-111081-E-1-A MS 440-111081-I-1-A MSD LCS 440-257432/2-A MB 440-257432/1-A
Prep Batch
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Analysis Batch: 257621 Prep Batch 257432 257432 257432
11
8082 8082 8082
257432 257432 257432
13
Water Water
8082 8082
257432 257432
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 8081A 8081A 8081A
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Matrix Spike
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
8081A 8081A 8081A
257432 257432 257432
Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
8081A 8081A 8081A
257432 257432 257432
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-2 MS
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-66-20150521
Prep Type Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 7199 7199 7199
440-110716-2 MSD 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water Water
7199 7199 7199
256690 256690 256690
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256481/7 MB 440-256481/4
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Dissolved Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
7199 7199 7199
256690
MRL 440-256481/5
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
7199
Analysis Batch: 257830 Prep Batch 257432 257432 257432
HPLC/IC Analysis Batch: 256481 Prep Batch 256690 256690 256690
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 60 of 76
6/25/2015
12 14
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
HPLC/IC (Continued)
3
Analysis Batch: 256553 Lab Sample ID 440-110695-L-1 MS 440-110695-L-1 MSD 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 300.0 300.0 300.0
440-110716-2 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
MW-66-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
300.0 300.0 300.0
440-110716-4 440-110716-4
MW-54-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
300.0 300.0
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Total/NA
Water
300.0
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256553/2 MB 440-256553/6
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
300.0 300.0 300.0
Lab Sample ID 440-110695-L-1 MS 440-110695-L-1 MSD 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 300.0 300.0 300.0
440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-2
MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-66-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
300.0 300.0 300.0
440-110716-3 440-110716-3
MW-53-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
300.0 300.0
440-110716-4
MW-54-20150521
Total/NA
Water
300.0
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
300.0 300.0
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Total/NA
Water
300.0
LCS 440-256554/2 MB 440-256554/6
Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
300.0 300.0
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-2 MS
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-66-20150521
Prep Type Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Matrix Water Water Water
Method Filtration Filtration Filtration
440-110716-2 MSD 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water Water
Filtration Filtration Filtration
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Dissolved
Water
Filtration
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 1613B 1613B 1613B
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 LCS 320-74794/2-A
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
1613B 1613B 1613B
Prep Batch
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Analysis Batch: 256554
11 Prep Batch
12 13 14
Filtration Batch: 256690 Prep Batch
Specialty Organics Prep Batch: 74794 Prep Batch
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 61 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Specialty Organics (Continued)
3
Prep Batch: 74794 (Continued) Lab Sample ID MB 320-74794/1-A
Client Sample ID Method Blank
Prep Type Total/NA
Matrix Water
Method 1613B
Prep Batch
Client Sample ID Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water
Method 1613B 1613B
Prep Batch 74794 74794
4 5
Analysis Batch: 75231 Lab Sample ID LCS 320-74794/2-A MB 320-74794/1-A
1
6 7 8
Analysis Batch: 76063 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 1613B 1613B 1613B
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
1613B 1613B
Prep Batch 74794 74794 74794
10
74794 74794
11
9
12
Metals Prep Batch: 257300
13
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 3005A 3005A 3005A
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water Water
3005A 3005A 3005A
440-110716-5 LCS 440-257300/2-A MB 440-257300/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water Water
3005A 3005A 3005A
Lab Sample ID 440-110373-O-1-H MS 440-110373-O-1-I MSD
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water
Method 245.1 245.1
440-110716-1
MW-58-20150521
Total/NA
Water
245.1
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
245.1 245.1 245.1
440-110716-5 LCS 440-257348/2-A MB 440-257348/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
245.1 245.1 245.1
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 6010B 6010B 6010B
LCS 440-257300/2-A MB 440-257300/1-A
Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water
6010B 6010B
Prep Batch
14
Prep Batch: 257348 Prep Batch
Analysis Batch: 257646 Prep Batch 257300 257300 257300 257300 257300
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 62 of 76
6/25/2015
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Metals (Continued)
3
Analysis Batch: 257658 Lab Sample ID 440-110373-O-1-H MS 440-110373-O-1-I MSD 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 245.1 245.1 245.1
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
245.1 245.1 245.1
257348 257348 257348
440-110716-5 LCS 440-257348/2-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
245.1 245.1
257348 257348
MB 440-257348/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
245.1
257348
Prep Batch 257348 257348 257348
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable
Matrix Water
Method 6010B
Analysis Batch: 257677 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1
1
Prep Batch 257300
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Analysis Batch: 257707 Prep Batch 257300 257300 257300
12
257300
14
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
Client Sample ID MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 6010B 6010B 6010B
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Total Recoverable
Water
6010B
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 200.2 200.2 200.2
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water Water
200.2 200.2 200.2
440-110716-5 LCS 440-258235/2-A MB 440-258235/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water Water
200.2 200.2 200.2
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method SM 2340B SM 2340B SM 2340B
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water
SM 2340B SM 2340B
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 200.7 Rev 4.4 200.7 Rev 4.4 200.7 Rev 4.4
Prep Batch 258235 258235 258235
LCS 440-258235/2-A MB 440-258235/1-A
Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Water Water
200.7 Rev 4.4 200.7 Rev 4.4
258235 258235
Prep Batch: 258235 Prep Batch
Analysis Batch: 258695 Prep Batch
Analysis Batch: 258939
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 63 of 76
6/25/2015
13
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Metals (Continued)
3
Analysis Batch: 259054 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
Client Sample ID MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Prep Type Total Recoverable Total Recoverable Total Recoverable
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 200.7 Rev 4.4 200.7 Rev 4.4 200.7 Rev 4.4
Prep Batch 258235 258235 258235
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Total Recoverable
Water
200.7 Rev 4.4
258235
4 5 6 7
General Chemistry
8
Analysis Batch: 256721 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA
Matrix Water
Method SM 5540C
Prep Batch
440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM 5540C SM 5540C
10
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
SM 5540C SM 5540C SM 5540C
11
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256721/10 MB 440-256721/9
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
SM 5540C SM 5540C SM 5540C
Lab Sample ID 440-109961-R-1-B MS 440-109961-R-1-C MSD 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method Distill/CN Distill/CN Distill/CN
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
Distill/CN Distill/CN Distill/CN
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256984/2-A MB 440-256984/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
Distill/CN Distill/CN Distill/CN
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method 365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256986/2-A MB 440-256986/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water Water
365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365 365.2/365.3/365
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Matrix Water Water Water
Method SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 B
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 B
12 13
Prep Batch: 256984 Prep Batch
Prep Batch: 256986 Prep Batch
Prep Batch: 256994 Prep Batch
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 64 of 76
9
6/25/2015
14
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
General Chemistry (Continued)
3
Prep Batch: 256994 (Continued) Lab Sample ID 440-110758-G-2-B MS
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike
Prep Type Dissolved
Matrix Water
Method SM 4500 S2 B
440-110758-G-2-C MSD LCS 440-256994/2-A
Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample
Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water
SM 4500 S2 B SM 4500 S2 B
MB 440-256994/1-A
Method Blank
Dissolved
Water
SM 4500 S2 B
Prep Batch
4 5 6 7
Analysis Batch: 256997 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA
Matrix Water
Method 365.3
Prep Batch 256986
8
440-110716-1 MS 440-110716-1 MSD
MW-58-20150521 MW-58-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
365.3 365.3
256986 256986
440-110716-2 440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
9
Water Water Water
365.3 365.3 365.3
256986 256986 256986
10
440-110716-5 LCS 440-256986/2-A
MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
365.3 365.3
256986 256986
11
MB 440-256986/1-A
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
365.3
256986
12
Lab Sample ID 440-109961-R-1-B MS 440-109961-R-1-C MSD
Client Sample ID Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water
Method SM 4500 CN E SM 4500 CN E
Prep Batch 256984 256984
440-110716-1
MW-58-20150521
Total/NA
Water
SM 4500 CN E
256984
440-110716-2
MW-66-20150521
Total/NA
Water
SM 4500 CN E
256984
440-110716-3 440-110716-4
MW-53-20150521 MW-54-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM 4500 CN E SM 4500 CN E
256984 256984
440-110716-5
MW-70-20150521
Total/NA
Water
SM 4500 CN E
256984
LCS 440-256984/2-A MB 440-256984/1-A
Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM 4500 CN E SM 4500 CN E
256984 256984
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Matrix Water Water Water
Method SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D
Prep Batch 256994 256994 256994
440-110716-4 440-110716-5 440-110758-G-2-B MS
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Matrix Spike
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water Water
SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D
256994 256994 256994
440-110758-G-2-C MSD LCS 440-256994/2-A MB 440-256994/1-A
Matrix Spike Duplicate Lab Control Sample Method Blank
Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved
Water Water Water
SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D SM 4500 S2 D
256994 256994 256994
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water
Method SM 2540C SM 2540C
440-110716-3
MW-53-20150521
Total/NA
Water
SM 2540C
440-110716-4 440-110834-B-1 DU
MW-54-20150521 Duplicate
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM 2540C SM 2540C
LCS 440-257914/2
Lab Control Sample
Total/NA
Water
SM 2540C
MB 440-257914/1
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
SM 2540C
Analysis Batch: 257068
Analysis Batch: 257126
Analysis Batch: 257914 Prep Batch
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 65 of 76
6/25/2015
13 14
QC Association Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
General Chemistry (Continued)
3
Analysis Batch: 257917 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-5 440-110716-5 DU LCS 440-257917/2
Client Sample ID MW-70-20150521 MW-70-20150521 Lab Control Sample
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method SM 2540C SM 2540C SM 2540C
MB 440-257917/1
Method Blank
Total/NA
Water
SM 2540C
Prep Batch
4 5 6 7
Analysis Batch: 259091 Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA
Matrix Water
Method SM4500 S2 H
Prep Batch
440-110716-2 440-110716-3
MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM4500 S2 H SM4500 S2 H
9
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
SM4500 S2 H SM4500 S2 H
10
Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2 440-110716-3
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521 MW-53-20150521
Prep Type Total/NA Total/NA Total/NA
Matrix Water Water Water
Method Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen
440-110716-4 440-110716-5
MW-54-20150521 MW-70-20150521
Total/NA Total/NA
Water Water
Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen
Analysis Batch: 260389
8
11 Prep Batch
12 13 14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 66 of 76
6/25/2015
Definitions/Glossary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
2
Qualifiers
3
GC/MS VOA Qualifier H
1
4
Qualifier Description Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time
5
GC/MS Semi VOA Qualifier *
Qualifier Description LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits.
6
* J
RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
7 8
HPLC/IC Qualifier F1 4
Qualifier Description MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits.
9
MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not applicable.
Metals Qualifier 4
11
Qualifier Description MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not applicable.
General Chemistry Qualifier HF
10 12 13
Qualifier Description Field parameter with a holding time of 15 minutes. Test performed by laboratory at client's request.
14
Glossary Abbreviation ¤ %R
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis Percent Recovery
CFL CNF DER Dil Fac DL, RA, RE, IN DLC
Contains Free Liquid Contains no Free Liquid Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference) Dilution Factor Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample Decision level concentration
MDA EDL MDC
Minimum detectable activity Estimated Detection Limit Minimum detectable concentration
MDL ML NC ND PQL QC RER RL RPD TEF TEQ
Method Detection Limit Minimum Level (Dioxin) Not Calculated Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown) Practical Quantitation Limit Quality Control Relative error ratio Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry) Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin) Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 67 of 76
6/25/2015
Certification Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine
3
All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Alaska Arizona California
Program State Program State Program LA Cty Sanitation Districts
EPA Region 10 9 9
Certification ID CA01531 AZ0671 10256
Expiration Date 06-30-15 10-13-15 01-31-16 *
California
State Program
9
2706
06-30-16
Guam Hawaii
State Program State Program
9 9
Cert. No. 12.002r N/A
01-23-16 01-29-16
Nevada New Mexico Northern Mariana Islands
State Program State Program State Program
9 6 9
CA015312007A N/A MP0002
07-31-15 01-29-15 * 01-29-15 *
Oregon
NELAP
10
4005
01-29-16
4 5 6 7 8 9
Laboratory: TestAmerica Sacramento
10
All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority A2LA Alaska (UST)
Program DoD ELAP State Program
EPA Region 10
Certification ID 2928-01 UST-055
Expiration Date 01-31-16 12-18-15
Arizona
State Program
9
AZ0708
08-11-15
Arkansas DEQ California Colorado
State Program
6
88-0691
06-17-16
State Program State Program
9 8
2897 N/A
01-31-16 08-31-15
Connecticut
State Program
1
PH-0691
06-30-15 *
Florida Hawaii
NELAP State Program
4 9
E87570 N/A
06-30-16 * 01-29-16
Illinois
NELAP
5
200060
03-17-16
Kansas Louisiana
NELAP NELAP
7 6
E-10375 30612
10-31-15 06-30-16
Michigan Nevada New Jersey
State Program State Program NELAP
5 9 2
9947 CA44 CA005
01-31-16 07-31-15 06-30-15 *
New York Oregon Oregon
NELAP NELAP NELAP Secondary AB
2 10 10
11666 CA200005 E87570
04-01-16 01-29-16 06-30-15
Pennsylvania Texas US Fish & Wildlife
NELAP NELAP Federal
3 6
9947 T104704399-08-TX LE148388-0
03-31-16 05-31-16 02-28-16
USDA USEPA UCMR Utah
Federal Federal NELAP
1 8
P330-11-00436 CA00044 QUAN1
12-30-17 11-06-16 02-28-16
Virginia Washington West Virginia (DW)
NELAP Secondary AB State Program State Program
3 10 3
460278 C581 9930C
03-14-16 05-04-16 12-31-15
Wyoming
State Program
8
8TMS-Q
01-29-16
11 12 13 14
* Certification renewal pending - certification considered valid.
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 68 of 76
6/25/2015
Page 69 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 70 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 71 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 72 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 73 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 74 of 76
6/25/2015
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc.
2 Job Number: 440-110716-2
Login Number: 110716 List Number: 1 Creator: Blocker, Kristina M
List Source: TestAmerica Irvine
3 4 5
Question
Answer
Radioactivity wasn't checked or is
True
Sample custody seals, if present, are intact.
True
The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. Samples were received on ice.
True
Cooler Temperature is acceptable.
True
Cooler Temperature is recorded.
True
COC is present.
True
COC is filled out in ink and legible.
True
COC is filled out with all pertinent information.
True
Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
True
There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
False
Samples are received within Holding Time.
True
Sample containers have legible labels.
True
Containers are not broken or leaking.
True
Sample collection date/times are provided.
True
Appropriate sample containers are used.
True
Sample bottles are completely filled.
True
Sample Preservation Verified.
True
There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present.
True
Samples do not require splitting or compositing.
True
Residual Chlorine Checked.
True
6
Comment
7
True
8 9
True
10 11 12 IDs on containers do not match the COC. Logged in per COC.
True True
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 75 of 76
6/25/2015
13 14
Isotope Dilution Summary Client: Hargis + Associates, Inc. Project/Site: Chatham
TestAmerica Job ID: 440-110716-2
1 2
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA
3 4
Percent Isotope Dilution Recovery (Acceptance Limits) Lab Sample ID 440-110716-1 440-110716-2
Client Sample ID MW-58-20150521 MW-66-20150521
TCDD (31-137) 81 79
440-110716-3
MW-53-20150521
77
440-110716-4
MW-54-20150521
76
7
440-110716-5 MB 320-74794/1-A
MW-70-20150521 Method Blank
69 68
8
5 6
Surrogate Legend TCDD = 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
9 10
Method: 1613B - Tetra Chlorinated Dioxins & Furans ID HRGC/HRMS Matrix: Water
Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Isotope Dilution Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
Lab Sample ID LCS 320-74794/2-A
Client Sample ID Lab Control Sample
11 12
TCDD (25-141) 67
13
Surrogate Legend TCDD = 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
14
TestAmerica Irvine
Page 76 of 76
6/25/2015
