SCHOOL of LAW 1st NATIONAL ADR COMPETITION 2016

Rules and Regulations 1. General 1.1 The School of Law, Christ University will be holding its 1st National ADR Competition 2016 from 11th-13th February, 2016. This is one of the flagship events organized by the SLCU ADR Board. 1.2 The 1st edition of the National ADR Competition shall consist of three separate events namely, Client Counselling Competition, Negotiation Competition and Mediation Competition to be held from 11th-13th February, 2016.

2. Objectives 2.1 The National ADR Competition aims at providing a platform to eligible participants across law institutes to exhibit their skills, adeptness and understanding of law through various legal exercises.

3. Eligibility 3.1 Only bona fide students of law colleges/Universities pursuing a Three Year/Five Year Degree programme are eligible to participate in the competition. Participation is restricted to the first 16 colleges which have registered for the event. 3.2 There will be one team for client counselling and one team for negotiation and a single participant for mediation (as the mediator). However, no college can be represented by more than 5 students in total. The registration for each event per person will be separate. Please note that there will be only one member per team in a mediation round and the others will have two members for the respective events. Every college can participate in 1, 2 or all 3 events however, there must be separate teams for each event. 3.3 Every event will have a maximum cap of 16 teams which will be based on first cum first serve basis. The final discretion will lie with the ADR Board, School Of Law.

4. Code of Conduct 4.1 All participants must present themselves in a dignified manner. Proper dress code (Western Formals) at all times during the competition is a must for all the participants. 4.2 Use of any electronic gadgets is not permitted during the rounds. 4.3 Participants must not reveal the identity of their University during the rounds or any time before the judges have finished evaluating the participants. All written or oral communications in front of the judges must be in English. 4.4 Scouting, sharing information or any other unethical/unprofessional conduct is strictly prohibited and teams will be disqualified for the same. 4.5 The ADR Board, SLCU reserves the right to disqualify any team for misconduct during the competition. In case of doubts, the decision of the members of the Board shall be final.

4.6 All grievances are to be filed to the Convener of the ADR Board.

4.7 Any attempt to obtain the confidential information (negotiation) or any other information of any of the parties which may give the team an unfair advantage in the competition will result in immediate expulsion of the team and blacklisting of that college.

5. Rules and Regulations 5.1 Detailed rules are provided for all competitions in separate documents. 5.2 Non-compliance with any of the rules will result in disqualification of the team. 5.3 Clarifications regarding the rules can be sought from the organizers via email provided below. 5.4 All match-ups will be decided by the Organizers by a draw of lots. 5.5 The evaluation criteria will be released by the ADR Board along with the Rules for each event.

5.6 All awards and certificates will be distributed at the Valedictory function on 13th February, 2016 5.7 Team codes will be allotted to the respective teams after registering for the Competition and shall remain the same till the completion of Final Rounds. 5.8 Subject-matter of each Round: The area of law which will form the basis for the simulation in each Round is designated and will be disclosed on the first day of the competition.

6. Anti-Scouting Policy 6.1 Scouting in all forms is strictly prohibited. Members or persons affiliated with a Participating Team will not be allowed to observe the Negotiation Sessions of any other team(s).

6.2 The teams are also discouraged from contacting an external source after the disclosure of the problem. The strategy and ideas of the teams must be purely original.

6.3 Scouting, or deemed Scouting shall result in immediate disqualification of a Participating Team and any decision of the in this regard shall be Organizing Committee final and binding upon a Participating Team.

7. Penalties and Disqualifications 7.1 The rules governing the teams will be strictly adhered to and any such deviations thereof can attract penalties which will be at the sole discretion of the Organizing Committee. 7.2 Only the team codes should be quoted at the time of communicating with the judges and their and the identity of the members of the team should not be revealed at any point during or after the Simulation.

8. Awards 8.1 Awards including a trophy and a cash prize will be provided to: Events

Sl. No.

Amount (Rs.)

1.

Best Mediator (Mediation)

5,000

2.

Best Mediator, Runners up (Mediation)

2,500

3.

Winners, Client Counselling Competition

12,000

4.

Runners up, Client Counselling Competition

3,000

5.

Best Team (Negotiation)

12,000

6.

Best Team, Runners up (Negotiation)

3,000

Overall Championship Trophy 8.1 The overall Championship Trophy will be awarded to a team scoring maximum points. 8.2 If the team scoring the highest points, does not win in any of the events, that shall not bar the team from being eligible to win the Championship Trophy. 8.3 The criteria for the same shall be the overall performance and score in the competition and not necessarily winning any event/events.

9. Registration 9.1 Registration should be done by all teams through our website-: www.adrslcu.weebly.in 9.2 The participating team is required to duly fill the Provisional Online Registration Form by 6th January 2016 till 11:59 PM. Spot registrations will not be entertained.

9.3 The registration fees will be Rs.1,000/- per person per event and a separate Rs. 1,000/- per participant for those who wish to take accommodation. 9.4 The list of the top 16 teams selected will be released by 7th January, 2016, by 06:00 PM. These selected teams will receive further details regarding payment, accommodation, team codes etc.

10. Food and Accommodation 10.1 The college will provide accommodation for not more than 5 students per college from 11th morning to 13th afternoon. Further details will be sent to the selected teams after 12th January, 2016. 10.2 All the meals will be provided by the institute during the dates of the competition to all the participants.

11. Clarifications 11.1 Any clarifications regarding the competition, events, rules etc. shall be addressed to the ADR Board, SLCU at [email protected]

Client Counseling 1. Composition of the Team Each participating team shall consist of two students from each college who shall act as the lawyers.

2. Nature of the Competition 2.1 The Competition mirrors a law office consultation between the client and lawyers, in which two law students would be acting as lawyers who are presented with a hypothetical situation which will be brought before them by a Client. 2.2 The participants are expected to extract the relevant information from the client within this time. They may do so by conducting an interview, presenting the client with legal means and a range of alternatives to resolve the problem and a final remedy which they think is adequate. 2.3 The interview with the client is followed by a post-reflection period during which the students, in the absence of the client, analyze the interview and discuss the course of action with the application of relevant laws. 2.4 The post reflective period will be followed by a questioning session by the judge on the concerned matter.

3. Time Limits 3.1 Each team shall be allotted a maximum of 20 minutes to complete the session. This is inclusive of the consultation with the Client as well as the post consultation and the questioning rounds. (15+5) 3.2 The initial 15 minutes must be utilized to interview the Client, wherein, broadly, the team must attempt to extract information pertaining to the simulation, delineate the issues that have arisen, and suggest tenable solutions that may be availed of by the Client. 3.3 After the consultation session, the Client will leave the room, and the remaining 5 minutes of the Round are to be utilized to assess the problem (post-reflective), in which the student will ascertain the relevant course of action to be undertaken and summarize the session and the consequent remedy.

3.4 After the post reflective session the judges will question the participants on the relevant area of law, knowledge of law, and their remedies which has been suggested by the participants. 3.5 No additional time will be given to any team to complete the session.

4. Use of Props and Materials 4.1 The participants are permitted to bring books, stationery and office furnishings for their use during the simulation. While in electronic items only laptops may be used as a part of the office set up, however they cannot be used for any research.

5. Selection of Clients 5.1 The ADR Board, Christ University School of Law shall be responsible for the selection of individuals to play the role of the Client in each of the Rounds.

6. Marking Criteria 6.1 The Participating Teams will be evaluated by the judges based on the following criteria: Sl. No.

Particulars

Marks

1.

Establishing an Effective Professional Relationship

10

2.

Presentation

10

3.

Introduction and Initial Discussion

10

4.

Obtaining Information and learning the Client’s Goals,

10

Expectations & Needs 5.

Problem analysis

10

6.

Courses of Action

10

7.

Assisting the Client to Make an Informed Choice

10

8.

Concluding the Interview and Teamwork

10

9.

Post Interview Reflection Period

10

10.

Ability to answer judge’s questions

10

TOTAL

100

Contact Details 1. Mrs. Tintu Lenin Assistant Professor Faculty-in-charge School of Law, Christ University [email protected]

2. Rajshree Lohia Convener ADR Committee [email protected] +91-8861450136

3. Vedanta Chakrabarty Co-Convener ADR Committee [email protected] +91-7829512656

For further clarifications contact us at – [email protected]

GOOD LUCK!!

SCHOOL of LAW 1 NATIONAL ADR ... -

General. 1.1 The School of Law, Christ University will be holding its 1 st. National ADR .... Assisting the Client to Make an Informed Choice. 10. 8. Concluding the ...

497KB Sizes 3 Downloads 176 Views

Recommend Documents

National ADR Competition 2017 Rules and Regulations.pdf ...
Page 2 of 4. Page | 2. RULES AND REGULATIONS. Participation and eligibility. The competition will be open to all the Law colleges and Law Departments ...

National ADR Competition 2017 Proposition(1).pdf
Problem:II Peter Sam is the adopted son of Anna Chandy, 96 year old widow, of. Late Chandi Iype, a business icon in the sub urban area of the. capital metro ...

National ADR Competition 2017 Proforma.pdf
Page. 1. /. 1. Loading… Page 1. National ADR Competition 2017 Proforma.pdf. National ADR Competition 2017 Proforma.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying National ADR Competition 2017 Proforma.pdf. Page 1 of 1.

11th ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE on ... - The ADR Blog
Mar 21, 2015 - 11th ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE on. 'ELECTORAL & POLITICAL REFORMS'. Organized by West Bengal Election Watch (WBEW) ...

11th ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE on ... - The ADR Blog
Mar 21, 2015 - Expenditure, ECI), Shri Paranjoy Guha Thakurta (Journalist and political commentator), Shri Subhash. Chandra Agrawal (RTI Activist).

SCHOOL OF LAW-graduation list 2014-1.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. SCHOOL OF ...

national school - schoolsports
DEVINDRA. HARYANA. 2008 KOLKATA. 341 SHOTPUT. 16.72. SURABH VIJ. DELHI. 2005 PUNE. 342. DISCUS. 48.50. PRABHAJYOTH SINGH. PUNJAB. 2009 AMRITSAR. 343. JAVELINE. 67.40. DINESH KUMAR PATEL. UTTARPRADESH. 2008 KOLKATA. 344 HAMMER. 59.29. LOKESH YADHAV. U

national school - schoolsports
PRADEEP GHOSH. WEST BANGAL. 1976. 311. 5 KM RW. 22 M. 57.40. MANOJ S DOMBLE. MAHARASHRA. 2005 PUNE. 312. 4*100 MR. 42.8. DELHI TEAM.

Fordham University School of Law
Sep 30, 2003 - ... without charge from the Social Science Research Network electronic library: ... Both were twenty-eight.1 Over the next seven years, Andrea2 ..... was designing computer systems for NASA.53 Andrea approached him first in ...... nati

yale law school - SSRN papers
YALE LAW SCHOOL. Public Law & Legal Theory. Research Paper Series by. Daniel C. Esty. This paper can be downloaded without charge from the.

School of Law University of California, Davis - SSRN papers
http://www.law.ucdavis.edu. UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 312. October 2012. Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard? Albert Lin. This paper can be downloaded without charge from. The Social Science Research Netw

2nd national law university odisha maritime law moot court ... - NLUO
Jan 4, 2008 - CC'd: Manager, Chartering Operations. We have .... Whether mis-description of speed in the second Charter Party amounted to breach and.

2nd national law university odisha maritime law moot court ... - NLUO
Jan 4, 2008 - Attention Team: Management .... Whether mis-description of speed in the second Charter Party amounted to breach and entitled the charterers ...

CLE01 - Ethics of ADR Negotiation & Settlement.pdf
... both organizations and served on. numerous committees in these groups. Frances Harris has been engaged in an alternative dispute resolution process since.

ADR form Kids Klub fillable.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. ADR form Kids ...

National Company Law Tribunal Recruitment 2017 Technical ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. National Company Law Tribunal Recruitment 2017 Technical Member.pdf. National Company Law Tribunal Recruitme

Maharashtra National Law University Recruitment 2018 Teaching ...
Maharashtra National Law University Recruitment 2018 Teaching [email protected]. Maharashtra National Law University Recruitment 2018 Teaching ...

NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY, DELHI Seminar ... -
civil services. If you plan to get into litigation, this ... long essay (6000 words for 40 marks), class presentation/viva based on the long essay (5 marks), class ...

Gujarat National Law University - FGV DIREITO RIO
Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) is one the of premier law universities in India. ... leading law schools in India and a University from the United States of America. ... International Trade Law, laws that are extremely significant in a rapidly

Maharashtra National Law University Bharti [email protected] ...
Educational Qualifications (from Bachelor's Degree onwards) : Degree /. Diploma. Year University /. Institution. Percentage. of Marks. Class Specialization,. if any.

Gujarat National Law University - FGV DIREITO RIO
Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India ... leading law schools in India and a University from the United States of ... Besides technical and organizational support, WTI.

Page 1 TABLE 1. GENERAL FUND REVENUE OF SCHOOL ...
Sep 16, 2016 - 3/ This increase in the "other revenue" category is attributable primarily to a change in the method of compiling the data. In prior years, funds reported in the category "miscellaneous revenue" were distributed to other categories whe