FALL 2015 IBSL 501: INTRODUCTION TO HEBREW BIBLE/OLD TESTAMENT Tuesdays, 1:20 to 4:00 PM, August 18 – December 1, 2015
Rev. Vanessa Lovelace, Ph.D., Instructor Assistant Professor of Hebrew Bible Room: Classroom Building 202
Office: Classroom Building 306 Office Telephone: 404.527.7746; Email:
[email protected] Office hours: Wednesdays 8:00-‐10:50 AM; Thursdays 11:00 AM-‐1:00 PM
All other sessions by appointment ______________________________________________________________________
ITC MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the Interdenominational Theological Center is to educate for the Church and the global community Christian leaders who are committed to and practice a liberating and transforming spirituality, academic discipline, justice and peace, an appreciation of religious, gender and cultural diversity, and a desire to engage the public arena for the common good.
COURSE DESCRIPTION Theological students who are committed to and practice a liberating and transforming spirituality, academic discipline, justice and peace, and an appreciation of religious, gender, and cultural diversity, need to reflect critically and theologically on the impact of the intersections of race/ethnicity, gender, sexuality and class on issues of identity, power, citizenship, etc., both within the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and contemporary realities in the church and community and our ethical commitments to responsibly engage such issues. This course explores the documents (including narratives, laws, wise sayings, myths, songs, and poetry), preserved in the Jewish Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and Christian Old Testament, used to construct ancient Israel’s religious, ethnic and national identity. We will examine the social, historical, and cultural contexts within which the canon developed, including their African, Mesopotamian, and Syria-‐ Palestinian milieu. This course fulfills the Core Requirement for the M.Div. and M.A. degrees. There is no prerequisite for this course. SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS POLICY In order to obtain credit for a course, students must attend at least 85 percent of the contact hours for a particular course. A 16-‐week, 1 day a week course requires that a student miss no more than 15 percent or 2.4 numbers of classes. A student can be dropped after missing three classes. Please note that the class schedule meets this minimum such that an unexcused absence of one session can severely hinder 1 ITC Syllabus Template
the student’s ability to meet the required hours and may consequently affect the student’s ability to make satisfactory attendance, which may affect the student’s satisfactory academic progress for financial aid. Please see the Mandatory Attendance Policy (July 2015) for further guidance. DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION POLICY The Office of Student Services provides services for qualified students with verified physical or mental disabilities in accordance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. (ADA). Services provided include, but are not limited to: readers, note takers, equipment loan, interpreters, adaptive computer software, large print copying, test proctoring, community referral, and advocacy. The mission of the Abilities office is “empowerment through education,” These services provide disabled students with equal access to education and an opportunity to fully participate in activities related to the academic pursuits. Students with disabilities must identify themselves in order to receive support from the Abilities office. All documentation related to the existence of a disability is treated as confidential information. ITC’s ACADEMIC INTEGRITY POLICY (ABBREVIATED) If student work shows plagiarism or cheating, the following procedures will be in place and cannot be reversed by the instructor (evidence of plagiarism/cheating that is reported to the provost, after notifying the department/area chair, is out of the hands of the instructor. All appeals must be made to the Provost office). The Board of Trustees of ITC has ruled, in the case of academic misconduct (plagiarism, cheating, and other acts of inappropriate behavior laid out in Student Handbook 4.2):
That all members of the ITC faculty notify the Provost, who shall notify the President, of all incidents of cheating by students and further that the President be authorized to take such action(s) that may be appropriate, including reprimand, suspension, and termination in line with the institution’s policy; and the student fails the class. (Plagiarism, cheating, and other acts of inappropriate behavior are laid out in Student Handbook 4.2.)
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES Upon completing IBSL 501 and IBSL 531, students must demonstrate a working knowledge of: 1) the basic history and literature of HB/NT as appropriate; 2) the impact of the era in which the literature was written and impact of other ancient societies on this literature; 3) major theoretical arguments that have emerged in the academic study of that canon; 4) and contemporary perspectives as evidence of the student’s commitment to academic discipline and scholarship.
COURSE OUTCOMES EVIDENCE OF PROGRAM AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
The course outcomes are evidence of the Master of Divinity and Master of Arts in Christian Education degree program outcomes in the following competencies: 2 ITC Syllabus Template
M.Div. SLO Competencies
M.Div. PLOs
MACE PLOs
Measured by (Indicate Specific Course Assignment)
Story Linking Use Storytelling/Linking Skills – students apply Biblical Interpretation, historical accounts, and/or ethical and philosophical Ideas to contemporary realities to address moral/social dilemmas.
PLO-‐1. Develop and express the basic tenets of faith, religion, and denominational traditions for ministerial vocation and leadership
Define and describe biblical, theological, philosophical, historical, sociocultural, and psychological tenets that under-‐gird the socio-‐ cultural experiences of the African diaspora as they relate to the concrete practices of teaching learning.
Embedded Assignment
Critical Thinking
PLO-‐2. Execute sermons, liturgies, Use Thinking Skills – programs, and students decode performances that Significance, clarify demonstrate their Meaning (Interpret); religion, faith, and Examine Ideas, Detect, commitment to live Analyze Arguments out a liberating and (Analyze); Assess Claims, or transforming Arguments (Evaluate). spirituality
Employ oral and ocular worldviews to illustrate, compare, contrast, and critique the various theories supporting core courses.
Embedded Assignment
Intrapersonal
PLO-‐3. Construct worship services, Demonstrate Intrapersonal educational sessions, Skills -‐ Self-‐articulation; forums in the Self-‐examination; and/or community, church, Self-‐correction and academy to evidence their leadership and administrative skills
Demonstrate the capacity to implement teaching-‐ learning practices that reflect denominational traditions, religious heritages, and a liberating and transforming spirituality.
Community
Research, design and administer curriculums that relate oral and ocular worldviews as operative in contemporary communities of the African Diaspora
Demonstrate Community Building Skills -‐ Design; Organize; Plan; Advocate; Use Collaborate Strategies (in the Church and the Academy Communities)
PLO-‐4. Contribute to the advancement of research and creative projects that substantiate the contribution, role, and function of the African and African American experience
3 ITC Syllabus Template
GRADING POLICY – EVALUATION AND GRADING SYSTEM
Course Evaluation Assignment Rubrics The evaluation criteria applied to all course requirements for this course are listed in the assignment rubrics on the Moodle page. The intent of rubrics is to enable you to evaluate your own work on the class assignments, cluster work, and/or individual assignments by the same standards as the course facilitator. Completing the assignment is not evidence of excellent (A) work. The following criteria are assigned to all components of this course and, (specific) rubric for each assignment.
Course Evaluation Scale (points or percent) of Assignment Essay Assignment 1: Documentary Hypothesis – 20 points (see rubric on Moodle) Group Assignment: – 20 points (see rubric on Moodle) Field Assignment: Social World of the Hebrew Bible – 30 points (see rubric on Moodle) Embedded Assignment: Biblical Theology – 30 points (see rubric on Moodle) NOTE: All written work is to be typed, double-‐spaced, with page numbers. An average typed page is roughly 300-‐350 words. While dialogue with other students will be an important element of this class, all written work is to be in your own words, without plagiarism. Please consult the ITC catalogue to reference school policies. All direct quotes and paraphrasing must be cited!!! Please follow the Kate L. Turabian Manual for Writers. Refer to the ITC catalogue for a detailed description of the grading scale. The Associate Vice President of Academic Services will immediately address all cases of cheating. Therefore “A” work is: A very clear, insightful assignment that includes: • Some original thinking • An excellent grasp of the subject matter • Clear evidence of personal engagement with course material and critical thinking • Goes beyond the minimum • Thorough and timely preparation of the assignment • Willingness to be changed by new insights and discoveries • Correct spelling and grammar ITC Grading Scale Grade Quality Numerical Points Value A 4.0 96-‐100 A-‐ 3.7 90-‐95 4 ITC Syllabus Template
B+ 3.3 87-‐89 B 3.0 83-‐86 B-‐ 2.7 80-‐82 C+ 2.3 77-‐79 C 2.0 73-‐76 C-‐ 1.7 70-‐72 D+ 1.3 67-‐69 D 1.0 63-‐66 F 0.0 60-‐62 REQUIRED TEXTS, MEDIA, OR FIELD EXPERIENCES
Attridge, Harold, et al. HarperCollins Study Bible: Fully Revised and Updated, Student Edition. San Francisco: HarperSan Francisco, 2006. 9780060786847. (Attridge) Stanley, Christopher D. The Hebrew Bible: A Comparative Approach. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2009. 9780800663476 (HB) Page, Hugh, Randall C. Bailey, et al., eds. The Africana Bible: Reading Israel’s Scriptures from Africa and the African Diaspora. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010. 0800621255 (AB) Felder, Cain Hope, ed. Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991. 9780800625016 RECOMMENDED TEXTS, MEDIA, OR FIELD EXPERIENCES Crenshaw, Kimberlé. ““Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43 no. 6 (July 1991):1241-‐1299. (ATLA) Newsom, Carol, Sharon Ringe, and Jacqueline Lapsley, eds. Women’s Bible Commentary, 3rd ed., revised & updated. Louisville: Westminister John Knox, 2011. The following are the required articles for this class, and are on reserve at the Robert W. Woodruff Library or can be retrieved on the ATLAReligion Database (ATLA). Anderson, Cheryl B. “Reflections in an Interethnic/racial Era on Interethnic/racial Marriage in Ezra.” In They Were All Together in One Place? Toward Minority Biblical Criticism. Society of Biblical Studies Semeia Studies, eds. Randall Bailey, Tat-‐Siong Benny Liew, and Fernando Segovia. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009, 47-‐64. (LR) Ateek, Naim. “A Palestinian Perspective: Biblical Perspectives of the Land.” In Voices from the Margin: Interpreting the Bible in the Third World, ed. R. S. Sugirtharajah. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis, 2004, 267-‐276. (LR)
5 ITC Syllabus Template
Bailey, Randall C. “Beyond Identification: The Use of Africans in Old Testament Poetry and Narratives.” In Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation, ed. Cain Hope Felder. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 165-‐84. (1) ________. “They’re Nothing but Incestuous Bastards: The Polemical Use of Sex and Sexuality in Hebrew Canon Narratives.” In Reading from this Place: Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in the United States. Vol. 1, eds. Fernando F. Segovia, and Mary Ann Tolbert. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995, 121-‐ 138. (2; LR) Copher, Charles B. “Black Presence in the Bible.” In Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation, ed. Cain Hope Felder. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 146-‐164 (LR) Felder, Cain Hope. “Race, Racism, and the Biblical Narratives.” In Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation, ed. Cain Hope Felder. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 127-‐145. (LR) Gafney, Wilda. “Translation Matters: A Fem/Womanist Exploration of Translation Theory and Practice for Proclamation in Worship,” SBL Forum n.p. [cited March 2006]. Online http://www.sbl-‐ site.org/publications/article.aspx?ArticleId=509. Garcia-‐Treto, Francisco. “Exile in the Hebrew Bible: A Postcolonial Look from Cuban Diaspora.” In They Were All Together in One Place? Toward Minority Biblical Criticism. Semeia Studies 57, eds. Randall C. Bailey, Tat-‐siong Benny Liew, and Fernando F. Segovia. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2009, 65-‐ 78. (LR) Hoyt, Jr., Thomas. “Interpreting Biblical Scholarship for the Black Church Tradition.” In Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation, ed. Cain Hope Felder. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 17-‐39. Lorde, Audre. “Age, Race, Class and Sex: Women Redefining Difference.” Paper delivered at the Copeland Colloquium, Amherst College, April 1980. (Pdf provided) Stone, Ken. “Lovers and Raisin Cakes: Food, Sex, and Divine Insecurity in Hosea.” In Queer Commentary and the Hebrew Bible, ed. Ken Stone. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001, 116-‐139. (LR) Weems, Renita. “Reading Her Way through the Struggle: African American Women and the Bible.” In Stony the Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation, ed. Cain Hope Felder. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 57-‐80. ________. “Introduction” and “‘You Have the Forehead of a Whore’: The Rhetoric of a Metaphor.” In Battered Love: Marriage, Sex, and Violence in the Hebrew Prophets. (Overtures to Biblical Theology). Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1995, 1-‐34. Yee, Gale. “The Two Sisters in Ezekiel: They Played the Whore in Egypt.” In Poor Banished Children of Eve: Women as Evil in the Hebrew Bible. Minneapolis: Augsburg Press, 2003, 111-‐134. (LR) *Read all corresponding biblical texts to assigned course readings. 6 ITC Syllabus Template
CLASS SESSION FORMAT The course format for delivery of instruction will consist of direct instruction (primarily lectures), inquiry-‐based learning that encourages problem solving and critical thinking, and cooperative learning, where students will work in small groups. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS – DESCRIPTION AND INSTRUCTIONS Embedded Measure (Assignment) – Students are required to upload this assignment into their eFolio. In demonstration of this outcome, students will write a six-‐page paper worth 30 points in which they describe the differences and similarities in the use of a biblical concept within portions of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament or New Testament, depending on the testament. Students will discuss how the concept is impacted by matters of identity (gender and sexuality, class, age, physical (dis)ability, etc.). Students will explain how these different uses of the concept reflect the cultures that impact the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and/or New Testament. Students will explore how these different uses of the biblical concept interact with the ways in which their individual denomination/ecclesiastical affiliations understand the same concept. Embedded Assignment A: Students working in groups assigned at the beginning of the semester will collaborate to prepare and deliver an oral presentation on ONE concept of “marriage” in various sections of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament canon. Students will pay particular attention to how marriage is impacted by matters of identity (gender and sexuality, class, age, physical (dis)ability, etc.). Describe how this use of the concept reflects the cultural background of the specific portion of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. Explore how this use of the concept interacts with the ways in which your denomination/ecclesiastical affiliation understands the same concept. Include at least two examples from two different divisions of the HB/OT to support your presentation. A one-‐page written recap of the presentation must be prepared and distributed at the time of the presentation, as well as uploaded to Moodle. Embedded Assignment A is worth 20 points. This assignment is due Tuesday, October 6, 2015. Embedded Assignment B: Students will write a six-‐page paper in which they will trace the variations in the description of a given concept throughout the Hebrew Bible canon. The concept for AY 2015-‐16 is slavery. Students will pay particular attention to how slavery is impacted by matters of identity (gender and sexuality, class, age, physical (dis)ability, etc.). Students will describe how these different uses of the concept reflect the cultures behind the Hebrew Bible. Each seminarian will explore how these different uses interact with the ways in which her or his denomination/ecclesiastical affiliation understands the same concept. Students will include examples from the Torah/Pentateuch, prophets, poetry and writings to support their presentations. Embedded Assignment B is worth 30 points and will be evaluated as part of the overall class grade. The assignment will also be evaluated separately using the standard embedded assignment rubric. Regardless of your overall grade in this class, you must demonstrate 80% proficiency on this assignment in the areas of Ocularity, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking and Information Literacy. This assignment is to be placed in a student's electronic folio (e-‐folio) as evidence of successful completion of the IBSL 501 ALO for the Department of Biblical Studies and Languages or M.A.C.E. PLO. If you score less than 80% on this assignment, you must redo it. The first draft is due Tuesday, November 3; the final assignment is due Finals Week Tuesday, December 1, 2015. 7 ITC Syllabus Template
Additional Assignments The Documentary Hypothesis Paper (20 points) Students will write a six-‐page paper with thesis statement and two or three supporting arguments and counter-‐arguments defending the impact of the Documentary Hypothesis on the interpretation of a Hebrew Bible passage. Full instruction for this assignment will be available on Moodle. This essay will be evaluated based on a rubric that will be available on Moodle. This assignment is due Tuesday, September 15. Field Assignment: Social World of the Hebrew Bible (30 points) Student will write a 3-‐4 page paper in response to a list of questions on the impact of the social world of the Hebrew Bible based on a visit to the Michael G. Carlos Museum collection on ancient Egypt, Nubia, and the Near East. The visit is worth 15 points and the paper is worth 15 points. This assignment is due Tuesday, November 17.
8 ITC Syllabus Template
COURSE WEEKLY SCHEDULE
Week
Date
Topic
8/18
Introduction: Theological Education and the Formation of the Bible
Hoyt, 17-‐39; Recommended: Stanley, Chs. 15 & 16
8/25
What is the Bible?
Stanley, Chs. 1-‐4; Attridge, “Introduction,” “To the Reader,” “Names and Order of Books,” “Timeline”; Weems (1)
9/1
Methods for Biblical Criticism
Stanley, Chs. 5, 17; Attridge, “Critical Study of the Old Testament”; Genesis (AB); Bailey (1); Weems (2)
9/8
The Exodus Narrative
Stanley, Chs. 6, 18; Exodus (AB); Crenshaw, Felder; Gafney; Recommended: Lorde
9/15
The Deuteronomistic Narratives
Stanley, Chs. 19-‐20; Ateek; Documentary Hypothesis Bailey (2); Ross; Joshua, Essay Paper Due Judges, 1 & 2 Samuel, 1 & 2 Kings (AB)
9/22
Postexilic Narratives
Stanley, Ch. 21; Ezra-‐ Nehemiah, Ruth, Esther, 1 & 2 Chronicles, 1 & 2 Maccabees; Anderson; Treto-‐Garcia
1
2
3
4
5
6
Readings
Assignment
9/29 7
The Laws of Torah
Chs. 22-‐24; Leviticus and Numbers (AB)
ITC Syllabus Template
COURSE WEEKLY SCHEDULE (cont’d)
Week
Date
Topic
10/6
The Prophetic Tradition
Stanley, Ch. 31; Kirk-‐Duggan, Group Presentation on Bridgeman; Copher Marriage (PLO 1, 2)
10/13
Early Pre-‐Exilic Prophets
Stanley, Ch. 32; Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Joel, and Amos (AB); Stone; Yee
10/20
Late Pre-‐Exilic Prophets
Stanley, Ch. 33; Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, and Habakkuk (AB)
8
9
10
Readings
Assignment
10/27
Michael G. Carlos Museum Visit
Stanley, Chs. 25-‐28
11/3
Exilic and Postexilic Prophets
Stanley, Ch. 34-‐35; Draft Embedded Zephaniah, Haggai, Assignment Paper Due Zechariah, and Malachi (AB)
11/10
Rise of Apocalyptic
Stanley, Ch. 36; Daniel (AB)
Way of Wisdom
Stanley, Chs. 13, 30, 37; Psalms, Job, Proverbs (AB)
Carlos Museum Paper Due
11
12
13
11/17 14
11/24
Other Paths to Wisdom
12/1
FINALS WEEK
15
16
Stanley, Ch. 38; Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations (AB)
Final Embedded Assignment Paper Due (PLO 1, 2)
ITC Syllabus Template
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
ITC Hours Statement The expectation for this course is that you will spend 2 hours and 40 minutes per week in class and you will spend up to eight (8) hours per week studying, reading, and completing assignments for this course. Woodruff Library and Theology Librarian A liberative education doesn’t tell you what to think, nor does it provide a set of verbal indicts—we’ll teach you how to think. You'll learn how to gather information, analyze, and synthesize. Don't worry about the "gathering"... that's the easy part. We have peer support, information specialists, and a theology librarian to help you find the information you need. Woodruff Library provides access to scholarly books, journals, eBooks, and databases of full text articles from scholarly journals. To begin using these materials, visit the library web page http://www.auctr.edu Mr. Brad Ost, Theology Librarian is available to assist you at the AUC Woodruff Library campus, via chat on the library’s home page, or by emailing him at
[email protected]. You may contact the library at (404) 978-‐2067. If you attend classes online, please check your course management page.