Feasibility Report Automated Hose Cutter for NMG Aerospace
NMG Aerospace Contacts Brent Carver and Jason Ponimoi Project Mentor Professor Jerry Gintz Prepared by
TEAM 2, POLY INDUSTRIAL Project Lead: Lee Griffith Documentation: Riley Thompson CAD Modeling: Justin Schnepf Research: Dustin Brumbaugh Communication Lead: Edward Taylor Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Mesa, Arizona
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Poly Industrial has investigated and developed an automated design to replace the existing hose-cutting process in place at NMG Aerospace. The process of investigation has primarily been focused on the feasibility of implementing any automation-based solution. This has led to the proposed design being a “best case scenario,” in which the cost has been dropped as low as possible without sacrificing functionality. The Team, named Poly Industrial, consists of Team Leader Lee Griffith, CAD lead Justin Schnepf, Documentation lead Riley Thompson, Researcher Dustin Brumbaugh, and Communicator Edward Taylor. The project began with the base purpose of investigating the feasibility of NMG’s existing hose cutting process. The teams (of which there were three, with Poly Industrial being the second) were rightly guided towards automation by Professor Jerry Gintz of Arizona State University. The team then began researching any and all existing solutions in use already. The results of the research were that, in spite of the many different solutions, none were particularly applicable to NMG’s process. The team decided it would be best to develop a custom solution. The design pictured on the cover page is the team’s proposed solution. It features a small suite of sensors acting in tandem with a grand total of three stepper motors, all under the command of a Programmable Automation Controller and a separate Cell Controller. It uses information gathered by scanning the barcode of the Job Traveler and receiving data from NMG’s ERP system, Epicor, to automate the process of pulling, measuring, and cutting hose. The design removes the operator from most steps of the process, including the most tedious and repetitive. This improves operator utilization significantly, allowing the operator to walk away from the process. Further, the automation improves repeatability, accuracy, and part quality by removing the possibility for human error. There are also conceptual improvements listed to allow the design to handle hose loading and reloading, vision system-based quality control, increased production demands, and relocation of cut hose from the design to the pre-existing rack used at NMG. The given budget for the project was $10,000. After a significant amount of time and effort, Poly Industrial has managed to decrease the estimated cost of the design down to $10,533.10. Poly Industrial strongly recommends proceeding with the design, as the small overage of $500 is a small cost in comparison to the investment in integrating automation into NMG’s factory.
Contents 1. Introduction Needs Desired Features Constraints
1 2 2 2
2. Research and Ideation Benchmarking and Research Methods Decision Matrix
3 3 4
3. Solution Overview Components Control Schematic and Algorithm Failure Analysis Bill of Materials, and Budgetary Quote Future Integration Plans
5 5 6 8 9 10 11
4. Conclusion Recommendation
13 13
Appendices
14
A. Research Documents
15
B. Detailed Model Views
17
C. Bill of Materials
20
D. Full Technical Drawing Package
21
1. Introduction Team 2, unofficially named Poly Industrial, has been tasked with investigating the feasibility of an automated hose-cutting process tailored to NMG Aerospace's needs. With the formation of teams in late August of 2016, a deadline of December 2nd of the same year, and the supervision of Arizona State University's Professor Jerry Gintz, the members of Team 2 began work to research, design, and present a possible solution. With the added incentive that the best solution, assuming such solutions were feasible, would likely be built and implemented for NMG, each team poured their best efforts into the project. What follows hereafter is the results of Poly Industrial's (Team 2’s) efforts in investigating the feasibility of such a process. To begin with, The Team is comprised of five individuals. The Project Manager, chosen by vote, is Lee Griffith. Justin Schnepf was given responsibility over all CAD work. Dustin Brumbaugh took the position of lead researcher. Edward Taylor volunteered as a corporate liaison and communications lead, responsible for contacting any business entity or NMG source regardless of purpose. Finally, Riley Thompson was given the roles of Documentation and Presentation. The subject of the team’s investigation is an existing process in use at NMG Aerospace. The existing, entirely manual cutting process is used to cut “raw” (received in long bundles from the manufacturer) hose into specific lengths. These hose lengths are then integrated into emergency evacuation slide assemblies, to be used in the inflation process in the event of an emergency. However, while the existing cutting process is sufficient to NMG’s needs, there are areas where it might be improved by automation. The storage area for raw hose uses a large swath of floor space, the manual nature of the process limits repeatability and accuracy, and there is a small, yet potentially significant chance that an operator might miss a critical defect in a section of hose, among other shortcomings. As a result, NMG has tasked the teams with investigating the feasibility of improving these aspects of the process through automation. However, while these are the key goals, there are numerous other factors at play, including the information in the following sections.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 1
Needs To begin with, there are set requirements that the automated system must have. Failure to meet these requirements in a proposed design is tantamount to any such improvement being infeasible. Further, a feasible design would not only implement these requirements, but do so within budget. ● The process must accommodate hose lengths up to 198”, with a maximum width of 1.25”. ● Hose length measurement must be highly accurate, to within a tolerance of +/- 0.125”. ● The measured length will be compared to a target length, information which will be automatically acquired from a standard Job Traveler document. ● The process will minimize scrap material in a way that meets or exceeds existing methodology. ● The process must have appropriate safeguards to prevent operator injury, including but not limited to an Emergency Stop button and safety guards around the cutting device. Desired Features Poly Industrial’s proposed solution will be evaluated heavily based on the above needs, but beyond them are a series of features to be implemented if possible. On Poly Industrial’s side, the goal is to investigate the possibility of adding these features and explaining whether or not it is possible to deliver them within budget, but of the three teams, favor may be given to the team which can deliver the most of these. These features include: ● Output rate, with preference to high outputs and a secondary constraint of 100+ cuts in 8 hours. ● Computer Inspection used, to identify flaws in the hose material that foretell catastrophic failure. ● Automatic selection of correct hose diameter would be a valuable part of the process, in that it could eliminate large opportunities for operator error. This implies an improved storage system as well. ● Built-in transportation of the cut hose lengths from the cutting process to the next stage of the process. Constraints Regardless of which features and needs are implemented, there are a series of constraints to be applied here. In addition to the minor constraint of 100 cuts per day listed above, the process has to reach a series of performance and maintenance benchmarks, such as: ● Design will require service in an interval of no less than 6 months, with 75% of service-needing parts being available off the shelf, as opposed to requiring custom manufacturing. ● If Automatic Selection is implemented, at least three hose sizes must be accommodated. ○ Implied storage solution must also carry minimum 300 feet of hose for selection. ○ Hose arrives from manufacturer in random lengths from approximately 25 feet to 100 feet. ● Design will produce a cut quality that meets or exceeds that of the current process. ● With exception to the hose measurement track (if not replaced), the process will take up no more than 4' by 4' of floor space. ● The anticipated implementation budget of the recommended set of improvements will not exceed $10,000 without explicit approval from representatives of NMG Aerospace.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 2
2. Research and Ideation As with any project, the team began by seeking out context; more specifically, by identifying the details of the project and investigating existing solutions. The most fluid portion of this process was detailing the client's expectations. While NMG had taken the time to explain their interests with the project, each team was advised that the presented criteria would be well-considered as “stretch goals,” rather than the minimum requirements. As a result, determining what was most critical to NMG became a month-long task. At this time, Poly Industrial believes it has a firm grasp on the criteria by which the teams will be judged and the constraints placed upon the teams. The research poured into the project was a similarly lengthy task. Due to the limited time frame of the project, research was forced to begin before the details of the project were fully understood. That in mind, research continued even after the design phase began, resulting in a design with multiple iterations and continuous improvements. Benchmarking and Research Methods Poly Industrial began the research phase of the project by benchmarking existing solutions. While there was a selection of products available from all manner of vendor, none were deemed adequate for the application in question. As a result, PI redefined the goal of the research; rather than seeking out pre-existing solutions, the team would explore each different component of the process.
Figure 2-1: Image of the existing design. Hose enters cutter assembly (bottom left) and is fed through until reaching the designated length marking (white tape).
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 3
The benchmarking process also included analysis of the current process employed at NMG. More specifically, the existing process was used as a baseline against which all considered alterations were compared. Further, upon inspection during a tour of NMG's facility, two key limiting aspects to the process were identified; the first was that the existing storage setup for raw hose was disorganized, leading to low traceability, which itself could lead to much larger recalls in the event of a hose failure in the future. The second was that the process, while sufficient in production speed, was very operator-intensive; an operator could not at any time multitask, and was required for every stage of the process. While other limitations of the process were clearly identified, these two in particular caught Poly Industrial's attention. In the course of PI's research, aspects considered include: Hose Inspection Systems, which would ensure each hose length is without flaw; Control Systems, to automate the process and remove the operator partially or entirely from this section of the overall process; Hose Storage methods, for the purpose of freeing floor space and improving traceability drastically; And methods with which to automate the hose-cutter itself, among other aspects of the process. The alternatives considered for each stage of the process are documented in Appendix B, Item 3 - The Team’s Research Map. These alternatives were considered and decided upon through a pair of decision matrices, seen below in Table 2-1. Additional details are available in the Appendices. Decision Matrix
Table 2-2: Weighted Decision Matrix
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 4
3. Solution Overview Poly Industrial has worked over the past three months to develop a comprehensive and effective solution, including a suite of potential add-ons and future improvements for this already-impressive solution. The process has been difficult and taxing at times, but the team was determined to provide the best design possible. Work began with research, but by the time of the Design Review presentations, PI was able to bring a unique solution to the table, complete with CAD Models and preliminary Bill of Materials. Following the presentations, the team (and in particular, Justin Schnepf, the primary CAD designer) reworked and improved the design to match the significant feedback received. The proposed design is the result of PI's piecewise research; that is to say, the separate aspects of the process were investigated independently of each other, then combined into a single coherent design. Following feedback from NMG, the team refined the design significantly, compacting it and ensuring that a Vision System could feasibly and easily be integrated. The various aspects to the process include: ● One free-spinning wheel, meant to hold the individual roll of hose being cut. ● A combination of measurement rollers and sensors to track the hose material being pulled through the process. ● A track constructed using stepper motors and rubber-based contact surface to pull the hose material in a no-slip condition to the cutter. ● The Cutter Assembly itself, which uses a simple piston-blade assembly and aligning orifice to cut the hose lengths. ● A Collection Zone, here modeled as simply a table with a ramp. ● A handheld barcode scanner, which the Operator uses to tell the operating system to pull Job Traveler information from the Epicor system that runs the NMG facility. ● Manual Controls, in the event of an error or system failure. ● Clear Encasement. Encasement itself is for operator safety, where the transparency allows for quick identification of problems without exposing the operator to unnecessary risk. ● A Programmable Automation Controller, to process system inputs and control system outputs.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 5
Components
The different components of the design can be divided into four categories - Control Components, Discrete Input Components, Analog Input/Output (I/O) Components, and Physical Components. The Control Components start with the Epicor ERP System, which interfaces with a Cell Controller. The main job of the Cell Controller is to act as an information tracking nexus for the entire system. It collects information from Epicor and from the Barcode Scanner in the above image (Callout 2), passes instructions to the PAC, and collects responses from the PAC to check certain conditions. Such conditions might be the position of the hose, the indication that a cut has been made, and whether or not there is raw hose in the system. Meanwhile, the role of the PAC is to control the Output functions of the Analog I/O Components, with instructions made conditional based on information from the Cell Controller, the Discrete Input components, and the Input functions of the Analog I/O. Finally, a Human-Machine Interface and a set of basic controls (Callouts 10 and 9 respectively) are included to allow for manual control, including calibration, troubleshooting, and emergency action. The Physical Components of the system provide basic functionality. Without these components, the system would be incapable of operating independent of an operator. The first such component is the rotating wheel (Callout 1), the job of which is to hold a reel of raw hose as it is pulled into the system. It is free-spinning, allowing the drive system inside to provide the force to spin and feed more hose. The next physical component is the cutter blade and aligning orifice (Part of Callout 6; the other part, a pneumatic piston, is an Analog I/O). The hose is fed through the orifice and cut by the blade. Following that, the hose slides down a short ramp (Callout 7) and onto the angled table (Callout 8). Both the ramp
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 6
and the table are considered physical components, in that the functionality they provide is storage for hoses already cut. Also, please note that the angled table is one of many collection methods considered by Poly Industrial, and was chosen purely for simplicity. Other options will be discussed by the “Future Integration” section. The Discrete Input Devices are information-gathering tools. The first such tools are a small suite of proximity sensors (Callout 3). Their function is simple - detect whether or not hose has entered the system. This is followed by a pair of rollers through which the hose is fed (Callout 4). They use a spring to maintain tension as hose is fed through them, then report their position to the PAC as a numeric value, which is compared against a value from the Cell Controller; this process checks to ensure the diameter of the hose inserted is correct according to the Job Traveler’s information (which was pulled by the Cell Controller from Epicor after a barcode check). This serves as the first measurement system of two, where the second is the drive track. The last Discrete Input component is the proximity sensor in the cutter assembly (Callout 6), which ensures that there is hose in the cutter assembly before cutting. It is also placed on the outside of the cutter assembly (to the right, in the above image) to allow the added functionality of detecting when the first uncut section of a raw hose length passes through. This information can then be used to remove the frayed edge of the raw hose, as a separate cut from the normal process. Finally, the most critical components for the design are the Analog I/O Components. While they do report information back to the PAC, their primary job is actuating the system. Their input systems tend to be redundancies which, while important to ensure accuracy, pale in comparison to providing the primary function of the entire system: pulling and cutting hose. The first Analog I/O component, then, is the Drive Track (Callout 5). It is more appropriate to think of this component as a sub-assembly, due to the quantity of parts involved in providing the singular function of moving the hose material. Regardless, the key parts of the system start with the two opposing rubber tracks (or another high-friction material), which are driven by a pair of encoded stepper motors. The motors rotate to pull the hose, while simultaneously reporting their positions to track the length of hose pulled. The position of the track is vertically adjusted by a motor-screw assembly, which uses a spring potentiometer to report position and thereby match the diameter of the hose. The second Analog I/O Component is much simpler, being a pneumatic cylinder with in-built position sensing. The input is its position, the output is the command to extend (and make a cut) or retract. As simple as this component is in comparison, without it or an alternative method, cutting hose is impossible. As such, it may be the most crucial component of the entire design.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 7
Control Schematic and Algorithm
Figure 3-3: Control Schematic for Proposed Solution The above Schematic shows the flow of information in the solution proposed by Poly Industrial. The process begins with the scanning of the Barcode on a standard Job Traveler. The barcode information is sent to the Cell Controller, which then sends it to Epicor as a request for the specifics of the job. Epicor responds with the length of each cut of hose, as well as its diameter, the number of cuts to be made, and any other critical information. The Cell Controller passes cut length and diameter to the PAC; note that it does not pass the number of cuts to be made, as the Cell Controller is the component which will track that, not the PAC. The PAC then instructs the Output Components accordingly, using information from the Input Components to run through its programming. It then reports to the Cell Controller when it has made a cut, encountered an error, or run out of material. The Cell Controller responds appropriately - for instance, in the event it is out of material, it will command the PAC to change which signal light on top of the machine is lit (or cause a light to flash repeatedly) to inform the nearby Operator. The schematic does not include the manual controls or input from the Human-Machine Interface, as such input requires that this process be halted. These controls would interface directly with the PAC, and create the simple link:
Figure 3-4: Manual Control Schematic
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 8
Step
Description
Operator?
1
Scan Job Traveler
Yes
2
Obtain Details from Epicor
3
Load and Feed Hose, press button to begin
4
Drive Belts move Hose to Zero Point
5
Cut End to Remove Frayed Edge
6
Measure Length, make first cut
7
Repeat until Job Complete or Out of Stock
8
Eject Remaining Hose and Load Next Reel
Yes
Yes
Table 3-5: Solution Process Algorithm The above Table 3-5 details the basic steps taken to cut lengths of hose according to any given Job Traveler. Note that the Operator is only involved at three of the eight steps, and that those steps have nearly zero room for failure. Further, this Algorithm is for a system without any sensor technology beyond the minimum required to move the hose into position; for an Algorithm that includes input from visual sensor technology, automatic selection, and automatic feeding, see section 3’s Future Integration.For the existing design, the Operator's perspective is as follows in Table 3-6. The remaining tasks are handled by the PAC and associated Cell Controller. Step
Description
1
Scan Job Traveler
2
Load and Feed Hose to Prime the System
3
Flow to other sections of Hose Production
4
Repeat Process and Relocate Hose Cuts as Necessary Table 3-6: Operator-Only Procedure
Failure Analysis For this project we created a PFMEA report in order to assist in determining potential failure points of our design. Furthermore this was done in order to objectively assess the severity of the most likely failure modes. Failures were considered for each of the system’s independent functions. We determined that the most detrimental failure cause would be a miscalibrated string potentiometer in conjunction with an incorrect hose selection by the operator.. This event could potentially allow the operator to insert the incorrect diameter hose without proper detection. While this would require a compounded error on the operator's part, it would also be necessary for that to occur at the time the sensor was brought out of calibration. This is due to the fact that a miscalibration during a prior operation with the correct diameter hose would have resulted in an error prompt to the operator.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 9
Overall we found that the severity of most failures would be minimal, resulting in a loss of operating time or materials. This is because we designed the system prioritizing production of only parts that meet the required specifications. Due to the nature of NMG’s business, we could not allow for a product that would inhibit the safe operation of their evacuation slides. This is why we have taken precautions to implement redundancies throughout the system. It is worth noting that there was one scenario that would allow for a product of incorrect dimensions to be produced. If the part information was not correctly assigned to the job traveler, then our system would have no inherent way of recognizing this error; detection would be reliant on the operator’s recognition of any incongruencies with the job at hand. However we feel that this is problem would no longer within the scope of this project. Through the PFMEA we were able to assure that, the system would operate within NMG’s requirements and no individual failure would allow for a product of incorrect dimensions to be produced. Redundant measurements throughout would still allow for manual operation of the system in the event of some individual system component failure. This would allow for reduction of production downtime while the system is in need of repair. We have take a multitude of precautions to ensure that any components failures would affect NMG Aerospace as minimally as possible. Bill of Materials, and Budgetary Quote
Figure 3-8: Bill of Materials for project, shrunken to add in to document. Full BOM is available in Appendix. Note the final cost of $10,533.10.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 10
The design in question was initially created to solve every imaginable problem, then pulled back to meet NMG’s budget. The most expensive components, however, remain the most important. Five hundred dollars for the incredibly important stepper motors, another five hundred for the programmable automation controller, and a thousand dollars for a human-machine interface; these are among the most expensive components, yet without them the system could not provide a function. The challenge was to minimize cost without sacrificing quality, and Poly Industrial has succeeded. One of the most critical points to understand about the contents of the Bill of Materials is that the prices are contingent on NMG purchasing from ASU. This is due to the educational discount on many of these parts which has been acquired and applied by Arizona State University. The price without the educational discount is estimated at $13,000. The price with the educational discount is estimated at $10,533.10. While this cost is slightly over budget, Poly Industrial worked hard to minimize it without any sacrifice to quality. As such, it is the lowest quote that can possibly be given for the design. That in mind, there is a key question to be answered: is this project feasible? The answer is yes, for a mere $533.10 more than the budget. Future Integration Plans There are a large number of potential features and add-ons that could be integrated with the design. Due to the wide-ranging capabilities of the PAC, there are few industry tools which could not be utilized. Some potential future installations and changes are listed below. Please note, these are mainly conceptual in nature, and this is not by any means an exhaustive list of all possibilities; merely a few reasonable possibilities in the future. 1. Multiple Devices - to accommodate higher production demands, multiple designs can be built and run in parallel. The Cell Controller necessary for the first iteration would be capable of handling all further iterations, but the PAC, Discrete Input Components, Analog I/O Components, and Physical Components would need to be recreated. 2. Automated Carousel - there are numerous free-standing Carousels available for a wide range of applications. Purchasing an automated Carousel and integrating it with the PAC’s programming would allow for automatic selection of hose, as well as improved traceability through the tracking of lot numbers for hose. Further, it would be possible with further design work to develop a way to automatically pull hose from the carousel to the cutting process, removing an operator (and therefore human error) from the system entirely. 3. Cut Hose Conveyor - as the proposed design stands, the newly-cut hose is deposited on a table. However, it is not infeasible to think that conveyor technology would be applicable for relocating cut hose onto the rack where it is placed for the next step of production. Further investigation would be required to implement this; a major challenge would be knowing precisely when to stop the conveyor to keep the hose on the rack, as opposed to falling off one side and onto the floor. 4. Vision - the most requested feature by NMG, inspection of the hose by a Vision System would have a profound impact on quality control. While it has been stated that the flaws and defects the
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 11
system would look for are already extremely rare, the system would work tirelessly to detect them where an Operator might become lazy or complacent. It is also among the most expensive options, and has thus been relegated to an option in the future. In the hypothetical scenario in which all of these improvements are implemented (meaning, three separate production devices, each with a Carousel with feeding mechanism, Conveyor, and Vision System) the Control Algorithm would be as follows. For purposes of Comparison, the old process (Table 3-5) has been placed next to it.
Standard Process Control Algorithm
Control Algorithm with Future Improvements.
Step Description
Op Description
Op
1
Scan Job Traveler
Ye Scan Job Traveler and press button to begin Yes s
2
Obtain Details from Epicor
3
Load and Feed Hose, press button to begin Ye Rotate Carousel to correct Hose diameter s
4
Drive Belts move Hose to Zero Point
Feed Hose into system
5
Cut End to Remove Frayed Edge
Drive Belts move Hose to Zero Point
6
Measure Length, make first cut
Cut End to Remove Frayed Edge
7
Repeat until Job Complete or Out of Stock
Measure Length, make first cut
8
Eject Remaining Hose and Load Next Reel Ye Convey Cut Length to Rack s
9
Move hose from collection zone to rack
Obtain Details from Epicor
Ye Repeat until Job Complete or Out of Stock s
10 Eject Remaining Hose and Load Next Reel Table 3-7: Standard Process Control Algorithm (left) compared to Control Algorithm taking into account all listed future improvement concepts (right). Note that the Control Algorithm after implementing the listed concepts contains one more control step, but removes three of the four operator steps. The presence of the Carousel and Conveyor components can eliminate much of the tedium of the process, allowing the operator to be better utilized elsewhere. The cost-effectiveness of these improvements is something that will require in-depth investigation, with information that NMG alone possesses, such as employee wages and profit from the existing process.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 12
4. Conclusion To return to the beginning, the purpose of the project was to investigate the feasibility of improving a set of aspects of an existing hose-cutting process. Poly Industrial has spent the last three months doing precisely that, investigating every possible solution. Of the myriad solutions already in use around the world, none of them fit the constraints, criteria, and needs of NMG to the effect that a customized solution can. Fortunately, one such customized solution exists. Poly Industrial’s proposed solution is effective in the purpose of improving the interrelated aspects of accuracy, repeatability, and quality. It is especially useful in improving operator utilization by minimizing the operator’s involvement, allowing them to use their time on other, less tedious efforts. The design is also highly adaptable, with possible additions including solutions to improve output, ensure perfect quality, or even remove the operator entirely. The solution has an estimated cost of $10,533.10 when ordered as a project developed by the ASU students of a future Capstone project. While this is over budget by 5.331%, Poly Industrial strongly believes that the cost is more than justified; NMG will be receiving a highly-customized solution that will vastly improve their existing process and open the door to much more significant and valuable automation integration and improvement projects. Recommendation Poly Industrial recommends proceeding with the project with next year’s group of Capstone students. While the development process may incur other costs not considered, Arizona State University is likely to provide some quantity of funds to offset these expenses. Further, by utilizing the Capstone project to their benefit, NMG will receive not only the work of the students but the assurances of expert professors who will be overseeing the project all throughout the associated school year. That in mind, the $10,533.10 quote is for a significantly reduced model. There are a large number of ways to improve upon the design, but doing so requires a raised budget. As such, another recommendation would be to review the budget given if at all possible. Poly Industrial has been informed that, after the price of $10,000, the cost-to-benefit ratio of the project drops off sharply. If this is the case, then the recommendation is moot - no such review should be done. If not, however, it is highly recommended that the budget be reviewed, as a higher budget will invariably lead not only to a better machine but also to a stronger foothold for automation; an investment into automating larger processes within NMG. Regardless of budgetary review, Poly Industrial strongly recommends proceeding to implementation.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 13
Appendices A. B. C. D.
Research Documents Detailed Model Views Bill of Materials Full Technical Drawing Package
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 14
A. Research Documents
Table 2-1: Unweighted Decision Matrix
Table 2-2: Weighted Decision Matrix
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 15
Figure B-3: Research Map.
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 16
B. Detailed Model Views
Figure 3-1: Angled view of proposed solution
Figure 3-2: Front View of proposed solution
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 17
Figures C-1 and C-2: Drive Track Model and Exploded View of Drive Track Model
Figure C-3: Model of Length and Diameter Measurement Rollers
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 18
Figure C-3: Up-close view of proposed solution model
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 19
C. Bill of Materials
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 20
D. Full Technical Drawing Package
Revision 110 Dec 4th 2016
Feasibility Report - Page 21
8
7
6
4
5
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
3
2
1
REVISIONS DESCRIPTION INITIAL CONCEPT SHOWN IN DESIGN REVIEW (NOT SHOWN IN THIS PACKET) REVISED BASE ON FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM CLIENT
REV. A B
DATE
APPROVED
10/152016 12/3/2016
D
D
B
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
COMPLETE SYSTEM
.5
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
DRAWN
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
8
7
6
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
DWG. NO.
Automated Hose Cutting System - Complete SHEET 1 CAD FILE: SCALE1:16
A
2
1
REV.
B
OF
3
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
124.197
41.317 C
C
16.000 8.416
B
B
59.712 30.644
35.628
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
5
SIZE
A
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Automated Hose Cutting System - Complete
1:32
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
2
REV.
B
OF
3
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
Main Components
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
ITEM NO. D
C
2
6
1
1
3
7
PART NUMBER
QTY.
1
Hose Reel
1
2
Drive System
1
3
Pneumatic Piston
1
4
Cutter Assembly
1
5
Outfeed Table
1
6
Structural Frame Assy.
1
7
Encoder Assy.
1
8
Control Equiptment
1
9
Control Station Assembly
1
4
D
C
5
B
B
9
8 Not Shown in this view (behind cover) A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
5
SIZE
A
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Automated Hose Cutting System - Complete
1:16
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
3
REV.
B
OF
3
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
CONTROL ASSEMBLY
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:4
SCALE
2
REV.
Control Assembly
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
8
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
ITEM PART NUMBER NO. 1 Control Assy. Shell
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
EXPLODED VIEW
D
2 3 4 5 6 7
C
10
9
2
3
6
8
5
8
4
9 10
1
QTY. 1
HMI 800fd_f-Pushbuttongreen 800fd_f-Pushbuttonred 800fd_p-Indicator Lamp-Amber 800fd_p-Indicator Lamp-green 800fd_p-Indicator Lamp-Red Emergency stop SYMBOL SCANNER HOLDER 11-66553 Symbol LS 2208 BARCODE SCANNER
1
D
1 1 1 1 1
C
1 1 1
7
B
B
1
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Control Assembly B
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
2
OF
8
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
TOP
D
2.00 2.00
8.50
ISO
4.50
6.11 C
X5 TRUE R.43
3.71
C
TRUE R.31
5.00
24.00 16.00
67.98°
11.00
B
9.50 1.00
B
8.00 6.00
3.00 8.39 A
FRONT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
A
RIGHT SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:8
2
Control Shell
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
3
B
OF
8
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
.80
TOP 1.80
ISO
C
C
2.19 R.67 R.03
1.17
B
B
.91 FRONT
.87
RIGHT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:1
2
PUSHBUTTON (TYP) CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
4
B
OF
8
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP ISO 1.80 C
C
2.19 R.67 R.08 R1.57
B
B
FRONT
RIGHT .80
1.01 1.11 1.17
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
IND. LAMP (TYP)
1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
5
B
OF
8
8
7
6
4
5
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
3
2
1
1.69 .61
D
D
BOTTOM ISO
C
C
.31 1.72
1.92 2.31
FRONT
3.14
B
B
R.82
1.69
A
A
TOP
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
5
SIZE
A
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
EMERGENCY STOP
1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
6
B
OF
8
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
4.48
D
TOP
ISO
3.92
C
C
B
B
4.48
2.98
.47
1.22
.56 3.81 RIGHT
A
FRONT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
1.22
SIZE
A
5
4
3
A
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
SCANNER HOLDER
1:2
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
7
B
OF
8
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
ISO TOP
3.48
3.84
C
C
2.47 B
B
6.20
.95
A
A
FRONT
RIGHT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
BARCODE SCANNER B
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
8
OF
8
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
Cutter Assembly
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:4
SCALE
2
REV.
Cutting Assembly
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
6
8
6
7
5
4
ITEM NO.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
3
EXPLODED
2
1
PART NUMBER
QTY.
1
Housing
1
2
Blade
1
3
Pneumatic Piston
1
4
Fork Sensor (45lsp_50mm)
1
D
3 C
C
2
1 B
B
4
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Cutting Assembly B
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
2
OF
6
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
.25
D
2.50
1.85
TOP
2.10 2.65
.50
C
C
ISO
2.00
2.00 2.65 B
B
2.75 FRONT
RIGHT (HIDDEN LINES VISIBLE)
4.00
A
A
1.50 3.00 Use Only SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:2
2
HOUSING
CAD FILE:
REV.
SHEET
1
3
B
OF
6
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
1.25 TOP
.35
TRUE R.35
ISO
TRUE R.23
C
C
.250
B
.58
.28
2.28
B
210.00°
2.00
FRONT
RIGHT 18.43°
.75 A
A
2.50 SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:1
2
REV.
BLADE
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
4
B
OF
6
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
.35 X4
TRUE R1.15
D
.55 1.42
TOP .86
ISO
1.42
C
C
3.89
B
B
7.61
11.20
RIGHT
FRONT
TRUE R.25
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
PNEUMATIC PISTON B
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
5
OF
6
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
2.36 D
R.20 X2
2.76
.39
D
2.13
3.13
C
C
ISO
FRONT
.20
B
B
.394 LEFT
A
A
TOP
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
FORK SENSOR
1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
6
B
OF
6
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
DRIVE SYSTEM
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:4
SCALE
2
CAD FILE:
REV.
Drive System SHEET
1
1
B
OF
14
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
12.05 D
D
TOP
7.07
ISO
LEFT C
C
13.25
13.25
11.75
FRONT
6.80
B
B
BOTTOM
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Drive System
1:8
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
2
B
OF
14
8
7
6
5
4
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
3
2
1
7
EXPLODED
8
D
ITEM NO.
C
B
PART NUMBER
QTY.
1
Drive system Base
1
2
Flanged Drive Wheel
4
3
Linear Guide Bearing
2
4
Upper track component
1
5
Drive Belt Stepper Motor
2
6
Drive Belt
2
7
Pololu Stepper with 280mm LeadScrew
1
8
lead screw bracket
1
9
Lead Screw End Plate
1
10
Drive system rear guard
1
11
Drive System Front Guard
1
D
9
3 6
C
2
11
B
4 1
5
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Drive System
1:8
2
CAD FILE:
A
SHEET
1
3
B
OF
14
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
1.00 X2 TOP
2.63
ISO
C
C
6.00
.75
1.94
2.50 .78 X2
B
7.25 11.75
3.88
.50
.59 X2
3.75
10.00 11.00 A
5.82
FRONT
8
7
6
A
RIGHT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
B
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:8
2
REV.
DRIVE BASE
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
4
B
OF
14
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
CHAMFER .06 @ 45
ISO
C
C
4.34
A
2.38
R .10 TYP
.10 .09
3.96
B
B
.59 X5
1.18
A FRONT
SECTION A-A RIGHT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
FLANGED DRIVE WHEEL B 1:2
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
5
OF
14
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
.22
X4
1.75
.53
ISO 2.88
C
C
.19 TOP CHAMFER .05 @45 TYP 3.25
.04 B
B
2.19 1.94
2.19
.44 1.150
.90
1.556 .48 2.81
FRONT
A
A
RIGHT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
LINEAR GUIDE BEARING B
1:2
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
6
OF
14
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP 12.00 ISO .50 .75
3.90 C
C
10.00
B
B
X2
.78
.59
X2
3.90
R1.30
RIGHT 2.16 A
A
FRONT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
UPPER TRACK
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
7
B
OF
14
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
TOP
D
ISO C
C
1.67
B
3.86
X4 R 1.07
B
.20
.36
1.95 X4
1.06 1.32 A
.12
.17 FRONT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
A
RIGHT
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:2
2
DRIVE STEPPER CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
8
B
OF
14
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP
ISO
C
C
12.05
7.68
2.10
X2 R2.13
B
B
.05
FRONT
A
RIGHT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
A
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
DRIVE BELT
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
9
B
OF
14
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
TOP
D
D
.87 1.22
X4
.22
X .16 X 45.00° X4
.15
ISO
C
C
.31
B
B
7.92 9.42
FRONT
A
A
1.67 SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
STEPPER & 280MM LEAD SCREW
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
B
10 OF 14
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP
.95 .32
C
C
ISO
.38
R.38
B
B
1.33
R.10 TYP
.50
A
A
RIGHT
FRONT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
DWG. NO.
A LEAD SCREW BRACKET
5
4
3
SCALE
2:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
B
11 OF 14
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
TOP
D
.30
R.68
1.90
ISO
.69
C
C
B
B
94.00°
.14
.13
B B
.07 SECTION B-B
.06
A
A
FRONT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
LEAD SCREW END PLATE 1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
B
12 OF 14
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP
ISO
.25
C
.50
1.80 C
8.40
1.00
B
.50
B
.85
2.00
1.50 12.00
A
A
RIGHT FRONT SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
REV.
REAR GUARD
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
B
13 OF 14
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
TOP .85
1.10
ISO C
C
6.75 1.00
B
B
.25
2.63
3.40
2.90
12.00
A
A
FRONT
RIGHT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
REV.
FRONT GUARD
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
B
14 OF 14
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
Encoder Assembly
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:4
SCALE
2
REV.
Encoder Assembly
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
9
8
7
6
4
5
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
3
2
1
TOP 3.00
D
D
4.60
4.60
3.00
2.00 C
C
9.34
B
B
LEFT
FRONT
RIGHT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
BOTTOM 5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
Encoder Assy
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
2
B
OF
9
8
7
6
5
4
ITEM NO.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
3
6
2
1
QTY.
1
PART NUMBER Stationary wheel bracket
2
Measurment wheel
2
3
Pin
2
4
String Potentiometer
1
5
Encoder
1
6
Guide Washer
2
1 D
3 C
2
C
5 B
4
B
ISO SCALE 1:8
1 A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
Encoder Assembly B
1:4
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
3
OF
9
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
TOP 2.00
D
D
1.00 .50
.25
X4
.50
ISO C
C
2.00
.70
R.90
.10
1.00 B
B
R.50 .50 FRONT
8.75 5.25
3.75
A
RIGHT
1.80
1.50 SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
A
2.00 SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:4
2
REV.
Base
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
4
B
OF
9
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
FRONT
ISO SCALE 1:2
RIGHT
3.00
C
C
.50
1.50 1.25
B
B
2.40
120.74°
A
A
R.05 TYP SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
WHEEL
1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
5
B
OF
9
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
ISO
1.75 .50
C
.60 .10
C
.15
B
B
1.200
.15
FRONT
A
RIGHT
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
A
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
GUIDE WASHER
1:1
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
6
B
OF
9
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
ISO
C
C
.50
2.30 B
B
FRONT
RIGHT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:1
2
PIN CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
7
B
OF
9
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
R1.25
R.21
C
ISO SCALE 1:2
1.60 1.50
C
.20
2.50
2.08
B
B
R.05 TYP R.29
RIGHT
FRONT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:1
2
ENCODER
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
8
B
OF
9
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
2.500 .500
1.000
ISO TOP C
C
.35
1.00
.15 .13 B
.90
R.10 .16
.70 .46
R.05 B
B
.29
DETAIL B SCALE 1 : 1
1.70 2.08
FRONT
X4
A
2.50
RIGHT
.20
A
R1.25 SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
REV.
DWG. NO.
SCALE
STRING POTENTIOMETER B 1:2
2
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
9
OF
9
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
5.50
D
ISO SCALE 1:4 3.80
4.57
C
C
B
B
1.62 3.00° PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
HMI
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:2
SCALE
2
CAD FILE:
REV.
HMI SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
TOP VIEW
D
D
ISO VIEW RIGHT VIEW 24.00
C
C
10.10
16.85
6.25
FRONT VIEW
6.50 B
B
13.39
BOTTOM VIEW 17.00 PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
HOSE REEL
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:16 CAD
SCALE
2
REV.
Hose Reel FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
2.36 D
D
C
C
.13 X 45.00° 1.62 1.62
9.15
1.62
B
B
.50
PARTS LIST
M4x0.7 THREAD
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
Light Bar
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:4
SCALE
2
CAD FILE:
REV.
Light Bar SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
C
C
B
B
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
Machine Frame
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:12 CAD
SCALE
2
REV.
Machine Frame FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
3
8
6
7
4
5
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
3
2
1
TOP 8.90
D
25.00
16.00
C
D
C
15.37
17.50 5.50
7.40
44.25
17.50
51.00
.32
27.92
B
B
5.50 LEFT
FRONT
RIGHT
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:24 CAD
2
REV.
Machine Frame B FILE:
SHEET
1
2
OF
3
8
6
7
5
4
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
ISO SCALE 1:2 C
C
1.00
DIM VARIES
B
B
1.00
.21
1.00
.25
.37
A
A
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
SIZE
A
5
4
3
DWG. NO.
SCALE
1:1
2
1010 TYP Profile
CAD FILE:
SHEET
1
REV.
3
B
OF
3
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
FRONT
ISO SCALE 1:32
73.00
19.24
1.36
6.00
C
C
35.88 29.50 11.50 B
B
RIGHT PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
OUTFEED TABLE
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:16 CAD
SCALE
2
REV.
Outfeed Table FILE:
SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
8
7
6
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
ISO SCALE 1:4 4.53 C
C
4.23 4.65 B
B
1.40
PARTS LIST
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
A
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
PAC
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:2
SCALE
2
CAD FILE:
REV.
PAC SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
8
6
7
4
5
3
2
1
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF POLY INDUSTRIAL. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF POLY INDUSTRIAL IS PROHIBITED.
D
D
3.50 ISO SCALE 1:4 C
C
4.88
B
B
4.69
PARTS LIST
1.43 5.16
A
POLY INDUSTRIAL
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES ARE: FRACTIONS
1/16
DECIMALS
.XX .XXX
.01 .005
Manufacturing Sketch
ANGLES
A
.5
PAC-PSU
MATERIAL
SOLIDWORKS Educational Product. For Instructional Use Only
NOTE: ALL UNITS IN INCHES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8
7
6
DRAWN
DATE
J SCHNEPF 12-01-16
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
5
4
CAD GENERATED DRAWING, DO NOT MANUALLY UPDATE
3
SIZE
A
DWG. NO.
1:2
SCALE
2
CAD FILE:
REV.
PAC-PSU SHEET
1
1
B
OF
1
