The cohort shows the number of pupils for whom Progress 8 (P8) was calculated, because they had prior attainment at Key Stage 2. It may be lower than the cohort for. Attainment 8. Charts use four different scales based on the widest confidence interval in each type of grouping (all, SEN, disadvantaged/other, gender).

Progress 8

English

Mathematics

EBacc

LAESTAB: #REF!

No SEN

SEN no EHC/statement

SEN EHC/statement

All

URN: #REF!

Open

2.6

0.7

2.6

2.6

0

0

0

0

-0.7

-2.6

-2.6

-2.6

P8

0.27

-0.02

0.34

0.41

0.5

P8

-0.25

0.01

-1.35

0.07

0

P8

0.68

0.44

1.26

0.47

0.68

P8

0.24

-0.08

0.27

0.41

0.25

Cohort

186

186

186

186

186

Cohort

4

4

4

4

4

Cohort

20

20

20

20

20

Cohort

162

162

162

162

162

Boys

Girls

Other

Disadvantaged 0.7

0.7

1

1

0

0

0

0

-0.7

-0.7

-1

-1

P8

0.01

-0.01

-0.03

0.05

0.03

P8

0.33

-0.02

0.43

0.49

0.35

P8

0.48

0.24

0.46

0.64

0.5

P8

0.11

-0.22

0.25

0.22

0.12

Cohort

36

36

36

36

36

Cohort

150

150

150

150

150

Cohort

81

81

81

81

81

Cohort

105

105

105

105

105

Attainment 8

All pupils Nat

English

Mathematics

EBacc

SEN EHC/statement 48.06

10.36

9.67

12.55

15.49

Nat

60

-

-

Open GCSE

Open non-GCSE

National

SEN no EHC/statement -

-

-

Nat

-

-

No SEN -

-

-

50 20

51.56

10.98

10.37

13.78

16.42

16.94 / -

50

40

40

Nat

60

50

30

40

30

30

30 20 20

20

10

10 0

10

10

0

0

0

A8

51.51

10.39

10.18

14.47

16.47 / -

A8

26.75

7

2

7

10.75 / -

A8

39.6

8.6

8.2

9.05

13.75 / -

A8

53.59

10.69

10.63

15.33

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Cohort

186

186

186

186

186

Cohort

4

4

4

4

4

Cohort

20

20

20

20

20

Cohort

162

162

162

162

162

10.91

10.34

13.86

16.35

51.46

10.91

10.34

13.86

16.35

50.3

10.99

9.72

13.12

16.46

45.92

9.75

9.61

11.99

14.57

0.17 / -

Other

Disadvantaged Nat

51.46

Nat

Girls

Boys

Nat

Nat

60

60

60

60

50

50

50

50

40

40

40

40

30

30

30

30

20

20

20

20

10

10

10

10

0

0

0

0

A8

42.68

9.39

7.89

11.17

14.24 / -

A8

53.63

10.63

10.73

15.27

17 / -

A8

53.68

10.91

10.44

15.2

0.55 / -

A8

49.83

9.98

9.98

13.91

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Entries

NA

-

-

-

-

Cohort

36

36

36

36

36

Cohort

150

150

150

150

150

Cohort

81

81

81

81

81

Cohort

105

105

105

105

105

URN: #REF!

Charts show whether school proportions are close to national (within one pupil from it) by giving the number of pupils repres ented by the gap. % cohort displayed

All pupils English expected progress 100%

0

% cohort displayed

All pupils

Prior attainment:

Mathematics expected progress

95% 86%

94% 81%

Prior attainment: 92%

88% 82%

81%

75%

0

100%

87%

80%

LAESTAB: #REF!

76%

80%

75%

76% 64%

60%

60%

49% 40%

40%

40%

20%

20%

0%

0%

40%

36%

In gap

6

16

8

-3

2

1

6

4

8

In gap

-1

-28

0

0

6

6

7

7

6

Cohort

22

102 #REF!

57

15

92 #REF!

68

36

98 #REF!

50

Cohort

22

102 #REF!

57

15

92 #REF!

68

36

98 #REF!

50

English more than expected progress

Mathematics more than expected progress

100%

100%

80%

80%

86%

62% 60%

56%

60%

49% 40%

40%

36% 27%

27% 20%

38%

47%

40%

31%

35%

20%

13%

9%

0%

33% 16%

13% 8%

0%

In gap

1

13

7

-1

-2

-7

4

9

12

In gap

-3

-18

0

-1

12

0

-1

9

19

Cohort

22

102 #REF!

57

15

92 #REF!

68

36

98 #REF!

50

Cohort

22

102 #REF!

57

15

92 #REF!

68

36

98 #REF!

50

Click to re-scale The confidence interval is shown by the bar that stretches above and below the plotted VA score. Where the whole of the confidence interval is above the 1000 line, the VA is significantly above average (sig+). If it is wholly below the 1000 line, the VA is significantly below average (sig-). Otherwise, the VA is not significantly different from 1000, which can be described as broadly average. Each chart uses a different scale based on the widest confidence interval to be shown.

Best 8

Disadvantaged

All pupils

Other

URN:

Girls

Boys

1044.2

1057.9

1135.9

1000

1000

1000

1000

955.8

#REF!

#REF!

VA

1007.115

1009.844

1028.56

VA

984.3

Cohort

181

176

184

Cohort

36

Subject

English

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

1012.8 991.2 1015.1 1012.8 1032.3 145

39

137

36

150

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

1021

994.6

1025

998.6

1042

1018

VA

1053.1

1000

Cohort

86

95

76

100

81

103

Cohort

3

1

Languages

1001.7

1009.2

1006.9

1000

1000

1000

1000

VA

1002.0

998.0

Cohort

181

181

#REF!

#REF!

1000.2 1001.1 1002.0 1002.2 176

176

184

184

VA

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

999.624

999.565

1000.788

VA

#REF!

#REF!

150

2

13

161

993.1

990.8

998.3

#REF!

No SEN

1007.1 1019.3 1015.4 1009.3 997.34 1071.9 1023.9

Humanities

1003.4

996.6

SEN no EHC/statement

#REF!

VA

Science

Mathematics

#REF!

864.1

942.1

#REF!

LAESTAB:

SEN EHC/statement

1039.3

960.7

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

992.393

994.412

999.499

VA

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

1001.806

1004.364

1005.33

Cohort

130

163

184

Cohort

106

115

67

Cohort

141

138

132

Coverage

72%

91%

99%

Coverage

59%

64%

36%

Coverage

78%

77%

71%

4

20

160

URN: #REF!

Statistically significant results are highlighted for all pupils, boys and girls. They are denoted by a green (sig+) or red (sig-) symbol.

Best 8

Disadvantaged

All pupils Nat

338.3

306.9

308.6

Nat

350.9 350.9

Girls

Other 324.8 324.8

326.6 326.6

Nat

400

400

Boys 350.6 326.5

321.2 293.2

SEN EHC/statement

322.2 295.5

Nat

APS Cohort

Subject

0

326.03 181

329.8 176

333.2 186

0

0

0

English - All pupils Nat

38.8

38.7

38.7

0

296.8 333.3 36 145 0

English

0

0

291.5 339.8 39 140 0

0

Disadvantaged

Nat

0

200 0

APS Cohort

40.5

40.5

289.3 343.7 36 150 0

40.4

#REF!

#REF!

334.1 318.7 86 95

336.4 324.9 77 102

344.3 324.6 81 105

0

0

0

0

0

0

40.5

40.5

Nat

########

#REF!

APS Cohort

38

38.3

Nat 60

50

50

50

50

40

40

40

40

30

30

30

30

20

20

20

20

10

10

10

10

0

0

0

APS Cohort

0

0

42.31 181

40.6 179

41.2 186

0

0

0

0 APS Cohort

0

39.56 42.99 36 145 0

0

0

37.6 39

41.4 140

38.2 36

41.9 150

0

0

0

0

APS Cohort

334 150

210 2

263 13

337 164

207 4

280 20

343 162

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Disadvantaged

40.9 40.9

60

#REF!

0 28

Mathematicss

60

#REF!

216 3

0

Mathematics - All pupils

Other

40.4

APS Cohort

#REF!

60

0

`

328

100

0

0

329.8

200

300

100

0

355.8

No SEN

300

200

200

SEN no EHC/statement

400

400

300

300

LAESTAB: #REF!

Other

40.1 40.1

40.6 40.6

0 0

0

0

37.39 181

40.83 179

40.8 186

0

0

0

0 APS Cohort

0

33.1 38.5 36 145 0

0

0

35.5 42.2 39 140 0

0

32 36

41.9 150

0

0

Statistically significant results are highlighted for all pupils, boys and girls. They are denoted by a green (sig+) or red ( sig-) symbol.

Percentage attaining 5 A* to C including English and Mathematics Nat

URN: #REF!

Disadvantaged

All pupils 60

55

56

Nat

67

67

Other 62

62

Girls

63

63

Nat

Boys 65

55

61

50

60

51

Nat

100

100

100

80

80

80

80

60

60

60

60

40

40

40

40

20

20

20

20

% Cohort

0

0 0

0

0

0

58 181 0

63.7 179 0

60.8 186 0

% Cohort

24

24

Nat

39 36 0

0

61 145 0

0

49 39 0

68 140 0

28

28

42 36 0

78 150 0

% Cohort

28

Nat

#REF!

SEN no EHC/statement

No SEN

64

63

69

100

0

LAESTAB:

SEN EHC/statement

0

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

57 86 0

59 95 0

66 77 0

62 102 0

74 81 0

27

18

28

19

51 105 0

2013 % Cohort

0 3 0

0 28 0

2014 63.3 150 0

0 2 0

8 68.9 13 164 0 0

2015 4 0

0 20 0

0 162 0

Percentage attaining EBacc Disadvantaged

All pupils Nat

22

27

27

Other

Girls

28

Boys 29

SEN EHC/statement 19

Nat

100

100

100

100

80

80

80

80

60

60

60

60

40

40

40

40

20

20

20

20

% Cohort % entered

0

0

0

17.7 181 50.8 0

29.1 179 60.3 0

22.6 63 33.9 0

0

% Cohort % entered

5.6 36 36 0

0

21 0 55 0

13 39 36 0

0

34 0 67 0

14 36 33 0

25 0 34 0

% Cohort % entered

No SEN

28

27

0

0

0

0

SEN no EHC/statement

27

#REF!

#REF!

#REF!

23 86 49 0

40 77 66 0

30 81 43 0

13 95 53 0

21 102 56 0

17 105 27 0

2013 % Cohort % entered

0 3 0 0

0 28 0

2014 21.3 150 57.3 0

0 2 0 0

8 31.1 13 164 15 64.6 0 0

2015 0 4 0 0

5 20 5 0

25.3 162 38.3 0

`

Key Stage 4 schools own inspection dashboard 2016 outcomes ...

Key Stage 4 schools own inspection dashboard 2016 outcomes October 2016.pdf. Key Stage 4 schools own inspection dashboard 2016 outcomes October ...

456KB Sizes 0 Downloads 164 Views

Recommend Documents

DPD Area/Stage Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 ICT Proficiency ...
skills by using different digital tools or services fluently ... you have used Moodle tools productively and ... participation information and big data to help evaluate ...

DPD Area/Stage Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 ICT Proficiency ...
current technological knowledge. Compare the benefits/ ... design and review, and responsive teaching for ... interacted with online educational or professional ...

Key stage 1 Autumn1.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Key stage 1 ...

Key Stage 1 Results.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Key Stage 1 ...

key stage 3 grades 6-8 - Mathigon
Either use the prepared clues (pages 9–10) or come up with your own clues (pages ... Item 2: Spiral Bound Notebook 1, piece of cardbord. Catalogue Nr. 0556.

Chapter 4 Notepacket Key
s XTA-ex -\ ic O. Writing Equations from Roots: esser 2. C-X A- \\ (K A- \\ - O. A root of an equation is a value that makes the equation true. 0. 7 O X A-\ s O X A \ rt O. Use the Zero Product Property to write a quadratic equation with each pair of

Chapter 4 Notepacket Key
sa. Does the parabola open up or down? Graph the quadratic functions. Is the y-coord. of the vertex a max or min? Find the vertex and AOS if possible ... sés. CN. Date Notes 4.2: Dvocacy d. Ysales. A >do & soul Yurc-v- s-. Standard Form of a Quadrat

Aptitude Answer Key 2016 Dec 4.pdf
{]XoI§fpapv. ASbmf§fpw {]XoI§fpw X1⁄2n AÀ° ̄nsâbpw {]m[m\y ̄nsâbpw. ASnØm\ ̄n KWyamb hyXymkapv. ASbmf§Ä AZriybmYmÀ°ys ̄ kqNn ̧n¡p¶p,.

UPSEE 2016 Key Paper 4 - SET DA.pdf
95. B. 96. C. 97. D. 98. D. 99. D. 100.A. www.myengg.com UPSEE 2016 Answer Key - Paper 4 - SET DA http://www.myengg.com/engg/info/category/uptu/.

Student Outcomes - Five Key Steps Toward Improvement.pdf ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Student ...

National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican Schools Report ...
Jun 1, 2012 - school's brochure and on the school website. Parents ... learning and how they can make a difference to the world in which they all live. Children feel ... They enjoy sharing their own prayers during worship, as well as reciting ...

National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican Schools Report ...
Jun 1, 2012 - Explore opportunities for strengthening the links with the parish church of St Barnabas. The school, through its distinctive Christian character, ...

Inspection report February 2016.pdf
Page 1 of 5. The Good Shepherd Trust. Academies in partnership with Guildford Diocese Educational Trust. The Education Centre, The Cathedral, Guildford, ...

National Society Statutory Inspection of Anglican Schools Report ...
Jun 1, 2012 - school's brochure and on the school website. Parents ... learning and how they can make a difference to the world in which they all live. Children feel ... They enjoy sharing their own prayers during worship, as well as reciting ...

Inspection Report March 2016.pdf
Page 1 of 20. A report on. Ysgol Maesglas Greenfield. Greenfield. Holywell. Clwyd. Flintshire. CH8 7JW. Date of inspection: March 2016. by. Estyn, Her Majesty's Inspectorate for Education. and Training in Wales. Page 1 of 20 ...

Lula stage dimensions 2016.pdf
r. s. : p. e. r. f. : c. o. n. t. a. c. t. : H. o. w. a. r. d. L. a. u. r. i. e. 4. 1. 6. 2. 0. 0. 8. 8. 4. 0. h. a. l. a. u. d. i. o. @. r. o. g. e. r. s . c. o. m. 2. 2. ' 8. ' 1. 0. ' 1. 0. ' Page 1 of 1.

maas conference 2016 - Norfolk Schools
make informed decisions on how best to establish a pedagogically sound ... for Years 3-4 and Years 5-6, as well as English tips for Collins Big Cat online ...

June 2016 FSWG Dashboard 20160609 - Stories from Syrian Refugees
current program areas within Sanliurfa province. Another partner is also waiting for confirmation of funding from ECHO to start an e-voucher program in Kirikhan, ...

TNPSC Group 4 Answer Key 2018_English_Language.pdf ...
Adanya jaminan Undang-Un- dang terkait besaran dana pen- didikan membuat pembayaran .... TNPSC Group 4 Answer Key 2018_English_Language.pdf.

Key Communique - April 4.pdf
... Board of Education, 515 Macleod Trail SE, Calgary, Alberta T2G 2L9, Canada. This email is driven by DriveItTM. Page 1 of 1. Key Communique - April 4.pdf.