Madras Agric. J., 93 (1-6) : 79-85 January-June 2006

Studies on the shelf life of fully ripe guava fruits using wax emulsion P.RAJKUMAR, R.KAILAPPAN AND V.THIRUPATHI Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore

Abstract: Shelf life of guava fruits was assessed by coating with wax emulsions. Four levels of wax emulsions viz. 3, 4, 5 and 6% were prepared by adding oleic acid, triethanolamine and hot water. A hand operated wax-coating machine was developed to coat wax on guava fruits. Physiological loss in weight of wax-coated fruits was assessed during the storage period. Organoleptic evaluation was also performed on the wax-coated fruits to assess the shelf life. From the results, it was found that the shelf life of 6% wax emulsion coated guava fruits could be extended up to 7 days and for the control it was only 4 days. Key words: Paraffin wax, Wax emulsion, Guava fruits, Shelf life, Organoleptic evaluation, Physiological loss in weight.

Introduction Guava is one of the most common sub tropical fruits grown in India and occupies fourth in area and production. The fruit is highly perishable and utmost care should be taken in the post harvest handling and processing to reduce the post harvest losses. Incompetent handling of fruits results in injury to the surface layer making them more susceptible to attack by spoilage organisms with consequent reduction in consumer appeal in the market. The fruit is being a seasonal commodity as they create glut during the season and become scarce during the off- season usage. It has been estimated that inadequate storage and handling facilities result in losses in the order of 35 to 40% of the total production of fruits. By considering the nutritive value it is necessary to deploy modern methods to extend the shelf life for better distribution and also processing techniques to preserve them for using in the offseason.

There are different methods of extending shelf life of fruits viz., pre-cooling, cold storage, controlled atmosphere storage and wax coating. In all these methods, the shelf life is extended by reducing the respiration rate and moisture loss from the fruits. Except wax coating method, all the methods are sophisticated and costly. Also in India, cold storage facilities are not within the easyreach of farmers / fruit growers. Thomas et al. (1971) reported that wax coating (6%) in banana cv. Dwarf Cavendish found to increase the storage life by 6 days in ambient temperature and 7 days in cold storage (1218°C) than control. He also observed that waxing in poovan increased the shelf life by 8 days than untreated in ambient storage. Kahlon and Bajwa (1991) reported that the storage life was extended up to 20 days in litchi cv. Calcuttia using wax emulsion (6%) and packed in perforated polyethylene bags with paper cuttings and kept in cold storage. Sarkar et al. (1995) concluded that banana cv. Giant Governor could be kept for 14 days after

80

P. Rajkumar, R.Kailappan and V.Thirupathi

Table 1. Wax emulsion treatments. Treatments

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 Control

Wax (g)

Oleic acid (ml)

Triethonolamine (ml)

Hot water (ml)

Average wax emulsion %

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

120 160 200 120 160 200 120 160 200 120 160 200

1400

6

1800

5

2200

4

2600

3

0

Table 2. Physiological loss in weight (percent) for guava fruits. Treatments

Initial weight (g)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 Control Treatments Wax emulsion Storage Wax x Storage

65.16 63.17 64.12 65.67 64.76 66.12 64.38 65.71 64.89 65.12 66.23 65.41 64.15

Storage days 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1.86 1.74 1.55 2.21 2.06 1.88 2.47 2.19 2.00 2.78 2.57 2.36 4.62

3.56 3.23 2.86 4.08 3.66 3.40 4.48 4.14 3.75 5.29 4.81 4.49 8.26

5.11 4.55 4.01 5.80 5.16 4.79 6.41 5.93 5.38 7.51 6.88 6.37 11.35

6.61 5.75 5.07 7.33 6.52 6.04 8.12 7.64 6.89 9.53 8.79 8.33 14.23

8.00 6.81 5.99 8.84 7.75 7.20 9.79 9.17 8.25 11.45 10.54 9.87 17.21

9.33 7.87 6.85 10.24 8.82 8.16 11.30 10.55 9.43 13.56 12.70 11.26 20.48

10.49 8.78 7.55 11.49 9.88 9.02 13.17 11.80 15.12 15.23 14.10 13.82 22.29

SEd

CD (5%)

CD (1%)

0.034 0.025 0.09

0.067 0.049 0.17

0.08 0.06 0.23

81

weight loss (%)

weight loss (%)

Studies on the shelf life of fully ripe guava fruits using wax emulsion

Storage period

weight loss (%)

weight loss (%)

Storage period

Storage period

Storage period

82

P. Rajkumar, R.Kailappan and V.Thirupathi

harvest without significant effects on their total and reducing sugars, acidity and ascorbic acid content if they were treated with bavistin or dithane M-45 or 6 per cent waxol. Alache and Munoz (1998) stated that mango fruits treated with prima fresh 50-E wax extended the shelf life of fruits up to 21 days at low temperature and also maintains its quality and acceptability. Sapota treated with nature seal or candle wax and then with CIPA (Ethepon - 2000 mg/L), stored at 20° C up to 8 days showed no increase in shelf life with wax coating, but enhanced the appearance and significantly reduces the weight loss. Ozdemir and Dunder (2001) showed that weight loss of orange cv. Valencia fruits treated with hot water for 3 minutes at 53°C followed by wax coating was lesser than that of control. Wax treated fruits accumulated more ethanol during storage. Therefore, the wax coating method seems to be the cheapest and easy to practice for prolonging the shelf life of fruits by considering advantages viz. controlling moisture loss and respiration rate, enhancing appearance by the glossiness of the wax. Further, the wax-coated fruits can be easily accepted by the consumer and can also be exported to fetch more values under this liberalized economic policy. Materials and Methods A hand operated wax applicator has been fabricated and the schematic diagram is shown in fig 1. It consists of a feed hopper, cylindrical drum known as wax vat, impeller fitted with four paddles mounted on a shaft and outlet chute. A handle is provided at one end of the shaft to rotate the impeller at 10 rpm. The vanes are made up of perforated sheets with oblong perforations. The vanes are positioned at an angle of 45° to the tangent. This angle is greater than the angle of repose of guava fruits used for the experiment. The

impeller is housed inside a casing which is split into two halves. The bottom half of the casing is used to hold the wax, also known as wax vat. The successive vanes of the impeller along with the casing form four pockets. These pockets receive the fruits from the feed hopper, conveying them through the wax emulsion contained in the wax vat and also deliver the fruits due to gravity through the outlet chute. The entire unit is supported on an L angle frame of convenient height. Among the waxes, paraffin wax is cheaper than carnauba and bee wax. Therefore paraffin wax was used for the experimental study. Different paraffin wax emulsions were prepared by taking 100 g waxes with oleic acid (75100 ml) as solving agent, triethonolamine (120200ml) as emulsifying agent and hot water (1400 - 2600 ml) as diluting agent for each trial (Nithya Devi, 2003). Wax emulsion is filled in the wax vat to the level of 1 inch above the bottom of the impeller. The impeller is given a constant rotation of about 10 rpm through the handle manually for 2 minutes. Uniform size and weight of guava (60 - 70g) fruits were selected for wax coating. The fruits are fed through the feed hopper. These fruits are received by the impeller blades, taken through the wax column; the wax coated fruits are passed on to the outlet chute. Then these fruits are collected on perforated trays and finally dried under sunshine for 2 hours to remove the excess moisture in the wax emulsion. Physical characteristics viz., texture, flavour, taste and overall acceptance were judged organoleptically by a panel of 7 judges based on the hedonic scale ranging from 1- dislike extremely to 9-like extremely. The physiological loss in weight (PLW) was assessed by weighing the fruits during the storage period. The storage

8.12 8.26 8.35 8.03 8.10 8.15 8.01 8.07 8.05 7.98 7.95 7.92 6.97

8.13 8.17 8.15 8.16 8.05 8.31 8.35 8.21 8.23 7.85 7.61 7.35 6.85

8.09 8.17 8.15 8.03 8.07 8.15 8.03 8.02 8.15 7.95 7.80 8.01 7.21

8.17 8.31 8.41 8.38 8.12 8.34 8.21 8.26 8.25 7.85 7.81 7.92 7.15

SEd

0.082 0.045 0.165

Treatments

Wax emulsion Storage days Wax x storage

Mean values of three replications.

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 Control

4th day of storage 8.31 8.25 8.31 8.12 8.15 8.13 7.98 7.95 8.01 7.12 7.24 7.23 6.01

0.163 0.090 0.327

CD (5%)

8.12 8.15 8.18 8.11 8.05 8.11 8.08 8.12 8.13 7.45 7.39 7.48 5.49

8.15 8.16 8.19 8.02 8.12 8.09 7.81 7.35 7.48 7.15 7.11 7.15 5.09

8.02 8.25 8.36 8.05 8.01 8.09 7.81 7.85 7.83 7.03 7.05 7.02 5.12

0.216 0.120 0.433

CD (1%)

8.01 8.05 8.07 8.01 8.09 8.04 7.68 7.68 7.64 6.15 6.01 6.08 3.51

Texture Taste

7.85 8.01 8.01 7.92 7.95 7.96 7.12 7.05 7.13 6.05 6.13 6.09 3.34

7.87 7.85 7.86 7.96 7.87 7.90 7.15 7.17 7.16 6.08 6.04 6.12 3.12

6th day of storage

Taste Overall Flavour acceptability

5th day of storage

Treat- Flavour Texture Taste Overall Flavour Texture ments acceptability

8.01 8.05 8.06 7.89 7.76 7.82 7.09 7.08 7.12 6.01 6.12 6.08 3.04

7.42 7.51 7.54 7.01 7.31 7.25 5.12 5.05 4.98 3.98 2.46 2.23 1.97

7.05 7.23 7.23 7.05 7.24 7.36 4.87 5.12 5.15 4.12 2.67 2.34 2.05

7.15 7.31 7.36 7.09 7.15 7.24 4.83 5.23 4.05 2.67 2.32 2.67 1.95

7th day of storage 7.15 7.21 7.25 7.04 7.02 7.21 4.96 4.81 4.01 2.45 2.12 2.13 1.55

Overall Flavour Texture Taste Overall acceptability acceptability

Table 3. Effect of wax emulsion on Flavour, Texture, Taste and Overall acceptability based on organoleptic evaluation.

Studies on the shelf life of fully ripe guava fruits using wax emulsion 83

84

P. Rajkumar, R.Kailappan and V.Thirupathi

life was assessed based on the organoleptic evaluation. The results are given in Table 2. Results and Discussion From the study it was found that the solvents could be used to dilute the wax emulsion and the wax could be stabilized as liquid under atmospheric temperature. To prepare low viscous uniform wax emulsion, 10 minutes stirring at 1000 rpm was required. The wax emulsion requirement to coat 100 kg of guava fruits was found to be 275 ml. The physiological loss in weight (PLW) gradually increased when the storage period extended. From the figure 2 it is observed that the PLW varied between 15.23 and 22.29% for the guava fruits coated with 3% wax emulsion after 7 days of storage period. The PLW was significantly lesser in T12 and higher in T10. In the same period, the unwaxed guava fruits recorded the highest PLW of 22.29% after 7 days of storage. From the figure 3 it is found that the PLW was higher (13.17%) in T7 and lower (15.12%) in T9 after 7 days of storage. From the figure 4 and 5 it is observed that the shelf life of wax coated guava fruits could be increased to 7 days. Among the wax emulsion treatments, the PLW recorded the lowest (7.55%) in T3. Generally after the above said storage peirods, the guava fruits devoid of wax showed decay symptoms rendering it unfit for further evaluation. The wax emulsion treatments significantly reduced the physiological losses in weight of fruits. It is also found that the triethanolamine used as emulsifying agent influenced the variation in PLW during storage.

The capacity of the wax coating machine was found to 300 kg per hour. The cost of operation is Rs. 20/- per hour. Flavour Data presented in Table 3 indicate that there is significant loss of flavour during the storage period. The loss was highest in control (1.97) than with wax emulsion treated fruits. Among the wax emulsion treated guava fruits, the flavour retention was highest (7.54) in T3 after 7 days of storage. Jawanda et al. (1978) stated that kinnow mandarin treated with 6 % wax emulsion retained the usual flavour during the storage period. Texture The highest texture value was with 6 % wax emulsion treated fruits after 7 days of storage. However there was no significant difference in texture value for the fruits coated with 5 and 6 % wax emulsion. But in the case of guava fruits coated with 4%,3 % and control recorded the lowest texture values. It may be possible that the higher concentration of wax emulsion reduce microbial activity and respiration rate of cells there by helping in retaining good texture. Taste Wax emulsion treatments significantly helped in retaining the taste of fruits after 7 days of storage. The highest taste value of 7.36 was recorded in T3 followed by T2 and T6. The control lost all its taste after 7 days of storage. Banana treated with wax and rice starch possessed better taste than control during the 15 days storage period (Sarkar et al., 1995). Overall acceptability Based on the organoleptic evaluation performed on the guava fruits, it was found

Studies on the shelf life of fully ripe guava fruits using wax emulsion

that the shelf life of 6 % wax emulsion treated fruits could stored up to 7 days and unwaxed (control) could be stored only up to 4 days. The other wax emulsion treatments like 3 % and 4% treated fruits could be stored up to 5, and 6 days respectively. It was also found that by increasing the wax concentrations with triethanolamine as emulsifying agent, the shelf life of fruits could be increased. From the study it was found that the wax emulsion could be prepared by using oleic acid as a solvent and triethanolamine as an emulsifying agent with hot water the wax could be stabilized as liquid under atmospheric temperature. The wax applicator can be effectively used for coating fruits for extending the shelf life, it was also found that the wax emulsion coated guava and mango fruits could be extended up to 7 days against 4 days only for the unwaged (control) guava fruits. The authors wish to thank the ICAR PHT Scheme for providing necessary financial assistance for carrying out the research work.

References Alache, G.J and Munoz, A.C. (1998). Use of wax in storage of mangoes cv. Piqueno. IDESIA 15 : 15-19. Jawanda, J.S. and Ragbir Singh,V.K. (1978). Studies on extending post harvest life of kinnow mandarin. Punjab Hort. J. 18 (34) : 15-25. Kahlon, P.S and Bajwa, K.S. (1991). Effect of bavistin wax emulsion and wrappers on the storage life of litchi cv. Calcuttia. Indian Fd. Packer, 45(1): 35-38. Nithya Devi, A. (2003). Enhancing the shelf life of banana (Musa spp) cv. Rasthali using wax, chemical and bio-fungicide. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Fruits, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore Ozdemir, A.E. and Durdar, O. (2001). Effect of different post harvest applications on storage of oranges. Acta Hort. 533 (2): 561-564. Sarkar, H.N., Hasan, M.D.A and Chattopadhyay, P.K. (1995). Studies on shelf life of banana as influenced by chemicals. J of Tropical Agriculture, 33(1): 97-100. Thomas, P., Paul, P., Nagaraja, N. and Dalai, V.B.(1971). Physiological and respiratory changes in dwarf Cavendish variety of bananas during growth and maturation. J.Fd. Sci. Technol 20(2): 51-56.

85

Masu - Jan-June 2006.p65

Physiological loss in weight of wax-coated fruits was assessed during the storage period. Organoleptic evaluation was also performed on the wax-coated fruits.

94KB Sizes 2 Downloads 179 Views

Recommend Documents

Masu - July-December 2006.p65
Monitoring of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide and chlorpyriphos residues ... systems of monitoring, which can measure .... by Pesticides, Ed. C.A, Edwards.

MASU - 2008 JULY (2ND).pmd
Character association and path analysis in sunflower ... importance in recent years due to its economic values ... The data were subjected to analysis of variance.

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
The data gathered were analyzed for understanding the level of ... better proliferation that would have increased the photosynthetic area and enhanced the flow.

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
the mutual relationship between various characters and is used to determine the component character on which selection can be done for improvement in yield.

Masu - July-December 2006.p65
45x 15 cm spacing. All the agronomic practices and plant protection measures were adopted .... of okra shows a declining trend. Hence developing high yielding ...

Masu - July-December 2006.p65
Agricultural University, Coimbatore during. 1999-2002, to study the ... varying degrees of correlation between yield ..... Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 105-128.

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
demand, shorter duration and lesser water requirement, can be accommodated at any stage of the sequence without dislocating other crops. Though it is a drought tolerant, requiring less input and care, irrigation and application of fertilizers etc. ar

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
and direct sowing in dry season), Irrigation (conventional flooded irrigation vs. water saving irrigation), weeding methods (manual vs. mechanical weeding) and nutrient management (recommended amount of fertilizers without vs. with green manure). The

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
Abstract : An Experiment was conduced at Horticultural Research Station, Udhagamandalam to trace the pattern of seed development and maturation as well as improving the germination and seedling growth of gaillardia for profuse and healthy flower prod

MASU - 2008 JULY (2ND).pmd
low dose of fertilizers applied by the farmers. However, presently ... increasing farm income to above a subsistence level. The approach of ... Table 1. Yield attributing characters of tossa jute as influenced by different treatments. Treatment. Plan

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
the maize and sorghum growers were old aged, possessed high educational status, did agriculture as ... extension agency, risk orientation and credit orientation.

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
Now, the area irrigated by tanks had ... channel, catchment area, foreshore area, tank bed etc. DHAN (2002) .... Officer (VAO) to check any encroachment in tank.

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
Jan 8, 1995 - CO(Gb)14 – An extra early duration photo-insensitive high yielding ... culture COLT 22/1 was developed by hybridization and pedigree ...

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
The test rig consists of 0.75 kW electric motor and a variable speed ... attached with fuel consumption meter was ... meter was placed across the basins and the.

MASU - 2008 JULY (2ND).pmd
1000 grain weight and days to 50 per cent flowering exerted maximum direct effect ... and also number of productive tillers and earhead girth exerted direct effect ...

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
(Jayaraman et al., 1976). Therefore surplus eggs have ..... P. and Patia, B.S. (1976) Development of dehydrated ... dehydrated apple powder. Unpublished thesis ...

Masu - July-December 2006.p65
of the cross involving CO 2 x MS 1684. It yields on an average 1567 kg ha-1 of grain and 5783 kg ha-1 of straw under rainfed condition. ... 5487. 5346. Per cent increase. 27.3. 9.0 over CO 3. Per cent increase. 28.0. 11.9 over Paiyur 2. A. Nirmalakum

Masu - Jan-June 2006.p65
block of Dindigul District over a period of. 10 years (1994 -2003) was used in the study. Compound Growth Rate was worked out to analyse the data.

Masu - Jan-June 2007.p65
able 1. Effect of leaf crinkle virus infection on yield and seed quality parameters. Parameters. TPU 4 ... ii. Pods / pl. 66.61. 44.11. 59.11. 47.10. 48.60. 41.55. 58.11. 44.25. 23.85 iii. Seeds / pod. 6.80. 5.69 ... 9th Western Zonal Meeting of I.P.

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
Sl.No. Entries. Rust (grade). LLS (grade). 20. AIS-2006-3. 5.9. 4.8. 21. AIS-2006-4. 5.5. 6.0. 22. AIS-2006-5. 7.5. 7.0. 23. AIS-2006-6. 7.5. 7.0. 24. AIS-2006-7. 7.5.

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
Drying kinetics of arecanut using solar cum biomass drying system .... (i) Solar air heater, (ii) Heat exchanger,(iii) .... with areca water) were dried using the solar.

MASU-Jan-June 2008.p65
Spike. Spike. Spike. 1000 grain yield height. 50% flowering tillers prod.tillers length thickness yield weight. Grain yield. 1.000. 0.49**. -0.22**. -0.08. 0.38**. 0.63**. 0.41**. 0.25**. 0.25**. Plant height. 1.000. -0.01. -0.43**. -0.90**. 0.23**.

MASU - 2008 JULY (2ND).pmd
with three different pot mixtures viz., Soil: FYM: Sand (2:1:1), Soil : Vermicompost: Sand (2:1:1) and Soil: Coirpith compost: Sand. (2:1:1) in three replicates of 50 bags each. .... Crop Sci., 13: 360-363. Gopi, P. (2002). Effect of vermicompost on

Masu - July-December 2007.p65
and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-518. Gupta, R.R. (1972). Interrelationship studies among some yield attributes in Rai [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss]. Madras Agric. J.,