Project 1.1.4 Architectural Features Rubric Elements

Exterior Model Accuracy

Workmanship

Weight

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

All exterior model features/elements are accurately depicted and correctly illustrate the chosen style.

Most exterior model features/elements are accurately depicted and correctly illustrate the chosen style.

Some exterior model features/elements are depicted accurately. It is possible to correctly identify the chosen style.

2 Points

Few exterior model features/elements are depicted accurately. It is difficult to identify the style from the model features/elements. The finished The finished The finished The finished product displays product displays product displays product displays consistently good fair workmanship. poor excellent workmanship, Many workmanship. workmanship, although minor imperfections in Many instances of including attention instances of poor construction exist, poor fit and messy to detail, fit or messy joints including loose joints exist. Pieces components that exist. Minor joints. The model fall off or model fit together neatly, imperfections in is generally falls apart when joints that are construction exist. fragilely moved. neat and free of constructed. excess glue, straight lines, and corners at right angles. The finished product is professionally constructed.

1 – 0 Points

Total

The exterior model features/elements are not depicted accurately and do not correctly illustrate the chosen style. There is little evidence of attention to detail or conscientious effort at good construction.

© 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc. Civil Engineering and Architecture Project 1.1.4 Architectural Features Rubric – Page 1

The information included is accurate and completely addresses each component of the assigned topic or research question.

Narrative Content

Punctuation, grammar, usage, and spelling are effectively used throughout the report.

Minor errors in punctuation, grammar, usage, and spelling are evident, but they do not interfere with the readability of the report. All sources are Sources are reputable, follow listed, mostly APA APA style and in style OR some in text text citations are citations/footnotes missing used Respectful during Respectful during showcase. Asks showcase. #4 appropriate answered questions. #4 answered in detail

Narrative Grammar

Sources and Citations

Conclusion Question #4 and showcase Conclusion questions #1 - 3

The information included adequately addresses each component of the assigned topic or research question.

The information included inadequately addresses the assigned topic or research question. The information included is sometimes inaccurate. Occasional errors in punctuation, grammar, usage, and spelling are evident and interfere with the readability of the report.

The information included does not address the assigned topic or research.

There is no evidence of accurate content information.

Major errors in punctuation, grammar, usage, and/or spelling interfere with the readability of the report.

The report contains significant errors in punctuation, grammar, usage, and spelling.

Sources are listed Sources are listed 0 – no sources – APA style listed lacking for all OR no in text citations

Lack of focus during showcase. #4 answered OR respectful but #4 not answered

NA

0 - #4 not answered and lack of focus during presentation

5 pts HW grade

© 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc. Civil Engineering and Architecture Project 1.1.4 Architectural Features Rubric – Page 2

Project 1.1.4 Architectural Features Rubric

features/elements. The exterior model features/elements are not depicted accurately and do not correctly illustrate the chosen style. Workmanship. The finished product displays consistently excellent workmanship, including attention to detail, components that fit together neatly, joints that are neat and free of excess glue,.

61KB Sizes 2 Downloads 156 Views

Recommend Documents

Rubric:
Instead of using levels, why not assess every assignment and/or project against a consistent rubric. When accompanied by authentic feedback, you will see the ...

Project Grants Program Rubric - Rev. January 2014.pdf
Project Grants Program Rubric - Rev. January 2014.pdf. Project Grants Program Rubric - Rev. January 2014.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.

man-114\principles-processes-tools-and-techniques-of-project ...
man-114\principles-processes-tools-and-techniques-of-project-management.pdf. man-114\principles-processes-tools-and-techniques-of-project-management.

Back of Judges Rubric- ENGINEERING PROJECT 2016[1] copy.pdf ...
Rubric adapted STEAM Science Fair Engineering/Design Projects Rubric. (over). A rating for a specific project component can range from 0 to 5, using whole numbers please for a maximum of 60 points. (February 2016). Science Fair Score Sheet: Chicago Z

CI 201 Digital Photo Storybook Rubric Project Criteria ...
C I 201 Digital Photo Storybook Rubric. Project Criteria. 5 pts. (Outstanding). 4 pts. (Satisfactory). 2-3 pts. (Needs Work). 0-1 pts. (Unacceptable). Writing/Literacy. Content. Correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar and usage. All co

CWRA+ Scoring Rubric
Analysis and Problem Solving. CAE 215 Lexington Avenue, Floor 16, New York, NY 10016 (212) 217-0700 [email protected] cae.org. Making a logical decision ...

Salient Features of the Project Activity-Environmental Parameter ...
Salient Features of the Project Activity-Environmental Parameter Activity note 2.pdf. Salient Features of the Project Activity-Environmental Parameter Activity note ...

Oral Presentation Rubric
You will create and present a 5- to 7-minute oral presentation to the class, using at least one prop. Presentation must ... support theme. □ Uses correct grammar.

114.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. 114.pdf. 114.pdf.

114.pdf
list of obstacles to entrepreneurial development (Driver, Wood, Segal & Herrington, ... understanding of intended behaviour increases. Page 3 of 30. 114.pdf.

COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf
September 29, 2017. Page 1 of 1. COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf. COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.

COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf
September 29, 2017. Page 1 of 1. COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf. COMP 17 - 316 Project Officer (Architectural).pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.

Oral Presentation Grading Rubric
Nonverbal Skills. 4 – Exceptional. 3 – Admirable. 2 – Acceptable. 1 – Poor. Eye Contact. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact ...

Board Builder Rubric
best use of space. Student has made the board visually appealing, and ... a degree of creativity and planning. Student has taken little care to make the.

114.pdf
10 VANDANA M 13955 - MANYA GURU U P S. KARIVELLUR(Kannur) 0 B 3. 11 AKSHARA MOHANAN 13944 - KOROM D S A U P S(Kannur) 0 C 1.

Search features
Search Features: A collection of “shortcuts” that get you to the answer quickly. Page 2. Search Features. [ capital of Mongolia ]. [ weather Knoxville, TN ]. [ weather 90712 ]. [ time in Singapore ]. [ Hawaiian Airlines 24 ]. To get the master li

arcade rubric reflection.pdf
Sign in. Loading… Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying.

BioChemistry (114).pdf
Page 2 of 2. ro -c\I o. ro. L- o6. +i !o. +l. {D .goB. hr. '6l. +). C) .'nl .sO 6). +. lu). ca. c{. co. @. c\l ... BioChemistry (114).pdf. BioChemistry (114).pdf. Open. Extract.

Rubric 3 - Listening.pdf
Attempts to focus attention on the. speaker;. • Attempts to respond appropriately;. • Attempts to incorporate critical. thinking. Page 1 of 1. Rubric 3 - Listening.pdf.

rubric-Plan-View.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item.

Iind Grade Draftsman - Architectural - PWD - Architectural Wing.pdf ...
for rmf t.uss, bean, weathe. sbed elc : ... Thenodulu\.felrd' 'i, (Dlaid hulL moduiui(ll). 20. ... Iind Grade Draftsman - Architectural - PWD - Architectural Wing.pdf.

114 Writers Draft.pdf
(CONTINUED). Page 3 of 48. 114 Writers Draft.pdf. 114 Writers Draft.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying 114 Writers Draft.pdf. Page 1 ...